Premium Essay

How Does Shakespeare Differ

Submitted By
Words 1045
Pages 5
Two Masterful Sonnets of Detail
In “Sonnet 33” and Sonnet “144”, Shakespeare presented a masterful skill of using specific detail to represent his pieces. Even though Shakespeare writes plays for theatre purposes, he “makes the Sonnets themselves his living art.”(Edsmon and Wells) In “Sonnet 144”, Shakespeare uses dark phrases to describe about his two different loves and how they interact with each other while in”Sonnet 33”, Shakespeare describes something that is more beautiful than anything that he has ever seen. In his sonnets, Shakespeare uses rhyme scheme, metaphor, and imagery to make readers understand his themes and specific details of the sonnets. By using rhyme scheme, Shakespeare structures his quatrains to have a rhyming sound …show more content…
In Shakespeare’s “Sonnet 33,” he used “sovereign eye” (Line 2) to prove that he had the ability to verify what true beauty was when he described the morning and landscape. Basically, in the beginning of Shakespeare’s “Sonnet 33”, he uses a lot of metaphor to describe the landscape that he sees. Another example is when he said “gliding pale streams” (4) and “heavenly alchemy” (4). In these metaphors, he describes the streams in the landscape to be “heavenly” as if it came from Mount Olympus itself. Shakespeare also compares the sky to have a “celestial face” (6) which expresses that the morning sky was extremely bright like a star in the sky. In the beginning of the “Sonnet 144”, Shakespeare uses metaphor to describe two different types of spirits that are always around him. In “Sonnet 144”, Shakespeare talks about a “spirit” being a “worser spirit.” (Line 4) So, this explains that one of the spirits that is around him is a devious “spirit.” He also describes it in another specific detail by stating its color to be “coloured ill.” (4) The “evil” spirit that Shakespeare talks about it mentioned many times in this Sonnet since he thinks says it is overruling the other. He talks about it again by calling it his “female evil.” (5) Shakespeare also tells us how the spirit tries to transform the other spirit into a dreadful one by persuading it with its “foul pride.” (8) “Shakespeare’s …show more content…
Since Shakespeare wanted people to think or visualize what he thinks, using imagery was a good way to do that to also keep people constantly thinking and somewhat entertained. In this sonnet, Shakespeare established “a correspondence between imperfect nature.” (Farby) Before describing a certain someone in the “Sonnet 33”, Shakespeare first describes the “glorious morning” (Line 1) which he used as one of the most beautiful things he seen. He also uses it to have a common image that everyone’s seen. Shakespeare mainly starts off with this specific imagery to set out the scheme for imagery in this sonnet. To describe how beautiful the landscape is in the beautiful morning, he adds that the land was “meadows green” (4) with “pale streams.” (4) Shakespeare describes the land to be extremely green with beautiful rivers running through it almost making people thinking that he was looking at a valley. People can probably visualize it as a valley when Shakespeare says that the morning brings out the “mountain tops” (2). But not everything was beautiful with the morning according to Shakespeare since a “basest cloud” (5) had interfered with the beauty of the morning. In “Sonnet 144”, Shakespeare clearly presents a image of “two spirits” (Line2) in the second line. The two “spirits” that Shakespeare presents in the beginning of “Sonnet 144” were the keystones

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Macbeth: Comparison Between The Book And The Movie

...Is the movie better than the book? That is a question asked by those who have read Macbeth, and those who have thought about watching the Great Performances: Macbeth. Even though this is a simple yes or no question, the answer to this is complex in nature. This is apparent when comparisons are drawn between the film and the play; likewise, the comparison allows the audience of both works to see that the movie and the play are drastically different from one another. Moreover, the answer to this question is no; this becomes apparent when the viewer compares how Rupert Goold conveyed various themes, developed various elements of the story, and created his own story. The way that Goold conveyed various themes is the first reason why the film is not as...

Words: 1342 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Romeo and Juliet

...‘Romeo and Juliet/Catrin/Follower’ Controlled Assessment: Examining Shakespeare’s ideologies on parental influence and the impact on modern/Elizabethan audiences: Examine the way Shakespeare presents the relationship between Juliet and her parents. By Tiffanie Gould, 10x1 The iconic tragedy written by the world’s most honoured writer William Shakespeare, ‘Romeo and Juliet’ is a title the world is familiar with. Its impact on modern society is impeccable, whether related to love, tragedy or both moral and academic education, the modern media adopts its philosophy. Shakespeare is trying to educate, and the ever-pending battle is the matter of character vs. society; relationships differ even today between parent and child, and the way it may be interpreted is affected by women’s role in society in Elizabethan England and how the audience’s perspective of prejudice and patriarchy. Shakespeare explores emotions and allows adjustments in the relationship in an attempt to drop the audience’s jaws open in eras of both old and new. In this assessment, I will examine just how the way Shakespeare presents the relationship between Juliet and Lord/Lady Capulet with supported evidence. Lord Capulet: the very wealthy patriarch of the Capulet family and empire, probably just as important, the husband of Lady Capulet, the uncle of Tybalt, potential father-in-law of Count Paris, legitimate (but unknowingly) the father-in-law of Romeo Montague… and the father of Juliet Capulet-Montague....

Words: 4047 - Pages: 17

Premium Essay

History

...‘Romeo and Juliet/Catrin/Follower’ Controlled Assessment: Examining Shakespeare’s ideologies on parental influence and the impact on modern/Elizabethan audiences: Examine the way Shakespeare presents the relationship between Juliet and her parents. By Tiffanie Gould, 10x1 The iconic tragedy written by the world’s most honoured writer William Shakespeare, ‘Romeo and Juliet’ is a title the world is familiar with. Its impact on modern society is impeccable, whether related to love, tragedy or both moral and academic education, the modern media adopts its philosophy. Shakespeare is trying to educate, and the ever-pending battle is the matter of character vs. society; relationships differ even today between parent and child, and the way it may be interpreted is affected by women’s role in society in Elizabethan England and how the audience’s perspective of prejudice and patriarchy. Shakespeare explores emotions and allows adjustments in the relationship in an attempt to drop the audience’s jaws open in eras of both old and new. In this assessment, I will examine just how the way Shakespeare presents the relationship between Juliet and Lord/Lady Capulet with supported evidence. Lord Capulet: the very wealthy patriarch of the Capulet family and empire, probably just as important, the husband of Lady Capulet, the uncle of Tybalt, potential father-in-law of Count Paris, legitimate (but unknowingly) the father-in-law of Romeo Montague… and the father of Juliet Capulet-Montague....

Words: 4047 - Pages: 17

Premium Essay

Examine How Shakespeare Presents the Treatment of Juliet by Romeo, Her Parents and Society in General.

...Examine how Shakespeare presents the treatment of Juliet by Romeo, her Parents and Society in general. In Romeo and Juliet, Shakespeare presents the treatment of Juliet by Romeo, her Parents, and Society in general through the interactions and conversations between Juliet and the other characters. Shakespeare uses the interactions between not only Juliet and the other characters but the interactions between the other characters themselves as well. Many of the ways the Juliet is treated stay the same between characters because there is an overall patriarchal feel to the play which reflects on the authority of men at the time but her treatment does differ slightly with different characters and their importance to her. One of ways the Shakespeare presents the treatment of Juliet is through the prologue. All though the prologue is not a character is gives us an idea of how Shakespeare and ‘fate’ treat Juliet. Part of the function of the prologue is to introduce the play and the key themes and ideas. The prologue tells us that ‘a pair of star crossed lovers take their life’ telling us that Romeo and Juliet were born to die. From the beginning Juliet has been destined to die, she has no control and neither to the other characters. This is an example of how fate is controlling the whole play. Another way that Shakespeare presents the treatment of Juliet is through her parents. Juliet’s Father and Mother both treat Juliet differently but there are similarities in the way they treat...

Words: 837 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Role of Dramatic Text in Performance

...performance text is a version of a dramatic text that has been annotated and altered for the actual performance. This complicates the role of dramatic text, as there can be various different performance texts just for one dramatic text. Therefore you have to question, after a certain period of time, if the performances turn further and further away from what the dramatic text is trying to convey? Considering William Shakespeare’s Hamlet, which is such an ‘iconic text of world theatre’ (Lavender, 5), you can compare the role of the dramatic text when it was first published and performed in around 1603 with performances leading up to the present day. This is something which doesn't only differ depending on what time period it is being performed or how renowned the text is but it differs from performance to performance mainly because of the various different concepts the directors have with this singular play. However, factors such as the set or audience can also have a considerable effect. Nevertheless, ‘we have to develop Shakespeare’s plays, if we are to perform them at all’ (Elsom, 6). As time passes, new theories are put into place and old ones need to be revisited and updated, which may be as simple as modernising costume or having more set or it may be as lavish as imposing a whole concept on the play through the different elements of theatre. Dramatic text in performance can take on...

Words: 2656 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Hate In Romeo And Juliet

...short bit of content which depicts, compresses and sensationalizes the affection and contempt in the play. Shakespeare portrays the key indicates and subjects the play and outlines the plot. We additionally realize that there is struggle between the two families and that there is a differentiating theme (contempt and love). It enlightens us about the feud between the families and the battles they get into, the affection amongst Romeo and Juliet and how they both die toward the end. This promptly presents the sicken between the families that there is all through the play. It investigates the way that the two families truly loathe each other and...

Words: 570 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Richard III Evil Vs Evil

...In the opening monologue of Richard III, Richard proclaims one of the most famous lines of the play: “I am determined to prove a villain” (Shakespeare, 11). Because of this direct address of Richard’s intentions, the audience is never left questioning why he commits the atrocities he does throughout the course of the play. Although Richard is undoubtedly evil, each viewer’s criteria for what constitutes this characteristic differs, so Shakespeare attempts to make Richard a universally evil character by giving him multiple unforgivable attributes. According to Shakespeare evil is defined by actions that benefit the perpetrator and cause harm to others, specifically in instances that would impact familial and English societal order. Losing a family member is akin to losing part of oneself....

Words: 1057 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

How Does Shakespeare Present Miranda In The Tempest

...teaching Miranda, Miranda admits that she “took pains to make [Caliban] speak, taught [Caliban] each hour” the knowledge bestowed upon her (Shakespeare, 1.2. 354). In this instance, Miranda seems not only to have overcome her status as a barbarian, but she seems to have a position equal to that of Prospero. Just as Prospero was the schoolteacher of Miranda, Miranda was the schoolteacher of Caliban. There is, however, a contradictory element to this position. Miranda claims that she not only taught Caliban, but that she was able to transform Caliban from one who “didst not… know thine own meaning”...

Words: 1266 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Horatio And Hamlet Similarities

...Hamlet, by William Shakespeare, can be quite difficult to comprehend at fight sight. Some of the many characters in the play support the similarities and differences shown in Hamlet. Certain traits seen in these characters are sometimes seen in Hamlet, adding to who he’s seen as. Without these characters, there wouldn’t be the development seen by Hamlet’s character. By having them, Shakespeare attributes to Hamlet without deliberately saying it. In the play, the main ideas shown by some characters is betrayal and revenge. This idea is mainly developed through the similarities and differences seen between Horatio and Laertes towards Hamlet. Horatio compares in a way that...

Words: 585 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Othello Essay

...protagonist who is known as Othello, and Emilia, the wife of the antagonist Iago. Although they are both loyal to their husbands, we can contrast how both woman portray the theme loyalty. In Othello we can see how both woman want to satisfy their husbands. Desdemona is known for beauty, intelligence and caring personality. Throughout the play, Desdemona shows loyalty to her husband in many ways. In Act 1, Scene 3 Desdemona explains to her father that she owes him for giving her life and education. Now she is married to Othello. “My noble father, I do perceive here a divided duty. To you I am bound for life and education. My life and education both do learn me how to respect you. You are the lord of duty. I am hither to your daughter. But here’s my husband. And so much duty as my mother showed to you, preferring you before her father, so much I challenge that I may profess due to the moor my lord” (Shakespeare 1.3,182-191). Desdemona is clear that she will always be loyal to her husband. She explains her duty as a daughter and a wife. This shows us that she is loyal to her husband for eloping with him and going against her father. Secondly, In Act 4, Scene 2 Othello accuses Desdemona of not being faithful to him. He implies her as the devil and damns her to hell for lying. “ Your wife, my lord. Your true and loyal wife” ( Shakespeare 4.2, 35-36). In this scene,...

Words: 846 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Compare the Ways in Which Shakespeare and Marvell Have Used Poetic Form, Structure and Language to Present Their Thoughts and Feelings of Love

...Compare the ways in which Shakespeare and Marvell have used poetic form, structure and language to present their thoughts and feelings of love Both Shakespeare and Marvell present a vast array of thoughts and feelings regarding love. Shakespeare makes his true thoughts and feelings apparent through a declaration in ‘Sonnet 116’ by stating how love cannot be shaken by adversary or changed by time. However, in Marvell’s ‘To his Coy Mistress’ the speaker is more impatient, presenting a sense of carnal desire to fulfil his sexual desires rather than true love. Where Shakespeare is influenced by the concept of romantic love in the Elizabethan era and follows traditional sonnet formats to create passion, Marvell creates a satirical tone to comment on romantic love through the conventions of a metaphysical poem. Despite this difference, time is personified in both poems to represent an enemy of all lovers. Shakespeare is inspired by his era and is more sincere and passionate in his portrayal and belief of true and constant love in ‘Sonnet 116’, whereas in Marvell’s ‘To his Coy Mistress’, the speaker is driven by passion and desire to fulfil lust, that could potentially turn into love. Marvell’s representation may be harsh, but it is more considerate of a harsher reality. Through structure, Shakespeare defines his true feelings of love – by telling the reader what love is, and what it isn’t. It presents the extreme ideal of romantic love and insists that this is the only love that...

Words: 2153 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Merchant of Venice

...The Merchant of Venice, a play by William Shakespeare written from 1596 to 1598 is most remembered for its dramatic scenes inspired by its main character Shylock. However, merchant Antonio, instead of the Jewish moneylender Shylock, is the play’s most famous character. Although frequently staged today, the play presents a great deal of controversy due to its central anti-Semitic themes. In actual fact, the play holds a strong stance on anti-Semitism. Over the Elizabethan era English society had been regarded as anti-Semitic until the rule of Oliver Cromwell. Jews, often depicted as avaricious usurers, were hideously caricaturized with bright red wigs and hooked noses, and so were mainly associated with evil, greed and deception. In the 1600s in Venice Jews were required to put on red hats as a symbol of their identity. Failure to adhere to this requirement resulted in the death penalty. The then Jews lived in a ghetto which was protected by Christians for their own safety. For such protection Jews should have paid their guards, and Shakespeare’s is regarded as a vivid example of such anti-Semitic tradition. More than that, critics argue that Shakespeare intended to contrast the vengefulness of a Jew lacking religious grace to comprehend mercy with the mercy of the main Christian characters. At that Shakespeare showed Shylock’s forced conversion to Christianity as it redeemed Shylock both from his unbelief and his willingness to kill Antonio. Therefore, the anti-Semitic...

Words: 610 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Foils in King Lear

...as it is the main theme carried by the characters that will be compared and contrasted in this text, Kent and Oswald, two servants with mostly, but not always, opposite natures. Kent and Oswald’s characters quite clearly contrast each other in many levels. Kent’s line “No contraries hold more antipathy/Than I and such a knave” (7, 84-85) is well representative of the connection of these two characters in the play. The most obvious contrast between the two is the people they serve. Kent’s master, King Lear, and Oswald’s master, Gonoril, are enemies in the story as the motivations and actions of one bring the other one down. This marks the most superficial difference between Kent and Oswald. Another aspect in which these two servants differ is their morality and values. Kent, an extremely loyal servant, motivated by defending his values, confronts Lear after the King banishes his daughter for being truthful. He explains “To plainness honour’s bound/ When majesty stoops to folly” (1, 139-140) meaning that he honors his value, plainness, more than the King’s judgment when he feels that the King is wrong. This is of course done in complete loyalty to the King, even though Lear’s blind to it, since Kent is trying to make Lear see that he is making a mistake. Therefore, when it would have been in his best interest to stay silent, Kent decided to speak out in defense of his values and in best interest of the King. However, when...

Words: 1192 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Hamlet Act 4 Scene 4

...Hamlet, a play by William Shakespeare, was originally performed in 1602 at the Globe Theatre by the Lord Chamberlain’s Men (CliffsNotes). The play had an audience that consisted of both high and low class citizens. Shakespeare made his plays enjoyable to his diverse audience by making them relatable. Hamlet’s speech in Act 4 Scene 4 is one that does exactly that. It can relate to its various listeners, but still be interpreted differently by each one. The original Hamlet performance was astounding to the Elizabethan audience...

Words: 955 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Lion King and Hamlet - Compare and Contrast

...Similarities and Differences Between The Lion King and Hamlet As innocent and young the Disney movie “The Lion King” may seem, it is, indeed, loosely based off of the renowned Shakespeare play “Hamlet”. It would seem strange to the typical audiences of each, but when looked at closer, it is seen that they are actually related underneath the youthful, animated surface of The Lion King. One of the main aspects that connects The Lion King and Hamlet is the characters. Simba and Hamlet are both princes of their kingdoms. Hamlet, a man, and Simba, a lion cub, are in the same situation which is coping with and avenging their fathers’ deaths. Hamlet goes crazy and creates a whole plan of revenge but Simba simply runs from the problem altogether only to come face to face with it later. Nala, representing Ophelia, is a beautiful young lion as Ophelia is a beautiful young girl. Both have a developing relationship with the prince of the kingdom. Although they play practically the same part, Nala is more forceful and stubborn than Ophelia who is obedient and passive more times than not. Another difference between the two is that Nala doesn’t die at the end of the movie as Ophelia dies in Hamlet by suicide. Scar and Claudius is another pair that is quite obviously nearly reversible. Scar, through means of a stampede, causes the death of Mufassa and properly manipulates the situation so as to make Simba think it was his own fault. Simba carries this guilt for years and years to come. Claudius...

Words: 1038 - Pages: 5