Premium Essay

Innocent Killed Cases

Submitted By
Words 919
Pages 4
MAJOR CASES OF TERORIST INCIDENTS/BOMB BLAST IN THE HINTERLAND FROM 1989-2015
Date Incident SFs/Civilian causalities Case Particulars Judgment on Killed Injured
27.08.1989 Innocent Killed: 10 undefined KLF (Budhinghwala0terrorist indulged in indiscriminate firing in a passenger train at Kabarwala (Faridkot). AK 47 Rifles, stenguns, pistols etc. were used in the massacre. 17 16
10.01.1990 Bomb Explosion: 3 Security personnel including Commandant, 75 Bn.PAP along with 01 sub-inspector and 01 constable were killed while 30 others injured through explosion of a bomb caused by KFC outfit, planted in the water cooler and operated through a time device in PAP Complex, Jalandhar, Punjab. 03 30
07.03.1990 Innocents Killed: KFC extremists
…show more content…
Ferozpur on the night intervening March 18/19 by using AK 47 rifles. 11 ---
15.04.1990 Bomb Explosion:
There was an explosion in a Delhi bound bus at Panipat bus stand, which resulted in killing of 11 passengers and injuries to 39 others. BKI outfit was involved in the incident. 11 39
19.04.1990 Bomb Explosion: There was a powerful bomb blast caused by Sikh extremists in the Jammu bound bus from Moga via Pathankot. Near village Bahroli Kalan, Teshsil Pathankot Dist. Gurdaspur, resulting in the killing of 16 persons and injuries to 33. 16 33
27.05.1990 Innocent
…show more content…
Chandigarh in his office in Sector 26. 01 ----
06.12.1990 Innocent Killing: Two scooter borne BKI extremists shot dead AK Talib, Station Director AIR, Chandigarh at his residence in Sector 9, Chandigarh which resulted in the temporary stoppage of Hindi News bulletins and other Hindi programmes from AIR Chandigarh. 01 ----
15.01.1991 Attack on Railway Passengers/Attack on Trains: In two major terrorist attacks on trains in District of Ludhiana 74 passengers were killed and 46 others injured. The first incident took place about 2 kms towards Ludhiana from Baddowal Railway Station. At about 2120 hours, 3 Sikh extremists boarded the engine of the train and forced the driver to drive the train smoothly. After some time, some associates of these Sikh extremists opened fire on passengers in 4 compartments.
In the 2nd incident which took place at Railway Station Qila Raipur at around 2210 hours, about 10-12 Sikh extremists with muffled faces came to Railway Station entered in Ludhiana bound 5- Jakhal-Ludhiana passenger train and fired/killed the passengers in the compartment of the train. 74

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Death Penalty

...extremists from both sides start yelling out their arguments. One side says deterrence, the other side says there's a potential of executing an innocent person; one says justice, retribution, and punishment; the other side says execution is murder. Regardless of people’s philosophic points of view, it is important to be aware of the facts. This is exactly what I would like to talk about in this essay: the facts regarding this controversial issue. I do not have the answer to this question; I believe both viewpoints have good arguments. Everyone is entitled to his or her own opinion in this or any other matter, but no one is entitled to his own facts. What is the death penalty? Congress or any state legislature may prescribe the death penalty, also known as capital punishment, for murder and other capital crimes. (Death Penalty: An Overview, 2010) As far back as the Ancient Laws of China, the death penalty has been established as a punishment for crimes. In the 18th Century BC, the Code of King Hammurabi of Babylon established the death penalty for twenty five different crimes, although murder was not one of them. The first death sentence historically recorded occurred in 16th Century BC Egypt where the wrongdoer, a member of nobility, was accused of magic, and ordered to take his own life. During this period non-nobility was usually killed with an ax. (Reggio, M. 2005) The first recorded execution in the English American colonies was in 1608 when officials executed George......

Words: 2381 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Capital Punishment

...lethal fury by insisting that the benefits that these executions would bring to the rest of societies safety. People would argue that a person accused of taking another person’s life should suffer the same pain that they caused not only the deceased but also their family. I would say that it would be reasonable for a person to feel that way but not only does the deceased’s individual’s family have to suffer for the loss but, the accused’s family members must watch their loved one be executed. Just because we sentence someone to death it does not mean that it will bring back the deceased individual. By killing the accused it sends a message of “you killed one of us, so we are now going to kill you” while I was growing up I was always told that two wrongs don’t make a right. By the state using a punishment of death for someone who killed another it sends the wrong message. The financial cost of executing an individual is far greater than it would be to...

Words: 1497 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Death Penalty

...issues in the criminal justice system. Hundreds of criminals are being killed legally at the hands of the government every day. Why you may ask, because they were convicted of killing one or more people. But the government can do it and get away with it. The death penalty is wrong and should be outlawed in all 50 states. The reasons why it should be outlawed are: the person could be innocent, it is not a good crime deterrent, and it does not cause closure for a victim’s families. The most obvious reason it should be banned is that it is against the law. It says so in our constitution. The Eighth Amendment clearly states that the federal government is prohibited from using cruel and unusual punishment. Most people would have to say that sitting down in a chair and getting electrocuted until your dead or getting poison shoved in your veins is pretty cruel and unusual. Also when you put someone to death for committing murder you are committing an act of it as well, which is an eye for an eye. Evidently the government seems to not think so. Another good reason to ban capital punishment is the person who was charged with the murder could actually be innocent and wrongfully accused. This means that an innocent person was put to death when instead they could have been in prison and found innocent later down the line. This makes a huge mess because it makes ordinary people afraid that they could be charged and killed for something they didn’t do. It also makes the prosecutors......

Words: 1112 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Morality of Warfare: Case Study Drone

...20 July 2014 The Morality of Warfare: Case Study; Drone Warfare Advancements in warfare technology and weaponry have been the defining factors in battle since the dawn of civilization. The one with the bigger gun usually wins. This is a fact that hasn’t changed much since the beginnings of warfare and holds true today and in today’s world Drones have become the next warfare advantage. Along with any advancement in warfare weaponry comes a very heated and controversial discussion about its actual real-world utilization. Many argue that the use of Drones in war is unmoral and unethical. This paper aims to take a closer look at both sides of this argument. First, I will establish and explain the moral arguments against the use of drone warfare, then the second half of the article will be in response to such claims and give the moral reasons behind the pro-drone argument. First and foremost of the anti-drone discussion is the fact that Drones are seen to be fundamentally in contradiction of international law: 
 Amnesty International stated that that “deliberate killings by drones […] very likely violate the prohibition of arbitrary deprivation of life and may constitute extrajudicial executions.” The UN suggested focused effort to maintain and preserve the security of international laws in its entirety, in response to the use of drones. This incorporates, obviously, international human rights and humanitarian standards that seem to be thrown out the window when dealing......

Words: 3714 - Pages: 15

Premium Essay

The Drone Strikes Again

...The Drone Strikes Again Take a moment and imagine this: for every terrorist killed by a U.S. drone strike, 50 Pakistani civilians fall victims to these ruthless attacks. According to an article written by David Kilcullen and Andrew McDonald from the NY Times, “press reports suggest that over the last three years drone strikes have killed about 14 terrorist leaders. But, according to Pakistani sources, they have also killed some 700 civilians. This is 50 civilians for every militant killed, a hit rate of 2 percent — hardly “precision”” (Killcullen, McDonald 9). Regardless if the number of casualties of innocent people caused by drone strikes has increased or decreased, the policy itself should be eliminated if there is even the slightest chance that innocent lives will be at stake. Kant was not a consequentialist theorist; in other words, he believed that despite the outcome of an action being good or bad, what was important was the premeditated idea behind the action, was it right or wrong, unrelated to the consequences. Therefore, if actions are not based on consequences, Kant’s theory would support the argument that using drone tactics to eliminate terrorists is morally unacceptable, for the following reasons: the U.S. military is using drone tactics against terrorist without their consent, and innocent lives are being taken at the push of a button. As humans, our moral duty is to treat people in such a way that shows them respect, as though they are autonomous beings......

Words: 967 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Essay

...Since the beginning of time, people have been committing murders and vicious acts against one another. In the earlier times, the acts that were committed; were counter reacted with the same crime done to that person. For instance, if one killed someone they in return would be killed. The death penalty today is used for only severe crimes against humanity. An example of a severe crime against humanity is the Oklahoma City bombings. The death penalty is viewed as strange and unknown land that people would like to explore. “Thanks to the decision of a California district judge last week, the American public has been spared the spectacle of criminals being executed on television”, said Jacob Weisberg in the article This is Your death( Weisberg 9). As regards to the death penalty today it is viewed as cruel punishment, why is the United States the only democracy to have it, kills innocent, and cheapens the value of human life. In my opinion the death penalty is exactly what you make of it. If someone kills someone in my opinion them, themselves should have the same fate. The death penalty is viewed by millions of people as cruel and unusual punishment. As stated by Edward I. Koch in Death and Justice, the death penalty is “barbaric” (Koch 905). Capital punishment is the intentional taking of one’s life because they have committed a heinous crime against society. The death penalty today is not viewed as “barbaric” because of the way that capital punishment is carried out. ......

Words: 1282 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

English Literature

...we should let violent criminals on the streets but means that we needn't sink to there level and kill them just like they killed the victims. Argument three: Violence begets more violence One of the best arguments for the death penalty is that if we really want to promote a nonviolent society our legal system needs to set the example. If we want people to be less violent than we need our judicial system to be nonviolent. If we as a society are saying killing people is an acceptable method of dealing with a problem than other people will interpret that as a green light to use killing to fix their problems. The only real way to stop violence is to promote the sanctity of life and send a clear message to society that killing isn't okay under any circumstances and it's impossible to do that while the state itself is killing people. Argument four: The death penalty carries with it the risk of executing innocent men Over the years several people have been killed by the state for crimes they did not commit. Every few years in another case is discovered where a man was executed for a crime of which they are later found innocent. This is one of the better arguments against the death penalty because it appeals to peoples sense of natural justice. It seems that we should prioritize the rights of the innocent ahead of the need to execute criminals. While an innocent person can be released...

Words: 785 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Doc, Docx, Pdf, Wps, Rtf, Odt

...Arguments for and Against the Death Penalty from http://deathpenaltyinfo.msu.edu/ ARGUMENT 1 DETERRENCE The death penalty prevents future murders. Society has always used punishment to discourage would-be criminals from unlawful action. Since society has the highest interest in preventing murder, it should use the strongest punishment available to deter murder, and that is the death penalty. If murderers are sentenced to death and executed, potential murderers will think twice before killing for fear of losing their own life. For years, criminologists analyzed murder rates to see if they fluctuated with the likelihood of convicted murderers being executed, but the results were inconclusive. Then in 1973 Isaac Ehrlich employed a new kind of analysis which produced results showing that for every inmate who was executed, 7 lives were spared because others were deterred from committing murder. Similar results have been produced by disciples of Ehrlich in follow-up studies. Moreover, even if some studies regarding deterrence are inconclusive, that is only because the death penalty is rarely used and takes years before an execution is actually carried out. Punishments which are swift and sure are the best deterrent. The fact that some states or countries which do not use the death penalty have lower murder rates than jurisdictions which do is not evidence of the failure of deterrence. States with high murder rates would have even higher rates if they did not use the death penalty....

Words: 6130 - Pages: 25

Premium Essay

Sjsj

...Arguments for and Against the Death Penalty from http://deathpenaltyinfo.msu.edu/ ARGUMENT 1 DETERRENCE The death penalty prevents future murders. Society has always used punishment to discourage would-be criminals from unlawful action. Since society has the highest interest in preventing murder, it should use the strongest punishment available to deter murder, and that is the death penalty. If murderers are sentenced to death and executed, potential murderers will think twice before killing for fear of losing their own life. For years, criminologists analyzed murder rates to see if they fluctuated with the likelihood of convicted murderers being executed, but the results were inconclusive. Then in 1973 Isaac Ehrlich employed a new kind of analysis which produced results showing that for every inmate who was executed, 7 lives were spared because others were deterred from committing murder. Similar results have been produced by disciples of Ehrlich in follow-up studies. Moreover, even if some studies regarding deterrence are inconclusive, that is only because the death penalty is rarely used and takes years before an execution is actually carried out. Punishments which are swift and sure are the best deterrent. The fact that some states or countries which do not use the death penalty have lower murder rates than jurisdictions which do is not evidence of the failure of deterrence. States with high murder rates would have even higher rates if they did not......

Words: 6130 - Pages: 25

Premium Essay

A Case for the Death Penalty

...A Case for the Death Penalty The death penalty was employed for centuries but within the past 50 years it has come under attack by the ACLU and other right to life organizations. Although it can be a difficult way to die, a person on death row doesn’t arrive there without extreme evidence or circumstances, including prior convictions and a trial by a jury of their peers. The purpose of this paper is to rebut the Article “The case against the Death Penalty” written by Hugo Bedau. Hugo Bedau is a Philosophy Professor at Tufts University and author of two books on the subject of the death penalty. With his ties to many Anti-Death Penalty groups his views on the subject would be skewed. In Bedau’s (1992) article he writes, “If, however, severe punishment can deter crime, then long term imprisonment is severe enough to cause any rational person not to commit violent crimes.” This argument is absurd because how can people who commit homicides be thought of as rational after murdering innocent people instead of fist fighting, talking over the situation, or other nonlethal tack. There are no studies that state how many murders the death penalty prevents by having it available to the prosecution, however; as seen in the graph below, murders committed and the amount of those executed are inversely affected. A case in point would be found in December 1991 when Collen Reed was kidnapped, raped, tortured, and killed by Kenneth McDuff. Sentenced to death in 1966, he......

Words: 583 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Central Park 5

...Central Park Five Discrimination and stereotypes have been a problem in the United States for a while now. There are many stereotypes for different races and there have been many cases of discrimination throughout history. In the United States, most discrimination cases are against the colored community, this includes the African American and the Hispanics. It is really easy for the police to believe that colored people are the ones responsible for many of the crimes that happen in the United States. In 1989, five young boys, Korey Wise, Antron McCray, Kevin Richardson, Raymond Santana, and Yusef Salaam, were falsely accused of raping a twenty-eight year old white jogger in Central Park, New York and served up to thirteen years in prison without people questioning their innocence because they had colored skin. In April of 1989, a white female went for a jog at Central Park. She was raped multiple times and was beaten up at 10:30 pm. Her rapist left her in very critical conditions. She was found at 1:30 am by two other joggers. The joggers found the victim unconscious and almost nude. Five young colored boys were accused of raping the woman. On April 21, 1989, the Daily News newspaper in New York printed an article called “Wolf Pack’s Prey”. The article gave details about the case. The news paper used quotes that police officers would say when they would talk about what they heard in the confessions. For Example, the Daily News says, “ One youth admitted to rape and......

Words: 982 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Death Sentence

...the community, or the whole state for that matter, to handle their problems? Another reason that I feel so strongly against the death penalty has to do with the judicial process that has to be gone through just too even began the execution process. There has to be so much extensive research done to make sure those innocent men and women do not get executed for a crime that did not even commit. Even with going through all these precautions, the risk of executing an innocent person is still there. While this process is happening the guilty party just has to sit and hesitantly wait to have their destiny pronounced. Imagine how the innocent people feel after they wait and then find out that are declared guilty, they were not only accused of something they did not do but then they almost got killed because of it. The mixed emotions coming from those people have to be so intense, being raged with anger then being so happy to have their life back. They had to sit there, knowing they did nothing to be there in the first place and wait until a decision is made. There are so many cases involving people who have been released from death row because they were proven innocent. How does that make our law enforcement look? They...

Words: 1026 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

For the Death Penalty

...DEATH PENALTY ARGUMENTS: Deterrent or Revenge (Pros and Cons) INTRODUCTION What is Capital punishment? Capital punishment is the death penalty. It is used today and was used in ancient times to punish a variety of offenses. Even the bible advocates death for murder and other crimes like kidnapping and witchcraft. When the word death penalty is used, it makes yelling and screaming from both sides of extremist. One side may say deterrence, while the other side may say, but you may execute an innocent man. Today, one of the most debated issues in the Criminal Justice System is the issue of capital punishment or the death penalty. Capital punishment was legal until 1972, when the Supreme Court declared it unconstitutional in Furman v. Georgia stating that it violated the Eight and Fourteen Amendments citing cruel and unusual punishment. However, in 1976, the Supreme Court reversed itself with Gregg v. Georgia and reinstated the death penalty but not all states have the death penalty. Thirteen states do not have the death penalty: Alaska, District of Colombia, Hawaii, Iowa, Main, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. AGAINST THE DEATH PENALTY (CONS) Death Penalty Fails to Rehabilitate What would it accomplish to put someone on death row? The victim is already dead-you cannot bring him back. When the......

Words: 4215 - Pages: 17

Free Essay

Predator Drone Critique

...attacks of September 11, 2001. Terrorism is unique in that the majority of the acts perpetrated have no direct connection to foreign governments. Rather, terrorism emanates from extremist cells within the populace, with a network of individuals and properties living everyday life alongside the general population. The problem is further complicated because the enemy is hardly ever together as one, instead spread across different countries, and indeed continents. In present day War on Terror, it is necessary to eliminate small cells of extremists living among the general populace, often in a covert manner. Small, low-profile yet highly accurate and effective strikes that do not involve US military personnel are essential to avoid harming innocent civilians. One of the most famous weapons to be developed from these emerging necessities in the 1980’s and 1990’s is the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV), more commonly known as the Predator Drone. The politics, geography, and targets of the War on Terror make the Predator Drone an ideal weapon for use in Afghanistan and Pakistan, two of the most important areas of anti-American terrorist activity. Working alongside the CIA’s network of intelligence gathering, the past five years have seen increasing utilization of the Predator Drone for both...

Words: 3985 - Pages: 16

Premium Essay

Pan's Labyrinth Innocence Quotes

...She is wearing a green dress and no longer wearing a bow. The loss of the white dress and bow visually symbolizes how she is no longer innocent. While in the room with the Pale Man, she witnesses the death of two fairies and is chased and almost killed by the Pale Man as well. Before she entered this room, she was explicitly told not to eat any of the food on the table. Instead of being smart and listening to the rules, she picks up a grape and eats it, putting her in a dangerous situation. Her eating the food is a reminder that she is still a child, which is easy to forget when she is partaking in these dangerous situations. All of the food on the table is red, foreshadowing the danger that it possesses. Red also means anger which represents the anger the Pale Man feels once she eats the fruit. By being in this dangerous situation, she’s forced to do courageous, grown up things, leaving all of her innocence behind. She witnesses the death of the fairies that were trying to help her and then is nearly killed herself by the Pale...

Words: 897 - Pages: 4