Is the Death Penalty Ethical

In: Social Issues

Submitted By trwilliams
Words 1696
Pages 7
Death Penalty- death as punishment for a crime also called capital punishment; putting a condemned person to death

Britain influenced America's use of the death penalty more than any other country. When European settlers came to the new world, they brought the practice of capital punishment. The first recorded execution in the new colonies was that of Captain George Kendall in the Jamestown colony of Virginia in 1608. Kendall was executed for being a spy for Spain. In 1612, Virginia Governor Sir Thomas Dale enacted the Divine, Moral and Martial Laws, which provided the death penalty for even minor offenses such as stealing grapes, killing chickens, and trading with Indians. Laws regarding the death penalty varied from colony to colony. The Massachusetts Bay Colony held its first execution in 1630, even though the Capital Laws of New England did not go into effect until years later. The New York Colony instituted the Duke's Laws of 1665. Under these laws, offenses such as striking one's mother or father, or denying the "true God," were punishable by death. (Randa, 1997)
The 1960s brought challenges to the fundamental legality of the death penalty. Before then, the Fifth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments were interpreted as permitting the death penalty. However, in the early 1960s, it was suggested that the death penalty was a "cruel and unusual" punishment, and therefore unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment. In 1958, the Supreme Court had decided in
Trop v. Dulles (356 U.S. 86), that the Eighth Amendment contained an "evolving

standard of decency that marked the progress of a maturing society." Although Trop was not a death penalty case, abolitionists applied the Court's logic to executions and maintained that the United States had, in fact, progressed to a point that its "standard of decency" should no longer tolerate the death penalty. (Bohm,…...

Similar Documents

Death Penalty

... rational thinking. This continues to be a controversial issue which will be argues for many more years. What I might think is right and ethical may not sit right with others. People will continue to argue what they think is right because we all have different opinions and emotions about certain issues. Reference Gow, H. (1996). Not applying the death penalty is cruel, immoral and unjust. Human Events, 52(45), 22. Harrison, K., & Melville, C. (2007). The Death Penalty by Lethal Injection and Hill v McDonough: Is the USA Starting to See Sense?. Journal Of Criminal Law, 71(2), 167-180. (2012, September 12). State Death Penalty Laws. Retrieved from

Words: 1373 - Pages: 6

Death Penalty

...The death penalty is capital punishment for crimes committed and the legal process of putting someone to death. The death penalty is not determined at a federal level. The death penalty is decided by each state. Currently 34 states in the United States participate in the death penalty. Some people feel the state has no right to take someone’s life. The right to reject life incarceration and choose death should be respected, but changes nothing for people who oppose the death at the hands of the state. Family and friends of murder victims are further victimized by state killings. Family of victims repeatedly stated they wanted the murderer to die. One of the main reasons in addition to justice was they wanted all the publicity to be over. If it was not for the sensationalism surrounding an execution, the media coverage would not have happened in the first place. Killers would be quietly and safely put away for life with absolutely no possibility for parole. The death penalty is frequently used for political advancement. During his presidential gain, President Clinton hurried home for the Arkansas execution of Rickey Ray Rector, a mentally retarded, indigent black man (Dickson, 2010) Clinton did not want to take the risk of being seen by the public as " soft on crime." Political Analysts are certain that when the death penalty develops an issue in a campaign, the candidate favoring capital punishment almost inevitably will benefit. Capital punishment discriminates against the...

Words: 481 - Pages: 2

Death Penalty

...Name 12/10/12 English Research Paper Section 1 “Should The Death Penalty Be Legalized?” I. Although the death penalty is in decline, the “Golden Age’ of capital punishment in the United States peaked in the year 1999, where there were a total of ninety eight executions (“The Tide Shifts Against the Death Penalty” 1). This was the highest number seen since 1976. Advocates of the death penalty feel that the fear of death will make criminals think twice before committing a crime. However, opponents of the death penalty feel that innocent people are too often sentenced to death for crimes they did not commit. As to any argument, there are pros and cons of the death penalty. Is the death penalty just a punishment? Do certain crimes cry out for the death penalty? Does it violate the United States Constitution? Does it deter crimes? As of January 1, 2008, the number of people on death row in the United States since it originated is 3,263 (“The Death Penalty in the U.S. 1976-2008” 1). II. The most common means of executing prisoners on death row is by lethal injection. Some claim that this violates the Eighth Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment (“The Tide Shifts Against the Death Penalty” 1). There are other methods of execution in the United States, such as firing squad and electrocution. There are thirty seven states in the U.S that use the death penalty (“Death Penalty...

Words: 1575 - Pages: 7

Death Penalty

...The Death Penalty and its Ethical Permissibility Palestine Fox Kaplan University Abstract The death penalty has been used for centuries to punish criminals for heinous crimes, in spite of the fact that arguments concerning the death penalty, its concepts of retribution, deterrence and just punishments have been disagreed upon. The question at hand is whether or not the death penalty is permissible and if so under what circumstances, which has long been a heated debate for centuries. The ethical issues surrounding the death penalty include the morality of this form of punishment and whether or not it is morally right to deprive a human being of life. This paper will discuss the background of the death penalty, its permissibility under the law and how the death penalty would be viewed by the ethical philosophies and various religions. The Death Penalty and its Permissibility Introduction of the Death Penalty The death penalty or capital punishment is the practice of executing someone as a form of punishment for a heinous or specific crime following a proper legal trial. The death penalty is usually a punishment sentenced for serious types of murders, in some countries treason, types of fraud, adultery and rape, which are capital crimes (Capital Punishment, 2013). The death penalty was introduced as early as the Eighteenth Century B.C. in the Code of King Hammaurabi of Babylon, who codified the death penalty for 25 different crimes. In the Seventh Century B.C...

Words: 4062 - Pages: 17

Is the Death Penalty Ethical

...Is the Death Penalty Ethical?             It is clear in our society that violent crimes, such as murder, should carry some sort of stiffer punishment than that of other, lesser crimes.  What is not clear is what that punishment should be.  One punishment that is a constant source of debate is the death penalty.  In this paper, I will examine whether the death penalty is or is not ethical.  Both sides of the issue will be explained, through examination of various aspects of it, which include religious and financial considerations, whether the death penalty is a deterrent or not, and whether or not it can be regarded as justice.  I submit that the death penalty is an ethical and equitable punishment for murderers, and should be used throughout our country.              The seemingly greatest amount of debate comes from a religious standpoint.  Depending on whose interpretation one hears, the Bible is for or against capital punishment.  Verses from The Bible are used by both sides of the argument to support their own beliefs.  The United States is made up of numerous different religious cultures.  A sample of a few official policies from some denominations’ web sites shows an almost fifty-fifty split for and against.  For example, the Assemblies of God (USA) do not take a stance for or against the death penalty.  The same is true for the Church of Christ of Latter-day Saints, who say that it should be left to “…the prescribed processes of civil law.”(November 28, 2011...

Words: 2461 - Pages: 10

Death Penalty

...Death penalty, defined one way, it is the process of enacting justice to someone who took away another person’s life; defined in another way, it is a glorified form of murder. Is it essential to run execution? This has been a controversial issue for a long time, yet no one has come up with an exact answer. Yes, indeed, those people should pay for what they have done; and yes, those people deserve death for killing another person. But is death penalty ethical? Although execution is legal by law in certain areas, there is no doubt at all that executing is murdering as well. Would there not be a better way for punishment rather than death penalty? The answer is yes. In Canada, for example, life imprisonment has been used to replace capital punishment since 1976. Because Canada is a country which takes protection of human rights seriously, it realized that execution is inhumane and immoral. It does not mean we have to kill a person to make him pay for his crime. In addition, the prisoner should have spent the rest of his life revising what he has done wrong. Shooting him to death only frees him from taking responsibility. This does not leave any time for him to think about why he should be regretful. Those countries which execute death penalty also have to consider one thing: if the person being executed is the only one who raises his or her family, then how were rests of the family members supposed to live on their own? This problem would not really matter to people...

Words: 497 - Pages: 2

Ethical Debate on the Death Penalty

...As human beings, we are often faced with ethical dilemmas that we consider wrong according to our own code of ethics. No one person is right or wrong for having an opinion. Our own personal code of ethics helps us shape the people we are today and defines our personality. From the time we are able to comprehend what death and murder was, we knew and understood that it was morally wrong and was stated so in the Bible. We ask ourselves this question: “Do any of us have the right to determine who gets the death penalty?” Many are against the death penalty, some are for it, it all depends what side fits their code of personal ethics. Personally, I am against it. The Bible states that “Thou shall not kill,” and I take that literally, no matter what the situation or circumstance. As early as 1700 BC was the first known death penalty laws. The Code of Hammurabi was a legal document from ancient Babylonia. Twenty-five crimes were punishable by death. Some of these crimes included adultery and helping slaves escape. Murder was not considered a punishable crime at this point. 1608 was when murder became a serious enough crime to get the death penalty. The Founding Fathers had included provisions to the Constitution including the Fifth and the Eighth Amendment, and the basic principles of government executions remained allowable under each separate state and federal governments. Thomas Jefferson attempted to change Virginia’s death penalty laws so that murder and...

Words: 1266 - Pages: 6

Death Penalty

...Death Penalty 1 The Death Penalty in the United States Rebecca Bartley ENC3211-Report Writing Professor Johnson June 8, 2013 Death Penalty 2 Abstract Death penalty has had so many changes in the last 300 years many states still use the death penalty. There are many states that are abolishing it for any number of different reasons. Many now believe the death penalty is unconstitutional and also cruel and unusual punishment and it should no longer be used. Many believe life in prison is a better remedy than putting someone to death. Keywords: Death Penalty Death Penalty 3 The Death Penalty in the United States: How it has changed over years. The death penalty policies and ideas have changed from state to state over the last ten (10) years. Each state is now making the chose on whether to have or use the death penalty, or to abolish it for any number of reasons. There are a couple of reasons that the death penalty is being abolished: (1) the first would be that many states are starting to believe that it’s unconstitutional; and (2) the death penalty is being used less and less, there are more inmates who are sitting on death row for many years. “New Mexico repeated the death penalty in 2009, and replacing it with a sentence of life without the possibility of parole” (NM repeal, 2012).”With this new Mexico was the last state to implement true life without parole, and in the last five (5) years, five (5) states have repealed...

Words: 3186 - Pages: 13

Death Penalty

...Death Penalty: Terminating the Death Penalty in the United States The Unites States of America is one of the few remaining countries to keep intact the most severe of criminal sanctions, the death penalty, even though it has not been proven to be effective, but rather the opposite. It is a truism. Their are many and more reasons to why this drastic criminal sanction should be abolished. Under definition of law, execution is premeditated murder in the first degree. The death penalty is unjust and we, the people, should have moved past our ancestors barbaric ways. To create a peaceful and just world even for the worst that humanity may offer. This criminal sanction also has a cost, in more ways then one. It is very expensive to preform physically but also has the ability to take a mental toll to those involved, it’s a costly situation. The worst of situations is those convicted and put of death row, only later to be found innocent of all charges. The lucky ones proved innocent before their scheduled execution but some are not half as lucky until they have reached their after life. The overall cost of executions have different ways to take a toll on someone. It’s the financial cost of carrying out the death penalty. The cost of an execution is much higher then the cost of life in prison. If sentenced to death, their are many financial costs that need be taken care of such as the lawyers, the medications for the actual execution, the trials to be tried, etc. Since 1978...

Words: 1835 - Pages: 8

Death Penalty

...Q: Some critics of the death penalty maintain the death penalty is wrong because it is irrevocable. What reply does Reiman offer to this position? A: Reiman’s reply to the viewpoint of the death penalty being irrevocable is such that “it’s not that the death penalty is irrevocable and other punishments are revocable; rather, all punishments are irrevocable though the death penalty is relatively more irrevocable than the rest” (Hinman, 2006, p. 153). In other words, Reiman feels that the death penalty being wrong just because it is irrevocable is too much of a blanket statement that discounts other options, such as the case of prisoners who are put to death but then found innocent and in matters of someone living life in prison then being found innocent. In the case of the former and the latter, money can be given to the ex-prisoner found innocent and that their name can be cleared. With that being said, someone put to death and then being found innocent and an innocent person being set free after a long incarceration are not irrevocable things—time has passed and cannot be returned. Reiman’s reply to these stances is that these situations are very few and far between. In contrast, Reiman explains that “we accept the death of innocents elsewhere...and it is not plausible to think that the execution of a small number of innocent persons is so terrible...especially when every effort is made to make sure that does not occur” (Hinman, p. 153). Therefore, Reiman agrees that the......

Words: 286 - Pages: 2

Death Penalty

...The Death Penalty The Death Penalty can be argued for both right and wrong. Many people think it is right for the type of act the person has committed. Many people think it is wrong because the person who is being punished can learn from their mistakes. The death penalty can go either way. One reason the death penalty is good is the person who committed the crime gets what they deserve. If a person murders an innocent person than they should receive the same amount of punishment as he did to the innocent person. There is no reason why the murderer should get the same amount of punishisment than the innocent person got. Another reason the Death Penalty Is good is because it stops people from making a wrong choice. If someone does something to have them sentenced to the Death Penalty that means they have not only affected themselves but have affected other people as well as their families. It’s not right to have this in a society. The Death Penalty is also a bad choice. People can learn from their mistakes. It may not be the greatest idea to take someone else’s life for punishment. Its to harsh of a punishment they would have to learn. The death penalty can have a different solution. Instead of taking someone elses life you can sentence them to life imprisonment. It would be easier for the person to learn there mistakes and never do it again. You would have to have much trust in that person. Killing another person is never a good solution. The death......

Words: 294 - Pages: 2

Death Penalty

...Dylan Coday Mr. Johnson English 102, 10:00 2 Febuary 2015 Request for Your Final Meal? There are two industrial countries that still have the death penalty in effect-the United States and Japan. Oxford Dictionary defines the death penalty as “The punishment of execution, administered to someone legally convicted of a capital crime”. These countries remain in the minority nations in the world that still promote the death penalty for certain crimes. Numerous citizens see the penalty as barbaric and against American values, but the death penalty has been around for some time. There is not a guarantee the criminals that are being put to death were not innocent from the beginning. Capital punishment was brought to these shores by the earliest colonial governments in the seventeenth century. The criminal law developed here was little more than a series of variations, colony by colony, on the law of England, the mother country. All the colonies authorized public executions by hanging as a mandatory punishment for various crimes. Reasons we should eliminate the death penalty is that utilizing the death penalty will cost the tax payers 2-5 times more capital versus keeping the prisoner in jail for their life. The reason of this is that there will be an “endless number of appeals, and additional required procedures” (Balanced Politics). The death penalty violates the “Cruel and unusual” clause in the Bill of Rights. The Bill or Rights is the foundation this country was built...

Words: 929 - Pages: 4

Death Penalty

...Maira De Leon Professor Bell ENG 1102 July 27th, 2015 Right Denied: The Effects Being Ignored Death by lethal injection, death by electrocution, or any form of the death penalty given that people find to be fit for capital crimes is not a human’s right. We as humans do not have the right to end someone’s life based on the fact that they committed a crime. We have to take into accountability the countless amounts of lives that are impacted by this. Even on the international level, there are hundreds of countries who have abolished the death penalty completely. There is more to this than others think, yet they do not take the time to research or study the adverse effects of what this kind of punishment can cause. The death penalty violates the human right to life and causes a ripple effect that destroys the lives of the families of the individuals being executed. Death penalty supporters can be very profound with their opinions on what they believe is an excellent crime deterrent. In an article written for the Journal of Criminal Justice between May and June 2009, one of the authors by the name Shanhe Jiang stated, “Supporters of the death penalty argue that sentencing criminals to death deters others from committing a similar crime in the future.” He states that future crimes could indeed be deterred because of the continued support for the death penalty. In many cases, people see the death penalty as a form to punish those who commit murder, mass murder, rape and...

Words: 2025 - Pages: 9

Death Penalty

...Discuss whether the death penalty in serves a relevant purpose in criminal proceedings in Malaysia. Over the centuries, laws and public attitudes relating to torture have evolved. It is no longer permissible to use thumbscrews or the rack as legally sanctioned means of interrogation and punishment. Attitudes toward the death penalty are also changing, and as more and more countries abolish capital punishment, the guillotine, the garrotte and the noose are being relegated to museums, alongside medieval instruments of torture. As we know, the death penalty is the sentence of death upon a person by the state as a punishment for a crime. Crimes that can result in a death penalty are known as capital crimes or capital offences. The term capital originates from the Latin capitalis, literally “regarding the head”. Hence a capital crime was originally one punished by the severing the head from the body. Capital punishment in Malaysia applies to murder, drug trafficking, treason, and waging war against Yang di-Pertuan Agong (the King). Recently, the law has been extended to include acts of terrorism. Any terrorists, and anyone who aids terrorists, financially or otherwise, are liable to face the death penalty. Only High Courts have the jurisdiction to sentence someone to death. Juvenile cases involving the death penalty are heard in High Courts instead of the juvenile court where other juvenile cases are heard. Appeals to the Court of Appeal and the Federal Court are automatic. The...

Words: 1822 - Pages: 8

Is the Death Penalty Ethical

... Can a defendant get death for a felony in which s/he was not responsible for the murder? Yes Number of Innocent Persons Freed From Death Row 2 Number of Clemencies Granted 0 Region South Method Choice of Injection or Electrocution How is the Sentence Determined? Jury Location of Death Row(s) Ridgville (Women: Columbia) Clemency Process Governor has sole authority to grant clemency South Carolina executed a James Terry Roach on January 10, 1996 he was twenty five and had evidence of mental retardation, a juvenile at the time of crime. A lot of Americans believe that juvenile should not be on death row. They believe that they can be rehabilitated. Here are crimes that can give you the death penalty. Murder with 1 of 12 aggravating circumstances; criminal sexual conduct with a minor with 1 of 9 aggravators. Revision: Added as a capital offense second and sequent offense first degree criminal sexual conduct with a minor who is less than 11 years of age. Lawmakers also added as an aggravating factor murder committed by a person deemed a sexually violent predator under South Carolina law. Both changes were effective 7/01/2006. Another revision was added as an aggravating circumstance murder committed while in the commission of first degree arson. A Mark Lipsky wrote the New York Times about the death penalty here is what he had to say. To the Editor: Mark Lipsky (letter, Feb. 6) claims the death penalty is "not only ethical but essential." Ethical?......

Words: 1696 - Pages: 7