Free Essay

The Groupthink Theory

In: Psychology

Submitted By blaine
Words 1199
Pages 5
The Groupthink Theory
“Researchers have studied the influence of group pressure on individual members” (Byars and Rue, 2007, 238).
As defined by Byars and Rue “when group members lose their ability to think as individuals and conform at the expense of their good judgment, groupthink occurs. Members become unwilling to say anything against the group or any member, even if an action is wrong” (Byars and Rue, 2007, 238).
“Keeping a group together under any circumstance is a goal in itself. Groups with this goal believe that the group is indestructible and always right. Group members justify any action, stereotype outsiders as enemies of the group, and pressure unwilling members to conform (Byars and Rue, 2007, 238).

In 1972, Irving L. Janis presented a set of hypothesis that he extracted from observing small groups performing problem-solving tasks; he collectively referred to these hypotheses as groupthink (Janis, 1972).
He defined groupthink as “a quick and easy way to refer to a mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members’ strivings for unanimity override their motivation to realistically appraise alternative courses of action” (Janis, 1982, 9). Groups are usually successful because group members bring varied ideas, collective knowledge, and they tend to be focused while working together. Groups can be advantageous to both individuals and businesses. They are valuable to individuals because they are able to learn new skills, get feedback from others, and recognize their own strengths and weaknesses. The most important function of groups for businesses is to accomplish tasks that individuals cannot do on their own. The Bay of Pigs invasion, Nixon’s Watergate cover-up, and the Challenger space shuttle explosion are examples of situations where group communication failed. Groupthink can lead to bad judgments and decisions being made. This paper will look at the conditions, the indicators or symptoms, and the ways to counteract groupthink.
The conditions for groupthink to happen are important to recognize. When a homogenous, highly cohesive group is only concerned with maintaining unanimity, they fail to evaluate all their alternatives and options. It is obvious that a group suffers from groupthink when the group feels apathetic about its task; group members do not expect to be successful; one group member has very high credibility---group members tend to believe what he or she says; one group member is very persuasive; and group members do not usually challenge ideas; it is expected that group members will agree with one another (Beebe, Beebe, and Ivy, 2001, 282). The members also see themselves as part of an in-group working as an out-group opposed to their goals. The Challenger space shuttle disaster is what can happen when groupthink occurs. Stress can also be a condition that allows for groupthink to take place. As group members realize that immense external and internal pressures come with their task, the level of stress rises. The desire to reduce the stress motivates the members to come to an outcome quickly. Effective groups need to have clear goals, mutual trust among all participants, accountability shared by everyone, external support, and training.
There are many indicators or symptoms that groupthink could be happening in a decision-making process. Groups dominated by groupthink tend to make unethical decisions when compared to the decisions that could have been reached using a fair, open, and rational decision-making process. Many groups have an illusion of invulnerability and they think that they are not capable of being wrong. When the group believes that they are doing the right thing in all circumstances and that it is best for everyone, then they are showing inherent morality. Groups are often close-minded about the situation that is occurring. They ignore the information that does not back up the opinions of the group members. This occurred with the Challenger because the scientists from one group were telling the others to delay the launch. There had been pressure from all around to launch the space shuttle that they did not listen to the scientists and cause seven lives to be lost in the disaster. When any of these occur in a group, changes must be made to ensure that it will not happen in the future.
There are many practices that can help prevent groupthink from happening.
One way of preventing groupthink is to make each member of the group a “critical evaluator” (Janis 1982, 262).
Group members will make an effort to find problems in-group situations by evaluating them individually. The leader must accept criticism if this is to work (Janis, 1982). Problems can appear because the leader feels that there is not centralized control within the group. Another solution is to have many different groups work on the same problem under separate leaders (Janis, 1982). Every group would come up with different ideas, and the pressure to agree with each other is not as great. Sometimes group members are more comfortable with sharing their disagreement in a smaller group than in a larger group (Beebe et al., 2001, 283). The problem with this is that information is likely to become known if more people are aware of the situation. Groups that take this approach are less likely to be locked into one solution. Another alternative solution is to assign someone to be a devil’s advocate—to look for disadvantages to a proposed idea. This strategy is especially useful if no one offers any disagreement about a position (Beebe et al, 2001, 283). The devil’s advocate must also be willing to vocally share their ideas with the rest of the group to force them to take a second look at the decision that they made. The ways that groupthink are prevented are very important because it can eliminate some future fatal mistakes if it is taken seriously. The plan of one person is more likely to be inconsistent than the plan of a group. The more people contributing their opinions will help the group put together a creative and inclusive plan.
I have been a part of many different types of groups and I believe that the best way to avoid groupthink is to have an understanding and recognition of the symptoms. Groups are useful and necessary in many different situations. If groups were not a part of business or school, then the only people who would have a say in the dealing of matters would be the chief person in charge. All the decisions that were made would be made to benefit themselves. Effective teams avoid groupthink by striving for group diversity—in age, gender, backgrounds, experience, and training. They encourage open discussion, search for relevant information, evaluate many alternatives, consider how a decision will be implemented, and plan for contingencies in case the decision does not work out (Guffey, 2000, 40). Groupthink is a dilemma that can have devastating consequences. Good communication skills are crucial for any results to occur. If group members are aware and frequently checking for it, the negative effects can be avoided. If members are not made aware of the groupthink dilemma, then it can limit the significance of groups and make them ineffective.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Comm Theory

...Critiquing the Theory of Groupthink Communication Theory, COMM 25902 Professor Ponder April 13, 2010 Groupthink is a common method of deliberating used by members in a group in order to reduce conflict and promote unanimity. People are often unwilling to share conflicting viewpoints to a group of those who hold the same perspective on a subject. Irving Janis developed Groupthink while studying foreign policy decision-making. In doing so, he maintained that when group members share a common fate, there is great pressure towards conformity (Amidon, 2005). Following the initial theorization of Groupthink, researchers continued to study the patterns of those involved in-group discussion. According to Henningsen, Henningsen, Eden and Cruz (2006), despite the widespread acceptance of groupthink as a theory, it has never been fully backed by lab research. Researchers began examining inconsistencies between Janis’s model and the results found in a lab setting. In testing the theory in a lab, researchers hoped to provide an explanation for why lab tests produced different results than case studies for the same occurrence. In the past, researchers have tended to study limited components of the groupthink model, which includes antecedents, concurrence seeking, symptoms, decision-making defects and poor decision outcomes. Studies that examine this full model or large parts of it have produced a set of interesting findings concerning the symptoms of groupthink.......

Words: 1109 - Pages: 5

Free Essay


...The term "groupthink" was a theory developed by psychologist Irving Janis. The theory was intended to explain bad decisions and outcomes made by governments and businesses, which Janis sometimes called "fiascoes." (Vore, 2013) He was really interested in situations where pressure with the group seemed to result in a failure to think clearly. Janis defined groupthink as "a quick and easy way to refer to a mode of thinking people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unanimity override their motivation to realistically appraise alternative courses of action. Groupthink refers to a deterioration of mental efficiency, reality testing, and moral judgment that results from in-group pressures." (Groupthink, 2013) Groupthink can occur when a group of people disagrees with their boss and want to create conflict in the face of the powerful boss. The idea of groupthink offers an explanation of reasons that groups sometimes make poor decisions. Groups are thought to be better at making complex decisions than individuals because they contain a variety of different views. (Vore, 2013) Groups not only bring new ideas into the discussion but also can act as device to correct errors. Groups can also provide social support which is very important when creating new ideas. This issue with groupthink comes when new viewpoints are not accepted. Even though groups can work to support effective conclusions, the same processes that boost the......

Words: 756 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Teams and Individuals

...Managing the Work of Teams and Individuals Thomas Wingham 8th December 2011 Contents * Introduction * Groupthink * Causes * Remedies * General Group Problem Solving (GGPS) Model * Risky Shift Phenomenon * Causes * Remedies * Conclusion * Recommendations * Reference List * Appendices Introduction In this report there will be an evaluation of Groupthink. Janis eight causes of Groupthink and what the remedies are. Aldag and Fuller’s model of groupthink and how it is different from Janis’s model. There will also be an evaluation of Risky Shift Phenomenon, this will include the causes and the remedies of Risky Shift Phenomenon. Groupthink Irving Janis says Groupthink occurs when “a group makes faulty decisions because group pressures lead to a deterioration of “mental efficiency, reality testing, and moral judgment”” (Janis, pg 9.) Groupthink - Causes According to Janis there are eight causes of Groupthink. Illusion of invulnerability; creates too much confidence that encourages extreme risks. Collective rationalization; members warned about something but do not take any notice. Belief in inherent morality; members believe in their goal and ignore all moral consequences. Stereotyped views of out-groups; negative views of enemy make effective responses to conflict seem unnecessary. Direct pressure on dissenters; members cannot argue with group views without being under pressure. Self-censorship;......

Words: 1761 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay


...making these decision sometimes members of the team tend to agree with each other with out considering other factors and alternatives. This paper outlines Irving Janis’ theory of “groupthink”, which explains how group mentality can stifle effective decision-making. Groupthink is the phenomena whereby the cohesiveness of groups leads to peer pressure which inhibits debate and encourages self-censorship (Janis I L, 1982). As a result, alternative solutions and the implications of certain decisions are not fully explored. There are a number of ways in which this type of mentality can be countered, leading to more effective decision- making. Armed with these strategies, groups will be able to make the best decisions, benefitting from the diversity of perspectives a team brings and managing the disadvantages of groupthink. Since Irving Janis first presented the outline of his theory of groupthink, the theory has received a great deal of attention. According to Janis, groups experiencing groupthink reach poor decisions because group members try to conform and avoid deviation, hampering critical thinking. Groupthink may result in an incomplete survey of objectives, inadequate research, limited discussion alternatives, and a failure to examine significant costs and risks of preferred alternatives. In other words, Groupthink occurs when a person's thought process and decision-making capabilities become influenced by peer pressure. This may cause the group to overestimate their......

Words: 296 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay


...How to Avoid Groupthink We like people that agree with us; it makes us feel good. But there is a condition that develops when likeminded people agree and reaffirm each other’s decisions and beliefs. It’s called groupthink. It’s a term that was coined by psychologist Irving Janis. Per (2011), groupthink is defined as “Tendency of the members of a group to yield to the desire for consensus or unanimity at the cost of considering alternative courses of action.” Thompson, (2008) states, “Groupthink occurs when team members place consensus above all other priorities” (p. 172). Groupthink has been identified as a contributing factor to many political and corporate events including the 2002 US invasion of Iraq, the Bay of Pigs, and the AMA allowing Sunbeam to use their name for product endorsement (Thompson, 2008). The next few paragraphs describe five different methods for avoiding groupthink. One method for avoiding groupthink is Devil’s Advocate. This is a role that can be assigned to a member of the group. Harris (2010) wrote, “This should be a different person for each meeting” (para. 5). Implementing this responsibility will aid in identifying risks in the decision making process as well as arguing against the proposed group solution or decision. Ultimately this position would help create more alternative solutions and spawn the idea creativity of the group. What’s important with this role is that the opposing position be genuine......

Words: 784 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Group Think Research Paper

...What is Group Think The term “groupthink” was created by Irving Janis (Moorhead et al. 1998)Irving Janis would describe groupthink as a “mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members’ strivings for unanimity override their motivation to realistically appraise alternative courses of action.” Janis (1972, p. 9) Janis theory would suggest that, members of a group may adopt an idea as an answer to problems without thinking about it appropriately, to acquire approval of the group and its members. Groupthink does not result in failure of decisions but if a board falls subject, the chances of unethical, low quality decision within the origination become increased. In 1975, the term had been registered in...

Words: 934 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

“the Application of Both Goal Setting and Expectancy Theory Principles Help to Enhance Employee Performance”. to What Extent Do You Agree with This Statement?

...Process theories are theories of motivation that emphasizes on how we make choices with respect to goals. Content theories concern with ‘what’ motivates people while process theories concern with ‘how’ motivation occurs. Major process theories include expectancy theory, goal setting theory and equity theory. I agree to the notion that application of goal setting and expectancy theory will improve employee performance to a certain extent. In this essay, the application of goal setting and expectancy theories in real life and the possible limitations of the theories will be discussed. “Goal setting theory is a process theory of motivation which argues that work motivation is influenced by goal difficulty, goal specificity, and knowledge of results.” (Locke, 1968) According to goal setting theory, challenging goals can result in higher performance as compared to monotonous goals as most of the jobs can be dull, hence by accomplishing challenging goals will lead to sense of fulfilment from the employee. Besides, specific goals will stimulate higher level of performance than vague goals such as ‘do your best’. Feedback on past performance is also crucial as employees will appreciate the manger’s interest in their success and always know what is expected of them. Thus, it is common for an organization to apply goal setting theory as in most cases it will bring about positive results. An experiment was conducted with a company involved in loading of logging trucks (Latham......

Words: 1203 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Groupthink And The Bystander Effect Essay

... no one would guess that this town holds a dark tradition. One that has the townsfolk gather every June 27 to carry out. The people of this town gather and watch while the male heads of the family draw a piece of paper from the black box, once this is completed the family that has the black spot draws again to see which one of the family members it will be this year. After all of this the town’s people pick up rock previously gather and stone the winner to death. Groupthink and the bystander effect explain the behavior of the character's in Shirley Jackson's short story "The Lottery." In 1972, Irving L. Janis published a study, where he defined groupthink as an “excessive form of concurrence-seeking among members of high prestige, tightly knit policy-making groups (and their being part of it) higher than anything else” (Hart 247). In “The Lottery”, we see this part of Irving’s theory demonstrated in the fact that Mr. Summer, who organizes all the main events of the town, is in full support of the lottery. The theory is further demonstrated by the support of old man Warner. “This causes them to strive for a quick and...

Words: 833 - Pages: 4

Free Essay


...together is success”. Henry Ford. Teamwork is an intention of different people to work together for specific purpose in order to achieve the same aim. Team works are needed everywhere in all aspects of society. Also, teamwork is made to gather people who are interested in one thing, who have complementary skills, negotiable and who feel responsibility towards each other when doing the tasks that are spread between team members. Saying about the Role concept within teamwork it was firstly used to understand people’s behaviors in the environment. Relating Belbin’s theory of teamwork and team roles there are several types of roles that people in the team belong to. They are divided into three groups: Action makers, Social and Thinking oriented. Personally, every team member is important in the process of team work and the personality of every team member is affected to the team’s effectiveness. According to Belbin’s theory the discussion process of the team work goes through four steps: • Forming; • Storming; • Norming; • Performing. Our opinion towards this constructive cycle is that if the team passes through all mentioned steps above, then in the end it appears to be successful teamwork. As the topic or issue is formed, then discussed, shared opinions about this formation among each other, negotiated the meanings of every team member and come up with the same opinion and performed together. It is mentioned that teams failures are influenced by......

Words: 611 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Lit Review

...with all of your teammates you will eventually have to work in groups. This is where the term ‘groupthink’ comes into play. Group think is thinking as a group trying not to force your own individual opinions, biases, and creativity for sakes of the group. A mentality that says the group is more important than my individual self. The research conducted over this topic will give us a better understanding of groupthink and group decision making. This research will also argue and support if groupthink is said to be positive or negative according to many scholars. According to Richard West and Lynn H. Turner in their book called ‘Introducing Communication Theory Analysis and Application’ the definition of groupthink can be defined as: “… a way of deliberating that group members use when their desire for unanimity overrides their motivation to assess all available plans of action” (West & Turner, 2014, pp. 252). Irving Janis the man who coined the term groupthink and has done extensive research over the subject gives a bit of different but similar definition, which is defined as: “a mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members’ striving for unanimity override their motivation realistically appraise alternative courses of action” (Harter, 2012, pp. 269). Most companies and organizations are heavily involved with groupthink when it comes to making critical decisions. The decisions are always made on behalf of the......

Words: 680 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Consumer Behavior- Groupthink

...Abstract This paper will give brief introduction to the deep meaning behind the word groupthink and the extent to which it is prevalent in our society today , at home, work places, institutions, entertainment places and its effect on consumer buying behavior. Then there will be an elaborate discussion on one of the well documented form of Groupthink in behavioral psychology called Bandwagon effect and its contribution in shaping consumer behavior by looking from different aspects of marketing and products. This effect relates to the spread of different beliefs among people even without any strong evidence and affects the psychology and personality of the person. This mainly helps people to identify themselves and categorize into groups which eventually become the reference group for all their behavior , adaptations and decisions. This forms the basis of the formation of groups, societies pertaining to which is a major part of the social psychology. At last but not the least some real life examples can be will be added to give insights from a practical dimension rather than just theoretical perspective to help understand and develop the idea even more. These examples will never occur to us until we try to think in this particular perspective and realize than since childhood we have been a part of them. Introduction Human being is a social animal. We cannot survive alone that is the reason that over the years they have developed thousands of such bonding and relationships...

Words: 1379 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Efforts to Improve the Performance of an Organization Is

...regard, the percentage of low-quality goods will increase. Many firms are willing to give bonuses to employees based on the quality of production relative to the quantity of production. All human beings need to be evaluated either for themselves or for their achievement. Intrinsic motivation serves to give employees the opportunity to make quality work and can be appreciated. However, it is necessary to use the reward money as an extrinsic motivator. All employees must receive both forms of reward to maximize their performance. SELECTION OF ALTERNATIVE There are two alternatives were in the megamall project. Groupthink approach has been used to carry out the selection alternative and it is kind of Soft Methods. Groupthink is a tendency in the unity of a group to seek agreement on issues in realistic assessment situations. According to the theory of groupthink, members of the group is to focus on maintaining unity in the group and they are reluctant to raise the issue that would cause discord or to provide information that...

Words: 624 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Mgmt Everest test interpersonal relationships and group dynamics by creating dissonance on both an individual and group level, as groups and group members strive to achieve both individual and group goals. This report will critically analyse the very processes used to undertake the Everest Simulation, along with results, focusing on the three concepts of ‘Communication’, ‘Groups and Teams’ and ‘Leadership’. These are of critical importance to forming an analysis of not only the simulation itself, but also a broader organisational and managerial situation and the correlation between managerial theory and practice and the Everest Simulation. The transition in dynamics within the group between the different simulations, and the solving of numerous challenges corresponds to the improvement in our results of the simulation. Moreover, this transition and triumph also elucidates the practicality of managerial theories associated with ‘communication’, ‘groups and teams’ and ‘leadership’ and their applicability to not only the Everest Simulation, my personal and group results, but also the wider contemporary managerial and organisational setting. Group Development and Performance In order for the simulation and team to successfully perform in the simulation, there...

Words: 2073 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay


...INTRODUCTION Bay of Pigs and Cuban missile crisis decisions and results are detailed as introduction to group decision making. Definitions: What Is a Group? • A group is two or more people who are interacting with each other and are interdependent in the sense that to fulfill their needs and goals, they must rely on each other. A. Why Do People Join Groups? • Baumeister and Leary (1995) argue that people join groups because in our evolutionary past, there was a substantial survival advantage to establishing bonds with other people. Consequently the need to belong may be innate and is present in all societies. • Groups have many benefits, including providing information, helping us define our identity, and establishing social norms for behavior. B. The Composition and Functions of Groups • Most social groups range in size from two to six members. • Members of a group tend to be alike in terms of age, sex, beliefs, and opinions. This is both because people are attracted to similar others and because groups operate in ways that encourage similarity among members. 1. Social Norms • Groups have social norms about which behaviors are acceptable, and the consequences of violating these are pressure to conform and ultimately rejection. 2. Social Roles • Groups also often have well-defined roles, or shared expectations in a group about how particular people are supposed to behave. Roles facilitate social interaction. • Roles also may have a cost....

Words: 3454 - Pages: 14

Free Essay

Take Home Exam

...1- Open Book Exam PHC100 – Professional Communications PHC100 Take Home Open Book Examination 1. You are a member of a decision making group at work where five people have a strong united vision, but three people including yourself, believe they are being dangerously optimistic, impulsive and misinformed. What social psychology theory of yourself and others would help you to maintain your own beliefs, and promote your minority position When working within a group in a professional context it is essential that we understand how the individuals interact with each other and the group as a whole. It is important to maintain a strong sense of integrity and professionalism especially as part of a minority where there is a desire to maintain one’s own beliefs and promote that minority position. Through the understanding and application of social psychology concepts such as a self serving bias and belief perseverance we gain an insight into an individual’s self perception and motivations. An appreciation for how these individuals interact within the group and how the group as a whole behaves can be gained via concepts of groupthink, group polarization and the power of minority influence. An understanding and the applications of these concepts will aid individuals and those within a minority to be both assertive and resilient in their own beliefs as well as promoting that minority position. A self serving bias has the effect of creating an inflated sense of self......

Words: 1543 - Pages: 7