Free Essay

How Far Were the Policies of the Republican Party the Main Reason for America’s Economic Success in the 1920’s

In: Historical Events

Submitted By xxlianne07xx
Words 2565
Pages 11
How far were the policies of the Republican Party the main reason for America’s economic success in the 1920’s [50 marks]

Although America remained neutral and did not join World War One until 1917, they were already increasing their country’s profits by selling goods such as: weapons, food, equipment and other ammunition to both sides of the war. During World War One, as well as selling goods, America became ‘the banker’ to the rest of the world: loaning countries money at a very high interest. According to the First World War commissions “Britain, France and Italy owed the USA $22 billion plus interest”, this is showing that USA was at a very stable place financially even before the 1920s began. When the war ended Woodrow Wilson put forward his 14 Points which included a League of Nations. The League of Nations’ overall aim was to prevent war from breaking out again. America’s congress at the time decided that it would be best for America in the long run not to join the League of Nations because, congress believed that the USA should not interfere in any European or world affairs. Refusal to join the League of Nations made America an isolationist country. When Warren G. Harding won the presidential election and became president in 1921 a political party called the Republicans took over from the Democrats and the American government. 1920s America was known as the ‘Roaring twenties’ because of the entertainment and the crazes sweeping the country. There were lots of reasons for the economic boom including: natural resources, impact of the war entertainment, mass production, mass marketing, credits and the policies of the Republican party. All of these made America such a prosperous country a reputation that continues today. In my opinion I think that the Republicans were a reason for America’s economic success in the 1920’s however I think that they weren't the main reason.

When Warren Harding won the election in 1920 the Republican Party took over the Democrats, changing the American government. The Democrats liked to get involved with the government and society whereas the Republicans did as little interference as possible and let businesses and individuals run their companies how they wanted to making the American dream a reality. The Republicans remained in power throughout the 1920’s because they won votes off the senate and the House of Representatives; the public supported the Republicans because of the policies they introduced during the decade. In my opinion the most important policy that the Republicans introduced in the 1920’s was tariffs. This policy was put into place when Warren Harding promised a “return to normality” In order for his promise to be fulfilled he increased tariffs and introduced the Fordney McCumber Act of 1922. The Fordney McCumber act imposed a tax on goods from foreign countries making them ALWAYS more expensive than American goods. Also cutting taxes would be an effective policy for the Republican government because they believed that if taxes were low, people would have more money to invest in stocks and shares. These investments would help the American industries expand. The danger with the Fordney McCumber tariff for the American economy in the long run was that every country used them and stopped American exports, which damaged the international trade, a reason why the Republicans disliked trade unions. The name of this Republican policy was protectionism. Another policy that was introduced was by Calvin Coolidge (1923-29) and that policy was Laissez-Faire. Laissez-Faire is French and it translates ‘to leave alone’, which is exactly what the government did by interfering as little as possible with the running of the businesses and peoples lives. This was important because this allowed businessmen and entrepreneurs such as: Henry Ford, J.D. Rockefeller and Harvey Firestone to run their own business with no restrictions from the government, which allowed more jobs and an increase in the country’s wealth. A famous quote from Coolidge is “The business of America is business” this means that America’s job was to make as much money as they can; this was achieved by using the laissez-faire policy. The laissez-faire policy gave businessmen the freedom to make their own money and become rich. During the 1920’s the Republicans also lowered taxes on income and company profits, this allowed that the money they invested to be spent on American industries’ and buildings resulting in people having more jobs, which allowed people to have more money, which allowed them to buy more consumer gods. A phrase used to showcase people success was ‘rugged individualism,’ A rugged individual should not depend on the government for help and should solve their own problems by working hard. All Republicans believed that people succeeded with their own hard work. Although America felt wealthier than ever in the 1920s lots of people were left out such as: black people, Native Americans, immigrants and farmers. Though the policies of the Republican party/presidents was a reason for America’s economic success, there were other factors that contributed to the boom.

“Car sales were the key to American prosperity in the 1920s” writes B.Manning in his autobiography which was published in 1981. This is suggesting that other people thought that car sales were a more important reason than the policies of the Republican Party for the boom of America in the 1920s. Some Americans would agree with this because the price of the car went from $850 in 1908 to about on average just $250 in 1925, this meant that nearly every American owned a ‘Model T’ car made by Henry Ford. A ‘Model T’ car was slow and very difficult to drive however every person in America wanted one because of the advertisements, Calvin Coolidge said: “Advertising makes new thought, new desirers, and new actions. It is the most powerful influence in adapting and changing the habits and the way of life affecting what we eat what we wear and the work and play of the whole nation” Henry Ford made it possible for nearly every American to own a car because he used mass production and standardization. The cars were made on an assembly line in which parts of the vehicle were added as it was passed along the line, all the workers would do nothing else but that one job, so as they fixed the part quicker more cars would be produced in a day. Ford was producing a car every 10 seconds. “Customers can have a car painted any colour that he wants as long as it’s black” was the phrase that explained standardization. Standardization is when a product is only available in one colour or one size. The motor industry lead also lead to other industries such as: steel, rubber, glass and leather. Mass production lead to an increase in car sales, this allowed more jobs in industries, diners, motels and gas stations, all this lead to America becoming more prosperous. Texas which was famous for oil, and as a result of this grew rich as they were drilling oil and supplying every car with petrol, oil was also known as ‘black gold.’ In my opinion I think that mass production and the motor industry played a big part in the economic boom. I think that maybe it is a more important reason than the policies of the republican presidents. All of the increase in car sales wouldn’t have been possible if it wasn’t for advertising. As well as Henry Ford and mass production, advertising played a big part in America’s economic success. Henry Ford’s motor company wouldn’t be as big as it was if it wasn’t for advertising. Advertising changed the minds of American citizens, because they would feel less of an American person if they did not have a particular product. More consumer goods became more available in the 1920’s and more houses had electricity. Companies wanted to make sure that people could buy products easily so advertising became very popular in the 1920’s. There were lots of ways in which companies such as: Coca Cola and Henry Ford advertised their goods, this included: billboards, catalogs, T.V and radios. There are catalogs Sears Roebuck which advertised these goods. During the 1920’s perhaps as a result of an increase in wealth many Americans stated to think that they deserved a little luxury and that they should try to keep up with their neighbors’ lifestyles. Majority of the American population were prepared to borrow money or pay for things using credit so that they could have the latest product whether it may be a new fridge, new radios, whatever it maybe the nation was prepared to take risks. Department stores introduced a buy now pay later scheme this was known as hire purchase however the only negative thing about this is the longer you take to pay them back the higher your interest would be, so you could buy a new TV, for $650 and pay $800 by the time you pay the company back. Advertising created a cycle of prosperity: because of advertising, the demands for goods increased, industries increased, more shop were available, more people needed jobs, the more jobs people had the more money they had, and all of the money they had they could buy new products. In my opinion I think that so far advertising was the main reason for America’s success because without it mass production wouldn’t have been possible, businesses wouldn’t have grow and the Republicans wouldn’t have had to introduced by the policies.

Although the stock market was a potential risk for America’s economy, this wasn’t always the case in the 20’s. President Hoover made Americans feel that they were economically safe and secure in the country because he said that American people had more luxuries, better homes and nicer clothes and fuller bank accounts than any other country. Anyone can be rich was a popular phrase in America in the 1920s because it gave people confidence and hope as it encouraged them to keep taking risks and to keep buying on margin. Buying on margin meant that when normal citizens did not have enough money to buy the stocks they would have had to borrow money from banks. They could borrow money from small banks all around town. These banks would be happy to lend people money because the will make profit by increasing the interest rate. Stockbrokers would have had to charge people high interest rates to make profit and they were also able to demand payment of the loan at any time. This would stimulate the economy and encourage other businesses to grow. People were tempted to buy and sell shares on the stock market because it was an easy way for them to become rich. In the 1920’s many speculator bought stocks on margin and as they were so confident they never considered the risk that they were taking. Speculators are people who hoped to make lots of money on the stock market. However those risk people took consequently led to the Great Depression and the Wall Street crash later on in the century.

America during the 1920s saw the development of the cinema industry. Hollywood which was just outside of Los Angeles, California was the location for a number of studios including: MGM, Warner Brothers and Paramount. They chose California for the location of these studios as it was always summer in this American state. As wealth increased so did the desire for entertainment, according to the Historian Josh Brooman “film makers realised that the star or leading performers were more important than its plot.” This source is saying that no matter how bad a film was people came to the cinemas to see stars. Stars in the 1920s that people came to see in movies were either: Charlie Chaplin, Clara Bow or Al Johnson. The cinema like advertising also created a cycle of prosperity; as more movies were being made, more sets were needed to built, more jobs became available to become an actor or an actress, all of these increased Americas economic success even more. More cinema tickets were being sold in the 1920s as a British Historian called David Ferriby writes “by 1929 going to the movies has became a national habit and 110 million people were going to the cinema each week” Going to the cinema became a popular habit for Americans because it was easily accessible as people had more cars and movie theatres were everywhere. People would go to the cinema to escape their busy lifestyles and watch films that were an accurate reflection of American life. Also going to the cinemas allowed Americans to see films where they could just escape their busy life and imagine a whole other life. Ernst Lubitsch a Hollywood film director said that “American audiences were most interested in what cutlery to use, what hairstyles to wear and how to mix cocktails.” Films like these showed people how to behave and influenced the way they lived their lives. Ordinary citizens wanted to be like their heroes and so movie stars made films that would influence normal people’s lives and make a change in society. All the films made in Hollywood were exported all over the world and this helped the USA to become economically successful because countries would pay America for the right to play their films in their own country. Entertainment was a key part of America’s economic success because people had more time as a result of consumer goods and wanted to be entertained. Some of the entertainment relied on buying goods like radios and TVs; others would pay for the entertainment for example going to the cinema, however they all had one thing in common; they all added money back in the economy.

To conclude, I think that the policies of the Republican Party were important for America’s economic success in the 1920’s to an extent. I however feel that they weren’t the most important factor that contributed to America’s success because even though they helped businesses grow and expand, policies such as the Fordney McCumber Act did the most damaged to America’s economy in the long run. I believe that the most important reason for America booming in the 1920s was advertising. Advertising created an increase in employment, as there was an increase in demands for good, the increase in employment increased wages, which caused people to buy more products and so this cycle of prosperity due to advertising continued through out the 1920’s I think that life in the USA got better because of advertising because people had everything they needed to make them happy such as all the consumer goods. People wouldn't have all of these things without advertising as they wouldn’t have known how useful that product could be. Without advertising, mass production wouldn't have been possible as people needed the products that were being produced, businesses wouldn't have grown, the cinema wouldn't be successful and America wouldn’t have boomed. “Advertising makes new thought, new desirers, and new actions. It is the most powerful influence in adapting and changing the habits and the way of life affecting what we eat what we wear and the work and play of the whole nation” (Calvin Coolidge) To me this quote sums up just how important advertising was to the contribution of America’s economic success in the 1920’s

Similar Documents

Free Essay

How Effective Were Mussolinis Economic Policies

... * Russia was very big but there were no effective ways to transport resources around the countries * Poor communication methods * Russification why was there opposition to tsarist rule? * He was a weak tsar as he was primarily reluctant to taking over * Bloody Sunday * 1905 revolution * Failures of the Dumas * Social democratic party, octobrists, social revolutionaries- revolution through peasants * Ignorant and arrogant What was the impact of ww1 on tsarist Russia? * Lack of available infrastructure- basic facilities banks factories ect. * Poor leadership of generals and officers * Poor communication * Incompetent and overconfident officials * Inflation * Middle class discontented as their sons were dying at war * Large life cost why was there a Feb. rev in feb1917 * First WW put pressure on tsarist system * The weather was so bad so trains wouldn’t function and no import/export * Prices rose and rationing led to further discontent * Series of strikes * Famines and poverty getting worse * ARMY DESERTED THE TSAR WHERAS PRIOR TO THIS HE WAS SUPPORTED BY THEM I.E THROUGHOUT BLOODY SUNDAY RUSSO-JAPANESE * Tsarina Alexandra What were the successes and failures of the provisional government? * They were an unelected body and didn’t represent the people of Russia * THEY DID NOT END THE WAR * Peasants were looting properties of landlords ......

Words: 1198 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

How Far Were the Actions of the African Americans the Main Reason for the Advancement of the Civil Rights in the Period 1865-1980?

...How far were the actions of the African Americans the main reason for the advancement of the Civil Rights in the period 1865-1980? “Power concedes nothing without demand, it never has and it never will”[1]. Said by Fredrick Douglass in 1857, an escaped slave who had bearded the brunt of the slave years. He had come to the realisation that African Americans had a fountain of “power”; however that power that they possessed would never establish anything without a “demand”. Fredrick Douglass awoke the conscious of African Americans to make them realise that wanting to be free and wanting to achieve full civil rights was not enough, neither was enduring a life under white supremacy waiting for life after death to see a new dawn .Believing and hoping was not enough. “Power concedes nothing without demand” the solution is to be willing to work hard to establish it yourself by demanding what belongs to them. However using power in order to concede civil rights was a struggle which was acknowledged by Fredrick Douglass “Without struggle there is no success”. To achieve advancement in African American Civil Rights, African Americans had to undergo a process of struggle. A rainbow is not made without rain; you can not want rain without thunder and lightening being accompanied by it. To achieve full civil rights African Americans had to pay the price along the way which was persecution, de-humanisation and scrutiny. Martin Luther King being inspired by Fredrick Douglass said......

Words: 4801 - Pages: 20

Free Essay

Were Usa Prosperous in 1920's

...To What Extent was The Untied States of America Prosperous and United in the 1920’s? America was not prosperous or united during the 1920’s. Although there were reasons to show that The United States were prosperous during this time, there are stronger arguments and ‘harder’ evidence to show that most of population were neither prosperous nor united. These arguments are, the collapse of the American economy in the late 1920’s and the countries economical situation, prohibition and the truth in society a large part of this being racism. There are signs of prosperity and unity in the 1920’s for the Americans; evidence of prosperity is that sales in radios went from 60,000 to 10,000,000 this wasn’t because they were a necessity it was because they could be bought, a statement of wealth. Woodrow Wilson started progresism. Henry Ford made the model T car the first mass produced. They went from $3 billion in debt to $3 billion in profit. Businesses were averaging 80% profits. This all sounds fantastic and how does this mean there was no prosperity or unity? Maybe America was dancing on a volcano that they weren’t prepared to erupt. Late October 1929 the American economy collapses. From a massive high to major low, politicians claimed “Invincibility,” “Untouchable” and “On a Permanent High,” days before the crash. Surely a country cannot be prosperous when they go into recession or when there economy collapses. The economy collapsed mainly due to the fact that America went into......

Words: 1714 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

How Succesful Were the Nazi Economic Policies in the Years 1933 - 1945?

...During the years 1933 – 1945, Hitler and the Nazi party introduced various policies in which impacted the economy, is it necessary to label them all a success? The most successive policy that they announced was those in which was led by Albert Speer, this had a great influence on both the economy and the final stages of war; despite Germany being unsuccessful. The first policy that was introduced was the “New plan” which was created by Hjalmar Schacht in the year 1933. Schacht intended to reduce imports, reduce unemployment, create agreements with other nations and finally channel the government’s spending. In some perspective, the “New plan” was a success; unemployment had decreased significantly, it was reduced from 6 million in 1933 to 300,000 by 1939. Moreover, industrial production had rose considerably in comparison with Weimar Germany before the Wall Street Crash. Due to these factors, it can be interpreted as a great success however, there are features that hinder it. Firstly, Germany were still importing a huge amount of their produce, they failed to produce the same amount of money that they were spending; by 1939 the German government were in debt of 40 million Reichmarks. As a result of this, the new plan cannot be labelled as a great success, however there were aspects that influenced the success of other policies. As the war drew closer, Hitler was aware that the country was not prepared for confrontation therefore he advised his Nazi associate – Goering,......

Words: 994 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

How Far Do You Agree That the Main Reason for the Fall of the Provisional Government Was the Skill and Determination of Lenin in 1917?

...determination as leader of the Bolsheviks was the main reason for the overthrow of the Provisional government. Although, there are significant other factors that contributed to the downfall of the government, such as the weakness the government it in itself possessed, the misjudgment and mistakes it made, and other contributing factors, such as the influential role of Trotsky, which helped impact on the eventual overthrow of the government. Evidence suggests that one of the main reasons for the fall of the Provisional government, was the weaknesses it in itself possessed. For example, the dual authority government can be seen as a weakness because it was not an elected body, and came into being as a rebellious committee of the old duma, refusing to disband at the Tsar's order. This meant it consequently lacked legitimate authority as a result. It had no constitutional claim upon the loyalty of Russian people and no natural fund of good will to rely on, meaning it was judged entirely on how it dealt with the nations problems, making it vulnerable from the start. Its second major weakness was that its authority was limited by its unofficial partnership with the Petrograd Soviet. To begin with there was considerable co-operation between the two, with some people (e.g.- Kerensky) being members of both bodies. The soviet did not set out to be an alternative government, and regarded its role as supervisory, checking that the interests of the people were fully understood by the......

Words: 2202 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

America's Political Parties

...America’s Political Parties Crystal Ann Smith Leah Raby POL110: United States Government 03/17/2014 Politics The two major political parties in the United States today are the Democratic and the Republican parties. They share the meaning to the way the political and presidential system should be run but are how different are they? One of the main differences between the two is that Democrats are Liberals and Republicans are Conservative but how is there a homeostasis between the two and why is there no real middle ground? The following information will explain in depth the differences between the liberals and conservatives as well as the campaign process in maintaining the two and the reason why there is only a two-party system. History and Current State The Democratic Party can be traced back to before America’s independence from Britain and is the oldest political party that has existed. It was formed in 1792 under Thomas Jefferson and established under the presidency of Andrew Jackson in the 1830’s but democracy has come a long way from that. Now the democrat party’s philosophy is labeled as the Liberal in which the supporters focus on ideas of liberty and equality and support current issues such as free and fair elections, civil rights, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free trade and private property.( McGowan, 2007) The Republican Party is the second oldest political party in the United States and was first established with Abraham Lincoln......

Words: 1404 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

How Far Were Divisions over the Continuation of the New Economic Policy Responsible for the Outcome of the Responsible for the Outcome of the Power Struggle in the Ears 1924-1929?

...How far were divisions over the continuation of the New Economic Policy responsible for the outcome of the responsible for the outcome of the power struggle in the ears 1924-1929? NEP (New Economic Policy) was created on the 21st March 1921(till 1922) was deemed after the Russian civil war, it represented more a Capitalism economy than a communist one. NEP was a solution to the problems which were faced by War communism. Introduced in 1918 War communism was used to replace the system of state capitalism. It was mainly enforced by the Cheka and Red Army, it led to a deprived industry with a lack of resources and workers and a famine in 1929 with attack on agriculture. This led to uprisings, most infamous was the Konstadt rising of 1921. The Kronstadts originally were strong supporters of the Bolsheviks however they saw of the oppression of War communism as unfair. The result was 60, 000 ordered by Trotsky to attack the Konstadt base. The uprising was supressed. Lenin took the lesson of the Kronstadt to heat and to avoid public embarrassment he decided it was time to end war communism and lead towards more to NEP. At the Tenth Conference of the Communist Party, which opened in March 1929 Lenin announced that the Kronstadt rising had lit “lit up like a lightning flash”. Therefore NEP was introduced as a temporary matter to solve the problem of famine and Bolshevik opposition. However NEP managed to cause divisions in the party between the left and right. I would say NEP was an...

Words: 1918 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

How Successful Were Stalin's Economic Policies

...How successful were Stalin's economic policies? Stalin introduced the Five Year Plans and collectivisation as his economic policies to improve Russia's industrial backwardness. Collectivisation consisted of state controlled farms, as 90% of the produce would go to the state. The peasants would join their small individual plots to form communal farms, leading to larger amounts of food. The five year plans were aimed at industrial improvements in agriculture and factories. In purely economic terms, his policies were a success they provided a number of solutions to problems like the state's inability to afford to pay high prices for grain. The Five Year Plans built vast factories in places like Stalingrad, Leningrad and other cities across Russia. These improved the production output a lot with coal production jumping from 35.4 million tonnes in the 1927-1928 years to 128 million tonnes in 1937. Hydro-electric dams, canals, railways and other infrastructural projects took place, aiming to modernise Russia. This also helped Russia catch up with countries like Britain, USA and and Germany. As Stalin had warned in February 1931 "We are 50-100 years behind the advanced countries. We must make good this lag in ten years. If we don't do it, they'll crush us!". Other than act as propaganda for the Communists by suggesting they could be crushed by foreigners it shows that Stalin's polices were a success in industry terms. Russian life had drastically changed from living in......

Words: 714 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

How Far Do You Agree That Lenin’s Leadership Was the Main Reason for Why the Bolsheviks Were Able to Seize Power in 1917.

...How far do you agree that Lenin’s leadership was the main reason for why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power in 1917. Lenin was a very significant figure during the Russian revolution, under his strong leadership and the advice of some of his advisors, Lenin helped the Bolsheviks come to power. However I would not agree that his leadership was the main reason to why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power as factors such as the weakness of the provisional government, the home front and most importantly Trotsky role all played a significant role to why the Bolsheviks were successful. Lenin’s leadership played a significant role to why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power in 1917 due to his clear and persuading aims. Lenin was an influential figure in the eyes of the proletariat. Due to the April thesis clear aims resulted in that he was able to gain greater support and he succeeded in having 200,000 members. The vast amount of members meant that the Bolsheviks had greater support when it came to seizing power. The main aims of the April theses were, Peace, Land and Bread and power to the soviets. Many supported the idea of Peace, Land and bread as they were fed up with the affect the war was having on them and wanted to bring it to an end, people were also starving due to the war and therefore welcomed the idea of Peace, Land and bread. Lenin also promised the confiscation of landed estates from landowners and the aristocracy. The slogan all power to the soviets......

Words: 1325 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

How Far Were the Policies of the Republican Party the Main Reason for America’s Economic Success in the 1920’s

...How far were the policies of the Republican Party the main reason for America’s economic success in the 1920’s [50 marks] Although America remained neutral and did not join World War One until 1917, they were already increasing their country’s profits by selling goods such as: weapons, food, equipment and other ammunition to both sides of the war. During World War One, as well as selling goods, America became ‘the banker’ to the rest of the world: loaning countries money at a very high interest. According to the First World War commissions “Britain, France and Italy owed the USA $22 billion plus interest”, this is showing that USA was at a very stable place financially even before the 1920s began. When the war ended Woodrow Wilson put forward his 14 Points which included a League of Nations. The League of Nations’ overall aim was to prevent war from breaking out again. America’s congress at the time decided that it would be best for America in the long run not to join the League of Nations because, congress believed that the USA should not interfere in any European or world affairs. Refusal to join the League of Nations made America an isolationist country. When Warren G. Harding won the presidential election and became president in 1921 a political party called the Republicans took over from the Democrats and the American government. 1920s America was known as the ‘Roaring twenties’ because of the entertainment and the crazes sweeping the country. There were lots......

Words: 2565 - Pages: 11

Free Essay

Economic Success Was the Most Important Reason for Conservative Electoral Dominance in the Period from 1951 to 1964.’ How Far Do You Agree?

...dominance was the domestic policy of housing, however, this would not have been possible without the introduction of the economic policy of credit. Therefore, it was the economic policies under the Conservatives, which were the most important reason for their dominance. The introduction of credit was an intricate part of their dominance, allowing money to be borrowed on ‘easy-terms,’ designed to stimulate a sluggish economy, its success can be shown through the sale of cars, which quadrupled from 1.5 million to 5.5 million. This won votes with the electorate since it supported Churchill’s initial claim when the Conservatives came into power that they would put the welfare of the people at the centre of their policies. It also continued the social mobility that had occurred since the war, closing the gap between the ‘haves and the haves not,’ as Butler suggested. However, it could be argued that the Conservative’s economic policies were not as successful as they appeared and were not the basis for Conservative dominance, since the British economy was sluggish with only a GDP of 2.3% in comparison with the 5.6% GDP of the EEC country of Italy. However, it should be noted that the veil of respectability credit provided the economy meant that the electorate were not aware of the lower GDP. Moreover, Britain was not in decline, since there was growth, which in self was a success compared with the not too distant times of war austerity, therefore its success can be linked with......

Words: 878 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

How Far Do You Agree That Stalin’s Ability to Manipulate the Party Machine Was the Key to His Success in the Leadership Struggle?

...How far do you agree that Stalin’s ability to manipulate the party machine was the key to his success in the leadership struggle? Following Lenin’s death in 1924, the Communist party and their leadership over Russia was set into disarray. Many different ideals and views about the future of Socialism were unveiled and adapted over and through this ideological confusion; with various contenders for the party leader emerged. Throughout 1924-1929, in which a turbulent period of struggle occurred in the power vacuum post-lenin. Stalin eventually emerged as the successful new leader of the USSR. Stalin’s position as General Secretary of the party, among other factors His ability to manipulate the party machine through his position as General Secretary would eventually enable him to become the leader. Stalin’s position of General Secretary allowed him to use and abuse Lenin’s systems to get to the top. Stalin had the power to control what was discussed and how politburo decisions were to be carried out, and he had the significant influence of patronage. This allowed him to access every strand of the Communist party – the orgburo, politburo, and secretariat. His power of patronage allowed him to use his authority to place his most reliable supporters in key and enviable positions within the party. As a result, these people were extremely loyal to Stalin since they effectively owed their place to him, and so therefore he could count on their support. These appointed people......

Words: 1411 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

How Far Do You Agree That the Main Reason for the Survival of Weimar Government 1919 – 1923 Was the Weakness of Its Opponents?

...How far do you agree that the main reason for the survival of Weimar government 1919 – 1923 was the weakness of its opponents? (30 Marks) The reason for the survival of the Weimar Republic can be shifted onto many factors such as the weakness of the opposition. The opposition can be said to be clearly shown through the the Munich Putsch in which there is clear evidence of movements against the government. However, this opposition never managed to over come the army and freikorps who through the Ebert-Groener pact pledged their commitment to support the Weimar Government. However, this may not be the main reason for the governments survival between 1919-1923 as other factors can be said to have influenced the survival of the government such as the accomplishments from Stresemann and Dawes who were the chancellor of Germany and the American budget director respectively. Their joint effort ensured the recovery of the German economy which was collapsing. This work can therefore be said to be a major factor for the survival of the government but to what extent it can be called the main reason must be explored. To an extent it can be argued that the main reason for the survival of the Weimar government in the year 1919-1923 was the weakness of its opponents due to the success the government had in eradicating the multiple attempts to overthrow them, that were attempted in the Munich putsch and the Kapp Putsch. Firstly, the Munich Putsch can be seen as a clear showing of the......

Words: 888 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

‘the Main Reason Why Edward and Mary’s Religious Settlements Had Limited Success Was Because Their Reigns Were so Short.’ How Far Do You Agree with This Statement?

...‘The main reason why Edward and Mary’s religious settlements had limited success was because their reigns were so short.’ How far do you agree with this statement? Jake Nicholls To an extent I do agree with this statement as Edward a devout protestant took England to the most protestant it has ever experienced this is also the same for Mary who restored the country to papal supremacy. However, due to the rebellion and opposition each of these monarchs received it hindered the complete success of their religious settlements. Edward VI, reigned for a total of six years, however what limited Edward even further is the fact he didn’t even reach the age of majority (which had been reduced to the age of sixteen) by the time of his death in 1553, which significantly reduced his level of religious influence. Perhaps if he reached the age of majority he would have brought in more extreme protestant reforms than those of his regents, this might be explained by his upbringing as his step mother Catherine Parr was a protestant therefore provided him with reformist tutors. This shows that due to his short reign it limited the success of Edward’s religious settlement. Furthermore, Edward’s issue of not providing an heir can be blamed upon his short reign, as he was only fifteen when he died. If he had produced an heir it would have meant that his Religious settlement would have been inherited and it would have been likely his heir would have been brought up a devout protestant,......

Words: 816 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Assess the View That the Impact of the First World War Was the Main Reason for the Booming Economy in the Usa in the 1920’s.

...analysis of the interpretations as well as use of my own knowledge, I have reached the conclusion that the war was indeed the main reason why the economy boomed in 1920’s America. The interpretations that support this are A, B and C. While certainly there are other factors that are presented in all of the interpretations, I believe that the prominence of the war throughout these 3 passages support the strength of the argument. Interpretation D attributes Andrew Mellon as the main reason for the boom, but as Cannadine is the only one to do so this limits the strength of his argument. The war was the main cause of the boom as it provided the catalyst necessary to start of a chain of events that provided a huge boost to the economy. Without World War I, it could be argued that the American economy would not have boomed to the extent that it did in the 1920’s. One of the main reasons for this school of thought is an argument provided in interpretation A. Jim potter states that World War I provided an ‘impetus both to agricultural and industrial expansion’. This was because of the fact that the war brought in a need for armaments and munitions to supply the forces with, and there were many countries that could not yield the materials and products due to their lacklustre industry. America was not like these countries, and with the stimulus of the war they were able to quickly improve their industries and make these new products. As a result of this, as the historian Gary......

Words: 1935 - Pages: 8