Free Essay

Is There Hope in the Proles

In:

Submitted By abasi
Words 1023
Pages 5
“The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance – it is the illusion of knowledge.” -Daniel Boorstin

The 'proles' in 1984 constitute the vast majority (more than 80%) of the populace, but do not have a great part to play in the novel, which is primarily concerned with what goes on within 'The Party'.

The masses, the proletariat (from which 'prole' is obviously derived), are supposed to be the prime beneficiaries of English Socialism. They are, after all, the majority, the working class. However, it is clear that in fact 'Ing Soc' is not for their benefit, and has brought no particular improvements to their lives. Winston muses that in the bad old days of capitalism, the workers were ruthlessly exploited, but this exploitation has not really changed ("Women still did work in the coal mines, as a matter of fact.") Only the precise nature of the authority over them has changed.

Though the proles are the majority, they are unimportant. The Party explicitly teaches that the proles are "natural inferiors who must be kept in subjection, like animals". There is no option of escape, for proles who show signs of too much intelligence are not elevated into the Party, they are simply eliminated. As Pimlott observes: "the relative freedom of working-class people is merely a symptom of the contempt in which they are held". It is quite simply unnecessary to exercise the same level of control over the proletariat that is maintained where Party members are concerned.

It is not only the Party which regards the proles as unimportant: the arch-enemy, Goldstein, dismisses them too, referring to the divisions of High, Middle and Low people, in which the Low are essentially destined to remain powerless. This attitude has much in common with the one Huxley shows in Brave New World—the lower castes are mindless enough to be satisfied with little, and can be relied on not to be troublesome.

Winston Smith recognises that only the proles have the potential for rebellion. Because the masses are relatively free, whereas his own life is rigourously controlled, they could seize the opportunity to rise up and overthrow the oppressive state. The 'swarming disregarded masses' could overwhelm the ruling minority if they acted consciously.

Unfortunately for Winston's hope, it is clear that the proles do not act consciously, at least, not in the sense he desires. The incident which sets him alive with hope turns out to be not the stirring of rebellion against the Party, but merely a frustrated reaction to the short supply of some tawdry saucepans. It appears that the ruling Party's (and Goldstein's) disregard for the proles is based in fact: they are not capable of rebellion, for their thoughts and aspirations are simply on too low a level for them to achieve the kind of goals Winston has in mind.

Orwell displays Winston's hopes for the proles as "a mystical truth and a palpable absurdity". Indeed, it seems to be both a common intellectual conceit, and true, that 'the masses' lack the capacity for inspired rebellion. Although Orwell himself believed in equality, he was obviously aware that most people will settle for what they have.

The proles within Oceania's society are therefore the unimportant majority. They also exist within the novel in order to provide a contrasting background for Winston's life. Their lives are straightforward and ordinary, but they have something Winston does not have. They are typified by the woman who sings a sentimental ditty as she hands out the washing—whom Winston eventually recognises as beautiful. She has not got much, but she is able to be happy, and to sing. Winston's life is so controlled, so spied on, so constricted that he lives in constant and justified paranoia. He cannot sing, because such behaviour would be outside the required parameters, and besides, he does not feel any urge to do so.

Winston recognises that the proles have retained ordinary, decent human emotions—whereas within his own echelon, children are encouraged to disobey and inform against their parents, love and sexual pleasure are being actively discouraged, and simple friendship is impossible because there is no honesty. In the atmosphere of constant fear, Winston's own emotions have become warped. Early in the novel, his reactions to the unspeakably nasty film he watches are callous and inhuman—but a prole woman stands up and shouts her objections. When Winston goes for a walk in the prole district, the inhabitants are sullen and suspicious, but nonetheless, someone takes the trouble to warn him of an incoming missile. A crowd forms round the resulting debris—but Winston's own reaction is to kick away the severed human hand as though it were merely rubbish. He is right to recognise that "the proles had stayed human", while he himself had to re-learn the "primitive emotions" which are natural to human beings.

Of course, the incident straight after the missile—men arguing over the Lottery, which Winston knows is a fake to provide false hope for the gullible—leads him back to disappointment again. Winston is unable to communicate with the proles. Their lives and his are very different, and his is in his way as limited as they are. He attempts to find out about the truth of the past by talking to an old man, but fails to understand what he is being told, because it is not delivered to him in the form he wants to hear. Little clues—like the old man referring to having worn a top hat (officially the 'badge' of the capitalist)—quite escape him. However, the same incident shows the reader that there are recognisable, 'normal' people in this ghastly world.

In essence, the proles provide a background and reference point, emphasising the horrors of IngSoc society, and demonstrating how easily ordinary people can put up with such horrors. Orwell contradicts the rather romantic belief that 'the masses' will liberate themselves by showing that in practice, the masses simply make the best of things—and achieve a reasonable measure of happiness too. They provide a brutal contrast to Winston's own life and circumstances.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Compare and Contrast the Theme of Control in the Handmaids Tale and Nineteen Eighty-Four

...Compare and contrast the theme of control in The Handmaids Tale and Nineteen Eighty-Four Control is a central theme in both dystopian texts and control is present in both novels. Both societies in the novels are heavily controlled and restricted, but the key difference is in the regime used by the respective governments in each text. In The Handmaids Tale the government’s ideologies are theosophical whereas Nineteen Eighty-Four is based on socialism. These ideologies play a key role in the ways that control is presented in each novel. The governments use different forms of control to maintain their regimes and power and these include: indoctrination through control of hierarchy, language and religion. The governments act as totalitarian regimes which constantly monitor the lives of its citizens to keep them under their control. Orwell took inspiration from the plight of Britain during the time the novel was written; 1948. Britain had just come out of a horrifying war that devastated the world - World War Two - and her economy and overseas relations were in deep water. Britain’s economy was at its lowest in decades and very unstable; her Empire was dissolving in to the common wealth and international relations were quickly turning sour. Similarly to The Handmaids Tale, Nineteen Eighty-Four warns against governments’ overwhelming acquirement of power. Orwell himself was well-versed in the world of politics and strategies deployed by governments to gain control. He was also a traditional...

Words: 2713 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Essay On 1984 Freedom

...The war between security and freedom has been fought for centuries; from the times of tyrants to the creation of the United States and the present. The book 1984 is a perfect example of ending the war on security and freedom. Where freedom is the ability to do anything and not have any repercussions. The world of 1984 has neither security nor freedom, only control through power and gives an illusion of both. Freedom can be found in every living class in 1984 including the Inner Party, Outer Party, and to The Proles. Freedom being the subject at hand begins in the Inner Party. The Inner Party conveys the stronger form of freedom in various ways, two of which are the freedom to give anyone suffrage and to have sexual relations with whomever. O’Brien, asks the question, “how does one man assert his power over another” giving him an...

Words: 900 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

American Imperialism In George Orwell's 1984

...tracking him down and keeping him as a thought criminal due to his rampant thoughts and uncontrollable subconscious is his one fear day in and day out. Orwell’s 1984 was published in 1948, this was his idea of how civilization would turn into a dystopia completely under the control of the government where even thoughts are monitored, it was his fear of how WW II would affect the world and communism would take over. Winston becomes paranoid of his subconscious leading to his demise but soon realizes that there is no need because the government has a weak structure that relies heavily on the obedience of its civilians and proles. Winston gets sucked down into the paranoia over his subconscious through the threats made by the government. Big Brother and all of the politicians that make it up instill the fear of thoughts crimes among all of the civilians except for the proles because they are just the working class and thought to be capable of nothing other then living in filth and working for meager pay. The government uses large quantities of propaganda, such as instilling the saying of “WAR IS PEACE / FREEDOM IS SLAVERY / IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH” (Orwell 104) into the head of the civilians. This then leads the people of Oceania to become completely unaware of what the government is doing around them and disassociates almost completely from the subconscious as to alleviate all suspicion that may occur of them thinking things about the ways of the government. Many of the people fall submissive...

Words: 999 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

1984 Argument

...people, but a small glass paperweight from before the rule of the Party remains. The glass paperweight defines Winston Smith's undivided fate throughout the novel. Winston buys the paperweight to reconnect with his past, the paperweight has no value except for its beauty. The beauty of the paperweight symbolizes Winston’s connection to the past and the room above Mr. Charrington's shop. Winston has a tough time recovering his real memories due to how the Party destroys photographs and memories, so when Winston decides to buy the beautiful paperweight from the antique shop in the prole district he tries to reconnect with his past, a time where the Party wasn’t all that powerful. When Winston remarked “If There was Hope, it must Lie in the Proles”(Orwell, 89) he believes that the proles are the least ones corrupted by Big Brother and they have the power to overthrow the Party. He has hope in the proles to change society and bring the past back to when they were not overruled by the Party. The coral paperweight symbolizes a beautiful, safe and secure environment. Winston craves for a safe haven to live in, similar to the glass dome in which the piece of coral is encased. A place where he can be free to love Julia. This is why he chooses the room above the shop. It symbolizes the safe haven of a glass dome paperweight where he can care for and protect Julia and they can be free. Mr. Charrington gladly allows Winston to use the room, his philosophy being that “Privacy, he said, was...

Words: 448 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

1984 Winston Smith A Hero Essay

...Winston gives into Big Brother after he is tortured and becomes content to live in the society he hated so much. He witnesses the weakness within the prole community. Their inability to comprehend the Party’s workings made him understand the importance of liberation but he himself embodies weakness by sabotaging himself and associating with all the wrong people. By simply falling into the arms of Big Brother in the end, Winston showed himself to have the qualities of an anti-hero. Orwell created a world where there is no choice but to conform, and from Winston’s perspective, making his struggle utterly hopeless. The rebellious attitude of Winston is easily defeated and his story becomes insignificant in the overlying battle between the Party and the proles. In the end, Winston's actions do show characteristics of heroism, but it was only able flicker a tiny revolution within himself. His mutiny was unable to extend to the minds of the people around him, thus, failing to spark a revolution. Ultimately, Winston becomes assimilated and Oceania remains...

Words: 711 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

1984 George Orwell Character Analysis

...Orwell’s novel 1984 displays a future dystopian world with a lot of warnings. Some of the warnings begin portrayed in the novel should not be taken for granted. The Novel talks about Party Members of INSCOG and the proles. The two characters presented in the book could be foreshadowing the heroes for our time. Emmanuel Goldstein and Winston Smith are the protagonists in the book. Many elements in the year 2016, are in 1984. Orwell predicted that a powerful few will control an entire population of inferior humans. Today, the powerful few are the businessmen, CEOs, and the wealthy. The media calls the wealthy the 1% and the rest is the 99%. In the real world, the financially unstable have tons of struggles. Some issues are but not limited to overwhelming debt, no good pay, and not having benefits. Poverty and Wealth in today’s world is the exact same concept in 1984. The poor and the rich live in two different universes. In the United States, the top 1% have more wealth than the rest of the country combined (Reich). The wealthy live in housing best suited...

Words: 705 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Comparative Essay

...If Brave New World was Aldous Huxley's technocratic purgatory,  Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-four describes a hell beyond Huxley's worst fears.  Compare and contrast the two novels as visions of a future that has gone dramatically wrong. Brave New World and 1984 were both written by men who had experienced war on the grand scale of the twentieth century. Disillusioned and alarmed by what they saw in society, each author produced a powerful satire and an alarming vision of future possibilities. Although the two books are very different, they address many of the same issues in their contrasting ways. Huxley's novel sets out a world in which society is kept carefully balanced, with the means of reproduction just as closely controlled as the means of production. Human beings and the goods they make are tailored to one another: people are created in order to fulfil particular purposes, and are encouraged to consume so as to maintain the cycle. The society presented in 1984 is less comfortably balanced. The population is kept content with a rather meagre lot because of the constant war, which, as is explicitly stated in the Book, is a convenient means of maintaining the status quo, and the Party keeps a very close watch on those members of society who are deemed capable of disrupting it. Although set in Orwell's future, 1984 does not put great emphasis on technological advance—indeed, within the society of Oceania, there is effectively none any more, because the methods required for...

Words: 3262 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

The Paperweight In George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty Four

...George Orwell, the author of Nineteen Eighty Four, uses various motifs to help him convey his message. Orwell gives one particular simple household article symbolic significance, in order to develop a theme which is important to him. The specific object which Orwell uses as a motif, is a beautiful glass paperweight. For the novel’s protagonist, Winston Smith, this paperweight represents both beauty without purpose, as well as ongoing hope for the reclamation of his happier, liberated past, and a future without submission to totalitarianism.Through the use of the paperweight as a motif, Orwell is able to convey his grave concerns about life under authoritarian rule. Despite it violating the rules of the Party, Winston purchases a paperweight...

Words: 950 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Comparing Orwell's Brave New World 'And 1984'

...back of the neck I don’t care down with Big Brother" (Orwell 1948) The long and thoughtful reflections of Winston in speech and his diary gives Orwell a window to expose the reader to the novel’s themes, such as using language as mind control, the power of psychological and unfortunately physical intimidation, as well as the manipulation of past events, stories, as well as historical figures themselves. Apart from Winston’s very thoughtful personality, Winston is very well known for his rebelliousness and his fatalism. Winston is very well known for quoting,“If there is hope it lies in the proles” (Huxley 1948). Winston despises the Party with a deep passion and wants to test as well as conflict the limits of its power, hopefully using the proles for rebellion. Committing countless crimes of both thought and physical throughout the novel, from writing “DOWN WITH BIG BROTHER” in his diary purchased from the proles, to later having a love affair with a dark haired women named Julia, to even later signing up and joining a secret anti-Party group known as the Brotherhood. Everything Winston does is for that sweet taste of rebellion and thumbing his nose at this Party, as does Julia with her sex affairs. In conclusion, the similarities of these outcasts are immense, even though both perform their actions for differing reasons. While John is attempting to maintain his innocence and individuality, Winston’s motives are to fight back at the party, and gain his individuality through those...

Words: 857 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Technology In 1984

...1984 teaches how crucial it is to think for yourself. It reminds us that we have the power to choose what we believe and although others can affect those beliefs, we have the overall say on who can impact us. For example, one theme that stuck out to me throughout Orwell's story was fear. Fear plays a major role in our opinions and behaviors, so when we give people the power to instill fear in us, we are giving them the power to control our opinions and behaviors. In Oceania, the government was able to control each of its citizens with this exact tactic. Stories of thought police and what could happen to those that rebelled kept Party members in line, while constant war and attacks prevented proles from causing trouble. Another key aspect of 1984 was education. Despite the fact that proles widely out numbered the Inner Party, their lack of education didn't make them a threat to Big Brother. However, those like Winston and Syme were destined to be vaporized because of their knowledge. I believe that Orwell wrote 1984 as a warning about the dangers of letting too much power get into the wrong hands. Reading this book is important because it reminds us the value of critical thinking, not allowing fear to rule us, and education. Now that I have established why we must read 1984, I will compare today's society with that of Winston's. Our government today has several differences from what Orwell envisioned. First of all, our government's powers are much more limited than Oceania's...

Words: 1174 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Surveillance In George Orwell's 1984

...governed by an oppressive, dictatorial government. Orwell describes how, with suitable expertise, a government could dominate the masses through constant surveillance; for which thought-crime and rebellion is seen as the foremost threat. Following the political uprisings and struggle for power after the Second World War, George Orwell’s 1984 describe the nightmares experienced in a totalitarian state and further exemplify the momentous downfall of the near future. Different mechanisms of these various methods of surveillances remain a prevalent consistency in the novel. Liberty of movement, sentiments, words and actions are all inhibited by the ruling party “Big Brother” [1]. Within this state lie three parties, the Inner Party, Outer Party and proles. Surveillance of the party is adapted to a persona of control given by the slogan, “BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU” [2]. One of the most prevalent ways the party keeps citizens of Oceania under control is through the telescreens. As a dominant form of an autocratic society, these telescreens are found in all rooms belonging to the party members as well as in public places which can never be turned off, however, O’Brien, an Inner Party member has the privilege to turn it off. These telescreens are there to ensure any unlawful activities to be apprehended in the harshest manner. Citizens of Oceania remain unaware and oblivious of the consistent surveillance as it is impossible to be monitored on all screens simultaneously. Upon every action...

Words: 1361 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Totalitarianism In 1984

...operations. It is viewed by the official North Korean line as an embodiment of Kim Il-sung's wisdom (the grandfather of Kim Jong-un), an expression of his leadership, and an idea which provides "a complete answer to any question that arises in the struggle for national liberation". Consequently, the Korean Workers' Party dominates every aspect of North Korean politics, while the North Korean government exercises control over many aspects of the nation's culture, and this control is used to perpetuate a cult of personality surrounding their current leader, Kim Jong-un. Clearly, this type of dictatorship is similar to that of Ingsoc and the Inner Party which exercises control over its own members and the lower class of people, the so called ‘Proles’. The Party controls the country with four ministries, each serving a different purpose, for example economic affairs, law and order, news and so on. The Party controls every source of information. The content of all newspapers and histories are modified to serve its purpose. If one controls the present, it can manipulate the past, and in controlling the past, it can justify all of the actions in the present. All this is used to create a cult of personality towards the Big Brother, a leader and the guardian of the Revolution since its very earliest days, a man so infallible and all-powerful. In Oceania, ‘privacy’ is something unknown to its inhabitants. By means of telescreens and hidden microphones across the city, the Party is able to...

Words: 897 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

How Is Winston's Character Or Influenced By Others In The Book 1984

...Winston says “If there is hope, it lies in the proles”. No matter what he still had hopes even after he was torture by O’brien. (QI) Even after being torture and dehumanized Winston kept his my right. He still had hopes that they will be a person that will rebel against the Party and that will help other people to open their eyes and follow the same pattern. (CD-Q) Winston describes his thoughts as, “ I don't care. In the end they will beat you, sooner or later they will see you for what you are, and then they will tear you to pieces” (269). (CM) Winston is trying to prevent O’brien that there will be a revolution, even though O'brien caught a few of them but he still believes that there is more people out there that feels the same way as him about the Party. While Winston was suffering by getting torture I feel like he was still happy. His mind wasn't set up...

Words: 878 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Dystopian Literature Analysis

...dignity because of his personality and beliefs, his hatred for the Party, and his hope for a better future. Winston’s distinct personality and beliefs in life was a significant cause for his rebellion. His individuality and thoughtfulness allowed him to see through the deceptions and the evil such as history being altered, lying about food ration, and Syme’s vaporization (Orwell, 2008, pp. 11 & 15-16). More importantly, he couldn't adopt doublethink because he was intelligent and wanted to hang on to the last thread of humanity (Moustaki, Nikki, and Gilbert Borman, 2016). For instance, he desired the freedom to say two plus two equaled four and yearned for love and intimacy deeply (Orwell, 2008, pp. 7, 19, 29-32). Winston’s built up hate and anger for the Party continuously fuelled his crimes. The Party took away the fundamental elements in life such as love, sex, and freedom, and replaced it with constant surveillance, manipulation, horrible living conditions, and absolute loyalty to the Party (Sparknote Editors, 2007). Unlike others, Winston understood the Party’s actions but refused to accept it. He was filled with anger and wanted to see the undoing of the Party. Under the harsh oppression of the government, Winston’s rebellion gave him hopes for a better future. He believed that his affair with Julia could overwhelm the Party’s rule (Orwell, 2008, p. 28). Furthermore, he was convinced that the proles would bring down the Party one day (Orwell, 2008, p. 44). It is clear that the...

Words: 1162 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Never Let Me Go vs. 1984

...Ishiguro’s “Never Let Me Go”. The futility of relationships in these works is part of what makes the worlds in which they are based seem so bereft of hope and consequently, dystopic in nature. Never Let Me Go is a supreme dystopian example of a modern day 1984 because the authors give hope to the characters and the audience, they both have an intrinsic human emotion to hold on to, and the people’s future isn’t clearly explained. The vision of humanity’s future, the only truly acceptable thing to ‘love’ is Big Brother. The Party restricts all other love so as to break down the ties between family, friends and lovers whilst transferring this loyalty to the Party itself as a form of control. The Party is said to have, “cut the links between child and parent, and between man and man, and between man and women.” This does not just show the breakdown of relationships, but the reduction of the self. The Party is removing the essential links that allow humanity to be more than a collective of individuals and instead uses this to its own ends, although what these are, beyond a desire for control, we never truly discover. It is partly this lack of knowledge of the Party’s overall goals that makes the situation seem so desperate, it is as though love is being removed without explanation or justification, making the whole process seem devoid of hope as there is no specific element against which to rebel. A similar lack of knowledge also plagues the children of Hailsham in “Never Let Me...

Words: 2087 - Pages: 9