Premium Essay

Ian Weaver's Work Analysis

Submitted By
Words 587
Pages 3
Ian Weaver’s work is interdisciplinary in format and narrative in content and his work utilizes a variety of media such as drawing/collage, sculpture, installation and film, which act as metaphors for “fracture.” Weaver is interested in how we as individuals and communities, construct our own identities, histories, and memories. Weaver stated how we do all of this through our monumentalization and the objects that we construct and archive. Overall, his work communicates the concept that, “Memory is fractured, non-linear, and disparate in nature; the experience of ‘recall’ is a dissociative one.” He wants the viewer to, “question the constructions we routinely undertake through our lives.” The artist talked about several of his projects: Documents (2004-2006), Black Bottom History …show more content…
His first project was something he worked on collaboratively with his mother to find any documentation that was relative to his family's history in their community (which had been erased). This project was titled, Documents (2004-2006), and was a series of 10 document paintings. My favorite piece from this series is called, Letter (2006), which was a letter from grandmother to his mother. He described the letter as “cold and formal,” like the documents that they could find. Weaver ended this project after two years because he didn’t want to be known for any one specific style of work. When looking back on the series, he decided that didn’t want to become the document painter. He felt done with it when he first saw the series of paintings together and didn’t like how the government played a role in destroying their family history and the history of the community around his family at the time. He wanted to get away from the negativity attached to the meaning of the series and he was upset that his family didn’t really have a family

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Will Do Next Time

...Instructor’s Manual and Test Bank to accompany A First Look at Communication Theory Sixth Edition Em Griffin Wheaton College prepared by Glen McClish San Diego State University and Emily J. Langan Wheaton College Published by McGraw­Hill, an imprint of The McGraw­Hill Companies, Inc., 1221 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10020. Copyright Ó 2006,  2003, 2000, 1997, 1994, 1991 by The McGraw­Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. The contents, or parts thereof, may be reproduced in print form  solely for classroom use with A First Look At Communication Theory provided such reproductions bear copyright notice, but may not be reproduced in  any other form or for any other purpose without the prior written consent of The McGraw­Hill Companies, Inc., including, but not limited to, in any  network or other electronic storage or transmission, or broadcast for distance learning. PREFACE Rationale We agreed to produce the instructor’s manual for the sixth edition of A First Look at Communication Theory because it’s a first-rate book and because we enjoy talking and writing about pedagogy. Yet when we recall the discussions we’ve had with colleagues about instructor’s manuals over the years, two unnerving comments stick with us: “I don’t find them much help”; and (even worse) “I never look at them.” And, if the truth be told, we were often the people making such points! With these statements in mind, we have done some serious soul-searching about the texts that so many teachers—ourselves...

Words: 159106 - Pages: 637