Free Essay

How I Treat Eatl

In: Science

Submitted By etmberi2001
Words 9183
Pages 37
From by guest on March 10, 2015. For personal use only.

How I treat

How I treat enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma
Antonio Di Sabatino,1 Federico Biagi,1 Paolo G. Gobbi,1 and Gino R. Corazza1
1First Department of Medicine, Centro per lo Studio e la Cura della Malattia Celiaca, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Policlinico S. Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy

Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (EATL) is a complication of celiac disease (CD). This tumor derives from the neoplastic transformation of aberrant intraepithelial T lymphocytes emerging in celiac patients unresponsive to a gluten-free diet. Poor adherence to a gluten-free diet, HLA-DQ2 homozygosity, and late diagnosis of CD are recognized as risk factors

for malignant evolution of CD. Recurrence of diarrhea, unexplained weight loss, abdominal pain, fever, and night sweating should alert physicians to this complication. The suspicion of EATL should lead to an extensive diagnostic workup in which magnetic resonance enteroclysis, positron emission tomography scan, and histologic identification of

lesions represent the best options. Treatment includes high-dose chemotherapy preceded by surgical resection and followed by autologous stem cell transplantation, although biologic therapies seem to be promising. Strict adherence to a gluten-free diet remains the only way to prevent EATL. (Blood. 2012;119(11): 2458-2468)

Celiac disease (CD) is a chronic gluten-sensitive enteropathy characterized by a high prevalence in the general population and an increased mortality.1,2 It is well known that the increased mortality is mainly the result of the complications of CD itself, represented by refractory CD (RCD) and enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (EATL).2 RCD is a form of CD that does not respond histologically to at least 12 months of a strict gluten-free diet (GFD).3 RCD can also evolve in patients who initially responded normally to a GFD and who are still maintaining a strict GFD. On the basis of the intraepithelial lymphocyte (IEL) population, RCD is further classified into type 1 and type 2. RCD type 1 (RCD1) is characterized by persisting villous atrophy despite a strict GFD associated with increased but still phenotypically normal IELs. Conversely, a clonal expansion of abnormal IELs lacking surface CD3, CD8, and T-cell receptor (TCR) markers but expressing intracellular CD3 indicates RCD type 2 (RCD2), a condition that frequently evolves into EATL, the most serious complication of CD.4 In the past, up to 20% of celiac patients were considered to be affected by a nonresponsive form of CD. This was obviously because of the lack of consensus on the definition of nonresponsiveness.4 In the last few years, some evidence has suggested that the prevalence of RCD is low, ranging from 0.6% to 1.5%.3,5,6 Although the presence of RCD in CD is probably to be approximately 1%, the prevalence of RCD2 among patients with RCD is far from being ascertained. Probably because of not only the great differences in the diagnostic criteria,4 but also referral bias, different papers report very different results, which vary from 15% to 75%.7-9 Finally, although the incidence of EATL was reported to be rare in the general population (1 per million person-years),10,11 it was shown that it occurs in 60% to 80% of patients with RCD2 within 5 years.7-9,12 The description of EATL arising in patients with RCD1 seems to be exceptional.7 Recent evidence suggests that non-EATLs, including intestinal B-cell and extraintestinal T-cell lymphomas, may rarely occur in celiac patients.13,14 As far as the prognosis of all these conditions is concerned, there are no doubts that it is much worse than that of uncomplicated CD.2,15 The 5-year survival rate is reported to be between 80% and 96% in patients with RCD1, but it is only between 40% and 58% in patients with RCD2.6-8,15 Five-year survival dropped to between 8% and 20% in RCD2 patients who developed EATL.8,9,16

Natural history
The first paper suggesting that CD predisposes to intestinal lymphoma was published 50 years ago,17 and 5 years ago it was shown that EATL is strongly linked to CD.18 In the last few years, it has emerged that several factors increase the risk of developing malignant complications in patients with CD. This is the case for not only poor adherence to a GFD but also advanced age at diagnosis ( 50 years), diagnostic delay for CD ( 10 years), and HLA-DQ2 homozygosity.2,19 Moreover, we have recently hypothesized that the total amount of gluten consumed not only after but also before the start of a GFD could play a role in inducing celiac complications.2 It should, however, be noted that most of the evidence supporting a protective effect of a GFD is indirect and that studies directly testing this hypothesis are scarce. Hence, it follows that this is an area that needs further study with regard to subgroups of CD patients and subgroups of lymphoma. Although some celiac patients complicating directly into EATL have been described,12 most of the time celiac complications arise as either RCD1 or RCD2. Some patients can also develop ulcerative jejunoileitis (UJI), a premalignant small bowel disorder that shares many immunopathologic features with RCD2 and is characterized by multiple ulcerations evolving in strictures of the intestinal wall.20,21 Both RCD2 and UJI can subsequently degenerate into EATL20,21 through a progressive accumulation in the intestinal epithelium of aberrant (CD3 , CD103 , CD8 , CD4 , TCR) and clonal (restricted rearrangements of TCR- chain)

Submitted October 12, 2011; accepted January 17, 2012. Prepublished online as Blood First Edition paper, January 23, 2012; DOI 10.1182/blood-2011-10385559.

© 2012 by The American Society of Hematology



From by guest on March 10, 2015. For personal use only.

Figure 1. Schematic representation of IL-15 lymphomagenic action leading to the emergence of EATL in CD. In active CD mucosa, IL-15, mainly produced by epithelial cells and dendritic cells (DCs), which present tissue transglutaminase (tTG)–deamidated gluten peptides to T cells in the context of HLA-DQ2 or HLA-DQ8 molecules, promotes the IEL cytotoxicity against epithelial cells by activating the perforin/granzyme system and favoring the interaction between the homodimeric NK activating receptor NFG2D and the major histocompatibility complex class I–related ligands (MIC), thus leading to enterocyte apoptosis. In addition, IL-15 inhibits IEL apoptosis, thus favoring the emergence of neoplastic IEL clonal proliferations, leading to the development of EATL. Activated gluten-reactive T helper cell type 1 cells (Th1) produce high levels of the proinflammatory cytokine IFN- , which contributes to the mucosal damage by further activating the cytotoxicity of IELs against enterocytes.

IELs,22 abnormally expanded by the antiapoptotic action of IL-15 (Figure 1).23,24 As far as we know, it is not clear whether RCD1 and RCD2 are 2 different phases of the same condition or 2 independent conditions. Because a progression of RCD1 into RCD2 has been described in only 2 patients9 and EATL has been described in only 2 patients with RCD1,7 RCD1 and RCD2 may be 2 unrelated conditions.

Clinical presentation

EATL manifests in adult patients with previously diagnosed CD, successfully treated until then with a strict GFD (secondary EATL), as an exacerbation of the classic symptoms of CD, such as abdominal pain, diarrhea, and unexplained weight loss.1 The concomitant presence of fever and night sweating, together with laboratory parameters indicative for hypoalbuminemia, anemia, and increased lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), should alert physicians to this complication. The median age at diagnosis of EATL is 60 years, with similar frequency between men and women. On the other hand, EATL may also arise in patients without a known history of CD and on a gluten-containing diet (primary EATL), and in these cases the diagnosis is more difficult and delayed because of the low specificity of symptoms and a very low index of clinical suspicion.16 In the subjects with EATL identified before CD has been diagnosed, the link between CD and EATL may be suggested by the detection of CD-specific antibodies (either antiendomysial or antitransglutaminase), although the latter often disappear once the refractory state is fully developed.7,15 Because EATL may be complicated by gastrointestinal perforation, obstruction, or hemorrhage, many EATLs are diagnosed at laparotomy. At gross examination, EATL appears as a massive tumor infiltration, which may be transparietal, with ulcerations and induration of the intestinal wall. Up to 25% of cases have a

multifocal presentation, and the proximal small bowel, particularly the jejunum, is a more common localization than the large bowel or rectum.25 There are reports of an association between EATL and peripheral eosinophilia,26 mesenteric lymph node cavitation,27 or splenic atrophy,28 the latter of which may increase susceptibility to severe infections or sepsis.29 Malnutrition is a common feature, especially when EATL has an insidious and chronic presentation or manifests after a long-standing RCD.16 Extraintestinal presentation of EATL is rare, and there is a lack of data on the precise characteristics of its cutaneous, neuromeningeal, or pulmonary manifestations. Systemic or B symptoms,30 such as fever of no evident cause, night sweats, and weight loss of more than 10% of body weight, should be taken as signs of clinical progression, although they occur in less than 30% of EATLs.16,31 A high level of clinical suspicion for an overt lymphoma should lead to an extensive workup, including abdominal imaging, endoscopy, and histologic examination of gut biopsies (Figure 2). Laparotomy with collection of full-thickness biopsy specimens may be necessary in some cases.

Staging procedures as recommended for lymphoma, such as bone marrow examination, CT scan of the thorax, and sonography of the neck, are required for therapeutic decision-making. However, classic lymphoma staging systems32,33 have failed in providing adequate prognostic treatment guidance in patients with EATL. The Lugano system30 is the staging method commonly used for intestinal lymphoma, although its prognostic value in EATL is uncertain. The Prognostic Index for Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma34 was more predictive of survival than the International Prognostic Index,33 as 3 of the 5 components of the latter (ie, tumor stage, age, and number of extranodal sites) were irrelevant for EATL prognosis. Conversely, risk factors identified through the Prognostic Index for Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (ie, tumor size 5 cm, nonambulatory performance status, and raised C-reactive protein and LDH levels) were found to be significantly associated with a worse

From by guest on March 10, 2015. For personal use only.
2460 DI SABATINO et al BLOOD, 15 MARCH 2012 VOLUME 119, NUMBER 11

Figure 2. Proposed diagnostic algorithm in EATL. The recurrence of celiac symptoms in a patient with CD under GFD, or the persistence of celiac symptoms in a recently diagnosed CD patient despite a GFD followed for more than 12 months, should raise the suspicion of RCD. In that case, the compliance to GFD should be ascertained, and, if sufficient, patients should undergo upper endoscopy with collection of duodenal biopsies. A rate of more than 20% of aberrant IELs, assessed by flow cytometric analysis of freshly isolated cells, points toward a diagnosis of RCD2. In that case, EATL should be excluded through both imaging (either MR enteroclysis or CT scan together with PET scan) and double-balloon endoscopy with collection of small bowel biopsies. The occurrence of celiac and B symptoms (fever of no evident cause, night sweats, and weight loss of 10% of body weight) in a patient without a known history of CD and on gluten-containing diet (primary EATL) or the co-occurrence of B symptoms and cachexia in the 2 aforementioned patient subsets suspected to be refractory (secondary EATL) should raise the suspicion of EATL. In that case, patients should undergo both upper endoscopy and double-balloon enteroscopy with collection of small bowel biopsies and imaging procedures (either MR enteroclysis or CT scan together with PET scan). In the case of EATL confirmation, a staging should be performed through bone marrow examination, CT scan of the thorax, and sonography of the neck.

From by guest on March 10, 2015. For personal use only.

Figure 3. Features of EATL at PET scan. Intensely increased 18F-FDG-PET uptake areas (arrows) are evident on axial, sagittal, and coronal images of the small bowel of a patient with EATL.

overall survival and failure-free survival in patients with EATL.34 A preliminary report35 identified 3 risk factors predictive for survival in a multivariate analysis (ie, raised LDH, presence of Bsymptoms, and secondary EATL). This new prognostic model showed superior predictive capacity compared with the International Prognostic Index and made it possible to identify a high-risk group needing more aggressive therapies. It must be stressed, however, that all these prognostic studies were performed on patient series, which were either very heterogeneous or very small, besides being treated without intensified chemotherapy, and in a pre-autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation era. Thus, they can be of little help in selecting modern treatments.
Imaging and endoscopy

diagnostic accuracy of MR enteroclysis in detecting RCD2 or EATL was estimated to be almost 90%.42 Diagnostic accuracy can be further improved by wireless capsule endoscopy, which makes it possible to assess the extent of small bowel involvement and the presence of ulcerations, and is also a well-tolerated procedure, although contraindicated in case of suspected strictures.43 Double-balloon enteroscopy may allow a definitive diagnosis of EATL thanks to the collection of biopsy specimens.44 A recent study45 has shown that double-balloon enteroscopy is able to identify even diminutive small bowel lesions (ie, multiple polyps, fine granular mucosa, and swollen folds), thus suggesting a promising role for this technique in diagnosing EATL at an early stage.

Although new imaging (MR enteroclysis, PET scan) and endoscopic techniques (wireless capsule endoscopy, double-balloon enteroscopy) able to visualize the entire small bowel are currently available,36 the exact diagnostic algorithm in EATL is still unclear because of the lack of studies aimed at comparing the accuracy of the different diagnostic modalities.37 Abdominal CT scan has a higher accuracy than small bowel enema in detecting EATL, which appears as a thickened small bowel loop with possible signs of mucosal ulcerations. Moreover, CT scan permits the visualization of extraintestinal findings, and it was proposed that the detection of bowel wall thickening, mesenteric lymph node cavitation, intussusception, and small-sized spleen ( 120 cm3) should raise suspicion for RCD2 or EATL.38 PET scan has a high sensitivity in detecting EATL (Figure 3),39 but active peristalsis and inflammation may affect its specificity.40 MR imaging is particularly useful in detecting EATL confined to the epithelial layer of the bowel wall or multifocal, and in assessing the response to treatment.41 The

Histologic examination of small intestinal biopsies remains crucial in the diagnostic workup of EATL. Two different types of EATL are recognized on the basis of the specific immunophenotype: EATL type 1, which is characterized by CD56 negativity; and EATL type 2, which shows CD56 expression.18 EATL type 1, which is more frequent than EATL type 2 and is the only one associated with CD, is composed of CD3 ,CD4 , CD8 ,CD5 , CD7 ,CD103 ,CD56 ,TCR / cells, which mostly express CD30. The cytotoxic phenotype of EATL type 1 cells, which are perforin , granzyme B , and TIA-1 , reflects the origin of the tumor from cytotoxic IELs.46,47 EATL type 1 mostly consists of medium-sized to large tumor cells with round or angulated vesicular nuclei, prominent nucleoli, and pale-staining cytoplasm and an increased mitotic index, often associated with a moderate to abundant infiltrate of eosinophils, histiocytes, and small lymphocytes (Figure 4A-C).25 The neighboring mucosa shows histologic features of active CD, such as

From by guest on March 10, 2015. For personal use only.
2462 DI SABATINO et al BLOOD, 15 MARCH 2012 VOLUME 119, NUMBER 11

Figure 4. Histologic features of EATL. Medium-sized to large tumor cells with hyperchromatic nuclei, prominent nucleoli, and moderate to abundant, pale-staining cytoplasm, intermingled with eosinophils, are evident in the small bowel tissue specimen of a patient with EATL (A: H&E stain, original magnification 100). The lesion is characterized by a considerable proportion of CD3-positive cells (B: CD3 immunostain, original magnification 40) and a high proliferative rate (C: Ki-67 immunostain, original magnification 40). At a lower magnification (D: H&E stain, original magnification 20), it can be seen that the mucosa adjacent to the tumor shows histologic features of active CD, such as crypt hyperplasia, increased IEL infiltration, and villous atrophy.

crypt hyperplasia, increased IEL infiltration, and villous atrophy (Figure 4D). EATL type 2 is characterized by a monomorphic infiltrate of small- to medium-sized CD3 ,CD4 , CD8 , CD56 , TCR cells. CD30 is often negative in EATL type 2, and the CD56 positivity suggests that a different mechanism underlies the lymphomagenic process of this tumor, which indeed is less commonly associated with CD.18 A PCR analysis indicative for a monoclonal rearrangement of the TCR- chain on intestinal tissue sections and an immunohistochemical or flow cytometric characterization of IELs indicative for an aberrant T-cell population have a high predictive value in identifying the progression of RCD into EATL48 and therefore can be of help in the diagnostic workup before an overt lymphoma has developed. Among the methods used to detect monoclonal rearrangement of TCR- genes, PCR has the advantage that it can be applied to formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens,49 unlike Southern blotting on extracted DNA, which requires fresh frozen tissue.50 TCR- clonal amplification has been identified in the duodenal biopsies of patients with RCD2 and UJI as in the subsequent tumor specimens.51,52 These findings further strengthen the concept that RCD2 and UJI can be regarded as “cryptic lymphomas” and should encourage performing an extensive diag-

nostic workup to exclude an overt lymphoma in both these premalignant conditions. As far as the analysis of IEL phenotype is concerned, it has been shown that immunohistochemistry allows the discrimination between uncomplicated CD and RCD through the identification in the latter of aberrant IELs expressing a cytoplasmic CD3 chain but lacking CD3 and CD8 surface expression.53 However, flow cytometric analysis of IELs freshly isolated from intestinal biopsy specimens and permeabilized for CD3 cytoplasmic staining seems to be preferable to immunohistochemistry in the discrimination of RCD1 and RCD2 according to the cut-off value of 20% aberrant IELs (cytoplasmic CD3 , surface CD3 , CD7 , CD103 , CD8 , CD4 ) proposed by Verbeek et al,48 although this technique is available only in tertiary referral centers. The main clinical, laboratory, and pathologic parameters, which guide us in the diagnostic management of patients with EATL, are summarized in Table 1.

Homozygosity for HLA-DQ2 (HLA-DB1*02) and allelic variants of the MYO9B gene region have been found to be associated with

From by guest on March 10, 2015. For personal use only.

Table 1. Clinical, laboratory, and pathology findings in EATL
Intestinal symptoms Abdominal pain Diarrhea Systemic or B symptoms Fever Night sweating Unexplained weight loss Gastrointestinal complications Perforation Obstruction Hemorrhage Comorbidity Splenic hypofunction/atrophy Mesenteric lymph node cavitation Severe malnutrition Laboratory findings Anemia Peripheral eosinophilia Low albumin High lactate dehydrogenase Pathology findings CD3 positivity/CD4 negativity High mitotic index Nonmonomorphic infiltrate CD56 negativity CD30 positivity High eosinophils, histiocytes, and small lymphocytes Monoclonal rearrangement of the TCR- chain at PCR analysis

hemorrhage or perforation, which might become higher during chemotherapy or radiotherapy. A complication often represents the revealing event of the underlying lymphoma, and the consequent emergency surgery also has an important diagnostic role.31 A possible drawback of intestinal surgery has been indicated in the delayed start of chemotherapy, especially when postoperative fistulas or infections or problems of wound healing occur. Data from reports on single cases or a few patients would suggest a better prognosis and a minor risk of perforation in patients who have undergone complete resection compared with those who have residual disease.31,58-61
Standard-dose chemotherapy

EATL.54,55 Moreover, data from comparative genomic hybridization studies on tumor DNA suggest that chromosomal gains of 1q and 5q and segmental amplification of 9q or deletion in 16q are associated with EATL.56,57 However, we do not routinely detect these findings in patients with EATL.

A validated standard treatment of EATL in patients with CD is still lacking. The low incidence of this malignancy, the wide spectrum of its clinical presentation, its complex diagnosis, and the frequently poor performance status of the host because of malnutrition hamper the development of prospective controlled or randomized clinical trials.

The therapeutic role of surgery lies in local debulking and in resection of tumor masses with a high risk of obstruction or
Table 2. Results of the treatment with standard-dose chemotherapy

Most of the reports are retrospective, monocentric, and with treatment schedules that have changed over time. The estimated median survival is 7.5 months, whatever the stage of the lymphoma at onset.16,31,58,62-64 Standard-dose multidrug chemotherapy is the treatment most widely used in clinical practice for EATL. However, after the diagnosis has been ascertained, chemotherapy cannot be administered in more than 50% of cases because of low performance status, mainly due to preexisting unresponsive CD, lymphoma dissemination, and frequently advanced age; moreover, a further 50% of those patients who begin chemotherapy are not able to complete it because of complications or disease relapse or iatrogenic toxicity. No more than 35% to 40% of the patients who complete chemotherapy achieve complete remission of the lymphoma16,31,58,63; the overall response rate ranges from 40% to 60%, with a slight and hardly valuable advantage for patients with early-stage lymphoma compared with those with advanced stage disease. The median duration of complete remissions is nearly 6 months,16,64 without any statistically significant difference between clinical stages. The only exception is represented by the 28 cases with EATL of the German Group,63 which showed a median remission duration of 28 months (range, 17-39 months) and a median 2-year survival of 28% (range, 13%-43%) with a clear, though statistically not significant, difference between stages. The CHOP chemotherapy regimen (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) is the one most widely used and generally responsible for an overall 5-year survival of 9% to 22%.16,31,62-64 Many other chemotherapy regimens have been used instead of CHOP (Table 2), such as BACOP (bleomycin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone),62 ProMACEMOPP (prednisone, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, mechlorethamine, vincristine, and procarbazine),62 VAMP (vincristine, doxorubicin, high-dose methotrexate, and prednisolone),16 PEACE-BOM (prednisolone, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide-bleomycin, vincristine, and methotrexate),16 and CHOEP

Study type Retrospective Retrospective Retrospective Retrospective Retrospective Prospective Prospective

Reference No. of patients No. operated No. chemotherapy-treated 62 16 61 31 64 58 63 24 31 1 10 54 23 10 12 25 1 7 49 13 10 11 24 1 10 31 15 10


Overall response (complete response), % NG (NG) 58 (32) 100 (100) NG (50) 32 (32) NG (35) 60 (30)

Median survival, mo (range) 10 (0-196) 7.5 (0-83) 34 5 (1-12) 7 (0-140) 7 (NG) 7 (2-16)

BACOP indicates bleomycin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone; C, complete response; CHOP, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prenisone; CHOEP, same drugs as in CHOP plus etoposide; CT, chemotherapy; Hyper-CVAD: cyclophosphamide, vincristine, dexamethasone, methotrexate, cytarabine; NG, not given; O, overall response; PEACE-BOM, prednisolone, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide-bleomycin, vincristine, methotrexate; ProMACE-MOPP, prednisone, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine; and VAMP, vincristine, doxorubicin, high-dose methotrexate, prednisolone.

From by guest on March 10, 2015. For personal use only.
2464 DI SABATINO et al BLOOD, 15 MARCH 2012 VOLUME 119, NUMBER 11

Table 3. Results of the treatment with high-dose chemotherapy followed by stem cell transplantation
Study type Retrospective Retrospective Retrospective Retrospective Retrospective Retrospective Retrospective Retrospective Retrospective Retrospective Prospective Prospective Prospective Reference 16 69 72 70 66 71 68 65 74 73 67 64 75 (RCD) No. transplanted 2 1 2 1 6 1 4 5 1 2 5 14 13 No. evaluable 2 1 2 1 6 1 4 5 1 0 0 14 13 Debulking chemotherapy PEACE-BOM EPOCH-ICE CHOP, MACOP-B CHOP-ESHAP IVE-HDMTX CHOP CHOP CHOP CHOP PACEB-IVAM-HAM CHOP DACMEMP (or PAEM) CHOP-IVE/MTX Conditioning treatment BEAM MPH-FARA BEAM, BEAM-like MCVC BEAM BEAM BEAM or MPH-FARA BEAM, BEAM-like BEAM BEAM TBI TBI HDCTX HDMPH or BEAM Complete response 2 1 NG 0 5 1 1 NG 1 1 NG 10 5 Median survival, mo (range) 31 (2-64) 11 NG 8 40 (3-52) 18 8 (2-34) 2 (0.5-14) 24 NG NG 60% at 5 y (1-140 ) MPH-FARA 66% at 4 y (10-67) EPOCH-ICE indicates etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide; MPH-FARA, melphalan and fludarabine; MACOP-B, methotrexate, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone, and bleomycin; NG, not given; ESHAP, etoposide, methylprednisolone, cytarabine, and cisplatin; MCVC, ranimustine, carboplatin, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide; IVE-HDMTX, ifosfamide, etoposide, epirubicin, and high-dose methotrexate; PACEB, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, bleomycin, vincristine, and prednisone; IVAM, ifosfamide, etoposide, cytosine arabinoside, and methotrexate; HAM, cytarabine and mitoxantrone; DACMEMP, dexamethasone, cytarabine, carmustine, etoposide, methylprednisolone, and cisplatin; PAEM, cisplatin, cytarabine, etoposide, and methylprednisolone; TBI, total body irradiation; HDCTX, high-dose cyclophosphamide; and HDMPH, high-dose melphalan.

(CHOP plus etoposide).63 All these regimens share 2 to 4 cornerstone drugs present in the CHOP schedule, with proven activity in lymphoproliferative diseases, and their efficacy proves similarly disappointing, with heavier toxicity if dose intensity is increased (BACOP) or other drugs are included (ProMACE-MOPP, PEACE-BOM, and CHOEP). Very few longterm survivors have been reported: 5 patients from the series of Gale et al with survival from 49 to 219 months after CHOP,16 and 1 patient from Honemann et al with persisting complete remission ¨ 34 months after the end of the intensive Hyper-CVAD regimen (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, dexamethasone, methotrexate, and cytarabine).61 These long-term survivors, who often, but not always, present early-stage disease at diagnosis, suggest that a study of the prognostic factors of EATL might be suitable if a sufficiently high number of patients were available. In our experience, patients who fail their first-line CHOP have a very dismal fate with a second-line conventional chemotherapy. In the experience of Raderer et al,59 6 of 19 patients underwent new chemotherapy regimens because of progressive disease or relapse. The regimens used were ICE (ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide) in 2 patients, FC (fludarabine and cyclophosphamide) in another 2 subjects, cladribine in one, and DHAP (dexamethasone, cytarabine, and cisplatin) in the last. Three subjects responded completely (2 to FC and one to ICE), and 2 of them were still alive at 7 and 64 months, respectively; 1 died of disease progression after 10 months. All 3 nonresponders died of perforation within 2 weeks from the start of the second-line therapy.
High-dose chemotherapy with ASCT

The poor results of conventional chemotherapy have stimulated investigation into the feasibility and efficacy of high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). This therapeutic option cannot be proposed to the large majority of patients because of their poor general condition, unresponsiveness to debulking therapy, iatrogenic toxicity and/or complications, or too early relapse. The series with the relatively highest number of treated patients are those by Jantunen et al (5 patients; median survival, 2 months),65 Bishton and Haynes (6 patients; 4 alive and disease-free 2-4 years after treatment,

2 relapsed early),66 Reimer et al (5 patients with EATL, without any specific information, of 83 cases with different T-cell histology, 55 of whom were transplanted),67 and Al-Toma et al (4 patients; 1 had ongoing complete remission 32 months after transplantation, 3 died from relapse within a few months after transplantation).68 Table 3 summarizes all the information available in the literature, including case reports. CHOP was generally used as the first-line chemotherapy and BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and methotrexate) as the conditioning regimen. A novel first-line chemotherapy, consisting of a single course of CHOP plus 6 cycles of alternating IVE (ifosfamide, epirubicin, etoposide) and MTX (intermediate-dose methotrexate), followed by either BEAM or high-dose melphalan with total body irradiation as conditioning regimens, was planned by Sieniawski et al and administered in 26 patients and compared with another 35 who underwent standard chemotherapy or surgery alone.64 The eligibility criteria were de novo onset of the EATL, age of 18 years or older, and estimated ability to tolerate high-dose treatment. The number of patients excluded from the enrollment was not specified, and only 14 of the 26 included in the study actually underwent ASCT. The study was not randomized, but the improvement of 5-year overall survival and progression-free survival was impressive (60% vs 22% and 52% vs 22%, respectively). A single report69 of prolonged complete remission of a refractory EATL after reduced-intensity unrelated cord blood transplantation offers new outlooks on the efficacy of conditioning procedures with lower toxicity and a probable graft-versus-lymphoma activity. On the whole, these studies suggest that those patients who can tolerate more intensive treatments may benefit. We think that high-dose chemotherapy followed by ASCT represents a true landmark in the evolving treatment of EATL, but we recommend a very strict selection of the eligible patients because of their intrinsic frailty.

The administration of radiotherapy is seldom adopted in the treatment of patients with EATL and is reported as an occasional and ancillary measure related to chemotherapy. In the series by Novakovic et al, 6 of the 11 patients who completed the chemotherapy courses (4 with complete remission, 2 with partial response)

From by guest on March 10, 2015. For personal use only.

Figure 5. Main therapeutic options (white areas), 5-year survival, and IEL or infiltrating lymphoma cell immunophenotype (black areas), along the lymphomagenic process leading from uncomplicated CD to EATL through RCD. Unlike RCD1 (RCD1), which can benefit from steroids, such as prednisone or budesonide, combined or not with immunomodulators, such as azathioprine (AZA), 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP), or tacrolimus, RCD2 (RCD2) is less likely to respond to the aforementioned drugs. Therapeutic options in RCD2 may include cladribrine, alemtuzumab (anti-CD52 antibody), or high-dose chemotherapy (high-chemo) followed by ASCT. Standard-chemo indicates standard-dose chemotherapy. Black arrowheads represent probable progression; and white arrowheads, uncertain progression.

were then treated with radiotherapy, and all achieved complete remission.31 In the study reported by Daum et al, none of the patients with EATL was able to receive radiotherapy after chemotherapy, as scheduled, because of progressive disease or complications.58
Novel treatments

An interesting new treatment is alemtuzumab, a monoclonal antibody that targets CD52 on normal and pathologic T lymphocytes. Gallamini et al treated 24 patients with different histologic types of T-cell lymphoma with a combination of CHOP and alemtuzumab.76 The only patient presenting an EATL responded completely, but no information was given about the duration of response. Soldini et al successfully treated a 73-year-old woman with a typical history of CD and subsequent EATL, administering

alemtuzumab in combination with gemcitabine; the patient relapsed one year after and achieved a second durable complete remission with the same combined therapy.77 On the other hand, a gastric EATL in a 72-year-old man, treated by Kircher et al with CHOP plus alemtuzumab, showed an initial promising clinical and radiologic response but then rapidly progressed with a lethal outcome.78 Alemtuzumab was given at 30 mg 3 times a week for 4 consecutive weeks combined with antiviral therapy. Interestingly, alemtuzumab can prevent the risk of developing an EATL in subjects with RCD, as documented by the complete clinical and pathologic recovery of a woman with a 2-year history of RCD.79 Another single experience, however, did not confirm such efficacy.80 The clinical activity of cladribine, a synthetic purine nucleoside with cytotoxic effects, holds promise in the field of RCD and

From by guest on March 10, 2015. For personal use only.
2466 DI SABATINO et al BLOOD, 15 MARCH 2012 VOLUME 119, NUMBER 11

EATL. Cladribine has been used more in RCD2. In this setting of patients, the pilot study by Al-Toma et al recorded 6 of 17 clinical responses, with histologic improvement in 10 of 17 after 1 course of therapy (0.1 mg/kg with a 2-hour infusion daily for 5 days).81 These results were confirmed by Tack et al in 32 patients with RCD2 because 18 of 37 responders had a clearly higher 5-year survival and a decrease transition into EATL compared with nonresponders.82 Patients unresponsive to cladribine can be rescued with high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation.75 No information is available on the use of cladribine in overt EATL apart from the report by Raderer et al regarding a patient with relapsed and unresponsive EATL.59 A complete response, stable 8 months after treatment, was achieved in a patient with EATL also by romidepsin as a single agent, a histone deacetylase inhibitor active in T-cell lymphoma, administered in a phase 2 study83 on different types of T-cell lymphomas. Finally, laboratory studies are ongoing on the activity in vitro and in mice of a fully humanized IL-15 specific antibody (AMG714)24 able to block the signaling pathway by which IL-15 transmits antiapoptotic signals to IELs. It is probable that an antibody like this, which specifically acts on one crucial step of the lymphomagenesis, may be the conclusive weapon against EATL if used in RCD with the aim of preventing the malignant transformation of IELs. Figure 5 summarizes the main therapeutic options we adopt in patients with EATL or RCD.

risk of malignant complications in asymptomatic celiac patients.92 Until these results are confirmed, we strongly recommend that all celiac patients must maintain a strict life-long GFD. In conclusion, EATL is a rare disease with a very poor outcome. Unexplained weight loss, abdominal pain, diarrhea, loss of albumin and blood, increased LDH, fever, and night sweating should alert physicians to this complication in patients with a history of CD or RCD. However, EATL may also be diagnosed in patients without a known history of CD. The suspicion of EATL should lead to an extensive diagnostic workup in which MR enteroclysis, combined with PET scan and histologic identification of lesions, represents the best options. The best current treatment choice is high-dose chemotherapy, preceded by surgical resection and followed by ASCT, although this procedure can only be applied to a strictly selected number of patients able to tolerate it. Further studies are needed to verify whether innovative therapies might be of help in treating or preventing EATL. Strict adherence to a GFD remains the best option to prevent EATL in patients with CD.

The authors thank Dr Vincenzo Villanacci for providing the histologic pictures shown in Figure 4, and the Associazione Italiana Celiachia for supporting them in the study of complicated celiac disease.

Prophylaxis: the role of a gluten-free diet
Adherence to a strict GFD is of paramount importance in reducing the risk of developing CD complications, and its protective effect was shown more than 20 years ago; in the past few years, many papers have addressed this issue, confirming its importance.84-91 However, on the basis of a reduced malignancy risk in asymptomatic celiac patients diagnosed because of familiarity compared with celiac patients diagnosed because of symptoms, it has recently been suggested that there is no evidence that a GFD further reduces the

Contribution: A.D.S., F.B., P.G.G., and G.R.C. synthesized ideas and wrote the paper. Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The authors declare no competing financial interests. Correspondence: Gino R. Corazza, Clinica Medica I, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Policlinico San Matteo, Universita di Pavia, Piazzale Golgi 5, 27100 Pavia, ` Italy; e-mail:

1. Di Sabatino A, Corazza GR. Coeliac disease. Lancet. 2009;373(9785):1480-1493. 2. Biagi F, Corazza GR. Mortality in celiac disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;7(3):158162. 3. Biagi F, Corazza GR. Defining “gluten refractory enteropathy.” Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2001; 13(5):561-565. 4. Malamut G, Cellier C. Is refractory celiac disease more severe in old Europe? Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106(5):929-932. 5. West J. Celiac disease and its complications: a time traveller’s perspective. Gastroenterology. 2009;136(1):32-34. 6. Roshan B, Leffler DA, Jamma S, et al. The incidence and clinical spectrum of refractory celiac disease in a north American referral center. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106(5):923-928. 7. Malamut G, Afchain P, Verkarre V, et al. Presentation and long-term follow-up of refractory celiac disease: comparison of type I with type II. Gastroenterology. 2009;136(1):81-90. 8. Al-Toma A, Verbeek WH, Hadithi M, von Blomberg BM, Mulder CJ. Survival in refractory coeliac disease and enteropathy-associated Tcell lymphoma: retrospective evaluation of singlecentre experience. Gut. 2007;56(10):1373-1378. 9. Daum S, Ipczynski R, Schumann M, Wahnschaffe U, Zeitz M, Ullrich R. High rates of complications and substantial mortality in both types of refractory sprue. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;21(1):66-70. 10. Verbeek WH, Van De Water JM, Al-Toma A, Oudejans JJ, Mulder CJ, Coupe VM. Incidence of ´ enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma: a nation-wide study of a population-based registry in The Netherlands. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2008; 43(11):1322-1328. 11. Shack LG, Wood HE, Kang JY, et al. Small intestinal cancer in England & Wales and Scotland: time trends in incidence, mortality and survival. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;23(9):1297-1306. 12. Rubio-Tapia A, Murray JA. Classification and management of refractory coeliac disease. Gut. 2010;59(4):547-557. 13. Smedby KE, Akerman M, Hildebrand H, Glimelius B, Ekbom A, Askling J. Malignant lymphomas in coeliac disease: evidence of increased risks for lymphoma types other than enteropathytype T cell lymphoma. Gut. 2005;54(1):54-59. 14. Green PH, Fleischauer AT, Bhagat G, Goyal R, Jabri B, Neugut AI. Risk of malignancy in patients with celiac disease. Am J Med. 2003;115(3):191195. 15. Rubio-Tapia A, Kelly DG, Lahr BD, Dogan A, Wu TT, Murray JA. Clinical staging and survival in refractory celiac disease: a single center experience. Gastroenterology. 2009;136(1):99-107. 16. Gale J, Simmonds PD, Mead GM, Sweetenham JW, Wright DH. Enteropathy-type intestinal T-cell lymphoma: clinical features and treatment of 31 patients in a single center. J Clin Oncol. 2000; 18(4):795-803. 17. Gough KR, Read AE, Naish JM. Intestinal reticulosis as a complication of idiopathic steatorrhoea. Gut. 1962;3:232-239. 18. Deleeuw RJ, Zettl A, Klinker E, et al. Wholegenome analysis and HLA genotyping of enteropathy-type T-cell lymphoma reveals 2 distinct lymphoma subtypes. Gastroenterology. 2007; 132(5):1902-1911. 19. Biagi F, Bianchi PI, Vattiato C, et al. Influence of HLA-DQ2 and DQ8 on severity in celiac disease. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012;46(1):46-50. 20. Biagi F, Poggioli G, Mazzoni G, Corazza GR. Intestinal strictures. Lancet. 1998;352(9131):876. 21. Biagi F, Lorenzini P, Corazza GR. Literature review on the clinical relationship between ulcerative jejunoileitis, coeliac disease and enteropathy associated T cell lymphoma. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2000;35(8):785-790. 22. Mention JJ, Ben Ahmed M, Begue B, et al. Inter` leukin 15: a key to disrupted intraepithelial lymphocyte homeostasis and lymphomagenesis in

From by guest on March 10, 2015. For personal use only.

celiac disease. Gastroenterology. 2003;125(3): 730-745. 23. Di Sabatino A, Ciccocioppo R, Cupelli F, et al. Epithelium derived interleukin 15 regulates intraepithelial lymphocyte Th1 cytokine production, cytotoxicity, and survival in coeliac disease. Gut. 2006;55(4):469-477. 24. Malamut G, El Machhour R, Montcuquet N, et al. IL-15 triggers an antiapoptotic pathway in human intraepithelial lymphocytes that is a potential new target in celiac disease-associated inflammation and lymphomagenesis. J Clin Invest. 2010; 120(6):2131-2143. 25. Domizio P, Owen RA, Shepherd NA, Talbot IC, Norton AJ. Primary lymphoma of the small intestine: a clinicopathological study of 119 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1993;17(5):429-442. 26. Hovenga S, de Graaf H, Joosten P, et al. Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma presenting with eosinophilia. Neth J Med. 2003;61(1):25-27. 27. McBride OM, Skipworth RJ, Leitch D, Yalamarthi S. Cavitating mesenteric lymph node syndrome in association with coeliac disease and enteropathy associated T-cell lymphoma: a case report and review of the literature. Case Report Med. 2010;2010:478269. 28. Di Sabatino A, Rosado MM, Cazzola P, et al. Splenic hypofunction and the spectrum of autoimmune and malignant complications in celiac disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4(2):179186. 29. Di Sabatino A, Carsetti R, Corazza GR. Postsplenectomy and hyposplenic state. Lancet. 2011;378(9785):86-97. 30. Rohatiner A, d’Amore F, Coiffier B, et al. Report on a workshop convened to discuss the pathological and staging classifications of gastrointestinal tract lymphoma. Ann Oncol. 1994;5(5):397400. 31. Novakovic BJ, Novakovic S, Frkovic-Grazio S. A single-center report on clinical features and treatment response in patients with intestinal T cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. Oncol Rep. 2006; 16(1):191-195. 32. Musshoff K. Clinical staging classification of nonHodgkin’s lymphomas. Strahlentherapie. 1977; 153(4):218-221. 33. International Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Prognostic Factors Project. A predictive model for aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(14):987-994. 34. Delabie J, Holte H, Vose JM, et al. Enteropathyassociated T-cell lymphoma: clinical and histological findings from the international peripheral Tcell lymphoma project. Blood. 2011;118(1):148155. 35. de Baaij LR, van de Water JM, Verbeek WH, et al. Enteropathy associated T-cell lymphoma: a clinical prognostic model to identify high risk patients. Gastroenterology. 2011;140(suppl 1):A151. 36. Leighton JA. The role of endoscopic imaging of the small bowel in clinical practice. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106(1):27-36. 37. Al-Toma A, Verbeek WH, Mulder CJ. The management of complicated celiac disease. Dig Dis. 2007;25(3):230-236. 38. Mallant M, Hadithi M, Al-Toma AB, et al. Abdominal computed tomography in refractory coeliac disease and enteropathy associated T-cell lymphoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13(11): 1696-1700. 39. Hadithi M, Mallant M, Oudejans J, et al. 18F-FDG PET versus CT for the detection of enteropathyassociated T-cell lymphoma in refractory celiac disease. J Nucl Med. 2006;47(10):1622-1627. 40. Hoffmann M, Vogelsang H, Kletter K, Zettinig G, Chott A, Raderer M. 18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) for assessment of enteropathy-type T cell lymphoma. Gut. 2003;52(3):347-351. 41. Laird J, Leach M, Ballantyne S. The value of

small bowel magnetic resonance imaging in the management of enteropathy associated T-cell lymphoma. Br J Haematol. 2008;142(1):136-137. 42. Van Weyenberg SJ, Meijerink MR, Jacobs MA, van Kuijk C, Mulder CJ, van Waesberghe JH. MR enteroclysis in refractory celiac disease: proposal and validation of a severity scoring system. Radiology. 2011;259(1):151-161. 43. Daum S, Wahnschaffe U, Glasenapp R, et al. Capsule endoscopy in refractory celiac disease. Endoscopy. 2007;39(5):455-458. 44. Hadithi M, Al-Toma A, Oudejans J, van Bodegraven AA, Mulder CJ, Jacobs M. The value of double-balloon enteroscopy in patients with refractory celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(5):987-996. 45. Matsumoto T, Nakamura S, Esaki M, et al. Double-balloon endoscopy depicts diminutive small bowel lesions in gastrointestinal lymphoma. Dig Dis Sci. 2010;55(1):158-165. 46. de Bruin PC, Connolly CE, Oudejans JJ, et al. Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphomas have a cytotoxic T-cell phenotype. Histopathology. 1997; 31(4):313-317. 47. Bagdi E, Diss TC, Munson P, Isaacson PG. Mucosal intra-epithelial lymphocytes in enteropathyassociated T-cell lymphoma, ulcerative jejunitis, and refractory celiac disease constitute a neoplastic population. Blood. 1999;94(1):260-264. 48. Verbeek WH, Goerres MS, von Blomberg BM, et al. Flow cytometric determination of aberrant intra-epithelial lymphocytes predicts T-cell lymphoma development more accurately than T-cell clonality analysis in refractory celiac disease. Clin Immunol. 2008;126(1):48-56. 49. Murray A, Cuevas D, Jones B, Wright DH. Study of the immunohistochemistry and T-cell clonality of enteropathy associated T-cell lymphoma. Am J Pathol. 1995;146(2):509-519. 50. Isaacson PG, O’Connor NTG, Spencer J, et al. Malignant histiocytosis of the intestine: AT-cell lymphoma. Lancet. 1985;2(8457):688-691. 51. Daum S, Weiss D, Hummel M, et al. Frequency of clonal intraepithelial T lymphocyte proliferations in enteropathy-type intestinal T cell lymphoma, coeliac disease, and refractory sprue. Gut. 2001; 49(6):804-812. 52. Cellier C, Delabesse E, Helmer C, et al. Refractory sprue, coeliac disease, and enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma. Lancet. 2000; 356(9225):203-208. 53. Patey-Mariaud D, Serre N, Cellier C, et al. Distinction between coeliac disease and refractory sprue: a simple immunohistochemical method. Histopathology. 2000;37(1):70-77. 54. Al-Toma A, Goerres MS, Meijer JW, Pena AS, ˜ Crusius JB, Mulder CJ. Human leukocyte antigen-DQ2 homozygosity and the development of refractory celiac disease and enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4(3):315-319. 55. Wolters VM, Verbeek WH, Zhernakova A, et al. The MYO9B gene is a strong risk factor for developing refractory celiac disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5(12):1399-1405. 56. Zettl A, Ott G, Makulik A, et al. Chromosomal gains at 9q characterize enteropathy-type T-cell lymphoma. Am J Pathol. 2002;161(5):1635-1645. 57. Baumgartner AK, Zettl A, Chott A, Ott G, ¨ Muller-Hermelink HK, Starostik P. High frequency ¨ of genetic aberrations in enteropathy-type T-cell lymphoma. Lab Invest. 2003;83(10):1509-1516. 58. Daum S, Ullrich R, Heise W, et al. Intestinal nonHodgkin’s lymphoma: a multicenter prospective clinical study from the German Study Group on Intestinal Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(14):2740-2746. 59. Raderer M, Troch M, Kiesewetter B, et al. Second line chemotherapy in patients with enteropathyassociated T cell lymphoma: a retrospective

single center analysis. Ann Hematol. 2012;91(1): 57-61. 60. Ferreri AJ, Zinzani PL, Govi S, Pileri SA. Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2011;79(1):84-90. 61. Honemann D, Prince HM, Hicks RJ, Seymour JF. ¨ Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma without a prior diagnosis of coeliac disease: diagnostic dilemmas and management options. Ann Hematol. 2005;84(2):118-121. 62. Egan LJ, Walsh SV, Stevens FM, Connolly CE, Egan EL, McCarthy CF. Celiac-associated lymphoma: a single institution experience of 30 cases in the combination chemotherapy era. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1995;21(2):123-129. 63. Wohrer S, Chott A, Drach J, et al. Chemotherapy ¨ with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide, vincristine and prednisone (CHOEP) is not effective in patients with enteropathy-type intestinal T-cell lymphoma. Ann Oncol. 2004;15(11):16801683. 64. Sieniawski M, Angamuthu N, Boyd K, et al. Evaluation of enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma comparing standard therapies with a novel regimen including autologous stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2010;115(18):3664-3670. 65. Jantunen E, Juvonen E, Wiklund T, Putkonen M, Nousiainen T. High-dose therapy supported by autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2003;44(12):2163-2164. 66. Bishton MJ, Haynes AP. Combination chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant for enteropathy-associated T cell lymphoma. Br J Haematol. 2007;136(1):111-113. 67. Reimer P, Rudiger T, Geissinger E, et al. Autolo¨ gous stem-cell transplantation as first-line therapy in peripheral T-cell lymphomas: results of a prospective multicenter study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(1):106-113. 68. Al-Toma A, Verbeek WH, Visser OJ, et al. Disappointing outcome of autologous stem cell transplantation for enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma. Dig Liver Dis. 2007;39(7):634-641. 69. Chonabayashi K, Kondo T, Tanaka Y, Ichinohe T, Ishikawa T, Uchiyama T. Sustained complete remission of refractory enteropathy-type T-cell lymphoma following reduced-intensity unrelated cord blood transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2007;40(9):905-906. 70. Okuda M, Nomura J, Tateno H, Kameoka J, Sasaki T. CD56 positive intestinal T-cell lymphoma: treatment with high dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation. Intern Med. 2002;41(9):734-737. 71. Rongey C, Micallef I, Smyrk T, Murray J. Successful treatment of enteropathy-associated T cell lymphoma with autologous stem cell transplant. Dig Dis Sci. 2006;51(6):1082-1086. 72. Blystad AK, Enblad G, Kvalay S, et al. High-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphomas. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2001;27(7):711-716. 73. Prochazka V, Faber E, Raida L, et al. Long-term outcome of patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma treated with first-line intensive chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2011;155(1):63-70. 74. Nava VE, Cohen P, Bishop M, Fowler D, Jaffe ES, Ozdemidi M. Enteropathy-type T-cell lymphoma after intestinal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31(3):476-480. 75. Tack GJ, Wondergem MJ, Al-Toma A, et al. AutoSCT in refractory celiac disease type II patients unresponsive to cladribine therapy. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2011;46(6):840-846. 76. Gallamini A, Zaja F, Patti C, et al. Alemtuzumab

From by guest on March 10, 2015. For personal use only.
2468 DI SABATINO et al BLOOD, 15 MARCH 2012 VOLUME 119, NUMBER 11

(Campath-1H) and CHOP chemotherapy as firstline treatment of peripheral T-cell lymphoma: results of a GITIL (Gruppo Italiano Terapie Innovative nei Linfomi) prospective multicenter trial. Blood. 2007;110(7):2316-2323. 77. Soldini D, Mora O, Cavalli F, Zucca E, Mazzucchelli L. Efficacy of alemtuzumab and gemcitabine in a patient with enteropathy-type T-cell lymphoma. Br J Haematol. 2008;142(3): 484-486. 78. Kircher SM, Gurbuxani S, Smith SM. CHOP plus alemtuzumab can induce metabolic response by FDG-PET but has minimal long-term benefits: a case report and literature review. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2007;38(1):59-62. 79. Vivas S, Ruiz de Morales JM, Ramos F, Suarez-Vilela D. Alemtuzumab for refractory ce´ liac disease in a patient at risk for enteropathyassociated T-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354(23):2514-2515. 80. Verbeek WHM, Mulder CJJ, Zweegman S. Alemtuzumab for refractory celiac disease. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(13):1396-1397. 81. Al-Toma A, Goerres MS, Meijer JW, et al. Cladrib-

ine therapy in refractory celiac disease with aberrant T cells. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006; 4(11):1322-1327. 82. Tack GJ, Verbeek WH, Al-Toma A, et al. Evaluation of cladribine treatment in refractory celiac disease type II. World J Gastroenterol. 2011; 17(4):506-513. 83. Piekarz RL, Frye R, Prince HM, et al. Phase 2 trial of romidepsin in patients with peripheral Tcell lymphoma. Blood. 2011;117(22):5827-5834. 84. Corrao G, Corazza GR, Bagnardi V, et al. Mortality in patients with coeliac disease and their relatives: a cohort study. Lancet. 2001;358(9279): 356-361. 85. Holmes GK, Prior P, Lane MR, Pope D, Allan RN. Malignancy in coeliac disease: effect of a gluten free diet. Gut. 1989;30(3):333-338. 86. Collin P, Reunala T, Pukkala E, Laippala P, Keyrilainen O, Pasternack A. Coeliac disease: ¨ associated disorders and survival. Gut. 1994; 35(9):1215-1218. 87. Peters U, Askling J, Gridley G, Ekbom A, Linet M. Causes of death in patients with celiac disease in

a population-based Swedish cohort. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(13):1566-1572. 88. Viljamaa M, Kaukinen K, Pukkala E, Hervonen K, Reunala T, Collin P. Malignancies and mortality in patients with coeliac disease and dermatitis herpetiformis: 30-year population-based study. Dig Liver Dis. 2006;38(6):374-380. 89. Silano M, Volta U, Vincenzi AD, Dessì M, Vincenzi MD. Effect of a gluten-free diet on the risk of enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma in celiac disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;53(4):972-976. 90. Olen O, Askling J, Ludvigsson JF, Hildebrand H, ´ Ekbom A, Smedby KE. Coeliac disease characteristics, compliance to a gluten free diet and risk of lymphoma by subtype. Dig Liver Dis. 2011; 43(11):862-868. 91. Rampertab SD, Forde KA, Green PH. Small bowel neoplasia in coeliac disease. Gut. 2003; 52(8):1211-1214. 92. Gao Y, Kristinsson SY, Goldin LR, Bjorkholm M, ¨ Caporaso NE, Landgren O. Increased risk for non-Hodgkin lymphoma in individuals with celiac disease and a potential familial association. Gastroenterology. 2009;136(1):91-98.

From by guest on March 10, 2015. For personal use only.

2012 119: 2458-2468 doi:10.1182/blood-2011-10-385559 originally published online January 23, 2012

How I treat enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma
Antonio Di Sabatino, Federico Biagi, Paolo G. Gobbi and Gino R. Corazza

Updated information and services can be found at: Articles on similar topics can be found in the following Blood collections Free Research Articles (3000 articles) How I Treat (148 articles) Lymphoid Neoplasia (1957 articles) Information about reproducing this article in parts or in its entirety may be found online at: Information about ordering reprints may be found online at: Information about subscriptions and ASH membership may be found online at:

Blood (print ISSN 0006-4971, online ISSN 1528-0020), is published weekly by the American Society of Hematology, 2021 L St, NW, Suite 900, Washington DC 20036. Copyright 2011 by The American Society of Hematology; all rights reserved.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Li Ning Case Study

...This calculus of glorified self-interest and the fabrications upon which it is based must be challenged. Henry Mintzberg, Robert Simons and Kunal Basu O n Wall Street, where shareholder "value" is vigorously pursued through ever leaner and meaner organizations, business as usual changed ahruptly on September 11, 2001. Within hours after the tragedy, obsession witb self gave way to serving others. At the very epicenter of self-interest, people became engaged in collective et^brt. There is a message for managemenl in this. Tbe point is not tbat concern lor otbei's is suddenly going to replace self-interest, but that there bas to be a balance between tbe two. The events of September 11 and the following days belped to make evident how out of balance our society has become. The role of management •— responsible management — is to work toward restoration of that balance. urged to ignore broader social responsibilities in favor ol' narrow sbareholder vaiue; chief executives have been regarded as if they alone create economic performance. Meanwhile, concern for the disadvaiKaged — simple, old-fasbioned generosity — has somebow been lost. A society devoid of selfishness is certainly difficult to imagine. But a society tbat glorifies selfishness can be hnagined only as base. Tbe intention here is to challenge such a society — not to deny human nature, but to confront a distorted view of it. In so doing, we wish to promote another characteristic no less human: engageiucut.......

Words: 6505 - Pages: 27