Free Essay

Gun Control

In: Science

Submitted By tscott225
Words 3064
Pages 13
Guns Magazine: Loaded... ready... safe! Can your home-defense gun be loaded and quickl... Page 1 of 5
Return to article page This story was printed from LookSmart's FindArticles where you can search and read 3.5 million articles from over 700 publications. http://www.findarticles.com

Loaded... ready... safe! Can your home-defense gun be loaded and quickly accessible, yet still be safe? Our handgun editor says "Yes!" and offers several proven strategies.
Guns Magazine , Jan 1, 2002, by Massad Ayoob If you keep a gun in your home or workplace, it's only common sense that it be loaded and quickly accessible. The same common sense, however, also tells us the firearm should be inaccessible to children, incompetent adults and unlawful intruders. Having both at once is a tall order, but that doesn't make it impossible. Let's look at a broad spectrum of armed citizens and police officers in this country who have found that when it comes to this important matter -- you can have your cake and eat it too. In The Home John is a detective and gunfight winner who works for a large, West Coast jaw-enforcement agency that serves a very high-crime community. He has investigated a number of violent home invasions, many of which had tragically fatal results. Though most of these were "drug dealer invading and ripping off rival dealer" situations, a disturbing number involved innocent, law-abiding citizens who were helpless once their doors were kicked in. When John gets dressed for work in the morning, he clips the department-issue Safariland holster containing a Glock 17 loaded with Winchester 9mm hollowpoints onto his belt. When he comes home at night, the gun and holster stay in place. "In virtually all the home invasions I've investigated, there wouldn't have been time for the victims to run into the next room and grab a loaded gun once the bad guys started kicking the door down, let alone time to get an unloaded firearm from one place and ammo from somewhere else and put it all together," says John. If friends or neighbors come by to visit in the evening, they are not surprised to see John sitting on the sofa in his shirtsleeves, the Glock at his hip as conspicuous as the ever-present cigar in his hand. Anyone welcome in that household knows John is a cop and that the pistol is a tool of his trade. A postman, UPS delivery person, or other stranger at the door on legitimate business stops worrying about the handgun as soon as they see the badge that John keeps attached to his belt in front of the holster. 3,000 miles away lives Frank, a retired big-city detective who spent most of his career in heavy action precincts. He's a veteran of multiple shootouts, including one that occurred off -duty while he was putting out the garbage. His two service weapons, both privately owned, were Smith & Wesson .38 Special revolvers: a four-inch barrel Model 10 six-shooter and a five-shot Model 36 Chief Special, both meticulously maintained. He never leaves the house without the Chief strapped to his ankle or placed in his pocket. He secures the full-size service revolver using a trick that is taught at his city's police academy. Frank's handcuffs aren't just souvenirs of 25 years of a tough job. One bracelet secures the Model 10 -- with the

http://www.findarticles.com/cf_0/m0BQY/1_48/80635890/print.jhtml

3/7/04

Guns Magazine: Loaded... ready... safe! Can your home-defense gun be loaded and quickl... Page 2 of 5 solid half of one bracelet between the rear of the trigger and the back portion of the trigger guard -- and the bridged-half locks over the hammer spur. Though the revolver is loaded with 158-grain Federal Nyclad +P hollowpoints, it cannot be fired. The hammer cannot rise, and the trigger cannot come far enough to the rear to allow a discharge. The other bracelet is secured to a firmly mounted horizontal hangar pole in his bedroom closet. For his entire career, on and off duty, Frank has carried a small keychain with keys to his house, his car and his handcuffs. That hasn't changed. The keys are always on his person. The one for the handcuffs is oversized to allow fast manipulation. Experience has taught him that he can quickly unlock the big Smith & Wesson and have it in hand and ready to go in the rare moment when the smaller five-shot S&W is not instantly accessible. My old friend Phil Engeldrum was among the first to promote this concept to law-abiding armed citizens, referring to the handcuffs in this application as "circular locks." Jeff is a distinguished octogenarian who killed three more heavily armed enemy personnel with his handgun while honorably serving his country in time of war. In his younger days, he won numerous combat pistol awards and did much to advance the state of combat pistol doctrine. Only semi-retired even now, he is acutely aware that he is slowed down by old injuries from a physically strenuous and high-risk life. He doesn't worry about access to defensive handguns to protect himself and his lovely wife, however. A home defense system he developed decades before keeps the means readily at hand. When Jeff puts on his pants in the morning, he puts on a customized 1911 .45 auto, cocked-and -locked, on his right hip, with a spare magazine on the opposite side. Even on the bad days when he needs a wheelchair, the .45 is instantly at hand. Not far away is a lupara, a short double-barrel shotgun, kept in a broken open condition. On its stock is tied a leather shell loop carrier filled with buckshot and slugs. It's the ideal tool, Jeff feels, to "repel boarders." Jim is a retired sheriff in Texas and a certified gun expert. In his front trouser pocket a Smith & Wesson Model 640 "hammer-less" .38 Special snub will be found, as surely as his wallet will be found in his hip pocket. In addition, there's generally a fancy cocked-and -locked Colt .45 automatic in his waistband, sometimes replaced by a Smith & Wesson .357 Combat Magnum or even a single-action Colt or Ruger sixgun. A lifetime in a dangerous profession taught Jim to always be armed, even at home. His wife -- a police officer back in the days when most cops were allowed only revolvers -- doesn't carry all the time, especially at home. However, since their children are grown and gone, Jim and his wife are comfortable keeping a K-frame Smith & Wesson revolver in a drawer or on a high shelf in every room in the house. Each is fully loaded with 158-grain +P all-lead hollowpoints, backed up by an HKS speedloader filled with the same ammo next to each gun. This assures Jim that even when he's away hunting or at a seminar, his wife will be able to reach a gun and effectively defend herself at any moment. When grandchildren come to visit, a household rule is that Jim and his spouse will be notified sufficiently in advance to make a quick sweep of the house and secure the loaded revolvers. Ricky is a gunsmith and ex-cop. Each morning he slides a factory-tuned Colt Government Model .45 auto into an Ayoob Rear Guard holster by Mitch Rosen. The pistol, like the Federal Classic 185-grain JHP ammo he loads it with, was issued by his police department. He bought the gun when he retired. He and his lovely wife live in a remote backwoods home. And whether the problem is a human predator or one of the bears often seen on the property, he knows that he won't have time to run from the field to the house to access a gun if there's trouble. Ricky also keeps handy a Smith & Wesson Model 65 .357 Magnum revolver. It has been fitted with a

http://www.findarticles.com/cf_0/m0BQY/1_48/80635890/print.jhtml

3/7/04

Guns Magazine: Loaded... ready... safe! Can your home-defense gun be loaded and quickl... Page 3 of 5
MagnaTrigger, the one "smart gun" concept that not only actually exists but has actually been proven to work. He and his bride each have the special magnetic rings which are worn on the middle finger to activate the gun. When either of them grasps that Military & Police .357, the ring activates the system, allowing the revolver to fire with a normal grasp as quickly as the trigger can be pulled. An unauthorized hand, however, can only pull the trigger far enough to the rear to allow the cylinder to rotate. I used a Magna Trigger .357 Combat Magnum as my "nightstand gun" when my children were little. Neither they nor a burglar had the wherewithal to make the revolver discharge, but my wife and I slipped a ring on the middle finger of each hand before going to bed (in case weak-hand-only firing was necessary). Each of us had immediate access to a gun that would only fire at our command. This old Model 66 has been in semi-retirement for some years, but with the recent marriage of our oldest daughter; we know that grandchildren, can't be too far in the future. Thus, we expect that the gun we called "Fluffy, the pet revolver" (because it would only "speak" for its owners) may soon come out of retirement. Points To Note You have noted that each of the above-named professionals keeps his gun on at all times. This is because each has learned a basic truth: Only by wearing the loaded gun on your person at all times can it be instantly accessible while simultaneously secured from unauthorized hands. Note also that many of the above have a fallback system of accessible weaponry. And each has ensured that every member of the household with the requisite competency level has a firearm of some sort readily accessible. In The Workplace Strangers are seldom allowed to enter your home at will. Your workplace -- particularly if it is a place of business open to the public -- has people of unknown competence and responsibility going in and out all the time. This can make securing a deadly weapon a much more daunting task. Jack was a lawyer in the South. The secretaries at the firm thought he was like the star of the old TV show Father Knows Best because he never removed his suit coat or blazer in the office. Actually, fastidiousness in the name of men's fashion had little to do with it. The jacket was there to cover his custom Colt .45 automatic in its Milt Sparks inside-the-waistband holster. As the managing partner of the firm, Jack seldom had to go to court. As a result, he could almost always keep the gun on, so long as it was concealed to keep from alarming clients. There were two occasions when he needed that gun, both times shortly after returning home from work. On one occasion, a vicious dog attacked him and a Glaser Safety Slug to the beast's throat at muzzle contact saved him from crippling injury. In a later incident, he was just leaving his house when a home invader entered his carport armed with a MAC-10 submachine gun. Jack drew his Government Model and delivered a hail of accurate rapid fire, winning the deadly contest. He is now retired and can always be found with a gun on his person. Dee is the CEO of a conglomerate in the Northeast. The semi-relaxed dress code in the office does not leave her any good options for carrying a concealed handgun. Her solution is a lock box, the Gun Vault. It uses a fast-access, battery -operated, push-button release with a key-lock backup. It contains an

http://www.findarticles.com/cf_0/m0BQY/1_48/80635890/print.jhtml

3/7/04

Guns Magazine: Loaded... ready... safe! Can your home-defense gun be loaded and quickl... Page 4 of 5 engraved Colt Detective Special .38 with which she is fast and deadly accurate. Because concealment is not a concern, she has fitted the revolver with hand -filling Pachmayr Compac grips, which give her maximum control for fast, accurate combat shooting. Sandra is a West Coast attorney who survived a tragic multiple murder in which the disgruntled loser of a lawsuit burst into her law office shooting. People were killed before the berserker committed suicide. She remembers the helpless terror she felt as she huddled under a desk, listening to the gunfire and the screams of her colleagues. Some other survivors of the massacre became crusaders for gun control. Sandra took a logical approach. Ever since the event, there has been a loaded handgun in the top drawer of her desk. The gun itself is sometimes a .357 Magnum S&W revolver, sometimes a 9mm HK auto pistol. She keeps the drawer in an unlocked condition, the key in place with the keychain hanging from it on a Kubotan self defense stick. When she has to leave the room, she has made it an unfailing ritual to lock the drawer of the heavyduty steel desk and slip the Kubotan keychain into the waistband of her pantsuit. When she goes to court, the courthouse security guards obligingly hold the Kubotan for her in a secure place until she leaves the building. It's a system that works for this violence survivor who has sworn to herself, "never again." Another survivor of a workplace massacre is Joel, a high school principal in Mississippi. He was vice principal of another school on the morning when gunfire broke out in the part of the school called The Commons. A 16-year-old monster had stabbed his mother to death that morning to gain access to her estranged husband's .30-30 hunting rifle, and now the boy was using it to kill and maim his schoolmates. The school was a "gun-free environment," but under Mississippi law it was legal for Joel to have a gun in his locked car in the parking lot. He sprinted to his pickup truck, unlocked the door, and tore his Colt Officer's ACP from its carrying case. Moments later, he interdicted the young mass murderer and forced him to surrender at gunpoint. Though school policy had not allowed him the means to stop the horror immediately, Joel's courageous action and ability to reach a .45-caliber pistol had prevented more killing. At the time of his capture by this brave armed citizen, the youthful murderer was heading for the nearby middle school with the rifle and another 36 rounds of ammunition to continue the carnage. Joel told me later, "There is no doubt in my mind that if I could have reached a gun without having to run to the parking lot, I could have stopped things much sooner." Phil is a streetwise businessman who used to run a gunsmithing accessory shop open to the public in California. He didn't like the idea of loaded guns lying around behind the counters where an employee's child or some other unauthorized person might reach them. His solution: a bevy of Browning 9mm pistols stored in strategic spots behind the counters. The guns were stowed cockedand -locked, with a live JHP round in the chamber, but with no magazine in place. The magazine disconnector safety incorporated into the Hi-Power design prevented the chambered round from being fired. Each authorized employee was required to carry a loaded Browning magazine in a pocket or an inconspicuous belt pouch. With a quick, practiced movement, the employees could snatch up a Browning with their dominant hand and snap in a full magazine with the other hand, instantly having a loaded pistol in hand and ready to fire.

http://www.findarticles.com/cf_0/m0BQY/1_48/80635890/print.jhtml

3/7/04

Guns Magazine: Loaded... ready... safe! Can your home-defense gun be loaded and quickl... Page 5 of 5
My father, a gunfight survivor himself, owned a jewelry store in the Northeast. Dad was a Colt man, and whether he was greeting a customer behind the counter or fixing a watch or ring at his bench, a loaded 4-inch police service revolver was always within reach in a holster nailed to the counter or bench, unseen by customers. In the back room, inaccessible to customers, a cocked-and -locked Colt auto -pistol reposed in a holster nailed to a shelf in a similar fashion, and a Winchester pump gun loaded with 12-gauge Super-X buckshot was readily at hand. Yet another holster was attached to the ceiling of the safe. Here, if forced to open the waist-high vault at gunpoint, store personnel could grab the Colt Cobra .38. When he put the day's receipts and the diamonds from the showcases into the safe at night, Dad would slip that hammer-shrouded snubnose from its holster quickly (one practice repetition per day) and then put it into his pocket for the drive home. The next morning, as he opened the safe, he would retu rn the gun to its resting place. Points to Note A "no guns" workplace code can leave those in the workplace vulnerable to assault and mass murder. Guns that are authorized must be stored, like home-defense guns, in a manner that makes them instantly accessible to authorized and competent personnel yet simultaneously inaccessible to those who are not authorized. Loaded, ready, yet safe? Yes, it can be done, as the true examples above clearly show. RELATED ARTICLE Here's how handcuffs may be used to secure conventional double-action handguns. S&W Model 686 revolver has bracelet locking both hammer and trigger in place. The Ruger P90 .45 auto is similarly secured. External appearance fails to reveal that this S&W Model 66 .357 Combat Magnum has been altered to "smart gun" status by installing the MagnaTrigger device. Mossberg's newly-announced LocBox is the answer for keeping a shotgun loaded but safe from unauthorized use or theft. COPYRIGHT 2002 Publishers' Development Corporation in association with The Gale Group and LookSmart. COPYRIGHT 2001 Gale Group

http://www.findarticles.com/cf_0/m0BQY/1_48/80635890/print.jhtml

3/7/04

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Gun Control

...Adan Gallardo Should the government pass stricter gun laws? Did you know that only in 2011 there were 11,101 people killed by an irresponsible gun owner? Yes, the irresponsibility of gun owner have caused an immense impact in society, based in The International Firearm Injury Prevention and Policy Organization, just since January of 2013 there has been 8,534 cases of people killed by a gun. In fact, to prevent more deaths due to irresponsible gun owners the government of the USA should certainly pass stricter gun laws because it can prevent deaths, it can reduce crimes, and it can make America a better and a safer place to live. There are many reasons for the government to pass stricter gun laws. A perfect example is the shooting that took place in a movie theater in Aurora, Colorado. James Egan Holmes killed twelve innocent people and at least 59 were injured with an AR-15 assault rifle, a shotgun, and a 40- caliber hand gun. These kinds of incidents could be prevented if the government would pass much harsh and stricter gun laws, so that not anyone could obtain a gun so easy. Throughout the country many people are afraid, because of how easy it is for someone to obtain a firearm. These people have all the right to be insecure, but parents are the ones who are most perturbed, and this is due to the school shooting in Connecticut. Adam Lanza killed himself after killing 20 small children and six adults in an elementary school with two 9mm pistols, police officers...

Words: 553 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Gun Control

...Gun control has been a debated issue especially after the events that have transpired in the past year in our nation. Many believe that if there are stricter regulations for guns that violence will be reduced traumatically. The constitution states "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." This gives the American the right to own a weapon. Of course this was written in the beginning of our country and times have changed. These days you cannot use it for unlawful use. Not saying that people will not use them unlawfully because it has happened in the past year and many are now trying to eradicate guns on a national scale. If our beloved country decided to remove the right to bear arms, the effect would be, if anything, negative. The people who want guns for illegal purposes would discover ways to get them, while the rest of us would have no way to protect ourselves against them. Our country should continue to have the right to bear arms. I believe that stronger restrictions should be made. I believe that every state should regulate the gun laws in their prospective state but on a federal level restrict what type of weapons should be allowed for sale. For example on the federal level the laws would regulate that assault rifles would only be used by our military and law enforcement. I used assault Rifles as an example because we are not in a state where we have militias like...

Words: 582 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Gun Control

...Argumentative Essay against Gun Control Argumentative Essay against Gun Control Since 1980, forty-four states have passed laws allowing gun owners to carry concealed weapons outside their homes for personal protection. (Five additional states had these laws before 1980. Illinois is the sole holdout.) A federal ban on the possession, transfer, or manufacture of semiautomatic assault weapons, passed in 1994, was allowed to expire in 2004. In 2005, Florida passed the Stand Your Ground law, an extension of the so-called castle doctrine, exonerating from prosecution citizens who use deadly force when confronted by an assailant, even if they could have retreated safely; Stand Your Ground laws expand that protection outside the home to any place that an individual “has a right to be.” Twenty-four states have passed similar laws. Guns, therefore, are necessary in today's society for our protection There is no point to implement gun control considering the reality that criminals will still find a way to procure guns if they want to do so. Criminals will always make sure to have access to the guns that they need to execute their crimes successfully. They usually have connections to other influential people that can provide them with the guns and weapons that they need in order to execute their crimes. The bottom line is that if the criminals want to have access to guns, they will be able to get them even if there is a gun control policy in place. This law will not stop...

Words: 797 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Gun Control

...Gun Control Paper Gun Control has been an issue that has been brought to the public’s eyes in recent years. This main issue has been going on for many years, for example when John F. Kennedy was assassinated; it raised public awareness to the lack of control on sales and also possession of guns in America. Until 1968 guns were available over the counter in stores and through mail catalogs to just about any adult in America. This was an example of how loosely guns were regulated which bring us back to the issue of guns. The constitution tells us in the second amendment that we, as American Citizens, have the right to bear arms. But the government is trying to change that by regulating everything to do with owning a gun. My stance: Gun control is just another way for the government to get into our personal lives. Gun violence is a common thing in America and it needs to be stopped some say. For example, Susan Milligan says this, “Opponents of any kind of gun restrictions argue that they are meaningless, since criminals by definition don't follow the law, and therefore won't allow gun laws to hamstring their criminal behavior. That's true. But gun violence isn't only committed by classic criminals, as recent gun-related tragedies show.” Now she argues that all of gun violence, well the majority, is because of criminals which bring us to background checks. When a person buys a firearm they go through a process of steps to make sure that they are capable of buying a firearm...

Words: 766 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Gun Control

...Gun control The U.S. should not have gun control laws. The Second Amendment to the Constitution states that, “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” This amendment has been around since 1791, and there has been gun control almost as long as it's been around. The National Rifle Association is an advocate of the Second Amendment and an opponent of those who propose restrictions on guns. Even Presidents Reagan and Bush are members, and Nixon, Eisenhower, and Kennedy were also members. Why do people feel the need to own a handgun? One reason is heritage. For as long as this country has been around, there have been gun owners, to defend themselves and to hunt for food. Buying, owning, or carrying a handgun doesn't hurt anyone. Until a person commits a crime, he/she is free to choose what he/she wants to do. Even if guns were completely banned from the U.S.A., people would still find a way to get them. Criminals would get guns. They would have their way, and there would be nothing we could do about it. We would have no way to defend ourselves. What is gun control to you? To me, it is the unconstitutional regulation and banning of guns to try to keep the crime ...

Words: 394 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Gun Control

...“Gun control” is a phrase that means different things to different people. It has been a serious topic of debate that this author now intends to prove as being right or wrong. There is no in-between on this issue. Both sides have received adequate attention and will be treated in an objective manner. For all the attention that gun control has received, there are two basic opinions that are to be discussed. To its proponents, gun control means prevention of crime. This, they say, should lead to peace. Charles Krauthammer wrote about this in “The Washington Post” in an article titled “Disarm The People.” He wrote, “…a civilized society must disarm its citizenry if it is to have a modicum of domestic tranquility…” Pro-gun activists, on the other hand, see gun-control as a threat not only to their self-defense, but also to their Second Amendment right. In an issue of American Survival Guide, Howard J. Fezell wrote an essay: “Your Individual Right to Keep and Bear Arms,” during which he made plain this fact: gun-prohibitionists have completely ignored numerous rulings of the Supreme Court in which the Supreme Court has stated the Second Amendment as an individual right, not a collective right. Also, they believe it to be a failed experiment. This is obvious in a statement by David Lampo: “The basic premise of the gun control movement, that easy access to guns causes higher crime, is contradicted by the facts, by history and by reason.” According to statistics, gun bans - the...

Words: 998 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Gun Control

...Gun Control Jose Moreno HUM/114 February 2, 2012 David Radcliff In today’s society the issues regarding gun control have been controversial. Many strict laws have been passed by the federal government to regulate ownership of guns. In an attempt to regulate gun control many people believe that past familiar high profile political shootings have been as a result of the impactful gun control restrictions. In 2008 there was a battle taking place in The Supreme Court that voted five to four in favor of the American people’s constitutional right to keep a loaded handgun at home for self defense. The ruling has made anti gun supporters disagree and angry. Weapons are tools used for a variety of reasons weather it’s for safe guarding material that is highly pilfer able or protection of a family home. Guns are tools that should be treated and handled with respect and should not be abused or misused by any means. It is a privilege as well as a right that a person may own a weapon if he or she should decide to do so. I support the right to own and bear fire arms. I understand that if weapons get into the wrong hands tragedy’s can be as a result. I also agree that crime is low in areas that support the right to carry weapons. Carrying guns may often time deter crime from happening. It is important to educate oneself on the issue of gun control so that the person can make a quality decision on whether or not it is to their benefit to own a weapon. I understand that crime will never...

Words: 319 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Gun Control

...Topic: Gun Control Purpose: Stricter Laws on Gun control Specific purpose: Gun Control Controversy Thesis: Most gun owners are responsible and law-abiding, and they use their guns safely. The President strongly believes that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to bear arms. But to better protect our children and our communities from tragic mass shootings like those in Newtown, Aurora, Oak Creek, and Tucson, there are four common-sense steps we can take right now based of the President’s Plan for Gun control. Introduction: I. While no law or set of laws will end gun violence, it is clear that the American people want action. If even one child’s life can be saved, then we need to act. Now is the time to do the right thing for our children, our communities, and the country we love. II. Congress must also do its part. To prevent mass shootings and other gun violence, Congress should take critical steps through new legislation, including: requiring Background checks for all gun sales; reinstating the prohibition on high-capacity Magazines; renewing and strengthening the ban on assault weapons; and creating Serious penalties for gun traffickers who help put guns into the hands of criminals. III. These actions will: help make sure information about potentially dangerous people who are barred from having guns is available to the national background check system; lift the ban on research into the causes...

Words: 720 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Gun Control

...Michelle Evans History of Gun Control July 9, 2011 Chapter IV History of Gun Control In the 1960s after the assassinations of President John F. Kennedy, Dr. Martin Luther King, and Senator Robert F. Kennedy, gun control became a major subject of public passion and controversy. To some people gun control is a crime issue, to others it is a rights issue. Gun control is a safety issue, an education issue, a racial issue, and a political issue, among others. Within each of these issues there are those who want more gun control legislation and those who want less. On both sides of this issue opinions range from moderate to extreme. Guns are not for everyone. Certain individuals cannot handle a firearm safely, and some individuals choose to use firearms inappropriately. Our society has passed laws regulating the ownership and use of firearms, and more legislation is being considered. Most of this legislation restricts, to some degree, the rights of individuals to possess or use firearms. Some restrictions may be necessary, but some recent legislation has gone too far. Society benefits from firearms in the hands of responsible citizens. Attempts to keep firearms away from these citizens do more harm than good. The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution states: “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” The Founding Fathers included this in our bill of Rights because...

Words: 2226 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Gun Control

...Gun Control Columbine, Virginia Tech, Aurora and most recently Newtown; these places will forever be known as sites of enormous tragedy. The flames of adults and children were put out, and innocent lives were taken. All some could do was hold back their tears and ask why! Rage began to consume some while they watched the families of the victims break down and become overcome by sorrow. They began to look for someone or something to enact justice upon. The blame quickly went to weapons, guns to be specific. According to many lawmakers, senators and associations, gun debate rages on to this very day.  Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) said, “Until we have such reason to believe that we’d have a different outcome I think the issue is resolved by the Senate”. While some may have some strong feelings otherwise, I believe that completely abolishing guns will not solve our problems. Taking away guns from law abiding citizens will only endanger them more. I believe it is nearly impossible to eliminate guns. Although I am against eliminating our right to bear arms, I do believe that there should be more strict guidelines and procedures for us to be able to own weapons; more comprehensive background checks, mental evaluations and less availability. Imagine this, you are a law abiding citizen and the government just ruled that you may no longer own a weapon. You turn in your gun and two days later, a criminal breaks into your home, armed, and begins to assault you and your family. If only...

Words: 804 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Gun Control

...that they should have the protection that American citizens do. Citizens and immigrants alike do have the right to feel safe where they live. One major ban that helped in reducing the number of gun related fatalities was the Assault Weapons Ban of 1994. Since the ban has expired, more than 350 people have been killed and 450 people have been injured by military style weapons (Feinstein, 2013). The 1994 and the 2013 Assault Weapons Ban bans all rifles like AK-47’s and all shot guns like the IZHMASH Saga 12 types (Feinstein, 2013). What brought the gun debate to the tables of many families were the atrocious events that took place due to gun violence. The inhumane shootings in an elementary school in Connecticut and the movie theater shooting in Colorado have put the issue of gun control in the spotlight. These horrific events have spurned up the debate on how the government should go about decreasing the many innocent lives lost each year due to gun violence. Looking through the eyes of Dianne Feinstein, who is the Senator of the state of California, the ban of selling military style assault weapons and high captivity ammunition magazines is the solution to this problem (Feinstein, 2013).. This bill does not include anyone who already lawfully possessed a gun at the time of the bill being passed. The movie theater shooting in Aurora, Colorado was the main topic...

Words: 955 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Gun Control

...Gun Control: The Big Picture George Washington's picture Submitted by George Washington on 12/17/2012 12:36 -0500 Preface: I was raised to be against guns. My parents hated guns, and believed that they only lead to crime and to accidental shootings. Raised in a blue state, I had the stereotype that militias were made of crazies … and so the “right to bear arms” as part of a “well-regulated militia” seemed like a nutty anachronism. And I have long been deeply influenced by leading voices for non-violence, such as Gandhi and King. So – Until recently – I was pro gun-control. As such, I understand that gun control arguments very well. Gandhi and the Dalai Lama Were AGAINST Gun Control I was surprised to learn that two of the best-known promoters of nonviolence in history were not opposed to guns. Indeed, Mahatma Gandhi taught that we must first be brave enough to use guns to defend ourselves, and only then can we be qualified to use non-violent methods. For example, Gandhi wrote in his book, An Autobiography (page 446): Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the Act depriving a whole nation of arms, as the blackest … if we want to learn the use of arms, here is a golden opportunity. As Gandhi wrote in Doctrine of the Sword: I do believe that where there is only a choice between cowardice and violence I would advise violence. *** When my eldest son asked me what he should have done...

Words: 2024 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Gun Control

...Freedom vs. Control The statement ‘The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed’ from the U.S constitution seems like a pretty solid sentence. There is really no way to misinterpret it. Our country gained its freedom with guns, kept its freedom with guns, and guns will play a vital role in keeping our freedom. The banning of firearms in America is an illegal act, and degrades the values this country has been founded on. Guns not only play a vital role in many people's lives, but are useful tools, fun to use, and can protect people from harm. Our founding fathers wanted us to have guns to protect ourselves and would be disgusted at our government's current abuse, and overall disregard of the constitution of the United States. Many people argue that guns kill people; this is untrue. Guns in the hands of a negligent person have potential to kill people, just as anything else. Guns do not kill people, people kill people; and for this reason alone banning guns would endanger society. Someone with the intent to do someone else harm will find a way, with or without a gun. The right to bear arms gives society a fighting chance to fight for themselves if a harmful situation should arise. Becoming solely dependent upon the Government to protect society is an unrealistic fantasy. This fantasy sounds nice; having a non-violent society is the ultimate goal, but will not be met by banning guns. Banning guns will give criminals more chances to inflict harm on...

Words: 279 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Gun Control

...Gun Control Weapons have been with us for a very long time. Longer than anyone can remember. It has become part of our constitution and a legal matter. It is made legal by the constitution and many other laws passed that require many steps to obtain a firearm. Although it is stated to be legal many people oppose the issue and I am one of them. Tens of thousands of people are killed every year by illegal guns thrown on the streets. There is never any gain from guns because someone always ends up dying for the right and wrong reasons. There are many ways to punish someone without the use of guns. Almost every day we hear a story in the paper or on the news about a fatality involving guns. One day it’s a little boy that shot himself or his cousin while playing with his father’s gun. Another day it’s a drive by shooting that killed a mother and her little kid. If guns were illegal then many people would still be alive. The United States of America has the highest gun death in the world, and its leading the other ranking countries by a very wide gap. If guns were illegal in the United States, and strict rules were enforced against those who are caught with a gun many people would fear the consequences and think twice about committing a crime with a gun. At that point criminals would face a much tougher decision whether to commit a crime or not. Many people make the argument that guns are for safety purposes and they should be kept in every house, but as statistics show...

Words: 445 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Gun Control

...a problem with guns. Like every other good old boy, I am concerned about being the victim of a random shooting, but at the same time, I want to be able to take down a nice10-point buck during hunting season. Guns effect every one of us every day. They fill us with fear or they make us feel protected. My point is this: guns are a problem, but using gun control to abolish them isn't necessarily the best solution. In gun control I mean laws that keep firearms off the street by preventing their purchase. I agree that some form of gun control is needed, but what we really need to concentrate on is gun licensing and more gun safety. I believe in my constitutional right to keep and bear arms, and I don't feel that legislators should be allowed to take away that right. Gun control can be a good thing, but if it leads to gun prohibition I will fight it until the day I die.   Our country was founded on the basis of guns. The wars were won with guns and the people were protected by guns. Guns were so important that they were placed in the Bill of Rights of the United States Constitution:   A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Amendment II   From this amendment it is apparent that the founders of our country knew in 1791 that guns did and would continue to play a role in the lives of Americans. Things haven't really changed that much.   Gun control was brought into...

Words: 1497 - Pages: 6