...written by J.C Burke and the speech ‘From Death Row To Law Graduate’ by Peter Ouko both follow the transitions of young men who face personal and social boundaries, challenging beliefs and attitudes of both protagonists and the situations they are in resulting in growth and new perceptions. An individual’s personal and social boundaries have an impact on the perceptions of themselves, others and the world around them. The ‘Story Of Tom Brennan’...
Words: 1001 - Pages: 5
...Denied: The Effects Being Ignored Death by lethal injection, death by electrocution, or any form of the death penalty given that people find to be fit for capital crimes is not a human’s right. We as humans do not have the right to end someone’s life based on the fact that they committed a crime. We have to take into accountability the countless amounts of lives that are impacted by this. Even on the international level, there are hundreds of countries who have abolished the death penalty completely. There is more to this than others think, yet they do not take the time to research or study the adverse effects of what this kind of punishment can cause. The death penalty violates the human right to life and causes a ripple effect that destroys the lives of the families of the individuals being executed. Death penalty supporters can be very profound with their opinions on what they believe is an excellent crime deterrent. In an article written for the Journal of Criminal Justice between May and June 2009, one of the authors by the name Shanhe Jiang stated, “Supporters of the death penalty argue that sentencing criminals to death deters others from committing a similar crime in the future.” He states that future crimes could indeed be deterred because of the continued support for the death penalty. In many cases, people see the death penalty as a form to punish those who commit murder, mass murder, rape and any other crime that warrants death. Supporters of this crime deterrent...
Words: 2025 - Pages: 9
...punish also it affects the public when criminal put to death. The impact on the public is most impressive it could debate upon this so many times. Also against the matter, give a thorough explanation putting to death, criminal also the impact on the public. At this current time, research does not only show that the sentence to the death penalty is intricate in many ways. However, capital punishment has started to make people ask many questions it connection with preventing criminal act's effect. That it has on the public economically by having information that recent and from the past, also using articles of scholarly and other articles on the topic as well. To help support, the reason this research is essential and he would aid society to use different tactics. To help benefit both side issues, within the debate, they have on this matter. The costly and ethical standpoint of the death penalty The Kentucky lawmaker stated that it was too expensive to use the methods of using the sentence to death as a form of punishment. Also, how it might seem as morally wrong, to do, although the commission tells the truth about the expensive cost of administering the sentence to death penalty. It hardly talks about the ethical, also principled wickedness of the practices sentence to capital punishment. In the article, it says that it is ethnic also socioeconomic prejudice, with the penalty of sentenced to death also how it might or would begin to start worrying...
Words: 1651 - Pages: 7
...The Impact of the Death Penalty Political Science 1101 June 12, 2012 The Impact of the Death Penalty In our society today, there are various reasons why we have to punish the criminals so that they would learn their lesson for the crime that they committed and stop committing such crimes. There are several different ways to punish the criminals and one that has been receiving a lot of attention in the 21st century is the death penalty. The discussion about the death penalty has been going on ever since the early days but the publics’ opinion about this matter has been changing. While some people might support the idea of the death penalty for they may feel that it is fair for one to be sentenced to death and be killed if they kill others. The topic of the death penalty is a moral issue and it just basically depends on whom you ask to get a better understanding of whether it is just or unjust punishment. Although the percentage of Americans in favor of the death penalty has fluctuated significantly over the years, eighty percent of Republicans support the death penalty. Democrats are more likely to oppose the death penalty while Republicans will support the death penalty because they consider it a necessary deterrence to crime. However Harrison and Harris noted, “America prides itself on being a human rights leader, but “since 1973, states have released more than 107 prisoners from death row after evidence...
Words: 1131 - Pages: 5
...DEATH PENALTY FOR DRUG TRAFFICKING SHOULD BE ABOLISHED General Purpose : To inform Specific Purpose : To inform my audience about why death penalty should be abolished Organisational Pattern : Topical Order Central Idea : Drug trafficking is indeed detrimental but it should be abolished because there’s a better alternative to it INTRODUCTION I. A lady folded her new clothes and placed them neatly at the head of her bed. Then, she made a green bean soup while placing her Mcdonald’s burger on the stool. She didn’t eat that night. Instead, she spent the night talking to her friends and singing religious songs. That was how Donggui, a lady from China spent her night before undergoing a death penalty the next day II. Drug trafficking is indeed a heinous crime to commit but it would be unfair to subject the traffickers to a death penalty because there’s a better alternative to it III. I have made a thorough research on drug trafficking and the impact of the imposition of death penalties IV. For this topic, I will elaborate on what drug trafficking is, why death penalty should be abolished and what’s a better alternative to death penalty (Transition : Let me begin with enlightening you with what drug trafficking is) BODY I. What is drug trafficking? A. According to section 2 of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952, drug trafficking is the cultivation, manufacture, distribution and sale of any dangerous drug without any authority 1. The laws relating...
Words: 1143 - Pages: 5
...Current Event – Role of Special Interest Groups Paper AJS 552 Week 4 The Death Penalty - Public Safety vs. Individual Rights Introduction This paper will focus on the criminal justice system, public safety and civil rights in specific relation to the death penalty as a form of punishment and its effects on society. The execution of criminals and the effects on society are most intriguing and can be debated upon both for and against the issue give a thorough elaboration on criminal executions and the effects on society. In this day and age, research not only illustrates that the death penalty is complex, in more ways than one, but has also raised questions about its relations to deterring crime and the financial impact it has on society. Using current and historical information, such as articles and scholarly articles, to support why this research is important and possible methods society could use to help improve this controversial debate. Summary The Orange County register printed an article on the death penalty and possibly being considered as immoral. “While the commission drops the dime on the mind-numbing cost of administering the death penalty, it barely hints at the moral and ethical depravity of the practice” (Mears, 2008). The article states that there are racial and socioeconomic bias towards the death penalty and how this can and may lead to a cause for concern among citizens. This seems to initiate that in most cases the targets of race are African...
Words: 1072 - Pages: 5
...Since 1973 over 130 people have been released from death row due to wrongful convictions, and that is only the tip of the iceberg. If you take into account; the multiple decades that many innocent people have sat behind bars awaiting their execution and add in the billions of dollars spent above what non-death penalty cases cost, the benefits of abolishing the death penalty outweighs the risk. Most of those, who oppose abolishing the death penalty, also feel there should be much higher standards for those who are eligible for capital punishment, however, there is no way to increase the maximum penalty for someone after they are convicted of a Capital crime. The most plausible way to prevent wrongful death penalty convictions is to abolish the death penalty completely. If we eliminate capital punishment, then we also eliminate the possibility of potentially taking an innocent life, it will also save millions of dollars every year in almost every state that still uses capital punishment, as well as save the many victims of the death penalty. It doesn't only effect those who are accused of the crime but also their; parents, children, spouses, friends ect. The cost of the death penalty is a major reason it should be abolished. The cost begins with the original trial. Jury selection alone can take over a month and there is extensive questioning about views on the death penalty to look for any bias that may become a factor in how they vote after the trial. They will...
Words: 1781 - Pages: 8
...of sentencing convicted murderers to life in prison without the possibility of parole. There are currently over 121 people in Oregon who have received this sentence. The death penalty puts innocent lives at risk. Since the reinstatement of the death penalty in the United States in 1976, 138 innocent men and women have been released from death row, including some who came within minutes of execution. In Missouri, Texas and Virginia investigations have been opened to determine if those states executed innocent men. To execute an innocent person is morally reprehensible; this is a risk we cannot take. Race and place determine who lives and who dies. Those who kill whites are more likely to be sentenced to die than those who kill African-Americans. In Oregon, prosecutors from some counties are more likely to pursue the death penalty than others are. We pay many millions for the death penalty system. According to the Oregonian, in 1995 the trials for three Washington County murder cases cost more than $1.5 million. One was sentenced to death. The two others, one of whom was found guilty of four murders, are not on death row. In 2000 a fiscal impact summary from the Oregon Department of Administrative Services stated that the Oregon Judicial Department alone would save $2.3 million annually if the death penalty were eliminated. It is estimated that total prosecution and defense costs to the state and counties equal $9 million per...
Words: 259 - Pages: 2
...murderers and rapist? I believe some change is necessary; the death penalty should be legalized in all states. The United States should use the capital punishment because it is economical and has deterring effects. While life with no parole sentencing is a valid sentence, the death penalty is in public favor, ruled as constitutional, is humane, and allows convicts many opportunities to appeal. Many people will claim that too many inmates are executed, the national death row currently has a population of 3726 criminals, and only 712 convicts have been executed since 1976. According to the FBI Uniform Crime Report and Bureau of Justice Statistics, approximately 560,000 murders and 358 executions have taken place from 1967 to 1996. In comparison to life sentencing, the death penalty is far more economical as well. Life without parole costs $5.53 million per prisoner while death penalty costs only $1.91 million per prisoner. While immediate costs of capital punishment make it seem a more expensive punishment, the costs of life sentences greatly exceed them; factors such as increasing prison, medical, and geriatric costs add to costs of life without parole cases (www.prodeathpenalty.com). Innocent people have not been executed either. Criminals on death row have been convicted of brutal, heinous crimes and murders and are not "model citizens." There has not been a case in which an inmate sentenced to death was found innocent postmortem. Inmates whose innocence is proven...
Words: 1045 - Pages: 5
...Assignment #7 Death Penalty Valerie Miller A. Reading: Chapter 5 B. Answer the following questions, 1 pt each unless otherwise noted: 1. In the U.S., is it legally permissible to execute juvenile and developmentally disabled offenders? Do you believe this should this be changed? Explain why or why not. (2 pts) Currently it is not permissible to execute juvenile and developmentally disabled offenders. As it was found in two court rulings to violate the Eighth Amendment. I do not feel that this should be changed because I feel that the death penalty overall should be abolished. 2. In this chapter, the arguments opposing and in favor of incapacitation, retributive justice, human dignity, and human rights are presented. Discuss which argument(s) you support and why. Which argument(s) do you least support and why? (2 pts) I am in agreement with the human dignity argument that the death penalty lowers us to the level of the criminal. I am in strongest disagreement with Retributive Justice. How can we carry out an “equality of crime and punishment”? As Bentham says, how can one act of violence cancel out the other? And it’s unrealistic to say equality of crime and punishment, because we aren’t going to rape a rapist or burn down the house of an arsonist. 3. Why is there a concern about who receives the death penalty? AND How does Van den Haag respond? (2 pts) Because of the number of innocent people that are executed, and because the death penalty also removes...
Words: 887 - Pages: 4
...Contemporary Issues: Death Penalty Faith Clark University Phoenix Online CJA 313 Timothy Walsh November 10, 2009 Contemporary Issues: Death Penalty “Capital punishment or the death penalty, is the execution of a person by judicial process as a punishment for an offense. Crimes that can result in a death penalty are known as capital crimes or capital offences. The term capital originates from Latin capitalis, literally "regarding the head" (Latin caput). Hence, a capital crime was originally one punished by the severing of the head.” Execution of criminals and political opponents has been used by nearly all societies—both to punish crime and to suppress political dissent. In most places that practice capital punishment it is reserved for murder, espionage, treason, or as part of military justice. In some countries sexual crimes, such as rape, adultery, incest and sodomy, carry the death penalty. What does the death penalty do? Is it effective? Is it worth the cost? In United States, Michigan was the first state to ban the death penalty, on May 18, 1846. The death penalty was declared unconstitutional between 1972-1976 based on the Furman v. Georgia case, but the 1976 Gregg v. Georgia case once again permitted the death penalty under certain circumstances. Currently thirty five states plus the US military and Government's permit the death penalty, while fifteen states and the District of Columbia do not. Of the states where the death penalty is permitted...
Words: 1217 - Pages: 5
...Is Capital Punishment justified? Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, can be defined as "the premeditated and planned taking of a human life by a government in response to a crime committed by that legally convicted person" (White). The death penalty is executed in many countries whether they are developed, developing or underdeveloped nations. Many different types of execution are used around the world. The most common forms would be lethal injections, electric chairs, and gas chambers. In many countries execution by shooting, stoning, hanging or beheading are still used. One can argue that capital punishment has positive impacts, although statistics, research and professional studies show serious flaws. By using a system that values retribution over rehabilitation, men, women, and even children, are all put at risk of facing execution whether they are truly proven guilty or wrongfully convicted. The death penalty is unjustified because it is fundamentally immoral, ineffective in preventing crime, and sometimes mistakenly used to punish innocent people. The possibility of execution of an innocent citizen is reason enough for capital punishment to be considered an injustice. Since 1973, over 140 people in America have been wrongfully convicted and exonerated from death row due to the evidence of their wrongful conviction. (Amnesty International) “We all make mistakes” is a phrase often used and demonstrated through human behaviour. However, this mistake...
Words: 1262 - Pages: 6
...California because too many innocent people have been executed, it cost too much money, it does not act as a deterrent to crimes, and life without parole is a more practical option than capital punishment. There are too many flaws in the capital punishment system and many of them lead to innocent people being executed. According to John W. Whitehead in his article “The Death Penalty Should be Abolished”, “In a Columbia University study on 5,760 capital cases, the report found an overall rate of error of 68 percent. In other words, courts found serious reversible errors in nearly 7 out of 10 capital cases.”(1). If one innocent person was executed that would be one to many, but the fact that there is an error rate of 68 percent is unacceptable. The most infuriating thing however, is that these innocent people are being executed because the law enforcement are cutting corners and not doing their jobs right. In Juan Roberto Meléndez-Colón’s article “DNA Testing Cannot Solve Fundamental Flaws in the Capital Punishment System” he explains the evidence that was used against him in his case, “I was convicted and sentenced to death based on the testimony of two questionable...
Words: 1805 - Pages: 8
...What is the death penalty? Its prisoners being sentenced to death for their crimes. Prisoners aren’t put to death as much as they were back in the day. We believe the death penalty is needed because, it keeps prisoners from rotting in jail there whole life. Another reason is an eye for an eye. The last reason is that it will lower the crime rate. People think that the death penalty is bad saying it’s morally wrong and no one deserves it. The truth is, it is right. People should have to pay for what they have done. Why sentence a guy to life in prison when you could just give him the death penalty instead. It keeps prisons from getting full and keeps them from wasting space. Putting a person in prison for the rest of their life is basically the same as letting them go free. They are in prison but that just means there are stricter rules than the outside life....
Words: 524 - Pages: 3
...organization whose focus is to combat discrimination within the justice system but also strives to lower prison populations, reduce sentences for nonviolent offenders, and abrogate capital punishment. The topic of his presentation is a call to action against the current divergence of equal justice by race and wealth and is accomplished with a strong statistical basis and a punctuation of anecdotes from his childhood and early career that highlight his experience in dealing with discrimination. Something I learned 1972, 300000 people imprisoned, now 2.3 million, 7 million on probation/parole ⅓ black men is in jail or parole 34% of African americans cannot vote in Alabama Life in prison for kids 1 out of 9 people on death row are innocent California spends $1b on death row per annum 11x more...
Words: 534 - Pages: 3
