Free Essay

John Deere and Complex Parts

In: Business and Management

Submitted By nbrower23
Words 695
Pages 3
Case # 2 – John Deere and Complex Parts Inc.
Key Facts * Net Sales for John Deere were over $19 billion * Net assets of more than $34 Billion * Complex parts was supplier for more than 10 years * Supplied Deere with a key manufacturing part requiring significant engineering input and testing * Complex Parts supplied all needs to John Deere at the time * Complex parts was interested in increasing sales to John Deere * Achieving Excellence Program (AEP) was a supply management program trying to give the competitive advantage to deliver world class equipment * Strived to develop long lasting relationships * Promoted communication, trust, cooperation, and continuous improvement * Key, Partner, approved , conditional supplier rankings * Complex Parts * Started falling short of requirements of John Deere * Not answering phone calls * Delivery rating was over 150,000 * Target cost not met, reducing projected profits on certain things for Deere * Not following Deere Quality Plan at new Facility * Getting quotes on time seemed to be very difficult
Discussion Questions 1. Some of the strengths about the Achieving Excellence Program are that they strived to develop long lasting relationships with their suppliers. They provided supplier performance summaries at the end of each quarter to show the suppliers how they were doing in their part of supply John Deere, and they also had John Deere training programs, but not all suppliers were eligible, which I believe to be one weakness of the program. I believe they chose the right categories to base the supplier’s performance off of (quality, cost management, wavelength, and technical support). One thing that really caught my eye out of the four categories that I believe to be excellent was the wavelength category. This category was an analysis of the supplier’s attitude, responsiveness, attention, initiative, and communication which is key to forming a long lasting relationship between a business and its suppliers. With a good performance in this category, meant that the supplier was dedicated to continually improve not only within itself but with the business it was supplying. 2. From the information provided, I believe that Complex Parts was performing adequately the past year because of their ratings, but recently it seems to me that Complex Parts was not performing adequately. They were not performing adequately because their delivery rating was over 150,000, which is considered as a conditional supplier, they had fallen behind in implementing the Deere Quality program at their new facility, and a number of items supplied by Complex Parts had not met Deere’s cost targets, effectively reducing Deere’s projected profits on these products. In addition, Complex Parts seemed to have trouble answering phone calls and getting quotes on some parts in a timely fashion. This to me is not a supplier performing adequately. Conditional supplier should have been assigned to Complex Parts at this time with their performance. 3. If I were a member of the supplier evaluation team I would recommend that they start doing things the old way, and by old way I mean the way they did things last year. They seemed to have changed something up from last year and it is causing them to slip as a supplier. They need to follow with the Deere Quality Plan, cost targets, answering within a timely manner, and fix the deliveries and they will be back to being a key partner, otherwise if business with them keeps going the same way, they will not be a supplier of John Deere any more, since there are other company’s out there that are capable of doing the same thing as Complex Parts. I would recommend letting them go until the end of the quarter to see if they are fixing the problem they seem to be having, and if they do not improve to go to someone else. 4. Well it could either get better or get worse for the short and long term implications. It all depends on whether Complex Parts wants to still be a supplier of John Deere and step their game back up to what it was last year. The only problem I could see, is trying to establish a whole other network with another company if Complex Parts doesn’t step it up.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

John Deere and Complex Parts, Inc.

...Assignment # 3 Case 5 John Deere and Complex Parts, Inc. Summary Deere & Company was formed in 1837, with its headquarters set up in Moline, Illinois and were considered as a pioneer in manufacturing farm and forestry equipment, construction, commercial and consumer equipment. Their broad range of products and services included equipment financing, power systems, special technologies. In 2006, supplier evaluation team members of Deere Inc. Moline unit were united to discuss the performance of Complex Parts. For the past 10 years, Complex Parts, Inc. had been playing a key role in Deere’s sales with an annual approximation of U.S. $3.5 million. Their contribution to Deere Inc. included supplying them a key manufactured part, which required significant engineering input and testing. Even though other suppliers could produce this part, Complex parts Inc. took charge of it by actively involving with Deere Inc.’s sales engineers weekly, associating with their cost reduction strategies. And keeping up the Deere Inc.’s design changes and globalizing their quality plan. But during the past year, Complex Parts had provided questionable service to the Moline unit and now the unit manager John has been analyzing whether to continue business with Complex Parts, Inc. or to source it from a new supplier. Deere Inc. had a dynamic supply management strategy in place, known as Achieving Excellence Program (AEP). The program was about giving Deere and its suppliers the necessary...

Words: 1498 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

John Deere and Complex Parts, Inc.

...Background Deere & Company was founded over 177 years ago in 1837 and since then have grown into a multi billion dollar corporation that has established themselves as the leading manufacturer of farming and forestry equipment. Their products reside in over 110 countries and as of 2013; they employ over 67,000 individuals (Statista, 2014). In 2006 members of John Deere’s supplier evaluation team were discussing a long time supplier, Complex Parts, performance. Over the past year, their service had declined resulting in an unfavorable and less profitable relationship between John Deere and Complex Parts and the supplier evaluation team was tasked with providing a recommended course of action to their project manager within the coming week (Wisner, Tan, & Leong, 2012). John Deere employed the Achieving Excellence Program (AEP) as a supply management strategy aimed to develop long-lasting supplier relationships by an evaluation process that promoted communication, trust, cooperation and continuous improvements. Suppliers under the AEP were evaluated in their quality, delivery, cost management, wavelength, and their technical support. The AEP is what the supplier evaluation team was required to utilize in their evaluation and decision process in order to remain fair and unbiased to all of John Deere’s suppliers (Wisner, Tan, & Leong, 2012). Discuss the strength and weakness of John Deere’s Achieving Excellence Program. Consider and discuss other criteria to include in the...

Words: 1219 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

John Deere and Complex Parts Inc

...MIT School of Business (MITSOB) Post Graduate Diploma in Management (PGDM) Backlog (April 2014) Semester II Term End Examination Subject: Operations Research (203) Total Marks: 50 Duration: 2½ Hrs. Instructions: 1) Formulate the problems in the answer sheet. 2) Students should write the steps and formulae used in the cells along with the final answer, in the answer sheet so that examiner will be able to evaluate the answers. 3) No marks will be given in case only the final answer is written in the answer sheet. 4) Only MS Excel is to be used. No other software/packages are to be used. 5) Assume suitable data/method, if necessary and mention the assumptions, wherever made. 6) Only the text book issued, i.e., ‘Operations Research and Quantitative Techniques by Prof (Gp Capt) D.P. Apte’ is permitted to be referred during the examination. No other material is permitted. ______________________________________________________________________________ Section A: Solve the following Case (Marks 20) Q1: ‘Venus Book Stall’ is a famous book stall on near Arts, Science & Commerce College selling college text books, stationary, calculators etc. for the last seven years. The manager has observed that there is increasing trend in the sales of textbooks over this period. The number of books sold per year is as follows: Year | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Number of books sold | 1049 | 1125 | 1243 | 1360...

Words: 1138 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Case Study

...John Deere and Complex Parts, Inc. 1 On Friday, November 22, 2006 Blake Roberts, Hayley Marie, Stan Eakins, and John Pearson, one of John Deere’s supplier evaluation teams, were discussing the performance of Complex Parts. They had provided questionable service to John Deere’s Moline unit over the past year, and they were wondering if this merited giving Complex Products’ business to a different supplier. They needed to recommend a course of action to their project manager next week. Company Backgrounds Deere & Company, headquartered in Moline, Illinois, was founded in 1837 and in 2007, they conducted business in over 110 countries and employed approximately 47,000 people worldwide. They are the world’s leading manufacturer of farm and forestry equipment, and also produce construction, commercial, and consumer equipment. Other products and services produced by Deere include equipment financing, power systems, special technologies, and healthcare. Net sales in 2006 were over $19 billion with total assets of more than $34 billion. Cost of goods sold in 2006 was approximately $15 billion. Complex Parts, Inc. had been a supplier of John Deere for the past 10 years with annual sales to their Moline unit of approximately $3.5 million. They supplied Deere with a key manufactured part requiring significant engineering input and testing. Two other Deere suppliers were capable of supplying this part; however, Complex Parts was providing all of Deere’s needs at the time...

Words: 1335 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Feere

...John Deere and Complex Parts, Inc. 1 On Friday, November 22, 2006 Blake Roberts, Hayley Marie, Stan Eakins, and John Pearson, one of John Deere’s supplier evaluation teams, were discussing the performance of Complex Parts. They had provided questionable service to John Deere’s Moline unit over the past year, and they were wondering if this merited giving Complex Products’ business to a different supplier. They needed to recommend a course of action to their project manager next week. Company Backgrounds Deere & Company, headquartered in Moline, Illinois, was founded in 1837 and in 2007, they conducted business in over 110 countries and employed approximately 47,000 people worldwide. They are the world’s leading manufacturer of farm and forestry equipment, and also produce construction, commercial, and consumer equipment. Other products and services produced by Deere include equipment financing, power systems, special technologies, and healthcare. Net sales in 2006 were over $19 billion with total assets of more than $34 billion. Cost of goods sold in 2006 was approximately $15 billion. Complex Parts, Inc. had been a supplier of John Deere for the past 10 years with annual sales to their Moline unit of approximately $3.5 million. They supplied Deere with a key manufactured part requiring significant engineering input and testing. Two other Deere suppliers were capable of supplying this part; however, Complex Parts was providing all of Deere’s needs at the time...

Words: 1335 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Deere and Complex Parts Case Study

...JOHN DEERE AND COMPLEX PARTS INC. I. Summary of Findings Deere & Company is the global leading manufacturer for forestry and farm equipment, but also produces other equipment such as for construction, commercial and consumer. The company’s total assets amounted to over $34 billion, and thus proves that the company produces quality products patronized by plenty consumers. Deere & Company has been working with Complex Parts, Inc. for a very long time, which earns $3.5 million from the former. They have been working together for the past 10 years. Deere aims to be of world quality, with strong supplier relationships by the use of the Achieving Excellence Program (AEP). The program is an evaluation process regarding suppliers in the business, which results to stronger supplier relationships for better equipment quality in the long run. The performance of Complex Parts gets good scores from the AEP, although is weak in some parts, such as responsiveness, which challenges Deere between choosing a new supplier or changing their standards in the program. II. Background Information Deere & Company was founded by John Deere in 1837, and is headquartered in Moline, Illinois. They are the world’s leading manufacturer of farm and forestry equipment, and also produce construction, commercial and consumer equipment. Other products and services produced by Deere included equipment financing, power systems, special technologies and healthcare. In 2007...

Words: 2022 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Sky the Limit

... | | [pic] Executive Summary The purpose of this report was to analysis costing system at John Deere Component Works (B). Specific objectives were to analyze the reports prepared by William and Vintila and offer recommendations on their suggestion. Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 2 2. Table of Content ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..3 3. Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 4 4. Conclusion & Recommendation ………………………………………………………………………………………………. 5 5. Discussion 5.1 Product Cost under ABC ………………………………………………………………………………………….. 6 5.2 Product Mix has shifted ………………………………………………………………………………………….. 6-7 5.3 Assumption about Cost Variability in ABC ………………………………………………………………. 7-8 5.4 Development of ABC ……………………………………………………………………………………………… 8 5.5 Implementation of ABC …………………………………………………………………………………………. 8-9 5.6 Acceptance of ABC ………………………………………………………………………………………………… 9 5.7 Increasing Lot Size ………………………………………………………………………………………………….9-10 6. References …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….11 Introduction John Deere had been structured to be a captive producer of parts for...

Words: 3835 - Pages: 16

Premium Essay

Does It Matter

...organization receive in turns of funding and management support? Is IT a “value adding” area? Or merely a “cost center”? I used to work for John Deere in Coahuila, Mexico. What is very interesting is that approximately 10 years ago the IT administration barely existed, as they didn’t even have a CIO. In that time, maintaining operational data centers running was more than enough. Today, the expectations from the CIO are much more. John Deere expects that the CIO be a business leader, not only an administrator of TI; JD expects that he leads a complex critical mission as any other operation in the company and work shoulder to shoulder with the business units to help improve the performance and efficiency of the company. The IT administration is led by the CIO and the CIO reports directly to the CEO. The CIO is involved in the steering committees because he is the one who has the ability to deliver technology solutions to the business requirements. If the CIO weren’t involved in the strategic planning process it would be very difficult for him to contribute to the transformation of the organization using Information Technology. Therefore, besides his own experience in the area, the CIO also has a financial background to be able to demonstrate the tangible benefits of investing in Information Technology. This big decision that John Deere took back then, makes me think that the IT management receives good funding and management support. 2. Think about a recent IT investment...

Words: 697 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

John Deere & Company

...Deere & Company In 1837, Deere and Company was founded by John Deere. Deere & Company is one of the seven full-line farm equipment manufacturers in the world. During the three-decade, post-World War II boom period, Deere expanded its product line, built new plants, ran plants at capacity, and still was unable to keep up with demand. During this same period, Deere had diversified into off-the-road industrial equipment for use in the construction, forestry, utility, and mining industries. Competitive environment In the 1980’s, the collapse of farmland values and commodity prices led to the worst and most sustained agricultural crisis since the Great Depression. Several factors intensified the crisis; the high dollar reduced US exports and hurt both American farmers and American farm equipment producers. Farmers had been encouraged to go into heavy debt to expand and buy land, consequently when land values and farm prices plummeted, the number of farm foreclosures skyrocketed. Few farmers were in a position to buy new equipment, and resale of repossessed equipment further reduced the market for new equipment. Due to this, Deere adjusted its level of operations downward, cut costs where possible, increased emphasis on pushing decision making downward, and restructured manufacturing processes. Deere wanted its captive component divisions to supply other companies and industries to add production volume. However, nearly all of John Deere Component Works (JDCW) sales were internal...

Words: 1439 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

John Deere

...Business Analysis on Deere & Company McKenzie R. Mayfield Tarleton State University Dr. Nathan Heller October 31, 2015 Author Note I attest that this document is an original creation submitted in accordance with the requirement for the Comprehensive Written Project (CWP) in Seminar in Business Strategy (GB-5388) during the Fall 2015 academic term. Abstract This document provides an in depth company analysis of Deere & Company (DE). In the first segment of the analysis, an overview of John Deere’s history, product and service offerings, corporate strategy, and a synopsis of the heavy equipment production industry will be evaluated. The second segment includes a financial overview and analysis of the three most recent years at Deere & Company. In order to do so, balance sheets, income statements, and key financial ratios will be collected and evaluated. In the third segment, this paper will examine the heavy equipment market, current industry averages, economic climate, and financial and strategic statuses of competing businesses. After the analysis is complete, a SWOT analysis (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) will be conducted in order to identify key success factors and driving forces. Based on the results of the SWOT analysis, the final segment of this document will make recommendations about the strategic actions that Deere & Company should take in the future. Keywords: [Click here to add keywords.] Comprehensive Business Analysis on Deere & Company When...

Words: 2180 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Case Study

...John Deere Component Works Background: John Deere Component Works (JDCW), subdivision of John Deere and Co, was in charged specifically of the manufacturing of tractor component parts. The demand for JDCW’s products had problems due to the collapse of farmland value and commodity prices. By the mid 1980’s, JDCW found that the available excess capacity was increasing, it decided to take advantage of the efficiencies of the newly acquired automatic turning machines by bidding on parts offered from within the country. But ultimately, JDCW only bid successfully for 58 parts out of 275 parts, worse still, the 58 parts were all low volume parts, contrary to its aim to attain the bids that offered the higher volume parts. The failure in its competition for bids made management question about its current costing system. As a result, we have to analyze the current costing methods to determine the validity and to help the company adopt a more reasonable costing system. Assignment Questions: Q3: JDCW was established as the subdivision of John Deere Company during the 1970’s when the demand was increasing. JDCW had been structured to be a captive producer of parts for Deere’s equipment divisions, particularly tractors. During the mid 1980’s, the Gear and Special Products Division of JDCW decided that the complex machined parts would make full use of the excess capacity, then more automated machines developed leading to the increased manufacture overhead costs. As a result, the company...

Words: 901 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Main Assignemnt

...Task 1- Sky’s the Limit’s future |Changes in Business Environment |Organizational Responses |Management Responses | |Increase in global competition is changing |Sky’s the limit should have a flatter |Sky’s the limit should follow activity-based | |the business environment as trade barriers |organizational structure in order to adjust |costing system because it will result in more| |fall and manufacturing cost of balloons will |as per changing business environment. For |accurate product cost, labor cost etc. This | |decrease due to increase in product demand, |e.g. Sky’s the limit needs to establish |will also result in one rate for cost | |hence attracting new competitors entering New|separate departments for manufacturing |allocation for each manufacturing overhead | |Zealand market. |customized and standard balloons. Also in |activity. | | |order to maintain high quality of balloons, a| | | |separate quality control unit should be | | | |established within the factory. | | |Deregulation of service sectors such as |Training...

Words: 3466 - Pages: 14

Free Essay

Mkt 315 Wk 9 Quiz 7 Chapter 14

...MKT 315 WK 9 QUIZ 7 CHAPTER 14 To purchase this visit here: http://www.activitymode.com/product/mkt-315-wk-9-quiz-7-chapter-14/ Contact us at: SUPPORT@ACTIVITYMODE.COM MKT 315 WK 9 QUIZ 7 CHAPTER 14 MKT 315 WK 9 Quiz 7 Chapter 14 MULTIPLE CHOICE 1. Which of the following is a false statement about the Deere & Company and its independent dealers? a. John has nearly 3000 independent dealers. b. John Deere's new CEO, Robert Lane, says its dealers are part of the Deere family and can never be replaced. c. Dealers need to achieve targeted levels of sales. d. John Deere dealers are needed to proved technical service to their customers. e. The Dealers are part of the logistical programs to provide parts to John Deere customers. 2. According to the text, the evaluation of channel member performance is: a. Of less importance than employee evaluation. b. More important than employee evaluation. c. Of equal importance to employee evaluation. d. Easier to do than employee evaluation. e. Done far more frequently than employee evaluation. 3. Which of the following is not a factor affecting the scope and frequency of channel member evaluations? a. The level of expertise of the channel managers b. Relative importance of channel members c. Degree of manufacturer’s control over the channel members d. Nature of the product e. Number of channel members 4. The degree of control the manufacturer has over its channel members plays __________ in determining the scope and...

Words: 1294 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

A Tool for Manufacturing Excellence

...Costing: A Tool for Manufacturing Excellence ABC is a strategic weaoon in the Quest for comoetitive oosition. By Peter B.B. Turney, Ph.D. This article exammes rne role of actiVity-based costing in the achievement of manufacturing excellence. It describes manufacturing excellence and the product cost information requirements of managers who seek to achieve it. It shows how conventional product costing fails to meet these needs, and demonstrates how activity-based costing corrects these deficiencies. It explains how managers in manufacturing companies can use activitybased costing for strategic, product design, and continuous improvement purposes. Finally, the article lays to rest fears that activity-based costing may be too costly and complex to be compatible with manufacturing excellence. and sustaining a comA chievingadvantage via attention petitive manufacturing excellence requires to all aspects of manufacturing performance. This attention requires that managers have information that helps them choose correct strategies, improve product design, and remove waste from operating activities. Conventional product costing systems provide little information on these sources of competitive advantage. Schrader Bellows found that the product costs generated by their conventional system were so inaccurate they encouraged management to adopt strategies which inhibited the improvement of manufacturing.' Product designers at the Portable Instrument Division of Tektronix reacted to...

Words: 4996 - Pages: 20

Free Essay

Kubota in Brazil

...KUBOTA in Brazil                     Aaron Bair Josh Burns Hailey Duff Erin Franklin Kelsey Youngblut December 2, 2013     Table of Contents Introduction  .................................................................................................................................................  1   Executive Summary  .....................................................................................................................................  2   Feasibility Analysis  .....................................................................................................................................  4   Economic Analysis  ......................................................................................................................................  6   Political and Legal Environment Analysis  ..................................................................................................  7   Cultural and Ethical Analysis  ......................................................................................................................  8   Resource Analysis  .......................................................................................................................................  9   SWOT Analysis  .............................................................................................................................

Words: 7429 - Pages: 30