Free Essay

History of Art

In: Historical Events

Submitted By clementina
Words 2469
Pages 10
[pic]

“Did the development of a middle-class ‘public sphere’ significantly alter artistic practice during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries?”

In The Structural transformation of the Public Sphere[1], Jürgen Habermas describes how this area in social life, both separated from the “private sphere” and the “sphere of public authority”, where people can get together and freely discuss and identify societal problems and trough that even influence political action, has not always existed. Its creation was part of a long process that had its peak at the turn of the eighteenth century. He also explains how, although this phenomenon concerns the whole of the European society, the British case stands out.

The genesis of the public sphere is first of all associated to an economical factor. As a result from the modernization of the economy, based upon a systematic use of public credit and the free circulation of goods and capital, it is especially the city of London that expanded at a remarkable speed with the sudden and fast development of merchant banking and insurance, as well as warehousing and trading.

This new horizon of possibilities on terms of wealth and independence unfolds simultaneously to important shifts in the political arena. After years of blood spill trough civil war, which ended with the execution of King Charles I, a constitutional monarchy was finally established. The idea of a freer, more horizontal conception of social relations started to spread, and regardless of the fact that there still lay a gap between the aspiration of citizens becoming the main political actors and the actual realization of it, from then on Crown’s actions and Parliament’s decisions would be under constant commentary and criticism fuelled by the press, and the public authority would continuously be called before the forum of the –now wider and more literate- public.

As for the alterations on the intellectual framework a new generation of scientist and philosophers began to promote a less theological way of thinking, relaying on acquiring knowledge trough experimentation rather than theory.

These were just some of the components regarding the birth of the public sphere, the particularity laying on the fact that it is a portion of society emancipating itself from the aristocracy, financially, politically, and intellectually. The growing popularity of the coffee houses are a good example for this, because they represent a new physical space for exchanging opinions on almost any topic, engaging in political discussions, gossiping and talk about taste and culture.

The whole concept of culture as a subject that can be discussed is a novelty in the period[2]. As Blanning explains: “Culture was transformed from something which is representational into a commodity which could be desired for its own sake. Cultural industrialization had begun. The more that art objects were produced for the market, the more they escaped from the control of the old patrons – the court, the Church, and the nobles.”[3]

In this statement we recognize on one hand the economical factor as influential in artistic development, since the expanding commercial wealth engendered a new audience for it, as well as the changing of its function.

To answer the question that guides this essay I will point out some elements of two pictures, each emblematic to their period of production. The differences are not hard to spot, and on what follows I will try to link them to the social context of its creation.

I have already mentioned the growing artistic possibilities –regarding creation and acquisition- as one of the characteristics of eighteenth century England, which makes it unattainable to consider that contrasting only two pictures exhausts the possibilities of comparison. It is still worth it though, for some interesting conclusions are to be drawn even by mentioning only the most basic elements, allowing us to reflect on the relationship between art and social changes.

Minerva protecting Pax from Mars (Peace and War) [Image 1] was painted by Peter Paul Rubens between 1628 and 1630 and it displays many of the elements present in almost every painting of the period.

As for the political context of its creation, Rubens had been send on a diplomatic mission to Spain by King Charles I, and the scene depicted is an allegory to his attempt to establish peace between both kingdoms.

It is possible to interpret the whole political scenario if the viewer is familiar with the mythological characters and the relationship between them. But this knowledge was only accessible to the hierarchic upper section of population, those who had access to higher classical education, meaning that the public who is supposed to understand the messages behind this painting is very specifically delimitated. But even if one has not the means to infer all the elements in this painting and the meaning that lay behind them, what comes across inevitably is the grandeur, the theatricality and bold drama of the scene.

This painting, as well as most contemporary works is very ambitious in many senses. Art was one of the means on which the crown relayed to show power. “In England, the court guided the most important artistic decisions, strong in its belief that the function of art was to exalt the reigning dynasty.”[4] The crown took every decision in matters of taste and of what was desirable, everything included in a painting is a direct allusion to that what is supposed to be valuable.

Roy Strong explains how “courtiers were seen as heroes, kings became gods, actions were emblems, all of which demanded a viewer able to read the visual images unfolding before him. (…) Depending on an acceptance that seeing was believing, that the sage pictures he created had both a philosophical meaning and a moral force.”[5] In the example we are using, the depicted scenario has much in common with the ‘masques’, theatrical representations that were popular at the court of Charles I. There is no hint to a specific authority, the symbolism is flexible and open to interpretation but still, since the court has complete power over art production, it refers to how the nobility projects itself. On a general level it is possible to state that the court is trying to draw an impression of absolute power and transmit the greatness of kingship per se.

Art and cultural works had one specific function that was manipulated by the nobility. “Those who exercised power –monarchs, nobles, prelates- expressed their status in public in a concrete, non-abstract way, through insignia, clothing, gesture, or rhetoric. Power was both exercised and represented (in the sense of “being made present”) directly: ‘as long as the prince and the estates of the realm still “are” the land, instead of merely functioning as deputies for it, they are able to “re-present”; they represent their power “before” the people, instead of for the people”[6] articulates Blanning.

Regarding our example it is interesting to think about the figure of the artist: Rubens was one more member of court. The fact that he was sent for a diplomatic mission by the king himself shows that he was held in high esteem and also shows the dimensions that courtly patronage could adopt. At last it is interesting to mention Rubens Flemish origins, as for that time the most prominent artists were foreign.

If we now move over to analyze an artwork produced a century and a half later, such as Portrait of Sir William Chamber, Joseph Wilton and Sir Joshua Reynolds [Image 2] by John Francis Rigaud we recognize a much less dramatically scene: it shows a quotidian conversation between three men that happen to be senior officials of the Royal Academy of Arts -an architect, a sculptor and a painter. Rigaud himself was a member of the academy, which was founded in 1768 trough a personal act by King George III with the purpose of promoting art trough education and exhibition. From there emerged the so called ‘English school of art’, which got to rank among the most prestigious and well-known of the period.

Its creation is one of the answers to the emerging production and demand for art, which on one hand offered a world of opportunities for promising talents that came to London from all over the country, and on the other hand threatened to vulgarize those high-class values that were still hold in high esteem by the traditional elites. Solkin summarizes the controversies around its founding: “(…) certain tensions emerged within the audience for painting and between the mass of relatively inexperienced consumers and certain especially ambitious artists – tensions that burst out into a highly politicised schism with the founding of the Royal Academy in 1768.”[7]

Without going into the political aspects of it, it is interesting to note the growing interest in exhibiting art, a new habit in which the Royal Academy played the principal role. Because exhibiting was not only an answer to demands of the public, but also a way of showing a selection of what kind of art was valuable and which was not. In other words, it was a way to shape taste.

It is clear that this picture is not anymore addressed only to privileged court members: there are no allusions to kingship and the symbolic attributes -though still present- are reduced. On his comments on portraiture, Ogée insists upon one of its most important features being “its insistence on the naturalness of behaviour, as opposed to the static artifice of grand aristocratic portraiture. The conversational ideal called for more emphasis on movement and exchange, and the new painting were therefore designed to be more narrative than allegorical or emblematic.”[8]

This observation goes hand in hand with the previously mentioned intellectual climate of the period, where English contribution to enlightenment revolved around scientific experimentation. We also see reflected the new way of looking at nature –including human nature- from a more ‘sensible’ point of view, rather than theoretical. The quoted author also continues emphasizing the weight of the narrative aspect on these paintings, explaining it as closely related to the increasing literacy of society.

Another feature to be noted in relation to the middle class is the intention of highlighting status elements. Even though this group of people was trying to emancipate itself from courtly influence, which translates to patronage in matters of art, there remains an ambition to show high taste and morals. Vaughan states: “the bourgeois had mixed feelings towards the aristocrats. On the one hand they despised them for their arrogance and suppose idleness, on the other they wished to emulate their style and status. While more responsive to a ‘modern’ taste of advanced artist, they did not wish to appear uncultured and needed to be reassured that the art they liked was also tasteful.”[9] This can be identified in the triple portrait trough the Greek sculpture in the background, alluding to the still esteemed classical education, and the fashionable way the sitters are dressed and distinguished with international emblems (eg. The Order of the Polar Star on Chambers).

Vaughan writes also on the shifting position of the artist stating “(…) a new understanding of creativity was emerging which was to become the norm in modern times. This was the view of the artist as original genius, whose works made visible unique and innate gifts, rather than the fruits of earnest learning.”[10] This painting shows its sitters at ease combining their role as artists but also their condition of gentlemen - a virtuous public way of being as servers of the king with a private one.

Even though there are infinitely more points to interpret from a painting in relation with the social context of its creation, the few ones I have mentioned to this point seem to guide in one clear direction referring to the question that guided this essay: it is undeniable that there has been a notably big shift in the ways of producing art during the transition from the seventeenth century to the eighteenth, and that this happened hand in hand with social changes turns out evident.

Sure, the growing economical opportunities made a wider audience for art possible, an audience impregnated with new, less court-orientated values. One can definitely state that in deed the development of a middle-class ‘public sphere’ significantly altered artistic production.

Nonetheless, I would like to add the possibility of thinking of this process as retroactive, considering that the alterations on artistic production may have also made their contribution to the development of a middle-class ‘public sphere’. This way, the phenomenon falls into the category of all social studies, for which lineal interpretations are always limiting, and trough which one can draw conclusions but hardly ever prove one true.

To summarize, far from trying to verify which transition actually enabled the other one, I believe it is interesting to think of changes in society and changes in art as rising in a parallel manner, “contributing to each other’s definition trough the period”[11] as Oigée well says.

2201 Words

[pic]

[Image 1] - Peter Paul Rubens Minerva Protecting Pax from Mars or Peace and War (1628)

[pic]

[Image 2] - John Francis Rigaud, Portrait of Sir William Chambers, Joseph Wilton and Sir Joshua Reynolds (1782)

Bibliography

Bindman, D. (ed.) The History of British Art, 1600-1870 (New Haven and London, 2008)

Bermingham A. and Brewer J. (ed. )The consumption of culture, 1600-1800. Image, Object, Text. (Routledge, 1995)

Blanning, T. The Power of Culture and the Culture of Power: Old Regime Europe, 1660-1789 (Oxford, 2002)

Craske, M. Art in Europe 1700-1830 (Oxford, 1997)

Giorgi, R. European Art of the Seventeenth Century (The J. Paul Getty Museum, 2008)

Habermas, J. The Structural transformation of the Public Sphere (Polity Press, 1989)

Solkin, D. Painting for money. The Visual Arts and the Public Sphere in Eighteen-Century England (Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 1993)

Strong, R. Splendour at court. Renaissance spectacle and illusion. (Weinfeld and Nicolson, 1973)

Vaughan, W. British Painting, the golden age. (Thames and Hudson, 1999)

Paintings

Peter Paul Rubens, Minerva protects Pax from Mars (‘Peace and War’) 1629-30. Oil on canvas, 203,5 x 298 cm. National Gallery, London.

John Francis Rigaud, Sir William Chambers; Joseph Wilton: Sir Joshua Reynolds 1782. Oil on canvas, 118,1 x 143,5 cm. National Portrait Gallery, London.

-----------------------
[1] Habermas, J. (1989)
[2] Habermas even questions the existence of culture itself before this period, mentioning its ‘invention’ as one more of the processes of change in the eighteenth century
[3] Blanning, T. (2002) p.9

[4] Giorgi, R. (2008) p.217
[5] Strong, R. (1973) p.7

[6] Blanning, T. (2002)
[7] Solkin, (1993) p. 3
[8] Ogée, F. in Bindman (ed.) (2008) p. 160
[9] Vaughan, W. (1999) p. 12
[10] Ibid. p. 126
[11] Ogée, F. in Bindman (ed.) (2008) p. 154

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Art History

...Art history From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search This article is about the academic discipline of art history. For an overview of the history of art worldwide, see History of art. For other uses, see Art history (disambiguation). This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (November 2011) Venus de Milo on display at the Louvre Art history has historically been understood as the academic study of objects of art in their historical development and stylistic contexts, i.e. genre, design, format, and style.[1] This includes the "major" arts of painting, sculpture, and architecture as well as the "minor" arts of ceramics, furniture, and other decorative objects. As a term, art history (also history of art) encompasses several methods of studying the visual arts; in common usage referring to works of art and architecture. Aspects of the discipline worms. As the art historian Ernst Gombrich once observed, "the field of art history [is] much like Caesar's Gaul, divided in three parts inhabited by three different, though not necessarily hostile tribes: (i) the connoisseurs, (ii) the critics, and (iii) the academic art historians".[2] As a discipline, art history is distinguished from art criticism, which is concerned with establishing a relative artistic value upon individual works with respect to others of...

Words: 6080 - Pages: 25

Free Essay

Art History

...to Modern Art Dr. Dwight Smith What I’ve Learned in Renaissance to Modern Art I’ve learned so much information in the class titled “Renaissance to Modern Art” and I want to start off with my new found knowledge of Art History. According to Wikipedia, the history of art is “the history of any activity or product made by humans in a visual form for aesthetical or communicative purposes, expressing ideas, emotions or, in general, a worldview.” This field of "art history" was developed in the Western world, and originally was focused solely on European art history. Gradually, over the course of the 20th century, a wider vision of art history has developed. Thus, art history is now viewed to encompass all visual art, from the sculptures in Western Europe to the paintings in China. Also according to this source, the history of art is often told as a chronology of masterpieces created in each civilization. It is said that the Wonders of the World are the epitome of high culture through the stories that are conveyed. Art history spans the entire history of humankind, from prehistoric times to the twenty-first century. No matter what you choose to observe, you can find visual arts that challenge someone’s creative side and inspire them to find beauty in the things manmade. In modern times, art history has emerged as a discipline that specializes in teaching people how to evaluate and interpret works of art based on their own perspective. Art history has frequently...

Words: 1761 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Art History

...Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history Art history ...

Words: 270 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Art History at Hunter

...THE HISTORY OF ART HISTORY AT HUNTER COLLEGE Hunter College was founded in 1870 in order to provide a liberal education to young women who wished to become teachers. It was first known as the Normal College of the City of New York, "normal" as in école normale, a school for the training of teachers. The founding of the College was part of a master plan for free higher education for all the citizens of New York City. This system eventually became the largest municipal system of higher education in the United States. It led to the establishment, in 1961, of the City University of New York, of which Hunter College was a founding member. The Normal College was intended to provide specialized teacher training but it gradually developed and expanded its curriculum until it became a fully accredited liberal arts college for women. In 1914, its name was changed to Hunter College of the City of New York to honor Thomas Hunter, its first president. Male students were admitted to the previously exclusively female student body beginning in 1964, but its importance to the education of women accounted for its national reputation. By 1970 more American women who had earned Ph.D.'s had received their undergraduate education at Hunter College than at any other institution in the United States. It is no exaggeration to say that in its first century of existence no college in the United States contributed more to the education of women than Hunter College. As the College grew the...

Words: 481 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Culpeper Art History

...Art 100 – Art Appreciation Museum of Culpeper Many artists throughout time have captured the rich history of Culpeper. These artists depicted the evolution of times, with the wars Culpeper was involved in and the beauty of the architecture of this city. These work of arts are now on display at the Museum of Culpeper and during a visit on the fifteenth of November, I was able to witness this history that was captured by these artist throughout the life of Culpeper. The Parting by John Paul Strain depicts both the militant history and the architecture of its time but the main focus of this picture is of General Hill and his wife. The focus on General Hill and his wife is delineated by the space used by John Paul Strain. He places the loving couple at the front and center of the painting pulling the eye of the viewer straight to them. With the use of oil on canvas, Strain was able to capture this moment of love at the romantic time of day, sunset as he heads off to the Battle of Fredericksburg and his wife is getting a final goodbye. With General and Mrs. Hill embraced in a sign of love, this leads one to believe it was based in Romanticism. The Parting was painted circa 1862-1862, could easily be seen as John Paul Strain following in the wake of the Romanticism style that occurred between 1820 and 1850 in Europe. Along with the timing of this painting, Romanticism celebrates nature, rural life and the common people. The Parting shows a house in the woods of a General of the...

Words: 1226 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Art History

...Tyisha Tomlinson Essay 1 Is all art worth studying? Art has long been a way of releasing creative expression. From long ago artist have used their creativeness to tell stories and invoke feelings of pleasure. Also art has been a way of understanding people and the way they lived and what they did in their time. "Hall of the Bulls"," Bull-Leaping", and "Interior of the Tomb of the Leopards" are three art pieces that tell the history of its time. The "Hall of the Bulls" was created between 15000-13000 BCE. This painting was done on the wall of a rock in a cave. It is considered the Stone Age style. The subject of this painting is animals primarily bulls. According to Gardner's Art through the Ages historians wondered why the painting consists only of animals. It was later thought that it was a way of having power or control of the animals. The cave in which the painting is in Lascaux, near Montignac, France. Unlike the "Hall of the Bulls" the "Bull-leaping" painting is near Eastern and Egyptian art. The painting was created around 1450-1400 BCE. According to Gardner's Art through the Ages only fragments of the full composition survive. The remainder is a modern restoration. The style of this painting is Greek Knossos. This painting represents people and animals. It depicts the sport of bull leaping. The people in the painting are very agile and revealed to be able to master the animal. A Minoan artist created this painting. The Interior of the "Tomb...

Words: 425 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Art History

...Art History Introduction The Conquests of Alexander the Great culminated to the establishment of Hellenistic Kingdoms in South-West Asia from 323 BC to 146 BC. This led to the spread of Hellenistic cultures to these regions. The Hellenistic civilization and culture encompasses a blend between the Ancient Greek culture, religion and art and the South-West Asia art, culture and religion. The Head of Bodhisattva contained in the Cantor Museum encompasses the head of a Buddhist being that easily attained Buddhahood, but forgoes his Nirvana with the aim of aiding those in the world to walk in the Buddhist path. This Head was created in the Gandhara Ancient kingdom located in South West Asia. This Head was created using the Gandhara or Greco-Buddhist art that was highly influenced by Hellenistic Art. The Head of Alexander the Great encompasses an art created during the Hellenistic Civilization that spread after the Conquests of Alexander the Great. The fact that both The Head of Alexander the Great and The Head of Bodhisattva were created under Hellenistic and Greco-Buddhist art, cultural, religious and artistic connections can be identified between them. Cultural Connections Both Heads were created during the Hellenistic civilization whose major characteristic was the Hellenistic culture. This culture was however influenced by the indigenous cultures of the conquests culminating into the Greco Buddhist culture. During the creation of both heads the main language utilized in Alexandria...

Words: 1354 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Art History

...Art of South and Southeast Asia before 1200: Portrayal of the Buddha Sabrina Hashem 04.12.2011 Art History Survey I Christine I. Wilson This paper analyzes the art of Southeast Asia before 1200, specifically the depiction of Buddha. A general idea of Buddhism and Buddhist art is presented as well as two specific works of Buddhist art. A study of how different cultures and time period influenced these pieces follows their descriptions, and finally a critique of each and a comparison of the two are also presented. Buddhism began in the late medieval period in India during the rule of the Pala dynasty with one man, Siddhartha Gautama. Known today as Buddha Shakyamuni, Siddhartha was born to a ruler of a small kingdom in present day Nepal. With the rise of an urban society replacing the agricultural lifestyle this was a time of great social turmoil in the sub-continental India. The Aryan people, with whom caste system began in Hinduism, became more and more complex in their social and religious practices. The Brahmins, the priestly class grew powerful and began to impose rigid ideas about social order to ensure their place in power over the rest of the society. Many sages and philosophers at the time began to resist this unequal society and began preaching of social equality and a more direct and personal access to the spiritual world. Siddhartha would have experienced this revolutionary movement as a young boy. Around this time he also encountered sickness and death among...

Words: 1536 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Art History

...two artists that live in the same time period, have the same culture, but have so different styles of painting. The Italian Renaissance started in the 13th and 14th Century, leading into the High Renaissance, Renaissance in the North, and the late Renaissance in Italy. In Italy the society after the Middle Ages was powerful city states, extensive trade, and banking had developed. Education was a priority; in Italy the first University for Greek Studies was established. Most Scholars referred to themselves as humanists, not only did they believe education should teach the early Christian hood, but also liberal arts, grammar, poetry, history, politics, and philosophy. Renaissance humanists believed strongly in knowledge, they felt that God created mankind to pursue knowledge and strive to their full potential. Thus, this leads into artists creating visual elements of art to teach education. The main patron of artwork was The Church, wealthy independents, and merchant-princes. The Church paid the finest artists to paint stories of Bible references, because most people in this time period were illiterate. Examples for The Church would be “Bellini, Pieta,” “Leonardo, Virgin and St. Anne,” and “Leonardo, The Last Supper”. All three of these artworks illustrate a biblical story. Also another patron was Pope Julius II; he commissioned Michelangelo to paint the ceiling of The Sistine Chapel. Well-known artist of the Renaissance time period was Leonardo Da Vinci and Michelangelo....

Words: 2112 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Art History

...The two different scared spaces that I choose to research are The Pantheon and St. Stanislaus Kostka Parish. The Pantheon is known as a temple built in Rome, Italy originally in 27 BC. This temple was first dedicated to all Gods, which is also known as Paganism and transformed into a Roman Catholic Church later in history. As for St. Stanislaus, this is a Roman Catholic Church that is located in Coatesville, Pennsylvania and was founded in 1907. The Pantheon and St. Stanislaus are both currently considered under Roman Catholicism yet, have different history behind their religion as the Pantheon originated as a Pagan religion and St. Stanislaus has always been Catholic. These scared spaces share the similarity in Catholicism however; their unique architect and history are very different. St. Stanislaus is a beautiful stone building with a large triangular peak where the cross sits on top. The front of the space has four columns that stick out of the building. The entrance is very simple with a small porch that leads to one main entrance way. There are three small rounded windows that are not translucent and look very dark and gray to the eye. Aside from the architect of the building, there are saint statues in the front of St. Stanislaus; the saint that this church is named after. From the outside of this building the structure is old and aged looking yet, the inside is where the beauty lies. Statues line the inside of this church from facial marble structures on the walls...

Words: 898 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Art History

...The coast of the Gulf of Mexico was inhabited between 250 and 500 C.E. Here, many different sculptures were created to represent different aspects of the people of that time. The Winged Bat Figure (fig. 1) is an example of this from a region of Mexico that is now known as Veracruz. The Winged Bat Figure shows how the people of Veracruz were a very mythologically-oriented society who created objects for situations that pertained to death and had funerary purposes. This terracotta sculpture depicts a seated bat with its wings extended. It has oblong ears on its round face. The bat’s left ear is chipped while the right is very well intact. Its wide-set eyes are two dark, small circles. Beneath its left eye is a black diamond shaped marking. The center of its face is marked by a vertical indentation. The lips of this creature are large; so large that they protrude off its face. Its two front dull fangs are askew. The abdomen of the bat is shaped like the top half of a wine bottle and its neck is disproportional to the rest of its body; it is a fraction longer than it should be. Its tongue sticks out and ends at the part of its chest where the two decorative bands meet. Together, the bands form a shape that looks very similar to the bat’s tongue. Below these bands is a horizontal strap that separates this double band formation from the single band that covers the bat’s genital area. The bulbous decorative features on the top right and bottom left of each wing resemble...

Words: 1510 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Art History

...During the Renaissance, art throughout Europe was going through a metamorphosis. Changing with the people as the world grew inventively and intellectually. We can see this change illustrated by the new contraptions and techniques used and passed on by artists of the time period. Leonardo Di Vinci was a great source for intellectualism. Fascinated by the human anatomy, his books were filled to the brink with detailed notes and drawings. He experimented broadly and now several of his works have become famous throughout the world and he is respected for his innovative thinking. In his painting of the Last Supper, Leonardo paints the usual scene of Jesus sitting at the table in the act of telling his disciples that one of them will betray him. Unlike the usual layout however, Leonardo does not separate Judas from the rest by having him sit on the other side of the table to draw the attention of the observer, but in the midst of the others. Leonardo also creates a rhythm to the painting, grouping each three disciples in a cluster with arms stretched out usually towards Jesus. Having taken many years to create this masterpiece, the most innovative portion of this work was not the subject matter to my personal opinion, but that Leonardo experimented with a new way of painting. In this mixture of Tempera and oil, Leonardo attempted to discover a new media of painting. While this trial was not a success and the picture chipped with time, it is with mistakes like these which spawn success...

Words: 504 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Art History

...Art History 1 June 3, 2013 Art and the Consciousness of Early Man The paintings carried out on rock surfaces, which constitute parietal art, caused the curiosity of lots of scientists. These paintings are present in many places of the world; the oldest can have more than 40,000 years. The dating of the prehistoric traces was difficult, as well the interpretation and reasons of the paintings, from anthropomorphic figures to abstract forms of signs. These paintings on the caves represent a universal artistic expression because it was found at various periods on our five continents. They used many techniques to express art, but one of them was painting with the brush. The brush could be manufactured with the hair of animals and even of vegetable materials. Paintings were monochromatic or polychromatic (Cave of Lascaux). Another technique was painting with the finger, which were made with the finger coated painting (Cave of Covalanas). At that time, when the first arts were created, they already made use of some technique to trace contours (punctuated horses of the Cave of Pech Merle), to fill a surface (Cave of Lascaux), or to make prints of negative hands (Caves of Gargas) by puffing up on paintings. Beyond the techniques of analysis and study, parietal art poses to the researcher the insoluble enigma of understanding. Prints of hands with mutilated fingers (or deformed by the disease?) found in” Cueva de Las Manos” in Argentina, is an example of problematic interpretation...

Words: 368 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Art History

...Colby Hurst Art History It can be argued that the Minoans were Europe’s first great civilization. Their culture was very different and complex. There were a number of rituals that was performed. Some say that the Minoans conducted sacrifices of bulls whose horns were made of gold. Whether this is true or false there was one fascinating activity that the Minoans conducted that involved bulls. Bull jumping. Minoan Crete is arguable the first culture in the Agean to provide iconographic evidence of a sporting activity held in the Bronze Age. Representation of the bull as a symbol is in art and decoration in the palace of Knossos. In the Mediterranean civilizations where the bull was the subject of veneration and worship. Some have argued that there was a bull cult, others religion. Bull jumping is thought to have been a key ritual in the religion of the Minoan civilization in Bronze Age Crete. It was a pacific activity. The horns of the bull were used to jump over the bull and turn around. This sport required good athletics and a lot of courage. In today’s society violence often mean individual success and is accepted maybe even encouraged. Killing the bull would mean winning the fight. The ancient ritual of bull jumping and doesn’t share this concept of violence. There was no opponent to the fight and no weapons; still whoever jumped the bull was considered a hero. The individuals who attempted the jump was considered heroes and those who completed the jump a divine...

Words: 308 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Art and History

...83-98 83 Abstracts/Résumés pp. xv-xxi We Practice What We Preach: A Local History of a Community-Based, Student/Faculty Art Exhibition (2002-09) Elizabeth Auger Ashworth Nipissing University Daniel H. Jarvis Nipissing University Purpose of the Exhibitions Student-organized exhibitions hold the potential to greatly enhance the visual arts school curriculum. Burton (2004, 2001), for example, contends that there are a number of multi-faceted benefits for art students, art teachers, and for the art education program in general through the implementation of student-organized exhibitions. In Exhibiting Student Art (2004), he concludes: The key to successful student art exhibitions rests in the knowledge and skills students learn from doing it firsthand. . . . They need to immerse themselves in various aspects of art exhibition, from preparing and presenting art to other people to exploring alternatives of scale, venue, theme, and purpose. . . . When exhibitions of student art are presented well, parents, teachers, and administrators recognize and appreciate the value and meaning of art in the school curriculum. Exhibitions of student art convey a continuous message that the quality of ideas, the depth of issues, and the magnitude of expression are © 2009 CRAE - RCÉA & AUTHORS/AUTEURS 84 Elizabeth Auger Ashworth & Daniel H. Jarvis displayed along with and through art. (p. 46) Student art exhibition events can address socio-economic issues (Russell-Bowie, 2005), function...

Words: 4629 - Pages: 19