How Successful Was Wolsey’s Foreign Policy in the Years 1515-1525?

In: Historical Events

Submitted By oonaghhughes2
Words 739
Pages 3
How Successful was Wolsey’s Foreign Policy in the Years 1515-1525?
(30 marks)

Wolsey became Henry VIII’s Lord Chancellor in 1515, he was extremely able and determined; his foreign policy was mainly directed at preserving peace and trying to make England a negotiator between other countries. During the years 1515-1525 Wolsey’s power was undisputed, this was due to the fact that Henry VIII delegated more and more state business to Wolsey including near-complete control of England’s foreign policy. The extent of Wolsey’s success can be measured in several ways; these include the financial stability of the country, loyalty from England’s allies and respect for Wolsey (and Henry VIII) from English subjects and foreigners.
Wolsey’s greatest achievement in creating a successful foreign policy was the Treaty of London, in 1518, which was known as a ‘universal’ treaty of peace, it united all of Christendom under Henry VIII’s sponsorship with a mutual non-aggressive pact that provided collective support and aid in the case of conflict. While doing this Wolsey also saw the opportunity to re-unite France and England by betrothing Henry VIII’s first daughter, Mary, to the dauphin (first son of the King), by doing this Wolsey also achieved Tournai for England again for 600,000 crowns. Bishop Fox described Wolsey’s maneuver with France as “The best deed that was ever done for England; and, next to the King, the praise is due to Wolsey”.
Many people have questioned whether Wolsey’s foreign policy was actually his own policy or if Wolsey was simply a pawn for Henry to exploit and use to his every advantage, whereas some others say Wolsey was entirely in control of his correspondence and dealings with other countries and that Henry was not at all controlling Wolsey; I personally believe that Wolsey strived to create a peaceful foreign policy, but Henry yearned for honour and…...

Similar Documents

Do You Agree with the Suggestion in Source N That Henry and Wolsey Conducted an Effective Foreign Policy in the Years 1515-25?

...Do you agree with the suggestion in Source N that Henry and Wolsey conducted an effective foreign policy in the years 1515-25? There are many different interpretations of the effectiveness of the foreign policy in the years 1515-25. Some sources say that it was successful given England's poor resources and Henry's relatively low income and some criticise it and the way Henry and Wolsey conducted it as they think that Henry's aims and ambitions were often unrealistic. Source N suggests that Wolsey and Henry conducted an effective foreign policy. David Grossell says 'Henry and Wolsey did well to preserve an independent and active role and win glory, honour and prestige...'. It shows us that Wolsey was able to direct an effective foreign policy given the circumstances and England's resources. One example of how effective his policy was the Peace of London in 1518 which was one of his greatest achievements. The treaty bound the twenty foremost states in Europe together in a pact of perpetual peace. Wolsey was seen as an architect of the peace and this made London the centre of international relations and also England was no longer under threat of diplomatic isolation. Source L supports this as it shows the brilliance of Henry's foreign policy at the Field of Cloth of Gold on French territory in 1520. We can see in the painting that many people are gathering there and also in the background you can see the tent that is made out of gold cloth. Henry and Francis met at the...

Words: 744 - Pages: 3

How Successful Was Wolsey’s Foreign Policy in the Years 1515-1525?

...How Successful was Wolsey’s Foreign Policy in the Years 1515-1525? (30 marks) Wolsey became Henry VIII’s Lord Chancellor in 1515, he was extremely able and determined; his foreign policy was mainly directed at preserving peace and trying to make England a negotiator between other countries. During the years 1515-1525 Wolsey’s power was undisputed, this was due to the fact that Henry VIII delegated more and more state business to Wolsey including near-complete control of England’s foreign policy. The extent of Wolsey’s success can be measured in several ways; these include the financial stability of the country, loyalty from England’s allies and respect for Wolsey (and Henry VIII) from English subjects and foreigners. Wolsey’s greatest achievement in creating a successful foreign policy was the Treaty of London, in 1518, which was known as a ‘universal’ treaty of peace, it united all of Christendom under Henry VIII’s sponsorship with a mutual non-aggressive pact that provided collective support and aid in the case of conflict. While doing this Wolsey also saw the opportunity to re-unite France and England by betrothing Henry VIII’s first daughter, Mary, to the dauphin (first son of the King), by doing this Wolsey also achieved Tournai for England again for 600,000 crowns. Bishop Fox described Wolsey’s maneuver with France as “The best deed that was ever done for England; and, next to the King, the praise is due to Wolsey”. Many people have questioned whether Wolsey’s...

Words: 739 - Pages: 3

Foreign Policy

... and opinions expressed in this article would imply that the embargo has failed in all aspects! It removed a large market for several areas of the American economy, and harmed the Cuban people setting the country back several decades in growth advancement. This legislation gave Mr. Castro justification and an excuse for the failures of a homegrown socialistic government. This was definitely the opposite intention of this policy. This article addressed several areas of concern in relation to the triangle. The issue of whether to change foreign policy and ease the embargo has been discussed in congress many times over the past several years. Each time it has been thwarted due to Cuban Americans of Florida and the New American Foundation lobbying congressmen to keep the various bills stalled in committee. Conversely, the Texas Farm Bureau, State Farm Union, and the United States Chamber of Commerce lobbyist have tried to get bills approved in order to capitalize on free trade with Cuban markets for farm products and tourism. Many dollars have been spent by both sides in efforts to convince congressmen to vote a certain way on changing the policy toward Cuba. The Texas Farm bureau has visited Cuba and laid the foundations for the exportation of farm products which would provide food for Cuban people and provide income for American farmers across the nation. With the lifting of travel and export restrictions, American and Cuban citizens would both benefit...

Words: 973 - Pages: 4

Foreign Policy

...Name: Karis Pitloff Humans Right’s Issue: Human Trafficking in Thailand Foreign Policy Approach Used (isolationism, diplomacy, interventionism, imperialism): interventionism Source 1: "Thailand: Traffickers Access Government-run 'Shelter' | Human Rights Watch." Thailand: Traffickers Access Government-run 'Shelter' | Human Rights Watch. N.p., n.d. Web. 23 July 2013. Source 2: "HumanTrafficking.org | Thailand." HumanTrafficking.org | Thailand. N.p., n.d. Web. 23 July 2013. Source 3:"Help Us End Human Trafficking and Slavery (in Thailand) - CNN IReport." CNN IReport. N.p., n.d. Web. 23 July 2013. Human Right’s Issue Origin: Recently, there have been many reports about human trafficking in Thailand. Many perverted people find that human trafficking is an easy way to make money. When they see lonely, vulnerable girls, they take advantage of them. Some girls may be willing to sell themselves and their bodies because they need to find a way to support themselves. When that is the case, the family and their children are also affected by that woman's decision. The families are scared for their lives. Trafficking is another form of violating human rights. Humans are not garbage, they don't get picked up on tuesdays and thursday to be brought to a center. People aren't supposed to own other people. People need to know that they are supposed to make their own decisions and not have someone else make it for them. Response of United States and United Nations (details and......

Words: 341 - Pages: 2

How Successful Was Louis Xviii’s Foreign Policy Between 1815 and 1824?

...Q.13 How successful was Louis XVIII’s foreign policy between 1815 and 1824? Louis XVIII’s foreign policy was mostly successful between 1815 and 1824. France had a stable relationship with the Quadruple Alliance to start off with which could be further built upon with successful foreign policy. • The Second Treaty of Paris was more punitive than the first but it is important to notice that France was involved in the Treaty and attended the Congress of Vienna. • France was not treated like a leper within international relations as was Germany a century later. Louis XVIII’s first success in foreign policy was in 1818. • Rapid payment of the indemnity, organised by Richelieu, meant that all foreign troops had withdrawn from France two years ahead of schedule. • This enabled France to resume her independent role in European politics. • The conference of Aix-la-Chappell saw France joining the Quadruple Alliance and made it the Quintuple Alliance. =This meant that France regained some of her international prestige and was no longer ‘the defeated power’ However, the Spanish colonies in South America were an area of failure in foreign policy for Louis • The French regime had strived to establish French influence in South America when the trouble in Spain had allowed some of the areas she had controlled to break away. =France came up against the British foreign minister, Canning, who made it very clear that the French should not meddle in that area...

Words: 499 - Pages: 2

Do You Agree with the Suggestion in Source N That Henry and Wolsey Conducted and Effective Foreign Policy in the Years 1515-1525?

...Do you agree with the suggestion in Source N that Henry and Wolsey conducted and effective foreign policy in the years 1515-1525? Sources L and N agree that Henry and Wolsey conducted an effective foreign policy in the years 1515-25 although as source L is a painting it has a motive and probably a bias one whilst source M disagrees with the statement by highlighting ‘troubles associated from the Amicable Grant’. In source N (which is featured in a book wrote about Henry VIII at the time in question) contradicts itself to make its point. “Failed to bring great gains to the country, but it did thrust the country into a major role which that its wealth and population scarcely justified...” this makes the reader think that this was worth it for the positives it brought. There were many successes of their (Henry and Wolsey’s) foreign policy. Wolsey was a successful peace broker, and the treaty of London in 1518 was a great example of him ability. This treaty in 1518 was an agreement of peace which seemed to put England in to the centre of diplomatic affairs in Europe (which was what Henry wanted). The treaty bound France, Spain, the Papacy, HRE and England against the Turkish. At the time it seemed like a great success as it seemed to signify the end of fear of England being isolated in Europe, however in the long term it failed despite the short term success. Another success was the foreign policies flexibility despite England and the King having such low income and money...

Words: 795 - Pages: 4

Foreign Policy

...Today’s American Foreign Policy has not only been molded around the political steam rollers ideology of present and past, has carried fourth most of the same ideology throughout . As we analyze American Foreign Policy implemented over the course of World War I and World War II, The Vietnam War, The Korean War, and policies brought fourth during The Wars’ on Terrorism (Iraq and Afghanistan) we will illustrate the setbacks and failures of each while drawing significant relations between all. Before discussion the different American Foreign Policies we must understand what a Foreign Policy is and how it may affect us. By definition “foreign policy- a policy pursued by a nation in its dealings with other nations, designed to achieve national objectives.” (foreign policy, n.d.). The intentions of the American Foreign Policies are put in place to protect not only American business world but the globalization of the free market, although at time the American Policies are called into question with tremendous criticism, they are intended to protect the American people from the capable harm of other nations. “Global public opinion is not a new concern for U.S. foreign policy. Woodrow Wilson often referred to it, even stating that it "ultimately governs the world" (cited in Ninkovich 1999, 67).” (Goldsmith, B.E, Horiuchi, Y., Inoguchi, T., Jun., 2005) By assuming this role of the protector of all, the American Government felt they must adopt the “intervention role” thus policing...

Words: 1513 - Pages: 7

Vdid Wolsey and Henry Have an Effective Foreign Policy During the Years 1515 – 1525?

...vDid Wolsey and Henry have an effective foreign policy during the years 1515 – 1525? In some respects it can be said that Henry and Wolsey had an effective foreign policy in the years 1515 – 1525. Henry and Wolsey were responsible for the Treaty of London and were also sought after as a useful ally by other more important European powers. However some would argue that their policies were not effective due to the amount of money that was spent on international events and warfare and the fact that nothing was really achieved. Firstly it could be argued that his policies were effective due to the fact that Henry and Wolsey were responsible for the Treaty of London, the signatories were France, England, Holy Roman Empire, the Papacy, Spain, Burgundy and the Netherlands, all of whom agreed not to attack one another and to come to the aid of any that were under attack. This was a great achievement for Henry and Wolsey as England managed to aucestrate a treaty that was way above its size and importance, this therefore brought England to the table of European politics this means that Henry and Wolsey had an effective foreign policies. In addition source L supports this because Henry is large and this implies that he was considered important and this implies that his policies must have been successful as he was considered godlike. However the painting might have been painted to demonstrate Henrys power and wealth. There is also a dragon in the painting implicating that it is...

Words: 582 - Pages: 3

Foreign Policy

...Policemen of the World Thesis and Outline Janene Bull Professor Joel A. Goldstein Contemporary US History 2/22/2015 The evolution of U.S. Foreign policy following the Civil War is continually evolving. During the Civil War years, America had an economy that was based on agriculture. Farmers were growing cotton, tobacco and sugarcane. Slaves from Africa worked on these enormous plantations. . At the time, America was in an election year with Lincoln as the candidate of the Republican Party claiming he was going to abolish slavery. When Lincoln won the election he did just that, immediately there after 7 states declared their independence from the US, they were then known as Confederate States. After a few years 4 more states also joined the original 7 states for a total of11 states that left the union. Foreign policy is a country's self interest strategy to safeguard its national interests and to achieve goals within international relations. During the past 5 years there have been events that can be traced back to foreign policy's created after the Civil War. For example, Issues Regarding Guantanamo Bay (Policy - Platt Amendment of 1901), and the attempt to Stop the Soviet Expansion during the Cold War (Policy - Truman Doctrine of 1947). America has taken on a policing roll, and has acted as an enforcer of global rules. When there is a threat to world peace the U.S will respond. Three instances where America has taken on the policing roll are; The...

Words: 602 - Pages: 3

Foreign Policy

... brings the corrupt nature of the foreign policy under the President Zuma Administration which appears to be influenced by the elite socials. It brings how the foreign policy is made to suit the needs of corrupt individuals whilst putting the lives of soldiers at risk. The consequences of the military presence in C.A.R brought mixed reactions back at home. Firstly, the death of thirteen military personnel made President Zuma to mention that they died for a worthy cause and observed the country`s foreign policy (Patel 2013). Although these proud words are expected from the Chief in command but the reality of not observing the foreign policy procedures cannot be tolerated. The journalist (Glenn 2013) discovered that South Africa entered without a UN or AU led mandate, this questionable act brings mistrust on the President Zuma Administration. It shows the image of foreign policy as influenced by the senior state officials, which as mentioned indicates corruption. The South Africa Civil Society stated that it “rejects the issue of attempting to project economic power through military projection.” (Glenn 2013) The voices of discontent from the civilians indicate their disapproval of the abuse of power to compromise foreign policies in the Government white paper. The Gupta scandal was another despicable event which displayed the failure of accountable governance. The landing of the Jet Airways on Waterkloof military airbase caused the political analyst (Nyoni 2013) to mention...

Words: 2187 - Pages: 9

How Successful Was the Usa’s Policy of Containment?

...How successful was the USA’s policy of containment? The policy of containment was not a success, As after the war, The USA aimed to quarantine communism to the only place it existed, Russia. However soon despite this, communism spread and communist dictatorship controlled most of Eastern Europe, soon after this the most populated state on earth, China, fell to a communist regime, as well as the creation of communist states in Vietnam and Korea. This consistent creation of communist states and the failure of the USA to prevent this, shows how ultimately, despite apparent success in some of Europe and Asia, the Policy of Containment failed in its primary function, to contain and prevent the spread of communism and therefore it was not a success. However it is arguable that in some ways the USA’s Policy of Containment was a great success in preventing the spread of communism early on during the Cold War. One piece of evidence that supports the argument that the USA had early success with their policy of containment is The Greek Civil War. The USA’s decision to intervene due to the “strategic significance of Greece in the Balkans and the Mediterranean” arguably was successful. With this clear threat of communist expansion into Western Europe, Truman called for congress to uphold the Truman Doctrine and provide funding to aid the battle against the spread of communism that clearly threatened the USA’s interests in Europe. This resulted in $400 million dollars of funding...

Words: 2612 - Pages: 11

How Successful Was Henry Vii in Achieving Foreign Policy Objectives

...How successful was Henry VII in fulfilling his foreign policy objectives? Generally speaking, overall, Henry VII was successful in fulfilling his foreign policy objectives. Although he did not achieve a number of things in the way he endeavoured to, Henry VII achieved the majority of his foreign policy objectives one way or another. Firstly, Brittany, a part of Europe where Henry spent a large part of his life, was under attack by the French and faced losing their independence, following an invasion in 1487. Henry felt as though he had a duty and sense of obligation to the Britons, and therefore summoned Parliament to grant him extraordinary revenue in order to raise an army sufficient enough to battle against the French. Crushing the potential French control of Brittany was very important to Henry, as by doing so would decrease the possibility of France invading England. This soon became one of Henry's main foreign policy objective, to defend Brittany and potentially, England. Additionally, England and Brittany signed the Treaty of Redon in 1489, in which, Duchess Anne would pay for a small English army to defend Brittany. Henry strived to strengthen is position by forming an alliance with Maximilian. Maximilian had contracted a marriage-by-proxy with Anne, and had no desire fro the Duchy of Brittany to fall into the French hands. The army went to Brittany to support their freedom, but Anne had lost her motive, and reluctantly married Charles VIII. To make things...

Words: 907 - Pages: 4

Foreign Policy

... opposing sides were in government, so there was looming crisis between 1963 and 1967. Hence, parliament passed a document in 1965, Sessional paper No.10. Titled African Socialism and its Application to Kenya passed by the legistrature. This document to date put Kenya on the capitalist side therefore aligning to the west. This document was on a greater scale championed by the moderate camp headed by the then president Kenyatta and Mboya. This gravely angered the radicals, the likes of Odinga and Oneko. At this period also there were was a lot of political heat in east Africa at large, Tanzania had united with Zanzibar, there was a coup in Uganda, crisis in Congo that Kenyatta had tried to help solve but failed and still Kenya had its own problems to take care of like the shifta war and the mutiny of some soldiers made Kenyatta rise to the occasion. At this time Britain was the only foreign ally affiliated with Kenya and Kenyatta badly needed her support and on the same instance Britain wanted her interests protected in Kenya. Just to briefly mention, there was another problem that led to the initial development of the foreign policy in Kenya in both regional and international relations. The ‘shifta’ war in the north eastern district of Kenya had insurgents from Somalia had a plan to foment discord in countries that had a vast Somali population like Ethiopia and Kenya. Notably, Somalia had attained independence three years earlier. So, in combating a common enemy Kenya and......

Words: 2005 - Pages: 9

Foreign Policy

... such theoretical approaches seems to be necessary to obtain a comprehensive picture of US foreign policy. Keywords: US foreign policy, defensive and offensive realism, liberalism, marxism, neoclassical realism, constructivism 1. Introduction This paper aims to examine some of the prominent approaches to US foreign policy which have been put forth by International Relations scholars to explain and predict the conduct of US foreign policy. American foreign policy refers to the actions taken by the United States abroad to pursue its goals: ‘to create a more secure, democratic and prosperous world for the benefit of the American people and the international community’ (The Department of State 2013, Missions of the department of State). It is admitted that security, democracy and prosperity have been the lasting values and interests of the United States (Wittkopf et al 2008, p. 25). The process of making foreign policy to sustain these values and interests are determined by five major categories of sources (i) the external environment, (ii) the societal environment of the nation, (iii) the governmental setting, (iv) the roles of foreign policymakers, and (v) the individual personalities of foreign policy-making elites (Wittkopf et al 2008, p. 15). Wittkopf et al also see these five sets of determinants as inputs and use the funnel metaphor to vividly describe how they together shape American foreign policy as illustrated in the Figure 1 (Wittkopf et al 2008, p. 15...

Words: 4904 - Pages: 20

How Successful Was Mussolini's Foreign Policy in the Years to 1939?

...How successful was Mussolini's foreign policy in the years to 1939? During the years 1922-39 Mussolini committed to many different foreign policies. Mussolini’s foreign policy aims for Italy were to build national prestige, increase domestic support for the regime, gain dominance over the Mediterranean, and spread fascism abroad to establish his empire. He had to consider factors whilst formulating his foreign policy plans such as trading, alliances (military back-up/defence), resources within the empire and war to ensure that his regime would be a success. In many ways, Mussolini’s foreign policy was a success in the short term. His foreign policies can be judged whether or not to be successful by looking at his aims, as previously stated, and if these aims were achieved. Mussolini entered the Spanish Civil War in 1936 as part of an anti-Bolshevik campaign and to help spread fascism abroad, one of the clear aims of Mussolini. Italy sent planes and troops to help nationalist General Franco’s revolt against Spain’s socialist government and despite Mussolini expecting a short war it lasted 3 years. Mussolini’s intervention of this war was to achieve dominance over the Mediterranean, to spread fascism abroad, stop French left-wing influence in Spain and to gain an ally in a strategic area. In the battle of Guadalajara, in March 1937, Italian troops were defeated and 400 soldiers were killed and 1,800 wounded, 500 were taken prisoner and 25 artillery pieces, 10 mortars...

Words: 1157 - Pages: 5