Free Essay

International Jv and Us Auto Industry

In: Business and Management

Submitted By minerva123
Words 4699
Pages 19
INTERNATIONAL JOINT
VENTURES AND THE U.S.
AUTO INDUSTRY
Darwin Wassink
Robert Carbaugh

In 1983 General Motors Inc. and Toyota Inc. formed a joint venture, the New United Motor Manufacturing Inc., to assemble auios in the United
States. For Toyota, the venture was a first attempt to locate production in
America. General Motors viewed the venture as a means of learning how to produce low-cost, high quality, small vehicles. Facing an onslaught of anti-union Japanese firms, the United Auto Workers had to demonstrate that unions would not be an impediment to Japanese production in the
United States. By 1986 the venture was termed a success. This paper considers the welfare effects of international joint ventures among compettng manufacturers, as applied to the U.S. auto industry.

Darwin Wassink is Professor of Economics at the University of WisconsinEau Claire. Previously he served as an economist in Pakistan and Saudi
Arabia.
Robert Carbaugh is Associate Professor of Economics at Central
Washington University. He is author of International Economics and coauthor of The International Monetary System.
ISSN: 088i~390H. THE iNTERNATlONAL

TRADEJOVRNAL,Volu>ne

I No. I. hall 1986

47

48

THE INTERNATIONAL TRADE JOURNAL

The American auto industry is undergoing an evolution in which the
"all American car" is rapidly becoming a thing of the past. Although
American automakers will continue to develop and build their own mid-size and large autos in the United States, they are turning over increasing amounts of small-car production to foreign competitors, mainly the
Japanese. This process intensifies the demands for protectionism among
American auto workers. Reflecting this trend, in 1984 General Motors Inc. and Toyota Inc. of Japan formed a joint venture which assembles subcompact autos for sale in the United States, This paper examines possible welfare effects of international joint ventures among competing auto producers,
INTERNATIONAL JOINT VENTURES
The trend coward the internationalization of the American auto industry is documented by an increasing variety of commerical interrelationships between American and foreign automakers. For example.
General Motors owns 34 percent of Isuzu and 5 percent of Suzuki; Ford owns 25 percent of Mazda and Chrysler owns 15 percent of Mitsubishi.
Internationalization also includes the production of foreign cars in the
United States --such as Accords being produced in the Honda plant in
Marysville, Ohio-- just as It does the production of American-brand cars overseas, such as the Ford Escort being manufactured in Western European plants. It involves the marketing of foreign-produced autos under domestic nameplates, such as the Chrysler "Colt" produced In Japan by Mitsubishi and shipped to the United States. The installation of foreign-produced components in U-S. automobiles also reflects the internationalization trend.
Finally, the General Motors-Toyota and Chrysler-Mitsubishi joint ventures, to assemble subcompact cars in the United States, indicate a fundamental shift in thinking about the way to produce and market automobiles.
If a company is to participate in interniitional business, it must enjoy some advantage over foreign firms. A cost advantage is necessary If the company is to export. Licensing is profitable only if the company owns a

Wassink

and Carbaugh:

I n t e r n a t i o n a l Joint

Ventures

...

4 9

production process or patent that can be transferred overseas for a fee.
Establishing foreign subsidiaries requires the company to have an advantage over local firms in the country where the subsidiary is established.
In a trend that accelerated during the 198O's, companies have linked up with their former rivals in a vast array of joint ventures, A joint venture is a business organization established by two or more companies that combine their skills and assets. It may have a limited objective (e.g. research or production) and be short lived. Joint ventures may be multinational in character. Involving cooperation among domestic and foreign companies.
Joint ventures differ from mergers in that they involve the creation of a new business firm, rather than the union of two existing companies. Table 1
(page 50) provides examples of recent joint ventures between American and foreign companies.
There are several types of international joint ventures. First is a joint venture formed by two firms which conducts a business in a third country.
For example, an American oil firm and a British oil firm may form a joint venture for oil exploration in the Middle East. Next is the formation of a joint venture with local private interests. Honeywell Information Systems
Inc. of Japan was formed by Honeywell Inc. of the United States and
Mitsubishi Office Machinery Co, of Japan to sell information systems, equipment to the Japanese. Last is a joint venture which includes local government participation. Bechtel Co. of the United States, MesserschmittBoeikow-Blom of West Germany, and The National Iranian Oil Co.
(representing the government of Iran) formed Iran Oil Investment Co, for oil extraction in Iran,
The joint ventures between LI,S, and Japanese auto manufacturers have been formed to provide benefits to both the US, and Japanese firms, U.S, auto manufacturers see the joint venture as a method of learning more about the efficiencies of Japanese production techniques. This, they believe, will allow them to reduce production costs and improve efficiency over those levels that would occur if they undertook production on their own. Japanese producers see these joint ventures a*s an additional mt-thod of penetrating

C/5

-Si

2

<

a.
O

-a o — —

2

c:

6 Ji

^
D. pa

e e

O a-

oi < w

z o w
Pi

O
Q

a:

o

c a, a

a

CL,

OH

c o a.

C

'S o c

o —


W
CO

-o

w
H

•?=

1
«

O4

"^

u

ii*

2 a

H

•-'

T.

^

O

V

^

C

1*

III

C

i>

X X O D

I a o

I I


O


I

I c o

2 ° c >
O
I—.

o oi c/)

C

-a c ? E °
2 0 2

o

3
C

,™

c

c

X o ^ H

Wassink and Carbaugh: Internationa/Joint Ventures .

the American market as well as, and probably more importantly as, a way to reduce their vulnerability to potential protectionist actions by the United
States.
International joint ventures can yield both welfare-increasing effects and welfare-decreasing effects for the domestic economy. Joint ventures lead to welfare gains when: (1) the newly-established joint venture adds to preexisting productive capacity and fosters additional competition; (2) the newly-established joint venture is able to enter new markets that neither parent could have entered individually; (3) the joinr venture yields cost reductions (e.g. economies of scale) chat would have been unavailable if each parent performed the same function separately. However, the formation of a joint venture may give rise to increased market power, suggesting greater ability to influence market output and price. This could especially occur when the joint venture is formed in markets in which the parents conduct business. Under such circumstances, the parents, through their representatives in the joint venture, agree on prices and output in the very market which they themselves operate. Such coordination of activities limits competition, reinforces upward pressure on prices, and lowers the level of domestic welfare.
The example below contrasts two situations: (1) where two competing firms sell autos in the domestic market; (2) where the two competitors form a joint venture which operates as a single seller (i.e. monopoly) in the domestic market. We would expect to see a higher price and smaller quantity in the case where the joint venture behaves as a monopoly. This will always occur as long as the marginal cost curve for the joint venture is identical to the horizontal sum of the marginal cost curves of the Individual competitors. The result of this market power ejfeet is a deadweight welfare loss for the domestic economy--a reduction in consumer surplus that is not offset by a corresponding gain to producers. If, however, the formation of the joint venture entails productivity gains that neither parent firm could realize prior to its formation, domestic welfare would be increased. This is because a smaller amount oi the .domestic economy s resources is now required to produce any given output. Whether domestic welfare rises or

32

THE INTERNATIONAL TRADE JOURNAL

falls because of the joint venture depends on the magnitudes of these two opposing forces.
Figure I (page 53) illustrates the welfare effects of two parent firms which form a joint venture in the market in which they operate. Assume that Sony Auto Co. of Japan and American Auto Co. of the United States are the only two firms producing autos for sale in the U.S. market. Suppose each firm realizes constant long-run costs, suggesting that average total cost equals marginal cost at each level of output. Let the cost schedules of each firm prior to the formation of the joint venture equal MCQ = ATCQ , which equal $10,000. MCQ = ATCQ thus becomes the long run market supply schedule of autos.
Assume that Sony Auto Co. and American Auto Co. initially operate as competitors, charging a price equal to marginal cost. In Figure 1, market equilibrium exists at point A where 100 autos are sold at a price of $ 10,000 per unit. Consumer surplus totals area a'^ b + c. Producer surplus does not exist given the horizontal supply curve of autos. Now suppose the two firms announce the formation of a joint venture known as JV Co., which manufactures autos for sale in the United States. Assume the autos sold by
JV Co. replace the autos sold by the two parents in the United States.
Suppose the formation of JV Co. entails new production efficiencies which result in cost reductions. Let JV Co.'s cost schedule, MC, = ATC, be located at $7,000. As a monopoly, JV Co. maximizes profit by equating marginal revenue with marginal cost. Market equilibrium exists at point B, where 90 autos are sold at a price of $12,000 per unit. The price increase leads to a reduction in consumer surplus equal to area a+ h.Of this amount, area a is transferred to JV Co. as producer surplus. Area b represents the loss of consumer surplus not transferred to JV Co., and becomes a deadweight welfare loss for the U.S. economy (i.e. consumption effect).
Against this deadweight welfare loss lies the efficiency effect of JV Co. which entails unit costs falling from $10,000 to $7,000 per auto. JV Co. can produce its profit-maximizing output, 90 autos, at a cost reduction equal to area d as compared to the costs that would exist If the parent firms

Wassink and Carbaugh: International joint Ventures . . .

FIGURE I
WELFARE EFFECTS OF
AN INTERNATIONAL JOINT VENTURE

12.000 -



Sony Auto Co.
10,000
American Auto Co.

7.000

- ATC|

JVCo,

Demand

J

I iOO Autos

54

THE INTERNATIONAL TRADE JOURNAL

produced the same output. Area d thus represents additional producer surplus which is a welfare gain for the U.S. economy. The analysis concludes that for the United States, the formation of JV Co. is desirable if area d exceeds area b.
It has been assumed that JV Co. entails cost reductions that are the basis for output and price determination (MCj ^ which are unavailable to either parent as a stand-alone company. Whether the cost reductions benefit the overall U.S. economy depends on many factors. If the cost reductions result from productivity improvements (e.g. new work rules leading to higher output per worker), a welfare gain exists for the economy since fewer resources are required to produce a given number of autos and can be shifted to other industries. However, cost reductions stemming from JV Co. s formation can be monetary in nature. To the extent that JV Co., being a newly-formed company, is able to negotiate wage concessions from domestic workers which could not be achieved by American Auto Co., the cost reductions would represent a transfer of dollars from domestic workers to the economy (consumers in terms of lower prices and JV Co. profits).
This share of the lower costs (area below the dashed line within d) is not a welfare gain for the United States economy. The analysis of the desirability of this joint venture depends on the area above the dashed line in d being greater than the area b.
Another factor is the effect of the joint venture on Sony Auto Co. s profits. Before the establishment of the American joint venture, Sony Auto
Co. earned profits on its auto production injapan. After shifting production to the joint venture, Sony Auto Co. profits are earned in the United States and repatriated to Japan. However, in this case they are subject to the U.S. corporate income tax. To the extent that these tax revenues are an addition to the U.S. economy, that would not have resulted from the separate companies; this would lower the dashed line in area d and increase the welfare benefits to the U.S. economy.
NEW UNITED MOTOR MANUFACTURING INC
A widely publicized international joint venture was announced in 1983 by General Motors and Toyota Motor Corporation, the first and third

Wassink and Carbaugh: International Joint Ventures

largest auto companies in the world. With the approval of the Federal Trade
Commission, the two competitors agreed to form a new separate corporation for a twelve-year period, called New United Motor Manufacturing
Inc. (NUMMl). General Motors and Toyota each own half of NUMMI.
Located at an idle GM plant in Freemont, California, NUMMI produces Chevrolet Novas, a compact car based on the design of the Toyota
Corolla. The Nova does not represent a new car developed for the American market. Toyota designed the manufacturing layout, coordinated acquisition and installation of equipment, and implemented its production system.
NUMMI has a production capacity of 200,000 Novas per year. The Novas are sold to General Motors for distribution through its dealers. General
Motors has the sole responsibility for pricing the vehicle. Toyota and other
Japanese manufacturers supply approximately fifty percent of the value of the vehicle. Major components supplied by thejapanese include engine and transmission, while the Freemont plant conducts stamping and assembly.
American companies supply to NUMMI such items as batteries, glass, headliners, paint and sealants, and air conditioner components.
General Motors' announced goal was to learn the Japanese art of management and small-car manufacturing by getting a first-hand look at how Toyota organizes its operations, motivates its workers, and locates machines and materials. General Motors maintained that if it learned how to build lower-cost cars, it would transfer those cost-saving methods to its other plan,ts. It was estimated that General Motors would save as much as
$ 1,000 per car because it did not have to design a new auto from the ground up. Using Japanese-made components was estimated to save an additional
$700 per car.
NUMMI's production system is based on that of the Toyota Motor
Corporation. Two of the more important techniques used by NUMMI are the "just in time" and "Jidoka" quality principles. The "just in time" system

T h e All-American Small Car is Fading," Business Week. March 12, 1984.

THE INTERNATIONAL TRADE JOURNAL

of parts logistics results in NUMMI carrying only three to four days of parts inventory with little or no warehousing in between. This system of tightly controlled parts inventories and close coordination with suppliers is intended to avoid production bottlenecks and yield operating efficiencies.
The "Jidoka" technique results in machines or the production process itself stopping automatically in abnormal situations, such as a machinery breakdown, permitting speedy correction of the situation. Stopping the production line in case of some abnormality also applies to workers who have a stop button at each job sire and the authority to stop the production process at their discretion.
Another potential area of cost-savings comes from NUMMI's efforts to eliminate the job demarcation problems that plague most American auto plants. NUMMI utilizes simpler and more flexible job classifications, work rules, and procedures which are intended to increase labor productivity. In the manufacturing area, there are two groups of employees—production workers and skilled trade workers. The latter group consists of three classifications-tool and die, power house skilled tradesmen, and general maintenance skilled tradesmen. In contrast, some GM plants have more than one hundred job classifications. On NUMMI assembly lines, employees work in teams of five to ten members, each person performing up to fifteen separate jobs. Every production worker learns the job of everyone else on the team in case of absence. Workers regularly rotate jobs for fairness and to relieve boredom. Each team has complete jurisdiction over its own operation, including quality and any improvements in the production process. NUMMI management thus has greater flexibility in assigning jobs, which permits fewer assemblers and quality inspectors to be hired. In return for these concessions from the UAW union, NUMMI pays its workers prevailing wage and benefit rates for new hires in the industry. NUMMI has pledged that its workers would not lose jobs because of automation.
For Toyota, NUMMI represents a relatively low-cost opportunity to test the transferabitity of its production techniques overseas. It provides
Toyota a quick way to learn how to operate in the United States with a partner who knows the ins and outs of the American auto market. Toyota

Wassink and Carbaugh: International Joint Ventures

57

also views a manufacturing foothold in the United States as insurance against rising protectionism in the United States.
The above advantages were confirmed by Toyota's December 1985 announcement to locate its first US. car assembly plant in Georgetown,
Kentucky. Toyota plans to build as many as 200,000 midsize Camry models a year for the U.S. market by 1989. Toyota indicated that UAW representation at the Georgetown plant will probably come as a matter of course. By choosing Georgetown, Toyota is locating itself amid automotive supply companies, many of which are Japanese. This will help enable Toyota to maintain a tightly controlled parts inventory system with suppliers. It was also indicated that the mid-South provided an atmosphere where Toyota knows the Japanese have succeeded in the past (e.g. Honda's plant in Ohio,
Nissan's plant in Tennessee), What's more, workers in the mid-South have not demanded the same restrictive work rules that are found in most Big
Three plants, which are viewed as a major source of Japanese auto makers' cost advantage.
When the Federal Trade Commission accepted a consent agreement with General Motors and Toyota, the Commission majority cited three major procompetitive benefits for the automobile industry from the joint venture. (I) The joint venture would likely increase the total number of small cars available in America, allowing consumers greater choice at lower prices. (2) The joint-venture car would cost less to produce than if General
Motors were forced to rely on other alternatives. (3) The venture permitted a valuable opportunity for General Motors to complete its learning of the more efficient Japanese manufacturing techniques.
Dissenting Commissioners argued that since the joint venture was the offspring of the first and third largest auto manufacturers in the world, competition would be lessened and the new-car prices would increase. Also,
General Motors and Toyota would be able to exchange anticompetitive

''Toyota is Said to Pick Site in Kentucky for its First Car Assembly Plane in U.S." The
Wall Street journal. Decennber 4, 1985.

38

THE INTERNATIONAL TRADE JOURNAL

information, thus blunting competition. Any efficiencies that General
Motors might learn from Toyota would be limited mainly to assembly and stamping processes, since Toyota designed the new car and produced the sophisticated components in Japan. Furthermore, it was argued that
General Motors had already implemented many Japanese techniques without Toyota's help, and that process would continue unabated. It was maintained that General Motors could learn about efficiences from its two other Japanese partners and did not need Toyota.
Critics of NUMMI also maintained that it would result in job losses for
Americans. At the NUMMI plant, up to 5,000 new jobs would be generated.
However, only fifty percent of the Nova is sourced in the United States, the remainder representing Japanese production. Because the Nova was to replace GM"s Chevette, with almost one hundred percent American content, the result would be an overall job loss for American workers.
Moreover, most sophisticated systems and components for the Nova would be produced injapan, providing high-skilled jobs for the Japanese. Back in
America, workers put the final pieces together, which resulted in lowskilled jobs that would become increasingly automated in the years ahead.
In terms of the model presented in Figure 1, it appears that the cost reductions that accrue to NUMMI, compared to the costs achieved by
General Motors when it produces compact autos independently, can be attributed to two sources. First, there will be significant cost reductions from the imported components produced by Toyota. This estimated cost reduction of $700, as reported in Business Week, is not a saving to the U.S. economy. It reflects a reduction based on the lower production costs in
Japan. But this benefit would equally accrue to the U.S. consumer if Japanese autos were instead imported. The same would be true of the cost savings

3,,

"The GM Toyota Linkup Could Change the lndu.stry," Businers Week. December 24,
1984. ^
"General Motors Corp. and Toyota Motor Corp.: Proposed Consent Agreement With
Analysis to Aid Public Comment," Federal Registeryol 48, No. 250, December 28, 1983, pp.
67246-67257.

Wassink and Carbaugh: International Joint Ventures . . .

from design and research done in Japan rather than in the United States.
The important cost savings for the U.S. economy are the productive efficiencies that result from the adoption of Toyota labor practices and assembly line organization of the NUMMI plant. The amount of these savings has not been made public by NUMMI and is difficult to evaluate from the outside. However, critics of the FTC decision to consent to the joint venture estimated NUMMI's efficiency gains to be only $200 per vehicle, resulting in $40 million in total efficiency gains (NUMMI's production capacity equals 200,000 Novas per year). It is likely that General
Motors would contend that these figures underestimate NUMMTs efficiency gains. But it appears that the immediate benefits of NUMMI will be modest. The strongest support for the joint venture might be based on the potential learning-by-doing that could be transferred later to the organization of production in other auto manufacturing facilities of Cieneral
Motors. This possibility goes beyond our model and will continue to be a hypothetical benefit for years to come. It will not only be difficult to measure these gains, but nearly impossible to construct a counterfactural of how organization change would have occurred without this joint venture experience. As a result, it seems inappropriate to attribute large efficiency benefits to NUMMI.
Critics of the joint venture have expressed concern that the cooperation of Toyota and General Motors wilt lead toa joint exercise of market power. In 1984 Toyota and General Motors sold 1,559,980 vehicles rated as subcompacts or compacts out of an industry total of 5,300,000 small cars sold. As the dominant firms in the industry, Toyota and General Motors might use their market power so as to raise auto prices. If other companies followed the price increases of General Motors and Toyota, the losses to the
American consumer could easily exceed the efficiency gains on the small

Future of the Automobile Industry, Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Commerce,
Transportation, and Tourism, U.S. Hou.st- of Representatives, Ffbruyry 8, 1984, p. 286.

60

THE INTERNATIONAL TRADE JOURNAL

number of cars produced by NUMMI.
If the projected ef ficienq' gains of $200 per vehicle for annual output of
200,000 vehicles are achieved by NUMMI, this $40 million gain would be offset by a price increase of only $7.50 per vehicle for the 5,300.000 small cars sold in 1984. If only General Motors and Toyota raise prices on their models to reduce competition for the Nova, and other small car producers do not follow the price increase, a price increase of $25.65 on their models would offset the efficiency gains of NUMMI. If price increases in small cars spill over into price increases for large cars, as would be expected, it would require smaller price increases to offset the projected efficiency gains of
NUMMI.
Pricing behavior of General Motors and Toyota in the 1986 model year is difficult to evaluate. Toyota prices are likely to be influenced by changing exchange rates, as well as changing market conditions in the United States.
In the initial price announcements of General Motors, the increases in prices for models carried over from the 1985 model year showed approximately a five percent increase for small cars comparing 1985 model initial prices and ] 986 model initial prices. For large and luxury model cars, the price increases were substantially lower, while for midsize models the price increases by General Motors were larger. However, if the price increases on small cars were only one percent higher in 1986 than with full competition, this would amount to a $50 to $70 increase which would more than eliminate NUMMI's efficiency benefits to American consumers.
CONCLUSIONS
The overall impact of international joint ventures in the U.S. automobile industry will depend on two factors that are difficult to quantify.
Most analysts indicate that the immediate efficiency gains from jointventure auto production are relatively small. But if these gains can be transferred to all auto production by U.S. firms in a more rapid and efficient manner as a result of this process, the gains could be significant. The potential for losses to the U.S. economy depends on the effect of the joint venture on the competitiveness of the automobile market. If joint-venture

Wassink a n d Carbaugh: international foint Ventures . . .

6 1

production simply replaces former domestic production, as the Nova replaces the Chevette, and the cooperating firms develop implicit arrangements to segment the market and avoid direct competition, the resulting market power could lead to higher profits at the expense of the
American consumer. Any business arrangement that allows firms in an oligopolistic market to cooperate tends to raise economists' suspicions.
Whether the FTC decision to consent to international joint ventures was good or bad will remain difficult to evaluate.

62

THE INTERNATIONAL TRADE JOURNAL

REFERENCES

1.

A. Altschuler, The Euture of the Automobile
Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1984).

(Cambridge,

2. F.R. Artisien and P.J. Buckley, "Joint Ventures in Yugoslavia,"/ottr«*j/ of Intemational Business Studies, 16, No. 2 (1985), pp. 111-136.
3.

RJ. Carbaugh and D. Wassink, "joint Ventures, Voluntary Export
Quotas, and Domestic Content Requirements," Quarterly Joumal of
Business and Economics, 24, No. 2 (1985), pp. 21-36.

4.

W.R. Cline, International Trade in Automobiles (Cambridge,
Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1984).

3. E.J. Contractor, "A Generalized Theorem for Joint Venture and
Licensing Negotiations," Joumal of International Business Studies, 16,
No. 2 (1985), pp. 23-50.
6.

R. Crandall, "Import Quotas and the Costs of Protectionism," The
Brookings Review (Summer, 1984), pp. 8-16.

7. J. Grunwald and K. Flamm, The Global Factory: Eoreign Assembly in
International Trade (Washington, D.C: The Brookings Institution,
1985).
8.

R.D. Hall, The International Joint Venture (New York: Praeger
Publishers, 1984).

9.

K.P. Harrigan, Strategies for Joint Ventures
Massachusetts: Lexington Books, 1985).

(Lexington,

10. KJ. Hladik, International Joint Ventures (Lexington, Massachusetts:
Lexington Books, 1985).
11. J.P. Killing, Strategies for Joint Venture Success (New York: Praeger
Publishers, 1983).

Wassink

and Carbaugh:

I n t e m a t i o n a l Joint

Ventures . . .

6 3

1 2 . C. Oman, New Forms of International Investment in Developing
Countries (Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development, 1984).
13. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, LongTerm Outlook for the World Automobile Industry (Paris: 1984).
14. R. Reich, "Collusion Course: GM's Pact with Toyota is a Cover for
Surrender," New Republic (February 27, 1984).
15.

, "Japan Inc., USA; If You Can't Beat Them, Joint Venture
With Them," New Republic (November 26, 1984).

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Cherys

...FCjhANALYZING CHINA’S AUTOMOBILE INDUSTRY COMPETITIVENESS THROUGH PORTER’S DIAMOND MODEL DI WU Bachelor of Management, University of Lethbridge, 2004 A Research Project Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies of the University of Lethbridge in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF SCIENCE IN MANAGEMENT Faculty of Management University of Lethbridge LETHBRIDGE, ALBERTA, CANADA © Di Wu, 2006 (Approval/ Signature page) ii Abstract This paper incorporates Porter’s diamond model to analyze China’s automobile industry. Besides looking at the four determinants of competitiveness in the original model, this study specifically examines the impact of government on industry competitiveness. This study retrieves archival data on multi-measurements used in prior studies. The author incorporates one case study of a Chinese auto firm to illustrate the specific impact of government policy and the responses of auto assemblers and component suppliers. Interviews with experts in auto-related industries are conducted to triangulate the findings. Results show that the Chinese auto industry is still in its early stages of development, whereas product quality and economies of scale of domestic automakers are approaching global standards; thus Chinese auto firms aim at becoming major players in the international market. The government plays an active role in assisting the industry development as the nation transitions from a planned economy to a free...

Words: 30906 - Pages: 124

Premium Essay

Wil-Mor Technologies: Is There a Crisis?

...Case Analysis Wil-Mor Technologies: Is There A Crisis? November 2, 2010 Executive Summary After nearly four years since its founding, Wil-Mor, the joint venture (JV) between American-owned parts manufacturer, Wilson, and Japanese-owned manufacturer, Morota – is fast approaching a crossroads. The JV was formed in 1993 to support the “transplant” model of assembling Japanese-designed cars in the United States. From an American business mindset, Japanese automakers like Toyota, Honda, and Nissan had a fiercely, almost irrational, loyalty to their suppliers. This loyalty, coupled with the growing market share of Japanese cars and increased domestic supplier competition, made the Wil-Mor JV a natural outgrowth for longstanding licensing partners Wilson and Morota. However, Wil-Mor’s first 18 months was fraught with unexpected setbacks. Neither parent company anticipated the leadership characteristics required to harmonize cultural differences and Wil-Mor’s initial leadership proved so divisive that it had to be removed after a year into operations. Start-up times and costs were much higher than Wilson – and the Wil-Mor pro-forma – predicted. While Japanese quality standards were known to be high, the costs associated with quality (i.e. reduced production output) was also greater than Wil-Mor predicted. And, until recently, Wilson was unaware that the two parent companies had very different definitions of Wil-Mor “success:” Morota’s main aim was to ensure their...

Words: 4795 - Pages: 20

Premium Essay

2101

...Which foreign markets? * Assessment of nations long run profit potential * Assess overall attractiveness of model * Suitability of product to that region * Nature of indigenous competitors 2) Timing of entry * Consider first mover advantages a) ability to pre-empt rivals and capture demand by establishing strong brand name b) ability to build sales volume before other entrants cost savings allow you to further cut your costs c) create switching costs that tie customers into products * first mover disadvantages a) pioneering costs: costs that firms have to bear that late entrants can avoid… eg cost of business failure b) research shows that higher probability of survival of an international business after several firms done so c) costs of promoting and marketing the product in a new market 3) scale of entry and strategic commitments * entering market on large scale involve commitment of significant resources; also provides rapid entry * CSL – acquire – avoids cost of foreign liability * Other companies prefer to go in on small scale and expand from there * Large scale entry i) Positive: easier for company to attract customers and distributors… large scale allows people to believe they will be sustainable in long run, EOS, first mover etc ii) Negative: less resources because spent all on expansion…...

Words: 2246 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

International Business Strategy of Volkswagen

...2012 International Business Globalization - Volkswagen Akshayita Saxena Anirudh Kunjal Avinash Unni Nair Nilisha Aggarwal Rahul Raghunathan Raj Jatheendran Santosh Gaurav Volkswagen – Das Auto INTRODUCTION : A BRIEF HISTORY Volkswagen, in English, translates to “people’s car”, and the German Labour Front originally founded this company in 1937, with the sole purpose of manufacturing cars for the common man, in a German car market dominated by luxury cars. The People’s car, available at a mere 990 Mark, was positioned around factors such as better fuel efficiency, reliability, ease-of-use and economy of usage. Its first prototype, the kdF-Wagen, had a distinctive round shape to its design (the Beetle continues with this design even today) and had about 336,000 takers. By 1946, the Wolfsburg factory was producing close to 1000 cars a month, a remarkable feat in those times. Post the 2nd World War, Volkswagen served as an icon for the resurrection of West Germany, and showed signs of international expansion by selling its first model in the United States of America in 1949, and its sales services were standardized there by 1955. The Golf Type-I model, was given the title “Beetle” by the quirky, hugely popular advertisement campaigns run in the U.S. then, and was officially adopted by Volkswagen only in 1998. By 1961, VW expanded its production line to include Type-III and Type-IV models, and in 1964, VW bought over the Auto Union and the NSU, successfully creating a merger...

Words: 6449 - Pages: 26

Premium Essay

Market Analysis for Chery Automobile

...Chery Automobiles International Business Project Report 2014 Prepared by: Group 8, Section B Megha PGP17/093 Swati PGP17/117 Shreya PGP17/113 Umang PGP17/121 Ved PGP17/123 Contents Background of the company 3 Growth of the company 3 Chinese automotive industry 3 External Environment Analysis 4 Business Strategy 6 Internationalization 6 Competitive landscape 8 Chery automobile - During the recession 9 Chery automobile - After recession 10 Exhibits 11 References: 15 Background of the company Chery Automobile Co. Ltd is a government owned automobile manufacturing company in China founded in the year 1997.The product portfolio of Chery consists of 15 models which includes minivans, passenger cars and SUVs including the QQ compact, the A5 sedan, and V5 crossover.  It also offers full electric and hybrid models. The exports of Chery account to 25% of its total production and it is the largest passenger car exporter since 2003. Chery has manufacturing facilities in China and their assembly operations are in around 15 countries. It has factories in Ukraine, Egypt, Uruguay, Syria, China, Iran, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Brazil, Taiwan, Venezuela, and Vietnam. Apart from that, Chery also focuses on new product development and its R&D expenses accounts to 7 % of total revenue. Growth of the company Due to certain quality issues faced by the auto exports from China, expansion plans of Chery have been challenged. Chinese products were...

Words: 3636 - Pages: 15

Premium Essay

Paper Automotive

...INDIAN AUTO COMPONENT INDUSTRY AN OVERVIEW 1 Contents 1 2 3 4 5 6 About ACMA Indian Economy Automotive Industry Auto Component Industry of India Vision 2020 Capabilities & Challenges of Component Suppliers The Way Forward 7 2 Introduction Automotive Component Manufacturers Association of India Role An apex agency of the Indian Automotive Industry auto component output in the organized sector 600+ companies forming majority of the Members Quality System ACMA operates on Quality System based on ISO 9001:2000 As Automotive Component Manufacturers Association of India in the year 1982 Re-Christened Inception In the year 1959 as The All India Automobile & Ancillary Industries Association (AIA & AIA) 3 ACMA and Its Services Promotes Indian Automotive Component Industry Trade Promotion Technology Up-gradation Quality Enhancement Collection & Dissemination of Information Vital Catalyst for Industrial Development 4 International Business Development Promote India Promote India as a Brand as a Brand Organize Business Organize Business Development Delegation Development Delegation Overseas Overseas Undertake Export Undertake Export Promotional Promotional Projects Projects Organize Participation Organize Participation in Overseas in Overseas Automobile Automobile Exhibitions & Fairs Exhibitions & Fairs Global Interaction Global Interaction through through Counterpart Association Counterpart Association ...

Words: 3209 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

Vietnam Auto

...www.businessmonitor.com Q1 2012 VIeTNAM AUTOS RepORT INCLUDES BMI'S FORECASTS ISSN 1749-0286 published by Business Monitor International Ltd. VIETNAM AUTOS REPORT Q1 2012 INCLUDING 5-YEAR FORECASTS TO 2016 Part of BMI’s Industry Report & Forecasts Series Published by: Business Monitor International Copy deadline: October 2011 Business Monitor International 85 Queen Victoria Street London, EC4V 4AB UK Tel: +44 (0) 20 7248 0468 Fax: +44 (0) 20 7248 0467 Email: subs@businessmonitor.com Web: http://www.businessmonitor.com © 2011 Business Monitor International. All rights reserved. All information contained in this publication is copyrighted in the name of Business Monitor International, and as such no part of this publication may be reproduced, repackaged, redistributed, resold in whole or in any part, or used in any form or by any means graphic, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping, or by information storage or retrieval, or by any other means, without the express written consent of the publisher. DISCLAIMER All information contained in this publication has been researched and compiled from sources believed to be accurate and reliable at the time of publishing. However, in view of the natural scope for human and/or mechanical error, either at source or during production, Business Monitor International accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss or damage resulting from errors, inaccuracies or omissions affecting any...

Words: 14747 - Pages: 59

Premium Essay

China Jaguar

...landrover in china Whether to ma nufacture or not… The market for premium cars in China, estimated to be 400,000 units, accounts for only 7 per cent of the total passenger vehicle market in the nation much lower than 15 to 20 per cent in developed economies. The segment however is experiencing massive growth. It is expected to grow by 100 per cent by 2015 and further reach 1.4 million units by 2020[1]. The main factors driving the growth are the increase in income of the Chinese consumers as well as shift in socio-cultural factors.   In 2009, there were 477,000 millionaires in China as opposed to 2.9 million in the United States.  However, 206 of every 1000 Chinese millionaires bought a super-luxury car while only 78 per 1000 did in US[2]. As the figure represents, there is a greater propensity to spend money on premium cars in China. A premium car represents a milestone in a (mostly young and typically from real estate, finance and mining and export businesses) Chinese’s life and uplifts his social standing. The market is expected to further grow disproportionately with the rise of Chinese elite. For reference, it is expected that 3.5 million people in China will have the financial means to buy a premium car by 2015 up from 1.8 million today. Furthermore, the global exposure and education has also contributed to a greater awareness of premium cars and differentiation from mass segment. There is thus a tremendous scope for Jaguar Land Rover to further exploit this opportunity...

Words: 2823 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

India Automobile Industry

...WORKING PAPER Influence of Government Policies on Industry Development: The Case of India’s Automotive Industry Mahipat Ranawat Rajnish Tiwari March 2009 Working Paper No. 57 Hamburg University of Technology Schwarzenbergstr. 95, D-21073 Hamburg, Germany Tel.: +49 (0)40 42878-3777; Fax: +49 (0)40 42878-2867 www.tu-harburg.de/tim www.global-innovation.net Influence of Government Policies on Industry Development: The Case of India’s Automotive Industry By Mahipat Ranawat and Rajnish Tiwari Hamburg University of Technology Institute of Technology and Innovation Management Schwarzenbergstr. 95, 21073 Hamburg (Germany) Tel. +49 – (0)40 – 428 78 – 3776, Fax: +49 – (0)40 – 428 78 – 2867 mahipat.ranawat@tuhh.de; rajnish.tiwari@tuhh.de www.tuhh.de/tim; www.global-innovation.net Abstract The automotive industry in India has come a long way from its nascent state at the time of India’s independence in 1947 to its present day dynamic form. As compared to the production of mere 4,000 vehicles in 1950, the production of the industry crossed the historic landmark of 10 million vehicles in 2006. Today, the industry produces a wide range of automobiles and auto-components catering to both the domestic as well as foreign markets. The development of the industry has been shaped by the demand on the one hand and the government interventions on the other; the influence of the latter being considerable. The evolution of India’s automotive industry is identified to have occurred in four phases. In...

Words: 30288 - Pages: 122

Premium Essay

Conditions in Russia and Their Effect on Mnc's Entry Mode Desicions

...products in Russia via representative/sales offices – was obtained by means of personal interviews with senior management in Moscow and constituted the primary qualitative data. Research questions are posed for further examination of conditions in Russia and the effects of such conditions on the entry mode decisions of MMEs. The study finds economic conditions to be the only important determinant of entry modes for large multinational manufacturing companies investing in Russia with other country factors playing no role in their choices. INTRODUCTION With the expansion of global business activity, the ability to analyze the key characteristics of potential host countries becomes increasingly important. The key to successful international market entry is an understanding of differences in conditions that exist when comparing one market to another. While developed countries still remain the major destination for foreign direct investment (FDI), emerging economies have become increasingly important locations for MMEs’ production. Changes...

Words: 6551 - Pages: 27

Premium Essay

Homework

...subsidiaries there. They are often criticized as being runaway corporations.Economists are not in agreement as to how multinational or transnational corporations should be defined. Multinational corporations have many dimensions and can be viewed from several perspectives (ownership, management, strategy and structural, etc.) The following is an excerpt from Franklin Root, International Trade and Investment | Ownership criterion | Some argue that ownership is a key criterion. A firm becomes multinational only when the headquarter or parent company is effectively owned by nationals of two or more countries. For example, Shell and Unilever, controlled by British and Dutch interests, are good examples. However, by ownership test, very few multinationals are multinational. The ownership of most MNCs are uninational. (e.g., the Smith-Corona versus Brothers case) Depending on the case, each is considered an American multinational company in one case, and each is considered a foreign multinational in another case. Thus, ownership does not really matter. | Nationality mix of headquarter managers | An international company is multinational if the managers of the parent company are nationals of several countries. Usually, managers of the headquarters are nationals of the home country. This may be a transitional phenomenon. Very few companies pass this test currently. | Business Strategy |  global profit maximizationsome are home country oriented,others are host country oriented...

Words: 2635 - Pages: 11

Free Essay

Chery Automobile

...In order to analyses the present situation, we mainly focus on its internationalization process, its domestic market as well as international market, and its strategy of growth. And it is supported with different theories such as SWOT analysis, PEST analysis, Porter 5 Forces, 4Ps. 1.1 Chery at a Glance Chery is one of the Chinese fast growing state owned enterprise founded on 1997.with a capital of CNY 3.68 billion, and its first car came on a production on 1999. At present Chery owns for sub-brands, chery, karry , Rilich and rely. Currently Chery has 16 different module in maket and it possesses an annual production capacity of 900,000 automobiles. (Chery) . With the strategy of ‘Going out’ Chery become the first Chinese automobile company to export its production in overseas, including more then 80 countries. It offers cars, sedans, SUVs, and mini-vans on its different segment. Source – Chery International Co. ltd This figure show that, the total sale of Chery automobile is been increasing in every year, in the year 2008 its sale is 356,000 unit which is decrees by small present comparing to 381,000 on previous year 2007. Competition is the causes as Chery Chairma Yin Tongyue said “Competition in the Chinese automobile market would be extremely fierce this year” (Reuturs, 2009) and due to the effect of global recession. 2. Chinese auto market Source- china car times According to the, china car times. Top 3...

Words: 3039 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

International Marketing

...Submitted By: Ankur Chauhan Roll No: 09 PGDM IB 2013-15(IIIrd trim) Submitted By: Ankur Chauhan Roll No: 09 PGDM IB 2013-15(IIIrd trim) GUIDE: Dr. POONAM CHAUHAN GUIDE: Dr. POONAM CHAUHAN International Marketing Strategy in Automobile Sector in Emerging market International Marketing Strategy in Automobile Sector in Emerging market Research Paper Research Paper Abstract Globalization has not only opened up new avenues for MNEs, but has also benefitted the emerging nations who have adapted to it. It has formed the basis of growth and development for most emerging nations of course other factors too are relevant). This research paper seeks to examine the international marketing strategies of MNEs in the automobile industry, specifically for the emerging nations, because as our subsequent findings will prove, that these markets are currently the most promising and will remain so at least for a few years to come. When we consider the emerging nations, the most promising ones are obviously the BRICs (reasons covered in the following sections). Hence, for readability and convenience purposes, we have limited our research to these nations. Keywords: Marketing strategy, BRIC, TRIAD, MNE, emerging markets, JV Objectives of Study: 1) International Marketing strategies followed by automotive companies in Emerging markets. 2) The study also aims at understanding whether the marketing strategy of these global automotive companies are justified by analysing...

Words: 4313 - Pages: 18

Free Essay

Dddddd

...Chapter 1 expanding abroad: motivations, means, and mentalities Case 1-1 Cameron Auto Parts * Alex Cameron got the family biz when graduated in 2001, when the American economy fell into a recession * History * Auto Pact, big three ship car parts between Canada & US, with tariff free * Cameron focus on small engine parts and auto accessories * Car Sales dropped in 2000, because declining North America and entry of Japanese * High pressure for modernization and cost reduction * Operational survival: cut workforce, overtime, part-time, subcontracting * Recovery and diversification * The short-term future seemed positive, but the popularity of Japanese car forced it to diversify * Working as an OEM Cameron did little to be innovative * Alex brought in a team of designers, concentrating on developing products with a wider ‘non-automotive’ market appeal * The first year no progress, Alex lured away a key engineer from the Canadian firm, and mid-2003, developed its own line of flexible couplings * Marketing the new product * Hired eight field sales representatives, stress product quality, service and speed of delivery, but not price. * Financing plant capacity * Increasing sales of flexible couplings required a new separate plant, but the financial position is not strong enough to support it * Foreign markets * Took a European Patent * A licensing opportunity ...

Words: 18260 - Pages: 74

Premium Essay

Indian Automobile Sector 2012

...THE INDIAN AUTOMOBILE SECTOR- HPL PROJECT Introduction The term automotive was created from Greek autos (self), and Latin motivus (of motion) to represent any form of self-powered vehicle. The Indian automotive industry has emerged as a 'sunrise sector' in the Indian economy. India is emerging as one of the world's fastest growing passenger car markets and second largest two wheeler manufacturer. It is also home for the largest motor cycle manufacturer and fifth largest commercial vehicle manufacturer. The automotive industry in India is one of the largest in the world and one of the fastest growing globally. India's passenger car and commercial vehicle manufacturing industry is the sixth largest in the world, with an annual production of more than 3.9 million units in 2011.[1] According to recent reports, India overtook Brazil and became the sixth largest passenger vehicle producer in the world (beating such old and new auto makers as Belgium, United Kingdom, Italy, Canada, Mexico, Russia, Spain, France, Brazil), growing 16 to 18 per cent to sell around three million units in the course of 2011-12.[2] In 2009, India emerged as Asia's fourth largest exporter of passenger cars, behind Japan, South Korea, and Thailand.[3] In 2010, India beat Thailand to become Asia's third largest exporter of passenger cars. As of 2010, India is home to 40 million passenger vehicles. More than 3.7 million automotive vehicles were produced in India in 2010 (an increase of 33.9%), making the...

Words: 6888 - Pages: 28