Free Essay

Jean Baptiste Say

In: Business and Management

Submitted By andreiptr
Words 4876
Pages 20
Jean Baptiste Say

Economic Doctrines

Agenda 1. Introduction 2.1. J.B.Say in the french Classical Liberalism school of thought 2.2. Mainstream of the Classical Liberalism school of economics 2.3. Specifics of J.B.Say 2.4. Differences regarding the opposition of Classical Liberalism 2. Description of J.B.Say 3. New approach brought by J.B.Say 4. Opinion 5. Summary

1. Introduction 1.1. J.B.Say in the french Classical Liberalism school of thought
Jean Baptiste Say was a French economist and businessman. He had classical liberal views and argued in favor of competition, free trade and lifting restraints on business. He is best known due to Say's Law , which is named after him and at times credited to him, but while he discussed and popularized it, he did not originate it. 1.2. Mainstream of the Classical Liberalism school of economics
Classical liberalism is a political philosophy and ideology belonging to liberalism in which primary emphasis is placed on securing the freedom of the individual by limiting the power of the government. The philosophy emerged as a response to the Industrial Revolution and urbanization in the 19th century in Europe and the United States. It advocates civil liberties with a limited government under the rule of law, private property and belief in the laissez-faire economic policy. Classical liberalism is built on ideas that had already arisen by the end of the 18th century, such as selected ideas of Adam Smith, John Locke, Jean Baptiste Say, Thomas Malthus and David Ricardo. It drew on a psychological understanding of individual liberty, the contradictory theories of natural law and utilitarism, and a belief in progress.
Core beliefs of classical liberals included new ideas - which departed from both the older conservative idea of society as a family and from later sociological concept of society as a complex set of social network - that individuals were "egoistic, coldly calculating, essentially inert and atomistic" and that society was no more than the sum of its individual members.
These beliefs were complemented by a belief that "labor", for instance individuals without capital, can only be motivated by fear of hunger and by a reward, while "men of higher rank" can be motivated by ambition, as well. This led politicians at the time to pass the Poor Law Amendment Act, which limited the provision of social assistance, because classical liberals believed in "an unfettered market" as the mechanism that will mot efficiently lead to a nation's wealth. Adopting Thomas Malthus' population theory, they saw poor urban conditions as inevitable, as they believed population growth would outstrip food production and they considered that to be desirable, as starvation would help limit population growth. They opposed any income or wealth redistribution, which they believed would be dissipated by the lowest orders.
Drawing on selected ideas of Adam Smith, classical liberals believed that all individuals are able to equally freely pursue their own economic self-interest, without government direction, serving the common good. They were critical of the welfare state as interfering in a free market. They criticized labor’s group rights being pursued at the expense of individual rights, while they accepted big corporations' rights as being pursued at the expense of inequality of bargaining power.
It was not until emergence of social liberalism that child labor was forbidden, minimum standards of worker safety were introduced, a minimum wage and old age pensions were established, and financial institutions regulations with the goal of fighting cyclic depressions, monopolies and cartels were introduced. They were met by classical liberalism as an unjust interference of the state.
They believed that rights are of a negative nature which requires other individuals (and governments) to refrain from interfering with free market, whereas social liberalism believes labor has a right to be provided with certain benefits or services via taxes paid by corporations.
Core beliefs of classical liberals also included their belief against direct democracy where law is made by majority vote by citizens because "there is nothing in the bare idea of majority rule to show that majorities will always respect the rights of property or maintain rule of law.

1.3. Specifics of J.B. Say Jean-Baptiste Say was a French economist who introduced Adam Smith's economic theories into France and whose commentaries on Smith were read in both France and Britain. Say challenged Smith's labor theory of value, believing that prices were determined by utility and also emphasized the critical role of the entrepreneur in the economy. However neither of those observations became accepted by British economists at the time. His most important contribution to economic thinking was Say's law, which was interpreted by classical economists that there could be no overproduction in a market, and that there would always be a balance between supply and demand. This general belief influenced government policies until the 1930s. Following this law, since the economic cycle was seen as self-correcting, government did not intervene during periods of economic hardship because it was seen as futile. 1.4. Differences regarding the opposition of Classical Liberalism a
The Fascist leader Benito Mussolini opposed classical liberalism: "Against individualism, the Fascist conception is for the State. It is opposed to classical Liberalism, which arose from the necessity of reacting against absolutism, and which brought its historical purpose to an end when the State was transformed into the conscience and will of the people. Liberalism denied the State in the interests of the particular individual; Fascism reaffirms the State as the true reality of the individual."
French economist J. B. Say is most commonly identified with Say’s Law, which states that supply creates its own demand. Over the years Say’s Law has been embroiled in two kinds of controversy - the first over its authorship, the second over what it means and, given each meaning, whether it is true.

2. Description of J.B.Say
Say was the best-known expositor of Adam Smith's views in Europe and America. His Traité d’économie politique was translated into English and used as a textbook in England and the United States. But Say did not agree with Adam Smith on everything. In particular, he took issue with Smith’s labor theory of value. Say was one of the first economists to have the insight that the value of a good derives from its utility to the user and not from the labor spent in producing it.
Say was born in Lyons. During his life he edited a journal, operated a cotton factory, and served as a member of the Tribunate under the Consulate of Napoleon. He was the first to teach a public course on political economy in France and continued his stay in academia first at the Conservatoire des Arts et Métiers, and then at the College de France in Paris. Say was a friend of Thomas Robert Malthus and David Ricardo.
Say's approach to economics is, in philosophical terms, that of a realist and an essentialist. He combines a healthy skepticism regarding the usefulness of statistical investigations with an emphasis on observing the facts of reality. A statistical description "does not indicate the origin and consequences of the facts it has collected". For Say, only a causal analysis based on the essential natures of the entities involved can achieve that end, and such an analysis is the core task of political economy. He sees economics as a genuine science capable of establishing "absolute truths", but insists that it "has only become a science since it has been confined to the results of inductive investigation". In fact, Say declares that political economy "forms a part of experimental science" and is, thus, rather similar to chemistry and natural philosophy.
Taxonomically, he divides all facts into (a) those that refer to objects and (b) those that refer to events or interactions. The former is the domain of descriptive science (e.g., botany); while the latter is the domain of experimental science (e.g., chemistry or physics).
Above all, Say seeks to be practical; for "[n]othing can be more idle than the opposition of theory to practice!". To that end, he attempts always to employ language that is precise and yet as simple as possible, so that any literate, reasonably intelligent person can comprehend his meaning. For Say, as for most modern Austrians, economics is not a shadowy realm to be penetrated only by the expert, but a subject of enormous practical importance accessible to all. It is thus no surprise to find that Say, in keeping with such a goal of lucidity and intelligibility, criticizes Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations for being "destitute of method," obscure, vague, and disjointed as well as for containing too many long and distracting digressions on topics such as war, education, history, and politics. 3. New approach brought by J.B.Say

3.1. Money and Banking
Say's discussion of money opens with what is now a standard argument about the "double coincidence of wants" problem and how a medium of exchange solves it. His explanation of how one highly demanded commodity spontaneously evolves into an accepted exchange medium is reminiscent of Carl Menger's more famous treatment of the same issue, although it predates Menger by almost seventy years. Historically, money appears due to self-interest, not government decree, and its form should be left to the interaction of consumers’ preferences. "[C]ustom, therefore, and not the mandate of authority, designates the specific product that shall pass exclusively as money."
He then reviews the list of properties a medium of exchange should (ideally) possess: durability, portability, divisibility, high purchasing power per unit, and uniformity. From this presentation, Say draws the familiar conclusion that the precious metals (gold and silver) are excellent choices as monetary substances. In other words, if individuals are left free to choose, it is highly likely that they will choose commodity money (specie). While it is true that Say is a strong proponent of gold and silver as money, it is provocative to notice that he does allow for the possibility that they could be replaced by something else if "new and rich veins of ore should be discovered." In short, Say is not unalterably wedded to the proposition that "money" means gold or silver. However, if money consists of precious metal coinage, then he does agree that monetary units, such as the dollar, should be renamed in terms of the mass of gold or silver contained in the coin. For example, if a coin denominated as one French franc is supposed to contain 5 grams of silver, then it should be named "5 grams of silver," not "one franc.
According to Say, the only justifiable intervention by the State into monetary matters is the minting of coins. In fact, Say thought this should be monopolized by the State "because there would probably be more difficulty in detecting the frauds of private issuers." In particular, in any system in which gold and silver coexisted as monetary metals, governments should studiously avoid setting an official exchange rate between the two, contrary to what was done in historical episodes of bimetallism. Say clearly understood why the practice under bimetallism always led to disaster. That is, the officially overpriced money drove the officially underpriced money out of circulation, a principle known as Gresham's Law. Say emphatically states that money is ruled by supply and demand, just like all commodities. Money's purchasing power "rises and falls in proportion to the relative demand and supply." Therefore, exchange rates between gold coinage and silver coinage should be allowed to change with market conditions. Say seems to favor a "parallel" metallic system, much like that suggested by Murray Rothbard.
With regard to banking, Say distinguishes between "banks of deposit" and "banks of circulation," but treats them both as legitimate institutions. The former function as warehouses for money. They hold one-hundred-percent reserves at all times, and provide convenience as well as security in that they effect transactions on behalf of their depositors by transferring funds from one customer's account to another's, for which services they charge a fee. The latter function as true financial intermediaries. They hold fractional reserves, issue banknotes, and generate an interest income by discounting promissory notes and bills of exchange. The banknotes issued by such institutions must be backed by specie or short-term securities, but if so, then "[t]he holders of the notes of a bank issuing convertible money run little or no risk, so long as the bank is well administered, and independent of the government." In fact, Say even argues that these fractional-reserve-holding banks of circulation bestow a benefit upon society because they provide "the advantage of economizing capital, by reducing the amount of the sum kept in reserve." And if it happens that such fractional-reserve banknotes also supplant part of the specie that had been in circulation, then "the functions of the specie, that has been withdrawn, are just as well performed by the paper substituted in its stead."
There are two additional insights on monetary topics that one must not overlook. First, Say emphasizes that as the division of labor extends ever farther, horizontally and vertically, through the society, that is, as individuals specialize ever more, the number and the importance of exchanges will increase. And this requires an identifiable medium of exchange. Briefly put, money is an integral part of the rise of modern civilization. Second, Say agrees with Mises and Rothbard, who insist that any nominal supply of money is "optimal," as long as prices are free to adjust, because any increase or decrease in nominal terms will simply change the purchasing power per unit in inverse proportion. Thus the real money supply will remain the same.

3.2. Say's Law of Markets
On the first controversy, it is clear that Say did invent something like Say’s Law. But the first person actually to use the words “supply creates its own demand” appears to have been James Mill, the father of John Stuart Mill.
Say’s Law has various interpretations. The long-run version is that there cannot be overproduction of goods in general for a very long time because those who produce the goods, by their act of producing, produce the purchasing power to buy other goods. Say wrote: “How could it be possible that there should now be bought and sold in France five or six times as many commodities as in the miserable reign of Charles VI? With this statement Say had the long run in mind. Certainly the long-run version is correct. Given enough time, supply does create its own demand. There can be no long-run glut of goods.
But Say also said that even in the short run there could be no overproduction of goods relative to demand. It was this short-run version that Thomas Robert Malthus attacked in the nineteenth century and John Maynard Keynes attacked in the twentieth. They were right to attack it.
Without question, the one thing for which Say is best known is "Say's Law," also referred to as his theory of markets (la theorie des debouches) or law of markets (loi des debouches). This principle was, and still is, one of the key building blocks of the classical school of economics. It remains, in some guise or other, essential to any defense of free markets. Moreover, all collectivists attempt to refute it in the course of their assault on liberty and the free society. And yet, some writers have questioned the profundity of Say's Law. Alexander Gray refers to "this theory, which perhaps does not come to much." Even Murray Rothbard calls it a "relatively minor facet of his [Say's] thought."
Most textbooks truncate Say's Law into the transparently false proposition "supply creates its own demand." At minimum, this should be given as "aggregate supply creates its own aggregate demand," because the claim is not that the production of commodity X necessarily results in an equivalent demand for X, but that the production of X leads to demand for commodities A, B, C, and so forth. The production, or supply, of commodities (and complementary services) in general leads to the consumption of, or demand for, commodities (and complementary services) in general. It is certainly possible for there to exist either a shortage or a surplus of any particular commodity, but general overproduction or general underproduction can be no more than momentary phenomena. "It is because the production of some commodities has declined, that all other commodities are superabundant," and such maladjusted production results from "some violent means . . . a political or natural convulsion." Left to its own devices, the market will correct such imbalances.
Say identifies two means by which the corrective process operates. Principally, he argues that, though individuals do save part of the income derived from production, as long as those savings are reinvested in "productive employment," in the aggregate there need be no decreases in production, income, or consumption. This process of reinvestment is fueled by differences in the profits earned by entrepreneurs. Those goods that are relatively more scarce, and thus rising in price, attract additional investment, while those that are relatively less scarce, and thus falling in price, discourage investment. And even if one hoards money or buries it, "the ultimate object is always to employ it in a purchase of some kind," so there still cannot be deficient demand as long as real economic values are being produced. In order for consumers to exist, there must first be producers.
Throughout his discussion of production and consumption, Say consistently maintains that money is merely a neutral conduit through which aggregate supply is translated into aggregate demand, or "money is but the agent of the transfer of values." There seems to be no recognition of the transmission mechanism by which changes in the supply of money alter the relative prices of goods and, thereby, redirect the entire interrelated structure of production. From a modern Austrian perspective, Say's failure to grasp the non-neutrality of money must be deemed a deficiency of some note.
On the other hand, Say eloquently expresses a clear understanding that it is wholly beneficial for a society to experience generally falling prices whenever such declining prices are the result of productivity gains. Not only does this circumstance indicate, contrary to popular belief, "that a country is rich and plentiful," but also that "products formerly within reach of the rich alone have been made accessible to almost every class of society." Moreover, Say correctly perceives that (a) the prices of goods reflect their utility to the buyer, (b) the prices of the factors of production are derived or "imputed" from the prices of the goods produced, and therefore (c) costs of production represent an interface between the utility of the good and the productivity of the factors of production.

3.3. Enterpreneurs, Capital and Interest
Rothbard has suggested that the world of economics should bestow blessings upon Say for reintroducing the entrepreneur into economic thought, and so it should. With pen and ink, Adam Smith made the entrepreneur invisible. J.B. Say brings him back to life and to the center of the stage. What do these entrepreneurs do? They use their "industry" (a term Say prefers to "labor") to organize and direct the factors of production so as to achieve the "satisfaction of human wants."
But they are not merely managers. They are forecasters, project appraisers, and risk-takers as well. Out of their own financial capital, or that borrowed from someone else, they advance funds to the owners of labor, natural resources ("land"), and machinery ("tools"). These payments, or "rents," are recouped only if the entrepreneurs succeed in selling the product to consumers. Entrepreneurial success is not only sought after by the individual, but also essential to the society as a whole. "[A] country well stocked with intelligent merchants, manufacturers, and agriculturists has more powerful means of attaining prosperity, than one devoted chiefly to the pursuit of the arts and sciences."
Say's use of the word "capital" can be confusing, because it is used to mean, as the context requires, either (a) capital goods that are integral to the production of further, final goods, or (b) the financial capital that constitutes the enterprise's funding. The former are the result of some earlier production process and, when combined with the industry of the entrepreneur, generate profit (or loss). The latter is the result of saving some portion of the income from past productive activity and generates interest.
The analysis of interest rates is very perceptive and, in most respects, remarkably Austrian. First, Say realizes that the interest rate is not the price of money, but the price of credit, or "capital lent." Therefore, it is false that "the abundance or scarcity of money regulates the rate of interest." Of course, Say is thinking of the real rate of interest, not the nominal, or market, rate. He also clearly sees that interest rates will include some risk premium as a sort of insurance to protect against loss due to default. Such a risk premium will become very large when, for example, laws are imposed so that creditors have no legal recourse against a debtor who defaults. Furthermore, Say identifies the fact that there are "political risk" differentials between nations that lead to an international array of nominal interest rates. Overall, in terms of public policy, Say adopts the same stance with regard to credit markets that he exhibits elsewhere: namely, the state should not meddle. The "rate of interest ought no more to be restricted, or determined by law, than . . . the price of wine, linen, or any other commodity."
It has been argued that the one glaring flaw in Say's understanding of interest rates is his failure to anchor them on the bedrock of "time preferences," that is, to explain interest rates as founded on the rate at which individuals prefer to trade present goods for future goods. While Say does indeed fail explicitly to connect interest rates with time preferences, he seems to possess at least an embryonic notion of time preference itself. He observes, for instance, that there often exists an "inducement to every one to consume the whole of his income . . . [during] times of political turbulence and confusion." And when discussing the impact of increased frugality (a falling rate of time preference?) on the accumulation of capital, he even concludes that "the low rate of interest proves the existence of more abundant capital."

3.4. Value and Utility
For Say, the foundation of value is utility or the capacity of a good or service to satisfy some human desire. Those desires and the preferences, expectations, and customs that lie behind them must be taken as givens, as data, by the analyst. The task is to reason from those data. Say is most emphatic in denying the claims of Adam Smith, David Ricardo, and others that the basis for value is labor, or "productive agency." Economists who subscribe to a labor theory of value have the matter precisely backwards. "[I]t is the ability to create the utility . . . that gives value to productive agency."
The two categories of value are "exchange-value" and "use-value." Exchange-value lies within the domain of economics, because it is a measure of what one must give up in order to acquire a good in the market. In economic terms, "[t]he only fair criterion of the value of an object is, the quantity of other commodities at large, that can be readily obtained for it in exchange." Those things which possess exchange-value would today be called "economic goods," but Say calls them "social wealth." In contrast, some things, such as air, water, and sunlight, possess only use-value, because they are present in such abundance that they cannot command a price. These are now known as "free goods," but Say labels them "natural wealth."
Unfortunately, by adhering to the above taxonomy of values, Say plunges into a most regrettable error. He concludes that since the measure of a good's economic value is literally and precisely its market price, then all market transactions must involve the exchange of equal values. This, of course, must imply that neither buyer nor seller gains. Or, in other words, all market transactions are a "zero-sum game." "When Spanish wine is bought at Paris, equal value is really given for equal value: the silver paid, and the wine received, are worth one the other." Austrians are adamant in maintaining that exchanges, as long as they are voluntary, must be mutually beneficial in terms of the expected utilities of each the buyer and the seller. If that is not the case, then why would buyer and seller agree to trade?

3.5. Taxes and the State
Nowhere is Say's radicalism more evident than in his critique of government intervention into the economy. Most succinctly stated, he declares that self-interest and the search for profits will push entrepreneurs toward satisfying consumer demand. "[T]he nature of the products is always regulated by the wants of society," therefore "legislative interference is superfluous altogether."
Say's comment on one particular series of legislative acts is very instructive. The first of the British Navigation Acts was passed in 1581; these Acts were strengthened in 1651 and 1660; and the last was not repealed until 1849. Their purpose was to reserve Britain's international trade exclusively for the ship-owners of the British merchant marine. Say argues that such monopolization of the "carrying trade" diminishes national wealth because it often reduces the profits of those merchants shipping their goods to market.
He recognizes that defenders of such statutes may grant this, but still insist that the restrictions are justified on the grounds of national security. Say retorts that this is so only if "it is an advantage to one nation to domineer over others. . . . The love of domination never attains more than a factitious elevation, that is sure to make enemies of all its neighbors. It is this that engenders national debt, internal abuse, tyranny and revolution; while the sense of mutual interest begets international kindness, extends the sphere of useful intercourse, and leads to a prosperity, permanent, because it is natural."
The foregoing reveals how well Say comprehends the proposition that free trade and peace go hand in hand.
As for taxation, Say divides it into two types. Direct taxes are those levied on income or wealth. Indirect taxes are those such as sales taxes, excise taxes, and tariffs. Regardless of its specific form or method of collection, "all taxation may be said to injure reproduction, inasmuch as it prevents the accumulation of productive capital." Therefore, contrary to what some economists have claimed, "[i]t is a glaring absurdity to pretend, that taxation . . . enriches the nation by consuming part of its wealth."
Today, one will find many writers who insist that high rates of taxation, and the concomitant high levels of government spending, somehow cause a society to be more prosperous. Naturally, Say knows this to be false, despite the fact that, from a statistical standpoint, prosperity and taxation may be positively correlated. He explains that such assertions commit the error of reversing cause and effect. That is, "[a] man is not rich, because he pays largely; but he is able to pay largely, because he is rich." Prosperous nations, if they remain prosperous, do so despite heavy tax burdens, not because of them. Anyone who reads Say's Treatise should not overlook the fact that the discussion of taxes and government appears in the section headed "consumption." That is no accident, for Say does not hesitate to identify government spending as "unproductive consumption." And "[e]xcessive taxation is a kind of suicide."
4. Opinion
In my opinion, I find it to be true that Say either overlooked or misunderstood certain points of theory dear to the hearts of Austrian economists. He does not believe that market exchanges represent utility gains for both buyer and seller; he does not see the relationship between interest rates and time preference; he offers no theory of business cycles. On the other hand, he is cognizant of the limitations of statistical investigations; he is very much in favor of commodity money and free banking; he knows that entrepreneurs and the accumulation of capital are essential to economic advancement; he correctly identifies both government regulation and taxation as threats to prosperity, indeed, even as threats to civil society itself.
Also, I believe that Jean-Baptiste Say has much to offer any reader, whether Austrian or not, whether an economist or not. He saw many important truths with clarity, and wrote of them with passion and lucidity. Say once called economics "this beautiful, and above all, useful science." He left economics both more beautiful and more useful than he had found it. 5. Summary

Jean Baptiste Say was one of the most representative figures of french Classical Liberalism. He is best known for his work on Say’s Law of Markets and for publishing Traité d’économie politique, which was used as a textbook in several countries around the world. Though bairly credited for his work, Say has brought a valuable input to classical liberalism economics on the one handand to modern economics on the other.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Evolution

...The past and also modern day paradigms associated with the field of biology are generally uniquely placed by the idea associated with development. Obviously, the development can be acknowledged with uniting biological fields such as paleontology, inherited genes and also microbiology. Moreover, development provides an elaborate justification for the lifetime of the Earth’s huge diversity plus the origins of the above five thousand types associated with plant and also animal life. For this stop, development can be particularly discussed by simply several theories. Obviously, the pre Darwinian advocates such as John Usher sophisticated the creationism type associated with development (Ruse & Travis, 2009). Your formation idea associated with development theorized how the limitless life types within the Soil had been manufactured by The almighty. Moreover, the formation idea can be of the viewpoint that each life types include remained unchanged given that formation. Thus, high of the seventeenth and also eighteenth one hundred year the field of biology in The european union dedicated to the outline associated with animals and also crops with no justification on what they reached currently being. Carolus Linnaeus can be hailed like a top notch scientist whom created the category system pertaining to figuring out existing items. For this stop, Linnaeus recognized animals and also crops determined by modalities associated with imitation and also looks. Obviously, Linnaeus......

Words: 1177 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

None

...these tunes share the name of the associated dance. The terms minuet, sarabande, gigue (or jig), bourée, rigaudon, gavotte, courante, chaconne or passacaille may be mentioned in the context of music. All of these terms are dances which are all examples of baroque dances. Jean-Baptiste Lande taught this dance at a school he established. Although unintentional, King Louis XIV influenced the dance as well. In practice the style originated in France and was mainly influenced the European upper classes. The dance was popular and spread across Europe. Spain, England, and others embraced the forms of dance. King Louis XIV influenced society through his passion for dance which led to the establishment of the Academie Royale de la Danse in 1661. The young King Louis XIV employed dance as a weapon of State. As he was famous for his control over his court he encouraged them in social pursuits of the dance while effectively diverting the nobility from threatening his authority. King Louis XIV hired a man by the name of Giovanni Baptista Lulli (Jean-Baptiste Lully) for his work with ballet in France. Jean Baptiste was responsible for composing the ballets for the king's court. The ballets and operas composed by Jean-Baptiste Lully drove the point home in propagandistic prologues praising Louis XIV as...

Words: 974 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Article Review

...Ramifications on Life in the 21st Century is an article by Dr. Terry Mortenson. He discusses a well know debate that goes back many years. He mentions three French scientists, Comte de Buffon(1708-88), Pierre Laplace(1749-1827), Jean Lamarck(1744-1829), and how they were involved in the development of theories without the involvement of God. He defends his arguments with the mentioning of the four scriptural geologist, George Young(1777-1848), George Fairholme(1789-1846), John Murray(1786?-1851), William Rhind(1797-1874)(Mortenson, 2003) . Strengths: I think Dr. Terry Mortenson makes very good points in his article, with great detail. He mentions the French scientists, and give a brief overview of what they brought to the table. “Three French scientists were prominent in this development. In Epochs of Nature (1778), Comte de Buffon (1708–88), postulated that the earth was the result of a collision between a comet and the sun and had gradually cooled from a molten lava state over at least 78,000 years. Pierre Laplace (1749–1827) published his nebular hypothesis in Exposition of the System of the Universe (1796). He imagined that the solar system had naturally and gradually condensed from a gas cloud during an indefinite but very long period of time. Jean Lamarck (1744–1829), in his Zoological Philosophy (1809), proposed a theory...

Words: 618 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Louis 14th, Lully, Moliere

...Great Impact of a King on music and theatre Sinan Erk Mutafoğlu 11149 HUM 204 Prof. Filiz Ali December 2nd, 2011 In the 17th century, France witnessed political, social and artistic facts which were triggered by the relationships between Louis the Fourteenth, Jean-Baptiste Lully and Moliere. This relationship between these important figures of 17th century can also be delineated as the connection between the political power, music and theatre. Before emphasizing the interaction among them, it might be illuminating to specify their backgrounds in order to gain an insight about their relations. Following, I am going to specify on their relationships and their influences on French music and theatre. Louis the 14th, who is named as France’s Sun King, had the longest reign in European history beginning from 1643 until he dies in 1715. He had only five years old when he became the king of France, therefore the reign was almost dominated by the Cardinal until he died in 1661 ( Louis XIV, David J. Sturdy, pg 23 ). Following the cardinal’s death, Louis brought the absolute monarchy at the risk of taking both his mother’s and the council’s reactions (Louis XIV, David J.Sturdy, pg 34). Afterward, these reactions were also gravitated to the relation between Louis, Lully and Moliere. He established Versailles palace...

Words: 1670 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Mercantilism

...Mercantilism is a collection of governmental policies that are designed to regulate economic activity for the state or country. In the 17th and 18th century, a country’s power was measured by it’s wealth, more specifically their gold supply. Resources were scarce and trade had a limit. From 1600-1800 many different economic policies and institutions strove to enrich the state. In france, King Louis XIV’s chief master, Colbert, became a leading patron in mercantilism. Colbert recommended a balance of trade for France. His goal was to make France self-sufficient because he believed that trade let to problems within nations. He used state and support from existing and new industries to achieve the self-sufficiency. For example, Colbert granted privileges to luxury industries to encourage growth, and he granted special privileges to foreign craftsmen willing to move to France. In order to improve the communication and transportation of trade, Colbert undertook work projects in France. He also placed high tariffs on imported goods in order to reduce competition. He also created a powerful merchant marine for transporting French goods. The British relied highly on their colonial empire to promote economic growth within the restrictions of mercantilist thought. The Navigation Acts was established in 1651 and remained in act until 1786. In Britain, Merchants and shipowners a monopoly on trade with their colonies. Colonists had to use british ships for their goods and were expected...

Words: 458 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Bernier

...During the 17th century Louis XIV of France sought to strengthen the power of the monarchy in France and to enhance France’s position in world politics. In 1664 Jean Colbert, his finance minister, established the French East India Company to develop French trade with India. Besides providing information on India for Colbert, Francois Bernier’s observations on sati influenced generations of Europeans. Educated first in physiology and later in medicine at the University of Montpellier, Bernier (1620-1688) considered himself a modern man of science. In 1658 he sailed for Surat on the west coast of India and by March 1659 he joined the entourage of Dara Shukoh, a imperial Mughal prince, as his personal physician and wrote a vivid account of the succession war among Dara Shukoh and his brothers for the Mughal throne. He then produced several long letters about economic conditions and religious and social customs in northern India. The excerpt below is from his letter dated October 4, 1667 to Monsieur Jean Chapelain that is entitled “Describing the Superstitions, strange customs, and Doctrines of the Indous or Gentiles [Hindus] of Hindoustan” “From which it will be seen that there is no Doctrine too strange or too improbable for the Soul of man to conceive.” Colbert had employed Chapelain to draw up a list of authors who should be considered for state pensions. The title and subtitle of this letter indicate that as a scientist, Bernier was highly critical of Hindu religious......

Words: 312 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Formal Analysis on the Great Oaks of Old Bas-Breau

...artists to forgo the formalities of art and draw directly from the source of nature rather than a dramatic event in history. The Barbizon School came about in existence due to artists’ rejecting the Royal Academy’s standards for art and tradition in an attempt to portray a truer reality of life with nature. Many of the artists came to the forests of Fontainebleau with loose brushstrokes, tonal qualities and softness of the subjects; they all had the same motif of creating works reflecting rural scenery. Rousseau was the most prominent member of the school and was an activist to protect the forest from deforestation. The Great Oaks of Old Bas-Breau was painted in 1864 on canvas with oil in Barbizon. The painting is exactly what the title says: great oak trees from the forest of Fontainebleau. With the bottom looking like an open field and the background of the oak trees, you will also notice a small figure in the lower right who seems to be a man with a walking stick on a trek through the forest. At the center of the painting there are three main oak trees that draw our attention. These are probably the oldest and most grandiose of the oak trees in the forest. These three are the only visible trees that don’t have gnarled and twisted branches. The walking stick gives off a shadow that falls to the left so that must mean that the source of lighting comes from the right of the man and is not illustrated in the painting. The color palette is very soft. No bright colors and the......

Words: 640 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Existentialism

...Jean-Paul Sartre and Existentialism Jean-Paul Sartre . . . the name is one of the most popular in modern philosophy. But who was he? What did he write and what were his works about? What was his role with regard to Existentialism? What is Existentialism, really? What life influences affected the person as whom he became famous? How would Sartre assess various social topics that we face today? What are the problems with Sartre's view of Existentialism and existence in general? These are the questions addressed in the following pages of this brief dissertation.His life Upon reviewing several sources, it is apparent that Sartre was a very disorganized and inconsistent individual. Sartre was obsessed with his intellect to the point of abandon of all else in his life - personal hygiene, honesty, organization, thoroughness, and more. It seems that he felt he was of superior intelligence in comparison to all others who surrounded him. He was not necessarily a great and original thinker, but rather a superb media sensation of sorts. Rather than developing Existentialist thought, he merely promoted it to amazing popularity through his eccentric lifestyle. Although he is best known for his association with Existentialism, it is interesting to note that he denounced its principles later in life and adopted Marxism, which he also later denounced. Jean-Paul-Charles-Aymard Sartre was born in Paris on June 21, 1905, the only child of Anne-Marie Schweitzer Sartre and Jean-Baptiste Sartre.......

Words: 2585 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

An Essay on Religion

...dramatically shifting from the emphasis on religious doctrine that empowered Europe for centuries. Through this period of Enlightenment, new ideals were reflected amongst European society. Writers, scholars, and philosophers began writing fondly of the world and man’s capacity to understand the world around him without blindly following religion. Instead, people were encouraged to apply rational thoughts to understand nature and guide their human existence. Authors used their unique styles to criticize religion by identifying the pious man as a hypocrite. These different styles working toward similar goals can be seen in the very different expressions of the theme of religion versus rationality in Jean-Baptiste Molière’s Tartuffe and Alexander Pope’s An Essay on Man. Jean-Baptiste Molière, generally considered the greatest French comic playwright of all time, was born into wealth, his family being that of the noble court of Louis XIV. Due to his regal upbringing, Molière was afforded access to the best education of his day, studying under the Jesuits at the College of Claremont. Rather than accepting a position in the court of Louis XIV, Molière chose to pursue a life in the theater instead. A great satirist, Molière’s writing often criticized powerful members of society without fear. Tartuffe, often referred to as his greatest work, was first performed before a court including Louis XIV in 1664 to much controversy. While the king enjoyed the play, the clergymeln......

Words: 1986 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

English Literature Perfume; Suskinds Representation of Grenouille

...How does Suskind present the character of Jean Baptiste Grenouille in the extract Perfume? PP. 248-251 Jean-Baptiste Grenouille, the remorseless and inconceivably complex protagonist of Perfume is first and foremost presented as a narcissistic megalomaniac. In fact, the extract itself describes him as such, ‘in his narcissistic fantasies of old’ and his self-conceitedness is further exemplified when the author states ‘He was even greater than Prometheus.’ The fact that Grenouille see’s himself as comparable (and even better than) to a God helps to give an accurate depiction of his egotistical demeanour. Another example of his vanity is displayed in the title in which he gives himself, ‘Yes, he was Grenouille the Great!’ In this self-styled title he uses the adjective ‘great’ to describe himself, which is a sharp contrast to his typically repeated description by the author of him as being a ‘insignificant’ and ‘solitary tick’, which is repeated throughout the novel that does invoke sympathy from the reader, and yet also stirs disgust as a tick is a foul creature which feeds of another’s blood, or ‘life’, similar to what Grenouille does to the other characters in the novel. There is also something childish and self-indulgent in the way he calls himself ‘Grenouille the Great’, it’s almost endearing, but not as endearing as for the reader to forgive Grenouille of his sins. Grenouille, in these pages especially, is perceived by the reader as a contemptuous misanthrope. ......

Words: 1554 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Ordeal by Hunger Objectivity

...campus. Stewart wrote mostly fiction but ventured into some non-fiction historical work on occasion. Mr. Stewart paints a very descriptive picture of the events as the search party reached the camp. He tells us that as Mr. Cody and Clark reached the first camp, they witnessed sighting Jean Baptiste who was carrying a severed human leg. (Stewart, 1936) Mr. Baptiste, upon sighting Cody and Clark, threw the leg back in the hole that contained the body of Jacob Donner. (Stewart, 1936) Stewart give’s a description of the condition of the body like that of a modern day police report. He describes facts like, the arms and legs are severed, the trunk is sliced open, and the heart and liver are missing. (Stewart, 1936) The book was written in 1936 when writers did not use strong descriptive language like that. I feel Stewart overtly described the scene to draw more attention to the story and sell more books. The descriptions didn’t need to be detailed to the point they were for the reader to understand the story. Stewart’s subjectivity was that of an author describing the story to sell books. In another paragraph Mr. Stewart describes the words of the (housewife) who had claimed Mr. Baptiste was sent to borrow the food referring to the leg like it was a piece of meat purchased at a modern day grocery store. (Stewart, 1936) He could have communicated the story with less gore but he didn’t. In those few paragraphs I felt like I was listening to a carnival barter trying...

Words: 738 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Until I Die (Copy)

...Until I Die ONE I LEAPT, DRAWING MY FEET UP BENEATH ME, AS the seven-foot quarterstaff smashed into the flagstones where I had been standing a half second before. Landing in a crouch, I sprang back up, groaning with the effort, and swung my own weapon over my head. Sweat dripped into my eye, blinding me for one stinging second before my reflexes took over and forced me into motion. A shaft of light from a window far overhead illuminated the oaken staff as I arced it down toward my enemy’s legs. He swept sideways, sending my weapon flying through the air. It crashed with a wooden clang against the stone wall behind me. Defenseless, I scrambled for a sword that lay a few feet away. But before I could grab it, I was snatched off my feet in a powerful grasp and crushed against my assailant’s chest. He held me a few inches off the ground as I kicked and flailed, adrenaline pumping like quicksilver through my body. “Don’t be such a sore loser, Kate,” chided Vincent. Leaning forward, he gave me a firm kiss on the lips. The fact that he was shirtless was quickly eroding my hard-won concentration. And the warmth from his bare chest and arms was turning my fight-tensed muscles to buttery goo. Struggling to maintain my resolve, I growled, “That is totally cheating,” and managed to work my hand free enough to punch him in the arm. “Now let me go.” “If you promise not to kick or bite.” He laughed and set me on the ground. Sea blue eyes flashed with humor from under the waves of......

Words: 86302 - Pages: 346

Premium Essay

Lucy Vs Aquinas

...People would rather believe in a different ontological explanation. When presented the concept of evolution, certain philosophers refute it and claim the idea of creation. Thomas Aquinas is a philosopher who believed in creation of man by a supreme being, God. In his most famous work, Summa Theologica, Aquinas gives five proofs of the existence of God through the five senses. In this novel, Aquinas also declared that God made every human being and every soul individually. He argues that God can bring something nonexistent into existence. Aquinas says that God does not simply change one existing thing into another but creates things into...

Words: 1019 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Econ

...about the history of economics more then anything. America is a country founded on the hard work of people who felt that England was not the right place to be at the current time period. Bring with them though was one of the most important aspects of our country that we still have today, and this is a capitalist economy. Another thing that I learned from the reading was that France and England both based their economies around the same aspect, which is that of a capitalist economy, and that having the most money was the only measuring tool of how your economy is doing. And this is reaffirmed by Jean-Baptiste Colbert who states “Everyone… Agrees that the might and greatness of a state is measured entirely by the quantity of silver it possesses” meaning that Jean had the right idea of economics he just need to fine tune his idea. To fine tune this idea of “the most money is the winner” Jean Colbert had to look across the English channel at their biggest enemies of the day. Standing in their way of world dominance was that of the mighty British Empire, the same empire that would form the bed rock of the country that we love today, America. England had a similar way of approaching their economy, and that was in a way of more of a free market society. While France used more of a mercantile economy, where the...

Words: 898 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Two of the Video Review

...In the ancient Western World, nature of society, the family, government and politics, religion, ideals and values of that period were all facing great changes. Thus, there were many specific people and things emerging in that special period. "ANTIGONE" and "The King is Dancing" are two wonderful videos which can show those changes in ancient Western World.    First of all, I will talk about the "ANTIGONE". It is a video that can give us some information of ancient Greek. Polyneices and Eteocles, two brothers leading opposite sides in Thebes' civil war, have both been killed in battle. Creon, the new ruler of Thebes, has declared that Eteocles will be honored and Polyneices disgraced. The rebel brother's body will not be sanctified by holy rites, and will lay unburied to become the food of carrion animals. Antigone and Ismene are the sisters of the dead brothers. Antigone wants to bury Polyneices' body, in defiance of Creon's edict. Ismene refuses to help her, fearing the death penalty, but she is unable to dissuade Antigone from going to do the deed by herself. A Sentry enters, fearfully reporting that the body has been buried to Creon. When, Creon knows Antigone do that, he is very angry, and imprisons Antigone in a cave. Antigone is fiancee of Creon's son. Therefore, his son kills himself after he begged his father but did not success. Creon's wife knows her son's dead feels very sad, and kills herself, too. At that time, Creon blames himself for everything that has......

Words: 1327 - Pages: 6