Free Essay


In: Historical Events

Submitted By catekamaa
Words 3333
Pages 14

In the absence of peace, there is conflict. This might lead to war between countries if conflict is not handled carefully. Today it is almost a norm to see countries engaging others in war. Today the greatest problem facing many nations is international relation. Countries have failed to live like decent neighbors. There is disunity among many nations. War between nations is caused by mistrust and tension. Nations purchase arms to stock their armory. Major inventions are made daily in out on nuclear power and how to develop sophiscated weapons. This tries to explain the fact that countries are always in mistrust of each other. It also explains that there is constant tension between countries that one day they may engage in war. War is not acceptable. The consequences are dire and the outcome may last for ages. When nations are at war, there is always mortality and destruction of properties. At times, nation sign peace treaties. This is agreement to maintain a harmonious environment. This appears good on a piece of paper, but healing takes a lot of time. This explains the fact why war between countries may never end.
The origin of the conflict
Israel and Palestine are neighbors. A mention of the two nations brings a memory. The two have never been at peace. There has been constant fighting between the two sides up to date. The conflict is dated way back when the Middle East was still dominated by the British under the colonial rule. Middle East is known for various reasons. The countries are the leading oil producers. This has made America and other states to look for an ally in the region. This is to ensure that they can use the ally to get access of the commodity. Middle East is also known for its vast religions. There has always been conflict between countries which is religion instigated. The three religions are Christianity, Islam and Judaism. It is fascinating to note that all claim to have roots there or originated there. Majority of Israelites are Jewish. The Jews have a lousy memory of the Second World War. They suffered horrendously during that war. Historically all of Israel belonged to the Palestine nation. From 1920 to 1947, Palestine was a British colony. During that time, Palestine colony was made of all the Israel’s occupied territories like Gaza strip, West Bank and other territories. Biblically the Jews believed that that land was rightfully theirs. This was characterized by immigration by the Jews from many corners of the continent to their promised land. This increased tension in Palestine. The height of the tension was in November 1947. At this time, the UN general assembly recommended the partitioning of Palestine into Arabs and Jewish state. This was later to lead to the formation of the state of Israel on May 1948. This was followed by rejection of Israel state by all Arabs states. The Arab states which by then included Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Yemen and Egypt attacked Israel. It is surprising that their armies were defeated by the Israelites army. This has led to constant fighting as Israel continues to take more land from the Palestine and Palestine offer resistance.
The phases of war
The conflict between Israel and Palestine falls into three main categories. We have 1800 to World War 2; these are the conflicts that happened in ancient times. We have the post world war 2 to 2000; these are the conflicts that happened after the world war two up to the year 2000. The other category is from year 2000 to present.
Post World War 2 to 2000
A considerable emphasis is on the two stages since the first stage Israel was not a sovereign state. Israel as a nation came into existence in may 1948.
This was amid a lot of hostility from the Arabs who lived in Palestine by then. The Arabs from the neighboring countries felt that Israel was never supposed to be. This is the root cause of all the problems between Israel and Palestine as well as her neighbors. A major conflict between the two nations is dated way back in 1978. When Israel was partitioned as a state, many Palestinians were taken as refugees in southern Lebanon. As times progressed there was an uprising in Lebanon as the Palestinian opposed Israel rule, In 1978 Palestine attacked Hezbollah. Israel felt invaded and led an offensive attack o Lebanon. Israel attacked Lebanon and went as far as capturing Beirut. The prime target was to bomb Yasser Arafat locations. During this invasion, Israel declared southern Lebanon as a security zone. During these attacks, there were deaths on both sides. The greatest casualties were the children. Israel came to withdraw its security forces from southern Lebanon in May 2000. Another serious crisis came to be in 1980s. This was the intifada. A group of young Palestinians confronted Israeli troops with sling shots and stones. The outcome was not acceptable and many of the youth were shot dead. To lay an offensive attack, the Palestinians used suicide bombers to kill the Israeli troops. Many innocent civilians were killed from both sides.
In 1993 the Oslo peace accord was made. In this accord Israel accepted to recognize the Palestinian liberal organisation (PLO). They were also to give the PLO limited autonomy. The conditions were that PLO were to end a Palestinian claims on Israel territory. The accord was met with different reaction across the world. It was seen as a one sided accord which favored only the Israelites. The accord gave Israel the control of land, water, roads and other resources. This accord was seen as only benefiting the Israelites and not the Palestine people. This was followed closely by withdraw of Israel troops from the Gaza strip and Jericho in 1994. Initially Israel has occupied this place for 27 years.
After Israeli withdraws the Palestine police took charge and replaced the Israelites troops. 1995 saw the killing of Israelis Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin. Yitzhak Rabin had earlier tried to engage the two nations into the peace process. This was critically condemned Jewish extremists. This was termed as betrayal and what followed was his assassination conducted by a Jewish extremist. April 1996, Israel force attacked Lebanon. This was followed by a series of aerial attacks and bombing which lasted for 17 days. During this period, Israeli also attacked a UN camp where some Palestinian civilians had gone to seek refuge. Report indicated that close to 800 Palestinian civilians who were in that camps were killed. This did not make UN happy and, they condemned the attack and claimed that it was intentional. 1998 saw a peace accord the Wye river memorandum. Here, Israel was supposed to withdraw some of its troops from West Bank. The memorandum did not last long. In 1999, Israel suspended the memorandum citing disagreement on the way it was being implemented.
Phase two 2000 to present
The year 2000 saw the pursuit of the Wye river memorandum. Unfortunately, the memorandum failed due to Palestinian protesting. The protest was about continued Israel settlement in the region. The year 2000 also saw former Israel military commander Ariel Sharon go to the temple mount and claim it was Israelis’ eternal place. This sparked protest since it was felt like an invasion on the Palestinian land. In all this time that there were these invasions Palestine felt they had no land of their own. And what was earlier agreed on 1947 was being abused by the Israelites. The continued invasion made Israel to continuously settle on the land which they had previously agreed on to be Palestine’s. Another problem was those Arabs who were not of Israel origin and were on the Israel side were denied many rights.
The Arabs of Palestine origin were denied the right to vote; they were subjected to this discrimination, yet they were supposed to remit their taxes in full. For close to three decades now, the people of Palestine have lived under military occupation. There were bitter sentiments from the Palestinian people emanating from the hostile ways that they were treated by the Israelis. The Palestinians always blamed their government and the Palestinian national authority for failing to address their interests. The outcome of these invasions was received with bitter sentiments from the Arab communities. They felt that Palestine was not treated well by the Israelites. These invasions had a deleterious outcome as Palestinians continued being poor. The war can be attributed to the rising cases of terrorism from the Arab community. They claimed theirs was a holy war they were trying to liberate themselves from oppression from Israelites and countries from Europe.
In the year 2002, Israel took another direction in the name of securing its boundaries. They started constructing a large defensive security wall in the west bank. This was supposed to prevent terrorist invasion on the Israel Cities and settlements. It is fascinating since from the look of things the fence was serving the purpose. There was criticism from the Palestine people about the wall. They termed it as a way of discriminating against them. Israel on the same year started resettlement programme and started resettling her citizens on the controversial lands. In the year 2003, there were rampant suicide attacks on Israel side. This made Israel star tthe campaign against Hamas. This was an organization that was blamed to be behind the rampant suicide bombings. In this year, the Israelites troops refused to negotiate with President Arafat. Arafat fronted Palestinian Prime Minister Mahamoud Abbas. This is the time when a road map to peace was imminent. There was an agreement of a cease fire from the two sides which they agreed on. Palestinian soldiers agreed on the cease fire. Israel was adamant and continued to murder Palestinian militant leaders. During this period, there was a relative calm and everything seemed to be okay. Unfortunately, this calm did not last long. It was later followed by targeted assassination from Israel as well as suicide bombing from Palestine. Mahamoud Abbas resigned from his post. This was as a result of frustration. Ahmed Qurei took over. In 2004 Ariel Sharon by then the prime minster announced a withdrawal of its troops from the Gaza strip. He also maintained that Israel was to have large control over the west bank. This was met with continued suicide bombing. The Israelites this time managed to assassinate Hamas spiritual leader sheikh Ahmed Yassin. Shortly they also managed to kill Abdel Aziz al Rantissi. At this time, the wall at the west bank continued to be constructed. This was amid protests from the international community as well as the international criminal court which termed it as illegal. Israel is not a member of the international criminal court so, it continued to construct. November 2004 saw the death of Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat resulting from a mysterious blood disorder. The death of Arafat was mourned by Palestinians. Later Abbas assumed the role of the leader of PLO. The year 2005 saw Abbas being elected the as Palestinian authority president. During this time, Abbas worked tremendously hard to persuade the Hamas and Islamic jihad to stop attacks on Israel. Ariel Sharon on his part managed to withdraw some of its troops from Gaza strip. This was met with mixed reaction though, by September, he managed to withdraw all the troops from Gaza strip. This was a crucial step towards peace and reconciliation. For the first time in a longtime, it was imagined that a peace deal was about to be struck. 2005 also saw the resignation of Ariel Sharon from the right wing likud party. This was partly because he was losing popularity from that side. This was because he agreed to withdraw troops from the Gaza strip. He later managed to form a more centrist party, kadima.
The party gained popularity and this was closely followed by former Prime Minister Shimon Perez leaving his labor party aligned to the left wing. He joined the kadima party. Sharon was seen as distancing himself from the policy of a larger Israel party. His driving force was peaceful negotiation between Israel and Palestine.
January 2006 saw what was referred to as paradox democracy. This resulted when Hamas the then thought to be a terrorist group gained power in Palestine. This came with sharp criticism from the nations which have labeled Hamas as a terror group. April 2006 saw Ehud Olmert become the prime minister of Israel this was because the then prime minister Ariel Sharon feel sick. The Israel cabinet declared him unable to carry his task in that capacity. Apart from the border fighting the oil in Middle East is seen as another critical issue fuelling the disagreement. Israel and Palestine are not oil rich. Israel with support from the west has managed to buy leaders from the oil rich countries. This is through providing the leaders with strong military or financial support. Israel has supported the coming into power of those corrupt leaders. At times, the UN Security Council feels that what Israel is doing against the Palestinians some conduct are not warranted. There have been numerous resolutions emanating from the UN Security Council. Some of these resolutions like the UN resolution 242 told Israel to return the land that they captured in 1967. These resolutions were vetoed by the United States. It is true the UN was trying to come with a number of resolutions but, the United States veto powers disallowed them. The US is seen as assisting Israel with military aids. It is believed that in the Middle East Israel has the most advanced military equipments.

2006 saw increased targeted assassination of Hamas and Hezbollah leaders by the Israelites. The Palestinian people are always intensely frustrated. They claim that Israel takes their prime lands, and they are only left with the less usable land. To date no significant peace deal has been made.
Impacts of the war
The impact of any kind of war is disastrous, horrendous and hard to bear with. The war has injured, killed and maimed many people from either sides. This is against the norms and principles of either religion. This is also a denial of the right to live to those individuals. This has led the countries to lose valuable nationalities who would aid in the nation building. This is happening contrary to the religious teachings. The war has heavily affected the economies of both Israel and Palestine. This is culminated by destruction to infrastructure. A look on Israel indicates that its economy is dipping as the conflict increases. This can be attributed to allocation of a lot of funds to war. This has left the economic budget deprived. Also, the concentration time on the economy is little as principal focus is on national security. Sectors like tourism has been badly hit since the tourists are wary of their security. This has resulted to decreased revenue from the tourism sector. A survey indicated during the year 1995 when there were less violence the rate of tourism almost doubled so was the revenue from the sector. This is a clear indication that continued violence affects the country’s revenue collection. Increased invasion has also impacted badly in the international market. This has made the countries neighbors to decline from buying goods made from Israel. This has made Israel to form allies with countries outside the Middle East

On the other hand, the war has impacted badly on the Palestinian side. The greatest blow was on economy. The Palestinians are left without a country though they have control on West Bank. This has led them to be continuously dependent on the economy of Israel. They are not a country of their own hence they are forced to trade with Israel. Palestinians are made to provide cheap labors to the Israelites industries.They are affected negatively by the violence because, as the violence escalates, they are made to leave Israel. This is also characterized by wage drop and increased rate of unemployment.
A summary of possible causes of Israel and Palestinian war
The initial cause of the conflict is the claims by Jews that the land of Israel was eternal, holy and they were given by God. This has made the Jews to see the land that is indicated on the bible to be theirs and is supposed to occupy it. The land contains historical holy cities like Jerusalem, Jericho which they deem as theirs. Conflict arises since the Muslims also consider Jerusalem as their holy land. They say that Mohamed ascended to heaven in Buraq over Jerusalem temple. The conflicts arose since the two cultures wanted to control the city. Zionism was another factor which contributed to this problem. Before the Second World War, there was a belief that people of European culture were superior to those Jews counterparts. Zionism was born out of this since the Jews felt they were not less citizens. This propagated the war since the Jews used it as a way of redeeming themselves. This was also a way of showing they were not any less human beings. Zionism was also a secular organization which advocated for the idea of hallowed land. The UN resolution 181 also aggravated the problem. This is because it allowed the immigration of Jews from Europe. The resolution also allowed the Jews to form their own state in Middle East. The resolution further promoted the partitioning of Palestine into a Jewish and Arab state. Palestinian ideology of the partitioning also contributed to the conflict. The Palestinian thought that they were superior to Israelis. They thought that they would go and later use force to drive away the Israelites. Unfortunately, this was never to be. To date some of the Palestinians are in refugee camps. The occupation of the West Bank and Gaza strip in 1967 also instigated the war. These territories are not fully under the Israelis rule. It is unfortunate that those Palestinians living there had to contend with Israel’s check points and military provisions. Retaliation is another factor that has continually fuelled the war. When one side attacks the other the one attacked always wage a retaliatory attack. This has led to constant fighting.
Peace and tranquility in Palestine and Israel seems impossible. There has been constant effort to bring the two sides to work together but, this has yielded no fruits. It is the obligation of the upcoming generation to learn to put their differences aside. There is no war that has ever been won. There are bitter outcomes to be dealt with even after many years. The best thing is to avert war and to live harmoniously as one. It is the will of God that human beings to correlate and stay as one. It is therefore the obligation of each one of us to be our neighbor’s keeper. In order to enhance peace and tranquility we have to start from the remarkably sincere society set up, that is the family. When families live together, they encourage counties to live together and nations to live harmoniously. It is fascinating to observe that amid the crisis Israel still needs Palestine to provide labor. This is a clear indication that no nation can survive on its own. The noble thing is to put their differences aside and live harmoniously as one. I believe in a liberalized Israel Palestine it can be done the two can correlate they just need to believe.

Works Cited
Carter, Jimmy. Palestine: peace not apartheid. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2006. Print.
Harms, Gregory, and Todd M. Ferry. The Palestine-Israel conflict: a basic introduction. London: Pluto, 2005. Print.
King, John. Israel and Palestine. Chicago, Ill.: Raintree, 2006. Print.
Newman, David. Population, settlement, and conflict: Israel and the West Bank. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991. Print.
Rowley, Gwyn. Israel into Palestine. London: Mansell ;, 1984. Print.
Smith, Charles D.. Palestine and the Arab-Israeli conflict. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1988. Print.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Israel and Palestine

...Islam and the Rejection of Violence Mohammad Ibrahim Miqdad Dr. Mohammad Ibrahim Miqdad is a professor o f economics at the Islamic University in Gaza. Religions arose to organize the lives o f people on the divine bases o f justice, tolerance, values and ethics. Islam, the last o f the Abraham ic religions, has the same bases and values. Prophet M ohammad said (Hadith), “I w as only sent to finalize the noble ethics.” In addition, his m essage that “God loves those who are good benefit to the people” was advice to people o f all beliefs, not only M uslims. He also preached, “All the people are the children o f God, and he loves those who are a good benefit to his children.” This message applied to all people, since they come from the same spirit regardless o f race, ethnicity or religion. In the Q u r’an, Surat A n-N isa’ (The Women), verse 1 states: In the name o f God, the Gracious, the M erciful, “O m ankind fear your Lord, who created you from one soul.” Denouncement of Violence In regards to relationships with the others, Islam walks in the path o f flexibility and denounces violence. In the Q u r’an, Surat A l-’A n 'am (The Cattle), verse 108 states: In the name o f God, the Gracious, the M erciful O m ankind, “And do not insult those they invoke other than Allah, lest they insult Allah in enm ity without know ledge.” In the name o f God, the Gracious, the M erciful O mankind, “ So by m ercy from Allah, [O M uham m ad], you were lenient with......

Words: 3173 - Pages: 13

Free Essay

Israel-Palestine Media Coverage

...Israel-Palestine Conflict Haaretz vs. Al Jazeera vs. Fox and CNN Palestinian President, Mahmoud Abbas, recently won the United Nations’ General Assembly vote of Palestine being recognized as an observer state and now they are officially considered the “State of Palestine” by popular vote. Israel and the United States, however, did not recognize Palestine’s upgrade within the UN. This issue is very important to understand the United States’ role in today’s Israel-Palestine relations. The United States’ most watched news channels, Fox and CNN, have a very one-sided view on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict—generally one that favors Israel. Al Jazeera, the most popular Arab news channel, seems objective for the most part, but occasionally Palestinian favoritism can be seen. Haaretz newspaper, the most read Israeli newspaper in English, seems to be neutral, but also anti-Hamas on this debate; however, it does acknowledge good aspects of the Palestinian side. All of this is apparent through the wording used in the articles, the various sources of each news channel’s information, and the amount of opinions versus fact based information included in each article. The United States is a proud supporter of Israel and has been ever since Israel declared statehood. As seen in history, Israel has had full U.S. support not only militarily, but through the media also. The CNN and Fox articles are both about how the Palestine is treated, or should be treated by the United States. ......

Words: 878 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Background to the Israel-Palestine Crisis

...made three different promises regarding historic Palestine. Arab leaders were assured that the land would become independent; in the Balfour declaration, Britain indicated its support for a Jewish national home in Palestine; and secretly Britain arranged with its allies to divide up Ottoman territory, with Palestine becoming part of the British empire. Historians have engaged in detailed exegesis of the relevant texts and maps, but the fundamental point is that Britain had no moral right to assign Palestine to anyone. By right Palestine belonged to its inhabitants. In the late l9th century, anti-Semitism became especially virulent in Russia and re-emerged in France. Some Jews concluded that Jews would only be safe in a Jewish state and thus founded Zionism. Most Jews at the time rejected Zionism, preferring instead to address the problem of anti-Semitism through revolutionary or reformist politics or assimilation. For many orthodox Jews, especially the small Jewish community in Palestine, a Jewish state could only be established by God, not by humans. At first Zionists were willing to consider other sites for their Jewish state, but they eventually focused on Palestine for its biblical connections. The problem, however, was that although a Zionist slogan called Palestine "a land without people for a people without land," the land was not empty. Following World War I, Britain arranged for the League of Nations to make Palestine a British "mandate," that is, a colony to be......

Words: 995 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

An Argument for Israel-Palestine Resolution

...An Argument for Israel-Palestine Resolution: Comparing and Contrasting Factors of Religious and Non-Religious Arguments Avoiding a historical discussion of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict might be advantageous for now given this paper is meant to argue, while comparing and contrasting the two nations, that resolution to the conflict in contemporary times can not be achieved so easily, as simple as it may seem to supporters on both sides of “the cause”. The situation between these two highly conflicted states is complicated by elements that must be addressed. These warring nations have a rough history tracing back all the way to before the time of the Islamic Caliphate in the 7th century[1]. However, “putting aside their differences” is an idea that does not seem as practical as it sounds. It is my assumption that both states are threatened by and threatening to each other so long as they act out of religious intolerance. Struggling to determine which side is more or less at fault only further complicates the issue and does little to actually help resolve the conflicts. It is my argument that, instead of a resolution coming externally, the struggle must begin with issues of cultural and ethnic identity at the state level and among its constituents. This concern reinforces the necessity to understand one’s own culture before the door can be opened to allow for improvement and more favorable conditions on both sides of the conflict. It would be unreasonable to......

Words: 1484 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Conflict Between Israel and Palestine

...Palestine In 1948, the State of Israel was established on Palestinian land, despite widespread protests by Palestinians and the Arab world. Clashes between Palestinians and Israelis have since been numerous and bloody, and it is still far away from a peaceful, lasting solution to the conflict. Last updated 04/03/2013 Recent UN links Presentation of the humanitarian situation in the area of ​​the UN humanitarian agency OCHA Map of humanitarian conditions of the UN humanitarian agency OCHA UN special agency for Palestine refugees, UNRWA UN News summary page for news on the Middle East Early history Both Palestinians and Israelis are people originating in the Middle East. The central question of the Middle East conflict today is who has the most right to the area. The Jews were driven around the year 70 AD, and was then spread throughout Europe and the Middle East. For many years they were denied access to the area, while in their new country were often subjected to persecution and abuse. As a result of including the Inquisition in southern Europe, many Jews chose the 1500 - and 1600's to settle in Palestine again. It is estimated that the total population of Palestine was then at 200 000, while the Jewish population accounted for approximately 15 000 The organized Jewish immigration to Palestine began in 1882. This happened as a result of the rise of Zionism in Europe. Zionism was a political movement working for a Jewish state in the Middle East. Zionist movement......

Words: 2626 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Analysing the Israel-Palestine Conflict in International Relations Perspective

...Analysing the Israel-Palestine Conflict in International Relations Perspective Introduction to International Relations Analysing the Israel-Palestine Conflict in International Relations Perspective Background Since the early 20th Century, Israelis and Palestinians have been fighting over the land between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea. With the assumption that Palestine is a state to facilitate discussion, this report sketches out the most significant elements of the conflict on the three levels defined by Kenneth Waltz, and applies the Realist theory of international relations (IR) to the “Two-State” solution. Levels of analysis 1. First Level The first level focuses on individuals involved in the international relations. On Israel’s side, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has an important role to play because he has the final word in all political decisions. On the side of Palestine, Mahmoud Abbas enjoys an even stronger position. Not only is he the chairman of Fatah and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), he is also the President of the Palestinian National Authority (PA), which is the ruling body for the Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank. He does not to have to face elections as he runs an authoritarian regime. On the regional level, the most influential figure is Mohamed Morsi, President of Egypt, who is vital to negotiating efforts for the conflict. Egypt is the first Arab country to accept Israel......

Words: 1977 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Issue of Cease Fire Between Israel and Palestine

...Issue of Cease-fire between Israel and Hamas not likely to be Resolved International Community has urged Israel to not wage a ground war against Palestine but on Sunday, July 13th Israel has launched a ground attack in which around 18 members of the a family dies. The incursion by Israel was centred to the site from where Hamas, The Sunni Islamist Group in Gaza Strip was launching its long ranged rockets targeted to the Israel. Israel and Hamas indulged in a fight since few weeks, till now Hamas was using rockets to attack Israel and in counter Israel was using airstrikes but now as the situation become severe Israel has took the route of incursion from ground. Restoration of Cease-fire between Israel and Gaza Strip has been issue of discussion among many regional as well as international players. Quartet on Middle East named Group has been established in 2002 to mediate the peace talks in between Israel and Palestine, four member entities of this group are United States, Russia, European Union and United Nations. Special Envoy of the group, Tony Blair visited Cairo in Egypt regarding the issue and had a meeting with President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi to facilitate peace talk between Israel and Hamas so that a cease-fire can be restored between them. But as the sources revealed efforts to stop the conflict are going in vain because Hamas has asserted that there is no possibility of peace now and the Islamist group won’t become the part of any truce. As no international player is......

Words: 414 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

How Has Palestinian Application for Un Membership and Statehood Recognition Affected the Advancement of the Peace Process Between Israel and Palestine?

...Abstract The purpose of the research “How has Palestinian application for UN membership and statehood recognition affected the advancement of the peace process between Israel and Palestine?“ was to provide a thorough examination of the Arab-Israeli conflict and estimate the possible courses of its development in case of UN interference into the matter. The method used in the process of investigation consisted in accessing English and Israeli websites, including the official website of the Parliament of Israel, in order to collect the necessary information on the issue. A vast amount of opinions was gathered and applied in the research, that helped to create the holistic picture of the problem under consideration. As a result of the investigation the conclusion has been drawn that at the present moment Palestinian bid for statehood and membership rather added to the problem than helped to solve it. Although each of the UN members has its own interests to pursue in this conflict, the majority of the UN member states still refrain from any steps towards the conflict resolution and consider the admission of Palestine to the UN impossible until certain agreement is achieved between the two countries. Page numbers Introduction to the Essay 2 Subheading 1: The attempts to negotiate peace between Israel and Palestine. 4 Subheading 2: The official standpoints of the sides involved. Reasons for obtaining UN membership and statehood. Public response in Palestinian......

Words: 4076 - Pages: 17

Free Essay

International Finance

...How Many Countries in the World? There are 196 countries in the world today. Unless you don't count Taiwan… Taiwan is not considered an official country by many, which would bring the countdown to 195 countries. Although Taiwan operates as an independent country, many countries (including the U.S.) do not officially recognize it as one. Because the People's Republic of China considers Taiwan a breakaway province of China, countries who wish to maintain diplomatic relations with China have had to sever their formal relations with Taiwan (more than 100 countries, however, have unofficial relations with Taiwan). | | | Republic of China Geography: The Republic of China today consists of the island of Taiwan, an island 100 mi (161 km) off the Asian mainland in the Pacific; two off-shore islands, Kinmen (Quemoy) and Matsu; and the nearby islets of the Pescadores chain. It is slightly larger than the combined areas of Massachusetts and Connecticut. Government: Multiparty democracy. History: Taiwan was inhabited by aborigines of Malayan descent when Chinese from the areas now designated as Fukien and Kwangtung began settling it in the 7th century, becoming the majority. The Portuguese explored the area in 1590, naming it “the Beautiful” (Formosa). In 1624 the Dutch set up forts in the south, the Spanish in the north. The Dutch forced out the Spanish in 1641 and controlled the island until 1661, when Chinese general Koxinga took it over and established an independent kingdom...

Words: 1440 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Causes of the Six Day War

...the causes of Israel-Palestine war? TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT AANALYSIS THE CAUSES OF ISRAEL/PALESTINE CONFLICT: THE FIRST INTIFADA 1987-93 DIVIDING THE MAP THE 1948 WAR ZIONISM 1967/OCCUPATION THE ARABS, TERRORISM & SECURITY: “NO SOLUTION” THE WALL/FENCE/BARRIER DELEGITIMIZING THE STATEHOOD DECLARATION BY PALESTINE THE IMPACT OF SCARCE WATER RESOURCES ON THE ARAB-ISRAEL CONFLICT CAMP DAVID FAILURE THE ISRAEL-PALESTINE CONFLICT IS CENTRAL TO THE MILITANTS’ CAUSE Abstract The notion of this research essay is to discuss the causes of the Israel-Palestine war. The first priority of the paper is to address the war in detail by describing the war. Another perspective that the essay will take in answering the causes of the Israel-Palestine war is to address the period of the war and how it emerged. The Israel-Palestine war is also denounced as the primary consequence that has formed the Israel-Arab war. The nature of the war is somehow a contagious form of war as it is fundamental in the creation of the upheaval of the Arab states conflict. The essay will also discuss the causes in the different sequence. This will be done by stating which cause took place before the following cause emerged. The principal ideology of the essay is to come to a founding cause that resulted to the war preceding other causes. Therefore the research paper will discuss the causes of the Israel conflict with the aim of establishing the causes that formed the Israel-Palestine war. ......

Words: 4159 - Pages: 17

Premium Essay

The Middle East Conflict

...who cling to the past; between those who open their arms and those who are determined to clench their fists (William J. Clinton, 2013). Even though people who live in Palestine/Turkey/Syria area between1988 - 2013 have been in a state of war, peace will soon come. The Middle East is at constant war, peace will not come soon enough if rules don’t apply to self-government. In the 1800’s Europe wanted to colonize Palestine land know as Zionists. The majority of the population was Jewish, which they wanted to create a Jewish homeland. This did not create a conflict until more Zionist immigrants population increased and talks of them taking over the Jewish land. The conflict in Palestine grew when Germany leader Adolf Hitler combined with Zionist engagements to disrupt efforts to reside Jewish refugees in western countries. The Zionists armies outnumbered the Arab and the Palestine army combined, and they fought on Palestine land. At the end of the war, Israel had taken over seventy-eight percent of the Palestine’s land; this is what has led up to the current conflict today. Muslims and Christians are unable to return to their home which is now a Jewish State. In November 1988 the National Council of Palestine declared Palestine as a state. The formal beginning of the peace process started to unite the Arabs and Israel this process was called the Oslo Accords or the Declaration of Principles on Interim Self-Government Arrangements. The Oslo Accords came up with a peace......

Words: 1125 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Conflict Research Perspective

...Conflict Research Perspectives - Israel Israel and Palestine have been in a land war for years fighting over entitlement that neither really have. Both Palestine and Israel believe that the land that they both occupy belongs to them and will not stop until one side surrenders the rights to the land. The argument is over the Gaza Strip, Hamas, and the West Bank. Many different people with different religious beliefs once occupied Palestine who had at one time been occupied by Turkey. Over the years a large Jewish population had fled to Palestine and a group formed called the Zionist. This group believed that they had the right to the land because based on Biblical texts it was the Holy Land and only those who were descendants of the biblical Jewish faith should have rights to the land. “The Jewish claim Palestine is actually the site of the ancient land of Israel, which was, according to the Hebrew Bible promised to the Jewish by God.” (Ebscohostconnection) During World War I a letter was drafted stating that the British would support a Jewish national home. “During World War I, in 1916, it convinced Arab leaders to revolt against the Ottoman Empire (which was allied with Germany). In return, the British government would support the establishment of an independent Arab state in the region, including Palestine.” (Shah, 2006) After World War I Turkey lost control of the Palestine and the British now controlled it. The League of Nations ended up approving the letter that had...

Words: 696 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

The Gaza Strip

...Palestine has been recognized as a common ground for the constant and continuous conflict between the Jewish and Arabic communities. Through these situations, outer forces, such as Britain, have attempted avaricious approaches to the predicament, which ultimately led to the eruption between the two parties[1]. Beginning with World War 1, The Sykes-Picot Agreement, and the Arabs, following through to The Balfour Declaration with the Jews, showed that the respective parties were forced to rely on outside forces to help mend their broken hearts full of nationalism and possession[2]. It is safe to say that these two breeds of strong-hearted individuals made an impact in more places than Palestine itself. With Britain’s reign over the land, it was the duty of the Arabs and the Jews to get along with one another as best as they could, provided that Britain would give each party what they were owed[3]. Britain and The Balfour Declaration contradicted the original deal during World War 1 between Britain and the Arab community, sparking the conflict between the Arabs and the Jews, which, to this day, made living in Palestine a hostile and challenging place to call ‘home’. The Balfour Declaration, created in 1917, revealed the British offering Israel as a homeland for the Jewish people[4]. For the Jews, this meant that they would finally be able to have what is rightfully their own. Israel is the birthplace of the Jewish community, and living on the land where their story began has......

Words: 2226 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

The Palestinian Right of Having a State

...earlier phases of the same conflict, between the Zionist yishuv and the Arab population living in Palestine under Ottoman and then British rule. It forms part of the wider Arab–Israeli conflict. The remaining key issues are: mutual recognition, borders, security, water rights, control of Jerusalem, Israeli settlements, Palestinian freedom of movement and legalities concerning refugees. The violence resulting from the conflict has prompted international actions, as well as other security and human rights concerns, both within and between both sides, and internationally. In addition, the violence has curbed expansion of tourism in the region, which is full of historic and religious sites that are of interest to many people around the world. The Palestinian Authority has announced its intentions to ask the United Nations to recognize the establishment of a sovereign Palestinian state. What is the significance of such recognition? Can the United Nations establish a Palestinian state? In order to address this question appropriately, it is first necessary to correct the common misconception that the United Nations established the State of Israel.  On November 29, 1947, the U.N. General Assembly only approved the partition plan that would replace the British Mandate over the land of Israel. The decision of the U.N. General Assembly was binding in that case because of the special status of Palestine as a territory under British Mandate, a system which was intended to prepare......

Words: 1658 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Palestinian-Israeli Conflict from the Perspective of Palestinian Filmmakers the movie production, further, poses a greater challenge in the industry. The various Palestinian movie production sites include the Authority of Palestinian, the different Diasporas in Palestinian and also other producers in Israel. The Palestinian Cinema can, therefore, be viewed as an opposing representation because it originated from the conflict between Palestinian and Israel. The conflict between Palestinian and Israel began man years ago due to the decision of the United States to form Israel. The conflicts between the two nations involve the Arabs who are the Palestinians and Jewish who are the Israelites. The war has resulted in death of many people and has further, led to discrepancies between the Israelites and many Arab nations. The differences between the Zionists and various Arab nations that are not involved in the actual conflict are as a result of their involvement in the war to assist the Palestinians. According to Bulton (2013), most of the Palestinian films are based on the background of the colonialism of Israel. Further, if focuses on the misconception of the visual manifestation of the existence of the Palestinians movies in the media internationally. This essay evaluates and discusses the conflict between Israeli and Palestine from the standpoint of the Arabs and also Palestinian filmmakers. Besides, a comparison and a distinction of how the conflict...

Words: 2457 - Pages: 10