Free Essay

How and Why Should Parliament Be Made More Effective?

In: Other Topics

Submitted By oldfieldhenry
Words 1983
Pages 8
How and why should parliament be made more effective?

Parliament is the sovereign body in the United Kingdom and so it is vital, for the wellbeing of democracy, that parliament not only exists but is also effective. Parliament plays the role of the Legislative and, as a result, is required to be as effective as possible to assure that laws are well thought out, benefit the whole of society and most of all maintain democracy. However, many people feel that certain aspects within Parliament limit its effectiveness and they feel these features need to be reformed in order for Parliament to carry out its function correctly.
Firstly, the most obvious way to make Parliament more effective would be to reform the electoral system. Currently, Westminster elections use the system of First-past-the-post where the candidate with the most votes in a constituency wins the seats. However, this system is highly disproportionate in both terms of the word as it exaggerates winning votes for example, the Conservatives received 36.1% of the vote and won 47.1% of the seats in the 2010 general election, whereas it penalises small parties such as the Liberal Democrats who won 23% of the vote but gained only 8.8% of the seats. Particularly as FPTP produces landslide majorities, it makes Parliament less effective as the party that wins the general election forms the government and therefore has a large majority in most cases. If MPs belonging to the party vote along party lines all the time, in theory Parliament is rather ineffective when it comes to making decisions as well as scrutinising the government in an attempt to hold it to account. However, I feel if the electoral system changed to one which was more proportionally representative in terms of the votes to seats ratio, such as the Supplementary Voting System which was used in the London Mayoral elections when Boris Johnson was elected, Parliament would be more effective, and the electorates wishes would carried out more effectively because the vote to seat ratio would be much closer. Therefore the electorate would be better equipped to scrutinise the government because there would be less of such a large majority, this would also reduce executive dominance, which I feel is key in strengthening Parliaments effectiveness. Also, electoral reform would increase the likelihood of government coalitions, such as the Con-LibDem coalition which currently governs the UK, especially including smaller parties if the general election results are close. This would result in a stronger Parliament, a weaker executive and the government’s mandate would not be questioned. I also feel that the commons does not resemble society, which adds to its ineffectiveness. Critics point out that the House of Commons cannot hope to properly represent society whilst the majority of its members continue to be white, upper class men. Over 40% of current MP’s attended fee-paying schools, even though public schools educate just 7% of the population and I feel Parliament cannot be wholly effective if the commons do not reflect society, however, supporters claim that the 650 MP’s are the best people to effectively carry out the job.
Another way in which Parliament could be made more effective is by reforming Question time. Question Time occurs Monday to Thursday and is when ministers of the ruling party answer questions from the opposition and other MP's. The Prime Minister is also required to attend a single session a week lasting at least half an hour in which he must answer questions. This measure is partly effective because other MP's can directly confront ministers from the ruling party on the policies or decisions they have made. Question time can help to expose weaknesses within ruling parties. Backbenchers are also invited to question time, giving everyone the chance to hold the government accountable. However, Question time has been criticised as being only mildly effective because all questions that are to be asked have to be sent in a week in advance if the MP is to answer it. This allows the ministers to prepare their answers in advance, which means they could prepare answers that avoid the main point. Also the party whips give MP's of the ruling party questions to ask that do not really serve a purpose i.e. Why do you think your policy worked well? This demeans the whole point of question time. I feel question time, specifically PMQ’s should be extended to more than 30 minutes in order for the government to be properly held to account, which in turn would make Parliament more effective.

A third reform which would make Parliament more effective would be a reform to the House of Lords. Currently there are 787 Lords all of whom are unelected, 90 are hereditary peers and 25 are bishops. The House of Lords should become more legitimate via the removal of certain peers e.g. the 90 hereditary Peers removed and also by removing the 25 bishops who sit in the Lords. The UK is multicultural country and so the Lords should not have 25 unelected bishops, this does not at all represent society. I also feel that the House of Lords should have a complete overhaul and, like the Commons, should be elected. This would make the peers in the House of Lords more effective because as elected peers, they would have a mandate from the electorate, they would also be more effective within their role, particularly when it comes to scrutinising government policy. The Lords are, however, quite effective in their present state as they are able to freely block and scrutinise bills proposed by parliament, apart from economic bills, which is how parliament got the recent NHS bill through the lords. However, the House of Lords should not be entirely abolished, as if the Lords were abolished, all of its current workload would be shifted to the Commons, where MP’s already complain of being overworked.
The EU makes legislation mostly concerning the economy and trade, however, it is a huge threat to parliament and makes it hugely ineffective. Parliament is supposed to be sovereign yet, EU law takes precedent and the European Court of Justice is the highest court in the UK legal system. Laws made by Parliament can be overruled by the European Union and so this makes Parliament hugely inefficient and stops parliament representing the views of the electorate. An example of this is when Karen Murphy was fined £8000 by a British court for showing Premier League football matches in her pub whilst breaching copyright, But the European court backed Mrs Murphy and said the Premier League’s stance was ‘contrary to EU law’ on the freedom of trade. A reform would be for the UK to exercise opt-outs more frequently, however the only way to fully stop the EU undermining Parliament is to leave the union.
Another reform which would make Parliament more effective would be to introduce an entrenched Bill of Rights and or Human Rights Act. Currently in the UK, the Bill of Rights and HRA are not entrenched, meaning that it is fairly easy for the executive to bypass Parliament. However, if the UK Bill of Rights or HRA became entrenched, it would mean that the actions of the government would be stipulated in such a way that they would be unable to breach the bill, it would also make government more accountable for their actions; meaning Parliament could be more effective when holding the government to account as well as effective scrutiny. Another reform of is to have a stronger separation of powers as part of codified constitution. Whilst a codified constitution would limit government, perhaps in a similar way to which an entrenched Human Rights Act would, I feel that having a real separation of powers would make Parliament more effective as there would be better scrutiny with both houses being both separate and independent with equal powers. A separation of powers is similar to the US government as the House of Representatives and the senate are independent, have equal powers and are elected. However, a problem with this would be legislative gridlock, which is common is the US and policies can’t be agreed on. This would mean having no one person in more than one pillar of the three within the institution and instead being entirely separate, so someone such as the Lord Chancellor wouldn’t be a part of all three pillars. This would make Parliament more effective as they wouldn’t have conflicting interests when part of either the executive or the legislature.
Another way to make parliament more effective is to create more powerful select Committees. Whilst the Conservatives created more Select Committees in 1979 and New Labour gave more funding for Select Committees to conduct more extensive research into proposals such as the Terror Bill, I feel that Select Committees are still flawed. Instead, when scrutinising, Select Committees should have more specialist advice, and more summoning power to force government ministers and other people regarding the proposals and to call them to account. In the past, ministers such as Edwina Currie have refused to answer questions regarding proposals. Likewise, Select Committees should have more power, which the Powers Report also suggested, to act against these people who do not turn up or refuse to answer questions and instead be able to effectively call them to account. Also, after Select Committees produce a report, the Committees should be able to exert more pressure on Government to act on these reports, and gain a response from government sooner, rather than within 60 days as is the current rule. These reforms regarding Select Committees would make Parliament more effective as they would be stronger at scrutinising government policy if they had more power.
I also feel it is important to reform the whips, the MPs who have influence and pressure on other MPs by saying how to vote on proposals in some cases. Although whips can be seen to make Parliament efficient, by telling MP’s which way they must vote, they irradiate the views of the electorate and destroy democracy, thus making parliament ineffective. Reducing the power whips have would make Parliament more effective as there would be less sycophant MPs voting along party lines if there is less influence from the Whips who also encourage bias thinking. The whips now have no influence when stating who should be appointed to be a part of a Select Committee, backbenchers now chooses who to appoint. Likewise, other committees such as Standing Committees should be given more time to scrutinise legislation clauses which would make Parliament more effective, as if more time was given, it would be better to see the flaws within the legislation which could be changed therefore strengthening the legislation in the long term, particularly when being used, this would also tighten up ineffective loopholes within legislation. Members of a Standing Committees should become more permanent as it would mean they would be more experienced on matters specific to the committee and therefore more effective when scrutinising legislation and new proposals.
On the other hand, although reform is necessary in order to make Parliament more effective, I feel it is important to not destroy important traditions which are part of the institution that is Parliament.

To conclude, I feel there are many reforms that could be implemented to make Parliament more effective, such as reforming the House of Lords, irradiating Whips, giving more power to select committees and making parliament more representative. However, I feel the most important reform is to change the electoral system, as the current system does not clearly represent the electorate’s wishes and so makes parliament ineffective. However, a referendum held in 2010 resulted in the electorate choosing to keep First-Past-The-Post over The Alternative Vote, and so this is unlikely anytime soon, as the current system overwhelmingly benefits the two parties.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

As Politics Unit 2 Edexcel

...Parliament Source Questions (6/10) Specification a) Describe three functions of Parliament b) With reference to the source, and your own knowledge, explain why government needs an effective Parliament c) Analyse the main factors that limit the effectiveness of Parliament Jan 2010 a) With reference to source, what changes to the second chamber are proposed? b) With reference to the source, and your own knowledge, explain the arguments for a fully or partly elected chamber c) Make out a case against an elected second chamber Jan 2011 a) With reference to the source, describe two functions of the House of Commons b) With reference to the source, and your own knowledge, explain how the House of Commons can control the power of government c) To what extent is the House of Commons effective in carrying out its various functions? May 2011 a) With reference to the source, describe three proposals that seek to strengthen parliamentary representation by increasing popular participation b) With reference to the source, and your own knowledge, explain how three of these proposals seek to make government more accountable to Parliament c) To what extent will the coalition government’s proposals bring about an effective reform of Parliament? Jan 2012 a) With reference to the source, why are legislative committees needed? b) With reference to the source, and your own knowledge, explain the ways in which backbench MPs can call government to account c) To what extent has......

Words: 1305 - Pages: 6

Free Essay


...As a result public unhappiness towards the improportionate Parliament during the 1980s, the Royal Commission came up with ten criteria to assess the best system and suggested a change to the MMP system. The few most important criteria are the fairness between political parties, effectiveness of parties and Parliament and even the political integration (Elections New Zealand, 2012). These criteria are not met in a FPP system as it tends to create a single-majority party in the parliament. The fairness between parties is defined as the proportionality between the total party votes and number of seats, gained by any parties (Elections New Zealand, 2012). The effectiveness of parties has the definition that the parties should always play their roles to create a more efficient and democratic country and to provide a more effective representation for the society of New Zealand (Elections New Zealand, 2012). In addition, the best voting system always provides an improved parliamentary role such as passing policies, enacting legislation and provide better services which is defining the effectiveness of Parliament. The political integration, then, outlined the opinions and points of view of all groups and parties should all be respected and adopted (Elections New Zealand, 2012). By assessing all the criteria above, the best voting system must be the one system that best meets them. Although it is obvious that the MMP system is the best possible system as New Zealand had decided to......

Words: 1662 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Should Fptp Continue to Be Used for Elections to the House of Commons?

...Should FPTP continue to be used for elections to the House of Commons? The first reason that FPTP should continue to be used for elections to the House of Commons is that it produces effective constituency representation because there are single member constituencies, meaning that people know which MP represents them in the House of Commons, and thus who they can take their grievances to. This is a strength because it results in a strong working link between an MP and a geographical area, thus connecting communities to central politics. For example, Greg Barker, the Conservative MP for Bexhill and Battle, has worked with his constituents, since he won 51.6% of the vote and was thus elected to the House of Commons in 2010, to represent their need in Parliament. For instance, in September 2014, Barker advocated for the expansion of free childcare for 2,200 two-year-olds in East Sussex, as a result of the 2006 childcare act. Moreover, due to the fact that under FPTP only one MP is elected per constituency, the public can easily hold their representative directly accountable for their actions, and consequently can vote them out of power at the next general election. For example, the labour MP for Bethnal Green and Bow, Oona King, lost her seat in the 2010 general election, when her predominantly Muslim constituents voted her out of power, after her support for the Iraq war. Consequently, since under PR systems the link between constituents and representatives is significantly......

Words: 1394 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Ethics of Offshoring: Novo Nordisk and Clinical Trials in Emerging Economies better standards for working conditions, proper safety measures, and high economic and ethical concern. The case Ethics of Offshoring: Novo Nordisk and Clinical Trials in Emerging Economies was a highly informative case on clinical trials and offshoring. There was a reporter who wanted to speak with Anders Dejgaard, chief medical officer of Novo Nordisk, about his take on the offshoring of clinical trials by Danish companies as there had been multiple reports about trials being conducted in developing countries under unethical conditions. When reading the case, it truly made me consider aspects that I had never considered before. There are a few underlying questions that I feel need to be discussed. First of all, when considering both economic and ethical aspects, is it appropriate for companies like Novo Nordisk to conduct clinical trials in, for example India? What exactly are the principles that should guide such a decision? According to amednews, “The average American income is $47,000 a year -- 16 times what the average Indian takes home, according to the CIA World Factbook. There is one doctor for every 384 Americans, while there are 1,667 patients for each Indian...

Words: 1572 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Are Pressure Groups Good for Democracy?

...groups are political associations that are filled with liked minded individuals who aim to promote and protect the interest of a section of the community, or promote a particular cause in order to influence the government and their decisions. Examples of pressure groups include the country side alliance which preserve to protect the country side, others include the anti abortion organisation Life which seeks to prevent the bill that allowed the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990. Pressure groups like this create things such as petitions,in fact Life had over 2 million names and they would also compile post card campaigns. These are few methods, demonstrations, marches and sit ins in popular areas such as outside parliament are also very popular and effective as it causes disruption and demands media attention. Pressure groups can be seen as good for democracy in many ways. Democracy is the idea of enhancing the view of the people and trying to get them to engage Into political participation through methods such as voting at elections. Pressure groups allow greater education from a different perspective, informing and educating the public about important issues. This may be things like fracking and the pressure group Greenpeace who educate through the media on the issue and what the negatives are which the government do not want to say in order to have a certain amount of consent from the electorate.  In addition to this it acts as a good way of allowing people to......

Words: 1152 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

The House of Lords Is Now More Effective Than the House of Commons in Checking Government Power. Discuss

...House of Lords is now more effective than the House of Commons in checking government power'. Discuss In theory the House of Commons is the dominant chamber as it is elected while the House of Lords plays more of a revising role, issues to be considered include the powers of each chambers, the fact the House of Lords is more independently minded and the impact of the whips. It will ultimately be argued that the House of Commons remains far more effective due to having greater powers in checking the government power. Firstly, the House of Commons has the ultimate check on government power via a vote of no confidence, this last happened in 1979 when Margaret Thatcher was able to be elected due to the Labour government's failure. The vote of no confidence allows the House of Commons to directly confront the government which creates a mutual respect between the government and the House of Commons as they can get rid of a government if they believe the government is failing to use its power correctly and effectively. Also, only the House of Commons has the power to reject legislation compared to the House of Lords which can only suspend the legislation for a maximum of 2 years. For example, in 2001 the House of Lords voted 317-68 against a fox hunting ban, and in 2004 they again threw out the plans for a complete ban, however in November 2004 the parliamentary act was invoked and the bill came into force in 2005. However, the fact the House of Lords is more independently......

Words: 1305 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Budget Policy

...government proposes to do and what objectives it pursues. It presents the government's financial plans for an upcoming period and is a comprehensive statement of the priorities of the nation. Which sectors of the economy will be expected to pay for said activities; how government will respond to economic disturbances in the short term; and who will be the direct and indirect beneficiaries of public services? The budget is about people and should respond to their needs. It is a way of determining how the Government seeks to fulfill goals for the welfare of people as set out in a country's Constitution/Bill of Rights, in international instruments and standards (e.g. MDGs), and in government policy statements. THE FUNCTIONS OF THE BUDGET The National Budget allocates resources, distributes wealth and income, and stabilizes the economy. The economic stabilisation function of the budget should be balanced against the need to ensure that there are adequate resources (including from external sources) to guarantee the delivery and development of essential services especially in the social sectors. The three objectives of budgeting The first objective of budgeting is affordability. A budget must be affordable; parliament must ensure that the total amount of spending affordable and it must control expenditure. The second objective is prioritization; setting priorities and allocating adequate resources, this is the allocate level of spending. The third...

Words: 1927 - Pages: 8

Free Essay


...Politics Unit 2 * Constitution * Codified Constitution ✓ * Advantages & Disadvantages * Features * Uncodified Constitution ✓ * Advantages & Disadvantages * Features * Is Parliament Sovereign? ✓ * Arguments For and Against * Strengths and Weaknesses of the UK’s constitution ✓ * Constitutional Reforms – Coalition and 1997-2010 ✓ * What are they? * Are they effective? * PM & Cabinet * Features & Functions of the PM ✓ * What must a politician be to becoming PM * What can a PM do? * Functions of Cabinet ✓ * Factors that affect promotion and resignation of a minister ✓ * Powers and Constraints of PM ✓ * Theories of Executive Power ✓ * PM V Cabinet ✓ * Parliament * Functions of Parliament ✓ * What are they? * How effective are they? * Powers of Parliament ✓ * What are they? * How effective are they? * Parliamentary Reform ✓ * What are they? * How effective are they? * Relationship between Parliament and Government ✓ * Factors that affect it * How the coalition affects it Constitution: 2 Types of Constitution * Codified & Uncodified Codified Constitution * Constitution where the rules are written down in a single document. Example could be the USA. Creates a......

Words: 4289 - Pages: 18

Premium Essay

British Civil War

...Was finance the most important reason for the deteriation of Charles 1 and parliament? Finance was an important reason in why the relationship between Charles 1 and parliament deteriorated. This is in source A where it states the king was trying to make England a successful country yet without success. Source A also suggests that Charles 1 was unaware of what he was doing and as a result made himself an unpopular and feeble king. Source A continues to show signs of negativity towards Charles for example, his unexplained reasons for making such drastic changes to his subject’s everyday life. The evidence to suggest this is shown through source A’s quotes ‘reversed the practice of several decades’ and ‘reasons for the crowns pressing financial requirements were not spelt out’. Source A portrays Charles 1 as an unfit king for his public and parliament. It also demonstrates that parliament that parliament were not satisfied with the kings changes to society simply because Charles didn’t give any stable reasons for requesting them. Source B doesn’t mention finance at all. Therefore it does not imply any importance of finance. There are also no quotes in source B to suggest finance was significant however it highlights politics, religion and foreign policy as more of an issue. Source B evidenced this through the quotes ‘legal, constitutional and religious issues’ and ‘Charles’ behaviour tended to divide rather than unite the political elite. These quotes demonstrate that finance...

Words: 1810 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Benjamin Franklin Leadership Style

...1 Anthony Tucker Jr. MANG 4424-M477 Professor Wilson 24 March 2013 2 Leader Profile of Ben Franklin 3 Outline Introduction Benjamin Franklin is a renowned American known for his keen business skills and leadership. Franklin was trained by his older brother James how to run the printing business. Having learned the skill he moved to Philadelphia to become his own man. Thesis Franklin’s success in business and other disciplines are of exceptional interest to the entire world because of his initiative. 1. Background Franklin always wanted to write his own stories after having learned how to read and write at an early age. He wrote compelling letters that made him popular in Boston. His brother James was jealous of the development and often scolded him. He decided to move to Philadelphia where he started his own printing business. 2. Accomplishments and Failures The printer business thrived and grew to an empire while he pursued interests in science. He made significant scientific inventions that made a great significant in the world. He had low moments in his career due to his stance on issues pertaining to justice. 3. Leadership Strengths and Weaknesses He displayed exceptional leadership traits that enabled him to achieve much in his career. He managed to lead people and motivate them to take part in some of his ventures (Northouse 21). 4. Points of View on Benjamin Franklin Franklin’s self discipline is an influential......

Words: 1690 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Intro to Politics and Law

...Liberal and Labor parties have had to change for them to survive.” Discuss critically Length 500-700 words The objective of this assessment This assessment requires you to write an essay on Australian political parties based primarily on Willmot and Dowse’s chapter on pages 181 to 206 of the Course Reader. You can also read Dean Jaensch’s chapter (attached) and other sources, such as those referred to in lectures. You may wish to find books in the Reid Library (3rd floor) on your question. See me by October 24 to discuss how your research and writing is progressing. With this essay you should write critically and analytically, rather than descriptively. If you are claiming, for example, that the Liberal party is a conservative party, you will need to support your argument with evidence and your points must be properly referenced. Your essay will need to have an introduction, a body and a conclusion. The grade you receive will depend on how much effort you have put into researching and writing your essay. Essays written the night before they are due usually look rushed and are riddled with clumsy sentences and factual errors. Essay markers can spot them straight away. Please ensure you give yourself enough time to work on the essay. If you require an extension of time, you need to apply for an extension and provide a good reason (such as a medical certificate)....

Words: 1690 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

House of Lords

...The House of Lords an effective institution? an effective institution? Introduction Since the reform of the House of Lords in 1999 by Tony Blair’s ‘New Labour’ government, the status and legislative scope of the ‘upper house’ has steadily risen. Its role as a ‘revising chamber’, scrutinising bills sent to it from the House of Commons, is an important one. However, unlike upper houses in many modern democracies such as the Senate in the USA, theoretically it cannot stop, and at best can only delay, legislation sent from the Commons. As a largely appointed chamber, doubts remain as to its legitimacy and as recently as 2012 the government tried to replace the Lords with a largely elected chamber. This initiative however failed, perhaps partly because MPs were worried that a wholly elected Lords might in the future question the primacy of the Commons. Task Objective * This task requires you to explore the workings of the Lords and consider how effective it is as a parliamentary body. * It will ask you to consider whether the House of Lords should be reformed further. * It will guide you through a range of reading material and pose key questions for you to post on as you complete each section of reading. Task 1: Overview of Functions____________________________________________________________________ You can get a very quick overview of the role and work of the House of Lords by skim reading the following pamphlet and watching the YouTube......

Words: 4252 - Pages: 18

Free Essay


...1. Explain why an organisation needs to collect and record HR data. Reasons why organisations collect data To meet legal requirements: • Checking that each employee is eligible to work in the UK • Ensuring that the Company is complying with any governing body e.g. FCA • Making sure that processes such as grievances, disciplinary, maternity etc. are performed in the correct manner. To help make informed decisions: • Understanding whether the company needs to expand and what skills they will need • Looking at where redundancies might be made • Using benchmarking to make sure that employees are paid at a competitive rate To identify areas of growth: • Looking at demographics and understanding where products sell best • Understanding what skills are needed to hit the target market and what skills current employees need to improve to increase productivity 2. Identify the range of HR data that organisations collect and how this supports HR practice. Range of HR data that organisations collect Exit Interviews Exit interviews enable HR to understand why an employee is leaving the Company. The HR department are then able to analyse the data and implement necessary changes i.e. it might be that the manager of that area needs additional management training or that Company are not paying competitively and a benchmarking exercise would be useful. By looking at this data the organisation can limit the number of employees......

Words: 1048 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Are Leaders Born or Made

...| “Are Good Leaders born, or can they be Made” | For decades researchers have been trying to find the answer to the question “Are good Leaders born, or can they be made?” However it is my belief that, it is a little of both, Leaders are naturally born and they can be made. Firstly, let us define who is a leader, Peter Guy Northouse – (2009) postulates that “a leader is any person who guides others towards a common goal, showing the way by example, thus creating an environment in which other team members feel actively involved in the entire process of goal achievement. A leader is not the boss of the team but instead, he/she is that person who is committed to carrying out the mission of the venture. He further defines leadership as” a process of social influence in which one person can enlist the aid and support of others in the accomplishment of a common task” which in short would mean working through others to achieve goals or objectives . With these definitions, it would be safe to say that anyone whose accomplishment necessitates the sustenance of others can be a leader. The same is true of many who are presently working with and through others to achieve a common objective that they are indeed leaders, whether they consider themselves to be eccentric or catastrophic leaders. Mahatma Gandhi once said that, “We must live the change we want to see”. This quote brings new meaning as it embraces the fact that we are leaders of any change in our lives, therefore......

Words: 1631 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Tranparency in Governance Is the Ultimate Key to Reforms

...religion, caste, etc. In such diverse environments, it is vital to have an effective and tolerant government and sustain development. Indians are well aware of good governance but are curtailed by these innumerable barriers. The closed approach caused by these barriers is the root cause for corruption in the country. India ranks very low in the Transparency index and is known for high levels of corruption. BARRIERS Slowdown in the growth of GDP , a virtual stagnation in industrial production, and the risk of loosing the investments grade rating by international rating agencies like Standard and Poor’s has rattled the government and industry. The policy makers are favoring the introduction of FDI in service sectors like retail, insurance as a means to reverse the slowdown in the economy. But sustained growth is possible only if there is a healthy manufacturing sector. In the last years India has hardly invested in the physical infrastructure which has hampered the development of manufacturing sector increasing the costs of transportation. India’s overdependence on the service sector and slow growth in manufacturing has been the reason for deceleration in the pace of economy. The presence of corruption and bad governance has made the situation worse. Given the high levels of corruption and bad governance has affected the quality and quality of investment and hence might not be able to make India more competitive. Major scams have broken out in resource sectors like,......

Words: 1299 - Pages: 6