Free Essay

In Act 4 Scene 1, How and to What Extent Does Shakespeare Create Comedy Through the Presentation of Dominance?

In: English and Literature

Submitted By hannyns
Words 1472
Pages 6
1346 words
In Act 4 Scene 1, how and to what extent does Shakespeare create comedy through the presentation of dominance?

In this scene Shakespeare creates comedy through dominance to a certain extent, Shakespeare shows two types of dominance, physical and mental dominance. Also, Shakespeare has made powers very clear in this scene. For instance, Petruchio is at the very top of the pecking order; as he controls everyone in the scene, Grumio is head servant, he comes second in the scene then the other servants…and then Katharina, Petruchio’s wife, whom has no power in the scene. She is manipulated and told what to do by every other character. The dominance creates comedy in this scene as the Elizabethan audience would find is amusing due to the roles played and how people are treated in relation to their rank in society, they would find it funny to see servants challenge their social role so long as they were put back in their place at the end. However, a modern audience is more likely to find the dominance insulting and misogynistic and no amusing at all. Act 4 scene 1 present’s dominance throughout and I am going to explore the comedy Shakespeare reveals through the assertive attitude he displays.
At the start of the scene Shakespeare uses sexual connotation during Grumio and Curtis’s comical row. ‘Curtis: Away, you three-inch fool, I am no beast! Grumio: Am I but three inches? Why, thy horn is a goof, and so long am I at the least.’ Lines 19-21. The two servants are caught up in a row due to Grumio’s leadership over the other servants, he in fact hits Curtis which is showing his dominance. The connotation would be seen as funny to the Elizabethan audience as they appear to be insulting each other and because they’re a lower class and even though they are both servants; Grumio thinks he has the upper hand. This is funny as the servants are acting like they have more power than they do, challenging their roles. But cleverly, Shakespeare has made them look quite stupid, which anyone would find amusing. Also, the word horn is used not only as sexual imagery but it also has connotations of animals in battle, like two goats fighting for the leadership role; portraying their dominance.
Shakespeare makes a clear distinction between social class by Petruchio using words like peasant and drudge. Basically implying that all his servants are good for is manual labour insulting the lower class and their intelligence, this would be amusing for Elizabethans. ‘Petruchio: You peasant swain! You whoreson malthorse drudge!’ line 100. This demonstrates Petruchio’s cruel attitude towards his servants. Petruchio speaks to his servants in a vicious tone from the videos I have seen on this scene. The way he treats his servants makes is apparent to the audience that he is very much in charge, he is the leader. This would’ve been entertaining for the Elizabethan audience as ranking in society was very important. The servants were treated poorly and for the Elizabethans it would’ve been laughable to watch. Also, Petruchio’s unkind approach toward his servants is apparent throughout the play in Act 1 Scene 2 it is shown in line 8 ‘Petruchio: Villain, I say, knock me here soundly.’ Again, referring in bad manor toward his servant Grumio. The use of the word peasant is using social dominance, here Petruchio is using social class directly to put Grumio down and ‘in his place’. Petruchio showing himself as a lord over the peasant; his hierarchy.
The way Petruchio portrays his power over Katharina by impersonating her shrew-like ways. He plays on her outrageous ways, and goes over the top. An example of this is where he throws the food around; ‘Petruchio: There, take it to you, trenchers, cups and all! [He throws the food and the dishes at them.]’ This is Shakespeare using antic disposition to portray Petruchio as a man shrew. This is humorous as Petruchio is mocking Katharina causing comedy for the audience. I got this information from a video I watched of a woman explaining this to me, she described Petruchio’s ways as antic distribution. Whilst explaining the scene she also informs us how she has played various characters in the scene.
In Petruchio’s soliloquy at the end of the scene, Petruchio uses the imagery of training ‘…Kites that bait and beat and will not be obedient…’ lines 166-167 He is saying here how he is going to tame Katharina, saying his power is capable of such a task. This could perhaps be seen as insulting towards women as he is treating her in a poor way ‘…She ate no meat today, nor none shall eat; Last night she slept not, nor tonight she shall not.’ Lines 168-169, Petruchio is demonstrating poor treatment of his wife. However to an Elizabethan audience this wouldn’t have been so appalling, however it still isn’t likely to be amusing. Also in Petruchio’s soliloquy, Nichola McAuliffe explains the way Petruchio uses the word falconry where he tells the audience he will deprive Katharina of her sleep and food, he is describing the way birds of prey are socialised.
At the start of the scene, the servants’ argument get physical when Grumio beats Curtis, ‘Grumio: Lend thine ear. Curtis: Here. Grumio: There. [He boxes Curtis’s ear.]’ Lines 24-45 Grumio’s dominance over Curtis could be taken as worrying rather than comical to the audience as no longer was the row just words. The way Grumio beats Curtis’s ear it shows he is doing it due to his power over Curtis and their social role. This would be unpleasant to watch as it is portraying violence.
Petruchio feels it is very necessary to show his power over his servants however he is in fact no better. He calls them vile names and speaks to them like dirt. He exaggerates every insult also, there is always more than one insult when he speaks poorly to the servants. ‘Petruchio: You logger-headed and unpolished grooms!’ line 96. As it was set in Elizabethan times it would’ve been seen as more acceptable but to some not quite accepted. It may seem like Shakespeare’s attempt to show dominance was taken too far, so that it was no longer amusing.
In conclusion I think that Shakespeare creates comedy through dominance to a certain extent as sometimes the power Shakespeare is trying to create is too overpowering. Also, this scene can be very much misunderstood, Nichola McAuliffe, has played Katharina twice and believes we misread Petruchio’s actions as we don’t understand his references to falconry. However the ‘torture’ scenes where he takes his powers to the extremes of not allowing Katharina to eat nor sleep is difficult to create a nice meaning too; other than his attempt to tame her. However the taming could be done in a much less severe way. Gregory Doran says “...I don’t think it’s describing an ideal relationship, but it is a real relationship.’ There is comedy created by dominance throughout the scene however it is very much Elizabethan comedy and wouldn’t be seen as comical by many people of today.
The Taming of the Shrew – Cambridge School Shakespeare
The Taming of the Shrew: ‘This is not a woman being crushed’ | Stage | The Guardian

[ 1 ]. (06/01)
Square's sixth production:
Directed by Rose Bochner and Dan Hasse
Produced by Serena Adlerstein and Chris Corbo
Assistant Director: Chris Corbo
Music Director: Chris Dubrow
Fight Choreography by Dan Hasse
Costume Design: Liz McGlone
Properties Master: Frankie Oliva
Stage Manager: Amber Como
Scenic Painter: Phil Falino
[ 2 ].
Link above from (06/01) which is a channel on YouTube of a person who refers to themself as Pcpatientzero and explains Shakespeare.
[ 3 ]. Nicola McAuliffe speaks on page ¾ of the article. She has played Katharina twice in theatre. Bradford Stage.
[ 4 ]. Nicola McAuliffe speaks on page ¾ of the article. She has played Katharina twice in theatre. Bradford Stage.
[ 5 ]. Gregory Doran who directed the play for the RSC in 2003. Speaks on page 2/4.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

What Are the Consequences of Conflict in Act 3 Scene 1

...In Act 3 Scene 1 of Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet the consequences of conflict and violence at very apparent. It is a huge turning point in this play as the Prince swore at the start of the play that if there was any more fighting then that person who caused that duel would die. But due to the circumstances, Romeo has only been banished as the death of Tybalt was revenge for Tybalt killing Mercutio, Romeo’s best friend. Romeo’s reaction to this is that he thinks that is the end of the world as he will never be able to see Juliet, his one true love, and the recently married couple will have a very distant relationship. So throughout this essay I will discuss what the consequences of conflict are in Act 3 Scene 1. The atmosphere at the beginning of the scene is quite happy and jolly but Benvolio is worried that there may be a meeting of Capulet’s and Montague’s following the challenge sent by Tybalt to Romeo. ‘By my heel, I care not.’ This shows us that Mercutio doesn’t care if the Capulet’s are hear or not as he is ready to and in a happy mood which is expressed through the use of the word ‘care’. Making us as an audience feel protected and appreciated because Tybalt has challenged Romeo to a duel but due to Mercutio’s arrogance we know that Romeo and us will be protected and care for by Mercutio if Tybalt is beating and nearly killing Romeo in this fight. How does Tybalt react to Romeo’s offer of peace? Describe Tybalt’s mood as the scene develops. How does Mercutio......

Words: 650 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

How Does Shakespeare Show the Different Moods and Feelings of Beatrice and Benedick in Act 2 Scene 1 and Act 4 Scene 1?

...How does Shakespeare show the different moods and feelings of Beatrice and Benedick in act 2 Scene 1 and Act 4 scene 1? Shakespeare demonstrates Beatrice and Benedick's relationship as intricate and diverse so in this essay I'm going to delve into their relationship and different moods and emotions. The character of Beatrice is introduced as bright and having a Sharp-tongue in act two scene one. She is already shown sharp-witted and mocks Benedick’s uselessness as a soldier and friend. In this scene they compete to outdo each other in their ‘Merry war’ with clever jabs at each other. In this scene Shakespeare shows that they have many different emotions. In Act two Scene one, Shakespeare expresses Beatrice’s disdainful opinion that Benedick ‘is the Prince’s Jester, a very dull fool’. By using the nouns ‘Jester’ and ‘fool’ this expresses that Beatrice does not think there is much to Benedick and that he is not very smart. The use of this language from Shakespeare presents Benedick in a negative way in the eyes of the audience. In addition, by using the adjective 'dull' Beatrice shows that she finds Benedick very boring and tedious. Benedick is also shown as having some resentment towards Beatrice in Act two Scene one. He expresses that his ‘visor began to assume life to scold with her.’ This demonstrates that he believes an inanimate object would come to life just to tell her off. By using the verb ‘scold’ this shows that he is angry at her since ‘scold’ is a......

Words: 671 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

How Does Shaw Present the Relationship Between Eliza and Higgins and to What Extent Does the Audience Find It Funny. class and manners through the play of his version of Pygmalion . I will be analysing these affects and how they are comedic to the audience. At the heart of these aspects are Henry Higgins and Eliza Doolittle, a relationship that Shaw depicts as a romance. Shaws clever use of phonetics ephasises the broad cockney accent which suggests that Eliza is lower class. The audience give her their sympathies specifically because of her misfortunes, begging people to buy flowers off her in the rain. But we find her comic all the same. There are traits of comedy of manners and satire in the way Shaw presents Eliza which we as the audience recognise and appreciate as Pygmalion is mainly about manners and class. Shaw describes Eliza as “ Not at all a romantic figure, her hair needs washing rather badly”. He chooses to portray his idea and opinions of lower class through this raw character emphasising Elizas vulgarity and appearance in addition to the fact that she sells flowers for a living. Eliza has a poor crass cockney accent “ Theres mennars for yah… Baw yah a flahrz of a pore gel”. Through language Shaw develops the humorous relationship between Eliza and Higgins. When we are first introduced to Henry Higgins as the notetaker. The audience have no notion that Shaw has chosen this character to be the pivotal one that will develop the relationship between himself and Eliza Dolittle. He is the anonymous notetaker in act 1. As act 1 develops he is brought......

Words: 1500 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

How Does Shakespeare Use Language in Act 3 Scene 1 to Develop Character Analysis?

...Coursework How Does Shakespeare Use Language in Act 3 Scene 1 to develop character analysis? This essay is based on how the characters of 'Romeo and Juliet’ change in Act 3 Scene 1. The characters I will be analysing are Romeo, Mercutio, Tybalt and Benvolio. In the following scene, Tybalt is provoked by Mercutio to begin a fight. Romeo tried to avoid this situation by hinting to Tybalt the reason Romeo refuses to fight him. This leads to the death of Mercutio and Tybalt. In previous scenes Shakespeare presents Romeo as a defensive character. ‘’I do protest, I never injure thee’. The word ‘protest’ shows us that Romeo has a point and wants to make it clear without Tybalt misunderstanding him! Romeo uses the word ‘never which instantly tells us that Romeo has never harmed Tybalt in any way. He says this calmly but it only makes Tybalt angrier as it only makes him want to prove that Romeo isn’t an innocent sweet guy. Throughout Act 3 Scene 1, Romeo seems to want to avoid the fight and stop it from occurring. ‘’Tybalt, the reason I have to love thee doth much excuse the appertaining rage’’. Romeo tries to make Tybalt understand that Romeo has to love him and Romeo doesn’t fight the ones he loves. The words ‘have to’ suggest to us that if Romeo wasn’t married to Juliet then he wouldn’t ‘have to’ love Tybalt. Therefore, there could have been a chance that Romeo didn’t have any doubt in fighting Tybalt. This reason excuses Romeo from the fight however it doesn’t excuse......

Words: 1792 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

With the Focus on Act 3 Scene 1, How Are Violence, Conflict and Tension Developed by Shakespeare Through Language, Setting and Plot?

...question: Shakespeare uses many dramatic devices to ensure that Romeo and Juliet is a play full of violence, conflict and tension. With the focus on Act 3 Scene 1, how are these techniques developed by Shakespeare through language, setting and plot? The very hopeful tone of Act II where Romeo and Juliet got married changes dramatically at the beginning of Act III as Romeo becomes entangled in the brutal conflict between the two families. The searing heat “day is hot”, flaring tempers “mad blood stirring” and sudden violence of this scene is a abrupt contrast with the romantic, peaceful previous night. The play reaches a dramatic climax as Romeo and Juliet’s private world clashes with the public feud with tragic consequences- death of Mercutio and Tybalt. Mercutio’s death becomes the catalyst for the tragic turn the play takes from this point onwards. The choice of the setting plays a big part in the development of this tragic turn. Shakespeare shifts the setting from the privacy of Friar Lawrence’s cell where Romeo and Juliet got married to a public place where friends, honour and family ties hold sway. This setting shows that innocent people are getting hurt because of all this feuding; “civil blood makes civil hands unclean”. On top of that it suggests that the families’ feud has reached its ultimatum-it has gone from private to public. We also get the feeling that they are nearing to the deaths which creates a bit of uneasiness. Shakespeare starts the scene with......

Words: 2039 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

What Extent Does Advertising Create Needs in Consumers?

...Advertisement is defined as a paid announcement, as of goods for sale, in newspapers or magazines, on radio or television, etc. Attracting consumers to an array of items or services ranging from personal to professional needs in order to get “buy in” from the consumer. Pre-existing desires are often the prime motivator of why a consumer will give an advertisement their attention. The point is does advertising create a need for a product, or is it fulfilling an existing need already there hidden inside and stimulated once a product of interest is advertised, or a combination of both. It may be more of an underline need to satisfy a pre-existing desire that propelled a consumer to acquire a product, not the advertising creating a need. Advertisement, to what extend does advertisement create needs in consumers is an ongoing argument among society. “Advertising: It fosters materialism, it psychologically manipulates people to buy things they don’t need” (Laurence & Leonard 2011). There may be manipulation at hand that has little or no affect, but not a creation of a need for things they don’t need with advertising. There has been many studies of AMI (Advertising message involvement), which has been identified as an important individual or situational factor influencing the advertising processing. (Laczniak & Muehling 1993). This statement a lone said that advertisement is based on research of an individual needs or situations, which drives advertising not advertising......

Words: 1252 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

How Does Goldsmith Use Disguise and Deception to Create Comic Situations in ‘She Stoops to Conquer’? to What Extent Can We Sympathize with the Victims of Deceit?

...How does Goldsmith use disguise and deception to create comic situations in ‘She Stoops to Conquer’? To what extent can we sympathise with the victims of deceit? In ‘She Stoops to Conquer’; Goldsmith uses disguise and deception in order to create comic situations which arise via the use of dramatic irony. Amusement is often gained as a result of the misfortune at others, as they are deceived. There are therefore, victims of deceit within the play, but as they are often victims of their own arrogance, it is difficult to sympathise with the victims in most cases. In order for the disguise and deception to be believable from the audience’s point of view, Goldsmith uses dialogues between the characters to insert small hints to make credible the acts of disguise and deception. The first use of this seen in the first scene of the first act, where Mrs Hardcastle suggests that their house ‘looks for all the world like an inn.’ This helps to justify the Marlow and Hastings believing that the Hardcastles house is an inn. Comedy arises from this, as due to the fact that Marlow and Hastings Believe Hardcastle’s house to be an inn, when conversing with Him they treat him like an innkeeper of a lower class than them. This is amusing, as the audience knows that he is the man whose daughter Marlow wishes to court, and Marlow is positively rude to him. The first time this is seen to happen is when Marlow and Hasting arrive at Hardcastle’s house, or to their knowledge, an Inn (Dramatic irony...

Words: 1493 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

‘Most Comedies Can Be Criticised for a Lack of Seriousness’. to What Extent Do You Believe This to Be the Case in the Play ‘Much Ado About Nothing’?

...‘Most comedies can be criticised for a lack of seriousness’. To what extent do you believe this to be the case in the play ‘Much Ado About Nothing’? ‘Much Ado About Nothing’ contains comedy throughout but it could be argued that seriousness is present in equal measure. They are portrayed simultaneously by Shakespeare in his play: where one scene is comedic to one part of the audience, seriousness could be interpreted by others. The writer uses comedy not only to entertain but to portray and challenge concepts of gender, class and other norms dominant in Shakespearean times but also remain evident in contemporary society. He also uses a leading male and female character to construct this gender challenge, with a woman who will not marry until ‘God make men of some other metal than earth’ and a man she refers to as ‘no less than a stuffed man’. The forwardness with these lines are delivered in contrast with the passive expectations an Elizabethan audience would expect from the leading female, however comedy remains as the moment is unexpected. Furthermore, class and status issues can be identified in the play, an obvious example being the Prince’s brother a ‘bastard’, marginalised from society because of who he is, and a ‘watchman’ who is described as an ‘ass’. Through their comedic interchange of insults, two of Shakespeare’s main characters demonstrate the negative impact of gender issues in Elizabethan times. Benedick and Beatrice are constantly sparring with each other,......

Words: 1680 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

How Satisfying Is the Resolution at the End of "A Midsummer Night's Dream" for the Audience and to What Extent Does It Restore Harmony?

...How satisfying is the resolution at the end of "A Midsummer Night's Dream" for the audience and to what extent does it restore harmony? Much like the ancient Greek comedies, Shakespeare uses a combination of comic conventions such as stock characters, green worlds and natural fools in order to produce a satisfying play of the 16th century. With audience in mind, Shakespeare utilizes these concepts of comedy in this five act play to ensure the ending would be considered harmonious as a comedy has often been described as 'beginning in turmoil but ending in harmony'. The play begins with the classical typography of a ancient Greek comedy; the promise of a wedding. The "nuptial hour" of Theseus and Hippolyta is used as the time frame for this play. The harmony between this royal couple illustrates to the audience that there is an order to return to which is why by the end of the play the two are wed to signify a restoration of harmony in order to assure the audience that everything of discord has been "amended". Hippolyta, who was "wooed" by a sword, seems quite content to marry the man who had "won" her love by "doing [her] injury" as she consoles Theseus with the notion that the time before their wedding will be "quickly dream[t] away". This insinuates that Hippolyta is in love with Theseus regardless of the language that suggests she was forced into the marriage, which wouldn't allow for a satisfying ending, especially to that of a modern audience. However, it may......

Words: 1568 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

How Does Shakespeare Make Act I Scene I in Richard Iii Significant and Dramatic?

...How does Shakespeare make Act I scene i in Richard III significant and dramatic?  |  In the Shakespearian tragedy Richard III, Act I scene i is made a very significant and dramatic part of the play as it is the grand opening of the entire production, and is therefore used to introduce many of the fundamental ideas and begin to familiarise the audience with some of the main characters and their individual personalities. By the time of Act I scene i, the Battle of Tewkesbury between York and Lancaster has recently concluded, with the result of York as victors and having possession of the throne.  Richard Duke of Gloucester is shown to have played a vital role in the victory at Tewkesbury- having been responsible for the death of Henry VI and Prince Edward (as revealed in Act I scene ii)-yet is denied the right of sovereignty by his elder brother, Edward. Richard reveals to the audience his feelings about this, and the apparent end of the war, through a soliloquy at the start of Act I scene i. After this, Richard proceeds to have an interaction with George, Duke of Clarence, who has been ordered to be taken to the tower for imprisonment by his brother, King Edward. There are three main ways that Shakespeare makes this scene significant and dramatic. Firstly, he reveals to us in the soliloquy that Richard has chosen to be a villain for the duration of the play, and gives us the reasons why. Shakespeare also shows to the audience Richard’s cunning and deceptive nature, by using......

Words: 1860 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

How Does Shakespeare Present the Diminishing of King Lear in Acts 1 and 2?

...The play’s plot is driven by the power and consequence of losses, more specifically, the losses and diminishing of Lear. In the course the play, King Lear, because of his flaws, loses his authority as a king, his identity as a father, and his sanity as a man. The play begins with King Lear's decision to divide his kingdom among his three daughters. This is the first sign of Lear's loss and diminishing of his power through the loss of his authority. Wanting to abandon his responsibilities before his time, Lear claims, "tis our fast intent / To shake all cares and business from our age, / Conferring them on younger strengths while we / Unburdened crawl toward death". It can be argued that this diminishment comes from his own decision to prematurely abdicate the throne. Lear carries immense insecurity and egotism as he announces that he will offer the largest share of kingdom to the daughter who professes the greatest love for him. Goneril and Regan both proclaim in fulsome terms that they love him more than anything in the world, while Cordelia speaks from her heart in honest terms that she loves him exactly as a daughter should love her father. Valuing self-importance above all else, Lear is blind to the loyalty and love of Cordelia and instead, perceptive to the flattery of his two vile daughters. This only furthers the notion that his diminishing is not only largely self initiated and inflicted but also that it is largely deserved as one is likely to sympathise with......

Words: 498 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

By Considering the Dramatic Effects Produced by Action and Language, Evaluate How Shakespeare Presents Lear and the Storm in Act 3 Scene 2.

...By considering the dramatic effects produced by action and language, evaluate how Shakespeare presents Lear and the storm in Act 3 Scene 2. Lear’s elder daughters have stripped him of his power and status, abandoning him to the dreadful storm. As his mind breaks down, he begins to see reality in a new light and to confront unpleasant truths. The style and structure of Lear’s speeches convey the king’s confused, violent state of mind. Shakespeare presents the audience with a man who is surrounded by anger, and a desire for revenge, but more positively, humility and a recognition of previous mistakes. Lear’s speeches in the storm, also reflect the movements of the storm. Lear’s opening line, is like a crack of thunder “Blow, winds, and crack your cheeks! Rage, blow” by using onomatopoeia On the Renaissance stage, the sound of thunder was created by rolling an iron ball on a sheet of metal, however Shakespeare is using Lear’s language to create the effects of the storm for the audience. Lear is the storm, his actions have led to misrule in the kingdom, and nature reflects that chaos. Shakespeare’s use of nature as a metaphor for the emotional turbulence within Lear, is effectively displayed in the speeches during the storm, “You sulph’rous and thought-executing fires, Vaunt- couriers of oak-cleaving thunderbolts.” Lear is encouraging the storm, to become even more violent and commanding the elements to bring about mass destruction. Lear’s phrase “oak-cleaving......

Words: 798 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Act 1: - How Does Priestley Create a Sense of Unease and Suggest That Mr Birling’s Optimism Is Unfounded?

...Act 1: - How does Priestley create a sense of unease and suggest that Mr Birling’s optimism is unfounded? As Act 1 of An Inspector Calls continues we see that Arthur Birling seems to be a confident and powerful man who is clearly anxious to be seen as a successful businessman and the head of his family. He is apparently very pleased with the way life is turning out for him and the other Birlings. Priestley sets the play in 1912 but it was first performed in 1945. He quite deliberately proceeds to make Mr Birling speak, in these first scenes of An Inspector Calls of events which the audience would know all about. A lot of what he dismisses as ‘wild talk’ and ‘nonsense’ actually happened. This gives Birling the appearance of foolishness and over-confidence as well as creating a sense of unease as the reader loses confidence and trust in Birling’s word. The writer has used dramatic irony to make Birling’s current position look very unstable. The first example of this is when he talks about the chance of further labour strikes. He states that “just because the miners came on strike, there’s a lot of wild talk about possible labour trouble in the near future. Don’t worry. We’ve passed the worst of it.” However there were many strikes in between 1912 and 1945 including the general strike in 1926. As this strike resulted in the country coming to a halt for nine days the fact that Birling is so complacent about this matter shows the audience how overconfident and......

Words: 808 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

To What Extent Does Pinter Use Comedy to Explore Human Relation in the Homecoming?

...The Homecoming, a two acts play, is sprinkled with diverse elements of comedy. By setting off laughing in the audience, Pinter drives the attention to the instability of characters’ relationships. Yet, the comedy darkens when facing the human perpetual struggle to handle these fragile relations. The Homecoming is articulated by comic cross-talking enlightening human relation. Thus the audience can be amused by the shouts of Teddy hoping to be listened to. The exclamations “She’s my wife! We’re married!” are vain, and even the silence imposed by the pause is not enough to be heard, he has to repeat himself. Pinter by creating this absurd and comic dialogue, in which nobody is listening to anyone, underlines the miscommunication that dominates human relations. If sometimes the protagonists seem to have a pertinent discussion, actions might reveal contradictions. For example, despite the clarity of Ruth’s brief refusal “No, thanks.”, Lenny “takes the glass to Ruth”. Along with inappropriate actions, the unsuitable and vulgar appellation “dirty tart” used by Max to designate his daughter in law creates an awkward mood, hilarious for the audience. Besides, Pinter introduces unexpected changes of topic. Whereas Ruth presents herself, Lenny cuts short by declaring “I’ve been having a bit of rough time with this clock”. The interest switching suddenly from Ruth to Lenny, punctuates the dialogue with off beats. These comic devices are used to reveal the misunderstanding messing up......

Words: 934 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

How Does Shakespeare Develop the Audience’s Understanding of Juliet’s Character and Her Predicament in Act 3 Scene 5?

...How does Shakespeare develop the audience’s understanding of Juliet’s character and her predicament in Act 3 Scene 5? At the start of III v when Juliet is talking to Romeo, Shakespeare shows their relationship with the use of natural imagery. For example he makes references to birds such as “Lark” and “Nightingale”. Shakespeare also uses natural locations such as “pomegranate tree” and “misty mountain tops”. The use of natural images is a metaphor for Romeo and Juliet’s love as it their love is natural and it was love at first sight. He also says in the prologue that they were “Star-crossed lovers” which means that their love was fate and that is was nature that dictated their love. .Shakespeare also uses the structure of the script to show the relationship between Romeo and Juliet. Romeo: How is’t, my soul? Let’s talk, it is not day Juliet: It is, it is, hie hence, be gone, away! (III v 25, 26) This symbolises how much Romeo and Juliet understand each other and how well they connect (They speak together and their conversations shows a structure). Shakespeare makes their relationship apparent through these techniques and it helps show how hard Romeo’s exile from Verona is going to be for Juliet after he leaves in the morning. As Romeo’s leaving Juliet says: “The window, let day in, and life out” (III v 41) In this line Juliet is saying farewell to Romeo and she’s saying now that day has......

Words: 1104 - Pages: 5