Free Essay

Insanity Defense Paper

In: Other Topics

Submitted By keshiagross
Words 1090
Pages 5
Insanity Defense Paper
Team B
CJS/305
June 1, 2015
David Harper

Insanity Defense Paper
Mr. Stu Dents is charged with the murder of his girlfriend and a legal team has been chosen to represent him. At the time of his arrest, Mr. Dents was witnessed by police yelling such things as “Alien” and “I am God, let me go! I am God!” Now facing not only homicide but several other criminal charges such as burglary, assault on police, and kidnapping, Mr. Dents has made the choice to plead insanity. However, the question remains as to whether or not there is enough for an insanity defense. Should Mr. Dents stand trial? What are the state requirements for an insanity defense? What steps must be taken to prove insanity?
Trial
Mr. Dents’ defense team needs to decide if he should stand trial or not. Based on his arrest information a reasonable person would believe Mr. Dents to suffer from some sort of mental illness. However, when deciding if a defendant should stand trial or not the decision is not based on their mindset during the crime or the arrest. The decision is based on the mental state of the defendant at the start of trial. According to Criminal Law Today, “a person is competent to stand trial if he or she, at the time of trial, has sufficient present ability to consult with his or her lawyer with a reasonable degree of understanding and a rational as well as factual understanding of the proceedings” (Schmalleger, Hall, & Dolatowski, 2014). Mr. Dents has already consulted with his defense team and had the mental ability to request an insanity defense. His request for the insanity defense shows that he understands the charges that he is facing as well as the proceedings. It is the opinion of the defense team that he is competent to stand trial and should do so.

Insanity Defense
However, evidence showed that Mr. Dents does have signs of mental issues, because, not only did he assault one of the arresting officers, he also was extremely agitated and witnessed yelling “Aliens”, and that he was God. In addition, prior to the murder, Mr. Dents’ personal journal writings and multiple pictures of the victim portray mental instability. The defense attorney would like to bring psychologist specialties for examination evidence and to further evaluate the defendant to ensure that the decision on pleading insanity would stand.
In many different states the requirements of insanity are different. For example, in the states of Florida and Alabama they use the M’Naghten Rule. This rule is sued in “twenty-eight states and recognized by the federal government” (p. 262). The M’Naghten test consists of the suffering of a mental disease in addition to the defendant not knowing the nature and quality of the act as well as the defendant did not know he was doing anything wrong in committing the act. The defendant would have to have mental infirmity, disease, or defect and because of that condition did not have knowledge of what he or she was doing and didn’t know that it was wrong, all while committing the crime. The psychologist specialties, along with any other medical records, could further affirm the defendant’s mental stability, and to see if he would be able to stand trial or not. However, in Alabama mental treatment facilities and programs are limited due to budget cuts in healthcare. Furthermore, many other states, such as Ohio, use the Model Penal Code rule in which allows the admission of evidence that the defendant must provide revealing that they suffer from a mental disease whenever relevant to prove they did or did not have a state of mind that is an element to the offense committed. In every state, the burden of proof is on the defendant to which the defendant is assumed to be sane until otherwise proven. "Thirteen states have adopted the guilty but mentally ill verdict for defendants" (p. 268) Other states, such as Idaho, Montana, Kansas and Utah no longer accept a plea of insanity but allows evidence to show mental illnesses that would result in lack of criminal intent.
Proving Insanity The insanity defense is available for three major reasons. Those reasons are free will, theories of punishment and humanitarianism. Free will cites that the decision to disobey the law resulted from a disability. Theories of punishment are associated with the inability to deter those from committing crimes who cannot distinguish right from wrong in addition to the cruelty of punishment that resulted from a disability. Lastly, humanitarianism shows the need for those who are mentally disabled to be incapacitated in a noncriminal, treatment environment. There are certain steps that need to be attained in order to prove insanity. The insanity plea requires notice of such a defense and subjects the defendant to examinations and psychological testing by health experts. States that observe not guilty by reason of insanity require the defendant to be committed to a mental institution. A civil commitment hearing would also assist in assessment of the defendant’s threat and recognize if a sentence to an institution is necessary. The confirmation tests used in an insanity defense case are the M’Naghten, Irresistible Impulse, Durham Product Test and the American Law Institutes Model Penal Code Standard. “The fundamental difference among these tests is whether the emphasis s place on a defendant’s ability to know right from wrong or whether the stress is placed on a defendant’s ability to control their behavior” (p. 262). These tests focus on various attributes of mental illness and definitions of those mental illnesses contributory to offense committed would be used throughout proceedings in order to provide testimony to guide the jury and assist in providing evidence in relation to the insanity plea.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the defense team for Mr. Stu Dents is certain that a defense of insanity will work for their client. Proving insanity in court is not an easy task as this paper has already shown. However, the team believes that they have enough information to prove his insanity to the jury and are now ready to proceed with trial. Being that he is going to trial, he will not stand a chance not being guilty. He was in good condition when he committed the murder, which means he knew what he was doing. Right is right and wrong is wrong is wrong.

References
Schmalleger, F., Hall, D. E., & Dolatowski, J. J. (2014). Criminal Law Today (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Insanity Defense Research Paper

...Insanity defense is a legal provision Insanity defense, which is also referred to as the mental disorder defense, is a defensive mechanism that is based on excuse in criminal trials. In the insanity defense, the defendant is alleged not to be responsible for the criminal actions because they have a persistent psychiatric illness or episodic. The insanity defense is one of the oldest fixtures of the Anglo-American legal tradition (Ewing, 2008 p. 188). Most of the cases that relate to the insanity defense are normally highly controversial, contested and time consuming. Consequently, in insanity defense, the defense is based on the information given by the accused in a criminal prosecution; the action is made this way to avoid defensive liability...

Words: 394 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Plea Insanity

...The “Insanity” Plea The “Insanity” Plea A criminal defendant who is found to have been legally insane in the course of committing a crime is relieved the criminal responsibility by the virtue of suffering from a mental disease (Findlaw, 2015). In some cases, the accused may be sentenced to a less severe sentence or punishment after being found on the wrong side of the law because of the mental impairment. Many nations allow the insanity defense in their legal systems. However, the accused must prove to the court that they were not on their senses or acted upon uncontrolled impulse or some variety of these factors when doing the wrongful doings. The general sense of insanity plea is to provide the alleged perpetrator of the criminal offense a fair trial. The society is even in agreement with this principle in extreme cases. Nonetheless, the major challenge falls on where to draw the line. That is, the circumstances where one can be considered insane and instances when he or she is not. It is worth noting that, no matter how appealing the crime itself is, it doesn’t demonstrate the level of insanity. Today, the legal systems use way too much of the insanity defenses. While there are many questionable defense tactics, insanity plea targets to protect the rights of the accused and further the course of justice. This paper discusses the insanity plea as used in the legal systems in the present times. What is the main purpose of insanity plea? How did it find...

Words: 1941 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Criminal Defense Case Analysis

...Criminal Defense Case Analysis Melissa Bowman CJA/305 January 30, 2016 Jerri Green Introduction This paper will go over two cases that explain the nature and types of defense used and the evidence used to demonstrate the defense. The first case explained will discuss Andrea Yates, a mom who killed her five children on grounds of insanity. The next case Jean Harris also claimed to be insane and by accident killed someone by accident as she tried to commit suicide. It will also address how justification and excuse play a role in the cases. Lastly, the outcomes of each case will be given. Explain the nature and types of defenses used in the cases and what evidence was used to demonstrate the defense. There are multiple types of defense, justification and excuse are affirmative defenses. This is when it must be raised or asserted by the defendant independently of any claims made by the prosecutor. The first case to be explained is about Andrea Yates, the type of defense she chooses was innocence by reason of insanity Andrea Yates Biography. (2016). She had cited postpartum psychosis. Yates was treated for postpartum depression and psychosis; they showed that the illness ran in her family. The birth of her fifth child and death of her father was shown as a reason she fell into a severe depression. She had been admitted to Devereux-Texas Treatment Network and was put on psychotropic drug treatments Andrea Yates Biography. (2016). She was accused of drowning all five...

Words: 783 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

The Insanity Defense

...Introduction In this paper, you will read about the different insanity statutes being used in our country and a little about how they became our insanity statutes. I am going to discuss which insanity statute is being used in the state I live in and how often it is used. Since we will know how often this defense is used, you will also learn how successful it is. I will discuss the major criticisms and whether the psychologist should provide an ultimate opinion in sanity cases. Lastly, we will learn about some of the difficulties in providing appropriate psychological treatment for the mentally ill who are not seen as insane and are subsequently convicted of their charges, while incarcerated. The Insanity Defense During a pretrial a defendant may opt to plea “not guilty by reason of insanity” (NGRI). The insanity statutes are; The M’Naughten Rule, Model Penal Code (which is now known as the Brawner Rule). “The M’Naughten rule was developed to determine whether or not an individual accused of a crime was mentally ill at the time the crime was committed, and if they would be held criminally responsible for their “wrongdoing” (M’Naughten Rule, n.d.). The Brawner Rule “states that a defendant is not responsible for criminal conduct if he, ‘at the time of such conduct as a result of mental disease or defect, [lacks] substantial capacity either to appreciate the criminality [wrongfulness] of his conduct or to conform his conduct to the requirements of the law’” (Greene, 2010 p 210)...

Words: 1206 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Ethical Issues with the Insanity Defense

...with the Insanity Defense Shorter University Abstract There are many cases that exist currently and historically regarding the “Insanity Defense.” In some cases, those convicted for murderous crimes, was said to be guilty by reason of insanity (NGRI). In other words, the person that committed the crime, was not made aware of his or her actions at the time when the crime was committed or the perpetrator was not in his or her right mind; therefore, causing him or her to have some form of mental illness. However, the question becomes are there ethical issues within the use of this plea? The criminal justice system is supposed to protect the lives of others. In many cases, it only becomes a question of ethics if there is a misuse of the insanity defense. This defense can sometimes cause one to question this defense because victims of the perpetrator are left to resolve the death of their loved ones based on guilty by reason of insanity. In some situations, criminals are not competent to stand trial for their crime, which for families of the victims, closure seems to be never ending, especially if there is not a death or life sentence involved. However, criminals that commit crimes without knowledge of the act should be entitled to receive proper help and receive a fair trial. Therefore, this paper will focus on the history of the insanity defense and how the insanity defense came into play. A synopsis of some familiar cases involving the use of the insanity defense will be discussed...

Words: 2064 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

The Crazy Crook: a Study of Criminality and Insanity

...reactions towards the insane criminal. People base their judgement of the criminal and the insane on their representations in the media, which are usually based on stereotypes. Whether insanity is a prerequisite quality for being a criminal or criminality is a manifestation of insanity, there is a definite link between the two, that has been strengthened by the media’s portrayal of the insane criminal. Michel Foucault discusses people’s tendencies to classify people as “normal” or “abnormal” (Faubion 1994). “Abnormal” refers to anyone who deviates from the norm and as a result, we treat the criminal and the insane in a similar manner: We remove them from society in order to give ourselves peace of mind, yet this treatment is not a new phenomenon. For centuries, society has attempted to marginalise both the criminal and the insane. In Madness and Civilization: a History of Insanity in the Age of Reason (1965) Foucault describes this classification as a means to exclude certain types of people from society, by placing them in prisons or institutions. They are taken out of the social order and locked away, to present a “safer” world for those who consider themselves “normal”. We classify the criminal and the insane as “abnormal” without truly understanding the underlying issues of criminality and insanity. This begs the question of what the criminal and the insane actually have in common? Foucault states that criminals are defined in terms of three different discourses: medical...

Words: 1725 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Gravity: an Analysis of Madness in Wieland

...Jared Cruz Professor Estrada American Lit. 1 April 18th, 2015 Word Count: 1,799 Gravity: An Analysis of Insanity in Wieland To some, the definition of madness is a state in which one is mentally unstable and filled with irrationality. To others like famous scientist Albert Einstein, true insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting different results every time. Regardless of how it is defined, one fact about insanity or madness remains true to this day and can be summed up by one quote from perhaps the most famous insane character of all time, the Joker: “Madness, as you know, is like gravity... All it takes is a little push!” This very idea of insanity and how susceptible to madness the mind can be is a central theme throughout Charles Brockden Brown's Wieland. In the novel, one of the primary forces behind everyone's growing paranoia and dementia are a series of voices that literally cause the protagonist's brother, Theodore Wieland, to murder his wife and children. Of course the voices not only affect Theodore, but rather the entire community as a whole, namely the protagonist herself. Clara Wieland is just as easily prone to the insanity that overcomes her circle of friends and family. Many times throughout the novel, Clara demonstrates various qualities of irrationality, such as contemplating suicide and struggling to maintain grasp onto reality. While these are prime examples of madness within the novel, one's sanity that often goes unchecked is that...

Words: 1907 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Summary Of The Insanity Defense: The Case Of Andrea Yates

...This paper will address the validity of the insanity defense as it relates to the case of Andrea Yates. I believe that the court was incorrect in the verdict of Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity. I believe this because she and her family could have taken many precautions in preventing the tragic deaths of her children. Also, after the murders of her children, she called her husband and stated that she “finally did it”; her saying this indicates that she had been planning the murders of her children for some time and had just then decided to act on her plans. Additionally, following her arrest, Andrea told her husband that she wouldn't need a lawyer because she wasn't planning on pleading not guilty. First of all, there were numerous precautions...

Words: 431 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Criminal Procedures

...Criminal Behavior Lorenzo Reid Virginia College Online Abstract The following paper will address the different areas of the Psychological and Psychiatric Foundations of Criminal Behavior. Within this paper, every aspect from theories to what the law states when it comes to this state will be addressed. Criminal Behavior Doctor Leon Eisenberg once stated, "...persons who are seriously mentally ill are far more likely to be the victims of violence than its initiators." (Campbell) Yet how true is that? When it comes to mental illness, there have been several violent crimes that have been committed, and been blamed on mental illness. There are several shows for entertainment such as the show “Criminal Minds”, that attempts to bring a reality and understanding to mental illness and criminal behavior. This show gives a reality to the fact that people can be simply mentally ill and not simply criminals. In early society times, people simply did not take mental illness into account. It was thought that people, regardless of their mental state, should be accountable for their actions. Yet, in today’s society, this is not the case. Due to research and a better developed country, citizens are given an opportunity to show that their mental state was not steady when they committed a crime. So, what is it then, which motivated a person to kill or maim another? How can a person kill someone else, or a numerous amount of people, with no remorse? These questions and several...

Words: 3479 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Criminal Defense Case Analysis

...Criminal Defense Case Analysis Paper Brandy Alston University of Phoenix Criminal Law CJA/343 Professor Joseph Wade March 1, 2012 Criminal Defense Case Analysis Paper Many individuals are aware of the process that lawyer go through to convict an individual. The prosecution has to prove a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty of a crime, the accused does not have to present evidence for the innocent. The Fifth Amendment is the United States constitution states a defendant is not compelled to under oath criminate themselves, however in most cases the defendant want the chance to prove their innocent in court by having a defense. Criminal law is define as a code, rules, or statute that prohibits the conducts this is prohibit in region or state, federal government. However, when laws results in violations where the individual charged with the crime and haul off to jail. Although once the individual charged, they have the right to defend themselves in court with legal representation. This paper aims to examine and identify the different kind of criminal defense used in a criminal trial. This paper will discuss the two common defenses used in our justice system legal I did it but and factual I did not do it, the defense I did not do it means presumption of innocent and the defense I did it but means guilty with reason. Factual defense is the legal defense offers two group defense excuse and justification that has six categories for them. In justification...

Words: 1029 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

The Hidden Criminal

...The Hidden Criminal CRJ308: Psychology of Criminal Behavior (BLG1231A) Instructor: Stephanie Myers September 3, 2012 The Hidden Criminal “I doubt if a single individual could be found from the whole of mankind free from some form of insanity. The only difference is one of degree.” (Desiderius Erasmus) Determining mental disorders among the criminal population is difficult as well as tedious but it is important that they are continue to be researched to better understand the criminal mind and to distinguish those that are plagued by mental disorders from those that choose the life of crime. In this paper I want to address the way the criminal with mental disorders perceive situations compared with what we would consider a normal person and that of a person who commits a crime for personal reasons. The first thing that should be known is that a person with a mental disorder(s) can seem like a completely normal person. In several segments of Hidden in Plain Sight: Looking for Mental Illness we see that picking out a person with a mental disorder is almost as difficult as finding a needle in a haystack even when you know what you are looking for. This research was on a group of ten people that some experienced different disorders while there was nothing wrong with others. Gathering these people to live together for five days while three different Psychiatrists observing. Their goal was to pick out the ones with disorders from those who were considered normal. This...

Words: 2244 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Andrea Yates

...Andrea Yates Cassandra Professor Criminology Spring 2012 Andrea Kennedy was born on July 2, 1964 and married the love of her life, Rusty Yates on April 17, 1993. The plans to have as many children as possible seemed like a fairy tale storybook to the newlyweds but little did Rusty know June 20, 2001 would be the last day he would see his five children that he and Andrea had conceived. Andrea Yates was found guilty on behalf of drowning all five of her children in her Texas home bathtub. June 20, 2001 was the most horrifying day for the Yates’ family and for every other individual notified of one of the most gruesome murders a woman has committed. “She just repeated her statement and then added, “It’s time. I did it” (Ramsland). This statement came from the chilling phone call Rusty Yates had received only an hour after leaving his house. Frantic over what she meant, she simply said it had to do with the children, all of the children. Racing to get home, he knew something traumatic must have happened simply because police and ambulances were already there. He witnessed his wife being led away in handcuffs and gained the knowledge that all five of his children had died. His wife, Andrea had drowned their children. Four children were found lying down with their eyes open in the bedroom with a sheet over them, soaking wet of water. The one remaining was found in the bathtub filled with feces and vomit, appearing to be dead as well. Her five children ranged in age from...

Words: 1504 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Schizophrenia Presentation

...* * * * What is the difference between mental illness and insanity? (Hint: What is the important second prong of the McNaughton rule?) * A person that is insane does not understand the consequences of any of the actions they are committing; in this case we are speaking of the shooting of an officer. A person with mental illness, does have the understanding of their actions, but can suffer from many conditions such as depression of even psychosis. * The McNaughton rule cannot be used to defend the actions of a person who drinks alcohol and then murders someone. Why not? A person that is under the influence of alcohol suffers from neither mental illness nor insanity, they are just intoxicated therefore, they are still held accountable for their actions. * Identify each of the following: a. Rational and guilty * A defendant who is Rational and Guilty had the mental capacity to understand that what he was doing was wrong and was convicted of his crime. b. Guilty but insane * A verdict of Guilty but Insane would find mentally ill defendants criminally liable. They would get psychiatric treatment while incarcerated, or, alternatively, to be placed in a mental hospital. If/when they get well they are then moved to a prison to serve their sentences. c. Not guilty by reason of insanity * A verdict of Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity allows a defendant to avoid prison altogether. The state will mandate psychiatric...

Words: 369 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Discribe the Concept of Due Process

...So. 2, 7 (Fla. 1929). The constitution states only one command twice. The Fifth Amendment says to the federal government that no shall be “deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law”. The Fourteenth Amendment uses the same eleven words called Due Process Clause and it is used to describe the legal obligation of all states. Basically they are giving an promise of assurance that all levels of the government must operate within the law and provide fair procedures. Describe three of the legal defense. The three defenses that I would like to describe would be the insanity defense, self-defense, and the entrapment defense. The insanity defense is the defendant claims that because of mental health problems they were not responsible for their actions. The insanity defense is based on evaluations from professionals that state that the defendant was incapable of distinguishing between right and wrong in the legal sense. The theory behind the defense is people who are insane cannot have the intent required to performs a criminal act because they either do not know the act is wrong or they cannot control their actions even when they understand the act is wrong. The second...

Words: 484 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

King Lear

...Pavith Baskaran Ms. Marsh ENG 4U1 September 26 2011 Sanity in the Face of Relativity In our customary everyday lives, and by having a religious and ethical lifestyle, one is required by humanity to display socially acceptable qualities of sanity. Sanity is the ability to think and behave in a normal rational manner, and to exhibit rational behaviour. In Shakespeare’s play “King Lear” however, it is shown that “sanity” is a relative concept that can vary in meaning. Relating to the outside world, utilizing present issues of many countries, sanity being based on relativity, can be greatly exemplified. By performing an in depth analysis of different perspectives on sanity, it can be revealed who is sane and who is not. In the dramatic play, “King Lear”, King Lear assumes that his own character completely mirrors the quality of sanity. Displaying sane characteristics requires one to be completely assertive of the decisions that one makes personally, Lear’s actions are consciously made by him, and he knows exactly what he wants to say. He decides to divide his own kingdom and properties, and he wishes all three of his daughters to express their love for him. While Goneril and Regan claim their (faux) admiration of their father Lear is tremendous, Cordelia expressed nothing but her own genuine feelings. Unable to either express or translate her feelings into words, Cordelia explains to Lear that she is unable to verbally profess her love. In reply, Lear bursts with cursing...

Words: 721 - Pages: 3