It Is Said That Many Companies Are over Managed and Under Led. Define Leadership and Explain What the Path-Goal Theory of Leadership Is. Identify the Four Leadership Styles of Path-Goal Theory and Explain When They Are Most Appropriately Used.

In: Business and Management

Submitted By sloanne
Words 1328
Pages 6
In this era of socialism, most people do not like to be over-controlled and over- managed. They tend to have higher free will and thinking, work and etc. Leaders will have different leadership styles to manage and lead their employees which are identified by the path–goal theory of leadership. This is why the attitude and the behavior of a leader will influence his/her subordinates on achieving their goals and objectives.
Leadership is mostly defined as a process of leading or influencing a group of people or an organization to achieve their goals. According to Yukl, ‘it is obvious that a person can be a leader without becoming a manager, and a person can be a manager without leading’. In my opinion, a leader has long-term of view which inspires and motivates his/her subordinates and work together to achieve their vision, mission, goals and objectives. And, a manager is a problem solver of the status quo which focuses on productivity and efficiency. Hence, they are different from each other.
Path-goal theory is related to leadership. It is a specific theory which is based on leadership styles or behaviour. Path-goal theory states on how leaders achieve high level of performance, influence own and their employees satisfaction and performance to achieve the performance and organisation’s goal. This is by clearing and clarifying the path, increasing the number of rewards that is available for them. Additionally, a leader can also change and regulate his/her leadership style of behaviour to the employees and task behaviours so that they will have the motivation to achieve the goals.
In other hand, the path goal theory identifies four types of leadership styles which are Directive, Supportive, Participative and Achievement-oriented. These leadership styles are based on two factors in the leadership behaviour which is initiating structure and consideration.…...

Similar Documents

Path Goal

...Path-Goal Theory of Leadership Introduction The path-goal theory developed by House(1971) and developed over the next several years(e.g. House, 1999), Since that’s time there are a lot of studies created to test of the theory, argues that leaders can adjust their own behaviors to adapt to contingencies and in this way find the most suitable style for any particular situation. The theory states that the main goal of the leader is to help subordinates attain the subordinates' goals effectively, and to provide them with the necessary direction and support to achieve their own goals as well as those of the organization. In particular leader: Leaders can take a strong or limited approach in these. In clarifying the path, they may be directive or give vague hints. In removing roadblocks, they may scour the path or help the follower move the bigger blocks. In increasing rewards, they may give occasional encouragement. This variation in approach will depend on the situation, including the follower's capability and motivation, as well as the difficulty of the job and other contextual factors. The theory proposes four different kinds of leadership styles. They are directive or instrumental, supportive, participative and achievement-oriented leadership styles. An effective leader is one who knows which style to use and when to use it. House and Mitchell (1974) defined four kinds of behavior in more specific terms: Directive leader behavior is behavior directed toward providing...

Words: 1169 - Pages: 5

Path-Goal Theory

...Path-Goal theory stresses on change in leaders behavior to satisfy followers needs by setting clear path, removing hurdles and roadblocks, assisting, providing direction, support and offering rewards to achieve goals. Path-Goal Leadership Theory tells about four different leadership behavior and its effect on performance, satisfaction and motivation of the team. Leaders can take a strong or limited approach in these. In clarifying the path, they may be directive or give vague hints. In removing roadblocks, they may scour the path or help the follower move the bigger blocks. In increasing rewards, they may give occasional encouragement or pave the way with gold. This variation in approach will depend on the situation, including the follower's capability and motivation, as well as the difficulty of the job and other contextual factors. Path-Goal Leadership Theory tells about four different leadership behaviors and its effect on performance, satisfaction and motivation of the team. Defined following four kind of leader behavior: 1. Directive (tell) 2. Supportive (inform) 3. Participative (involve) 4. Achievement-oriented (set goals and want the subordinate achieve them) Directive (Tell): The leader clarifies the path to the goal by providing clear directives. And telling followers what needs to be done and giving appropriate guidance along the way. This includes giving them schedules of specific work to be done at specific times. This...

Words: 441 - Pages: 2

Path Goal Theory

... process, as to assure that their consultants have credibility and skills. Consideration structure type is used since the people are very skilled people and how head of accident’s prevention said “relation with them is professional and pleasant and I work more in collaboration with people”. Path-Goal Theory also states that leaders must explain the pathways to various goals of concern to employees and the prospect to achieve such goals should advance job satisfaction, leader recognition, and high effort. At Hydro-Quebec usually employees are explained what is explained of them during the job interview. They are explained the nature of the work, the responsibilities and more specific tasks will be discussed. Further, in our case employees are evaluated on an annual basis. There are two evaluations; one is testing the skills and the other the work ethic of the employee, in order to make reward contingent with the organizational goals. Employees of ethical leaders are more pleased with their superior, more prepared to devote extra effort to one’s job, and more prepared to report problems to management. In path-goal theory there are numerous helpful aspects. To begin with, the theory provides theoretical framework in support of, how subordinates work performance and satisfaction are affected by various leadership behaviors. Path Goal Leadership Theory helps leaders in choosing an appropriate leadership style correlated with the situational variables. Moreover it’s practical......

Words: 1449 - Pages: 6

Path Goal Leadership

... studies are more in line with the House’s path-goal theory. Michigan University‘s found three leader behaviors that are instrumental to effective leadership. The behavior identified in the Michigan University study has a correlation to House’s leader behavior in his path-goal theory. Michigan’s task- oriented behavior relates to House’s leader directiveness and achievement-oriented leadership behavior. Michigan’s relationship oriented behavior relates to House’s supportive leadership. And lastly Michigan’s participative task-oriented behavior, relates to House’s participative leadership behavior. There is no one best way to lead or one type of behavior that works for all situations. Three important components of leadership must be considered when determining what style of leadership to use; the leader, the people being led and the situation. The path-goal leadership theory describes how leaders can encourage and support their subordinates in achieving the goals. Earlier in this paper I discussed the four leader behavior in the path-goal leadership theory. The style of leadership to employ depends on the situation. Studies show the directive leadership behavior is most effective when subordinates are engaged in ambiguous, unstructured tasks and the follower is inexperienced. This increases the follower's sense of security and control and hence is appropriate to the situation. The supportive leadership behavior increases the follower's self-esteem and making the job......

Words: 1044 - Pages: 5

Theory of Leadership Style

... degree of motivation. You must know your people! The fundamental starting point is having a good understanding of human nature, such as needs, emotions, and motivation. You must come to know your employees' be, know, and do attributes. Communication You lead through two-way communication. Much of it is nonverbal. For instance, when you “set the example,” that communicates to your people that you would not ask them to perform anything that you would not be willing to do. What and how you communicate either builds or harms the relationship between you and your employees. Situation All situations are different. What you do in one situation will not always work in another. You must use your judgment to decide the best course of action and the leadership style needed for each situation. For example, you may need to confront an employee for inappropriate behavior, but if the confrontation is too late or too early, too harsh or too weak, then the results may prove ineffective. Also note that the situation normally has a greater effect on a leader's action than his or her traits. This is because while traits may have an impressive stability over a period of time, they have little consistency across situations (Mischel, 1968). This is why a number of leadership scholars think the Process Theory of Leadership is a more accurate than the Trait Theory of Leadership. Various forces will affect these four factors. Examples of forces are your relationship with......

Words: 13423 - Pages: 54

Leadership Behavoior: Path Goal Theory

...The Path-Goal Theory provides four different leadership behaviors which leaders can use depending on the situation. In my interview with fraternity president, Lex Wild, I discovered that he used all four leadership behaviors. The fraternity provides a vast array of circumstances as well as situations concerning its members that call for the use of all the leadership behaviors. The most successful leadership behavior which Lex uses is that of directive leadership. Lex felt that his role as president went hand in hand with the directive leadership behavior. Duties such as presiding over meetings, making sure other officers execute their duties or enforcing bylaws require setting goals and having set standards. Lex felt this leadership behavior worked the best because when leading a fraternity you have procedures to follow and schedules to keep. For example getting new members ready for initiation or meeting with the educational leadership counselor (ELC) every semester requires following strict guidelines and preparation. This behavior when compared to others was the only one which really emphasized a “hands on approach” and the most control over issues pertaining to the house. In a fraternity with fifty plus members who have different combinations of locus of control, perceived ability, and direct contact with the president, directive behavior leadership has proved to be the most efficient. This became clearly apparent when Jeremiah, in his second year as president, was...

Words: 1066 - Pages: 5

Path-Goal/Expectancy Theory

...Individual project: MGT 680 Student Name:       Goal: Developing a thorough understanding of theories by applying a motivation theory and a leadership theory to a popular movie. Movie choice (Indicate option on pull-down menu): Path Goal Theory: Identify the four behaviors used by leaders (according to this theory) and the situations under which each behavior should be used: Behavior 1: Directive Leaders - directive leadership is defined in its name. The leader's followers require direction and expect to hear from the leader regarding how they carry out their duties. For this type of leadership to be effective, typically the followers are working within an environment that is ad-hoc and unstructured. An example of a directive leader would be a yoga teacher. As the leader, he/she is in charge of directing the students on what to do next (especially in a first-time class). Behavior 2: Supportive Leaders - supportive leadership takes place when the leader creates an environment that is friendly and free from encumbrances that the other leaderships defined within this section hinder. It's proven that this leadership style is most effective within that are mentally challenging. An example of a supportive leader would be a Major League Baseball pitching coach. As the leader, he/she is in charge of calming the pitchers nerves and mind when on the mound. Behavior 3...

Words: 4173 - Pages: 17

Leadership and the Path-Goal Theory

...Define leadership. What is the path-goal theory of leadership? Identify the four leadership styles of path-goal theory and explain when they are most appropriately used In this essay leadership and the path-goal theory will be discussed, also 3 articles that examine different parts of leadership will also be reviewed. 2 articles involve experiments, one of which test the path-goal theory in Tawain, and the other studies a contingent view of leadership and the last article looks at transforming leadership for success and sustainability, with H Davenport’s own experience to discuss leadership Leadership can be defined as the procedure of influencing others in order to reach organizations or group goals. Another way of defining leadership “is inspiring others to pursue your vision within parameters you set, to the extent that it becomes a shared effort, a shared vision and shared success” (businessnewsdaily n.d.). There are many different types of leaders and a number of diverse roles in which leaders play. Fielder’s contingency theory, the path-goal theory is one way of improving leadership roles and becoming a more enhanced leader. Path goal theory states “leaders can increase subordinate satisfaction and performance by clarifying and clearing the paths to goals and by increasing the number and kinds of rewards available of goal attainment” (Mc Williams 2010, p. 238). Path-goal theory has four styles of leadership. One style is directive leadership which is used when...

Words: 1550 - Pages: 7

Path Goal Theory and Its Effect on Motivation

...Executive Summary The Path-goal theory was originally developed by Evans (1970) and later modified by House (1971). The theory was designed to identify a leader’s most practiced leadership style as motivation to get subordinates to accomplish goals. The path-goal theory reinforces the idea that motivation plays an important part in how a supervisor and a subordinate interact and, based on that interaction, the overall success of the subordinate (House, 1971). To test whether employee productivity and motivation is linked to clearly defined, specific and challenging goals we distributed surveys to both the employees and managers of two Scotia Bank branches in the British Virgin Islands and Dominica. The surveys were both tailored to glean the leadership styles of the managers and provide a clear insight into how employees perceived their jobs. Upon analysis of the data we can see that the directive and achievement oriented leadership styles, with a lack of focus on supportive or participative leadership employed by the managers at the branch in Dominica led to dissatisfaction amongst their employees. In contrast the employees of the Scotia Bank branch from the British Virgin Islands had a far more favorable outlook when it came to job satisfaction as a result of the employment of participative and supportive leadership styles in conjunction with the manager’s achievement oriented and directive styles. We can see from the results of the survey and the supporting analysis...

Words: 2873 - Pages: 12

Path Goal Theory

...Abstract In this paper, I will define the product harm crisis and identify the factors that contribute to a product harm crisis. I will compare and contrast the findings of the various studies on the product harm crisis. I conclude by synthesizing my analysis of the research to develop and support a recommendation for an organization handling a product harm crisis. Product-Harm Defined Product-harm crisis can be defined as an occasion when a product or brand is faulty, substandard, contaminated or dangerous to the general public. The crisis could have an effect on the whole product category or a subset of the group. In most instances, this crisis prompts a product recall on a voluntary basis by the organization or forced by external regulators. In today's market, product-harm crises are often global events. The short-term consequences of a product harm crises are lost revenues and the expenses associated with product recalls. The long-term effect of these crises is damaged reputation to the affected brand and organization. The key challenge for organizations confronted with a product harm crisis is to restore consumer confidence. Examples of Product-Harm An example of this product harm crisis involved Kraft Foods Australia‘s peanut butter division. Kraft was notified of a possible link between its peanut butter and salmonella poison outbreak. This brand of peanut butter was recalled and removed from stores. Business Reviews Weekly...

Words: 1383 - Pages: 6

Path Goal Theory

...Introduction Leadership is a dynamic relationship based on mutual influence and common purpose between leaders and collaborators in which both are moved to higher levels of motivation and moral development as they affect real, intended change. Three important parts of this definition are the terms relationship, mutual, and collaborators. Relationship is the connection between people. Mutual means shared in common. Collaborators cooperate or work together. This definition of leadership says that the leader is influenced by the collaborators while they work together to achieve an important goal. This paper however, focused on a specific theory of leadership and its importance for the organization’s success. The Path-Goal Theory of Leadership The path-goal theory postulates that the most successful leaders are those who increase subordinate motivation by charting out and clarifying the paths to high performance. According to Robert House’s path-goal theory, effective leaders:  Motivate their followers to achieve group and organizational goals  Make sure that they have control over outcomes their subordinates desire  Reward subordinates for performing at a high level or achieving their goals by giving them desired outcomes  Raise their subordinates’ beliefs about their ability to achieve their work goals and perform at a high level  Take into account their subordinates’ characteristics and the type of work they do...

Words: 1154 - Pages: 5

Path Goal Theory

...Assignment 7 Q. 1: Path-Goal Theory (Directive, Supportive, Participative, or Achievement- Oriented) 1. (a) Directive leadership is the only choice because the structure is poor and the employees are neither active nor experienced. They need proper guidelines, someone to set the proper performance standards, and to know what is expected of them. 2. (b) Supportive leadership due to the situational factors chart on page 255. I feel like any employee that is inexperienced and passive need a directive style of leadership even if they are placed in a stable environment. I feel like both supportive and directive styles would be necessary in this scenario. 3. (c) Supportive leadership due to the situational factors chart on page 255. I personally feel like a directive leadership behavior is in need here as the employees follow directions well but lack experience and need some guidance. 4. (d) Supportive leadership is the best choice for a simple task as these employees just need reassurance that leadership cares about their well-being and needs. 5. (e) Directive leadership is the best fit. Even though the workers are experienced and active followers a directive style will help lay out guidelines and what each employee’s duty should be to meet the performance standards. 6. (f) An empowered team employee has the authority and responsibility to make decisions, rather than needing to get approval from above, and each teammate has a voice in group...

Words: 901 - Pages: 4

Path Goal and Expectancy Theory

... it represents a reward in the follower's mind, drives the motivational state. Thus, leaders must consistently ensure that promises made are fulfilled. Leaders cannot afford a loss of credibility in the eyes of their followers. Leadership means stepping forward and taking the time to motivate each follower on a personal basis, according to the principles of the model of expectancy theory. But if the leader is unwilling to expend this effort they are denying those around the benefits of potential contributions arising from the leader’s ability to influence, to achieve the outcomes of the vision, and in the long run, choosing to forego opportunities of growth. It is challenging to adapt and analyze various components of the theories in real world situations. Both theories need to be applied together. Practically it may not be easy for leaders (in the context of a manager) to pick and choose a theory that applies at all times. This requires extremely dynamic, skilled and flexible managers. Many of our leaders can be identified as an Expectancy Theory style of leadership. If Leaders applied the path-goal theory with their employees they would see an increase in work performance and job satisfaction....

Words: 437 - Pages: 2

It Is Said That Many Companies Are over Managed and Under Led. Define Leadership and Explain What the Path-Goal Theory of Leadership Is. Identify the Four Leadership Styles of Path-Goal Theory and Explain When They Are Most Appropriately Used.

... kinds of situation perfectly and precisely like over-managed or lack of leading and trust. In my opinion, a successful leader is important to have multiple leadership styles when the company is facing over-control and over-managed or misleading. It is because different situation of over-led or lack of leading will need different leadership styles to manage it. This is why we need to use path-goal theory to identify which leadership style is suitable in your current company situation. If the leader uses the wrong leadership style to manage the company, it will cause the company to over-managed and even worst when leader do not want to change the leading progress. This will lead the company to go bankrupt. Hence, all leadership styles are important for leaders. They must have the ability to solve the problem using leadership styles precisely in different situation....

Words: 1328 - Pages: 6

Path Goal Theory

... current Path-Goal Theory. This theory does not encompass Kelleher's style, but a few similarities are evident. Within Path-Goal Theory, there are four defined leadership behaviors. Two of them, supportive and participative, describe Kelleher's style. A supportive leader is a friendly leader and shows a genuine concern for the work-related and personal needs of his/her subordinates. The participative leader consults with his/her subordinates and utilizes their suggestions before making decisions. Kelleher practices both of these behaviors daily. He develops a personal relationship with as many of Southwest's employees as possible. At the very least, he knows their name. He becomes more than just their boss, he becomes a friend. Also, in dealing with all decision making, Kelleher uses the information provided by his employees emphatically before making a decision. He feels that the employees actually dealing with the problem would have a much better idea of how to handle it than most upper management would. Lastly, Kelleher can be described as being a charismatic leader. A charismatic leader inspires people to place the needs of their company as high as their personal needs and has an extraordinary effect on his/her followers. Charismatic leaders are extremely self-confident, have visions of the future and behave in extraordinary ways. Kelleher exemplifies these qualities. His self confidence shows in his ability to take chances in changing the face of the airline industry...

Words: 957 - Pages: 4