Judicial Affidavit Rule

In: Other Topics

Submitted By nenit101
Words 1993
Pages 8
[A.M. No. 12-8-8-SC, 4 September 2012]

JUDICIAL AFFIDAVIT RULE
Whereas, case congestion and delays plague most courts in cities, given the huge volume of cases filed each year and the slow and cumbersome adversarial system that the judiciary has in place;

Whereas, about 40% of criminal cases are dismissed annually owing to the fact that complainants simply give up coming to court after repeated postponements;

Whereas, few foreign businessmen make long-term investments in the Philippines because its courts are unable to provide ample and speedy protection to their investments, keeping its people poor;

Whereas, in order to reduce the time needed for completing the testimonies of witnesses in cases under litigation, on February 21, 2012 the Supreme Court approved for piloting by trial courts in Quezon City the compulsory use of judicial affidavits in place of the direct testimonies of witnesses;

Whereas, it is reported that such piloting has quickly resulted in reducing by about two-thirds the time used for presenting the testimonies of witnesses, thus speeding up the hearing and adjudication of cases;

Whereas, the Supreme Court Committee on the Revision of the Rules of Court, headed by Senior Associate Justice Antonio T. Carpio, and the Sub-Committee on the Revision of the Rules on Civil Procedure, headed by Associate Justice Roberto A. Abad, have recommended for adoption a Judicial Affidavit Rule that will replicate nationwide the success of the Quezon City experience in the use of judicial affidavits; and

Whereas, the Supreme Court En Banc finds merit in the recommendation;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Supreme Court En Banc hereby issues and promulgates the following:

Section 1. Scope. – (a) This Rule shall apply to all actions, proceedings, and incidents requiring the reception of evidence before:

(1) The Metropolitan Trial Courts, the…...

Similar Documents

Judicial Independence

...Introduction Judicial independence, although often argued to be a fundamental concept to the rule of law, democracy and political stability, alarmingly continues to be contested and vague even in economically developed liberal democratic states recognized for the rule of law. This was particularly indicated by leading US constitutional scholar ‘name’, ‘there is a disagreement about whether or how to criticize judges and their decisions, and about whether or how to discipline judges. And, of course, there is pervasive disagreement about whether our judges exhibit too much or too little independence.’ The problems are exaggerated in cases of developing countries with unstable democracies and non-liberal authoritarian regimes. The key objective of this essay is to subject judicial independence and the statements presented on its behalf to critical examination. China is of use when analysing general ideas as it signifies a challenge to the universal understanding about what judicial independence is and why it is important. Although China ‘has never had independent courts’, the country continues to be an effective single-party socialist authoritarian regime, becoming a likely model for other developing states. Judicial Corruption in China It is certainly reasonable to say that judicial independence is an acknowledged theory in the Chinese Constitution. The original 1954 Constitution declared the need for the Supreme People’s Court (SPC) to judge cases independently. In...

Words: 3903 - Pages: 16

Judicial Affidavit

...REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES REGIONAL TRIAL COURT NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION BRANCH 245, PASIG CITY PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES Plaintiff. -versus- CRIM CASE NO. 111222-33-44-GG FOR: THEFT BOB ONG Accused. X------------------------------------------- X JUDICIAL AFFIDAVIT I, POL G. MEDINA, Filipino of legal age, married and with address at 1224 PugadBaboy St. San Andrews, Manila, after having been duly sworn in accordance with law, do hereby depose and state that: Question No. 1 (“Q1”): What is your current profession? Answer (“A”): I am currently a barangay tanod in our barangay. Q2: Where is your barangay? A: It is in PugadBaboy St. San Andrews, Manila Q3: How long have you been a barangay tanod? A: I have been a tanod for 2 years now. Q4: What are the principal duties of your profession? A: My responsibility includes keeping the security of our barangay, traffic control, making arrests if there is a crime happening and there are no police to make the arrest. Q5: Where you the one who arrested the suspect BOB ONG? A: Yes, me and some of the tanods as well Q6: What day was this? A: Sunday, January 5, 2013 Q7: At what time did you make the arrest? A: It was 2:00 in the morning Q8: Are you sure? A: Yes Q9: How can you be sure? A: I looked at my wristwatch, and because I studied law and it taught me that whenever you make arrests, you...

Words: 955 - Pages: 4

Judicial Affidavit Rule

...[A.M. No. 12-8-8-SC, 4 September 2012] JUDICIAL AFFIDAVIT RULE Whereas, case congestion and delays plague most courts in cities, given the huge volume of cases filed each year and the slow and cumbersome adversarial system that the judiciary has in place; Whereas, about 40% of criminal cases are dismissed annually owing to the fact that complainants simply give up coming to court after repeated postponements; Whereas, few foreign businessmen make long-term investments in the Philippines because its courts are unable to provide ample and speedy protection to their investments, keeping its people poor; Whereas, in order to reduce the time needed for completing the testimonies of witnesses in cases under litigation, on February 21, 2012 the Supreme Court approved for piloting by trial courts in Quezon City the compulsory use of judicial affidavits in place of the direct testimonies of witnesses; Whereas, it is reported that such piloting has quickly resulted in reducing by about two-thirds the time used for presenting the testimonies of witnesses, thus speeding up the hearing and adjudication of cases; Whereas, the Supreme Court Committee on the Revision of the Rules of Court, headed by Senior Associate Justice Antonio T. Carpio, and the Sub-Committee on the Revision of the Rules on Civil Procedure, headed by Associate Justice Roberto A. Abad, have recommended for adoption a Judicial Affidavit Rule that will replicate nationwide the success of the Quezon City...

Words: 1993 - Pages: 8

Judicial Affidavit

...___________________ VS. ___________________ CIVIL CASE NO. ___________________ HON. ___________________________ RTC-_______________, BRANCH ___ JUDICIAL AFFIDAVIT OF PETITIONER ___________________ I, ___________________, of legal age, married, and living at ___________________, petitioner in this case, state under oath as follows: PRELIMINARY STATEMENT The person examining me is Atty. ___________________ with address at ___________________. The examination is being held at the same address. I am answering his questions fully conscious that I do so under oath and may face criminal liability for false testimony and perjury. PURPOSE: This affidavit/testimony of petitioner ___________________ is being offered to prove that the respondent ___________________ contracted marriage twice, ___________________ on ___________________, and later with the petitioner ___________________ on ___________________ while the respondent’s previous marriage with ___________________ was still valid and has not yet legally dissolved. Petitioner will also prove that prior to her marriage with the respondent she was previously married to ___________________ on ___________________, which marriage was still valid and subsisting at the time she contracted marriage with the respondent. The petitioner’s testimony is also offered to prove the legal basis for the declaration of nullity of the petitioner’s marriage with the respondent, the same being bigamous. 1. Q. Please...

Words: 1062 - Pages: 5

Judicial Review

...Judicial review is the power of the Supreme Court to decide whether or not a law is constitutional. The Supreme Court has the power to say that a law that Congress passed violates the Constitution and is therefore invalid. But when should the Court do this? When should it overturn a law that has been passed by Congress which, unlike the Supreme Court, has been elected by the people? This is where judicial philosophy comes in. There are generally said to be four judicial philosophies that come in two pairs. First, there are the philosophies of loose constructionism and strict constructionism. Strict constructionism holds that the Supreme Court should interpret the Constitution very strictly. If the Constitution does not say (for example) that there is a right to privacy, then there is no such right. Loose constructionism says that the Court should go more by the general meaning of the Constitution, not by its exact words. Therefore, a loose constructionist would say that the Constitution implies that we have a right to privacy and therefore we do have that right. Second, there is judicial activism and judicial restraint. Judicial activists believe that judges should strike down laws relatively often. If the Court thinks the law is unconstitutional, it should not hesitate to strike it down. Those who believe in judicial restraint think the Court should not strike laws down very often. Instead, the Court should generally let Congress do what it wants because......

Words: 260 - Pages: 2

Judicial Review

...Judicial Review: The power enables the judicial branch to act as a check on the other two branches of government. Jurisdiction: The power to speak the law. In Rem Jurisdiction: Court can exercise jurisdiction over property that is located within its boundaries. Bankruptcy Court: Only handles bankruptcy proceedings. Probate Courts: State courts that handle only matters relating to the transfer of a person’s assets and obligations after that person’s death. Federal Courts: Federal government is a government of limited power, the jurisdiction is limited. Federal Courts have subject-matter jurisdiction in two ways: 1.) Federal questions: Plaintiff’s cause of action is based, at least in part, on the U.S. Constitution, a treaty, or a federal law. 2.) Diversity of Citizenship: Federal district courts can also exercise original jurisdiction over cases: A.) Plaintiff and Defendant must be residents of different states B.) Money amount must exceed $75,000. Concurrent Jurisdiction: Both Federal and State courts have the power to hear a case, as in suits involving diversity of citizenship. Exclusive Jurisdiction: One or the other only could tried the case. Venue: Concerned with the most appropriate location for a trial. Standing to Sue: Sufficient stake in a matter to justify seeking relief through the court system. Justiciable Controversy: A controversy that is real and substantial. The State Court System: 1.) Local...

Words: 740 - Pages: 3

Judicial Precedent

... emergence of new social and economic relations, the foundations of civil society and the rule of law, the implementation of judicial and legal reform, taking measures to strengthen the fight against crime, strengthening law and order, eradication of legal nihilism. In the implementation of these tasks, their embodiment in life significant role belongs to the judiciary. It is well known that the law do not yet sufficiently quickly adjust dynamically developing social relations. Important additional regulatory function falls on a legal precedent. The problem of application of current legislation and related with it legislative activity of the judiciary in modern conditions acquires special significance. The judiciary as one of the branches of state power is currently implementing not only functions of justice, but also function of judicial lawmaking . The work of the judiciary in a law-based state must protect not only human rights and freedoms, but the law in general from any actions and decisions no matter where they come from. At the same time the denial of justice on grounds of absence of regulatory legal act or its ambiguity in case of controversial relationship is unacceptable, in such cases the court has right to judicial lawmaking. Despite its fundamental importance, the doctrine of judicial precedent has not yet received a clear understanding and approval of the Ukrainian legal science and practice. In Soviet legal theory for many years precedent was denied,......

Words: 6308 - Pages: 26

Affidavit

...REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES ) PROVINCE OF CAVITE ) S.S. MUN. OF GEN. MARIANO ALVAREZ ) AFFIDAVIT ON CAR ACCIDENT I, RODELITO VILLANUEVA MANALO, of legal age, married, and a resident of Block 41 Lot 6, Raspberry Street, Pacific Park Place Village, Dasmariñas, Cavite, after having been duly sworn in accordance with law, hereby depose and say: 1. That I am the owner of motor vehicle “2004 Toyota Vios 1.4 E/MT” with plate no. VCE225, color Red with Engine No. 2NZ-2936861 and Chassis No. MRO53HY41-09001439; 2. That the above described vehicle was being driven by me, I am a holder of Non-Professional Driver’s License #N01-97-206062 valid until 2017-05-06 issued by LTO- Dasmariñas, Cavite; 3. That today July 24, 2014 7:30am at the Parking Lot of Discovery Suit Hotel I was backing for me to park my car properly, but suddenly the Rear Left side of my Bumper bumped the post in Parking Lot resulting to damages; 4. That I understand that my vehicle as insured with Standard Insurance Co., Inc. covers damages caused by the accident as per insurance policy; 5. That I executed this Affidavit to attest to the fact of the damage sustained by my car to support my claim with the insurance company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto affixed my signature this 24th day of July, 2014 at Gen. Mariano Alvarez, Cavite. RODELITO VILLANUEVA MANALO...

Words: 348 - Pages: 2

Judicial Process

...2 The State Judicial Process The State Judicial Selection Process Have you ever wondered how the judges within your state are chosen? The way a judge is chosen for the state varies from state to state, and there are a few ways they are put on the bench. One way for a judge to be put on the bench is to be appointed by the Governor or state legislature (FindLaw, 2012). A second way to choose a judge is through a merit selection. A merit selection is where a judge is chosen by a legislative committee based on each of the potential judge's performance in the past (FindLaw, 2012). A third way to get a judge on the bench is by a partisan election; in which a judge is selected through partisan elections that are voted in by the electorate, or voters registered to parties, because judges often run as part of a political party affiliate (FindLaw, 2012). A Non-Partisan Election is the final way to get on the bench. This is when the potential judges running for a judicial position in the states can put their names on the ballot, but they do not list their political party affiliates (National League of Cities, 2014). In the state of Florida, judges being elected for a term in the state trial courts of general jurisdiction are elected by way of a nonpartisan election (Carp, Stidham, & Manning, 2014). When judges are being selected for a term in the state courts of last resort, the state of Florida utilizes a merit selection (Carp, Stidham, & Manning, 2014). The length...

Words: 1994 - Pages: 8

Affidavit

...REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES } Province of Agusan del Norte }s.s. Municipality of San Miguel } AFFIDAVIT COMPLAINT of Lady Empedrad ------------------------------------------------- PRELIMINARIES: The Affiant was reminded that each question and every answer shall be submitted and can be used for and against him as a matter of right and requisites of judicial processes provided under our 1987 Constitution, such as: Investigator : You have the right to have a counsel that you can confer with and if you cannot afford the services of a lawyer, one will be provided by the government for free, that you can confer with during this investigation, do you understand this right? Affiant : Yes sir. Investigator : After knowing your right, what can you say? Affiant : I voluntarily waive my right to counsel, but submit myself for investigation and willing to give my free and voluntary statement based on my personal knowledge on the incident. Investigator : Are you still willing to give your voluntary statement under the penalty of perjury as provided under the law? Affiant : Yes sir. QUESTION AND ANSWER 1. Question : Can you state your name, address and other personal circumstances? Answer : I am Lady Empedrad 31 years old, married and a resident of Purok 1, Barangay 8, Buenavista, Agusan del Norte. 2. Question : What is your purpose in executing this affidavit? Answer : 1. To file a formal complaint for the case of Violation of...

Words: 1863 - Pages: 8

Judicial Affidavit of Estafa

... rehabilitation of the damaged area; c. To temporarily take over or direct operation of any privately-owned public utility or business affected with public interest, in times of state of calamity declared by the Chief Minister, when the public interest so requires and under such reasonable terms and safeguards as may be prescribed by the Parliament. The public utility or business concerned may contest the take-over of its operations by the Bangsamoro Government by filing a proper case or petition with the Court of Appeals; d. To recognize constructive or traditional possession of lands and resources by indigenous cultural communities subject to judicial affirmation, the petition for which shall be instituted within a period of ten (10) years from the effectivity of the Basic Law. The procedure for the judicial affirmation of imperfect titles under existing laws shall, as far as practicable, apply to the judicial affirmation of titles to ancestral lands; e. To adopt and implement a comprehensive urban land reform and land use program, to ensure the just utilization of lands within its jurisdiction; f. The Bangsamoro Parliament shall have the following powers: 1. To enact legislation on the rights of the people of the Bangsamoro to initiate measures for the passage, amendment or repeal of regional or local legislation; to be consulted on matters that affect their environment; to call for a referendum on important issues affecting their lives; and, to recall regional or......

Words: 26005 - Pages: 105

Judicial Affidavit

...___________________ VS. ___________________ CIVIL CASE NO. ___________________ HON. ___________________________ RTC-_______________, BRANCH ___ JUDICIAL AFFIDAVIT OF PETITIONER ___________________ I, ___________________, of legal age, married, and living at ___________________, petitioner in this case, state under oath as follows: PRELIMINARY STATEMENT The person examining me is Atty. ___________________ with address at ___________________. The examination is being held at the same address. I am answering his questions fully conscious that I do so under oath and may face criminal liability for false testimony and perjury. PURPOSE: This affidavit/testimony of petitioner ___________________ is being offered to prove that the respondent ___________________ contracted marriage twice, ___________________ on ___________________, and later with the petitioner ___________________ on ___________________ while the respondent’s previous marriage with ___________________ was still valid and has not yet legally dissolved. Petitioner will also prove that prior to her marriage with the respondent she was previously married to ___________________ on ___________________, which marriage was still valid and subsisting at the time she contracted marriage with the respondent. The petitioner’s testimony is also offered to prove the legal basis for the declaration of nullity of the petitioner’s marriage with the respondent, the same being bigamous. 1. Q. Please...

Words: 1062 - Pages: 5

Affidavit

... Republic of the Philippines] Province of Bohol] Municipality of Getafe]   COMPLAINT-AFFIDAVIT   I, GENU SOCIAS TORREFIEL, of legal age, fisherman, with postal address at Barangay Nasingin, Getafe, Bohol, after having been duly sworn on oath in accordance with law hereby voluntarily depose and say:         1.  That sometime on October 17, 2011or about 4:00 P.M., Monday, October 17, 2011, I was playing basketball in the basketball court of Nasingin, Getafe, Bohol;         3.  That upon arrival at the SB COA gate I noticed that there was no sentinel on the said post.  I proceeded to the front gate and saw two (2) silhouttes (sentinels) posted at the lobby.  Without attracting their attention I walked back to the COA gate which was ajar.  I saw the motorcycle of Renato Zamboanga-Process Server of this court parked infront of the Security Office at the basement and saw SG2 Elberto Q. Bautista holding the telephne on his ears staring blankly and tinkering with the keypad of the same.  He smelled of liquor /alcoholic breath.           4.  That I noticed SG3 Ferdinand Gurtiza together with an unidentified female person later alleged to be the paramour of the former, also inside the security office, having a drinking spree.  I smelled stench air inside the security office that I felt nauseating.  Upon my cursory look at the floor, I saw two (2) empty bottles of Red horse Beer; and two (2) tin caps of Ginebra San Miguel marked LTDI.  The floor is messy, and so is the middle office...

Words: 2479 - Pages: 10

Judicial Independence

...Explain three ways in which judicial independence is protected in the United Kingdom. The first way that judicial independence is protected in the United Kingdom is that the parliament does not comment on the cases which are before the court. The reason for this is so that there is no political influence on cases, this is key on large cases that may have a political connection such as the News of the World phone-hacking scandal. This scandal was a group of editors were sentenced for hacking mobile devices. One man in this case; Andy Coulson had risen to become David Cameron’s director of communications. If Mr Cameron had commented on proceedings it may be seen as interference as Mr Cameron is such an influential figure that his opinion may have affected the judge’s views and decisions. By not allowing parliament to comment on judicial cases it protects the independence of the court and keeps it fair and prevents political biased in cases. The second is the principle of parliamentary privilege. This is that members of parliament are protected from prosecution in certain circumstances by the courts. These circumstances are when legislators are granted protection against civil or criminal liability for actions done or statements made in the course of their legislative duties. The point of this principle is to make sure that members of parliament are able to fulfil their duties and do their job without being at risk of being charged if the actions they take may be questionable...

Words: 400 - Pages: 2

Affidavit

...BITS PILANI-2012 ANNEXURE-I AFFIDAVIT BY THE STUDENT I, ______________ (APPNO/ID No. _____________) s/o __________________________, having been admitted to BITS Pilani __________ Campus, have received a copy of the UGC Regulations on Curbing the Menace of Ragging in Higher Educational Institutions, 2009, (hereinafter called the “Regulations”) carefully read and fully understood the provisions contained in the said Regulations. 2) 3) I have, in particular, perused clause 3 of the Regulations and am aware as to what constitutes ragging. I have also, in particular, perused clause 7 and clause 9.1 of the Regulations and am fully aware of the penal and administrative action that is liable to be taken against me in case I am found guilty of or abetting ragging, actively or passively, or being part of a conspiracy to promote ragging. 4) I hereby solemnly aver and undertake that a) I will not indulge in any behavior or act that may be constituted as ragging under clause 3 of the Regulations. b) I will not participate in or abet or propagate through any act of commission or omission that may be constituted as ragging under clause 3 of the Regulations. 5) I hereby affirm that, if found guilty of ragging, I am liable for punishment according to clause 9.1 of the Regulations, without prejudice to any other criminal action that may be taken against me under any penal law or any law for the time being in force. 6) I hereby declare that I have not been expelled or debarred from...

Words: 794 - Pages: 4