Free Essay

Hell Debate

In:

Submitted By tmoore37
Words 2153
Pages 9
Liberty University

Hell Debate: The Classical view and The Annihilationist view of Hell

RLGN 335 B08
Professor: Wesley Handy

By
Tami L Moore

October 16, 2015

Jesus, suggest that hell is “outer darkness “beyond heaven because heaven is light “where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.” He teaches that many will seek to enter heaven but be shut out (Luke 13:22-30), suggesting that there is no way to escape from hell once there. Throughout life, we have heard plenty of talk about Heaven and Hell. Heaven was for the people that believe in doing well unto God as Christian and lived their lives accordingly to God's Commandments. . And Hell was always known as the place where the devil reside and the place that sinners and evil people that resisted God and refuse to accept God into their hearts and lived in sin, and last judgement is served. Heaven and Hell was spoken of in church, but most Pastor spoke on hell lesser than they did heaven. Sinclair Ferguson expresses how the doctrine of hell should influence one’s preaching. “He says preachers should stress God’s righteousness, the sinfulness of sin, and God’s justice in condemning sin. He adds that expositors should affirm that hell is real, that hell is vividly described in the New Testament, and that hell, though prepared for the devil and his angels, is shared by human beings” (Morgan and Peterson). Many Pastors thought it was easier to reach the people if they talk more on Heaven and God's blessing than Hell and the sin and evil of the devil. But the irony of it all was that God could control who went to heaven and who went to hell, but Satan could only control who went to hell. If God is the creation of all and everything He made was good and very good, why was hell even created? Why would a loving, compassionate, and peaceful God allow a place like this to exist? So the debated questioned still exist today why did God make a hell? Many believe that hell is a place that God prepare for Satan and his fallen angels. Hopefully by the end of my research paper we all will have a greater understanding of the nature of hell. Charlie Tinsley stated, “The nature of hell is one that both terrifies and challenges a believer’s concept of God".(Tinsley)

Two evangelical theologians state this about hell. "Robert Peterson beliefs are those of a traditional view being those who do not have faith in Christ will suffer eternally in hell. Author Edward Fudge belief is of a conditionals’ perspective, believing that after a period of suffering, the unfaithful will experience a complete extinguishing, or annihilation, of existence"(Fudge and Patterson). Annihilationism is a Christian belief that apart from salvation the final punishment of human beings results in their total destruction rather than their everlasting torment, they normally assume that once God annihilates a person, they will never again come into existence; annihilation is a permanent state. This view is directly related to the doctrine of conditional immortality, the idea that a human soul is not immortal unless it is given eternal life. Annihilationism asserts that God will eventually destroy the wicked, leaving only the righteous to live on in immortality, this directly related to the doctrine of conditional immortality: "Meaning that a human soul is not immortal unless it is given eternal life and eternal security. They also assert the God will in the end destroy the evil ones, leaving only the righteous to live forever. Is God to merciful to punish sinners eternally? Is an endless hell unjust or unloving of God? Annihilationism believe scriptures describe God's love as a consuming fire, but sinful beings cannot exist in God's presence, good and evil won't dwell in the same space. So when one free willingly rejects salvation have become eternally destroyed because sin kept them from obtaining what was rightfully theirs. Annihilationist view believe hell is real but not eternal and the wicked are not destroy in this place, but cease to exist at death, or "that those if sent to hell will eventually cease to exist also"(Morgan and Peterson). Robert Peterson in his book "The Darkside of Eternity" stated, "Evangelical Annihilationist’s teach the return of Christ, the resurrection of the dead, and the last judgment with conscious punishment according to sins committed. The last stroke for the wicked is the extinction of their being. This extinction is irreversible; thus annihilationists define eternal punishment as extermination without remedy"(Peterson). Within the annihilationist view there are two modified views: The first is conditional immortality – The wicked are resurrected, but they forfeit eternal life and are simply allowed to pass out of existence. Second view annihilationist proper – God will punish sin, but in time that punishment results in the cessation of life"(Branam Brian). "Annihilationist views are ultimately that life ends after death, so there is no need for hell. To the annihilationist, the existence of a soul that rejects God prohibits His victory over sin as the souls would still continue existing in an eternal hell meaning God cannot save all people and victory over sin means annihilation of the lost’s soul.(Boyd and Eddy)

Eternal conscious punishment is the view that the wicked will suffer the pains of hell forever. It is also called traditionalism because it is the church’s traditional view. Annihilationism, by contrast, is the view that God will exterminate the wicked in hell. Conditional immortality—conditionalism for short—is the view that God does not give immortality to all human beings, but only to believers, and that He will resurrect unbelievers, who lack the gift of immortality, to face ultimate annihilation”( Peterson)
The authors of "Across the Spectrum" Eddy and Boyd states" the Classical view believes the lost souls are going to cast into hell where they will encounter constant and eternal suffering and torment from Satan, this is the traditional view of the church. The classical view is that hell is an eternal of unending turmoil for the wicked, also they believe that if a sinner rejects salvation free willingly and chose not to turn from their evil and wickedness then hell will be there final stop after the die, and their should will forever be tormented they will never rest again. Every lasting life goes the Christians and everlasting shame goes to the lost souls in hell. The eternal nature of God’s glory is at odds with the eternal nature of sin and He will punish it eternally. Second, God does not send people to hell, people choose their eternal destination by their actions and rejection of God (John 3:19). Free will is a double edged sword and the choices one makes in this life directly impact the judgment they incur upon death. Third, the charges of cruelty here are misguided if one recognizes the images used to describe hell in scripture are not literal These images do portray the eternal life without God, but are figurative in nature when we look at passages such as Matthew 22:13 when it describes hell as a place of darkness and Matthew 18:8 when it describes hell as a place of perpetual fire. Hell is the absence of God for all eternity, there is no greater torment on the human soul than the removal of God’s mercy and grace as sin consumes them entirely"(Eddy and Boyd). The best argument for annihilationism” derives from the traditional theistic doctrine of divine conservation: all things depend on God to conserve their existence from moment to moment, and so exist only so long as they are connected to God in some way. But if hell is complete and utter separation or disconnection from God, then hell would be a state of non-existence. Against annihilationism, some would object that it is contrary to God’s creative nature to annihilate anything” (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
"For behold, the day comes burning like an oven, when all the arrogant and all evildoers will be stubble; the day that comes shall burn them up, says the Lord of hosts, so that it will leave them neither root nor branch" (Mal 4:1)(NKJV)
"Hell is the absence of God for all eternity, there is no greater torment on the human soul than the removal of God’s mercy and grace as sin consumes them entirely"(Boyd and Eddy). Hell was created by God, it plainly states in the Bible, "For by Him all things were created, things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities. God from the beginning did not have hell in mind to be made. When Satan was cast out of heaven, God had to create a place for him and his fallen angels. God created the heavens and earth in the beginning and there was no mentioned of hell then, but He made hell for Satan, because of his betrayal, and he didn't want Satan to dwell on earth. Hell had no purpose in the beginning, God meant for us to have life and have it more abundantly. Before sin Adam and eve lived in the land of milk and honey in the Garden of Eden. After Satan had fallen God already knew that many will fall to his evil and sinful ways of deception, just as Eve did in the Garden that day. The nature of hell is to house Satan so that heaven and earth didn't have to be tainted by him and his fallen angels. David Hilborn the author of " The Nature of Hell states, “Mankind is created immortal, it fulfills its destiny in salvation while the lost fall into nonexistence by a direct action of God or the destructive effect of evil"( Hilborn). Bertrand Russell (1872-1970), a British philosopher and social reformer, “faulted Christ for allegedly teaching the doctrine of hellfire and for the untold cruelty such a doctrine has caused in Christian history. Russell wrote: "There is one serious defect to my mind in Christ’s moral character, and that is that He believed in hell. I do not myself feel that any person who is really profoundly humane can believe in everlasting punishment. Christ certainly as depicted in the Gospels did believe in everlasting punishment, and one does find repeatedly a vindictive fury against those people who would not listen to His preaching–an attitude which is common with preachers, but which does somewhat detract from superlative excellence. . . . I really do not think that a person with a proper degree of kindliness in his nature would have put fears and terrors of that sort into the world. . . . I must say that I think all this doctrine, that hellfire is a punishment for sin, is a doctrine of cruelty. It is a doctrine that put cruelty into the world and gave the world generations of cruel torture; and the Christ of the Gospels, if you take Him as His chroniclers represent Him, would certainly have to be considered partly responsible for that"( Bacchiocchi)

Russell’s protest is “Christ is partly the blame for the doctrine of everlasting punishment which brought about the world having generation of cruel torture, and this he explains cannot be let lightly as the fruit of a holy mindset. He states if Christ really describe that the save will enjoy eternal festivities while the unsaved will go to hell and suffer eternal torment in hell’s fire, we would then have to questioned the His character, because these actions don’t reflect Godliness. It is hard to imagine that the God whom Jesus Christ revealed as the merciful "Abba–Father" would bring forth vengeance on His disobedient children by torturing them for all eternity” (Bacchiocchi) . Christopher Morgan said it best in Hell Under Fire, ”Of all the teachings of Christianity, the doctrine of hell is easily the most troubling, so much so that in recent years the church has been quietly tucking it away. Rarely mentioned anymore in the pulpit, it has faded through disuse among evangelicals and been attacked by liberal theologians. Hell is no longer only the target of those outside the church. Today, a disturbing number of professing Christians question it as well”(Morgan) Word count: 2,144

Sources:
Morgan Christopher W., “Hell under Fire: Modern Scholarship Reinvent Eternal Punishment."
Fudge Edward William and Patterson Robert A. , "Two Views of Hell"
Thomas Pamela, "Hell is "
McCraw Benjamin, "The Concept of Hell"
Baxter Mary, "A Divine Revelation of Hell"
Peterson Robert A., "The Darkside of Eternity: Hell as Eternal Conscious Punishment" Article ID JAF1304
Bacchiocchi,Samuel, "Immortality of Resurection. Chp VI " Hell : Eternal Torment or Annihilation
David Hilborn, "The Nature of Hell" Reported by the Evangelical Alliance Commission on unity and truth among Evangelicals" April 2000
Peterson Robert A., "Hell on Trial: The case for Eternal Punishment
Fudge Edward William, "The Fire That Consumes"

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

The Hell Debate

...THE HELL DEBATE A Paper Presented to Professor Beauchamp of Liberty University Lynchburg, VA BIBL 350 By Gordon C. Wilson December 13, 2012 INTRODUCTION In this paper, I will give a brief overview of the nature of hell, the classical view and the annihilationist view. For the last decade, there has been a significant debate surrounding this very topic within evangelical circle. It is hard to understand how God can let his children be punished in hell, being he is an all-loving God and creator. However, John 3:36 makes it clear for all of us. (He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life; and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him)(Dake, Finis).” The Bible teaches that God loves you so much that the Creator of this universe (Jesus Christ) came to "taste death" for every man. Jesus wasn't just some baby for a manger scene. He is God come in the flesh to destroy the power of death and hell--He holds the keys, people! If you say yes to Jesus, hell won't be your final destination. If you say no to Jesus, the lake of fire will be your eternal home. There is no getting out and no comfort--it's everlasting. Regardless of whether you believe it or not, hell exists and the Bible says that it is never full. I've heard folks say that hell is not mentioned in the Bible or that hell is just the grave. Well, let's take a look at what the Authorized King James Bible says. Here are a few scriptures that deal with hell...

Words: 1997 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

The Hell Debate

...Liberty University The Hell Debate A RESEARCH PAPER SUBMITTED TO Dr. Marshall Wicks IN COMPLETION OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR Fundamental Theological Issues BY Ritchie Moore SCHOOL’S LOCATION: Lynchburg, Virginia August 9, 2011 This paper definitely has an interesting topic, the nature of Hell. In the next couple of pages I’m hoping to explain why I believe there is a hell and what that entails, with a little help from some other documentation and beliefs. Growing up I think everyone has their own perspective of that place. Christians unquestionably think about hell a lot differently than unbelievers. One of the biggest point is that there are some people that use hell as a swear word. I imagine Christians would consider hell to be something more than just a bad word, it could be the worst place that a person could ever go after they die. As everyone knows our beliefs are part of the good news of God. God wants us to love him freely, He loves us and wants to be loved in return. Love cannot be forced, it has to be given freely and hell represents the possibility of saying no to God finally. Hell is not God’s choice as much as it is ours. Hell is more about refusing life than suffering punishment, because God loves us even in his judging of us.[1] It has been said that hell is a spiritual and material furnace of fire where its victims are delicately tortured in their minds and in their...

Words: 2658 - Pages: 11

Free Essay

Hell Debate

...Angelology and Satanology Ethical Dualism means that there are two mutual hostile forces of beings in the world, one being the source of all that is good, the other the source of all evil. There were two challenges of Satan that is recorded in Genesis 3 and Matthew 4. There was the temptation of Adam and Eve and also Jesus the son of God. Out of these two challenges the rewards of success would be great for Satan. The results of Eve’s sin were great and gave a big victory for Satan. Satan approached Jesus through the same three avenues of temptation as he approached Eve. (Matt. 4: 3; 5, 6; 8, 9). Satan was unsuccessful this time. God is the only eternal self-existent being that we read about which is represented in the Bible. Satan is not self-existent so he had to have a point of origin. God created Satan as a leading Angel who later wanted to become more powerful than God himself. Satan wanted to be worshipped. When reading the Chapter Ezekiel from the Bible it reveals more about a "king" who is obviously Lucifer. God did not create evil however he does reward and punishes according to our obedience. God created his angels and appointed arch angels who were highest of all angels. Since the arch angel had such high power they believed they could overpower God and went against God. The high power angel thought he could persuade Gods people into his world. Punishment came upon the angel and he was considered a fallen angel (Satan). God is the Father of all spirits including...

Words: 673 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Late Adulthood

...Hell Debate __________________ A Paper Presented to Liberty University __________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Theology 350 __________________ by Tirsa Woodson July 3, 2015 The Hell Debate The debate over the nature of hell is one that can bring out the best and the worst in biblical exegesis. Everyone nowadays is concerned about the enemy (Satan) and delete hell existence. The beginning signs that Jesus is coming soon, frightens the human race. We were taught when God returns, it will be judgment day. John reveals this judgement will take pace during the last days, when God will conquer all who have and would defy him and to rescue the righteous. Judgment meant the outcome of an individual, will they go to heaven with God or to hell with the devil. There are many misconceptions about Hell, rather the lost will burn forever or annihilated. Hell is real. Universalism believes everyone will eventually be saved, while Christian believe we all will be judged for the deeds we have done. First, the Annihilationist believe  that the unrighteous will not suffer eternal torment, but that they will, after being justly punished according to their deeds, be annihilated and cease to exist. Also they believe that hell is eternal in consequence, not duration the wicked shall be no more (Boyd & Eddy). Secondly the classical view states that the wicked will be cast into hell that supports the traditional...

Words: 1329 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Theological Critique: Four Views on Hell

...UNIVERSITY THEOLOGICAL CRITIQUE: FOUR VIEWS ON HELL A THEOLOGICAL CRITIQUE SUBMITTED TO DR. ROBERT WETMORE IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE COURSE THEO 530 LIBERTY BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY BY PETER J. FILIPIAK SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................1 SUMMARY.............................................................................................................1 CRITICAL INTERACTION...................................................................................2 The Literal View...........................................................................................2 The Metaphorical View................................................................................4 The Purgatorial View....................................................................................5 The Conditional View..................................................................................6 CONCLUSION........................................................................................................7 BIBLIOGRAPHY....................................................................................................9 Introduction Four Views on Hell is a book edited by William Crockett in which four contributing...

Words: 2461 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Mohammed In Dante's Inferno

...While Dante’s placement of Mohammed in Hell is, in itself, implied, the latter’s damnation not only comes from a sense of divine justice but also acts as a reflection on and a warning to Dante on his individual journey to God. Dante, along with many of his peers and influences, views Islam as a false sect broken off from the core of Christianity and Mohammed as a Christian with a corrupted view of doctrine that lures potential followers from a true path of righteousness. Mohammed, like Dante, feels a spiritual discontentment that leads him on a reflective journey; however, as Mohammed turns his personal path, beliefs, and interpretations into its own doctrine, he varies from Dante’s poetic but applicable tale of salvation. Dante’s encounter...

Words: 2972 - Pages: 12

Free Essay

Odysseus Trip to Underworld

...Underworld, Hell, Hades ECT (A comparison of the underworld from The Odyssey and The Aneid.) Where one goes after death is a mystery. No scientist has proof, no Christian has proof, no ONE has any proof. All this world has is guesses, and what we are told through religious texts; and from there is where people draw their own personal opinion. “I cannot conceive of a God who rewards and punishes his creatures, or has a will of the kind that we experience in ourselves. Neither can I nor would I want to conceive of an individual that survives his physical death; let feeble souls, from fear or absurd egoism, cherish such thoughts. I am satisfied with the mystery of the eternity of life and with the awareness and a glimpse of the marvelous structure of the existing world, together with the devoted striving to comprehend a portion, be it ever so tiny, of the Reason that manifests itself in nature.” (Einstein) However in ancient Greece and Rome the afterlife did not have the illusive idea of a heaven and hell, they simply had an underworld ruled by the brother of the great god Zeus; Hades, or in Latin Pluto. However the underworld was described differently and similarly in several different cases, in several different takes of the stories. For example, Edith Hamilton in part IV of her book Greek Mythology, describes the visits of Odysseus and Aeneas to the underworld. Although they do relate in some ways, in others they are completely different. The decent into the underworld...

Words: 1094 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

"Hamlet's Ghost- to Believe or Not to Believe”

...characters' motives arise as these themes are portrayed. Questions regarding Hamlet's love for Ophelia or his sanity arise. However, these questions develop throughout the story. The most important question arises at the beginning of the story in Act 1, and affects Hamlet’s every thought and action thereafter. Is the King's ghost a good spirit, merely seeking justice or an evil spirit sent to corrupt Hamlet? Perhaps the ghost is genuinely that of the dead king, but the fact that the ghost uses Hamlet to exact revenge and demands he commit the mortal sin of murder, clearly shows it to be an evil, malicious demon from hell. During the era in which Hamlet was written, there was a common belief of demonic intrusion, and corruption by the devil. Even today, it is not too difficult to find people who will agree that specters are evil demons, sent up from the bowels of hell to corrupt and destroy the living. In fact, a recent CBS poll reveals that almost half of all Americans believe in evil spirits, and that the dead can return in certain places and situations (Alfano). Because of this belief, the appearance of the spirit, along with the assumption of its wickedness, would not be considered unusual then or now. Subsequently, it is believed that demons can take any form in order to deceive another into committing a sin which will cost them their soul. Often times this was written about in plays, such as William Shakespeare’s King Lear where the character Edgar, pretending to be an...

Words: 1944 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Doctor Faustus

...Doctor Faustus Christopher Marlowe Prologue * Chorus comes on and tells audience that the play isn’t going to be about war, valiant deeds, or love, but all about the fortunes of some guy named Faustus * Faustus was born in a town called Roda in Germany and was raised by relatives in Wittenberg * He excels at his studies of Theology, so much that he’s very quickly given the title of doctor of divinity and can out debate anyone * Faustus’s pride is a serious problem * Because Faustus is so proud he’s not happy being a mere theologian, so he opts instead to study magic Act 1 Scene 1 * Meet Faustus, he’s busy figuring out what he wants to do with his life – he mulls over the options: philosophy, medicine, law – he rejects them all for being too boring and too pointless * Every time he reads the Bible Faustus can’t help but conclude that man’s sins give him no hope of heaven anyways * Faustus decides to study magic because a magician is almost like a god * He tells his servant Wagner to fetch Valdes and Cornelius, his friends, who happen to be a couple of magicians * Before they stop by the Good Angel enters and tells Faustus to lay the books of magic aside and to read the scriptures instead * Bad Angel disagrees & thinks Faust should go ahead with his plan because he’ll be godlike * Faustus is convinced and begins to wax poetic about all the thing he’ll do once he masters magic – especially excited about the whole...

Words: 4566 - Pages: 19

Premium Essay

Hamlet

...because of flawed personality traits but may bring much misfortune on themselves. As the story unfolds, in an attempt to seek vengeance for his father, suffocated by his own flaws such as his obsession with revenge, confusion on the meaning of life, and procrastination in taking action, Hamlet dooms himself to the misfortune of self destruction. Often times, in outrage people will seek revenge and occasionally become obsessed with the idea, much like Hamlet did. Hamlet was overcome with anger when he discovered his father's murderer; in all his frustration and bitterness he became infatuated with the idea of revenge, surrendering to insanity, and eventually leading himself to self destruction. While contemplating a decision Hamlet debates with himself, “Now might I do it pat. Now he is a-praying. And now I’ll do ’t. And so he goes to heaven. And so am I revenged.—That would be scanned. A villain kills my father, and, for that, I, his sole son, do this same villain send to heaven. Oh, this is hire and salary, not revenge”(3.3.74-80). This reveals his insanity to me because he is investing far too much thought into it his deed. I think that Hamlet so desperately wishes his uncle pure misery that he believes he will only do him a favor if he kills him while in prayer because Claudius will go to heaven for repentance. Believing that he can determine whether Claudius goes to heaven or not based on the timing of his murder makes Hamlet look foolish. Another flaw that led...

Words: 852 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Milton in Paradise Lost

...Milton in Paradise Lost Immediately after the prologue, Milton raises the question of how Adam and Eve’s disobedience occurred and explains that their actions were partly due to a serpent’s deception. This serpent is Satan, and the poem joins him and his followers in Hell, where they have just been cast after being defeated by God in Heaven. Satan lies stunned beside his second-in-command, Beelzebub, in a lake of fire that gives off darkness instead of light. Breaking the awful silence, Satan bemoans their terrible position, but does not repent of his rebellion against God, suggesting that they might gather their forces for another attack. Beelzebub is doubtful; he now believes that God cannot be overpowered. Satan does not fully contradict this assessment, but suggests that they could at least pervert God’s good works to evil purposes. The two devils then rise up and, spreading their wings, fly over to the dry land next to the flaming lake. But they can undertake this action only because God has allowed them to loose their chains. All of the devils were formerly angels who chose to follow Satan in his rebellion, and God still intends to turn their evil deeds toward the good. Once out of the lake, Satan becomes more optimistic about their situation. He calls the rest of the fallen angels, his legions, to join him on land. They immediately obey and, despite their wounds and suffering, fly up to gather on the plain. Milton lists some of the more notable of the angels whose names...

Words: 636 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

“Eschatology: the Destiny of the Unsaved”

...“Eschatology: The Destiny of the Unsaved” Reconciling a good, loving God with the idea of eternal punishment is one of the most difficult things I have had to do in my Christian life. How can a God who loves us enough to shed His own blood for us then, at the end of our lives, send some of us away from Him to be punished forever? There are some different theories about what happens to us after we die. Eternal punishment is the idea that sin must be punished and those who have not received the gift of salvation will be punished forever for their sins. Annihilationism is the idea that, rather than eternal punishment, some souls will simply cease to exist. There are three main forms of this. The first says that all human beings simply cease to exist at death. The second says that God imparts immorality to the redeemed human beings and allows the rest of humankind to cease to exist at death. The third says that humankind is immortal and fulfills its destiny in salvation. In this third form of annihilationism, reprobates cease to exist, either by a direct act of God or by the corrosive effect of evil. Universalism claims that all will be saved. The Bible uses some different words when referring to a place of torment. Sheol is the word used in the Hebrew texts to describe a place where all souls go after death. Hades is the Greek equivalent. Sheol is a much broader word referring simply to the place where souls go upon death. Hades narrows the concept somewhat and separates...

Words: 821 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Where Are You Going and Where Have You Been?

...Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been? In the story “Where are you going, where have you been” by Joyce Oates is about a beautiful young girl, Connie, that is trying to grow up too fast. She obsesses over her looks, friends, music, and day dreams about boys all day. She gets great pleasure in the fact that many boys of all ages find her very attractive. This though gets her in a lot of trouble with a boy name Arnold. This boy puts on a fake façade to get Connie to come to him. He manipulates her and deceives her. Arnold friend could also be interpreted as “Arch fiend” suggesting that he may be the devil. Many things that the author Joyce suggest leads the reader to believe that he may be the devil. For one his pale skin and his hair is wild, almost as though he is wearing a wig and hiding some horns underneath. When he walks he wobbles almost suggesting that he may have hooves as feet, just like the devil. Demon or not, however, his strangely mismatched appearance adds to the threatening quality of his calm voice and seemingly gentle coaxing as he tries to convince Connie to come outside. Connie at first is strangely attracted to Arnold in a very dangerous way. He is a very attractive, sexy older man that is showing some interest in her. He is also very alluring to her. Something about him keeps her interested. He offers to take her away from her very unhappy life and give her a better one in a field with flowers and sunshine. Soon though he beings to make threats and demands...

Words: 289 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Essay - Philsophy

...Philosophy 1010 Rebellion - Fyodor Dostoevsky In the passage where Ivan is talking about atonement for the dead, and the tortured children, he poses some questions to his brother Aloysha. For example, “They must be atoned for, or there can be no harmony, but how? How are you going to atone for them? Is it possible? By their being avenged? But what do I care for avenging them? What do I care for a hell for oppressors? What good can hell do, since those children have already been tortured, and what becomes of harmony, if there is hell?” What I understand from Ivan’s passage here is that he wants to pursue and better understand the overall point of the situation. If the oppressors are going to have to deal with the evil of hell in the after life, why should they get to live the rest of their human life in bliss, while the child has already had his life and its opportunities taken away? I think his first premise (P1) is that evil has a purpose, but the purpose of evil isn’t worth dealing with. I think that this is pretty much saying that, we do need evil for “harmony” but having to deal with this cruel evil isn’t worth waiting for the harmony that comes along with it. Why should the child have to be tortured for the harmony to be achieved? Why can’t we skip the evil step and have harmony as something that doesn’t hurt us before it becomes better? The second premise that I took from Ivan’s passage is (P2) the justification of evil has worse consequences than positive aspects...

Words: 531 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Lyric Poetry Journal

...Where are we? What the hell is going on? The dust has only just begun to fall, Crop circles in the carpet, sinking, feeling. Spin me round again and rub my eyes. This can't be happening. When busy streets a mess with people would stop to hold their heads heavy. Hide and seek. Trains and sewing machines. All those years they were here first. Oily marks appear on walls Where pleasure moments hung before. The takeover, the sweeping insensitivity of this still life. Hide and seek. Trains and sewing machines. (Oh, you won't catch me around here) Blood and tears, They were here first. Mmm, what you say? Mm, that you only meant well? Well, of course you did. Mmm, what you say? Mm, that it's all for the best? Ah of course it is. Mmm, what you say? Mm, that it's just what we need? And you decided this. Mmm what you say? What did she say? Ransom notes keep falling out your mouth. Mid-sweet talk, newspaper word cut-outs. Speak no feeling, no I don't believe you. You don't care a bit. You don't care a bit. Ransom notes keep falling out your mouth. Mid-sweet talk, newspaper word cut-outs. Speak no feeling, no I don't believe you. You don't care a bit. You don't care a bit. You don't care a bit. You don't care a bit. You don't care a bit. You don't care a bit. You don't care a...

Words: 263 - Pages: 2