...Is Google Making Us Stupid? This article has a very strong grasp on effective writing, in order to explain, you have to understand what effective writing is. What is effective writing? In simple words, effective writing is a piece or writing that immediately involves the reader’s interest and carries the reader through to the final paragraph with no loss of concentration. Some may call it a narrative hook, designed to catch a reader’s attention with a great title but, as the reader reads on they come to find themselves lost having no understanding of what they have just read. As I sat down to write this review I had to make sure the document followed certain guidelines. Is the document able to achieve the purpose it’s intended for and, is the document able to get it across effectively? Is Google Making Us Stupid? At the beginning of the article, the writer uses a very catchy hook to draw the reader. When you ask a question with such great magnitude the reader has a hard time not to investigate. The article then goes on to talk about how technology has changed how we process information and, how we stop using our brains and traded it in for a computer. Technology today is far more advanced than it has been in the last 20 years and it will continue to advance further more in the following years. When reading this I began to question myself, is technology making me stupid? Looking over the past years at how much things have changed, I am inclined to agree that technology...
Words: 838 - Pages: 4
...Is Google making us stupid? ENG 111-29b Professor Ruth 09-10-2012 Davante Williams Once I read this article by Carr I began to think about what Carr was trying to say and explain to the reader this quote explains the idea that the Internet has not only completely changed our lives forever but that nobody really knows how the Internet is making and changing our world. I definitely believe that the Internet has changed my viewing of the world and made my life a whole lot easier. Along with the fact that the Internet has made my life easier, it has also made me a much lazier person just by the simple fact that I can type anything into any search engine, such as Google, and receive an answer just by a simple “click” of my mouse. It really has made me think and wonder what life would be like without Internet, I seriously cannot even imagine it. I have grown up with Internet and do not know life without it. I consider myself to be somewhat of a lazy person and tend to slack in some areas of my life, I have been seriously considering if I did not have Internet to simplify my life’s needs that maybe I would become an overall less lazy person. I think chances are high for that and that I definitely would become automatically less lazy. I definitely agree with the author in the sense that Google, along with everything on the Internet, has made the human race a much lazier group and rely on a piece of technology instead of relying on each other and trying to improve ourselves as...
Words: 757 - Pages: 4
...Essay 1: “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” summary and response Summary: In the article of “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”, Nicholas Carr argues that the Internet is changing the way our mind works and has some negative effects on our lives. In the article of “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”, Nicholas Carr argues that the Internet is changing the way our mind works and has some negative effects on our lives. The article begins with that the Internet is the excellent resource where we can find whatever we want for everything, and we are becoming more and more dependent on it in the field of writing, reading and so on. Afterwards, Carr claims that it has a large distraction on our mind, and we even cannot concentrate on a long reading material. As he said, technology is becoming more important than people. In the end, he also tells us that Google is trying to invent an artificial brain to replace our "slow" brains that we already have. In the article of “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”, Nicholas Carr argues that the Internet is changing the way our mind works and has some negative effects on our lives. He views the idea that the Internet is an obstacle for individuals to think deeply, and it is rebuilding our mind and memory. As Carr said, nowadays, it is so difficult for him to focus on a long paper; instead, he always spends a lot of time on the Internet. In the past, the writers like him should stay in the library to study for several days, but now, because of the Internet, it just...
Words: 879 - Pages: 4
...As a class assignment, I read an article called is Google making us stupid, by Nicholas car. The author describes the thought that the internet has not completely changed everyone lives forever but that nobody really knows how the internet is creating and changing our world. Reading this article made me come up with so many questions. What is the internet? What would it be like is there was never such thing called an internet? I definitely agree with the author that Google, and websites on the internet, has made us lazier and rely on technology rather than relying on each other and also trying to better ourselves as good people. I don’t think the internet has made us stupid because the internet opened up an entire new realm of studying and knowledge. I like goggle because it fun finding think u want to search for. This murder case is about two suspects who are accused of killing the victims. The victims are the former mother and father in laws of Mr. Gold. This murder took place on the night of September 26 1974- Yom Kippur, the Jewish Day of Atonement. Mr. Gold is a 51- year old psychotic man. He was in court for many trials. The first trial was consists of mistrial because Gold was impotent. The second suspect is Mr. Sandford, a 29 –year old former mental patient and member of the peddlers of evil motorcycle club, who committed suicide six weeks after the killing. Mr. Gold and Mr. Sandford could have been the murders because the evidence shows that they both committed the crime...
Words: 298 - Pages: 2
...Using google too often can cause internet addiction which will affect to people concentration, and deep thinking become hard abilities. People seek for easy ways to avoid sadness, stress, and fatigue like drinking alcohol can be one of the approaches to avoid life issues. Likewise, surfing internet and browsing to web pages are simple way to get information. In the article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Nicolas Carr argues that internet is negatively changing the way our mind works, in that, we would abuse the internet and not let our brains figure things out without the need of searching on Google. Throughout his article Carr gave examples and different people opinions on the same topic, which made the article even more credible and successful. This was very a good way to get his points across to the non-believes. Carr achievement with the use of rhetorical appeal and serious tone to obtain the reader attention and persuade them that in today’s society, the internet causes many problems. The article’s tittle brings a tough question to mind of readers. By using a movie scene and arguments embedded with imagery and metaphor “someone or something that tinkering with my brain, remapping the neural circuitry, reprogramming the memory.” (226). He also provides research on how other writers had agreed with him on the subject to help support his strategies of logos. He states that even as a writer his mind struggle to keep focus on a book. One example that he spoke about the research...
Words: 1126 - Pages: 5
...Nicholas Carr is the author of books concerning technology and culture. One of his most recent bestsellers regarding the topic is his work titled What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains. In the summer of 2008, Carr’s piece, Is Google Making Us Stupid?, was published in The Atlantic Monthly. In this essay, Carr declares that the Internet is altering the way people think (500). Carr writes that the Internet lowers the ability for concentration and consideration (501). He believes the ability to read and understand a lengthy piece of writing has also been practically entirely lost (Carr 501). Carr additionally states that the Internet has severed our capability to interpret text (502). Nicholas Carr backs up his claims with personal experience, personal opinions, quoting authorities, and referring to research that has been done on the topic. With his presentation of evidence, along with his unbiased language, I believe Carr is effective in supporting his claim. Even though Carr is writing about the negative effects of the Internet on our brains, he is not against technology or the Internet. He demonstrates this by saying “the Web has been a godsend to me as a writer. Research that once required days in the stacks or periodical rooms of libraries can now be done in minutes” (Carr 501). Carr also acknowledges that “the advantages of having immediate access to such an incredibly rich store of information are many” (501). With these mentions, he does not seem to be biased and completely...
Words: 882 - Pages: 4
...example and quoted a blogger, Bruce Friedman, as he explained how he majorly lost the way he takes in a long article on paper or print [316]. As well as scholars from the University College London also says that they think that it has changed the way we read and think. In Cullington’s article, she points out that the main idea of the article, if texting is affecting writing, that it has also changed the way things are today. It has changed the way people receive information just like reading a long page or even a few paragraphs. This may be in common of these two short writings, but there is another major point, as well as more, to be reviewed about which is important. One of these points are when we skim through readings. In “Is Google Making Us Stupid”, the British Library and U.K. educational consortium found that people formed a habit of skimming and going from one source to another without reading more than a page [316]. These authors found a study report that calls this action “power browsing” [317]. Although with cell phones we just might be reading more than we think we are today than we think we’ve been doing. Text messaging today is so popular that we just glance over what we type or read and send something back to be quick. Most texts are believed to lack emotion and so we send them as to be short and to the point. It makes it easier to send these quick electronic messages. It’s convenient to receive information through a message and reply when it’s a good time for you...
Words: 749 - Pages: 3
...Shawanda Owens ENG 112 D02P Kim Johnston 18 February 2015 “IS GOOGLE MAKING US STUPID” In this article, Nicholas Carr claims that the internet causes us to be distracted. He supports his claim with personal examples and stories of his acquaintances. Carr states that the internet is full of ads, hyperlinks, and other media that is meant to distract us. He is giving voice to these concerns, F or example; the one skill that he believes is being eroded, and also brought about change because of all the time spent online. As a writer, he finds the web a valuable tool, but he think it’s having a bad effect on concentration. Carr admits that we, as a culture, read a lot more because of the web, but passionately express our ability to interpret text, to make the rich mental connections that form when we read deeply and without distraction, remains largely disengaged. With that being said, I’ve noted with occasional and increasing concern that changes in the character of my attention and my use of down time. As the article warrants, I used to daydream and make random connections while standing in line at the grocery store, or during my lunch breaks. Now on the other hand, I look through my purse at every break. It feels like as times goes by and these trends continue, my attention deficit only increases. It worries me that my abstract thinking and personal reflection time are getting spent on interesting...
Words: 612 - Pages: 3
...Is Google Making Us Stupid Vera Simpson ENG140 Feburary 12, 2012 Is Google Making Us Stupid In the Atlantic Magazine, Nicholas Carr wrote an article, "Is Google Making Us Stupid?" Carr poses a good question about how the internet has affected our brain, by remapping the neural circuitry and reprogramming our memory. Carr states, "My mind isn't going-so far as I can tell-but it's changing. I'm not thinking the say way I used to think." Carr went on farther, saying that he cannot read as long as he used to, his concentration starts to wonder after two or three pages. He states, "he began to get fidgety and lose his focus and start looking for other things to do." Carr says this change is because he spend so much time on the internet, that as a writer, then he finds the Web to be very valuable to him getting information. Carr say to him and others, the internet is becoming a universal medium, that most information flows through your eyes and ears and into your mind. Wired's Clive Thompson says, "the net seems to be doing is chipping away the capacity for concentration and contemplation, that the mind now expects to take in information the internet distributes it; in a swiftly moving stream of particles." He uses for an example, "Once I was a scuba diver in the sea of words. Now I zip along the surface like a guy on a Jet Ski." The reason he says this is because why searching the internet we tend to just skim from site to site and to never return back to the same...
Words: 1187 - Pages: 5
...Is Google making us stupid? This text is an article by Nicholas Carr. The article was posted on www.theatlantic.com the 1st of July 2008. Primarily the text deals with how the Internet has affected the human brain through the years and the consequences of the constant and raising search on the Internet. Nicholas Carr has managed to write an article in an amazing way, in where he really catches the readers’ attention, even from the first lines. In this essay my focus will be the three appeals, the structure and the audience of this article. Nicholas Carr has managed to construct this article in a very remarkable way. He introduces the essay with sentences from a movie in which a supercomputer takes control of the world. Maybe Nicholas think that that supercomputer very well could be a regular computer today because in some way the computers have taken control over the human brain through the years. He claims this because every person nowadays have either a computer with Internet or at some point have been to the Internet elsewhere. He simply thinks that people have become too lazy and if something is bothering them, they can just pick up the computer, write a few lines and “bum” there’s their answer, to what they were looking for. Simple and easy. Nicholas also manages to make a link and a fluently transition between the introduction and the main text. In the end of the introduction it says, “I can feel it. I can feel it.” And when he starts the main text it says, “I can...
Words: 870 - Pages: 4
...Is Google Making Us Stupid? Over the years, the internet has drastically altered the way we take in information. In this article, Nicholas Carr’s argument explains how the internet has caused him to lose focus when reading critically. Overall, it is hurting our attention spans and distracting us from fully taking in the text we read. Because the internet gives us answers in almost no time at all, we’re not working as hard anymore to dig deep and find the answers ourselves. He concludes that the internet has changed the way we think and process information by hurting our reading and concentration skills. The author develops his argument by sharing how his own life has been affected by the internet. Because Google helps him get information quicker, his attentiveness when reading a book fades away after only a couple pages. He uses other peoples’ experiences as support, such as Scott Karp, an online media blogger, who has stopped reading books as a whole. He needs to skim through different articles online because he can’t take in reading at great length as much anymore. Additionally, the New York Times has conceded to the public and has included article abstracts to shorten their articles to benefit the average reader. Subsequently, he also lists a five year study in London that examined peoples’ behavior when visiting research sites. He explained that the study showed that people only scan the articles quickly before heading to a different site. Carr also supports his argument...
Words: 442 - Pages: 2
...In the article of “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Nicholas Carr argues that the Internet is changing the way our mind works and has some negative effects on our lives. The article begins with that the Internet is the excellent resource where we can find whatever we want for everything, and we are becoming more and more dependent on it in the field of writing, reading and so on. Afterwards, Carr claims that it has a large distraction on our mind, and we even cannot concentrate on a long reading material. As he said, technology is becoming more important than people. Nicholas Carr backs up his claims with personal experience, personal opinions, quoting authorities, and referring to research that has been done on the topic. With his presentation of evidence, along with his unbiased language, I believe Carr is effective in supporting his claim. Even though Carr is writing about the negative effects of the Internet on our brains, he is not against technology or the Internet. He demonstrates this by saying “the Web has been a godsend to me as a writer. Carr also acknowledges that “the advantages of having immediate access to such an incredibly rich store of information are many”. With these mentions, he does not seem to be biased and completely against the Internet. It appears he has a favorable outlook on the subject, so for him to present the facts of the negative side, I do not feel like he is being one-sided Carr’s use of quotations and research studies supports the...
Words: 421 - Pages: 2
...text rather than printed text is in the way it effects our critical thinking. The ways we use technologies develop habits of mind. Now days we seem to skim to quickly to find the information we need. While before we used to be able to read deep, intellectual books without any problem. While reading the text we multitask while on a screen. We are bombarded by colorful and exciting ads on every website makes it hard to concentrate.Our concentration starts to drift while reading books after two or three pages. “My mind isn’t going—so far as I can tell—but it’s changing. I’m not thinking the way I used to think. I can feel it most strongly when I’m reading. Immersing myself in a book or a lengthy article used to be easy.” (Carr, “ Is google making us stupid?”, theatlantic.com, July/August 2008 Issue) Carr talks about how over the past couple of years for him like someone or something has been “tinkering” with his brain, remapping and reprogramming it. As if he isn't losing it but its changed. How he once would...
Words: 1171 - Pages: 5
...Being efficient does not mean that we are giving up our opportunity of deep thinking. Google, and other new tools that we can use, is definitely bringing a mind change. As Nicholas Carr has noticed, those new tools and method lead to a change in our way of both learning and living. Max Planck once said, “A scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.” And it is the same case as Google. It is till being critiqued by the older generation and those who are advocates for our not changing, but our new generations are growing up with it. They have not experienced a life without it. Thereby, how do they know if it is good for us? It is always a good thing to change. We might not be able to prove if the change is benefit, but we will know. The most interesting thing I found in Carr’s paper is the example of how Socrates thought about writing. Here is how he says about it: “in Plato’s Phaedrus, Socrates bemoaned the development of writing. He feared that, as people came to rely on the written word as a substitute for the knowledge they used to carry inside their heads, they would, in the words of one of the dialogue’s characters, ‘cease to exercise their memory and become forgetful.’ And because they would be able to ‘receive a quantity of information without proper instruction,’ they would ‘be thought very knowledgeable when they are for...
Words: 479 - Pages: 2
...D-Hall options Editorial As any student who has been on a non D-hall meal plan knows, it’s difficult to convince yourself to eat there when you have to use flex bucks or real money. D-hall costs over 7$ for students without a meal plan. That cost is the same regardless of how much you intend to eat, a detail that can be very frustrating. 7$ may not seem like very much, but when you are operating on a fixed income like many college students are, it becomes rather expensive to eat at D-hall. When offered the choice of having an arguably lesser quality biscuit and eggs with bacon in D-hall for 7$ or a quick to-go version of the same thing in Valhalla for less than 3$ it’s pretty obvious which one students will chose. Yes D-hall has a variety of other foods, such as cereal and juice and the occasional breakfast sausage in the morning, but half of those feel like they have better versions for cheaper in Valhalla (which is saying something considering the price of “groceries” in Valhalla). For an all you can eat dinner buffet, 7$ doesn’t sound like too bad a price considering the quantity of food you can consume especially after a hard day of class and work. The primary issue I have with D-hall is rarely do I feel like I’m eating enough to warrant paying my way into D-hall unless that multiple plate dinner is the intended case. It feels like a waste almost when you just want a to-go box with some sandwiches or a salad and it costs the same as that all you can eat buffet. People...
Words: 515 - Pages: 3
