Premium Essay

Kant Immanual

In: Philosophy and Psychology

Submitted By ewhaler
Words 497
Pages 2
Emily Whaler
12 July 2014
Explain Kant’s distinction between a hypothetical imperative and a categorical imperative. Why does Kant think that all moral commands are categorical rather than hypothetical? What does it mean to act from a good will? Do you agree or disagree with Kant that only actions performed from a good will have moral value?
Immanuel Kant
Imperatives are commands in which Kant distinguishes between hypothetical and categorical imperatives. A hypothetical imperative is one that is relative. It takes the form of “If this, then that.” (333) This kind of imperative is not universal or absolute since they are conditioned on a relevant desire or greater achievement out of one’s self-interest. On the other hand, a categorical imperative deals with universalizability and strips away the emotions that bind a hypothetical imperative. Kant uses a formula in order to determine if an imperative is categorical. “Act as if the maxim of thy action were to become a universal law of nature.” (334) Kant suggests that if the command can be made a rule for all of mankind then it is categorical since this would make it universally binding. Kant thinks that all moral commands are categorical rather than hypothetical because only when one is motivated by morality can he have moral worth. This is because morality is not fixed in consequences that may arise, however, it is out of a person’s duty to fulfill that job regardless of their emotional state or desires, which defies a hypothetical imperative.
To act from a good will, according to Kant, depends on ones motives. He says that “ought implies can,” in which a person can be motivated to do an abundance of good, but is limited by factors such as finance or physical well-being. (330) In this case a person would be considered good with good motives despite their inability to produce a good outcome. However, someone…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Immanual Kant Deontology Presentation

...Immanuel Kant Presentation Deontology – Deon-duty, logos -science Because we so regularly take it for granted that moral values are closely related with the goal of human well-being or happiness Kant's claim that these two ideas are absolutely separate makes it difficult to grasp his point of view and easy to misunderstand it. "Nothing can possibly be conceived in the world, or even out of it, which can be called good without qualification, except a good will." What does Kant mean by a "good will"? A "good will" means to act out of a purpose of moral obligation or "duty". In other words, the moral person does a certain action not because of its consequences, but because she comprehends by reasoning that it is morally the right thing to do and so believes herself as having a moral duty or obligation to do that action. One may of course as an added fact get some enjoyment or other reward from doing the right thing, but to act morally, one does not do it for the sake of its desirable results, but because one recognizes that it is morally the right thing to do. When does one act from a motive of doing one's duty? Kant replies that we do our moral duty when our purpose is controlled by a belief recognized by reason rather than the want for any expected result or emotional reasons for our actions. Kant believes that there are only 2 types of motivations 1. Ones that are clear recognition of one’s duties. 2. Selfish one This includes those people that......

Words: 1421 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

The Categorical Imperative

...Imperative Immanual Kant Kant argues that all imperatives are commanded either hypothetically or categorically. The hypothetical imperative says that an action is good only as a means to something else. Hypothetical imperatives tell us about which means will be best to achieve our ends; however, they do not tell us anything about the ends we should choose. The categorical imperative says one should act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law. In other words, Kant is saying that the nature of a moral act is one which would be the right thing to do for any person in similar circumstances. An example Kant uses to explain this theory involves a man who finds himself in need of money and plans to borrow money but he knows that he will not be able to repay the lender. When we consider how it would be if his maxim became a universal law we see that it is contradicting. A law that says that anyone can promise something with the intention of not fulfilling it would make the promise and its end to be accomplished by it impossible. He goes on to explain that “things” have only a relative worth as means while on the other hand rational beings are designated “persons,” because they are ends themselves and may not be used merely as means. The practical imperative states that you act so that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in that of another, always as an end and never as a means only. According to......

Words: 297 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Describe the Importance of Quality Leadership and the Difference Between Leadership and Management Within a Health and Social Care Environment, and Explain the Ethical Value Framework Leaders of Services Should Adhere to

...test) instead of relationship orientated I have learnt to focus on the task we are doing rather than the personal relationship. I have passed this conception on to other workers and although the registered nurse is still not the easiest individual to work with, although understanding her leadership style has a positive effect on working relationships. According to Northouse there are five principles of ethical leadership. The five principles deliver a basis for positive ethical leadership. Northouse believed that to be a decent ethical leader an individual must follow these principles. The first principle is that ethical leaders respect others. Immanual Kant identified that if an individual wants to be respected then they must have respect for others and that the individual should treat others how they wish others to treat them. Kant also stated that people should be treated with respect for the sake of being respected and not for the personal gain of any individual or organisation. (Schneewind, 2001) As an ethical leader within a health and social care setting this should be applied to all workers at all levels, clients and all visitors. A sound ethical leader must maintain other people’s confidence. If they are told something in confidence then it should be kept that way (unless it poses a risk to someone or something) and not used as idle gossip. In my professional experience I once worked for a manager who if was told something in confidence by a member of staff, the......

Words: 3756 - Pages: 16

Premium Essay

Describe the Main Principles of the Two Normative Ethical Theories of Deontology and Utilitarianism. Compare and Contrast the Two Theories, Bringing Out Any Problems or Limitations You See in Each.

...justify your own views with reasons – don’t just state your opinions without arguing for them in terms of moral values. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-deontological/#DeoTheKan http://www.slideshare.net/kljonz/individual-ethics-essay-1 There are two major ethics theories that attempt to specify and justify moral rules and principles; these are utilitarianism and deontological ethics. Utilitarianism (also known as consequentialism) is a moral theory developed and refined in the modern world in the writings of Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) and John Stuart Mill (1806-1873).(1) Deontology is a ??? theory developed from the eighteenth century philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724-1804). The theory utilitarianism is the morality of an act that is judged by it’s utility. The greatest utility that is has for the most people; the greatest usefulness an act has for the most people. Utilitarianism states morality is not based in the act itself but in the consequences of the act. The utilitarian approach to morality implies that no moral act or rule is intrinsically right or wrong; it is the rightness or wrongness of an act or rule that is solely a matter of the overall nonmoral good (pleasure, happiness, health, knowledge, or satisfaction of individual desire) produced in the consequences of doing that act or following that rule. In sum, according to utilitarianism, morality is a matter of the nonmoral good......

Words: 1646 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Business Ethics and Moral Philosophy

...the sum total of utilities produced if everyone were to follow that rule is greater than the sum total utilities produced if everyone were to follow some alternative rule. II. Deontology — rights of individuals (non-consequentialist theories) • Equal respect must be given to all persons. • There are some things that should not be done, even to maximize utility. • Individuals have certain absolute rights: freedom of conscience, freedom of consent, freedom of speech, etc. • Rights have corresponding “duties.” • Teleological philosophies consider the ENDS associated with an action and deontological philosophies consider the MEANS associated with an action. Deontology (Kant’s Categorical Imperative)-- Immanual Kant’s theory is based on the “reasonable man.” Kant assumes that reason is the same for every individual and this means that what is moral should be the same for each person. When people choose to act the way reason demands, they will act morally. Right — absence of prohibitions; authorized or empowered; prohibitions or requirements on others that enable the individual to pursue certain interests for activities - Negative rights —duties others have not to interfere in certain activities of the person who holds a given right - Positive rights — some other agents have the positive duty of providing the holder of the right with whatever he or she needs to freely pursue his or her interests Three principles of the categorical imperative......

Words: 1277 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Why We Should Study Business?Including Its Success, Failure, History and Principels.

...Ethics as a field of thought has existed in religion and philosophy for thousands of years and has been applied to business activities in the same way ethical values and norms have been applied to everyday life. Aristotle discussed economic activities, commerce, and trade. He makes normative judgments about greed, or the unnatural use of one’s capabilities, in the pursuit of wealth for its own sake. Aristotle provides the first recorded definition of justice and fair treatment of all parties in a transaction (Aristotle, 2000; DeGeorge, 2007). Fair treatment and justice have been a part of our social existence since the beginning of civilization. Other contributors to the foundation of business ethics include John Stuart Mill (1863), Immanual Kant (1899), and G.W.F. Hegel (1820). These philosophers wrote on economic fairness, especially distributive justice (DeGeorge, 2007). Karl Marx deserves mention because he took an anti-capitalism position and claimed capitalism could be morally condemned because of exploitation. Most contemporary timelines, such as the Ethics Resource Center Timeline (Figure 2) trace the history of business ethics issues since 1960. Although we will attempt to trace the history since 1960, it is appropriate to start by tracing the origins of business ethics thought over the past 100 years. The first managerial textbook on business ethics was Business Ethics by Frank Chapman Sharp and Phillip D. Fox (1937). The preface starts off with the statement “this......

Words: 1717 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

A Review of Ethics Concepts & Theories

...A Review of Ethics Concepts & Theories Educational Objectives: 1. Explain the type of problem that is addressed by philosophers. 2. Explain how ethical norms help address ethical issues that arise in accountancy. 3. Contrast the views of Mills, Machiavelli and Kant. 4. Describe what is meant by a social contract. 5. Analyze a given situation and tell why it would be appropriate or inappropriate to lie. 6. Explain the views of Kierkegaard and contrast him from other existentialists. 7. Discuss the concept that ethics cannot be based on religion. 8. Explain the use of ethical reasoning and how it can be used in your professional life. Introduction The major ethical principles accepted in the western world follow guidelines and rules that must be universally applied in all situations. These ethical principles are established primarily on the basis of teachings set forth by philosophers throughout the ages, starting with the great Greek thinkers Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle. As you might expect, there have been many alterations 修改 to these moral principles throughout the years. What was considered ethically correct by some was rejected by others and replaced with their own concept of what constituted moral or ethical behavior. A Comment about Philosophy: Philosophy, unlike science, addresses issues that cannot be solved. In fact, some philosophers state that if a problem can be solved, philosophers will not......

Words: 2657 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

And Justice for All

...“reform” he himself; “I have no desire to reform myself. My one and only desire is to reform people who try to reform me. And I believe that the only way to reform people is to kill ‘em. My motto is, rob ‘em all, rape ‘em all, and kill ‘em all.” Notorious serial killer Ted Bundy was quoted saying, “I didn’t know what made people want to be friends, what made them attracted to each other. I don’t feel guilt for anything. I feel sorry for people who feel guilt.” How is someone like this supposed to ever be able to join society and live among others? The argument over morality of capital punishment has been fiercely debated over the years. The opposition says it is immoral to take the life of any citizen, under any circumstance. Immanual Kant, a German philosopher considered to be a central figure of modern philosophy, said, “a society that is not willing to demand a life of somebody who has taken somebody else’s life is simply immoral.”(Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy) It is immoral to not properly punish an offender who has committed a crime worthy of being tried for capital punishment. Since opponents of capital punishment views it as ‘cruel and unusual’, and therefore breaks a offenders constitutional rights, as stated earlier, the recipient of capital punishment is not tortured in any way. The Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld the death penalty as constitutional. Noted in thelegldictonary.org; the case of Furman vs. Georgia, “The punishment of......

Words: 1781 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Introduction to Business Ethics

...organization in which you work. Immanuel Kant and Deontology Immanual Kant (1724-1804), like so many other Enlightenment thinkers, dabbled in many different disciplines. His early works concerned physics and astronomy and in 1755, he predicted the existence of the planet Uranus, which was not to be discovered until 1881. He is best known, however, for his philosophical writings, and is regarded by many as the greatest philosopher of the last three hundred years. Kant, unlike Aristotle, did not believe that actions are to conform to virtue so as to maintain an individual's character. Instead, he believed that nature offers up a Supreme Principle of Morality that binds all rational creatures, by way of duty, to act according to a categorical imperative. This duty or obligation to act is the cornerstone of deontological ethics. A categorical imperative is a requirement that binds all people, regardless of their own inclinations or the possible consequences. For example, it might be said that there are no conditions under which it is permitted to lie. This would include circumstances in which a person is inclined to lie and in which lying would lead to unwanted consequences. According to Kant, it is not an action that is moral or not, but the subjective principle, or maxim, that......

Words: 4762 - Pages: 20

Premium Essay

Professional Ethics

...The best solution is achieved through reason and logic and is a compromise or “golden mean” between extremes of excess and deficiency. For example, in the case of the environment, the golden mean between the extremes of neglect and exploitation might be protection. Problem: Variability from one person to another in their powers of reasoning and the difficulty in applying the theory to ethical problems. 2. “Rights – based” ethics (John Locke, 1632 – 1704). Every person is free and equal and has the right to life, health, liberty and possessions (in effect prohibiting capital punishment, medical charges, jails and income taxes). Problem: One person’s right may be in conflict with another’s rights. 3. “Duty – based” ethics (Immanual Kant, 1724 – 1804). Each person has a duty to follow a course of action that would be universally acceptable for everyone to follow without exception. (Thus we would all be honest, kind, generous and peaceful). Problem: Universal application of a rule can be harmful. 4. “Utilitarian” ethics (John Stuart Mill, 1806 – 1873). The best choice is that which produces the maximum benefit for the greatest number of people (which could endanger minority rights). Problem: Qualification of the benefits can be difficult. All these theories can be differentiated on the basis of what they provide for moral concept, good results for all, duties and human rights. SELF – INTEREST, CUSTOMS AND RELIGION Moral justifications and principles......

Words: 7443 - Pages: 30

Premium Essay

Computer Ethics

...ethics as a field of study. Let us briefly consider five such attempts: When he decided to use the term "computer ethics" in the mid-70s, Walter Maner defined the field as one which examines "ethical problems aggravated, transformed or created by computer technology". Some old ethical problems, he said, are made worse by computers, while others are wholly new because of information technology. By analogy with the more developed field of medical ethics, Maner focused attention upon applications of traditional ethical theories used by philosophers doing "applied ethics" -- especially analyses using the utilitarian ethics of the English philosophers Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, or the rationalist ethics of the German philosopher Immanual Kant. In her book, Computer Ethics, Deborah Johnson [1985] defined the field as one which studies the way in which computers "pose new versions of standard moral problems and moral dilemmas, exacerbating the old problems, and forcing us to apply ordinary moral norms in uncharted realms," [Johnson, page 1]. Like Maner before her, Johnson recommended the "applied ethics" approach of using procedures and concepts from utilitarianism and Kantianism. But, unlike Maner, she did not believe that computers create wholly new moral problems. Rather, she thought that computers gave a "new twist" to old ethical issues which were already well known. James Moor's definition of computer ethics in his article "What Is Computer Ethics?" [Moor, 1985]......

Words: 6774 - Pages: 28

Premium Essay

Communication

...questionable ways. Do you speak up when a colleague makes promises to clients that you know the company can’t keep? Should you challenge your boss when he or she treats other employees unfairly or illegally? It has been said that ethics centers on a sense of responsibility for someone other than yourself.22 A blanket obligation to communicate ethically can be too vague to be helpful in specific situations. Five philosophical principles offer standards that can help you decide how to behave in a principled manner:23 11 12 Part One Strategic Case Please confirm this settings. Utilitarian Approach (Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill): Does this action provide the greatest good for the greatest number? Rights Approach (Immanual Kant): Does this action respect the moral rights (truth, privacy, non-injury, promises) of everyone? Fairness or Justice Approach (Aristotle, John Rawls): Is this action fair and free of discrimination or favoritism? Common-Good Approach (Plato, Aristotle, Cicero, John Rawls): Does the action further the common or community good? Virtue Approach: Does this action promote the development of moral virtue (character) in me and my community? Two additional guidelines can help you evaluate whether you are behaving ethically: Professional Ethic: How would this action be judged by an impartial jury of your professional peers? Publicity Test: Would you be comfortable having the public learn about your behavior in the broadcast or print......

Words: 14462 - Pages: 58

Premium Essay

Moral Paper

...Haber, Absolutism and Its Consequentialist Critics (1994). WHERE DO I STAND ON ABSOLUTISM? COMMENTS:  Agree  Disagree  Undecided Kantian Ethics • • • • Major Premises: There are universal moral laws that apply to all persons; human beings have intrinsic worth; persons should be treated as ends in themselves and not as instrumental means serving the ends of others; human worth is based on the superior faculty of reason. Strengths: Respects human dignity; respects human capacity for reason. Weaknesses: No accommodation for the value of nonhuman species. Authors and Texts: Onora O’Neill, Kantian Ethics in A Companion to Ethics, edited by Peter Singer (1991); Immanual Kant, Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals, translated by Lewis White Beck (1959); Immanuel Kant, Critique of Practical Reason, translated by Lewis White Beck (1964). WHERE DO I STAND ON KANTIAN ETHICS? COMMENTS:  Agree  Disagree  Undecided Leadership Ethics Course Manual ~ © 2005 Lindsay J Thompson ~ All rights reserved 47 Social Contract Ethics • • • • Major Premises: Morality is a social contract or rules established by rational people who agree to accept and follow them for their mutual benefit; these rules apply equally to all; the contract is only binding as long as all parties adhere to it. Strengths: Establishes a social basis for individual morality; does not rely on universal or objective determination of moral value; allows a moral......

Words: 29833 - Pages: 120

Premium Essay

Why Am I

... | Week 1 Introduction Hi! It's Week 1, and we're set to go. This course is perhaps a little different from the typical MBA course. Rather than studying the internal workings of a business, we shall instead delve into the legal, political, and social cultures of our city, nation, and world and see how these affect everything we do in business. We shall study the gamut of legal concepts, from product liability, to civil rights, to intellectual property rights, to antitrust and consumer protection. Underpinning all of these legal concepts, however, will be two foundational aspects: (a) the ethical issues within, and (b) the "world view" without. Milton Friedman, Immanual Kant, Blanchard and Peale, Laura Nash . . . these are just a few of the names of ethicists and business people about whom you will study and learn. During Week 1, we begin the process of sorting out how we feel about business social responsibility. We shall consider this question: Does business have a social responsibility beyond maximization of profits, and if so, how does business fulfill a corporate social responsibility? We will also begin considering how our behavior affects everyone in the entire world. The world-view of business is becoming quite the norm rather than the exception. Please, join me inside. . . . |[pi|Week 1: Business Ethics and International Responsibility - Assignments | ...

Words: 32680 - Pages: 131

Premium Essay

Will Do Next Time

...are considered to have historical significance and enduring cultural impact. In like fashion, we’ve created our own list of essentials—theories we believe are indispensable in a course on communication theory. Along with Em, we each created a set of two lists—our top 15 and top 20. If the demands of your semester require you to scale back the number of theories you can teach, these lists may be helpful in determining what to include and what to leave out. In addition, we consider Chapters 1-3 and 36 essential, no matter how many theories are taught, and believe that every section introduction should be assigned, even if only one theory from that context is covered. In addition, Em would push for five ethical reflections to be incorporated (Kant, Buber, Aristotle, Habermas, and Gilligan). Not surprisingly, our lists have many similarities but also points of departure based on our own experiences, pedagogical practices, and personal xxiii ideologies. The ultimate decision is up to you, but we hope these lists will stimulate discussion. xxiv Our Essential Theories Em Emily Glen Symbolic Interactionism (Mead) µ µ µ 5 Coordinated Management of Meaning (Pearce & Cronen) µ µ µ 6 Expectancy Violations Theory (Burgoon) µ 20  20 7 Interpersonal Deception Theory (Buller & Burgoon) 8 Social Penetration Theory (Altman & Taylor) 9 Uncertainty Reduction Theory (Berger) µ µ µ 10 11 Social Information Processing Theory (Walther) Relational Dialectics (Baxter &......

Words: 159106 - Pages: 637