Is the Death Penalty Justified?

In: Philosophy and Psychology

Submitted By ntcarrsmalls
Words 2500
Pages 10
Is The Death Penalty Justified?
Narisha T. Carr-Smalls
PHI200: Mind and Machine
Instructor: Elliott Crozat
July 4, 2012

Is The Death Penalty Justified?
How would we define Capital punishment? It is the death penalty. “Capital punishment is the execution of a person by the state as punishment for a crime. The word ‘capital’ comes from the Latin word ‘capitalis,’ which means ‘regarding the head.’ At one point and time capital crimes where punished by severing the head. Crimes that can result in the death penalty are known as capital crimes or capital offenses. Capital punishment has been used in societies throughout history as a way to punish crime and suppress political dissent. In most places that practice capital punishment today, the death penalty is reserved as punishment for premeditated murder, espionage, treason, or as part of military justice. In some countries sexual crimes, such as rape, adultery and sodomy, carry the death penalty, as do religious crimes such as apostasy (the formal renunciation of the State religion). In many retentions countries (Countries that use the death penalty), drug trafficking is also a capital offense. In China human trafficking and serious cases of corruption are also punished by the death penalty (Debatepedia, 2011).” Capital punishment was used throughout history and still used today for a variety of offenses. The death penalty was even utilized biblically for crimes such as murder, kidnapping, and even witchcraft. The death penalty has been debated since its invention. With sides heatedly debating their opinions, some believing that it is justified, while others believe that innocent people may be getting executed. The death penalty is one of the most debated issues in the history of the Criminal Justice System. The British settlers brought practices of capital punishment with them to the new world.…...

Similar Documents

Death Penalty

...The death penalty is capital punishment for crimes committed and the legal process of putting someone to death. The death penalty is not determined at a federal level. The death penalty is decided by each state. Currently 34 states in the United States participate in the death penalty. Some people feel the state has no right to take someone’s life. The right to reject life incarceration and choose death should be respected, but changes nothing for people who oppose the death at the hands of the state. Family and friends of murder victims are further victimized by state killings. Family of victims repeatedly stated they wanted the murderer to die. One of the main reasons in addition to justice was they wanted all the publicity to be over. If it was not for the sensationalism surrounding an execution, the media coverage would not have happened in the first place. Killers would be quietly and safely put away for life with absolutely no possibility for parole. The death penalty is frequently used for political advancement. During his presidential gain, President Clinton hurried home for the Arkansas execution of Rickey Ray Rector, a mentally retarded, indigent black man (Dickson, 2010) Clinton did not want to take the risk of being seen by the public as " soft on crime." Political Analysts are certain that when the death penalty develops an issue in a campaign, the candidate favoring capital punishment almost inevitably will benefit. Capital punishment discriminates against the...

Words: 481 - Pages: 2

Death Penalty

...Name 12/10/12 English Research Paper Section 1 “Should The Death Penalty Be Legalized?” I. Although the death penalty is in decline, the “Golden Age’ of capital punishment in the United States peaked in the year 1999, where there were a total of ninety eight executions (“The Tide Shifts Against the Death Penalty” 1). This was the highest number seen since 1976. Advocates of the death penalty feel that the fear of death will make criminals think twice before committing a crime. However, opponents of the death penalty feel that innocent people are too often sentenced to death for crimes they did not commit. As to any argument, there are pros and cons of the death penalty. Is the death penalty just a punishment? Do certain crimes cry out for the death penalty? Does it violate the United States Constitution? Does it deter crimes? As of January 1, 2008, the number of people on death row in the United States since it originated is 3,263 (“The Death Penalty in the U.S. 1976-2008” 1). II. The most common means of executing prisoners on death row is by lethal injection. Some claim that this violates the Eighth Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment (“The Tide Shifts Against the Death Penalty” 1). There are other methods of execution in the United States, such as firing squad and electrocution. There are thirty seven states in the U.S that use the death penalty (“Death Penalty...

Words: 1575 - Pages: 7

Death Penalty

... penalty legally and morally justified and permissible? 2. Is the cost of the death penalty financially comparable to a sentence of life in prison? 3. Is the death penalty effective in deterring individuals from committing capital crimes? The United States Constitution permits the death penalty in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, in the Fifth Amendment it states that “No person shall be held to answer for a capital crime or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand jury” and in the Fourteenth Amendment further states that “No person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law”. These two amendments in the Constitution speak on the possibility of using capital punishment by the federal or state governments. Utilizing constitutional power to impose the death penalty is often asserted as having little moral justification for the imposition of the death penalty by some in society even when the proper procedures have been followed under the legal requirement of due process. I do not agree with this conclusion. There is moral justification for the use of the death penalty, its use can be justified by the principle of the punishment of the crime being proportionate to the severity of the crime, and the criminal tried by a group of his or her peers and was provided the legal requirement of due process before being sentenced to death. Our justice system is grounded in this concept. The legal system has...

Words: 4062 - Pages: 17

Death Penalty

...Capital Punishment Capital punishment has been the center of much controversy dating back to its origins. Although the roots of capital punishment can be traced as far back as the life of Christ, arguments over its effectiveness and morality continue in the midst of its existence today. There are many people who have come up with reasonable arguments for both sides of the issue. Most people who believe that the death penalty is a fair punishment use the argument, "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, an arm for an arm, a life for a life." Otherwise known as Hamarabi’s Code. While most people who are in opposition use the argument that capital punishment is a cruel and unusual punishment which violates the eighth amendment to the United States Constitution. In the times surrounding the origins of capital punishment, it was used for a wide variety of crimes. Capital punishment can also be found in the Bible. The Bible prescribed the death penalty for crimes such as murder, kidnapping and witchcraft. By 1500 AD, in England, only major felonies carried the death penalty: treason, murder, larceny, burglary, rape, and arson. (Lexicon Universal Encyclopedia, 1989) The United States inherited capital punishment from European settlers in the seventeenth century. They promoted the idea that heinous crimes deserved severe punishment. And this is what brought capital punishment to its present standing. In the United States justice system a proportionate punishment is achieved, in...

Words: 1495 - Pages: 6

Death Penalty

...Death Penalty 1 The Death Penalty in the United States Rebecca Bartley ENC3211-Report Writing Professor Johnson June 8, 2013 Death Penalty 2 Abstract Death penalty has had so many changes in the last 300 years many states still use the death penalty. There are many states that are abolishing it for any number of different reasons. Many now believe the death penalty is unconstitutional and also cruel and unusual punishment and it should no longer be used. Many believe life in prison is a better remedy than putting someone to death. Keywords: Death Penalty Death Penalty 3 The Death Penalty in the United States: How it has changed over years. The death penalty policies and ideas have changed from state to state over the last ten (10) years. Each state is now making the chose on whether to have or use the death penalty, or to abolish it for any number of reasons. There are a couple of reasons that the death penalty is being abolished: (1) the first would be that many states are starting to believe that it’s unconstitutional; and (2) the death penalty is being used less and less, there are more inmates who are sitting on death row for many years. “New Mexico repeated the death penalty in 2009, and replacing it with a sentence of life without the possibility of parole” (NM repeal, 2012).”With this new Mexico was the last state to implement true life without parole, and in the last five (5) years, five (5) states have repealed...

Words: 3186 - Pages: 13

Death Penalty

...Death Penalty: Terminating the Death Penalty in the United States The Unites States of America is one of the few remaining countries to keep intact the most severe of criminal sanctions, the death penalty, even though it has not been proven to be effective, but rather the opposite. It is a truism. Their are many and more reasons to why this drastic criminal sanction should be abolished. Under definition of law, execution is premeditated murder in the first degree. The death penalty is unjust and we, the people, should have moved past our ancestors barbaric ways. To create a peaceful and just world even for the worst that humanity may offer. This criminal sanction also has a cost, in more ways then one. It is very expensive to preform physically but also has the ability to take a mental toll to those involved, it’s a costly situation. The worst of situations is those convicted and put of death row, only later to be found innocent of all charges. The lucky ones proved innocent before their scheduled execution but some are not half as lucky until they have reached their after life. The overall cost of executions have different ways to take a toll on someone. It’s the financial cost of carrying out the death penalty. The cost of an execution is much higher then the cost of life in prison. If sentenced to death, their are many financial costs that need be taken care of such as the lawyers, the medications for the actual execution, the trials to be tried, etc. Since 1978...

Words: 1835 - Pages: 8

Is Death Penalty Justified?

...Sufian Tanveer Death Penalty The death penalty has been around since the beginning of crime and has been reserved for the worst of crimes. Many people believe it’s justified, reasoning that the punishment should fit the crime. However, a large demographic believes it violates the rights of man and is inhumane. The death penalty is a primitive idea and is reminiscent of the uncivilized ideas of the dark ages and is unfitting in the modern world. It has been abolished in 32 states and is likely to rise. It’s morally wrong and violates practically every religion. The premise behind the death penalty is murder for murder. The death penalty should be abolished because 1) it’s a waste of taxpayer funds, 2) innocent people can be wrongly sentenced, 3) and life without parole is more beneficial. Enacting the death penalty actually costs more than having an inmate spend the rest of their life in jail without parole. It’s better to put an existing death row inmate in life without parole because less money is spent and it does not stir up as much commotion on whether it’s lawful or not. The reason why the death penalty costs more than housing an inmate for life is because the appeals. A candidate can appeal on almost any grounds because of how sensitive the death penalty is. If a candidate was only allowed one appeal it would remedy this issue. Millions of dollars is spent on criminals deciding on whether they should live or not. Any money should not be put towards the benefit...

Words: 707 - Pages: 3

Death Penalty

...Q: Some critics of the death penalty maintain the death penalty is wrong because it is irrevocable. What reply does Reiman offer to this position? A: Reiman’s reply to the viewpoint of the death penalty being irrevocable is such that “it’s not that the death penalty is irrevocable and other punishments are revocable; rather, all punishments are irrevocable though the death penalty is relatively more irrevocable than the rest” (Hinman, 2006, p. 153). In other words, Reiman feels that the death penalty being wrong just because it is irrevocable is too much of a blanket statement that discounts other options, such as the case of prisoners who are put to death but then found innocent and in matters of someone living life in prison then being found innocent. In the case of the former and the latter, money can be given to the ex-prisoner found innocent and that their name can be cleared. With that being said, someone put to death and then being found innocent and an innocent person being set free after a long incarceration are not irrevocable things—time has passed and cannot be returned. Reiman’s reply to these stances is that these situations are very few and far between. In contrast, Reiman explains that “we accept the death of innocents elsewhere...and it is not plausible to think that the execution of a small number of innocent persons is so terrible...especially when every effort is made to make sure that does not occur” (Hinman, p. 153). Therefore, Reiman agrees that the......

Words: 286 - Pages: 2

Death Penalty

...Hello everyone, this is Estelle Vogel death penalty expert and I would just like to say, Thank you Governor for giving me the opportunity to speak on the death penalty/ controlling crime. I would like to begin my analysis of whether to abolish the death penalty in the state Ellieland by giving my opinion of effectiveness. The definition of effective according to Webster’s Dictionary is “Producing a result that is wanted: having an intended effect.” Now by knowing this definition, the major question is, is the death penalty effective? Does the death penalty produce the desired result that publics want? The desired result is for Capital Crimes to be reduced and for tax dollars to be used correctly. I believe that having a death penalty is place is effective on these terms and without it we will not get the ‘desired’ results. The death penalty keeps society safe, deters other criminals, and it is more cost effective than life in prison. The moral response for all this, is we should protect our law abiding citizens rather than protect our violent, capital crime, offenders. The hardline has to be drawn somewhere and the death penalty is this hardline for effective crime control. Although Mr. Bradley Wilson makes sense of some of his view points, like “Mercy is morally valuable trait.” His views complicate the matter rather than simplify the case. The topic of mercy he uses throughout his five points is too abstract and difficult to debate. For example, maybe it is more...

Words: 1185 - Pages: 5

Death Penalty

...The Death Penalty The Death Penalty can be argued for both right and wrong. Many people think it is right for the type of act the person has committed. Many people think it is wrong because the person who is being punished can learn from their mistakes. The death penalty can go either way. One reason the death penalty is good is the person who committed the crime gets what they deserve. If a person murders an innocent person than they should receive the same amount of punishment as he did to the innocent person. There is no reason why the murderer should get the same amount of punishisment than the innocent person got. Another reason the Death Penalty Is good is because it stops people from making a wrong choice. If someone does something to have them sentenced to the Death Penalty that means they have not only affected themselves but have affected other people as well as their families. It’s not right to have this in a society. The Death Penalty is also a bad choice. People can learn from their mistakes. It may not be the greatest idea to take someone else’s life for punishment. Its to harsh of a punishment they would have to learn. The death penalty can have a different solution. Instead of taking someone elses life you can sentence them to life imprisonment. It would be easier for the person to learn there mistakes and never do it again. You would have to have much trust in that person. Killing another person is never a good solution. The death......

Words: 294 - Pages: 2

Death Penalty

...Dylan Coday Mr. Johnson English 102, 10:00 2 Febuary 2015 Request for Your Final Meal? There are two industrial countries that still have the death penalty in effect-the United States and Japan. Oxford Dictionary defines the death penalty as “The punishment of execution, administered to someone legally convicted of a capital crime”. These countries remain in the minority nations in the world that still promote the death penalty for certain crimes. Numerous citizens see the penalty as barbaric and against American values, but the death penalty has been around for some time. There is not a guarantee the criminals that are being put to death were not innocent from the beginning. Capital punishment was brought to these shores by the earliest colonial governments in the seventeenth century. The criminal law developed here was little more than a series of variations, colony by colony, on the law of England, the mother country. All the colonies authorized public executions by hanging as a mandatory punishment for various crimes. Reasons we should eliminate the death penalty is that utilizing the death penalty will cost the tax payers 2-5 times more capital versus keeping the prisoner in jail for their life. The reason of this is that there will be an “endless number of appeals, and additional required procedures” (Balanced Politics). The death penalty violates the “Cruel and unusual” clause in the Bill of Rights. The Bill or Rights is the foundation this country was built...

Words: 929 - Pages: 4

Death Penalty?

...Matt Russo Criminology Paper The Death Penalty Throughout history mankind has had a way to deal with crimes. The idea of punishment and retribution has been around since the first set of written laws, the code of Hammurabi. Since then citizens worldwide have committed crimes and have paid for their actions, whether it be an eye for an eye, or paying a one hundred dollar ticket, punishment is still relevant today. In our world today there is a massive scale on which crime can be committed and the worst of the worst can be put to death. For centuries humans have killed humans when they fell justified. Should we have that power, should we be able to take the lives of others? The death penalty might be the most controversial penalty in existence. The penalty of death was used for over twenty five different offenses for the code of Hammurabi, ancient Greece and Rome also killed civilians for crime. Every civilization in history with a set of laws has been using the death penalty, and there are only a few differences today. Instead of crucifixion, drowning, burning or burying someone alive we think that we kill in a more humane way. In the last fifty years we’ve been avoiding using the electric chair, hangings and firing squads. Now we use the lethal injection, a mix of toxic chemicals injected into the bloodstream to kill the person from the inside out. Now this strikes a debate with most people should we do it? Are we doing it the right way? And who deserves it...

Words: 2445 - Pages: 10

Death Penalty

...Maira De Leon Professor Bell ENG 1102 July 27th, 2015 Right Denied: The Effects Being Ignored Death by lethal injection, death by electrocution, or any form of the death penalty given that people find to be fit for capital crimes is not a human’s right. We as humans do not have the right to end someone’s life based on the fact that they committed a crime. We have to take into accountability the countless amounts of lives that are impacted by this. Even on the international level, there are hundreds of countries who have abolished the death penalty completely. There is more to this than others think, yet they do not take the time to research or study the adverse effects of what this kind of punishment can cause. The death penalty violates the human right to life and causes a ripple effect that destroys the lives of the families of the individuals being executed. Death penalty supporters can be very profound with their opinions on what they believe is an excellent crime deterrent. In an article written for the Journal of Criminal Justice between May and June 2009, one of the authors by the name Shanhe Jiang stated, “Supporters of the death penalty argue that sentencing criminals to death deters others from committing a similar crime in the future.” He states that future crimes could indeed be deterred because of the continued support for the death penalty. In many cases, people see the death penalty as a form to punish those who commit murder, mass murder, rape and...

Words: 2025 - Pages: 9

Death Penalty

... reported and details of those who have been or will be executed are not made public. Under the Malaysian law and practices arrested persons have no immediate access to lawyers, no immediate right to a phone call and no right to full pre-trial disclosure. In 2006, one execution took place in Malaysia. Before that, last execution was carried out on December 27, 2002, when three men were hanged at the Kajang prison. At least one execution was carried out in 2008. On December 18, 2008, and December 21st, 2010, Malaysia voted against the Resolution on a Moratorium on the Use of the Death Penalty at the UN General Assembly. Cutting through to the heart of the matter, the death penalty is simply society's way of concluding that a particular individual deserves to die because of what was done by that person. The punishment is justified by the nature of crime committed. If the condemned person suffers as a consequence of the penalty setting aside the method of application that is not only acceptable but desirable. Punishment and/or retribution are historically one legitimate purpose of the criminal sanction. Insofar as practical consequences are concerned, thoughtful proponents of the death penalty do not justify their belief on any notions of general deterrence. This is an unproven assertion and is basically irrelevant to the central rationale. It may be concluded, however, that the individual executed will be prevented (i.e. deterred) from committing any further homicidal acts or......

Words: 1822 - Pages: 8

Is the Death Penalty Justified?

...Is The Death Penalty Justified? Narisha T. Carr-Smalls PHI200: Mind and Machine Instructor: Elliott Crozat July 4, 2012 Is The Death Penalty Justified? How would we define Capital punishment? It is the death penalty. “Capital punishment is the execution of a person by the state as punishment for a crime. The word ‘capital’ comes from the Latin word ‘capitalis,’ which means ‘regarding the head.’ At one point and time capital crimes where punished by severing the head. Crimes that can result in the death penalty are known as capital crimes or capital offenses. Capital punishment has been used in societies throughout history as a way to punish crime and suppress political dissent. In most places that practice capital punishment today, the death penalty is reserved as punishment for premeditated murder, espionage, treason, or as part of military justice. In some countries sexual crimes, such as rape, adultery and sodomy, carry the death penalty, as do religious crimes such as apostasy (the formal renunciation of the State religion). In many retentions countries (Countries that use the death penalty), drug trafficking is also a capital offense. In China human trafficking and serious cases of corruption are also punished by the death penalty (Debatepedia, 2011).” Capital punishment was used throughout history and still used today for a variety of offenses. The death penalty was even utilized biblically for crimes such as murder, kidnapping, and even...

Words: 2500 - Pages: 10