Free Essay

How Can We Explain the Great Terror?

In: Historical Events

Submitted By Omegasaurus
Words 3512
Pages 15
History 2084
Russia in War and Revolution
How Can We Explain the Great Terror? The Great Terror, the watershed between Marxist-Leninism and true Stalinism, is usually defined as the period of almost indiscriminate repression spanning from the Moscow show trials of 1936-37 to the end of Yezhovchina in 1939. During the Terror hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of Russian persons were arrested, detained, deported and/or executed on the strength of orders filtered down from above, with Joseph Stalin at the apex signing the executive command. Given the cult of personality, as well as the particular style of administrative bureaucracy, that had been fostered through the decades since the revolution it would not be unreasonable to conclude superficially that Stalin had orchestrated some grand, Machiavellian operation for the inculcation of his position at the head of the Communist hierarchy. However, to do so seems incongruous with the portrait of incompetence painted by his contemporaries (the Ryutin Platform and the general indictment by Lenin[1] springing immediately to mind) and the seemingly ad hoc nature of his policy decisions[2] (specifically, his situational swings between conservatism and radicalism in the 1920's that seemed to consider the ramifications of those policies as a secondary consideration to the quelling of political dissent[3]). While it seems probable that he was apt to consolidate his influence within the Party at any opportunity, the picture of Stalin-as-Cartoon-Villain interpretation tends to dehumanise the figure of Stalin to an extent that then obfuscates the culpability of all else involved (from the uncaring to the “over zealous[4]”). Stalin demonstrated gross personality flaws in his administration[5] and personally perpetrated various crimes against humanity[6], but it is hard to conclude that any of the other contenders for Party superiority would have proved more able to control the wildly veering Line as it struggled to adapt itself against the idiosyncratic and backward nature of Russian society. By the time the Great Purges occurred, Soviet Russia and Marxist ideology had passed well through the haze of fanaticism that had coloured the post-revolutionary days. It had become something much more akin to the Salem witch trials or the Inquisition, in that the subjective guilt of the individual (of being an anti-societal element, i.e., a lawbreaker) had been subsumed by the extrinsically imposed objective guilt of the whole (of being unable to answer adequately for the failures of the system). Staunch, explicit support for the Party was demonstrated as being insufficient to disprove subversive intent regardless of political or social standing during the Show Trials and thanks to the 1937 expansion of Article 58 of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (RSFSR) Penal Code a mere accusation thereof came to imply sufficient guilt for conviction. A citizen of Stalinist Russia (whether peasant or party member) would have been pressed by an ever increasingly onerous burden to prove their complicity to the doctrine regardless of personal belief. Although that citizen may not have fundamentally believed in the strength of that doctrine, such a matter is trifling when one considers that due to the incriminating implication of second-guessing the intentions of what may well be a devout believer it becomes impossible to accurately assess the stance of any given neighbour. Without the ability to ascertain that information safely, the only solution that remains feasible is that of tactical denunciation; 'proving' to the world in general that one is not a conspirator by process of accusing others. There have been many explanations for the events of the Great Terror[7] and it is likely that there is a measure of accuracy to a number of them. It is the contention of this essay that the rushed and ill-administered nature of the Bolshevik revolution is fundamentally responsible, as it created a severe paranoiac zeitgeist that was geometrically self-propagating, becoming increasingly destructive with each iteration until the mechanisms developed to assist the ideological construct essentially devoured its progenitors. This will be demonstrated through an examination of several major events between the Civil War and the Moscow Show Trials and their effects on the socio-political milieux of the period, including: the formal criminalisation of political opposition to the Bolshevik party in 1921, the introduction in 1927 of the all-encompassing Article 58 of the the R.S.F.S.R. Penal Code and its subsequent expansion after 1934 and the forced Industrialisation and Collectivisation under the first Five Year Plan from 1929 to 1933, not only for the repressed peasants but for the administrative organs responsible for its implementation. The Proliferation of Guilt: Civil War to Collectivisation The transformation of an agrarian oligarchy into an industrial commune was never going to be performed without some measure of repression by the ruling class of the proposed intermediary dictatorship[8]. To the utilitarian, scientific minds of those observing the 'Objective Logic' of history[9] this was simply an undesirable (yet brief) inevitability as the bourgeois remnants of the past clung desperately to whatever vestiges of power they had held illegitimately in the old world[10]. As a corollary bonus, the idea of a struggle against counter-revolutionary elements seemed a viable path through which the strength of Party unity could be galvanised. As the war dragged on, however, it eventually became apparent not only that not only were the deleterious effects of a protracted civil war destroying any capability that Russia may once have had to push itself through further industrialisation, but also suggesting a fundamental flaw in the apparently sound rationalist theory behind it. After five years of heavy infighting the Bolsheviks were able to prove only that the country was still not ready to relieve the temporary dictatorship; a prospect that necessarily carried with it one of three connotations. Either Marxism itself was flawed, the Russian socio-political sphere was far too immature to carry it through, or there were ever more crafty counter-revolutionary elements subverting the march of progress. The response from the S.R.s and Mensheviks to Lenin's 'strategic retreat' into the N.E.P. gave what appears to have been a suitable answer: the allowance of factional antagonistic political parties was an artefact of the past and evidently detrimental to the revolution. At the Xth Party Congress in 1921 Karl Radek vocalised the ultimatum that either they must be allowed full rights of political influence or be destroyed. By 1922 they had been dissolved completely[11], and the first major step toward totalitarianism had been taken[12]. The twenties progressed and the party was purged multiple times amongst further redefinitions of anti-Bolshevism, exacerbated by intra-party factionalism and denunciations thereof[13]. With a purge comes an intrinsic implication of incompatibility with the party, and members removed as such became susceptible to the repression building against the populace. This was exemplified by the introduction of Article 58 to the RSFSR Penal Code in February 1927. It was enacted as an attempt to codify what was to be defined as counter-revolutionary, as well as the punitive measures to be taken against such activity. Given the nature of the revolutionary struggle, granted to have been against every foreign nation and previously applicable political ideology, the article was in fact so broadly written that very quickly there came to be almost no class of action or inaction that couldn't be punished in accordance with it[14]. Of particular note were the provisions related to 'wrecking' (and with its expansion on June 6 1937, 'sabotage'); where the expulsion of factional Communist parties had proposed to destroy explicit opposition to Bolshevik policy, these particular provisions acted against what could be classed as 'implicit' opposition. The act of 'wrecking' could apply itself to any positive act, even within one's duties as a citizen, that could be implied as being detrimental to the state[15]. It didn't matter if the act was made in good faith, as a testimony of innocence would simply undermine the authority of the investigating organ of state and would by definition have been punishable as 'wrecking'. In light of this methodology of incrimination, it is understandable that any non-party members would have found themselves increasingly wary not only of the apparatus of state, but of the actions they made and the actions of the people around them. A strange feedback loop developed, as the appearance of guilt over the denunciation of a neighbour became evidence of guilt in relation to that neighbour's crime. As more people disappeared into the hands of the NKVD, the accusations of conspiratorial design increased and in turn, so did the number of arrests. Even within the administration and political police themselves, a failure to attain confessions, arrests and denunciations was looked on as evidence of corruption and counter-revolutionary sympathy to the extent that interrogators occasionally admitted to their prisoners the necessity of falsification for the sake of the state[16]. By 1936 belief in an accusation had long since become irrelevant- “if you live with the wolves, you must howl with the wolves.”[17] This moral panic rose from the bottom to find only paralysis and confusion at the top. The rising number of prisoners in the labour camps was not translating to the economic benefits some postulated may have spurred the crackdowns[18], and factional disputes were seething beneath the façade of Party solidarity[19]. While Zinoviev and Kamenev called for the expulsion of Trotsky on the Left, Stalin spoke publicly of moderation between them while privately destroying Trotsky's base of support. When it was possible to remove Trotsky from the War Commissariat, Stalin turned the Right against Zinoviev and Kamenev for the Leningrad Party's opposition to the Moscow Party, claiming that they were conspiring for the destruction of Bukharin and the will of the majority. Their defeat left them to form a Leftist bloc with Trotsky, whose political and economic policies were wildly radical and included the proposal to force a process of collectivisation on the peasants and working class in order to jump start the economic conditions needed for Socialism to proceed. Their expulsion from the Politburo on 1926 foreshadowed their expulsion from the Party in 1927, opening the path for Stalinist ministers to replace them. With the left domesticated, Stalin almost immediately turned his machinations against the Right[20], undermining the positions of Bukharin, Rykov and Tomsky as he began adopting the previously radical economic policies that they opposed (those which eventually led to Collectivisation). When they attempted to resign in late 1928 Stalin made sufficient concessions to keep them where they were, creating a forced unanimity that outwardly resembled Party unity. When Bukharin's protest of this came to light, Right-wing support plummeted amidst accusations of treachery and slander removing Bukharin as Chairman of the Comintern and Tomsky from the trade union leadership. The Right was forced to rescind their previous objections to the adoption of rapid collectivisation and industrialisation at the XVIth Party Conference in April 1929. Very shortly thereafter Vyacheslav Molotov, acting on orders from Stalin, announced radical amendments to these policies intended to see a much swifter achievement of their ends. With no functional political opposition remaining, the Central Committee issued a decision in January 1930 decreeing an increase from the targeted collectivisation of the private sector of agriculture from twenty per cent by 1933 to one hundred per cent by 1932 at the latest. Mutually Assured Economic Destruction: Collectivisation and Dekulakisation From an outside perspective, the first Five Year Plan for collectivisation was an astonishing success. By March 1930, more than fifty per cent was taken from the peasants within six months[21] and over ninety per cent was completed by the end of 1932. From the perspective of agricultural production, economic repercussion and public support, it was completely catastrophic. From the beginning the majority of peasants had objected to the forced removal of their land and property, a great number protesting via the destruction of anything they could not immediately use simply to avoid it falling into the hands of the government[22]. The plan to export confiscated grain to fund the promotion of industrial agricultural technology and methods was a fairy tale, the tractors promised to the poorly administered collective farms often simply failing to materialise. In December 1929 Stalin declared the 'liquidation of the kulaks as a class'[23], partially as a response to the protests mounting against forced crash collectivisation (although partially in line with the Communist Party's classic distaste for what they observed as the petite bourgeois nature of a peasant that was not dependant on the state). With no further classification of exactly what was a 'kulak' other than 'a rich peasant', this created yet another scapegoat to add to the mounting pile- interestingly, for once one that actually was acting in opposition to the desired Communist policy. Naturally, the systematic persecution of the kulaks (an event that actually far out performed the Great Terror in terms of deaths, arrests, deportations and gross human rights violations[24]) came at the worst possible time: the harvests of the early thirties were performed under terrible drought conditions, yet no concession was made to prevent the consequential famine that shook the country. Very quickly it was determined that the kulaks were responsible for the massive grain shortages, having hoarded it away to vex the process and frustrate the Communists. These claims, of course, had very little grounding in reality. The practical process of determining exactly which peasants were richer than the rest became little more than another farcical method of repression, this time squeezing down on the vast majority of the Russian population. Even the administrative organs responsible for the enforcement and requisition aiming to please their masters through over-productivity weren't safe: after seeing the effect of the Plan on the countryside even Stalin baulked, issuing an announcement in March 1930 in which he blamed the drastic social ramifications of the slaughter and theft in the countryside on “over-zealous” Party members, influenced by and complicit with dangerous anti-Leninist agents[25]. The stage was set for the Great Terror- literally the entire country lived in constant fear of the Sword of Damocles of arbitrary repression, the elite that may have resisted Stalin's irrational whims had been bullied and confused into passivity, even those loyal to the core were functionally treated as counter-revolutionary saboteurs. All that was left was for Stalin to follow his paranoid delusion to its logical extreme in having a popular political ally assassinated in the wake of a scathing indictment of his character by a relative nobody. Conclusion As a policy of negativity, the introduction of a new class of political criminals has two interesting effects that should be addressed. The first is that the uncertain ruling party (and by extension their public support) attempts to further define who or what they are; a style of fumbling in the dark, wherein they are able to create an aggregate image of themselves by the association of their enemies. If one is unable to point to what a Bolshevik is, then one should at least be able to point to what a Bolshevik isn't. However, in deciding that a class of people is inherently incompatible with the ruling party ethos there comes a broad expansion of the penumbra of guilt surrounding the apparently solid core of the Party. Because the policy itself secondarily highlights the unsubstantiality of that core, faith in the Party solidifies temporarily but inevitably collapses further when the problems intended to be addressed by the expansion are not solved. The process repeats itself until there is only a single grain of what is definite, surrounded by the vast shadow of what is definitely not. The ever expanding field of guilt that eventually came to singularity with the Great Terror can be simply explained as an attempt by those that believed in the looming ghost of Communism to retain its presence, for society to take on the guilt of the ideology's failures to save it from shattering in the face of its own insubstantiality[26]. In essence, the Great Terror was Russia's attempt to avoid admitting that it was unable to ever achieve Realsocialisme.

Bibliography Primary Sources
Lenin, V.I., “First Congress of the Communist International”, Collected Works, Vol 28 (Lenin Internet Archive (marxists.org), 2000) accessed May 28, 2011, http://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1919/mar/comintern.htm
Lenin, V.I., “The State and Revolution”, Collected Works, Vol 25 (Lenin Internet Archive (marxists.org), 1993), accessed May 28, 2011, http://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1917/staterev/ch02.htm#s3.
Miller, A.V., trans., Hegel's Science of Logic, (George Allen & Unwin, 1969), accessed May 28, 2011, http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/works/hl/hlnotion.htm#HL3_577b
Stalin, J.V., “Dizzy with Success”, Pravda, No. 60, (March 2, 1930), (Marxists Internet Archive (marxists.org), 2008), accessed May 28, 2011, http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1930/03/02.htm
Stalin, J.V.,“Concerning Questions of Agrarian Policy in the U.S.S.R.”, Pravda, No. 309 (Marxists Internet Archive (marxists.org), 2008), accessed May 28, 2011, http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1929/12/27.htm Secondary Sources
Applebaum, Anne, Gulag: A History (London: The Penguin Press, 2003)
Birt, Raymond “Personality and Foreign Policy: The Case of Stalin”, Political Psychology, Vol. 14, No. 4 (Dec., 1993)
Carmichael, Joel, Stalin's Masterpiece, (London: Morrison & Gibb Ltd, 1976)
Conquest, Robert, The Great Terror (London: Macmillan and Co Ltd., 1968)
Davies, Sarah, Harris, James, Stalin: A New History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1964)
Figes, Orlando, A People's Tragedy (London: Penguin, 1997)
Getty, J.A., Ritterspoon, G.T., Zemskov, V.N., “Victims of the Soviet Penal System in the Pre-war Years”, American Historical Review, Vol. 98, No. 4 (October 1993)
Hochschild, Adam The Unquiet Ghost: Russians Remember Stalin, (New York: Penguin Books USA Inc., 1994)
Solzhenitsyn, Aleksandr, The Gulag Archipelago (New York: Harper & Row)
Zizek, Slavoj, Chapter 2, “Why is Woman a Symptom of Man?”, Enjoy Your Symptom! (New York: Routledge Classics, 2008)
-----------------------
[1] Robert Conquest, The Great Terror (London: Macmillan and Co Ltd., 1968) pp. 536-7
[2] Sarah Davies, James Harris, Stalin: A New History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1964), pp.4-5.
[3] Ibid., pp. 8-13.
[4] J.V. Stalin, “Dizzy with Success”, Pravda, No. 60, (March 2, 1930), (Marxists Internet Archive (marxists.org), 2008), accessed May 28, 2011, http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1930/03/02.htm
[5] Raymond Birt “Personality and Foreign Policy: The Case of Stalin”, Political Psychology, Vol. 14, No. 4 (Dec., 1993), pp. 622-3.
[6] Anne Applebaum, Gulag; A History (London: The Penguin Press, 2003) pp. 94-6
[7] Joel Carmichael, Stalin's Masterpiece, (London: Morrison & Gibb Ltd, 1976), pp. 190-200.
[8] V.I. Lenin, “The State and Revolution”, Collected Works, Vol 25 (Lenin Internet Archive (marxists.org), 1993), accessed May 28, 2011, http://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1917/staterev/ch02.htm#s3.
[9] A.V. Miller, trans., Hegel's Science of Logic, (George Allen & Unwin, 1969), accessed May 28, 2011, http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/works/hl/hlnotion.htm#HL3_577b
[10] V.I. Lenin, “First Congress of the Communist International”, Collected Works, Vol 28 (Lenin Internet Archive (marxists.org), 2000) accessed May 28, 2011, http://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1919/mar/comintern.htm
[11] Robert Conquest, The Great Terror (London: Macmillan and Co Ltd., 1968) pp.5-6.
[12] Orlando Figes, A People's Tragedy (London: Penguin, 1997), pp. 630, 649.
[13] Joel Carmichael, Stalin's Masterpiece, (London: Morrison & Gibb Ltd, 1976), pp.5-6.
[14] Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago (New York: Harper & Row), p.60.
[15] Anne Applebaum, Gulag: A History (London: The Penguin Press, 2003), pp. 122-45
[16] Anne Applebaum, Chapter 7, “Arrest”, Gulag: A History, (London: The Penguin Press, 2003), p.140.
[17] Adam Hochschild, The Unquiet Ghost: Russians Remember Stalin, (New York: Penguin Books USA Inc., 1994), p.9.
[18] Joel Carmichael, Stalin's Masterpiece, (London: Morrison & Gibb Ltd, 1976), p.192.
[19] Robert Conquest, The Great Terror (London: Macmillan and Co Ltd., 1968) pp.8-13
[20] Robert Conquest, The Great Terror (London: Macmillan and Co Ltd., 1968) pp.18-20.
[21] Ibid., p.21.
[22] Ibid.
[23] J.V. Stalin, “Concerning Questions of Agrarian Policy in the U.S.S.R.”, Pravda, No. 309 (Marxists Internet Archive (marxists.org), 2008), accessed May 28, 2011, http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1929/12/27.htm
[24] J.A. Getty, G.T. Ritterspoon, V.N. Zemskov, “Victims of the Soviet Penal System in the Pre-war Years”, American Historical Review, Vol. 98, No. 4 (October 1993), pp.1019-23
[25] J.V. Stalin, “Dizzy with Success”, Pravda, No. 60, (March 2, 1930), (Marxists Internet Archive (marxists.org), 2008), accessed May 28, 2011, http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1930/03/02.htm
[26] Slavoj Zizek, Chapter 2, “Why is Woman a Symptom of Man?”, Enjoy Your Symptom! (New York: Routledge Classics, 2008), pp.33-70.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Terror Teacher: Hated, Then Remembered

...Terror Teacher; Hated then, Remember How do we define a teacher? Simple, a teacher is a person who provides education for students. A person who nurture and help individual to find and develop his skill and abilities. Teacher, a friendly, generous, funny, approachable courageous, knowledgeable person and an inspiration to all of the students and teachers alike. There are different types of teachers. It may be a friendly teacher, model teacher, strict teacher and funny teacher. Everyone wants an ideal teacher, which have the good characteristics. A teacher-friend, that can be a friend and a guidance, a teacher that always smile and make learning a enjoyable experience, a teacher who always cheer up the whole class, and a teacher that easy to go with. Students like a teacher who is smooth in teaching and don’t push too hard the students and also, students like a teacher who refrains from giving harsh comments to calm, instead, he give encouraging and strengthening words. Whoever encounter this kind of teacher will be considered as lucky. But there is a kind of teacher who is completely different from an ideal teacher. It is the teacher that students afraid to be their teacher. It is called the terror teacher. Every one hates to encounter a terror teacher, which define as a teacher who is very tough on students. A terror teacher is way too different from other teachers in terms of way of teaching, way of speaking, way of addressing his students and way of encouraging the students...

Words: 1038 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

The Gods Will Have Blood

...it is good or evil. Throughout The Gods will have Blood, Gamelin speaks of his beliefs within the revolution and on his trust within the ideas of Marat and Robespierre. He used the theme of violence that eventually helped progress into an inspiration leading to the Revolution. Throughout this novel, we find that Robespierre and Gamelin are two very influential people because not only do their actions characterize power, they show how power is a corrupting force when put in the hands of a few. During the years of the French Revolution there were blasts of changes that were being made that would perpetually change history. Anatole France’s The Gods will have Blood took place during the terrifying time of terror in which many were executed for the belief that it was justice to kill those who were no longer loyal to the Republic. This time period caused such a stir of emotions within society because it targeted anyone and showed little mercy. A new tool during the terror time period developed and was known as the guillotine. It quickly became a bloody symbol of the French Revolution and of government terror to intimidate society. On page 75, Gamelin quotes, “Only the Guillotine can save our Country!” As Gamelin gained a spot he quickly goes mad and begins to lose himself. Gamelin started to develop more of a passion for the Republic...

Words: 1049 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

The Consequences of Fear in Poe’s “a Descent Into the Maelstrom, ” and Gogol’s “Viy”

...short story “The Descent into the Maelstrom,” and Nikolai Gogol’s “Viy,” evoke similar feelings within the reader. Both stories have fear as a central theme, specifically fear of the unknown. The stories have relatable ideas on how fear originates and what it can do to a person. In both stories fear stemmed from unexplainable chaos outside of the character’s control, terrorized them while simultaneously evoking human curiosity, and changed the protagonist for the worst. Both stories also have a clear message that fear can destroy you if you don’t take action against it. In both stories, the main terrors are sublime beings that cannot be explained. In Poe’s Maelstrom, the accounts of its phenomenon are mainly speculations, it is not fully explained. The main character says he has “inability to comprehend it… for, however conclusive on paper, it becomes altogether unintelligible, and even absurd, amid the thunder of the abyss.” (Poe 7) In Gogol’s “Viy,” the characters debate over how to recognize a witch- “’even if you knew the Psalter by heart, you could not recognize one’… ‘every witch has a little tail’…. ‘every old woman is a witch.’” (Gogol 43) Even a group of philosophers, men who should know the most about such supernatural things cannot explain them. Stories about the witch had traveled around, but it was hard to decipher fact from fiction. Each of the men had a different story to tell about the witch. “One had seen her come to the door of his house in the form of a hayrick;...

Words: 1535 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Economic History

...y Slide 1: Soviet Revolution Slide 2: 1905 - First Liberal Movements • ‘Bloody Sunday’: Workers wanted an improvement of their living conditions and claimed the necessity of a National Constituent Assembly. They went out to the front of the palace and showed their disagreement with the Tsar. • Tsar Nicholas II ordered his army to shoot against those people but, because of the population pressure, he had to create a parliament. Slide 3: The Parliament (Duma) had three parties: • The Constitutional Democratic Party – Kadett; • The Socialist Party – Mensheviks; • The Social Democratic Party - Bolsheviks. However, despotism remained in the Soviet regime and the Tsar controlled the parliament. Slide 4: 1917 - February Revolution • Kadett, with the population massive support, created a revolution. Again, Tsar ordered his army to shoot but, this time, they refused to do it. • Tsar’s army joined the revolution and the revolution won power against him. • It was implemented an interim government headed by Kadett. • Kadett intended to implement Liberalism. Slide 5: Monarchic Absolutist Regime -» Interim Government Slide 6: 1917 – October Revolution • Lenin returns from exile with the purpose to end with Liberalism and to impose Communism. • Lenin joins Trotsky and both lead a group of Bolsheviks that assault the parliament. • Through force, the Bolshevik Party dissolved the parliament (violence...

Words: 2199 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

The Cell

...The cell This semester I enrolled in the terrorism course. One of the requirements was to read a book called, The Cell, Inside the 9/11 Plot, and By John J. Miller. I thoroughly enjoy the topic of terrorism and I continually educate myself on this topic. I actually began to read the book the weekend of Sept 11th 2011. The book over all was a very intense book, it went into great details on many avenues of the 9/11 plot and what went wrong. I have written a review of my first hand account of this book and what it means to me. The authors do a very good job of providing an overview of the long string of Islamic fundamentalist attacks on American interests and the homeland, from the Meir Kahane assassination, on November 5, 1990, to the attacks on September 11, 2001.  In fact, they trace some of the origins of the reign of terror back to groups like the Black Liberation Army, which ended up overlapping with Muslim fundamentalists groups, helping to train them and to acquire arms.  It was actually in 1980, when the BLA, Black Panthers, Weather Underground, and others were engaging in domestic terrorism in and around New York City that the FBI and the New York Police Department formed a Joint Terrorism Task Force.  Most of the book follows the work of the JTTF in general and of Agent John O'Neill.  Mr. O'Neill, in a bitter irony, had just left the JTTF to take a job as Chief of Security at the World Trade Center when the towers were struck.   His stories, and John Miller’s long...

Words: 908 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

102 Minut5Es

...faces pressed against the windows trying to breathe (pg. 136). 4. In the name of god a voice wailed. in the name of god, in the name of god (pg. 156). 5. I just saw a guy rip his shirt off because it was on fire and jump (pg. 32) Catastrophe- an event producing a subversion of the order or system of things, a final event, usually of a calamitous nature; hence, sudden calamity; great misfortune. It’s a catastrophe because everyone is jumping for their life hence the great mistune of the planes that have hit the burning building. Astonishing- so remarkable as to elicit belief: amazing, fabulous, fantastic, and marvelous phenomenal, prodigious. It is astonishing that after all that is taking course the people is still in the building trying to start business instead of trying to evacuate. Heartbreaking- causing overwhelming grief or distress, producing a strong emotional reaction extremely sad or pitiful It is heartbreaking because the people are crying and calling out in the name of god. Disaster- a sudden event, such as an accident or a natural catastrophe, that causes great damage or loss of life. It’s a disaster because people are ripping their clothes off and jumping off building. Shocking- causing indignation or disgust: offensive, terrible, horrible, appalling, and awful. It’s shocking because the people are pressing their faces against the windows hence putting their self endangers off falling out. CURRENT EVENT...

Words: 861 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Deconstruction of an Argument by Margaret Mcmillan

...surrounding that day. Margaret McMillan is a professor of international history at the University of Oxford she has written many books on the Great War and the struggles of what these wars do to peace throughout the world. From what I can gather, the main argument being portrayed here is that of how these days history is too quickly made. What I mean by this is that we too quickly accept what is told to us as definitive history, be that by people of power or leaders of nations. It says that we should take what is told to us with a pinch of salt as even historians can read incorrectly what is being said through time. She also makes the point that we put too much confidence into what we are told by our leaders and simply go with it almost blindly without any disregard to if it is true or not. She opens up her case by discussing what another author overheard in a bar on the evening of September 11th 2001, that a pair of men was comparing the World Trade Centre attacks to that of Pearl Harbour in 1941. One of the men said to the other that it was the Vietnamese who bombed Pearl Harbour and that is what led to the Vietnam War; this was taken without hesitation by his friend as complete fact. From here she goes on to talk about president bush and what influenced his decisions to invade Afghanistan and Iraq, comparing him to the two men in that bar and how they had been given incorrect information, so too had president bush when he told the nation why they were going to...

Words: 1243 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Consensus of the People in Nazi Germany

...The vital element in maintaining Hitler’s regime remains one of the most controversial arguments amongst historians. There are many considerable factors. Historians such as Jaques Delarue and Hans Rothfels argue that terror was the main component to sustain control, whilst David Crew and Dick Geary believe it was propaganda that made it possible. However, there are other factors that are supported, for instance, contextual condition was backed by Ralph Flenly and Hans Rothfels and the people’s consent, as A.J.P. Taylor proposes, was the imperative constituent. Most historians have the same problem evaluating as they have different definitions for people’s consent. “Silent opposition” is the term used for the people who passively opposed. Dick Geary proposed, “Consent can only be measured in situations in which individuals can choose between real alternatives.” and opposition till death was not a real alternative. Therefore, “silent opposition” does not count for people’s consent. This hugely undermines the role of people’s consent in maintaining the regime as the most people were not actively involved in Nazi action despite its “overwhelming success” [1]. In the first interpretation, Flenly emphasized that although the German people were well-educated, they were blindfolded from the truth of what was really going on. The Nazis did make the German people more literate, for example, scheme of the People’s libraries where every parish of over 500 inhabitants was to have its...

Words: 2261 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

Philo

...whom we are dependent—God. We have always this feeling of dependency that we owe our life to God. It is when we recognize the presence of God in ourselves, it also that start for us feel and practice religious experience. Like for example, whenever I achieve an accomplishment or a goal, I always make sure that I will go to church and thanked God for it. I have this feeling that I should thank Him for guiding me and helping me to achieve such success. It shows that i am self-conscious about the presence of God to me. 2. Mysterious Tremendum et Fascinans by Rudolf Otto * The Mysterious Tremendum et Fascinan by Otto is his concept of Numinous or numen or divine. It is composed of three parts, such as: Mysterious/Mysterium is the experience of wholly other, or the blank wonder. Next is the Tremendum which is the awefulness-it is the terror or unapproachability “wrath of God”, overpoweringness as the sense of one’s own nothingness in contrast to its power, the creature-feeling or the sense of dependence, and energy, the vitality and will which explain that the world is full of energy because of God. And the Fascinans, it is the potent charm, the attractiveness in spite of fear or terror. For Otto, it is his Idea of Creature, that indeed our life is composed of the three elements of Numinous, where there are always wonder of what is to come, there is always terror and fear for something and there is always the joy after the fear because of overcoming such terror. ...

Words: 1268 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Cold War vs. War on Terror

...The Cold War period lasted for nearly 45 years, from 1945 to 1991. It began at the end of the Second World War and with the collapse of the Soviet Union. The war was the stage for the West's struggle against communist ideas and changes. This long wearing conflict brought to pass an increase in production and trade of arms and an appearance of a new world order formed by America. The main principle of the cold war can be seen as the East-West competition in ideas, arms and spheres of influence. (REF) After Afghan terrorists dramatically attacked the United States on September 11, 2001; America declared a war on terror and flew its troops into Afghanistan in pursuit of avenging their nation and capturing al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden. Again America found itself in opposition to the East, nevertheless this time a different region. And Again the East was fighting against this new world order and America's quest for world domination in a globalising world. The aim of the essay is to explore the relationship between the cold war and the ‘war on terror' in Afghanistan and to find similarities in political patterns and warfare, in order to answer the question Main Body - History Main question - Relationship The cold war marked the struggle between America and the USSR after the Second World War. The war influenced international affairs majorly. It influenced the way conflicts were handled, the way countries were divided up and the increasing growth in weaponry production...

Words: 3840 - Pages: 16

Free Essay

Nothing

...HISTORY 1500 WINTER 2014 RESEARCH ESSAY TOPICS 1. Select a crusade and discuss the extent to which it accomplished its objectives. Why did it succeed or fail? Jonathan Riley-Smith, The Crusades: A Short History; Carole Hillenbrand, The Crusades: Islamic Perspectives; Christopher Tyerman, God’s War: A New History of the Crusades 2. How did anti-Semitism manifest itself in medieval Europe? Kenneth R. Stow, Alienated Minority: The Jews of Medieval Latin Europe; Mark R. Cohen, Under Crescent and Cross: The Jews in the Middle Ages; Solomon Grayzel, The Church and the Jews in the Thirteenth Century 3. What was the position of prostitutes in medieval society? Ruth Mazo Karras, Common Women; Leah Otis, Prostitution in Medieval Society; Margaret Wade Labarge, A Small Sound of the Trumpet: Women in Medieval Life 4. Why did the French choose to follow Joan of Arc during the the Hundred Years War? Kelly DeVries, Joan of Arc: A Military Leader; Bonnie Wheeler, ed., Fresh Verdicts on Joan of Arc; Margaret Wade Labarge, A Small Sound of the Trumpet: Women in Medieval Life 5. Discuss the significance of siege warfare during the crusades. You may narrow this question down to a single crusade if you wish. Jim Bradbury, The Medieval Siege; Randall Rogers, Latin Siege Warfare in the Twelfth Century; John France, Victory in the East: A Military History of the First Crusade 6. Why did the persecution...

Words: 5531 - Pages: 23

Free Essay

Metal Essay

...STALIN, THE GREAT PURGE, AND RUSSIAN HISTORY: A NEW LOOK AT THE ~EW by MARSHALL SHATZ Paper No. 305 1984 CLASS' STALIN, THE GREAT PURGE, AND RUSSIAN HISTORY: A NEW LOOK AT THE 'NEW CLASS' ~ MARSHALL SHATZ Paper No. 305 1984 Marshall S. Shatz received his B.A. from Harvard College and his M.A., Certificate of the Russian Institute, and Ph.D. from Columbia University. He edited The Essential Works of Anarchism (New York: Bantam Books, 1971; Quadrangle Books, 1972) and is the author of Soviet Dissent in Historical ¥erspective (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1980). He is Professor of History, University of Massachusetts at Boston. 1 STALIN; THE GREAT PURGE; AND RUSSIAN HIsroRY: A NEW IOOK AT '!HE • NEW CLASS' Though nearly fifty years in the past; Stalin •s Great Purge of the 1930s still loans as one of the nost enigmatic events of the twentieth century. Whether we think of the Great Purge as a IOOre or less continuous process fran the assassination of Kirov in 1934 to Ezhov's replacement by Beria as head of the secret police at the em of 1938; or limit it to the EzhoVshchina of 1937 and 1938; When the terror reached its peak; operation is astounding. the sheer nagnitude of the The nuniber of arrests; deportations; imprisonments; and lives lost in these years is impossible to measure; and attempts to do so have varied wildly. Even the lOi/est estimates; however; are staggering.l It ...

Words: 13189 - Pages: 53

Free Essay

Soft Power

...a narrative and linguistic process. This literature, however, has downplayed some of the other deep-seated underpinnings of soft power, which this article argues lie in the dynamics of affect. Building upon the International Relations affect and aesthetics literatures, this article develops the concept of soft power as rooted in the political dynamics of emotion and introduces the concept of affective investment. The attraction of soft power stems not only from its cultural influence or narrative construction, but more fundamentally from audiences’ affective investments in the images of identity that it produces. The empirical import of these ideas is offered in an analysis of the construction of American attraction in the war on terror. Keywords Affect, discourse, emotion, narrative, Nye, soft power Introduction In her confirmation hearings in January 2009 before the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton argued that to deal with a multiplicity of pressing global issues, the US ‘must...

Words: 12815 - Pages: 52

Free Essay

Gothic as Portrayed in Frankenstein

...the great cathedral, Saint-Denis, of Paris. Then the Westminster Abbey of London was built. These are characterized by their pointed arches and flying buttresses. Gothicism also came in the form of art. Tres Riches Heures du duc de Berry, by the Limburg brothers, showed elegance through statements in the best known way of gothic art. This popular style of art is called manuscript illuminations. Manuscript illuminations are text followed by decoration, usually gold. During the mid-18th century, literature took a new step having the first gothic novel, "The Castle of Otranto," first published in 1764. This novel was combined with a horror and mystery genre (Martindale).  Gothicism began to be apart of churches by having stained glass windows and pictures of biblical people. The style of nudity from Adam and Eve was also portrayed to be gothic. As Gothicism grew it rose to the 1980's and started a movement called punk, and later related to Fantasy Art. It then, in the 1990s, blossomed to what is called Neo-Gothic Art. It is inspired by Charles Alexander Moffat and is a period when the people wanted to express themselves as more than normal in a number of ways. A person of example would be Marilyn Manson, whose personal style and music is characterized as being "dark" and "mysterious" (Folkenroth).  Characteristics of gothic novels have scenes and settings where the character feels threatened, or has an overabundance of emotions, such as, anger, sorrow, surprise, and terror. We...

Words: 710 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Terrorism: Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

...TERRORISM IS TERRORISM, BUT WHICH IS WORSE? YOU DECIDE Alexandra Gadi THST 398 – Dr. Soomekh Final Paper Due: April 29, 2011 Terrorism in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has been an impacting factor on both sides, resulting in numerous and unnecessary casualties. Israel’s terrorism was rooted mainly from Gush Emunim, “Bloc of the Faithful” . On the other hand, Palestinian terrorism has spawned from a wide scope of different beliefs ranging from secular Palestinians through religious Jihadists. Jihad literary means struggle in Arabic . These Jihadists and secular terrorists blow themselves up with the belief that they are furthering their cause and feel as if they are warriors fighting in the battle for a homeland and freedom, one explosion at a time. Gush Emunim started as a Jewish fundamentalist movement in Israel that sought out to reclaim the lands of Abraham through a combination of propaganda, religious justification, and military force . Gush Emunim’s action “shows the growing resentment by Jewish fundamentalism of moves for peace. This, logically, was to lead to the “righteous” killing of [Yitzchak] Rabin” . Gush Emunim has used its religious power as a stepping-stone into Israeli politics in order to gain legal support for its settlement plans. The Gush Emunim movement has been made responsible for evicting Palestinian refugees from their homes in order to build their own settlements . Basing their...

Words: 2399 - Pages: 10