Premium Essay

Independence of the Judiciary in the United States

In: Historical Events

Submitted By ozmustafa
Words 2982
Pages 12
Judicial system can vary everywhere. Countries determine a judicial system based on their form of government. Islamic countries mainly adopt Sharia law or Islamic legal system, for instance; Sharia law system is applied in Iran. Another example, in former ottoman, Islamic legal system was substantially implemented depending on Quran, Sunnah, ijma and ijtihad, but especially after the Tanzimat Edict in 1839, the Ottoman Empire gradually began to adopt European law (beginning of democratization); on the other hand, there is independence of the judicial system due to the separation of powers in democratic countries. Separation of powers is an indispensable part of the democratic countries. Separation of powers consists of legislative, executive and judiciary. Briefly, duty of legislative makes the laws. Duty of executive implements the laws. Another part of the separation of powers; judiciary makes trial depending on the law. Judiciary is the most important organ of the separation of powers, and independence of the judiciary is essential in democratic countries. What is independence of the judiciary? Independence of the judiciary is basically separately from the legislative and executive branches . So, what is the level of independent judgment in democratic countries? We will talk about the American legal and judicial system in this article.
American legal system was adopted in 1789; it governs according to the constitution of the United States. All the rules of the legal system are established in the constitution such as the operation of courts, assignment of judges, their salaries and duties etc. America consists of 50 provinces, and America's legal system was also determined in a manner that protects of independence of the all provinces. Firstly, let’s talk about the appointments and salaries of judges. Assignment is done by political institutions (the United...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Court System

...Overview of the United States and Mexico Court Systems “Court system the judiciary also known as the judicial system or judicature is the system of courts that interprets and applies the law in the name of the sovereign or state” ( Freedman, 2000). The judiciary provides a mechanism for the resolution of disputes. Purposes and responsibilities of courts require balance between external and internal accountability. Courts do not serve their enduring purposes or continuing responsibilities unless their structure, governance, operations, programs, processes, and performance lead to the reality and deserved public perception that the judiciary is accountable. The courts’ responsibility for the proper use of public money is to ensure rule of law, equal protection and due process, individual justice in individual cases, and the appearance of individual justice in individual cases. In the United States, judicial branches of the federal and state governments are charged with the application and interpretation of the law. The U.S. court system is divided into two administratively separate systems: the federal and the state. Each of these systems are independent of the executive and legislative branches of government. Such a dual court system is a heritage of the colonial period. “By the time the U.S....

Words: 1226 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay


...In a state that recognizes the importance of constitutionalism, the leaders are bound to observe both limitations of power and the procedures which are set out in the supreme constitutional law of the community. Constitutionalism ensures that governmental powers are limited beyond theory, and in practice. Constitutionalism goes beyond a good constitution and beyond constitutionality of governmental action or a country’s laws.Constitutionalism is a concept associated with the political theories of John Loce and the founders of the American republic and equated with the concept of regular juris, which means the Rule of law. Carl J. Friedrich,explains that , “ Constitutionalism by dividing power provides a system of effective restraints upon the governmental action. In studying it one has to explore methods and techniques by which such restraints are established and maintained. It is a body of rules ensuring fairplay, thus rendering the...

Words: 1606 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Separation of Powers

...If it is, how does UK prevent the abuse of powers if there is no strict separation of powers between the Executive, Legislative and the Judiciary? John Locke’s conception of “where-ever law ends, tyranny begins” can be linked inextricably with the ideology of separation of powers. To elaborate on that, if one were to take advantage of the authority given to him by law, oppression would be deemed unavoidable. Hence, the establishment of the political theory, separation of power, seeks to...

Words: 3248 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

Democracy and Bangladesh

...The country gained its independence through both the democratic process and through war. During the four decades of its existence as a nation-state it has endured spells of military and non-military rules. Of the latter all were not elected. The elected governments seemed to betray superficial practices of democracy. In Bangladesh today, we have a situation where 153 members of the parliament out of a total of 300 have been elected uncontested. Obviously it means that more than half of the population of the country would not have any say in the election of the next parliament. It is also obvious that if there is no opponent, the lone candidate would be elected and it would...

Words: 4914 - Pages: 20

Premium Essay


..."We the people of the United States". Which clearly indicated the soverignty of the people. (IV)SUPREMACY OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: The Constitution of U.S. is the basic law of the country to quote Constitution itself. "This Constitution and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance there of ............ shall be the Supreme Law of the land. (V)CONVENTIONS: Conventions played an important role in the development of the Constitution and they are also the basic featur of the U.S. Constitution e.g. the growth of the cabinet of the American President is the result of convention. (VI)RIGID: American Constitution is a rigid Constitution because requires a special procedure to amend it. Every amendment, which can be moved in two different ways, must be ratified by the three-fourths of the state will be and elected one. (VII)REPUBLICAN: The U.S. Constitution guarantees to every state a republican form of Government the head of every state will...

Words: 1171 - Pages: 5

Free Essay


...The Japanese promised to declare independence in certain South East Asian countries. The Japanese Victory The Japanese military conquered Malaya quite easily although the British military was equipped with better firearms and were greater in number than the Japanese There are a few lessons to be learnt from this. 1. The British were not prepared for the war. They did not anticipate the Japanese attack from the north. 2. The fact was the Japanese had a comprehensive plan in which they had a network of spies in Malaya. 3. In addition to that, the Japanese soldiers were in excellent form because of intensive training and were led by capable and experience leaders (such as Yamashita and Tsuji). 4. The Japanese were enthusiastic and inspired to fight for the importance and supremacy of Japan. 5. Furthermore, they had practical war tactics, such as using the bicycle even in the jungles and villages. 6. The British military on the other hand, lacked the spirit f war, especially after the first round of attacks. 7. Also, a large number of the British soldiers consisted of Indians who were still young and inexperienced in warfare. * All...

Words: 8065 - Pages: 33

Premium Essay


...The central government does not take full control of the relationships of the nation but there is sharing of command between the governments at national and state levels. The Federal association has members from diverse groups represented by their heads and leaders and are held together by a required covenant. (Wilson/Diiulio/Bose,2014) Before the political system was in place today, the colonies was later formed the United States have their own government and political system based on the traditions and culture of its citizens. Before the alliance, every state exercises its own command governed by laws unique to its citizens that may be not practically relevant to the other states (Bohm & Haley, 2007). The birth of United States as an integrated nation brought changes to the system. Federal government evolved following the creation and implementation of the United States Constitution. The state governments were not abolished with the conference that states will partially lose their sovereignty or independence. (Wilson/Diiulio/Bose,2014) American Federalism ever since then has been observed constitutionally conceding the national and state governments to apply their exclusive powers but also mandatory to share in other powers. For example, the power to print money, declare war, enter treaties with international government, and handle international affairs has been settled to the federal government (Longley, n.d.)....

Words: 1044 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Laws1006 Essay Semester 1 2010

...It requires the recognition of Parliamentary sovereignty, and furthermore it calls for the preservation of the principles of rule of law, judicial independence and more importantly the rights of all individuals. Although the Government’s recently launched National Human Rights Framework promises a selection of human rights protection mechanisms, in light of its failure to provide a bill of rights that many Australians want, it is an inadequate attempt at promoting and protecting the more vulnerable groups. Even though the Framework claims that it reserves the function of statutory interpretation for the courts, in reality it empowers the Parliament with the capacity to “guide”[1] the courts into enacting legislation. The Government’s downplay of judicial influence cannot be ignored and this points to a discussion of whether Australia needs a bill of rights. The role of the courts also need to be evaluated with respect to the other branches of government, the legislature and the Executive, in an effort to attain a healthy balance between judicial independence and Parliamentary sovereignty for the people of Australia, and to bring to an end the ongoing debate of whether Australia really needs a bill of rights. To begin with, consider the Framework’s initiatives. The first objective “reaffirms” the government’s commitment to international treaties. This is beneficial in the sense that certain legislations are implemented...

Words: 3956 - Pages: 16

Free Essay

Court Systems

...Court System Introduction The purpose of this paper is to make the reader aware about the significance of the history of judicial system prevailing within the premises of United States. This paper intends to explore the Court System of United States. The major historical developments in the courts of United States will be discussed. Moreover, the rationale of the dual court system of the United States will be outlined. This paper will also explore the correlation between the historical developments and the dual court system of the United States. Discussion The development of the state courts within United States can be traced back from the colonial period. Every state in United States organizes its court system independently. Every state has been provided with the right to choose its own organizational structures and the possible jurisdictions of their respective courts. Various types of courts have been developed throughout the history of United States. The federal level states have trial courts normally called district courts and circuit courts which are the appellate tribunals. In New York most of the trial courts are considered supreme courts (Columbia Encyclopedia, 2007). The development of court system started in the colonial period. Local judges were called magistrates on the lowest level of their colonial judiciary. By the early eighteenth century, the development of formal courts started....

Words: 1195 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Federalism in Usa

...The state governments were not abolished with the conference that states will partially lose their sovereignty or independence. (Wilson/Diiulio/Bose,2014) American Federalism ever since then has been observed constitutionally conceding...

Words: 1185 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Pdf, the Constitution

...HIS/115 US HISTORY TO 1865 Professor David Glauber Concerlo Cuthbertson University of Phoenix How the Constitution addressed the complaints in the Declaration of Independence: The United States Constitution was established to help set-up the first form of government, in the year 1787, and the Bill of Rights was later added in the year 1791. The Constitution was established for the common good of all people. The Constitution and Amendments were written to fix the problems stated in the Declaration of Independence which was written in the year 1776. The United States Constitution reflects and supports the idea of the Declaration of Independence. Many different problems from the Declaration of Independence needed to be fixed through the Constitution.”He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good”. (Declaration of Independence) The King of Great Britain refused to set laws for the common good of all people. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and to petition the Government. So according to the first amendment, the people’s common good is protected by Congress....

Words: 762 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Uoi V R. Gandhi/ Madras Bar Association V Uoi: Case Analysis

...UOI v R. Gandhi/ Madras Bar Association v UOI, (2010) 2 Comp LJ 577 (SC). Author’s Name: Aditi Tambi Registration Number: 11A008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction………………………………………………………………..2 Rule of Law…………………………………………………………………4 Separation of Power……………………………………………………….6 Development of Tribunalisation in India………………………………..8 UOI v R.Gandhi……………………………………………………………....10 * Facts………………………………………………………………....10 * Issues………………………………………………………………...12 * Contentions of Petitioner………………………………………….12 * Contentions of Respondent………………………………………...13 * Provisions of Law in Question……………………………………...13 * Judgment……………………………………………………………...15 Conclusion………………………………………………………..20 INTRODUCTION The author in the in this project will deal with the case for and against the Tribunalisation of company law in India. The following discussion culminates from the Constitutional Bench Judgment of the Supreme Court that upheld the establishment of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), in an appeal filed by the Union of India against a Madras High Court judgment. The case in discussion is Union of India v. R. Gandhi / Madras Bar Association v UOI. What was effectively held in the judgment was to uphold the legislative competence of the Parliament to create the NCLT and NCLAT. In the present case, upon recommendations of Eradi Committee, constituted to suggest measures to avoid unnecessary delay in litigation,......

Words: 7805 - Pages: 32

Premium Essay

Constitution Paper

...The Article III, Section 2, Clause 3 addressed the depriving the citizens of the United States in criminal cases the benefits of a trial by jury. This meant that anyone accused of a crime had the right to a trial by jury, except in the case of impeachments. Article III all together addressed the establishing of judiciary powers. The U.S. Constitution was created to correct the major weaknesses of the...

Words: 667 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay


...The administration is suffering from a new denial syndrome, pretending that the over-a-decade-long crisis of the judiciary which plunged the credibility, reputation and legitimacy of the system of justice in Malaysia to an all-time low when the international judicial and legal community issued its terrible indictment in a report entitled “Justice in Jeopardy: Malaysia 2000” had not happened or was history and could never recur in the future. At the 12th Malaysian Law Conference in December 2003, former Finance Minister, Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah quoted an anecdote in the nineties to illustrate his lack confidence in the Malaysian system of justice, how he was advised by his lawyer and a former Supreme Court judge “that it would be very difficult to get justice in my own country, especially when my adversaries were closely connected to the powers that be” and not to resort to the Malaysian courts when his political enemies alleged that he was responsible for the BMF scandal. But “the opportunity came when the same allegation was published in a number of foreign newspapers” and he hesitated no longer and filed actions in the appropriate foreign courts against those newspapers and cleared his name. Let me add my anecdote....

Words: 794 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Inspirations of the Founding Fathers

...Peter Craine AP Government Summer Assignment It’s no secret that the United States of America is the freest, most lawful, and most democratic nation in this world’s history. This is reflected absolutely in the documents that set the law of the land, written by our founding fathers. The Declaration of Independence and the Virginia Declaration of Rights represent the idea that “all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness”, while our Constitution encourages a “separation of powers” that keeps the governing bodies from assuming total control over the governed. Some of these ideas are also highlighted in Thomas Paine’s Common Sense, which was written as a means to convince the citizens of the colonies to secede from the oppressive Great Britain. While we take great pride in the fact that the likes of Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and George Mason employed these ideas in the forging of the United States, these ideas were not their own. In fact, they were utilized by men that existed long before the founding fathers were born. Men like John Locke, Charles de Montesquieu, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau held these beliefs and articulated them in many of their works, which the founders would use centuries later as references in the drafting of our founding documents....

Words: 1352 - Pages: 6