Free Essay

# Lab Predator Prey Interactions: Bean Simulation

In: Science

Submitted By mpanay
Words 656
Pages 3
-------------------------------------------------
Lab # 1
-------------------------------------------------
Predator Prey Interactions: Bean simulation

Enviornmental Science November 1, 2014

Objective:

To keep record of the effects that the predator (coyote) and prey (mice) have on the population of each other over time.

Introduction:

Interactions between predators and their prey are important in 1) determining the population of both predators and prey and 2) determining and maintaining the structure of a community. Many factors enter into the ultimate outcome of predator-prey interactions. Using a simulation of predator-prey interaction including mice and coyote will be conducted to determine population over time in their habitat.

Materials:

* Shallow plate (the field) * Beans (the mice) * Spoons (the coyotes)

Procedure:

1. Shake the plate to randomly distribute the mice. 2. Swipe the spoon through the field and capture mice. 3. Record data
Mice
Minimum mice per generation = 10
Maximum mice per generation = 100
Mice double every generation OR hit 100
Capture less than 5 mice and coyote dies
Capture 5 or more and coyote survives
Coyote
5 or more survive
6-9 mice = 1 baby
10-14 mice = 2 babies
15 or more = 3 babies
Minimum coyote = 1
Maximum coyote = 17

Results

Quantitative Results

Generation Number | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Initial Mice | 10 | 18 | 30 | 48 | 76 | 100 | 100 | 20 | 10 | 14 | 18 | 12 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Initial Coyote | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 12 | 17 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | # of mice caught by each coyote (#1 - # 12) | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 12 | 13 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 6 | | 2 | | | | 4 | 5 | 12 | 7 | 2 | | | 5 | 2 | | 3 | 2 | | 4 | 3 | | 3 | | 3 | | | | | | 12 | 10 | 2 | | | | 2 | | | 4 | | | 2 | | | | 4 | | | | | | 11 | 9 | 3 | | | | 3 | | | | | | | | | | 5 | | | | | | | 10 | 4 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6 | | | | | | | 8 | 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7 | | | | | | | 9 | 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8 | | | | | | | 8 | 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9 | | | | | | | 7 | 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10 | | | | | | | 4 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11 | | | | | | | 3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12 | | | | | | | 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Captured Mice | 1 | 3 | 6 | 10 | 13 | 47 | 90 | 20 | 3 | 5 | 12 | 10 | 5 | 8 | 9 | 6 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 9 | Surviving Mice | 9 | 15 | 24 | 38 | 63 | 53 | 10 | 0 | 7 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | Surviving Coyote | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | Coyote offspring | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |

Qualitative Results

As the coyote ate all the mice the mice population vanished which also drastically affected the coyote population because without the prey the predator could not survive.

Conclusion

In conclusion the first population to show an increase in numbers was the mice population because they multiply faster when they know there is a predator, in nature all the type of mice might not survive but only the strongest and wiser will, which is why the mice population (the prey) were the highest in population. Over the course of the 20 years you I noticed the amount of mice captured and surviving increased and towards the end of the generations they remained low but steady because those are the mice that will continue to survive in nature. The population of the coyote remain about the same throughout time with only slight changed which is normal. As the population in coyote decreased the mouse increased and visa versa because the predator rely on the prey. The graph which represents surviving coyote vs. captured mice best illustrates the relationship between changes in mice population relative to changes in coyote population because in this graph you can clearly see “predators increase when prey are abundant, prey are driven to low numbers by predation, the predators decline, and the prey recover, ad infinitum.”

Works Cited

http://www.globalchange.umich.edu/globalchange1/current/lectures/predation/predation.html

### Similar Documents

#### Philosophy and Design

...Philosophy and Design Pieter E. Vermaas • Peter Kroes Andrew Light • Steven A. Moore Philosophy and Design From Engineering to Architecture Pieter E. Vermaas Delft University of Technology Delft the Netherlands Andrew Light University of Washington Seattle USA Peter Kroes Delft University of Technology Delft the Netherlands Steven A. Moore University of Texas Austin USA ISBN 978-1-4020-6590-3 e-ISBN 978-1-4020-6591-0 Library of Congress Control Number: 2007937486 © 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V. No part of this work may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording or otherwise, without written permission from the Publisher, with the exception of any material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Printed on acid-free paper. 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 springer.com Contents List of Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Design in Engineering and Architecture: Towards an Integrated Philosophical Understanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Peter Kroes, Andrew Light, Steven A. Moore, and Pieter E. Vermaas Part I Engineering Design ix 1 Design, Use, and the Physical and Intentional Aspects of Technical Artifacts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...

Words: 165744 - Pages: 663

#### Rgthtfhyjugkihlololigkydh

...Table of Contents Title Page Copyright Page Dedication Introduction Chapter 1 - Priming Chapter 2 - Confabulation Chapter 3 - Confirmation Bias Chapter 4 - Hindsight Bias Chapter 5 - The Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy Chapter 6 - Procrastination Chapter 7 - Normalcy Bias Chapter 8 - Introspection Chapter 9 - The Availability Heuristic Chapter 10 - The Bystander Effect Chapter 11 - The Dunning-Kruger Effect Chapter 12 - Apophenia Chapter 13 - Brand Loyalty Chapter 14 - The Argument from Authority Chapter 15 - The Argument from Ignorance Chapter 16 - The Straw Man Fallacy Chapter 17 - The Ad Hominem Fallacy Chapter 18 - The Just-World Fallacy Chapter 19 - The Public Goods Game Chapter 20 - The Ultimatum Game Chapter 21 - Subjective Validation Chapter 22 - Cult Indoctrination Chapter 23 - Groupthink Chapter 24 - Supernormal Releasers Chapter 25 - The Affect Heuristic Chapter 26 - Dunbar’s Number Chapter 27 - Selling Out Chapter 28 - Self-Serving Bias Chapter 29 - The Spotlight Effect Chapter 30 - The Third Person Effect Chapter 31 - Catharsis Chapter 32 - The Misinformation Effect Chapter 33 - Conformity Chapter 34 - Extinction Burst Chapter 35 - Social Loafing Chapter 36 - The Illusion of Transparency Chapter 37 - Learned Helplessness Chapter 38 - Embodied Cognition Chapter 39 - The Anchoring Effect Chapter 40 - Attention Chapter 41 - Self-Handicapping Chapter 42 - Self-Fulfilling Prophecies Chapter 43 - The Moment Chapter 44 -......

Words: 84394 - Pages: 338

Free Essay

#### Book

...THE PLAYER Good game design is player-centric. That means that above all else, the player and her desires are truly considered. Rather than demanding that she do something via the rules, the gameplay itself should inherently motivate the player in the direction the designer wants her to go. Telling players they must travel around the board or advance to the next level is one thing. If they don’t have a reason and a desire to do it, then it becomes torture. In creating a game, designers take a step back and think from the player’s viewpoint: What’s this game about? How do I play? How do I win? Why do I want to play? What things do I need to do? MEANINGFUL DECISIONS Distilled down to its essence, game design is about creating opportunities for players to make meaningful decisions that affect the outcome of the game. Consider a game like a boxing match. So many decisions lead up to the ultimate victory. How long will I train? Will I block or will I swing? What is my opponent going to do? Where is his weakness? Jab left or right? Even those few, brief questions don’t come close to the myriad decisions a fighter must make as he progresses through a match. Games invite players into similar mental spaces. Games like Tetris and Chess keep our minds busy by forcing us to consider which one of several possible moves we want to take next. In taking these paths, we know that we may be prolonging or completely screwing up our entire game. The Sims games and those in...

Words: 111961 - Pages: 448

Free Essay

#### Gmat

Words: 234594 - Pages: 939

Words: 193447 - Pages: 774

Free Essay

#### Gre Vocabulary 3000

...Made By Jason & Franklin. This Document Is Strictly Prohibited For Commercial Purposes Without Authorization. List 1 GRE Verbal 750 Quantitative 800, AW 5.5 2008 10 Princeton, MIT, M. Fin Unit 1 ABANDON A B D I C AT E ABASE ABERRANT ABASH ABET A B AT E A B E YA N C E A B B R E V I AT E ABHOR abandon [ 1 n. ] carefree, freedom from constraint added spices to the stew with complete abandon unconstraint, uninhibitedness, unrestraint 2 v. to give (oneself) over unrestrainedly abandon herself to a life of complete idleness abandon oneself to emotion indulge, surrender, give up 3 v. to withdraw from often in the face of danger or encroachment abandon the ship/homes salvage 4 v. to put an end to (something planned or previously agreed to) NASA the bad weather forced NASA to abandon the launch abort, drop, repeal, rescind, revoke, call off keep, continue, maintain, carry on abase [ 1 v. ] to lower in rank, office, prestige, or esteem was unwilling to abase himself by pleading guilty to a crime that he did not commit debauch, degrade, profane, vitiate, discredit, foul, smirch, take down elevate, ennoble, uplift, aggrandize, canonize, deify, exalt abash [ 1 vt. ] to destroy the self-possession or self-confidence of ,disconcert, embarrass Nothing could abash him. discomfit, disconcert, discountenance, faze, fluster, nonplus, mortify embolden abate [ 1 v. ] to reduce in degree or intensity / abate his rage/pain taper off intensify 2......

Words: 139628 - Pages: 559

Free Essay

#### Test2

...62118 0/nm 1/n1 2/nm 3/nm 4/nm 5/nm 6/nm 7/nm 8/nm 9/nm 1990s 0th/pt 1st/p 1th/tc 2nd/p 2th/tc 3rd/p 3th/tc 4th/pt 5th/pt 6th/pt 7th/pt 8th/pt 9th/pt 0s/pt a A AA AAA Aachen/M aardvark/SM Aaren/M Aarhus/M Aarika/M Aaron/M AB aback abacus/SM abaft Abagael/M Abagail/M abalone/SM abandoner/M abandon/LGDRS abandonment/SM abase/LGDSR abasement/S abaser/M abashed/UY abashment/MS abash/SDLG abate/DSRLG abated/U abatement/MS abater/M abattoir/SM Abba/M Abbe/M abbé/S abbess/SM Abbey/M abbey/MS Abbie/M Abbi/M Abbot/M abbot/MS Abbott/M abbr abbrev abbreviated/UA abbreviates/A abbreviate/XDSNG abbreviating/A abbreviation/M Abbye/M Abby/M ABC/M Abdel/M abdicate/NGDSX abdication/M abdomen/SM abdominal/YS abduct/DGS abduction/SM abductor/SM Abdul/M ab/DY abeam Abelard/M Abel/M Abelson/M Abe/M Aberdeen/M Abernathy/M aberrant/YS aberrational aberration/SM abet/S abetted abetting abettor/SM Abeu/M abeyance/MS abeyant Abey/M abhorred abhorrence/MS abhorrent/Y abhorrer/M abhorring abhor/S abidance/MS abide/JGSR abider/M abiding/Y Abidjan/M Abie/M Abigael/M Abigail/M Abigale/M Abilene/M ability/IMES abjection/MS abjectness/SM abject/SGPDY abjuration/SM abjuratory abjurer/M abjure/ZGSRD ablate/VGNSDX ablation/M ablative/SY ablaze abler/E ables/E ablest able/U abloom ablution/MS Ab/M ABM/S abnegate/NGSDX abnegation/M Abner/M abnormality/SM abnormal/SY ab......

Words: 113589 - Pages: 455