Free Essay

Index Fund

In: Business and Management

Submitted By saeedgr8
Words 3426
Pages 14
INDEX FUNDS.. FM n FS PROJECT
Active and Passive Management
Before we get into the details of index funds, it's important to understand the two different styles of mutual-fund management: passive and active.

Most mutual funds fit under the active management category. Active management involves the art of stock picking and market timing. This means the fund manager will put his/her skills to the test trying to pick securities that will perform better than the market. Because actively managed funds require more hands-on research and because they experience a higher volume of trading, their expenses are higher.

Passively managed funds, on the other hand, do not attempt to beat the market. A passive strategy instead seeks to match the risk and return of the stock market or a segment of it. You can think of passive management as the buy-and-hold approach to money management.

Defn-
An index fund a collective investment scheme that aims to replicate the movements of an index of a specific financial market, or a set of rules of ownership that are held constant, regardless of market condition.
An index fund is a mutual fund which merely invests in the securities in the index. It is passive, in the sense that absolutely no effort is made to produce results better than the index.

HISTORY: Index funds haven't been around forever -- how did they come about?
Long ago, there was a student at the University of Chicago who studied modern ideas of finance taught by Eugene Fama and others. After graduating, he returned to his father's company (Samsonite) and was horrified at the active management being attempted by their pension fund. He telephoned his teachers at Chicago and asked for help, and they pointed him to a fledgling quantitative finance group coming up at Wells Fargo Bank. Thus was born the first index fund, with a modest sum of $6 million.
What index did they use?
At that time, the picture had not really clarified on indexes. They started off with a "equally weighted index", which shows the returns obtained by spreading the funds equally across all the components in the index. This turns out to be an extremely clumsy index for the purpose of index funds, because every time prices move, the index fund has to trade in order to rebalance the portfolio, back to equal weights.
It was some time later that the "market capitalisation weighted" index was connected up with index funds. This turned out to be perfect in the sense that when prices changed, market capitalisations changed proportionately. Hence a fund that was locked into the index portfolio yesterday "automatically" stayed on the index portfolio today, without any need for trading. Indexing methods
[edit] Traditional indexing
Indexing is traditionally known as the practice of owning a representative collection of securities, in the same ratios as the target index. Modification of security holdings happens only when companies periodically enter or leave the target index.
[edit] Synthetic indexing
Synthetic indexing is a modern technique of using a combination of equity index futures contracts and investments in low risk bonds to replicate the performance of a similar overall investment in the equities making up the index. Although maintaining the future position has a slightly higher cost structure than traditional passive sampling, synthetic indexing can result in more favourable tax treatment, particularly for international investors who are subject to U.S. dividend withholding taxes. The bond portion can hold higher yielding instruments, with a trade-off of corresponding higher risk, a technique referred to as enhanced indexing.
[edit] Enhanced indexing
Enhanced indexing is a catch-all term referring to improvements to index fund management that emphasize performance, possibly using active management. Enhanced index funds employ a variety of enhancement techniques, including customized indexes (instead of relying on commercial indexes), trading strategies, exclusion rules, and timing strategies. The cost advantage of indexing could be reduced or eliminated by employing active management.
[edit] Operating indexing
Indexing Operating Performance is a method of measuring and comparing a company's performance in terms of financial metrics against the financial performance of other comparable companies (so called peers or peer universe).

Advantages:
Low costs
Because the composition of a target index is a known quantity, it costs less to run an index fund. No highly paid stock pickers or analysts are needed. Typically expense ratios of an index fund ranges from 0.15% for U.S. Large Company Indexes to 0.97% for Emerging Market Indexes. The expense ratio of the average large cap actively managed mutual fund as of 2005 is 1.36%. If a mutual fund produces 10% return before expenses, taking account of the expense ratio difference would result in an after expense return of 9.85% for the large cap index fund versus 8.64% for the actively managed large cap fund.
[edit] Simplicity
The investment objectives of index funds are easy to understand. Once an investor knows the target index of an index fund, what securities the index fund will hold can be determined directly. Managing one's index fund holdings may be as easy as rebalancing every six months or every year.
[edit] Lower turnovers
Turnover refers to the selling and buying of securities by the fund manager. Selling securities in some jurisdictions may result in capital gains tax charges, which are sometimes passed on to fund investors. Because index funds are passive investments, the turnovers are lower than actively managed funds. According to a study conducted by John Bogle over a sixteen-year period, investors get to keep only 47% of the cumulative return of the average actively managed mutual fund, but they keep 87% in a market index fund. This means $10,000 invested in the index fund grew to $90,000 vs. $49,000 in the average actively managed stock mutual fund. That is a 40% gain from the reduction of silent partners.[citation needed]
[edit] No style drift
Style drift occurs when actively managed mutual funds go outside of their described style (i.e. mid-cap value, large cap income, etc.) to increase returns. Such drift hurts portfolios that are built with diversification as a high priority. Drifting into other styles could reduce the overall portfolio's diversity and subsequently increase risk. With an index fund, this drift is not possible and accurate diversification of a portfolio is increased.

Disadvantages
[edit] Possible tracking error from index
Since index funds aim to match market returns, both under- and over-performance compared to the market is considered a "tracking error". For example, an inefficient index fund may generate a positive tracking error in a falling market by holding too much cash, which holds its value compared to the market.
According to The Vanguard Group, a well run S&P 500 index fund should have a tracking error of 5 basis points or less, but a Morningstar survey found an average of 38 basis points across all index funds.[5]
[edit] Cannot outperform the target index
By design, an index fund seeks to match rather than outperform the target index. Therefore, a good index fund with low tracking error will not generally outperform the index, but rather produces a rate of return similar to the index minus fund costs.
[edit] Index composition changes reduce return
Whenever an index changes, the fund is faced with the prospect of selling all the stock that has been removed from the index, and purchasing the stock that was added to the index. The S&P 500 index has a typical turnover of between 1% and 9% per year.[6]
In effect, the index, and consequently all funds tracking the index, are announcing ahead of time the trades that they are planning to make. As a result, the price of the stock that has been removed from the index tends to be driven down, and the price of stock that has been added to the index tends to be driven up, in part due to arbitrageurs, in a practice known as "index front running".[7] The index fund, however, has suffered market impact costs because they had to sell stock whose price was depressed, and buy stock whose price was inflated. These losses can be considered small, however, relative to an index fund's overall advantage gained by low costs.
Internationally, how important are index funds?
In one way or the other, around one-third of professionally run portfolios in the US are index funds. There are stock market indexes of various kinds, bond index funds, industry indexes, indexes built of low P/B companies, etc. A variety of products can be created using these indexes. Leveraged index funds, index funds that promise to juice up returns using index arbitrage, index funds which "tilt" towards specified factors, etc., are all classes of products that can be created off a core family of good indexes.
Many actively managed funds are actually heavy users of indexation in disguise: they park 80% of their money in an index, and try to juice up their returns by doing active management on the remaining 20%.
Finally, all funds, whether they use index funds or not, are subjected to performance evaluation procedures that are based on indexes. In this sense, the indexation industry is truly pervasive.

Why is all this so important? Or, what's so compelling about index funds that they should account for one-third of professionally managed funds in the US?
There are really three issues why indexation is so crucial: 1. The reason mentioned above, which is that active managers haven't been able to perform too well. Hence, passive management is the natural alternative. 2. Suppose one does want to do active management. For a large fund, it is pointless to take small positions in a few stocks based on stock picking -- this can't affect the fund NAV appreciably. And, if the fund attempts to buy large quantities of what it thinks are undervalued stocks, then the impact cost faced upon purchase generally wipes out the extra returns that are derived from the underpricing.
Hence the way forward for active management is to shift focus away from individual stocks to entire sectors of stocks. Suppose you think that the cement industry is undervalued, then buy the entire cement industry index. You could easily invest Rs.5 to Rs.10 crore at under 1% impact cost on buying the entire cement industry index over a few days. Such large positions are infeasible on individual stocks at low impact costs.
Many kinds of sectors of stocks could be used for such active management: industry indexes, a low P/E index, bond market index, etc. Active managers of the future will work by juggling their proportions of these sectors, instead of devoting effort on identifying individual stocks which are undervalued -- that is more of a retail activity better suited for people with very small funds to invest. 3. Finally, index funds have thrived because of situations where a committee invests on behalf of a constituency. An example of this is a provident fund committee which is investing the PF money on behalf of all employees.
It is extremely embarassing for the PF committee to pick an active manager who then turns out to underperform. It is much easier for the PF committee to face their constituency and say "we just picked an index fund, and the overall index went down, hence our fund value dropped".
PASSIVE WAY: That is why index funds are also referred to as passively managed funds. This is different from how actively managed funds function; they also have a benchmark index but make active stock and sector calls in their bid to outperform the index.
This is the primary difference between passive funds and active funds; one is content at giving index-linked returns, while the other consciously tries to outperform it.
In their attempt to outperform the index, active funds diverge from index funds on two important counts -- volatility and expenses. Lets take volatility first -- when active funds invest outside the index they take on stock and sector risk that are usually higher than risks associated with an index fund. This reflects by way of a higher turbulence in performance vis-à-vis index funds.
When index funds make sense Fund name | Management style | Benchmark index | Expense ratio | FIDELITY SPARTAN 500 INDEX | Index | S&P 500 | 0.10% | VANGUARD 500 INDEX FUND | Index | S&P 500 | 0.18% | FIDELITY CAPITAL APPRECIATION | Active | S&P 500 | 0.94% | VANGUARD GROWTH & INCOME | Active | S&P 500 | 0.42% |
(Data sourced from fund house websites)

When index funds do not make sense Fund name | Management style | Benchmark index | Expense ratio | FT INDIA INDEX NIFTY | Index | S&P Nifty | 1.00 | FT INDIA INDEX SENSEX | Index | BSE Sensex | 1.00 | HDFC [ Get Quote ] INDEX FUND (NIFTY) | Index | S&P Nifty | 1.50 | HDFC INDEX (SENSEX) | Index | BSE Sensex | 1.50 | HDFC INDEX (SENSEX PLUS) | Index | BSE Sensex | 1.50 | FRANKLIN BLUECHIP | Active | BSE Sensex | 1.90 | HDFC EQUITY FUND | Active | S&P CNX 500 | 2.02 |
In fact, HDFC Sensex expense ratio does not even compare favourably to HDFC Sensex Plus' expense ratio (1.50%), despite the fact that the latter has an element of active fund management to the extent of 20% of net assets.
If one looks at the index funds from the two fund houses we have selected - HDFC Mutual Fund and Franklin Templeton; at expense ratios of 1.50% and 1.00% (respectively), the disparity is too sharp, for the same fund management style. HDFC Mutual Fund's index funds are too expensive
Indian Scenario
In India, the index funds are based on the two popular indexes, NSE 50 Nifty and BSE 30 Sensex. Unfortunately, index funds in India haven’t seen the expected growth ever since their launch six years ago. The oldest index fund of UTI has delivered only 6.77% on returns since June 1998. This is primarily because of the fact that very few people in India actually invest in the index funds as investing in stocks has become a usual habit for them. Also as against the plethora of indices available in the international market, India has just two popular indices, Nifty and Sensex. This greatly restricts the options available to an Indian investor interested in investing in index funds. This has even led some to opine that probably the time for index funds is yet to arrive in India. Only the time to come will tell whether index funds are able to meet the expectations or not. TRACKING ERROR: The lack of active management generally gives the advantage of lower fees and lower taxes in taxable accounts. Of course, the fees reduce the return to the investor relative to the index. In addition it is usually impossible to precisely mirror the index as the models for sampling and mirroring, by their nature, cannot be 100% accurate. The difference between the index performance and the fund performance is known as the "tracking error" or informally "jitter".
Thus the real challenge of running an index fund lies in execution. The fund manager has to strive to make sure that the fund NAV closely tracks the reported index levels. This requires considerable skill in execution. It would be extremely embarassing to report to a customer that the index has risen by 10% but the index fund NAV has only risen by 9% (from the customers point of view, this could even be owing to fraud). The error between index returns and index fund returns is called tracking error. Different index fund managers compete on promising as low a tracking error as possible.
Article in hindu business line:
IF YOU believe that the Sensex or the Nifty are about to break from the past and sail ahead of their all-time highs, investing in index funds may appear to be a tempting prospect now. But one should first consider investing in actively managed, diversified equity funds with a good long-term record.
For investors with a healthy appetite for risk (you need one to stay invested in the markets at these levels), actively managed funds such as Franklin India Bluechip Fund, Templeton India Growth Fund, HDFC Equity Fund may be among the options to consider.
Modest show: There was a significant divergence in the performance of index funds in 2003. In a surprising trend, most of the index funds which tracked the Sensex trailed those which track the Nifty by a significant margin.
This is surprising because 2003 was a year in which the Sensex, with returns of 74.5 per cent marginally outperformed the Nifty, which returned 73.8 per cent.
One explanation for the significant tracking error on the Sensex funds could be the substantial changes in the Sensex constituents this year. With the Sensex changing over to a free float index, index fund managers were probably forced to replace a significant portion of their portfolio enhancing transaction and impact costs. Within the Sensex tracking funds, Franklin Templeton Index fund, had the lowest return of 66.1 per cent, while UTI's Master Index Fund had the highest return of 76.8 per cent.
Within the Nifty funds, most funds registered a positive tracking error, notching returns that were up to 4 percentage points higher than the Nifty's returns. Here, the returns ranged from 72.9 per cent on the Nifty Benchmark exchange traded fund to 78.6 per cent on the Franklin Templeton Index Fund-Nifty plan.
Investors in the index funds which paid out dividends during the year, faced with an opportunity loss. Having pulled out part of their funds mid-way during the rally, they are likely to have earned lower returns than those who stayed invested.
Easily beaten: In 2003, as in the preceding bull markets, index funds have been beaten by the majority of actively managed funds. About 7 out of every 10 active equity funds , beat the narrow market indices such as the Sensex or Nifty.
What is more, the margin by which diversified funds have beaten the index funds is large. While the best performing index fund (tracking the Nifty or Sensex), managed a return of 78.5 per cent, the top performing equity fund (Franklin India Prima Fund), managed a return of 165 per cent. Prima Fund benefited from its mid-cap focus.
But even funds with a large-cap bias, such as the Franklin India Bluechip Fund, Templeton India Growth Fund and HDFC Equity Fund have generated return of over 100 per cent in 2003, easily outpacing the indices.
Downside protection: Index funds are usually believed to offer better protection from a downside in markets than actively managed funds. As the argument goes, if you are invested in an index fund, your downside is restricted to the fall in index levels.
But if a fund manager has aggressively picked stocks outside of the index, there is a possibility of the NAV falling much more than the index.
In the past, this has been observed in the Indian markets as well. The majority of active funds outpaced the Sensex and the Nifty in the bull market of 1999. But during the market reversal of 2000, the majority of actively managed equity funds lost more value than the indices, some losing as much as 60 per cent of their NAV. This would seem to suggest that investors seeking downside protection should switch to index funds.
But this logic may not hold good this time round. For one, some of the big losses on equity fund NAVs in 2000 were due to concentration in IT, media and telecom stocks. But most equity funds today have rigid ceilings on their stock and sector specific exposures. Equity fund portfolios thus sport a more diversified look, which may help restrict the losses in the event of a market reversal.
Second, given the sharp run-up across the range of stocks over the past year, generating returns from the current levels would seem to call for some careful stock picking. Therefore, careful stock selection may deliver better returns going forward, than passively staying with the index stocks.

In bull markets when returns are high these ratios are not as noticeable for investors; however, when bear markets come around, the higher expense ratios become more conspicuous as they are directly deducted from meager returns. For example, if the return on a mutual fund is 10% and the expense ratio is 3%, then the real return to the investor is only 7%.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Index Fund

...investors invest in index-tracker funds rather than actively-managed funds? Topic 2 : Should retail investors invest in index-tracker funds rather than actively-managed funds In recent years, investment has been interested by the majority of people more than in the past as basically everyone would like generate income and try to find the ways that can actually make money. Not only do investors need to know more knowledge that how to make money investing, but also they have to update news which has information about money’s movement. Moreover, the majority of investors is supposed to follow international news and monitor that show their money in real time. In today’s world, there are many capital markets for investing because if the number of investors increases, it will make the number of investment products in the capital market increased. Thus, investors in these days are supposed to have the way in order to choose which stock will make them make the most investment return. Then, there are two investing’s types in funds for retail investors in order to invest between index- tracker funds and actively- managed funds and most investors are supposed to understand and know which one they have to use. This essay will be discussed investing in index-tracker funds and actively-managed funds that follow by pros and cons, and also provide knowledge that why are retail investors supposed to put their money in index-tracker funds rather than in actively-managed funds. First and...

Words: 1732 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Index Funds

...An "index fund" describes a type of mutual fund or investment trust whose investment objective typically is to achieve approximately the same return as a particular market index. An Exchange Traded Index Fund is a security that tracks an index, a commodity or a basket of assets like an index fund, but trades like a stock on an exchange. ETIFs experience price changes throughout the day as they are bought and sold. ETIFs, commonly referred to as index-based ETFs, are designed to track the performance of their specified indexes or, in some cases, a multiple of inverses of their indexes. Some people will agree that international investments is good. It allows investors to reduce the risk of their portfolio, but still allowing them with additional profit potentail. If you have the money to spend you would suggest that you invest in international investments. The return and the risk of an investment will depend on the actual currency that was used. The exchange Traded Funds passive nature is a necessity: the funds rely on an arbitrage mechanism to keep the prices at which they trade roughly in line with the net asset values of their underlying portfolios. For the mechanism to work, potential arbitragers need to have full, timely knowledge of a fund's holdings. ETFs are different from Mutual funds in the sense that ETF units are not sold to the public for cash. Instead, the Asset Management Company that sponsors the ETF (Fund) takes the shares of companies comprising the...

Words: 688 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Should Retail Investors Invest in Index-Tracker Funds Rather Than Actively-Managed Funds?

...Should retail investors invest in index-tracker funds rather than actively-managed funds? As we all know that there are two main institutional investments which are index fund and actively managed fund. However, it seems to be a hard problem when a retail investor who wants to make an institutional investment, perhaps most of them do not know which one deserve their investment. Index funds refers to a kind of fund buying all or part of securities according to a standard formed by certain index, which aims to achieve the same level of returns of following the returns , and catch up the market growth at the same time. The index fund is a kind of passive management fund which is just opposite to the actively management fund. There are many characteristics of index fund. 1, Index Investing uses passive operation of tracking the benchmark index, which can make the costs of the fund's operating and transaction into a minimum. Portfolio strategy can be adjusted by According to the change of the index’s Composition, and what’s more, no fees will be paid about the investment research and analysis. So a lower management fee will be charged. On the other hand, the index investors tend to buy long-term holders of stocks, as opposed to active management by actively trading the formation of high turnover and must pay higher transaction costs, the investment of index funds does not take any adjustment to the investment portfolio initiatively, and the low cost of turnover transaction will...

Words: 1968 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Your 401(K) Account at East Coast Yachts

...Your 401(k) Account At East Coast Yachts 1. The implications that can be drawn from the given graph are: a. The actively managed funds have consistently outperformed the low fee index funds over the past decade of January 1977 through December 1986. b. Although the economic conditions over the decade in review is not mentioned in the case study, based on the fluctuations in the up and down cycles in the funds return suggest that it is following the economic cycle of the given time period. This trend is also apparent in the S&P 500 over the same time periods which offered a return of 1.09% over the decade. (Yahoo Finance, 2012). 2. The graph is not consistent with market efficiency. The efficient market hypothesis states that an investor cannot consistently outperform the market over a long period of time. To consider the market efficient all respected information should be made public and reflected in the current price of the asset (Ross, Westerfield, and Jaffe, 2010). According to the Case Study graph, the actively of the managed funds have consistently outperformed the broader market including the S&P 500 over the given time period. According to Ross, Westerfield and Jaffe (2010), Public skepticism of market efficiency is due to fluctuations in the day to day stock prices. These fluctuations however are not inconsistent with efficiency. Stocks in an efficient market will adjust to new market and economic data by changes in the stock...

Words: 375 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Active Portfolio Management: Country vs. Sector Characteristics

...Active Portfolio Management: Country vs. Sector Characteristics Executive Summary This project sets out to invest between 7bn and 9bn Euros for a large pension fund in European equities, chosen from the MSCI Europe Index, which also serves as the benchmark to measure performance against. Two portfolios need to be created, one to reflect asset allocation focussed on countries and the other on sectors, with the number of assets in each portfolio being no more than 150. Both portfolios must be actively managed, having at least an active risk of 3% when compared to the benchmark. To achieve this, I followed a three step top-down approach for our investment decision process. Firstly, I started with an analysis of the macroeconomic environment in Europe, followed by forming opinions on the relative strengths and weaknesses of the constituent countries and sectors, using the macro-analysis to determine which are most likely to perform well, given the long-run trends identified. Finally, I invested in all mid-cap companies within the selected countries and sectors, based on our judgement that middle sized firms are poised to prosper the most in this difficult economic environment, which I predict to remain tough for the foreseeable future. After finalising the initial portfolios in this way, I used BarraOne to optimise them. Following optimisation, I compared the risk profile of each portfolio to the benchmark. Our findings show that an actively managed portfolio, especially one constrained...

Words: 4671 - Pages: 19

Premium Essay

Investure Llc and Smith College

...pertinence for TW to recommend to its clients the Research Affiliate Financial Index (RAFI) strategy over traditional indexing and over a more actively managed strategy. The RAFI is presented to Tower Watson as a new efficient B2B tool to invest, to help investment advisory firms to better establish their strategy. Indeed this index is based on fundamental criteria instead of market capitalization criteria (and thus it has an economic-centric view instead of a market-centric view). It has been proved through studies that portfolio weights decided by fundamentals are more reliable than by price. This interesting strategy, halfway between active and passive, has shown some significant higher returns over the past years, a fact that many pension funds have already noticed since the trend today for these funds is to invest more and more in passively traded funds. Even if such strategies seem to increase the investment exposure to market fluctuation they can still be considered as “smart-beta” strategies. In the end we will have understood that TW should follow that investment tendency and purchase RAFI’s license to offer a better performing investment strategy to its pension clients, keeping in mind that one should not invest all its AUM on a passive strategy but should rather diversify its portfolio between active and passive investment strategies. 2 Case Study Questions 1. What is the role of pension fund consultants such as Towers Watson (TW) towards their clients? What criteria...

Words: 3129 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

Beta Management Case

...Beta Management Company July 21, 2014 Variable Measures | |Vanguard Index 500 Trust |California R.E.I.T. |Brown Group | |Standard Deviation |4.61% |9.23% |8.17% | |Expected Return |1.10% |-2.27% |-0.67% | | |Vanguard & California R.E.I.T. |Vanguard & Brown Group | |Beta |14.121% |111.488% | |Correlation Coefficient |0.0735 |0.6562 | In evaluating the risk characteristics on a stand-alone basis, we can conclude that Brown Group offers a better return than California R.E.I.T. as well as a more stable standard deviation. When considering standard deviation as a measure of risk, the higher the deviation, the higher the risk that exists. Although the expected return for both Brown Group and California R.E.I.T. are both negative, Brown Groups expected return of -0.67%, in addition to its lower standard deviation than that of California...

Words: 1440 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Alex Sharpe's Portfolio Solution

...Context: Alex Sharpe currently invests her children’s educational savings in Vanguard 500 Index Fund, which tracks the performance of S&P 500 and is passively managed. However, she is now considering switching her investment strategy to a more active one to achieve better outcomes. Hasbro, a toy manufacturer, and Reynolds, a tobacco firm, have come into Sharpe’s sight and she wants to choose one of them and invest a small proportion of equity funds in it. In order to select a more appropriate investment target, the following issues should be taken into consideration by Sharpe: 1) What are the risk-return characteristics of each stock 2) What are the impacts of either stock to the overall risk-return profiles of the equity portfolio Analysis: 1. Suppose Sharpe's position had been 99 percent of equity funds invested in the S&P500 and either one percent in Reynolds or one percent in Hasbro. Estimate the resulting portfolio position. How does each stock affect the variability of the equity investment? Which stock appears to be the riskiest? Let A (and B) be the portfolio with 99% of S&P 500 and 1% of Reynolds (and 1% Hasbro). | S&P 500 | Reynolds | Hasbro | Portfolio A | Portfolio B | Mean Return | 0.5743% | 1.8748% | 1.1838% | 0.5873% | 0.5804% | Std Dev | 3.6017% | 9.3665% | 8.1158% | 3.5933% | 3.6174% | According to our calculation, Portfolio A is a better choice with higher expected return (0.5873%) and lower standard deviation (3.5933%)...

Words: 1242 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

What Is Strategy 中文版

...Michael E. Porter) positioning 20 1 hypercompetition 20 operational effectiveness strategy 80 time-based competition reengineering productivity frontier strategic positioning 2 Lotus Notes 10 50 R.R. Donnelley & Sons Quebecor Color Press Flower Press Wo r l d Big learning organization 20 80 1995 7% 20 80 4.6% 3 competitive convergence zero-sum competition Southwest Airlines Company 20 70 80 Sony Canon Sega 20 80 Hirotaka Takeuchi Mariko Sakakibara 4 15 25 5 737 6 8 Ikea 5 Jiffy Lube International variety-based positioning mutual fund CarMax Circuit City Stores CarMax 6 Vanguard Group index fund Citibank 25 lender Bessemer Trust needs-based positioning Company 500 1:125 14 7 Carmike Cinemas 20 access-based positioning 2% 5% 1985 Strategy gies Competitive generic strate- Continental Lite 8 Delta Air Lines Continental Airlines Continental Lite JC J.C.Penney 17 NC- 17 Sears straddling trade-offs 9 Neutrogena Corporation PH Ivory Soap 10 Continental Lite CEO Continental Lite 1,000 Lite Continental 11 Corolla Corolla 10 Honda Motor Company Toyota Motor Corporation 737 10 1995 Civic fit 12 13 optimization of effort Bic Corporation product availability Gap simple consistency Gap Gap 3 Gap 3 7.5 ...

Words: 347 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Ten Easy Steps to a Successful 401 (K)

...Ten Easy Steps to a Successful 401(k) For the majority of working Americans, the most common vehicle for owning mutual funds is through their employer's retirement plan, but very few people are making the most of this mainstay of retirement planning. Over the holidays, I had occasion to socialize with a group of very bright, successful people who are saving for retirement. We talked of many things, including their investments. And, sad to say, not one of them could coherently explain what he or she was doing, and why. Everybody, it seems, wants a quick, easy answer. And for those who are unwilling to take the trouble to figure out what they should be doing, the easy answers usually come from slick sales pitches and superficial media hype about the hottest stocks, funds and managers -- as if successful investing were a popularity contest. That's the bad news. The good news is that investors can manage their 401(k) plans to make their retirement money work much harder for them. Lots of people spend at least a dozen hours planning a vacation. I often wonder why so few are willing to spend a dozen hours managing their retirement assets. The following ten steps to 401(k) success shouldn't take more than a dozen hours. If you're young, they could put an extra $2 million into your retirement fund. Even if this job requires a total of 100 hours, that's a payoff of $20,000 an hour -- for work you can do at home in your spare time. Let's start with the most basic guideline of...

Words: 1282 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Thine Own Self

...“This Above All: To Thine Own Self Be True” Chapel Address by John C. Bogle Founder and former Chairman, The Vanguard Group Episcopal Academy, Overbrook, PA December 2, 2004 Thank you, Christopher Bogle Webb St. John, my wonderful grandson, for that lovely introduction. And thank you, Nicole Spagnola, long-time friend of my superb granddaughter Ashley St. John, for inviting me to join you and your upper school classmates today. While I’m proud of my reputation, I confess to you all—this may surprise you—that I’m a bit intimidated to stand here before you today. While many of your parents may know a bit about me and Vanguard, you are probably wondering just what this ancient soul can possibly say that would even vaguely interest you. Why would I think that? Because I was actually your age once, trying to find my way in life, in school, and with my family and friends. My hesitancy is illustrated by this story that I heard last year in a sermon by a Scottish preacher: A father is rapping on his son’s door, trying to wake him up to go to school. Through the closed door, the son shouts: “I’m not going to get up, and I’ll give you three reasons why. “One, I hate school. “Two, the children tease me. “Three, because education is boring.” The father shouts right back: “You must get up, and I’ll give you three reasons why. “One, it’s your duty. “Two, because you’re 45 years old. “And three, because you’re the headmaster.” Well, despite my concern about “relating” to you young people...

Words: 2570 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Behavior Paradigms

...Rationalist vs. Behavioralist Paradigm Problems 1. During the last five years, your instructor has discussed the emerging field of behavioral finance with many colleagues. The most common reaction has been for those colleagues to smile and say, "Behavioral finance? That's an oxymoron." Oxymoron is defined as a combination of contradictory or incongruous words (e.g. cruel kindness). Explain this reaction using a) the concept of paradigm and b) attributes of the behavioral and rational paradigms. a) According to the concept of a paradigm, someone in finance would operate on a set of principles that their work is based upon. It is the method by which they analyze their data. Under this philosophy the statement is considered an oxymoron because under the colleagues point of view they view those that study finance one that does not act on behavior. They assume that anything that involves finance automatically dictates numbers and thinking ogically in steps. It is not until there is a shift in the paradigm and that they see it from a finance position do they see the possibility of a behavioral implications. b) According to the rational paradigm, one that is interested in finance is well educated, has some predisposition towards the acclimation of wealth and is focused on the market. By the definition this means that they are rational and not behavioral. 2. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions triggered diverse reactions. Most “hard” scientists shrugged...

Words: 1799 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Essay

...management are the two classes in which the investment strategies are categorized. Active management is whereby financial professionals try to outperform a specific benchmark. Passive funds like the exchange traded funds (ETFs) are whereby the index is tracked with no active stock selection (Barr, 2009). The risk of a failing a benchmark or index can be reduced through passive investment. Passive investment also reduces the cost. The active investment has the potential of boosting returns through outperforming some benchmarks. However, there are increased risks and also there are no guarantees that the benchmarks will be exceeded or matched. In a well-diversified portfolio, active and passive investment can flourish. The role of ETFs which is an important building block for dynamic and diverse portfolios is to offer access to equities and fixed income across large developed economies and the emerging markets. ETFs can be traded like share, thus similar liquidity is offered hence it allows the investor to adjust to their portfolios. In the context of investors’ specific objective, active management allows risks to be managed properly (Barr, 2009). Passive funds don’t neutralize risks, but they introduce benchmark risks and concentrated risks to investors and in relation to exchange-traded fund. The concept of market efficiency holds that there can be no over-valued or under-valued securities because of the market factors of discount which at all times influence the pricing of...

Words: 354 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Passive

...management are the two classes in which the investment strategies are categorized. Active management is whereby financial professionals try to outperform a specific benchmark. Passive funds like the exchange traded funds (ETFs) are whereby the index is tracked with no active stock selection (Barr, 2009). The risk of a failing a benchmark or index can be reduced through passive investment. Passive investment also reduces the cost. The active investment has the potential of boosting returns through outperforming some benchmarks. However, there are increased risks and also there are no guarantees that the benchmarks will be exceeded or matched. In a well-diversified portfolio, active and passive investment can flourish. The role of ETFs which is an important building block for dynamic and diverse portfolios is to offer access to equities and fixed income across large developed economies and the emerging markets. ETFs can be traded like share, thus similar liquidity is offered hence it allows the investor to adjust to their portfolios. In the context of investors’ specific objective, active management allows risks to be managed properly (Barr, 2009). Passive funds don’t neutralize risks, but they introduce benchmark risks and concentrated risks to investors and in relation to exchange-traded fund. The concept of market efficiency holds that there can be no over-valued or under-valued securities because of the market factors of discount which at all times influence the pricing of...

Words: 354 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Performance Evaluation of Finnish Mutual Funds

...Performance Evaluation of Finnish Mutual Funds 2014 TABLE OF CONTENT 1! ABSTRACT ............................................................................................... 1! 2! INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 2! 2.1.! Purpose ................................................................................................................. 2! 3! THE FINNISH FUND MARKET .............................................................. 3! 4! PREVIOUS RESEARCH ........................................................................... 5! 5! METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................... 8! 5.1.! Standard Deviation .............................................................................................. 8! 5.2.! Beta ....................................................................................................................... 8! 5.3.! Jensen Alpha ........................................................................................................ 9! 5.4.! Sharpe Ratio ....................................................................................................... 10! 5.5.! Treynor Ratio ..................................................................................................... 10! 5.6.! Hypothesis ........................................................................................................... 11! ...

Words: 6346 - Pages: 26