Free Essay

Law Sox

In: Other Topics

Submitted By Duvaleir
Words 775
Pages 4
Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Sox Act) 2002

Student’s Name

Institutional attachment

The Sarbanes Oxley [sox] Act of 2002 made a significant move in the administrative environment of publically exchanged organizations. Because of a becoming number of corporate misrepresentation outrages, for example, Enron and Tyco universal, the united state congress passed the law in a push to decrease the likelihood of future extortion. The law requires more compressive monetary reporting necessities and upholds stricter punishments on the individuals who occupied with plans to swindle financial specialists. Then again, there are numerous adversaries to the law who accept the regulations are unnecessary and excessively excessive for generally organizations. With the end goal of this paper, I will dissect an article title "The Law change corporate" by Michael peregrine, which traces the some significant impacts of the law. The creator is a corporate legal counselor and has abnormal state of experience dealing with agreeability issues with open organizations.

Generally, Michael accepts that SOX has been very fruitful. The most vital impact clarified in this article is focused on the structure of corporate legislation. He expressed that SOX seized the focused of corporate course from the corner of the workplace and returned it the meeting room, where it had a place. Besides the law empowered the recognizable proof of the best practices to guide meeting room conduct. Preceding 2002, the official officers of the organization had the capacity to wield a high level of force without the support of the governing body. The law changed this by obliging individuals to be occupied with the moral choice methodology of the organization. This change alone has made a broad change in corporate society publically exchanged organizations all through the United States.

The article likewise bring up that Sarbanes Oxley Act has made a "governing rules" framework for the corporate legislation. Official must look for the regard from the top managerial staff and tight clamp versa. The likelihood of a whole directorate and official administration group cooperating to confer misrepresentation is amazingly unlikely.sox has been in actuality in excess of 10 years and the event of the far reaching corporate outrage has been enormously decreased. The framework is not impeccable yet the law has made noteworthy advancement that is working to the greatest advantage of shareholders.

Moral choice making is of most extreme imperativeness for the publically exchanged organizations. Shareholders depend on exact money related appearing for settle on educated speculation choices. At the point when an organization occupied with a corporate misrepresentation, it makes it difficult to increase an acceptable understanding of the organization for the speculation forms. One of the greatest upgrades brought about a significant improvement partition of obligations for bookkeeping obligations. Misrepresentation is substantially more prone to happen inside in a little gathering of administrators. Differentiating obligations guarantee that it would take numerous administrators to contrive together to submit unlawful acts. All officials must consent to an arrangement to stick to the standards of SOX before taking the position. Obliging this assention makes it clear to officials that misrepresentation won't go on without serious consequences and that the high moral standard must be followed in this position. What's more the individuals who are discovered liable of damaging the law set in SOX will confront extreme criminal punishments.

Criminal punishments are planned to dissuade administrators from carrying out dishonest acts later on. The likelihood of escaping with corporate misrepresentation is low and violators of SOX can hope to serve a long jail sentence if discovered blameworthy. Previously, corporate administrators accepted that had a level of security from criminal punishments. Corporate outrages would frequently bring about the liable gatherings getting off with the simply minor punishments. The demonstrations made bigger punishments for criminal acts that incorporate retaliating against informants, controlling budgetary proclamations and affecting examinations. Particularly setting hoodlums punishments for those activities sets an acceptable definition for dishonest conduct in the corporate setting.

Taking everything into account, SOX made a to a great extent positive effect on the moral society of a substantial organization. The progression in the corporate administration has made it more troublesome for rebel officials to settle on choice that cause corporate breakdown. A full directorate makes a framework that can completely consent to the government monetary reporting law. The article "The Law Changed Corporate America" gave a few essential cases of how better corporate administration has been solid element for enhancing moral choice making. Despite the fact that the law is ten years more established, in any case it stay vital piece of budgetary regulations for the expansive organizations well into future

References

Peregrine, M. (2012). New York Times. The Law Changed Corporate America

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Sarbanes Oxley

...LaShaunda Person University of Maryland University College This paper was prepared for AMBA 630, taught by Professor Little and Professor Riley Introduction The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was signed into law to protect investors by mandating processes that improved the accuracy and trustworthiness of corporate disclosures made pursuant to the securities laws, and for other purposes. The law was also enacted in response to several major corporate and accounting scandals; two of the most infamous cases are Enron and WorldCom. This research paper will focus on the analysis of four issues and discuss how the Sarbanes-Oxley Act affected the following subjects: A. 1. Audit committees of public company board of directors responsibilities since SOX 2. Sarbanes-Oxley section 404 on internal control 3. The accuracy of public company financial statements and the cost of capital for public companies 4. The main advantages and disadvantages of Sarbanes-Oxley Act B. Can legislation guarantee the accuracy of public company financial statements? Why have previous laws failed? Why CEOs and CFOs are paying so much attention to this law? Audit Committees of Public Company Board of Directors Responsibilities since Sarbanes-Oxley Act Since its enactment, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) has significantly increased the authority and responsibilities of audit committees and the board of directors in overseeing their companies’ financial reporting processes (American Institute......

Words: 3244 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

The Scrushy Way

...Assessment of Sarbanes-Oxley Legislation Patrick W. Bass Northcentral University Assessment of Sarbanes-Oxley Legislation The problem to be investigated is how Sarbanes-Oxley legislation improved corporate governance and improved the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX), named after its primary sponsors in both the US House and Senate, was a bipartisan bill designed to restore investor confidence. The bill was sent by the legislature to the White House and signed by President George W. Bush following the accounting scandals of the early 2000s that brought down some of the largest publicly traded firms. The stated purpose of the law was to “protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures made pursuant to the securities laws, and for other purposes” (Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002). The author believes that this law creates unnecessary government intrusion in business and is an impediment to the free market and as such puts many firms, especially smaller ones, at a competitive disadvantage. Alternatives to SOX: Handling Issues Ethically Most of the activities regulated by SOX should be handled as ethical issues. It is not necessary to create additional government bureaucracy known as the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) or to give more power to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to handle what are essentially corporate governance and ethical decisions. ......

Words: 1617 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Sar Banes Oxely

...and US Representative Michael Oxley, represents the biggest change to federal securities laws in decades. Effective in 2006, all publicly-traded companies are required to submit an annual report of the effectiveness of their internal accounting controls to the SEC. It came as a result of the large corporate financial scandals involving Enron, WorldCom, Global Crossing and Arthur Andersen. Provisions of the Sarbanes Oxley Act (SOX) detail criminal and civil penalties for noncompliance, certification of internal auditing, and increased financial disclosure. It affects public U.S. companies and non-U.S. companies with a U.S. presence. SOX is all about corporate governance and financial disclosure. High-profile business failures culminating in a media fixation on Enron called into question the effectiveness of business’ self-regulatory process as well as the effectiveness of the audit to uphold public trust in capital markets. Legislation to address shortcomings in financial reporting was slowly progressing in Congress. The sudden collapse of WorldCom guaranteed swift congressional action. President Bush signed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in to Law on July 22, 2002. The most significant legislation affecting the accounting profession since 1933. Developing meaningful reforms that protect the public interest and restore confidence in the accounting profession is the primary focus of the SOX legislation. The SEC labored long and hard to communicate to the media, the public and......

Words: 1870 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

...it protect? Who benefits from SOX most? I will discuss what the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) is its key components, and its primary objective. Also, I will discuss the criticisms surrounding the SOX act. Why it is important to enforce the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Finally, I will discuss if the SOX has achieved its goals. The main purpose of Sarbanes Oxley Act is to ensure that the corporate sector works with transparency and provides full disclosure of information as and when required (Bing, 2007). This basically means that corporations must keep good records of what goes on in their business, not just for their benefit, but just in case of an audit, then they’ll have all their transactions ready to be reviewed and to keep future corporate scandals down. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act was passed by Congress on July 30, 2002. The law forced public companies to spend much more money having their books thoroughly audited, and it increased the penalties for executives who defrauded investors. Since the bill's passage and implementation, nervous investors who had yanked trillions of dollars from the market have returned (Farrell, 2007). The men behind the Sarbanes-Oxley Act consist of U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, New York Stock Exchange CEO John Thain and former AIG chief Maurice "Hank" Greenberg. Even though their voices my appear to be isolated, Charles Niemeier a member of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, says that the law has been a huge success for......

Words: 2320 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Sarbanes-Oxley

...it protect? Who benefits from SOX most? I will discuss what the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) is its key components, and its primary objective. Also, I will discuss the criticisms surrounding the SOX act. Why it is important to enforce the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Finally, I will discuss if the SOX has achieved its goals. The main purpose of Sarbanes Oxley Act is to ensure that the corporate sector works with transparency and provides full disclosure of information as and when required (Bing, 2007). This basically means that corporations must keep good records of what goes on in their business, not just for their benefit, but just in case of an audit, then they’ll have all their transactions ready to be reviewed and to keep future corporate scandals down. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act was passed by Congress on July 30, 2002. The law forced public companies to spend much more money having their books thoroughly audited, and it increased the penalties for executives who defrauded investors. Since the bill's passage and implementation, nervous investors who had yanked trillions of dollars from the market have returned (Farrell, 2007). The men behind the Sarbanes-Oxley Act consist of U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, New York Stock Exchange CEO John Thain and former AIG chief Maurice "Hank" Greenberg. Even though their voices my appear to be isolated, Charles Niemeier a member of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, says that the law has been a huge success for......

Words: 2320 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Week 2

...Act (SOX) became law in the year 2002. This act was proposed and created by a Paul S. Sarbanes, United States Senator and Michael G. Oxley, United States House of Representative. The purpose of the act was to bring transparency to gain investors’ confidence (CPA Journal, 2008, Pg. 16 p.1). The SOX Act is a complex law that includes several regulations, procedures, and penalties for fraudulent financial practices and reporting. In 2008 U.S. Senator Paul S. Sarbanes was interviewed by a journalist of CPA Journal and during the interview he state the following, “ We tried to create a framework that supports individuals who want to do things honestly, and identifies and penalizes those who cheat and cut corners” (CPA Journal, 2008 Pg.17 p. ix). During the first five years after the creation of the law, several companies showed resistance adopting the financial procedures and reporting provided by legislators in the SOX Act. After thirteen years from the enactment of the law there still criticism arising from several sections included in SOX Act. This paper will discuss the negative and positive views towards the SOX Act, the discussion will determine the efficacy of the law in avoiding future frauds. Sarbanes–Oxley Act negative views Strong criticism come from Small businesses since the financial reporting and audit requirements included in the law are extremely costly for small companies. Small businesses struggle to become publicly, but eventually since the law......

Words: 1215 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Sarbanes-Oxley Act Questions

...independent accountants. Today scrutiny of the accounting industry is more intense as laws are created to punish those that choose to falsify information. This paper aims to explain the importance of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) as it relates to the internal control, Chief Executive Officers and Chief Financial Officers. We will also identify the pros and cons of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) and changes that could be made in order to pose arguments from both sides of the act. Introduction In the early 2000’s, one of the darkest times ever experienced in the history of accounting occurred due to numerous scandals. The results of these scandals from companies lead to terrifying actions, which included the downfall of one of the largest accounting corporations, Arthur Anderson, for their help with Enron. Companies such as Enron, Tyco, and WorldCom have led to the passing of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) due to their financial reporting scandals (Forbes, 2013). With the passing of SOX in 2002, the falsification of financial statements by companies became a criminal offense. The passing of the SOX act posed as a challenge to many companies as it enforced businesses to make ethical decisions. If companies fail to comply with this law, they will be accountable for their actions. Prosecution and jail time are some of the punishments put in effect if CEOs and CFOs are found guilty of disobeying this law. A company’s financial information is considered to be the heartbeat of......

Words: 2955 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Sox Anaylzation

...Group 2 Assignment: The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) & Financial Statements Accuracy University of Maryland University College Geralda Francois Courtney Holbrook Nicole Mone Walker Moyosore Bankole AMBA630 Mark Wylie August 18, 2015 Introduction The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) was created after the Great Depression of the 1930’s, and given a mandate to oversee US financial markets. Since then its basic policy has been to promote transparency in corporate finance, through the full disclosure of companies’ financial performances. This allowed the SEC to maintain a strong track record of corporate financial disclosure oversight through the 1990’s, when a period of rapid stock market growth and crashes rocked the system (Introduction to SOX, n.d). During that period, companies such as Enron and Sunbeam Corporation abruptly filed for bankruptcy or devalued overnight. This occurred largely because they concealed the real state of their financial health on audit reports (Livingston, 2003, p.7). In response to these scandals the US Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX). Many of the provisions in SOX give additional powers to the SEC, including jurisdiction over the new Public Accounting Oversight Board and oversight over private industry Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), and Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS). Moreover, U.S. public company CEOs and CFOs must certify the accuracy of financial......

Words: 3587 - Pages: 15

Premium Essay

Sarbanes Oxley's Disparate Impact on Small Companies

...Disparate Impact of SOX on Large and Small Firms Andrew Rubin St. John’s University I. Introduction During the early 2000’s there was a series of scandals involving many large, multinational firms. Among these firms were Enron, Tyco and WorldCom, all of whom had been costing investors and stakeholders millions, if not billions, of dollars through fraud. Following the scandal, the downturn in investor confidence was enormous. Looking back, there appeared to be a culture of fraud and deceit inside corporate America that had been hurting the average investor. After uncovering these scandals Congress wanted to take immediate action. It passed the Sarbanes – Oxley Act (SOX) shortly after in an attempt restore faith in the country’s capital markets. Between 2000 and 2002 there appeared to be a new, large fraud every few months being covered in the news. Investors were drawing their money out of the markets and some of the largest corporations in America were going bankrupt. Congress quickly looked for answers as to how this could happen and discovered a myriad of factors. Many factors combined to create a culture where small changes to the financials were overlooked and over time those small changes accumulated into larger changes, and bigger issues. Eventually the once small changes became too large to ignore any longer and resulted in collapse. One major factor uncovered by Congress was the effect of auditor conflicts of interest might be......

Words: 6658 - Pages: 27

Free Essay

Sarbanes and Oxley

...Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 - SOX The finance industry was not always regulated. Prior to the great stock market crash in October of 1929, there was no regulation. After this crash, Congress held hearings to determine the problems and suggest solutions. This resulted in the Securities Act of 1933. The Security Exchange Commission (SEC) was created as a result of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The intent of this Commission was to restore confidence to investors by requiring honest reporting, and requiring companies and people who work in the industry to put investors’ interests first. After the fall of several publicly traded companies in 2001, it was clear that the SEC alone was not enough. For this reason and through the guidance of U.S. Senator Paul Sarbanes and U.S. Representative Michael Oxley, Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in July 2002 (U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 2013). The mission of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is stated in Public Law 107-204 (2002), “To protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures made pursuant to the securities laws, and for other purposes” (p. 1). To determine if the mission of SOX is successful the following will be discussed; the main advantages and disadvantages associated with SOX, the affects SOX has on public company Chief Operating Executive’s (CEO’s) and Chief Financial Executive’s (CFO’s), the impact SOX has on outside independent audit......

Words: 3725 - Pages: 15

Premium Essay

Sarbanes Oxley Act

...passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) in the year of 2002 (Rehbein, 2010, p.90). Though there are many benefits that have come out of SOX, many argue that there are several issues that should be addressed. As a team we will discuss the main advantages and disadvantages of the act, the effect the act has had on CEO’s and CFO’s of publicly held companies, how the act has affected the function of internal controls within organizations, and what changes should be made to act. What Are the Main Advantages and Disadvantages of SOX? The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) has many advantages. There are repeated ethical scandals in business and the majority of the time “ethics and the law run parallel” to each other (Livingstone, 2009, P. 4). The SOX is the first step in holding companies accountable and is a model for accounting practice reform. The SOX controls auditors’ independence and responsibility by fighting business fraud and improving corporate governance. Tsui (2009) stated that “the SOX increases personal liabilities of senior management and introduces extremely cumbersome compliance processes” (p. 22). Raghavan (2007) explains that: “In CFO Research Services’ survey of 180 finance executives in August 2005, increased management confidence in the accuracy of the financial reports due to SOX requirements on documentation, monitoring, and enforcement of controls was cited as the primary benefit of the compliance effort”. (182) The SOX assists and makes......

Words: 2868 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

...put in place in 2002. That was put in place as a direct response to the corporate scandals of Enron and other scandals that followed, and was also put in place to help restore confidence in the financial market. SOX-Applies only to US companies on the US exchange, and is an Act put in place in 2002 to mandate all publicly traded corporations to maintain adequate internal control. SOX basically make sure that all US publicly traded corporation do what is in the best interest to protect the investment of stockholders. SOX-Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is an ACT that was put in place where all publicly traded U.S. corporations are required to follow certain guidelines and requirements. Basically, these systems were put in place because of securities fraud issues that came to light in the early 2000’s, and are put in place to help minimize and eliminate fraud, to ensure accurate record keeping and reporting as well as to protect investors (Kimmel, Paul D. (2011-06-28). One key component is a Code of ethics requirement which provides a guideline for internal corporate governance. These standards outline standards for corporate Officers, Directors, employees, and even its internal auditors. Another key component and mandatory requirement of SOX is for the company to hire an outside auditor, and that there be a rotation of auditors within that firm to conduct the audits. Some professionals are stating that is should be necessary to rotate auditing firms......

Words: 2407 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Sarbanes Oxley Act

...smaller accounting firm, this change in law is why I choose to go into the private company accounting route. First let me start off by informing you want the Sarbanes – Oxley act is, it is a government act that changed the old SAS no. 59 as a result of the Enron and World Com financial collapses (Ryu 2009). The law was enacted to enhance the standards for all US based public companies financial reporting, this happened as a result of the Enron and World Com financial collapses (Elson 2008). This law was designed to help create auditor independence, so financial reports that are relied upon from prospective shareholders and lenders are accurate.(Li-ying 2011). The law, as I have said was enacted as a knee jerk reaction to the Enron collapse, it was discovered that Arthur Anderson the accounting firm for Enron was both their internal and external auditors. The two companies were so comingled it was hard to differentiate which employee worked for who, both the CEO and CFO both had previously worked for Arthur Anderson (Ryu, 2009). The law which is known as SOX changed how responsible auditors were for the opinions they gave on the financial reports they audited. The outside public depended on these reports to make financial decisions, and determine the financial health of any entity. This law changed the auditor’s liability; it now requires that auditors have a detailed knowledge of the internal controls in each audit that an opinion is given on. SOX requires management......

Words: 1320 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

A Primer on Sarbanes-Oxley

...according to Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) as related to ethics and those influenced by decisions from investment management. I assessed the financial and social business practices of different organizations and identified ethical issues within the businesses that impacted internal and external stakeholders. Research revealed issues and activities that should have been resolved voluntarily prior to SOX’s enactment to meet ethical considerations relative to social and financial performance and the organization’s reputation. Recommendations were made based on studies and scholarly articles implicating the best governance practices organizations should adopt to remain compliant with SOX. What is SOX? SOX was established in 2002 as an act to strengthen corporate governance and restore investor confidence. The most important conditional term was to protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures made pursuant to the securities laws and other purposes (Jennings, 2012, p. 212). Provisions under SOX affected organizations’ processes and changed how financial information was released to the public. The act highlights the importance of information system controls by requiring management and auditors to report on the effectiveness of internal controls over the financial reporting component of the organization’s management information systems (Li, Peters, Richardson & Weidenmier Watson, 2012, p. 179). Activities and Issues covered under SOX Many issues......

Words: 1194 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Khan

...Stacy Strickland Article Review Law/421 Blan Nicholson September 28 The SOX which is the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2202 made an outstanding shift in the environment that was regulatory of companies that was publically traded. The number grew of corporate scandals that was fraud, such as Tyco and Enron of the United States decided to pass a law to lower the future of probability fraud. The law in the United States requires a financial report that is more comprehensive and it have requirements. The law also have penalties that is stricter on the people who do schemes to throw the investors off. I will use the article name “The Law Changed Corporate America”, by Michael Peregrine, which will identify the law and its major effects. Michael Peregrine believed in the SOX. He felt like it would be very successful. The corporate governance structure was the effect that was explained in this article. This structure was very important. He states that the center of direction which was corporate, from the office in the corner and returned it where it was at in the boardroom. This article also verifies that the SOX had created a “balances and checks” system for the governance corporate. The board of directors had to approve certain actions that the executives had to approve certain actions that the executives wanted to make and the executives had to approve the certain actions the board of directors wanted to make. The executive management team and the board of directors is...

Words: 564 - Pages: 3