Free Essay

Jury in Danger

In: English and Literature

Submitted By Imran786
Words 839
Pages 4
Jury in Danger.

There were twelve people on the jury. Every one of them killed. No one knew who to blame, but they all suspected the prosecutor, Ash Mayfield. He had been accused of killing his wife, Jessica.
The jury members were told to take their seats, as the bailiff announced that court was in session.
Everyone had taken their seats while Mr Sultan called up his first witness. After about ten minutes or so, Mr Evans, Ash's lawyer, brought up his witnesses.

It continued this way for about another hour or so and then it was time for everyone to go home.
The judge announced that the very next day, the jury should have a verdict. When that day came,
Mayfield was found not guilty. Five days later, the killings began.
The twelve jury members from the Mayfield case were Karen, Linda, Diane, Martin, Louise, Tracey,
Ben, Michael, Robert, Samantha, Simon, and John. If only they had known how miserable their lives were about to become. John was at a restaurant with his wife, Suzy. It was their first anniversary, and so they wanted to make it special. It was special alright, but for the worst. John and his wife were talking, when John had to go to the men's room. John was standing over the sink washing his hands. He suspected he was alone, but then out of nowhere someone came up from behind him and wrapped a rope tightly around his neck. He struggled and fought but his attacker was too strong. As
John's face turned from pale to purple, he hit the ground.

That same night, Karen was in her bedroom. Her long, luscious hair flowed as she walked, over to one of her drawers, searching for her favourite outfit. Not knowing her fate she turned around to meet the edge of large dagger, stabbed twenty four times. Blood everywhere. She yelled for help, but by the time her neighbours came, her killer was gone and she was dead.

Now the police began to get suspicious. Two jury members, killed on the same day. Was it just a coincidence? They decided not to assume anything right away. But after four more strange occurrences the following day, the police began to pull suspects. Linda’s' body was found in the local park. At first the police could not make out the body because it seems she had been cut up, into pieces. Tracey, Ben, Michael, and Diane had all been reported missing by family members. Usually, search parties are only sent out when people are missing for over twenty four hours, but since all of these people were previous jury members on the Ash Mayfield case, they made an exception. After about an hour of searching, all four bodies were finally found at the same location. Apparently the killer locked all four of them in a deserted caravan in the woods. The killer then lit the place on fire and went on to his next three victims, Samantha, Martin, and Michael. Witnesses claimed to have seen someone drag three bodies out of the back of their boot and throw each one into the lake. Police went to check it out, and sure enough they were also jury members. They realised the only two jury members left were Robert and Simon and they knew that the two were in great danger. Before anybody could warn them, Robert was found dead near his home from an "accidental" fatal car crash. Who was doing these inhumane things? And how were they moving so fast, escaping the cops every time? A day later Simon was found buried alive in the cemetery. He died from suffocation. An end to the killings. But why did they start? Who had done it? Later on that day, they brought in Ash
Mayfield for questioning. It turns out that Ash had been out of town while these murders were taking place.

But I knew Ash didn't kill the jury. I know. I killed them. They all deserved to die because they couldn't see the truth and they let Ash Mayfield walk free when he should have been convicted.
Jessica, Ash's wife, was my daughter. One night she called and told me he was physically hurting her.
I told her I was coming over, but when I got there, Ash was gone and she was dead. He had beaten her to death. Ash had never met me before because I never liked the idea of my daughter getting married in the first place, which is why he didn't recognise me in the courtroom. The jury should have seen past his lies. But they didn't. They had to pay. My next mission is to get rid of Ash and then I will be satisfied. I know what you're thinking. You're probably thinking that they'll catch me, right? Wrong. No one will ever suspect it's me. I mean after all, would you suspect the judge?

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Assumption of Risk

...sues a skier that feel and thereby knocking down the plaintiff who feel and injured his back. The jury came back with a defendant verdict and the plaintiff files a motion for a new trial on the grounds that the court made an error in instructing the jury as to the Vermont Sports Injury Statute and its relation to the doctrine of assumption of risk and the applications to this case. The appellate court denied their motion for a new trial and stated “that the sports injury statute applied to participants in any sport.” The Assumption of Risk doctrine states that “when a risk or danger is obvious such that it is widely known by reasonable people under the particular circumstances and necessary such that it is impossible or unreasonably difficult or expensive to eliminate, the person engaged in the dangerous activity assumes those obvious and necessary risks,” such as with the risks of falling in downhill skiing and risk that when done in groups other skiers will fall. The plaintiff in attempt to appeal stated that the assumption of risk only applied to the ski resort operators and their actions not that of other skiers, and that the defendant could be accountable for comparative negligence, as the skier was negligent and that negligence caused the plaintiff’s injuries.The sports injury doctrine, relating to 12 V.S.A. § 1037 “which established that there are inherent dangers to be accepted by skiers as a matter of law.” The motion for a new trial was denied and “......

Words: 785 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Hot Coffee

...excessively hot coffee was appropriate for a jury to decide. This Note will discuss the facts and procedural history of McMahon, as well as the Seventh Circuit's ruling on the duty to warn and defectiveness of the product's design. This note will next examine the Ohio Court of Appeals' contrasting decision in Nadel. This comparison will demonstrate the importance of selecting an effective litigation strategy when proceeding on defective product claims. Additionally, this Note will explore courts' differing 310 * Loyola Consumer Law Review levels of confidence in consumers' ability to ascertain the dangers of everyday life. This Note concludes that the Seventh Circuit's approach in McMahon could potentially threaten legitimate recovery by consumers, which in turn, highlights the importance of an effective litigation strategy. The Spill That Spurred National Outrage The precursor to McMahon and Nadel was a highly publicized 1994 case involving a New Mexico woman, Stella Liebeck, who spilled 180 degree McDonald's coffee on herself and suffered serious burns.4 The jury awarded the plaintiff $2.9 million in damages, most of which were punitive in nature. The judge subsequently reduced the verdict to $640,000. The large verdict attracted national attention as politicians, lawyers, and citizen groups, favoring tort reform used the case to symbolize what they believed was wrong with the civil legal system: frivolous lawsuits, excessively high jury verdicts, and huge......

Words: 3301 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Jury Nullification the Alternative Verdict

...Betty Waltermire Critical Issues in Criminal Justice JUS-250 April 19, 2014 Jury Nullification the Alternative Verdict In 1771, John Adams wrote, “It is not only the juror’s right, but his duty to find the verdict according to his own best understanding, judgment and conscience, though in direct opposition to the instructions of the court” (Craig, 2010). No matter the way in which it is written the issue of jury nullification will never disappear. It seems that morality and law are in conflict. This is the beginning for jurors to feel the duty to prevent unfair or unjust criminal law on a person, the people are not willing to punish (Sheflin, 2001). Although the meaning of jury nullification has been written by numerous people and numerous courts have made rulings on jury nullification it still reads the same. Jury nullification occurs when a jury returns a verdict of “Not Guilty” despite its belief that the defendant is guilty of the violation charged. The jury in effect nullifies a law that it believes is either immoral or wrongly applied to the defendant whose fate they are deciding (Linder, 2001). The Grand Jury in states has the job of determining probable cause existed and believes that the defendant actually committed the crime. This group of people holds an enormous amount of power; they can change an offense to a lesser offense, numerous counts to only one, and change a capital offense to...

Words: 1118 - Pages: 5

Free Essay


...condition on the land, if but only if, he: a. knows or by the exercise of reasonable care would discover the condition, and should realize that it involves an unreasonable risk of harm to such invitees, and b. should expect that they will not discover or realize the danger, or will fail to protect themselves against it, and c. fails to exercise reasonable care to protect them against the danger. Section 343A of the Restatement provides: a possessor of land is not liable to his invitees for physical harm caused to them by any activity or condition on the land whose danger is known or obvious to them, unless the possessor should anticipate the harm despite such knowledge or obviousness. Sections 343 and 343A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts preclude liability for a possessor of land where an invitee is injured as a result of a condition whose danger is known or obvious to the invitee, unless the possessor anticipated the injury despite the invitee’s knowledge or the obviousness of the condition. Restatement (Second) of Torts §343A(1). As the cases below illustrate, where a danger is “open or obvious,” the possessor of land does not owe the invitee a duty to take precautions against or warn of open or obvious dangers. Under Pennsylvania law the assumption of the risk doctrine applies to absolve the landowner from liability for injuries sustained if the plaintiff: (1) knows of the risk or hazard, and (2) voluntarily proceeds in that activity. There is substantial......

Words: 4686 - Pages: 19

Premium Essay


... * Individuals arrested have the right to receive Miranda warnings. * The purpose of the procedures is to punish the guilty. * Individuals on trial have the constitutional right to a jury trial. * Court jurisdiction is determined by age. * Individuals have the right to counsel. * Individuals on trial do not have a right to a jury trial. * There is the ability to negotiate and plea bargain. * Court proceedings are public. * Purpose of procedures is to protect and treat. * Proceedings are not considered criminal. * Justice system personnel use discretion. * Court proceedings are private. * Court jurisdiction is determined by offense. * Proceedings are considered criminal. * Prosecutors and defense attorneys are key players in proceedings. Juvenile Justice System | Adult Justice System | Both | Court jurisdiction is determined by age.Court proceedings are private. | Court proceedings are public.Court jurisdiction is determined by offense. | Individuals arrested have the right to receive Miranda warnings.The purpose of the procedures is to punish the guilty.Individuals on trial have the constitutional right to a jury trial.Individuals have the right to counsel.Individuals on trial do not have a right to a jury trial.There is the ability to negotiate and plea bargain.Purpose of procedures is to protect and treat.Proceedings are not considered criminal.Justice system personnel use discretion.Proceedings......

Words: 733 - Pages: 3

Free Essay


...customers intend to consume the coffee immediately while driving. McDonalds also argued that consumers know coffee is hot and that its customers want it that way. The company admitted its customers were unaware that they could suffer third degree burns from the coffee and that a statement on the side of the cup was not a "warning" but a "reminder" since the location of the writing would not warn customers of the hazard. Legal Decisions: The jury awarded Liebeck $200,000 in compensatory damages. This amount was reduced to $160,000 because the jury found Liebeck 20 percent at fault in the spill. The jury also awarded Liebeck $2.7 million in punitive damages, which equals about two days of McDonalds' coffee sales. The trial court subsequently reduced the punitive award to $480,000 -- or three times compensatory damages -- even though the judge called McDonalds' conduct reckless, callous and willful. The parties eventually entered into a secret settlement which has never been revealed to the public, despite the fact that this was a public case, litigated in public and subjected to extensive media......

Words: 1823 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Constitutional Safeguards

...been arrested, the officer sees something in plain sight and search property where the officer feels that there may be danger to their self or the suspect. When it comes to juveniles there are restrictions on this amendment. Only juveniles under age 18 that have been accused of criminal conduct are granted the 4th amendment rights. If the juvenile is being accused of non-criminal behavior the constitution has not been defined (Kenneth T. Hanley, Fourth Amendment Protection for the Juvenile Offender: State, Fordham L. Rev. 1140, 1981). The 5th Amendment states that “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation." When it comes to juveniles courts this law is also with up held. The 6th Amendment states “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously......

Words: 759 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Study Guide

...appeal an FCC ruling at the Federal Court of appeals for District of Columbia. 6. Jurisdiction- States District of Columbia Federal Military U.S. territories There are appellate and trial courts within. U.S. supreme court is an appellate court. District court is the lowest level; jury trials. Appellate court is the second level; several states in a region. 7. The supreme court has two jurisdictions original jurisdiction- (rare) Acts like a trial court. First time a case is heard. The outcome has to set precedent. In trial court- factual record is established, witnesses, testimony. Etc. appellate jurisdiction- through: appeal – only about 4 to 8 % of cases. Or 2. writ of certiorari- have to have exhausted all proceedings and 4 out of 9 justices have to agree to hear your case. 3. writ of certification- lower court filing this motion, because needs guidance. In case of a tie, the lower court ruling stands. They maintain right to attend and report on preliminary hearings. Some judges will strike evidence from jury because damaging testimony agaisnt defendant may not be admissible in court. What gets reported from hearings at pretrial is not heard by the jury, therefore could affect their bias, or decision. Plaintiff v defendant and the year of the decision The president gets to nominate he nominates people who share ideology, values, and parties(sometimes) because he is extending realm of influence (5 year term) He nominates IRAs and......

Words: 1709 - Pages: 7

Free Essay


...valiant warrior. In the beginning, they both began as characters that cared about the common good of their people. Both characters were similar in the sense that they showed traits of a leader who fights for justice and show that they care about the good of their people. Soon both stories begin to unfold and we begin to see how malicious Macbeth is, Macbeth shows the reader that he put his own priorities before the people of Scotland by murdering the beloved king Duncan and in this case left the kingdom in jeopardy. Atticus is different because he is willing to put his family in danger to defend a innocent man and look past his skin color. He put Tom Robinson’s priorities before his. In the end both characters unveil their true personalities. Macbeth realizes that he made the wrong choices .He fights to his bitter death even when everyone is against him and dies. Atticus on the other hand knew the jury was still going to convict Tom Robinson of rape. We learn that everyone has a evil inside of them, it teaches us that inside of us there is greater evil that cannot be tamed or in this case be hidden, it is a fight that can never be won. In the beginning both characters begin as mirror images of themselves in the sense that, they portray traits of a leader who fights for justice and showed that they care about the good of their people. Atticus was a respected lawyer; conflict arose when Mr. Finch, a white male took up the case to represent the African American worker who......

Words: 939 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Find Out

...of institutions such as democratically elected parliaments, the rule of law, trial by jury, an independent judiciary, and the need to protect them. Another important reason is that history provides us with a frame of reference that enables us to recognise dangers to our society, both from within and externally, and it provides guidance as to how to deal with those dangers when they arise. I believe that it was the English philosopher Roger Scruton who said that denying children a solid grounding in the history of their country was calculated to produce a generation of gentle sheep that could be easily led by their political masters. I agree completely with that view. [pic] Darwin burns as Japanese bombers attack Australia on 19 February 1942. The study of history provides us with a frame of reference that enables us to recognise dangers to our society, both from within and externally, and it provides guidance as to how to deal with those dangers when they arise. I am sometimes asked about the apparent incongruity of a lawyer writing history. While by no means suggesting that legal experience is essential for historians, I would argue that my background in public law and politics is a valuable grounding for historical research and writing history. A Crown prosecutor spends a great deal of time assimilating facts and analysing them impartially with a view to laying them before a judge or jury to support one or more findings of fact. Knowledge of constitutional law, legal......

Words: 943 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Legal Methods

...amount of controversy. Based on each state’s common law for state courts or federal law for federal courts. (1) Federal Law exception – federal courts also have jurisdiction in cases involving diversity jurisdiction or amount in controversy is over $75,000. b. Personal jurisdiction – Court only able to try individual in its scope. (1) Long-Arm statutes – have expanded actions throughout state. (2) Implied Consent – Used to make drivers subject to personal jurisdiction. C. Picking a forum is strategic and based on things as: which forum’s rules will best aid your client, which forum will be quickest, and which provides the most favorable jury. III. Step Three – Bringing the Suit A. First step to filing a suit is to file a complaint with one of the following ways: 1. File and Serve State – file complaint in state court, then serve a summons on other party directing him/her to appear in court to answer complaint and offers a copy of the complaint. 2. Serve and File State – serve the other party with summons and complaint first and later file complaint with the court. B. The Complaint – informs parties as well as provides what relief is being sought. Allows the other party to respond to it, possibly just writing a check to you, resolving matter without going to court. 1. Default Judgment – If other party ignores the......

Words: 19745 - Pages: 79

Premium Essay

Tort, specifically the “implied warranty of fitness [that is] imposed by the Uniform Commercial Code” (Morgan, n.d.). What did the Jury decide? The jury decided to award Liebeck $200,000 for compensatory damages. They also penalized McDonald’s $2,700,000 as punishment (Fleisher-Black, 2004). Did the jury make an appropriate decision? Based on the evidence presented, the jury made the right decision; however, the amount of the punitive damages awarded was high when considering New Mexico statutes and court rules. McDonald’s has a history of burn complaints from coffee and even though McDonald’s was aware of the problem; McDonald’s refused to either warn its customers or lower the temperature of the coffee. This proved that McDonald’s knew about this situation and makes it easy to prove negligence for failure to warn (Kubasek, Brennan, and Browne in Hartigan, ed., 2004, p. 172). Gerlin stated that Morgan “suggested penalizing McDonald’s the equivalent of one to two days of companywide coffee sales” (1994). This is contradictory to the statement found in chapter 8, Contracts and UCC Sales, section13-861, punitive damages that states “the amount awarded, if any, must be reasonably related to the injury and to the damages given as compensation and not disproportionate to the circumstances” (New Mexico Compilation Commission, n.d.). The jury had awarded the punitive damages based on the McDonald’s sales and not on the damages brought to the plaintiff; therefore the......

Words: 1528 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Necessity be resorted to only in very special circumstances. The reason for such circumspection is clear - necessity can very easily become simply a mask for anarchy." Whilst there has been no general recognition of necessity as a defence, it has been permitted to operate under various guises, on a piecemeal basis, for example, in medical cases: * In R v Bourne [1939] 1 KB 687, the defendant gynaecologist performed an abortion on a young girl who had been raped. He had formed the opinion that she could die if permitted to give birth, and the operation was performed in a public hospital, with the consent of her parents. The defendant was found not guilty of "unlawfully procuring a miscarriage" following a direction from the trial judge to the jury that a defendant did not act "unlawfully" for the purposes of s58 Offences Against the Person Act 1861, where he acted in good faith, in the exercise of his clinical judgement. (This is now within the Abortion Act 1967.) However, necessity may never be a defence to a charge of murder. In R v Howe [1987] AC 417, the House of Lords affirmed Dudley and Stephens (1884). THE PRAGMATIC APPROACH (a) The practical solution perhaps lies in the way in which the discretion to prosecute is exercised. Lord Denning, in Buckoke v GLC [1971], stated obiter that the driver of an emergency service vehicle who drove through a red traffic signal when responding to an emergency call, whilst he would not be able to rely on the defence of necessity,......

Words: 1991 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Jury Nullification Paper

...Jury Nullification Paper April 25, 2011 Jury Nullification defined when juries believe a case is unjust or wrong and may acquit a defendant who violated the law. Jury nullification has been an option of a jury in the United States. The jury play a fundamental role in upholding and interpreting the laws the founders of American government outlined in that most sacred of documents. Today society find it imperative to question to what extent a jury may take these laws and make them their own. That a jury may so easily subject laws created through intense discussion and hindsight to so capricious a dismissal leads to question whether jury nullification, in fact undermines the rule of law imbedded in the American Constitution. Seen in this light it is not strange that the courts in the past and the present have discouraged it. At no time juries conferred with lawmaking authority, yet the repeated use of jury nullification results in the altercation of laws made by the proper government bodies. The over-use of jury nullification would result in the weakening of the American democratic system. Racial-based jury nullification has been an ongoing debate for quite some time. Though jury nullification involves members of the jury interpreting the law and coming up with an agreement of what they believe is the best......

Words: 1321 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay


...significant departure from the other elements, duty is the only element decided first by the court, while each of the other elements is determined by the jury. Duty is best determined by the court to limit the notion of a “universal duty” of care a jury might find more easily than a judge when considering overall “policy” objectives. In the Palsgraf case, the Long Island Railroad was not liable for negligence because Justice Cardozo determined that she was not a foreseeable plaintiff, stating that the conduct of the plaintiff’s guard might have done wrong to the person being helped aboard the train by the train’s employees, but that action was not a wrong in its relation to the plaintiff, standing far away. Cardozo went on to state:“ Negligence is not actionable unless it involves the invasion of a legally protected interest, the violation of a right” and that “proof of negligence in the air, so to speak, will not do.” Also in the opinion, “the ideas of negligence and duty are strictly correlative….(t)he plaintiff sues in her own right for a wrong personal to her, and not as the vicarious beneficiary of a breach of duty to another.” Case law places a high degree of importance on the fact that the negligence must be relational to the plaintiff in what Cardozo describes as the “danger zone,” commonly referred to as the zone of danger. So, it is not so much whether the plaintiff was foreseeable, but whether the foreseeability issue was connected to the question of duty or......

Words: 3700 - Pages: 15