...Leadership vs. Management Laura Rouse-DeVore The relationship between Leadership and Management is, perhaps, one of the most impactful and significant relationships that exists in organizations currently. The intersection and overlap of management and leadership, in addition to the polarity between the two are ideas that have been studied for many years. One certainty is that management and leadership go hand-in-hand. (What is the difference between Management and Leadership?, n.d.) (Cox and Miner, 2013) What is Management? Defining management as a term is an essential step to establishing how management and leadership relate to each other. Management involves the direction of a group of employees or individual towards the achievement of certain outcomes and specified performance indicators. Management is centered around results and the structures, processes, and principles employed for that group to meet those goals and achieve the desired results. Management utilizes formal hierarchial structure and positions of authority to establish power in the group. (Leadership vs. Management, n.d.) The Composition of Leadership Although the terms, “management” and “leadership”...
Words: 934 - Pages: 4
...Leadership versus Management Every company has leaders and managers, and sometimes they are the same person. Leaders are those who can motivate and inspire others to perform at their best to get the job done. Managers are those in charge who organize and make sure that things get done, not necessarily worry about popularity or unity within the group (Brown, 2010) (DuBrin, 2010). • Those put in a position of power over others, either a manager position or a leadership position must have the qualities that will benefit the company in those roles. • Leaders are those who work hard and perform positive results and in doing so are able to bring out the best in others around them. Leading by example is a key trait of a leader and not necessarily that of a manager in charge. • A manager is the key person is in a position of authority over others and they are the one who has the ability to get a task done and stay on schedule. Popularity with subordinates may not be the primary goal of finding a manger but one who is task and detail oriented. • Leaders may not always be good managers. Leaders tend to get the job done through a different approach than managers. Leaders evoke the feelings of determination and quality work in others which is not always accomplished under time constraints. The job gets done but in no set time. • Managers set goals and expectations for the group to get done and the group is expected to perform. This is where having a good...
Words: 752 - Pages: 4
...Management VS Leadership Bianca Fontanez MGT 321 Assessing Leadership Skills Professor Jessica Cossette September 1, 2014 Management VS Leadership Differentiating between a manager and a leader is not an easy task for many people think they are one in the same. For any person would say, “Aren’t they both leaders?” However, this is not the case. There are many cases in which a manger forgets that they must also be a leader. It is possible for a person to be a manager and a leader. Leaders are integral parts of organization as well as managers. Therefore, it is interesting to find that any person can be a leader whereas managers are those appointed to a power of position. A leader can be a sales person, a CEO, or any other member of a work force. Both leaders and managers are necessary parts of an organization. There are people who are natural leaders. These individuals can be found in any position, and people will willingly follow them. There are often times where a good leader will not be a good manager. It turns out that managers and leaders are not often found within the same individual. The key difference in a leadership role is that people willingly follow them. People believe in what the message is and willingly do what is being requested of them. On the other hand, a manager may demand results whereas the productivity will not be as high being that people do not believe in their work (Brown, 2010). The manager ensures all work is done in a timely manner...
Words: 989 - Pages: 4
...LEADERSHIP VS MANAGEMENT In an organization, questions always arise about the most effective way to run a business so that it can be successful. We often think about the great idea that makes the business in top, the good structure and strategy of the organization made by managers, the fruit of a teamwork, the way directors lead and so much more. All these are true, but the point is whatever activity the organization aims for, how better the strategy and structure are, how great the idea is, without this person who influence, inspire and energize the group to reach a common goal, the organization remains managed but not enough in an effective way. In fact, the success of a business depends on how efficient the leader builds up a culture work in order to incite the group to seek commitment. That is why, leadership is important, as the surplus component of management. In general, management has the duty to plan, organize and coordinate but in term of leadership, a leader produces inspiration and motivation to influence people’s actions towards management. Leader is visionary that makes all company works towards and keep going until achievement. Therefore, not all managers are leaders but all leaders are managers. So, the battle between the best manager and the best leader cannot really take a stand because they are complementary if the organization wants to be successful in an effective way. (Ricketts, 2009) Although they are complementary, their competences and...
Words: 595 - Pages: 3
...MANAGEMENT VS. LEADERSHIP Management vs. Leadership Leadership can be defined as the ability to direct the operations, activity, or performance of others. A leader is an individual who leads, guides or inspires others. A leader is someone who will take charge of a group or be vocal amongst others. However, to be a leader, one must not only have the ability to take charge or be vocal, but also must have the respect of others in the group, team, or organization. With leadership, perception is the better part of reality: Being a good leader may be difficult if followers do not perceive the individual as one (Altar 2006). A leader must know what his or her followers think. Most important leaders will say that leadership ability is the single most important personal attribute that one needs to succeed. Leadership has many facets to its name. Some of the most important leadership skills are communication and relationship building. One trait that is not characteristic of a good leader is dominance. When a leader tries to dictate, they will lose respect from others. A commanding style of leadership in not recommended, but rather have one who can win hearts and minds. In the present, many organizations are putting their employees through different leadership development programs. "Companies with effective processes for assessing individual leadership development needs were significantly more likely to have recorded an increase in sales and net income between 2003 and 2004" (Switzerland...
Words: 1412 - Pages: 6
...“Both management and leadership are needed to make teams and organisations successful. Trying to decide which is more important is like trying to decide whether the right or left wing is more important to an airplane’s flight. I’ll take both please!” (Clemmer, 2005, as cited in McLean, 2005, p.16). The aim of this essay is to answer the age old question as to whether management or leadership is more important to an organisation. Organisations, ranging from professional to social, have been in existence for centuries and the sole purpose of any of these organisations is to grow and succeed. Thus, it is without a doubt that any organisation would accomplish much without a source of management or leadership. Even though it is evident that both management and leadership are both fundamental to a successful organisation, a distinction between the two should be made; although they are both similar in definition and function they do differ in importance in and effect on organisations. It is contended that the implementation of good management has a greater benefit, and therefore has more importance, to an organisation than leadership because: leading is considered as an element of the management function; to manage an organisation is to sustain it whereas to lead is to direct it but if there is no management, there is no entity, which leaves nothing for leaders to lead; leadership is focused on the management of people but an organisation is made up of more than just people; and also...
Words: 2476 - Pages: 10
...Management VS. Leadership Leadership is one of the key roles as to ensuring a team creates success. Students acting together in a group must have a leader of some sorts to keep the team motivated, on task, and create group cohesion. The leader of a group should act in an influential and encouraging way. The same goes for corporate employees; they must have guidelines in order to complete their work in a timely manner, which stems perhaps from a co-worker stepping up and creating those guidelines and guaranteeing the team is completing them. Students and employees take orders from the people they call professors or managers, but leaders are the people they look up to and find to be effective and inspiring. According to Tony Bush, the concept of leadership deals with three very important characteristics: influence, values, vision (Bush, 2008, p. 276). To be a leader, it is key to influence a team in a positive way and basically give them hope for bigger and better situations. Nobody wants to work for a person who does not show or teach them how to conduct themselves in a good way while working with others. Teams need someone to influence their decisions and really help define their purpose in a more reasonable way. When a person manages, that is more relying on their organizational skills and keeping people in line with the goals. Leaders are who their teams look up to and follow in their footsteps. Without a leader’s values, the team would not necessarily make ethical decisions...
Words: 1336 - Pages: 6
...Jessica Mueller Management 310 Jon Cook February 13, 2013 Management vs. Leadership What is the difference? Management and leadership. Same thing right? Wrong. There is a big difference in what it means to be a leader, or to just manage. This paper will discuss the definitions of the two, and compare and contrast. Analysis an example of a management situation that lacked leadership. And a few recommendations on how to change from a manager to a leader, and the qualities needed. As defined in Schermerhorn, “leadership is the process of inspiring others to work hard to accomplish important tasks”. (Schermerhorn, 2013) Management is defined by Wikipedia as “The process of dealing with or controlling things or people." The responsibility for and control of a company or similar organization. The two definitions are very similar at first glance, but there is one major word missing in the definition of management. Inspire. When you inspire someone, you help him or her have the urge or ability to do something. (NEED TO EMPHASIZE MORE HERE) Now lets talk about some situations where it is clear that the manager doesn’t have any leadership qualities. At 11th Street Precinct Bar and Grill, things can get a bit hectic on a busy Friday or Saturday. During this busy time, employees have a lot on their minds trying to remember what they need to do for each table. It might seem like a simple task to serve tables, but there are lots of room for error in the front and...
Words: 1007 - Pages: 5
...Watkins, M.D. (2012). How managers become leaders. Harvard Business Review, 90, 65-72. Yukl, G. (2012). Effective leadership behavior: What we know and what questions need more attention. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26, 66-85. One definition of management is: “Getting things done through other people.” Yukl, in contrast, states “the essence of leadership in organizations is influencing and facilitating efforts to accomplish shared objectives’ (p. 66). 1. Yukl presents a table on p. 68 that lists 15 leadership behaviors. a. Which of these behaviors are more commonly exhibited by both managers and leaders? (1 point) Answer: If I accept the above definition that management is “getting things done through other people”, and that Yukl considers leaders to influence and facilitate efforts to accomplish shared objectives, then I have determined that there are seven of Yukl’s behaviors that are commonly exhibited by both managers and leaders. These include: planning, clarifying, monitoring, problem solving, recognizing, empowering, and networking. Yukl’s task-oriented behaviors, described as leadership behaviors, can also be relevant for managers who “get things done through other people”. On page 69, Yukl describes that task-oriented behaviors “ensure that people, equipment, and other resources are used in an efficient way to accomplish the mission of a group or organization.” These are specific, measurable concepts that a manager can delegate to “get things...
Words: 3635 - Pages: 15
...Management and Leadership In today’s business, there is the need of having people to lead and manage due to the them growing rapidly. For that, reason organizations are hiring leaders and managers to help them run their businesses. Many would think that management and leadership are synonymous to each other but they are not. The two are related, but their functions are different. Below I will differentiate their roles and responsibilities in maintaining a healthy environment in an organization. In addition, I will give recommendations to create and maintain a healthy organizational culture. Management and leadership are both important in an organization, but they seek two different things. Managers focus on managing the work that needs to be done by putting their employees to help them accomplish the objectives while leaders focus on leading people to the companies vision. Management also focuses on the short-term events, they ensure that the resources are used and improvement is made within time frames of days, weeks and months. Leaders, in the other hand deals with uncertainly, they focused on long term events such as policies and procedures. Managers empowers (not only delegate) staff and develops them for advancement. Managers has to seek feedback and listen, they have too build visions and missions with their staff. Managers has to respond promptly to staff and manager has to manage creatively and to demonstrate good examples to the staff It is important...
Words: 394 - Pages: 2
...Project Execution Phase 4.1 Project Execution Phase Overview Once a project moves into the Execution Phase, the project team and the necessary resources to carry out the project should be in place and ready to perform project activities. The Project Plan should have been completed and baselined by this time as well. The project team and specifically the Project Manager’s focus now shifts from planning the project efforts to participating in, observing, and analyzing the work being done. Figure 4.1.1 shows where in the Project Management the Execution Phase occurs. Figure 4.1.1 Project Management Execution Phase Project Manager’s Responsibilities A Project Manager’s responsibilities do not stop once the planning of the project is done. Because a Project Manager is responsible to internal and external stakeholders, the project team, vendors, executive management, etc. the visibility of the position is intensified. Many of these Project Management Methodology 4-1 Section 4 Project Execution Phase people will now expect to see and discuss the resulting deliverables that were so meticulously detailed in the Planning Phase. As a Project Manager, keeping oneself from getting “down in the weeds,” especially on large projects, will be important during project execution. This will allow the Project Manager to focus their attention on enabling the project plans, processes and managing the expectations of customers and stakeholders. Particular attention during Project Execution...
Words: 3341 - Pages: 14
...Leadership and management are two terms which are often used interchangeably in corporate settings to describe a position of directing teams of people. However, as similar as they may sound, each of them has very different meanings. Management refers to roles which typically involve supervising employees. The scope of a manager’s responsibility may differ based on his position; a human resources manager has to ensure that his subordinates arrange and carry out recruitment to occupy vacant company positions, while a finance manager has to organize the collection of commercial trends and aid decision making of the higher-ups based on analyses. The manager is responsible for creating and executing plans based on goals set by the superiors and to measure the performance of his department at regular intervals, so as to help track company performance. To this end, he is granted authority over the subordinates based on the nature of his job. He oversees the day-to-day activities within his department, assigning tasks amongst the different employees, ensuring that work is done and deadlines are met. As a result, managers usually take a more directive and controlling approach, due to their need to produce results for the company. An effective manager will help to ensure that the company achieves consistently good performance over each year. Leadership, on the other hand, refers to an approach which brings about change to employees. While leaders often have the same operational roles...
Words: 999 - Pages: 4
...INTRODUCTION As a newly appointed Compliance Officer at Expert Consulting Group (ECG) I’ve been asked to define and share, during today’s conference, the differences between leadership versus management. Throughout my research I have learned that there are many opinions on this subject matter and that “leadership” and “management” are two words defined and understood very differently by many very different beings. There are those, who will treat both terms equivalently and will use the two words in place of each other. There are also those that will approach these two terms as extreme opposites and will argue the point that one cannot be a good manager and a great leader simultaneously. Lastly, there are those that are in between who truly believe that, although there are fundamental differences, an individual can be successful at both in their role. Overall, organizations need both, leaders and manager, to be extremely operative in order to run a successful operation. LEADERSHIP: DEFINITION There are many definitions that delineate the word leadership. Based on the Merriam Webster Dictionary “leader” is a guide or conductor, it is “b (1): a person who directs a military force or unit (2): a person who has commanding authority or influence”. Level Three Leadership textbook states that “leadership is about managing energy, first in yourself and then in those around you.” (Clawson, 2012, p.3) Ideally a great leader will influence his/her followers to become better in...
Words: 1083 - Pages: 5
...see a problem that needs to be fixed or a goal that needs to be achieved. It may be something that no one else sees or simply something that no one else wants to tackle. Whatever it is, it is the focus of the leader's attention and they attack it with a single-minded determination.” (About.com Management-What is a leader, F John Reh) Leadership also has the ability to inspire others to achieve more of the organizations goals. They instill confidence within the group to achieve the goals. Leading is also a critical part of the manager’s position so what is a manager. In simple terms leaders set the direction for the team, division or company. The leader is responsible for the company’s vision. What is a manager? “A Manager is the person responsible for planning and directing the work of a group of individuals, monitoring their work, and taking corrective action when necessary. For many people, this is their first step into a management career.” (About.com-Management Manager, F John Reh) The manager handles the day to day business. The manager ensures that everything consistently runs smoothly. The manager is responsible for insuring that things get done. The manager supports leadership, in some respects a duty of the manager is to make the leader look good. What does the typical manager’s day look like? A manager may do the following in a given day. A manager will often will spend much of their day...
Words: 293 - Pages: 2
...MBA Research Paper Example - Good Managers are Effective Leaders In 2013, leaders will have to hone their skills to ensure that their organizations competitively reach stated objectives and goals. It is imperative to note that management is a profession, different from leadership, which is a calling. However, to be an effective leader, one must tap into management expertise. Leadership and management are two distinct entities that must go complementary for the success of any organization, industry, sport, and even a social setting context. Notably, leadership and management skills are essential to direct a group towards stated objectives and goals. More specifically, any leader requires management skills to lead an organization, or any other group effectively. Therefore, one must adapt good managerial principles to be an effective leader. Change management The first critical part of the leader’s job is managing change. Over the years, change continues to accelerate critically. Effective leaders are those that successfully manage change in their organizations. These are the leaders that effectively realize changes in Managerial principles to ensure the smooth running of organizations, and also, to ensure that they achieve their set targets and objectives. Delegating Successful managers are those that ensure that duties and responsibilities are adequately delegated across the organization. This will ensure that every team player is fully challenged. Effective leaders...
Words: 405 - Pages: 2
