Free Essay

Group Case -Business Ethics

In: Business and Management

Submitted By SaraPhoenix
Words 2996
Pages 12
Q 1: Discuss and analyze the ethical issues reflected in the case.

The case is about British American Tobacco (BAT), London-based tobacco firm, which is involved in doing unethical activities and hence breaking their marketing code in Africa. BBC had investigated and found BAT is trying to attract more young African buyers of its product by adjusting marketing strategy to meet young people's needs. They are actually promoting and selling cigarettes in form of “single sticks”, which is attractive to young people of poor African countries like Nigeria, Malawi and Mauritius, who cannot afford to buy a whole packet of cigarettes.

Now, there is nothing wrong with marketing one's product to target an audience of possible consumers. However, in this case, BAT allegedly targeted African children as young as 11 by aggressively marketing single sticks' to them. The company also hosted events that targeted young people despite their publicly stated commitments. Now, we know that most ethical issues concerning business consumer relations refer to the ‘marketing mix’, ethical issues in product policy, marketing communications, pricing and marketing strategy.

Ethical Issues in marketing management – Product Policy

At the most basic level, manufacturers should exercise due care in establishing that all reasonable steps are taken to ensure that their products are free from defects and safe to use as well as effective and fit for the purpose. Cigarette may be effective as they claim it to be. It works as stress reliever and give one some attitude, the purpose may be fulfilled, but it is not a safe product in any measure. And though consumers’ right to a safe product is not an unlimited right, but here they targeted children as young as 11 found buying and consuming single cigarettes. They are really vulnerable and unlimited right is not applicable for them.

Ethical issues in marketing management – marketing communications
Here BAT is making both individual and social impact. Because smoking is still a taboo in those countries mentioned and less than 10% of the population smoke. So, BAT is practicing deceptive practices by creating false beliefs about cigarettes in the individual’s consumers’ mind. They put posters of depicting single cigarettes and showing the price. As for social impact, they sponsored a music event where there was no formal age check, they offered lavish prizes in competitions featured by them, and they offered single cigarettes which are particularly attractive to young people, they also painted shops the same color as Matinee, one of their leading brands. By doing these, they are making cigarettes intrusive and unavoidable. African people were good without cigarettes as it was said earlier less than 10% were smokers, but by offering cigarettes in attractive manner, they are creating artificial wants.

Ethical issues in marketing strategy
If company is criticized when there is a perceived violation of the consumers, that is, right to be treated fairly (duty of care). Targeting vulnerable consumers is unethical. Consumers here must be treated as vulnerable as they have lack of sufficient education or information to use products safely and also they are unable to fully understand the consequences of their action, because they are too young to make competent independent decisions. They can be easily manipulated as there are customers as young as 11 years old.

Perceived harmfulness of the product: There is a positive relation between vulnerability and harmfulness. More vulnerable the customer, the product is more harmful. Here customers are really vulnerable, they are illiterate, not able to take proper decision as they do not have sufficient information about what could happen if they start smoking in such an early age.

Q 2. Analyze the activities of BAT using the normative ethical theories and find out whether these activities are right or wrong.

In this case we found that British American Tobacco (BAT) which is a London-based tobacco firm involved in doing unethical activities and also break their marketing code in their African operation. According to the normative ethical theories, we analyze the activities of BAT in Nigeria, Malawi and Mauritius:

According to the Traditional theory


Egoism: According to egoism theory activities done by BAT at Africa is ethical. In Malawi BAT sponsored music events where the company was not arrange any formal age checking on the gate. They also allow selling single cigarettes which goes against their marketing code. In Mauritius BAT has painted shops with the color that represent one of their brand. All these activities done by BAT was for company’s short term benefit. But in the long run, market mechanism will force customers, international bodies to realize it and protest against it. Here we found that outcome of these unethical marketing practices is good so according to this theory situation is ethically right.

Utilitarianism: This theory is also based on outcome not action. Here we do cost benefit analysis taking the two scenarios. One is breaking marketing code and other is maintaining the marketing code.

| |Breaking Marketing code |Maintaining Marketing Code |
|BAT |Profit will be higher |Bad Conscience |Good Conscience |Losing profit |
|Shopkeeper or Seller |Earn money | | |Have to find new |
| | | | |opportunity to make money|
|Celebrities |Attractive image and |Negative impact on | |May have to find other |
| |among young generation |celebrity image | |such opportunities |
| |and earn money | | | |
|Young generation |Feeling of being adult or|Severe bad impact on |Healthy and proper life |May find other way to |
| |have got maturity that |health |as their parent’s want |showing an attractive |
| |may reflect in their | | |growing up personality |
| |personality | | | |
|Family members | |Anxious for their |Get relief from |Children may find |
| | |children |anxiousness for their |vulnerable way |
| | | |children | |

According to Utilitarianism theory, we found that benefit is more than cost in case of breaking BAT’s marketing code. On the other hand cost is higher than benefit in case of maintaining the marketing code. So according to Utilitarianism theory breaking marketing code is ethical because here benefit is more than cost.

Non Consequentialist:

Ethics of Duties: We know that there are three maxims in ethics of duties. So, we can analyze the case according to the three maxims:

Maxim 1(Consistency): Here BAT has broken its own marketing code. BAT has done such unethical issues at their African operation but they did not apply such things at their home country. We can say that it is not a consistent practice. So, it is unethical according to maxim 01.

Maxim 2(Human Dignity): BAT’s unethical promotional campaign like selling single cigarettes, arranging music event, painting the shops encourages or promote young generation to become a smoker violate the basic human right So, it is unethical according to maxim 2.

Maxim 3(Universality): It is not possible for BAT to flash their unethical activities publicly or in front of media that they are breaking their marketing codes and encouraging young people to become a smoker. So, it is unethical according to maxim 3.

So according to Ethics of duties we can say that the practice of breaking marketing code and promoting cigarettes to young people in Africa is an unethical practice.

Ethics of rights and justice:

Rights: Here BAT’s promotional campaign in Africa promote cigarette among young generation. By doing this basic human rights is violated because by this children are developing nicotine habit and it increase the probability of smoking related diseases. So, it is unethical.

Justice: BAT is applying two different promotional programs in home country and Africa and they make profit through young generation. The justice of the BAT was not right. So according to justice it is an unethical practice.

Contemporary Theory:

Virtue Ethics: In the case, we found that BAT is promoting cigarette among young people. By doing this they are violating basic human rights. This is not ethically right. So we can say that this decision involves intellectual virtue but lacking moral virtue

Feminist Ethics: As this theory focuses on relationship, caring, harmony so according to this theory Mr. Proctor should not talk to the media because it will affect their good relationship with the top management.

Discourse Ethics: This theory says that if there is ethical dilemma then all the parties should sit together and should try to find an acceptable solution. According to discourse ethics, to solve the ethical dilemma at Africa all the parties-Mr. Proctor, top management, any international bodies, media should sit together and found a norm for the unethical practices.

Post modern Ethics: According to post modern ethics some of the factors need to be considered:

Holistic Approach: The decision that is promoting cigarette among young generation which is taken by top management of BAT is not applicable or expected in their own life. So this is an unethical decision.

Example rather than principle: BAT should follow the example or practice rather than principal which was applied in home country.

Think local, act local: BAT should consider local culture and context when they break their marketing code. According to the local culture promoting cigarette among young generation is unethical. So BAT should be careful when they break the code.

Preliminary Characteristics: BAT should learn from previous unethical decisions and their outcomes. Company should concern to make decision regarding this sensitive issue.

Q 3: Analyze the influencing factors in the decision making process of Mr. Proctor.

After analyzing the case, we have seen that British American Tobacco (BAT) Company is doing their business unethically in some of the African countries like Nigeria, Malawi and Mauritius. By doing unethical business, BAT is actually breaking their own marketing code of conduct. In Africa smoking is still considered as taboo and only 10% of the population smoke. So to make the cigarettes more popular, BAT is targeting the young people of African countries like Nigeria, Malawi and Mauritius. To stop the unethical practice, Chris Proctor, head of science and Regulation at BAT blow the whistle against the company. Two types of influencing factors helped him to make such decision .The influencing factors are-

← Individual Factors-The unique characteristics of Mr. Proctor that actually helped him to make relevant decision

← Situational Factors- The particular features of the surrounding environment that influence him to make judgment about what is right or wrong.

Individual influences in Mr. Proctor’s decision making:

← Education and Employment: Mr. Proctor was an educated person that reflects through his ethical decision making. Previously he had worked for a NGO for 10 years and there he also made ethical decisions. In BAT he was working as the head of Science and Regulation and he was worried about the unethical practice of BAT. So he threatened his company to act ethically but the company did not response. Finally he made his decision to talk to the media.

← National and cultural characteristics:

People from different cultural background have different national, cultural or religious out look towards an issue. Mr. Proctor was a West African and he had his own values, beliefs regarding ethical decision making. Few factors influences him to build such values; like

Collectivism: As Mr. Proctor was a West African so he was worried about African people and try to save them from the danger of different diseases.

Power Distance: BAT is an organization where power distance is practiced. Although Mr. Proctor was the head of Science and Regulation but he had not enough power to influence the decision of the company. Many times he protested against the unethical practice of BAT but the board did not pay any attention.

Uncertainty Avoidance: Mr. Proctor scores low in uncertainty avoidance as he took the risk of his professional life and protest against his own company.

← Psychological Factors:

Post –conventional: Mr. Proctor had the personality who does the things that they think they should do. As he thought that BAT was doing unethical thing by targeting young people and selling single sticks of cigarettes to make it more popular. So, he decided to protest and finally he spoke with the media.

Locus of control: Mr. Proctor was an internal locus person because he belief that he had control over his life. He knows that if he raises voice then he can do something for the well being of the African countries. As BAT was promoting cigarettes in a wrong manner so he decided to whistle blow and safe the African nations.

← Personality Integrity and Moral Imagination:

High Personal Integrity: Mr. Proctor had high personal integrity because he sticks to his decision to protest against the unethical business of BAT. The practice that BAT follows will hamper the well being of African people in the long run. So, for the sake of the society he took the risk of his professional life.

Moral imagination: Mr. Proctor had high moral imagination power. He knew that if he did not whistle blow about the unethical business of BAT then it will expand and in the long run destroy the young generation of African countries. So, he blew the whistle against his own company

Situational influences on Mr. Proctor’s decision making:

← Moral Intensity: The moral intensity of Mr. Proctor’s decision depends on six factors:

Magnitude of consequences: The magnitude of BAT action was massive. As they were targeting young people so even children of 11 years also started smoking and the smoking related diseases increased drastically. The smoking related death in Africa was 100,000 a year, but that figure would increase to double in the next 20 years. So, magnitude of consequences is very high in the African society.

Social consensus: The social consensus was very high because BAT‘s unethical business bring a change in the African society. People were highly affected by the unethical decision so Mr. Proctor had raise his voice to protect the African countries.

Probability of effect: The probability of effect was very high because the BAT unethical work was creating many social problems. Smoking became a habit among the young generation and the smoking related death also increases.

Temporal immediacy: The temporal immediacy of the BAT‘s action had low score because they made the African people habituated to smoking gradually. It will effect the society in the long run.

Proximity: Mr. Proctor’s proximity was higher as he was a West African so he wanted to protect his own natives. The unethical practices of BAT was gradually destroying the young generation of African countries so Mr. Proctor try to stand besides those affected people.

Concentration of effect: The unethical work of BAT was hampering the life of African young people. As the concentration of effect was higher so BAT continue their business without showing any interest to Mr. Proctor’s protest.

← Moral Framing: ▪ Moral muteness- Image of power and effectiveness: To protect his own native people, Mr. Proctor did not thought about the image of his own company. He took the risk and protest in the media about the unethical work of BAT.. ← Bureaucracy: BAT follows the formal structure of decision making. The top management took most of the decisions whether it would be ethical or unethical. Although Mr. Proctor tried to warn his management to stop the unethical practice but they did not show any interest. ← Work roles and organizational norms: ▪ Organizational norm and culture: BAT has their own organizational norm and culture. They have separate marketing code but they were not following the code in African countries like Nigeria, Malawi and Mauritius. Although Mr.Proctor protested against their violation of code but they continue their business. ← National and cultural context : African cultural context is different from other western culture. Although smoking is widely accepted in western countries but in African countries it is still considered as taboo. But BAT marketed their cigarettes in such a way that the young generation of African countries get addicted to it. So, the number of smoking related death increasing every year in African nations. It has been estimated that this problem will increase to double in next 20 years. So, being a West African Mr. Proctor tried his best to save the African people from the danger of smoking. So, all the above factors influence Mr. Proctor to protest in front of media and help the African people.

Q 4. What could be done for increasing the effectiveness of BAT’s marketing code?

British American Tobacco operates in an industry where their product itself is harmful for their customers. So, in order to design and implement their marketing program more effective and non-questionable, BAT should design their marketing program in a more ethical concern way. We may list those activities as following-

• British American Tobacco must stop selling their products to younger people who are less than 18 years old. They can achieve this goals by the following way-

o Stop selling Cigarettes in a stick rather than in a packet because it will make the purchase of Cigarette more difficult for the younger people.

o Sales outlet needs to be chosen selectively. They must not choose any outlet which is near to any school, college or children park.

• British American Tobacco can enforce some educational seminars like awareness about the danger of smoking, parents’ attitude and behavior of smoking especially in front of their children etc.

• Their promotional activities are some what lucrative to their unhealthy product. They should position their product only for adults while at the same time disclosing all the information regarding the harmfulness of their product. The company must not target the younger generations for their products.

• Any sorts of celebrity associations should be avoided because people specially the younger ones get attracted to these celebrity attitude and behavior.

• The branding of the company like painting of shops with the same color, attractive packaging allures people to their product. But company like British American Tobacco must avoid these sorts of activities.

• British American Tobacco can position themselves in the mind of consumer as a socially responsible company which will enhance their brand equity. They must avoid positioning themselves as a lucrative and glamorous brand.


Similar Documents

Free Essay

Business Ethics Case

...Business Ethics Case Kristin Smith BUS/415 February 27, 2012 Business Ethics Case The National Enquirer is a tabloid newspaper known for its gossip about celebrities, scandals, and other Hollywood drama. The difference between the National Enquirer and newspapers is that the National Enquirer is mostly based on rumors and famous scandals. Newspapers are more responsible journalism that tells the facts. Sold in almost every grocery store, gas station, and local convenience store, the National Enquirer has been around since the 1920s based in Florida. In the earlier days, the National Enquirer was famous for fabricating weird and unbelievable stories to gain sales. Such stories may have included 'My Baby has Three Eyes' or 'I had King Kong's Baby.' Today, the National Enquirer mostly reports on the latest celebrity gossip. Recently, the National Enquirer received bad publicity because of the picture of deceased singer Whitney Houston posted on the front page in her casket. According to the case Calder vs. Jones, the National Enquirer published a story about Shirley Jones that had a devastating impact on her life in California. Due to most of the National Enquirer's circulation existing in California, it was unethical for the National Enquirer to avoid suit in California. Just because the reporter and the editor who wrote and edited the story reside in Florida, the emotional damages were done to her in California. The defamation and invasion of her......

Words: 413 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Business Law Ethics Case

...utilitarianism. * Kantian Ethics Based on Kantian Ethics, the duty of the radio station is to gain listeners by letting listeners enjoy listening to the radio station and also have a higher rating as compared to other radio stations. To be morally permissible, the rule: ‘if I were to broadcast this prank call, I will be able to entertain listeners and gain higher ratings.’ is able to conform to the categorical imperative of universal acceptability (Low, 2013). We can will this to be universal because that is the duty of a radio station and universally, anyone with the duty of a radio station will accept this rule. But by broadcasting the prank call does not conform to the second imperative of respect which is using the nurse as the focus of the prank call to entertain the listeners of the radio (Low, 2013). The duty of the nurse is to take care of patients and administrative work in the hospital. She would have no link to the entertainment industry, unlike music which the main purpose or duty is for entertainment, radio station will be able to use music as a mean to entertain listeners and still conform to the imperative of respect. Thus the nurse is simply the means of the duty to entertain listeners if the radio station were to broadcast the prank call. Therefore by only conforming to the imperative of universal acceptability and not conforming to the imperative of respect, the radio station should not broadcast the prank call. * Virtue Ethics The virtue......

Words: 1378 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Business Ethics Case

...Business Ethics Case Tina M. Drinka BUS/415 March 12, 2012 Rob Tischer, J.D., M.A. Business Ethics Case Discussed in this paper is the case of Calder v. Jones, 465 United States 783, 1984. Respondent Shirley Jones filed suit in California Superior Court against the National Enquirer claiming libel. Petitioners are South the reporter who wrote the article for the National Enquirer, and Calder who holds the position of president and editor of the National Enquirer. What Kind of Paper is National Enquirer? The Enquirer/Star Group, Inc. is a holding company for many best selling supermarket tabloids founded in 1926, by William Radolph Hearst, known at that time as the New York Enquirer (Randall, 1986). Generoso Pope, Jr. purchased the paper in 1952 utalizing his marketing skills to introduce the paper into supermarkets during the 1970s (Randall, 1986). The group’s shining star is the National Enquirer with a weekly circulation of seven million when combined with the Star and only TV Guide has a higher weekly circulation. The National Enquirer, Inc. principally based in Florida, publishing a weekly magazine distributed nationally with a total circulation exceeding five million. Approximately 600,000 copies circulate in California, which is twice the total of the next largest circulation market. Avoiding Suit in California Petitioner South, the reporter who wrote the article in question, lives in Florida, but travels on business to......

Words: 755 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Business Ethics Case

...Running Head: Business Ethics Case Business Ethics Case Student Name BUS/415 Business Law Date Instructor Name Business Ethics Case The National Enquirer, Inc. is a corporation with its principal place of business in Florida. It publishes the National Enquirer, a national weekly newspaper with a total circulation of more than 5 million copies. About 600,000 copies, almost twice the level in the next highest state, are sold in California. Jones, an entertainer and also a California resident, filed a lawsuit in California state court against the National Enquirer and its president, who was a resident of Florida because The National Enquirer published an article about Shirley Jones. The damages for alleged defamation, invasion of privacy, and intentional infliction of emotional distress were filed in a lawsuit by California. Calder v. Jones, 465 U.S. 783, 104 S.Ct. 1482, 79 L.Ed.2d 804, Web 1984 U.S. Lexis 4 (Supreme Court of the United States) What kind of paper is the National Enquirer? The National Enquirer is involved in giving exaggerated stories such as personal life or any scandal of any celebrity or news which create sensation and arise curiosity. It is a tabloid magazine and its main focus is on celebrity news and gossip. It is not considered credible because of its exaggeration. Despite of all this company has a strong base and standing. As per Funding Universe (n.d.), there are 1,331 employees with the Enquirer’s holding company,...

Words: 668 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Business Ethics Case

...Business Ethics Case 3.5 3.5 Business Ethics The National Enquirer, Inc., is a Florida corporation with its principal place of business in Florida. It publishes the National Enquirer, a national weekly newspaper with a total circulation of more than 5 million copies. About 600,000 copies, almost twice the level in the next highest state, are sold in California. The National Enquirer published an article about Shirley Jones, an entertainer. Jones, a California resident, filed a lawsuit in California state court against the National Enquirer and its president, who was a resident of Florida. The California lawsuit sought damages for alleged defamation, invasion of privacy, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Calder v. Jones, 465 U.S. 783, 104 S.Ct. 1482, 79 L.Ed.2d 804, Web 1984 U.S. Lexis 4 (Supreme Court of the United States) 1. What kind of paper is the National Enquirer? After researching many peer-reviewed sources within the University Library and other websites, I hate to use the Wiki, however, it seems to be the only website that gives a description of the National Enquirer I also find to be accurate. Even the National Enquirer website lacks any type of description. The Wiki states that “the National Enquirer is an American supermarket tabloid…currently well-known for exaggerating, as well as fabricating in its articles focusing on celebrity news, gossip, and crime in order to sell its newspapers” (Wikipedia, 2010, p. 1). Indeed, I have always......

Words: 585 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Business Ethics Case Studies

...pregnant or returning from maternity leave (Marx 2011, p. 1). Subsequently, both employees have initiated legal action against Virgin Blue who ‘has denied any wrongdoing and vowed to fight the claims’ (Marx 2011, p. 2). The article raises three ethical issues. Firstly, it addresses the expectation that businesses should not discriminate against employees on the basis of gender (Ferrell, Fraedrich & Ferrell 2009, p. 70). Secondly, it highlights that abusive or intimidating behaviour is not acceptable in the workplace (Ferrell, Fraedrich & Ferrell 2009, p. 64). Thirdly, it identifies the role that an effective ethics program can play in avoiding ethical and legal problems (Ferrell, Fraedrich & Ferrell 2009, p. 212). Businesses should not discriminate against employees on the basis of gender. Discrimination refers to ‘the making of a difference in particular cases, as in favour of or against a person or thing, especially when arising from prejudice based on race, ethnicity, sex, religion, age etc’ (Discrimination 2011). Virgin Blue allegedly discriminated against Leonie Vandeven by forcing her to take a redundancy package after she confirmed that she was pregnant (Marx 2011, p. 2). Vandeven was made redundant despite receiving a performance review, which rated her as ‘highly effective’ (Marx 2011, p. 2). Similarly, Kirsty Aitken was forced to take a redundancy package after returning from maternity leave (Marx 2011, p. 2). The female employees ‘had worked together as......

Words: 4129 - Pages: 17

Premium Essay

Business Ethics Case Study

...Business Ethics Case Study Peter Paulson's offer to provide the previous case documents to Steven Craig is professionally unethical but morally permissible. In addition, I believe that the offer was not theft but possession by entitlement and permission. His actions are a great example of how professional ethics and morals don't always align in the analysis of a case. Part (1) Peter Paulson's offer although helpful commits the Texas Board of Professional Engineers code. As an expert witness for a previous case against PPC, Peter Paulson was exposed to certain documents which would help with the current case against the same company. The code states in 137.63.c.4 that "The engineer shall not give, offer or promise to pay or deliver, directly or indirectly, any commission, gift, favor, gratuity, benefit, or reward as an inducement to secure any specific engineering work or assignment." In Peter's case he was asked to "secure specific engineering work" for a fee. The practice of sharing the public documents is legal and professionally ethical but when a fee is procured for the transaction the act becomes unethical. The documents in both cases were public because they were documents of court which could be obtained by any lawyer. When Peter placed a fee on documents that were public his actions were in violation of the code and made his offer professionally unethical. Part (II) Table 1. Line drawling of "The Offer" showing non-theft (Peter's perspective)......

Words: 1353 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Business Ethics Case

...Business Ethics Case Shirley Jones is resident entertainer of California that has filed suit against National Enquirer, Inc., along with its president. Jones filed her complaint in the California courts with intent to sue for multiple damages of defamation, privacy, and emotional distress against the national newspaper. In this paper I will attempt to answer the question from the reading of section 3.5. The National Enquirer is a weekly tabloid that was founded in 1926 by William Radolph Hearst. In 1952 the paper was purchased by Generoso Pope, Jr. who then used strategic marketing skills by establishing the paper into supermarket shelves across the country in the 1970's. Pope's strategic marketing skills led to the papers success by being an attention grabber. The question at hand is if National Enquirer should try to avoid suit in California, but is really an ethical decision that needs to be considered by National Enquirer. The Defendant National Enquirer, Inc., is located in Florida and plaintiff Shirley Jones in California, two different states; however suit can be determined by the courts; are there "minimum contacts" with the foreign state by jurisdiction (Quisi in rem) a plaintiff who obtains a judgment against a defendant in one state will try to collect the judgment by attaching property of the defendant that is located in another state (Cheeseman, 2010). Generally, the requirement of minimum contacts means that the defendant has to have taken actions that......

Words: 357 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Business Ethics Cases

...1. Nike: From Sweatshops to Leadership in Employment Practices 2. Starbuck’ mission: Social responsibility and brand strength 3. New Belgium Breweries: Ethical and Environmental Responsibilities  You will be required to answer to the end of case questions. I expect personal opinion, don’t try to copy from a template somewhere Test 2: StarBuck Case 2 Starbucks’ Mission: Social Responsibility and Brand Strength Case Notes for Instructors: Students will likely have strong opinions regarding Starbucks. Many may be committed patrons who view Starbucks as a socially responsible company committed to green practices and free-trade coffee. Others might dislike Starbucks because it is a large chain that pushes out smaller local competitors. Another possible reason students may be opposed to Starbucks are its prices, which are higher than many of its competitors. Starbucks seems to be able to justify its higher prices because the company sells more than just coffee—it sells an experience. Starbucks patrons can order specialty drinks and hang out in what founder Howard Schultz envisioned to be the “third place” to be after home and work. Love it or hate it, Starbucks has been very successful at branding. Starbucks has had a profound influence on the U.S. coffee market. Before Starbucks came onto the scene, people perceived coffee as an uninteresting product largely consumed by older people in the United States. It did not have the “cool” factor or the cache that it......

Words: 2934 - Pages: 12

Free Essay

Cases in Business Ethics

...completed a preliminary evaluation of a property for Watson & Musico, which is one of NCR’s major developers and property owners. However, John Mortimer from Watson & Musico is unsatisfied with the Richard’s evaluation price, he asks Richard to raise the value, otherwise they have no business. This situation is difficult for Richard, because he wants to satisfy John’s needs, but at the same time, he can’t ignore the ethical issue to do that.  Stakeholders Richard Romano is a principal of CGR, and he is an Accredited Appraiser Canadian Institute (AACI) candidate. Richard has eight years of experience and is recognized as one of Canada’s leading real estate experts. He wants to complete the appraisal according to his best estimate of the current market value of the property, but he can’t afford losing business with Watson & Musico (WM) for not satisfying their needs. Success in project with WM will be a major boost to CGR, it is also Richard’s responsibility to keep his client’s interest in mind. Anyway, he wants to satisfy his client’s needs without breaking his image of profession. John Mortimer controls WM and he is well known in the NCR for his abrasive style and aggressive approach in business dealings. Because of the depressed real estate market and WM’s aggressive leasing policy, WM have a highly restricted cash flow. So WM plan to refinance all of its properties to reduce debt service requirements and to generate cash. While John feels Richard’s evaluation......

Words: 1429 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Business Ethics Case

...University of Phoenix Business Ethics Case BUS/415 Carrie Miranda Derk Adams January 7, 2011 1. What kind of paper is the National Enquirer? National Enquirer is a supermarket tabloid founded in 1926; founded William Radolph Hearst. In 1926 the paper was known as New York Enquirer and then purchased in 1952 by Generoso Pope, Jr. Pope purchased the paper and used strategic marketing skills by establishing the paper into supermarkets racks across the country in the 70's. Pope knew the paper to be successful he needed to pay the highest pay to top notch reporters and editors to produce, write, and manage the paper to be the best in its field. This practice may not result in writing what always measures up to the journalistic standards of a magazine such as People, it does allow the Enquirer to cover a broad range of topics, and it enables timely responses to events that often result in news scoops . The success of Pope's strategic marketing skills not everyone found this paper to be tactful and find it offensive; however, the papers success is successful from being an attention grabber, loud and graphic. Provides the top hot news of the media and provides the readers information they may not find anywhere else as forward as they provide the information. 2. Was it ethical for the National Enquirer to try to avoid suit in California? . In the case under discussion, the Petitioners wrote and edited an article, containing slanderous material about the respondent,......

Words: 637 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Merck Case - Business Ethic

...stakes for Roy Vagelos as CEO would be the high level of risk to succeed, the strong change to have a low level of profitability even after the success, and the advantage of Dr Campbell’s project, less investment needed and government aid in tax. And the stakes for Merck as a company would be the corporate ethic it has pursued and Merck’s need to develop another new successful prescription. Q2. How does Merck pick from among the many ways to “do good” and many drugs to invest in? Merck took 12 years and $200 million to bring a new drug to market on the average. And thousands of scientists worked on new ideas and following new leads. It uses various methods to choose the project through extensive review and analysis on the basis of the likelihood of success, the existing market, competition, potential safety problems, manufacturing feasibility and patent. Q3. How much of its research budget should Merck invest in drugs that will likely produce a substandard return on its investment? The research budget should be considered in research/development expenses, expected income with the tax benefit from the government, and mostly the effect and impact based on the corporate ethics and morale. Q4. What should Merck tell a shareholder who might complain about a decision to invest in research on river blindness? The overall corporate philosophy of Merck is based on the idea that medicine is for the people and never for the profits as the profits follow. And the......

Words: 336 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Business Ethics Case

...encouraged to be eco-friendly by protecting the environment. Emphasis on businesses to protect the environment is strongly encouraged, because the greatest damage done to the environment has been inflicted by the business industry. Businesses’ don’t consciously set out to harm the environment, but they try to invent products to comfort human beings. These products were not originally in nature and therefore have some effects on nature such as air and water pollution, toxic contamination, deforestation, and others. Therefore, it is relevant for organizations to engage in proper product safety measures whenever engaging in any stage of the product life cycle. From an ethical point of view, businesses are expected to provide safe products for consumers and should be held morally responsible for damages, complications, or death caused by the use of such products. Such effects can have a negative impact on consumers, shareholders, the business, and the life of the company. When the product of an organization is safe, then consumers will help publicize the product, which is good for business and its shareholders to make a profit and gain dividends. When the product is not safe, upon consuming the product, and damages, complications, or death occurs, and is publicized, the business will have a down-turning effect in sales, profits, and drop in share value on the market. . Product safety should be a high priority for all organizations, throughout the Caribbean and Jamaica. This is......

Words: 1270 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Business Ethics Case

...Business Ethics Case Lauren Kendall BUS415 February 23, 2011 Neha Bhatia Business Ethics Case The National Enquirer, Inc. is a Florida corporation with its principal place of business in Florida. It publishes the National Enquirer, a national weekly newspaper with a total circulation of more than five million copies. About 600,000 copies, almost twice the level in the next highest state, are sold in California. The National Enquirer published an article about Shirley Jones, an entertainer. Jones, a California resident, filed a lawsuit in California state court against the National Enquirer and its president, who was a resident of Florida. The California lawsuit sought damages for alleged defamation, invasion of privacy, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The National Enquirer is a nationwide magazine, which is known as a tabloid or newspaper that often prints inaccurate news or stories about other people. The magazine is reckless and takes no interest in how their dishonesty affects the people behind the articles. As an entertainer, Shirley Jones resides, and works in her hometown California. The National Enquirer made the decision to publish an article about Shirley Jones containing unsupported material about the actress being an alcoholic. Even though the article was written, edited, and published in Florida, Shirley Jones filed a lawsuit in California. The National Enquirer attempted to challenge the case because they......

Words: 720 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Business Ethics Case

...Business Ethics Case Garrett Chilson BUS/415 BUSINESS LAW Jeremy Claridge MAEd, JD June 13, 2012 Would you sew the National Enquirer for writing false evidence that would affect your personal life and emotional health? That is a tough question. Celebrities are used to the gossip that goes on around them and most of them have learned how to deal with these kind of false rumors. The issue becomes when a lot of the private life of the celebrity is written on newspapers like the National Enquirer, which give light to all of the celebrities’ personal issues that go on from time to time. This is when big issues occur because it can have a major impact on a celebrities’ life if this information is harmful. The National Enquirer is a newspaper, which focuses mainly on gossip and entertainment. (, 2011) It is a newspaper, which talks about the lives of all the Hollywood stars and sometimes even adds some false information to make the newspaper sound a bit more interesting. Its main targeted audience are people, usually women, who are interested in finding out what is going on in the famous celebrity lives. 

This issue occurred with an entertainer whose life was exposed on an article that the National Enquirer wrote. The entertainer was not pleases and decided to place a lawsuit......

Words: 501 - Pages: 3