...An Analysis of Value and Growth Investing Saint Leo University An Analysis of Value and Growth Investing This essay will define and identify the differences between value stocks and growth stocks. It will also explain the rationale that investors use for purchasing both value and growth stocks, and will identify whether value or growth investing has worked best over the long term. In addition this essay will provide incite as to which of the two investment methods I prefer and a justification for this preference and lastly will identify a recent example of someone who can be described as a value or growth investor and describe their successfulness with the method they chose. Value and Growth Stocks Defined According to our text, value stocks and market stocks are defined relative to their market-to-book ratios. A market-to-book ratio that well exceeds 1 indicates that the value of a firm’s assets exceeds their historical cost. As such, stocks with lower market-to-book ratios are classified as value stocks, while stocks with high market-to-book ratios are known as growth stocks (Berk, 2014, p. 28). When compared to stocks within a similar industry, value stocks may be lower priced and are considered more of a bargain, while growth stocks are more highly priced relative to those in their industry. Purchasing Value Stocks Versus Growth Stocks There are a variety of reasons that any investor might use to purchase a particular type of stock. Most of the reasoning...
Words: 1072 - Pages: 5
...investment is inevitably too dear, and therefore unattractive.” – John Maynard Keynes Many money managers feel they must distinguish themselves as either “growth” or “value” investors. While an apparently benign distinction, this simple act can have unintended consequences. This article will address conventional definitions of growth and value and then look to the market oracles for a dose of worldly wisdom. Value investing: The strategy of selecting stocks that trade for less than their intrinsic values. Value investors actively seek stocks of companies that they believe the market has undervalued. Growth Investing: A strategy whereby an investor seeks out stocks with what they deem good growth potential. In most cases a growth stock is defined as a company whose earnings are expected to grow at an above-average rate compared to its industry or the overall market. (Definitions taken from Investopedia) The difference between the two approaches might best be illustrated by an example at the far end of the value and growth spectrums: Take two companies with differing future prospects: Company A and Company B. Company A: Analysts love this company, and rightly so: this company has emerged as a monopoly in a new industry. Profits grow at a rate of 40% a year. In industry parlance, company A is a ‘growth stock’ Company B: This is a poor company in a poor industry. Some years it makes losses, other year’s miniscule profits. It’s barely surviving. Nevertheless...
Words: 1046 - Pages: 5
...GMO: The Value versus Growth Dilemma describes Dick Mayo’s puzzlement by the New Economy’s continuous bias toward growth-investment strategies. As one of the most celebrated value investors in the United States, he examines the basics of his philosophy versus that of a growth orientation by evaluating long-term expected returns of several value and growth stocks. The following paper was examined to pursue several objectives: (1) to define value and growth investing – where the differences lie and whether one approach is superior to the other or whether both have merit; (2) to perform basic valuations of Cisco Systems (a growth company), CVS, R.R. Donnelly and Manor Care (value companies) and to compute their long-term expected returns; and (3) to discuss issues concerning the consistency of GMO’s investment philosophy even when the market seems to run counter to it for a prolonged period of time. In this respect we will also consider the issue if value investing can still deliver significance in this New Economy or if is it only an Old Economy concept and if we would invest in GMO. Background GMO was founded in 1977 by Dick Mayo, Jeremy Grantham and Kingsley Durant. From its beginning the company applied a fundamental bottoms-up approach to institutional investing, focusing on out-of-favor, sometimes unexciting domestic companies trading below intrinsic value (U.S. Active). Throughout the 1980s and early 1990s this strategy of identifying and investing in undervalued companies...
Words: 321 - Pages: 2
...Value investing is the strategy of purchasing an asset which is trading at a significant discount from its determined intrinsic value. It has long been regarded as a low risk method of providing outstanding investment returns (Klarman 2001). The investment strategy was described by Benjamin Graham and David Dodd in their book, Security Analysis (1940, p. 724). Over subsequent decades the investment approach has evolved utilizing varying fundamental methodologies but always maintaining the principle of investing when a discount to intrinsic value exists. Graham and Dodd (1940, p. 368) referred to this principle as the 'margin of safety'. This essay will explore the various methodologies, expand on the 'margin of safety' concept and discover the factors that have led to the success of the exponents of value investing. Bierig’s (2000) assessment of the Graham and Dodd approach indicated that a value investor doesn’t just follow share market fads but instead ‘searches for stocks selling for less than their intrinsic value’ and after purchasing, waits for market recognition that corrects this discrepancy. Athanassakos (2011b) has illustrated that a search for undervalued stocks is the initial process undertaken. He maintains that these stocks tend to be ‘avoided by large institutional investors’ and are not the ‘glamour stocks everyone wants to own’. Graham (1973, p. 211) describes two methods of searching for fundamentally undervalued stocks; companies selling at a low price to...
Words: 2215 - Pages: 9
...Nike is a good fit for this portfolio and the timing could not be more perfect. First, Nike is a billion dollar company with large potential. Even though revenue has plateaued, and net income has fallen, there is potential for Nike to bounce back into a company worth investing in. For Kimi Ford, she had to decide whether it is worth investing in Nike. NorthPoint Large-Cap fund focuses on value investing. Nike has value to invest in. the management of Nike is planning on introducing new products as well as expanding on its current products. The new plans buy the company can entice investors to buy into the company. Secondly, the timing could not be better to buy Nike stock. The stock has fallen, which may turn off investors from investing in the company. The reality is that it is the best time to buy shares in Nike. The plans that Nike will implement can make the risk worthwhile to invest. The low stock price would make it easier for investors to purchase a significant amount of shares. If the gamble by Nike works out and managements plan works, the share price could sky rocket. Meaning the investors will have a good return and the company will show the success of the new product lines as well as the current products that were improved. Nike financially has ups and downs like most companies. Exhibit #1 shows: in the mid-90s; Nike had increasing revenue from $4.7 Billion in 1995 to almost 9.2 Billion in 1997. 1998 on the other had been a tough year for Nike. Its revenues increased...
Words: 524 - Pages: 3
...Stephen Choi MF602 March 12, 2013 Walnut Venture Associates (A): RBS Group Investment Memorandum The RBS Group’s business seems promising and I suggest investing $1 million in the business, exiting in three years, that is, at the end of fiscal year 2000-2001. Milestones While the business seems quite promising, there are certain milestones RBS will need to achieve in the following three years. First, within the next month RBS will have to hire a vice president who will focus on sales since its second phase will focus on increasing sales to secure market share. While the current executives of RBS have done a great job, they will need additional expertise since the sales role will switch over to newly hired sales personnel of their regional offices. Also, RBS will need to find another $1million for its next round. Since Walnut Venture Associates can only raise $1million, it is imperative that RBS find another source of funding to power through its second phase of business. Considering the prospect of RBS and its well-established relationship with big technology firms, this should not be too much of a problem. Next, RBS will have to enter the third phase of expanding its business in foreign countries should begin in the beginning of fiscal year 2000-2001. Two years after phase two, its revenue flow is projected to become more stable and cash flow turns to profit. Therefore, this seems to be the right time to enter phase three and boost up its value one last time...
Words: 847 - Pages: 4
...value of the machine is $ 800,000 (from data given). Taken into account the sales growth (2%) and volume (1%) next year, combined with the current selling price of $ 1.0235 per pound means annually the old machine will produce $ 511,750 (not taking account returned goods), while for the next four years consequently it will produce $ 516, 867.5, $ 522,036.175, and $ 527, 256.537. The current book value of machine of $800,000, coupled with $200,000 for the remaining of four years of usage (then it will be free of depreciation), means taking NPV of Hunter Plant is estimated to be $ 8.9 million. 2. If Aurora Decided to Invest in Zinser 351 Machine If Aurora decided to invest in new machine, at first they will need an initial investment of $8.25 million (from total capitalized cost), plus, Aurora have spent $ 5,000 on engineering test, $ 15,000 market research, and additional $50,000 for one time employee training. The effect on investing on Zinser, is that they will be reduction in conversion cost of Hunter plant, from $0.43/pound, to $0.40/pound, also the potential of reduced cotton inventories from 30 days to 20 days. At the same time, the price of the yarn will increase 10% from $ 1.0235 to $ 1.126, while other value doesn’t change from first choice (total annual production growth in sales and production). In all, the NPV of the Hunter Plant is about $ 14.42 million. Comparation Between Investing...
Words: 405 - Pages: 2
...RSM330 Assignment 2 – Group Work Due: March 20, 2015 in class & online Question 1: Fundamental Analysis (Total 20 Marks) a) i. These two companies are both in the Auto Parts and Equipment industry. ii. The auto industry sells discretionary goods, which consumers can afford to purchase more of in a booming economy. Therefore these companies stocks are cyclical since their price can be affected by ups and downs in the economy. b) |Magma |2012 |2013 |2014 | |Net Profit Margin |4.6% |4.5% |5.1% | |Asset Turnover |1.9x |2.0x |2.0x | |Leverage |1.81 |1.86 |2.09 | |ROE |(4.6%)(1.9x)(1.81) |(4.5%)(2.0x)(1.86) = 16.74% |(5.1%)(2.0x)(2.09) | | |= 15.8% | |= 21.3% | |Linamar |2012 |2013 |2014 | |Net Profit Margin |4.5% ...
Words: 2755 - Pages: 12
...barber shops and then selling them for a profit. Buffett began trading stocks at a young age with success. It was obvious Buffett knew what he was doing as an adolescent and I think this set the foundation’s for his strategies later in life. It also shows that he would not invest something he was not familiar with. Who is not familiar with gum, lemonade and pin ball as a kid?? Warren Buffett was first exposed to formal training in investing at Columbia University, where Buffett studied under Prof. Ben Graham. Graham developed a method that identified undervalued stocks and this was Buffett’s cornerstone approach of what is now called “valued investing”. From 1962 up through the 80’s Buffett really made his mark on the financial institutions across the US. In 1965 Buffett took a risk with Berkshire Hathaway, at first did not pan out but in 1967 with the purchase of stocks in two separate companies it showed how Buffett’s patience has paid off. In 1970 when he became CEO of Berkshire, this was the mark that changed investing for everyone in...
Words: 1277 - Pages: 6
... Who are the leading companies in the industry? Is the industry dominated by a few company or is there strong competition? How is your company positioned in the industry? Industry Trends that affect your company 4) Detailed Company Analysis – Include items such as sales, income, and margin trends. Capital Structure (% of Long-Term Debt as a percentage of total Capitalization) Discuss any new products or new business strategies being used by the company. Include sales growth rate. Is there anything on the horizon for this company that might cause the stock to go up or down? Ex. Catalysts. 5) Investment Risks– Discussion of negative factors to consider when investing in the company 6) Investment Merits – Discussion of positive factors to consider when investing in the company 7) Valuation – Provide the value per shares from your DCF model along with the major assumptions you made in the model (the WACC, risk-free rate, company beta, method for projecting sales, terminal growth rate, etc.) Also provide valuation based on...
Words: 325 - Pages: 2
...Growth Stocks vs. Value Stocks Thomas Anderton MBA 570 Professor Scott Growth stocks generally come from companies of high quality and who are considered successful. Investors expect the earnings of these companies to keep growing above the market average. If an investor were to analyze the companies with growth stock they would notice that these stocks have high price to earnings ratios and high price to book ratios. The price to earnings ratio shows the market price per share divided by the earnings. In order to have a high ratio generally the market price per share is high. Value stocks are the exact opposite of growth stock in terms of their price per earnings ratio and their price to book ratio, which means they generally have low ratios. These companies are generally expected by investors to increase in value when the rest of the market recognizes their potential. According to Bryan Rich of Forbes, “Value stocks are stocks with the lowest P/E, price to book, price to sales and price to cash flow. Other twists on value investing are simply looking at the lowest priced stocks in a major index or stocks with the highest dividend yield in a major index” (Rich, 2016). To some investors, growth stocks may seem to be expensive and at times overhauled, which could cause them to invest in value stocks. Investors may chase value stock because they don’t have as much money to invest as other investors who choose growth stocks. Some investors may choose to invest in growth...
Words: 743 - Pages: 3
...1 2. Investment versus Speculation: Results to Be Expected by the Intelligent Investor 58 65 COMMENTARY ON CHAPTER 3 4. A Century of Stock-Market History: The Level of Stock Prices in Early 1972 80 General Portfolio Policy: The Defensive Investor 88 COMMENTARY ON CHAPTER 4 5. 101 124 Portfolio Policy for the Enterprising Investor: Negative Approach 133 COMMENTARY ON CHAPTER 6 7. 112 COMMENTARY ON CHAPTER 5 6. The Defensive Investor and Common Stocks 145 iv 155 COMMENTARY ON CHAPTER 7 8. Portfolio Policy for the Enterprising Investor: The Positive Side 179 The Investor and Market Fluctuations 188 v Contents COMMENTARY ON CHAPTER 8 9. Investing in Investment Funds COMMENTARY ON CHAPTER 9 213 226 242 10. The Investor and His Advisers 257 COMMENTARY ON CHAPTER 10 272 11. Security Analysis for the Lay Investor: General Approach COMMENTARY ON CHAPTER 11 12. Things to Consider About Per-Share Earnings COMMENTARY ON CHAPTER 12 13. A Comparison of Four Listed Companies COMMENTARY ON CHAPTER 13 14. Stock Selection for the Defensive Investor COMMENTARY ON CHAPTER 14 15. Stock Selection for the Enterprising Investor COMMENTARY ON CHAPTER 15 16....
Words: 224262 - Pages: 898
...Design/methodology/approach – The RAPM is grounded in an economic setting where two groups of agents hold different beliefs about firm fundamental values, and the more sophisticated ¨ group (rationals) adopts contrarian strategies against the naıve group (quasis). The model is derived in a static equilibrium within the consumption-investment framework with heterogeneous agents. Findings – The key theoretical result is a parsimonious equation of cross-sectional expected returns that not only are specified by the traditional risk-return relation, but also are determined by contrarian adjustments at both market-wide and firm-specific levels. When the model is taken to empirical specifications, it leads to consistent explanations for the behaviors of growth and value stocks, and for size and book-to-market effects. Research limitations/implications – The RAPM is a one-period model that assumes that “rationals” have perfect knowledge about “quasis” sentiment parameter and their relative market weights. In future research, it is planned to extend this static model to multiple periods to incorporate a learning process by which...
Words: 7898 - Pages: 32
...Common sense dictates that a dollar today is worth more than a dollar in the future, as one could invest the dollar and earn interest on it. That statement has been implanted in the brains of all business students. Whether a person is a business professional or an investor, understanding the time value of money is critical when it pertains to financial decisions. In analyzing The Home Depot, Inc. as illustrated in Table 1, when discounting Home Depot’s free cash flows at 8% for fiscal years 2015 through 2018, the present values are $104.63MM, $95.16MM, $85.73MM, $74.24MM, and $66.02MM respectively and the total present value equals $425.78MM. Therefore, Home Depot’s $530MM total free cash flows is worth $425.78MM today. According to Michael...
Words: 447 - Pages: 2
...Goode-Middleton MBA 570 Growth Stock and Value Stocks March 21, 2015 Purchasing stock makes investors part owners in the corporation. The stock purchased is an equity investment in the company. This makes the owner of the stock entitled to returns on their investment. When making stock investment decisions, there are two main stock types to consider investing in called value stocks and growth stocks. The goal of both stock types is to gain the best returns possible. However, they differ in characteristics. Value stock is defined as, a stock that tends to trade at a lower price relative to its fundamentals and thus considered undervalued by a value investor. Common characteristics of such stock include a high dividend yield, low price-to-book ratio and/or low price to earnings ratio (Investopedia, 2015, para. 1). Value stock investors are looking for stocks that are not reflecting their fundamental worth. The reasons for the stock being undervalued can be many. A company’s stock can be undervalue because it is experiences difficulties, its industry can be in decline or it can have a period of poor quarterly earnings. These are a few of the reasons why the stock can be undervalued. In general, value funds focus on perceived safety rather than growth, often investing in mature companies that are primarily using their earnings to pay dividends. As a result, value funds tend to produce more current income than growth funds, although the also...
Words: 1065 - Pages: 5
