Premium Essay

Legal Reasoning

In: Philosophy and Psychology

Submitted By salvation21
Words 887
Pages 4
What is causing a lack of constitutional privacy? The United States of America is a country founded on the principles of seven founding fathers. These men strived to produce a constitutionally based system, a system which was based upon certain doctrines, one of which was privacy. This topic has been mentioned subtly in the Bill of Right and the Declaration of Independence, such as in the first amendment, the right to free speech, and in the fourth amendment, the right to no unreasonable searches and seizures. After all, we live in a country whose majority population believes in privacy being a god given right. Since America was founded on privacy, it seems absurd that the government has to look over our shoulders for insight information. A prime example of how the government interferes with the privacy of taxpaying citizens is through the U. S. Patriot Act. Yes, it was designed to prevent future terrorist attacks but it seems as if there are much more cons than pros; the checks and balances simply do not equal out. The U.S. PATRIOT Act is an acronym for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act. This provision was passed in 2001 very soon after the multiple terrorist acts on September 11th, 2001. Under the supervision of George W. Bush, the bill was passed through congress and was enacted on within an amazing 6 weeks! The bill can simply be summarized to allowing various government agencies the right to search telephone, e-mail, medical, financial, and other personal records of individuals that are suspected for suspicious behavior, and also for the monitoring of the whole public. It is as if the government created a pseudo-god, one that is omniscient and omnipresent. In one case, there was 16 year old Ashton Lundeby in Oxford, North...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Moral, Legal and Aesthetic Reasoning

...Stare Decisis, meaning “Don’t change settled decisions” principle gives precedents to a case of such, and doing anything different is a violation of legal reasoning by analogy and principally from reason by analogy in any other context (Cheesebro,...

Words: 340 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay


...Towards the half 2nd century , geographically based schools of thought came in being.There were only four major legal schools(Hanafi,Maliki,Shafi and Hanabali) which are one of the important feature of "Shariah".Shariah indicates the application of law which is justified by Holy Quran and the Prophet.There was mutual tolerance among the different schools and all of them repected the use of ijma.I personally believed the individual style of interpretation is valid and the method of reasoning can be seen in the same light because eventually each of the school leads to same point and every muslim has the right to choose any of the school. The oldest of the classical Sunni schools is the Maliki, which is originated in Medina.Respect for the sunnah of Medina as the place most closely associated with the mission of the Holy Prophet and the first Muslim community persisted in the legal thought of the Maliki school.While Hanafi jurists attached great importance to systematic consistency in legal thought and the refinement of legal principles. They used juristic speculation to develop rules and characteristically resolved legal questions through formalistic approaches....

Words: 333 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

How to Brief a Case

...Case briefing helps you acquire the skills of case analysis and legal reasoning. Briefing a case helps you understand it. B. Case briefing aids your memory. Briefs help you remember the cases you read (1) for class discussion, (2) for end-of-semester review for final examinations, and (3) for writing and analyzing legal problems. Do not try to memorize case briefs. Learning law is a process of problem solving through legal reasoning. Cases must be read in light of the series of cases with which they appear in your casebook or on the class syllabus. III. Briefing a case: The steps Although the exact form of your briefs may and can vary from case to case, the following parts should appear somewhere in your brief in a way that helps you understand the case and recall the needed information. 1. Read through the opinion first so you will understand the overall story and identify important facts, etc., before beginning to brief the case on paper. 2. Heading: a. b. c. d. Case name (to identify the parties) Court name Date of the decision Page number where the case appears in the textbook 3. Statement of Facts a. b. Identify legally relevant facts, that is, those facts that tend to prove or disprove an issue before the court. The relevant facts tell what happened before the parties entered the judicial system. c. 4....

Words: 919 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Unit 1 Law and Ethics

...Ethical and Legal Aspects of Healthcare | Law and Ethics | Unit 1 Individual Project | | Duty-oriented reasoning, otherwise known as deontology, deals with Immanuel Kant’s influential moral theory regarding what a person is obligated to do (Rosenstand, 2003). The reasoning behind deontology is the intention, and is based on universal principles that guide actions (Fremgen, 2009; Rosenstand, 2003). Duty-oriented reasoning concludes that the consequences of the action are not as important as the principle moral law that dictates the action; that the presence of one’s duty is the determining factor as to an action’s morality (Kant, 1785). For example, a person has a moral obligation to be honest, even if that honesty has negative outcomes. To lie, even to save one’s life, would be morally objectionable because there is a duty to be honest. Duty-oriented theory states that the basic "rightness" or "wrongness" of an act depends on "principle" rather than on the situation or the consequences. Duty-oriented theory promotes the good, but it is not the only driving force. Duty-oriented theory is all about correct principle regardless of results. When I have made decisions in the past, I see that "principle" is important to me, especially principles of personal boundaries, truth, and fairness. As applied to the scenario above, it is important to determine the moral obligation. As a paramedic, the implied duties and obligations are to aid those in need....

Words: 1319 - Pages: 6

Free Essay


...Whether or not any differences matter will depend on the scope of the legal principle that the relevant case stands for. It is important to note any factual differences from previous cases and to state whether or not you consider that the differences matter to your problem. 4) APPLY THE LAW TO THE FACTS This is the key aspect of answering a legal problem question. This important step comes after you have identified the key facts and...

Words: 707 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

American Jury System

...., fighting corruption, giving the people a voice in government, improving the efficiency of the legal system, and serving as a proxy “school” for popular education in democratic principles.1 It is said that the system of trial by jury is “...older than the Republic itself.”2 As a cultural and political institution, the jury is perceived as a bedrock of constitutional government, a veritable “bulwark of democracy.” The essence of the trial system is guaranteed and provided for by way of the 5th, 6th, 7th, and 14th amendments and is purported as being indicative and representative of the American system of political organization, that is, a system of government where power is derived from the popular consent of the governed. As these things go, the very existence of criticism leveled at the trial by jury system generally, and the supposed purposes to which this system serves particularly, is evidence that in a variety of instances the jury system fails to achieve the aims for which it is employed to realize. Take for instance the argument for democratic involvement. It is alleged that the trial by jury is both a means by which non-specialist are able to directly participate in government and, simultaneously, this participation is a way of “educating” the public in our form of participatory democracy and...

Words: 644 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

State of Confusion

...Whether the Confusion statute is constitutional or not is also a big question to challenge the legal reasoning. Especially to determine the validity of the statue, the application of what provisions of the U.S. Constitution should be utilized properly, and the possibility for Tanya to prevail on her suit is encountering with all the legal reasoning as well. The court will have jurisdiction over Tanya’s suit and the reasons This is the case involving the diversity of citizenship between the state of Confusion and the citizen of the state of Denial; therefore, the court that should have jurisdiction over the lawsuit is the federal District Court in the sate of Confusion where the statute enacted. If there is diversity of citizenship, federal court may be chosen to have jurisdiction (Cheeseman, 2010). Apparently, the federal government has never regulated the truck hitches used on the nation’s highways. As a result, the case involves federal questions arising under the U.S Constitution, treaties, and federal statue and regulation. Legal reasoning for the Confusion statue to be constitutional According to the Commerce Clause, Congress constitutionally regulates commerce among the several states to enhance a national market...

Words: 1012 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Corporate Social Responsibility

...Chapter 1: What is CSR Organizations can be classified in 3 categories: 1) For profits: Seek gain for their owners 2) Government: Exists to define rules and structures of society within which all organizations must operate 3) Non-profits: Emerge to do social good when the political will of the profit motive is insufficient to address societies needs Stakeholders: Includes all those who are related in some way to a firm “A stakeholder in an organization is any group or individual who can affect or is affected by the achievement of the organizations objectives” could range from clearly defined customers, employees, suppliers, creditors, and regulating authorities, to other more amorphous constituents such as local communities CSR is both critical and controversial; It is critical because the for-profit sector is the largest and most innovative part of any free societies economy. However CSR remains controversial; In spite of the rising importance of CSR today for corporate leaders, academics, and bureaucrats alike, many still draw on the views of the Nobel Prize- winning economist Milton Friedman, who argues against CSR because it distracted leaders from economic goals. Friedman believed that the only “social responsibility of a business is to increase its profits”- that society benefits most when businesses focus on maximizing their financial success. David Packard, a co-founder of Hewlett-Packard however, believes “a group of people get together and exist......

Words: 2331 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

Amartya Sen

...The book was a highlight on Economic reasoning and a critique of John Rawls Theory of Justice written in 1971. Sen in his Idea of justice has established the importance of objective reasoning. He states that justice is not a singular term but a pluralistic notion with many Dimensions. He criticizes John Rawls Theory of justice for its inadequacy in delivering actual justice. According to him concepts and principles of justice should change as per the changing needs of the society. In Idea of justice Sen makes an attempt to use basic tenets of the Theory of the Theory of Social choice to suggest possibilities that could be adopted in identification and minimization of injustice Key words: Economic reasoning, objective reasoning, utilitarian, egalitarian, libertarian, monolithic ideal, pluralistic notion Introduction- Amartya Sen is a much admired, award winning economist, writer and philosopher. A voice of the poor, and malnourished, tirelessly engrossed in the problems of the society’s poorest people. Born in West Bengal in 1933, Amartya Sen studied at Presidency college, Calcutta and Trinity college, Cambridge. He taught economics in Delhi then at Oxford, the LSE and Harvard. In 1998 became Master of Trinity, and in 2004 returned to Harvard....

Words: 1832 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Business Law

...Chapter 1 ------------------------------------------------- Law and Legal Reasoning ------------------------------------------------- N.B.: TYPE indicates that a question is new, modified, or unchanged, as follows. N A question new to this edition of the Test Bank. + A question modified from the previous edition of the Test Bank. = A question included in the previous edition of the Test Bank. | TRUE/FALSE QUESTIONS B1. Laws and government regulations affect almost all business activities. ANSWER: T PAGE: 2 TYPE: N BUSPROG: Analytic AICPA: BB-Legal B2. The U.S. Constitution is the basis of all law in the United States. ANSWER: T PAGE: 4 TYPE: + BUSPROG: Analytic AICPA: BB-Legal B3. The U.S. Constitution reserves to the federal government all powers not granted to the states. ANSWER: F PAGE: 4 TYPE: N BUSPROG: Analytic AICPA: BB-Critical Thinking B4. The Uniform Commercial Code has been adopted in all fifty states. ANSWER: T PAGE: 5 TYPE: + BUSPROG: Reflective AICPA: BB-Critical Thinking B5. Federal agency regulations take precedence over conflicting state agency regulations....

Words: 2244 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Case Brief

...The facts entry should be a short statement of the events that led one party to initiate legal proceedings...

Words: 1396 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Tanglewood Case 6

...Noe A Munoz Mgmt 364 Columbia College Professor Douglas 28 April 2015 Tanglewood Case 6 (Interview) 1.) Although having a resume and validating all of the potential applicants KSAO’s are an important step in the hiring and candidate selection process, I feel that the most important part of the hiring process would have to be the actual job interview. According to Bianca Audra she claims that standardized interview procedures yield in hiring a better quality of candidates than performing unstructured interviews. I think that by increasing the number of test or the number of forms that candidates have to take or fill out for the position of store managers will not suffice nor yield better results. The method that Tanglewood currently uses to hire managers is similar to the method that is used to hire store associates. I feel that a change is required when it comes to the selection plan if Tanglewood expects to hire the best employees out there. The department manager position requires that the potential employees take on a greater responsibility, and perform their work more intelligently. So in order to accomplish that, and hire employees that will perform those types of duties, Tanglewood must tailor our selection methods to match the specific KSAO’s that are required for the position. The more closely we measure the applicants KSAO’s to match to what is required for the position at hand the better results we would produce. We cannot accomplish that if we......

Words: 3293 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Eight Elements of Thought and Reasoning

...Running Head: Eight Elements of Thought and Reasoning Yehuwdah Yodhhewawhe Eight Elements of Thought and Reasoning G00099693 HU260 Strategies for Decision Making November 10, 2013 Eight Elements of Thought and Reasoning The purpose of this assignment to expound on four real distinct categories of reasoning which consist of deductive, inductive, adductive or inference, and analogical. The first category of reasoning involves deductive reasoning which consist of consist of implication and consequences, and interpretation and inference. Deductive reasoning is one of the two basic forms of valid reasoning; it commences with an assumed hypothesis or theory, which is why it has been called 'hypothetical-deduction; this assumption may be well-accepted or it may be rather precarious - nevertheless, for the argument it is not questioned. The basic idea of deductive reasoning is that if something is true of a class of things in general, this truth applies to all members of that class. One of the keys for sound deductive reasoning, then, is to be able to properly identify members of the class, because incorrect categorizations will result in unsound conclusions. Moreover, inferences are interpretations or conclusions that you come to. Inferring is what the intellect does in attempting to figure something out. Implications are claims or truths that reasonably follow from other claims or truths....

Words: 479 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Introduction to the Law

...Law, Legal Reasoning, and the Legal Profession Dispute Settlement Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility Business and the Constitution Crimes Intentional Torts Negligence and Strict Liability Licensing and Intellectual Property 1 Chapter 1 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Law, Legal Reasoning, and the Legal Profession LO Learning Objectives After you have studied this chapter, you should be able to: Identify the basic functions of law. List the various sources of law. Analyze a case using the four steps in the process of legal interpretation. Make a legal decision by applying the three-step, stare decisis process. Explain how law is able to change despite of stare decisis. Read a judicial decision and identify which school of legal jurisprudence the judge has followed. Explain when the attorney–client privilege and work product privilege arise and when they are lost. Jennifer regularly smoked marijuana and crack cocaine throughout the duration of her pregnancy. While she was in labor, she used rock cocaine. After the child was born with an addiction to cocaine, Jennifer was charged with violating a state law that provided: “It is unlawful . . . to deliver any controlled substance to a person under the age of 18 years.”...

Words: 13402 - Pages: 54

Premium Essay

Legal Opionion

...Legal Opinions 1 Compare and Contrast Legal Opinions Legal Opinions Opinions are judicial or extra-judicial; a judicial opinion is one which is given on a matter which is legally brought before the judge for his decision; an extra-judicial opinion, is one which although given in court, is not necessary to the judgment ( A dissenting opinion disagrees with the majority opinion because of the reasoning and/or the principles of law on which the decision is based. A concurring opinion agrees with the decision of the court but offers further comment ( In law, a majority opinion is a judicial opinion agreed to by more than half of the members of a court. A majority opinion sets forth the decision of the court and an explanation of the rationale behind the court's decision. Not all cases have a majority opinion. At times, the justices voting for a majority decision (e.g., to affirm or reverse the lower court's decision) may have drastically different reasons for their votes, and cannot agree on the same set of reasons. In that situation, several concurring opinions may be written, none of which is actually the view of a majority of the members of the court. Therefore, the concurring opinion joined by the greatest number of judges is referred to as the plurality opinion (

Words: 1270 - Pages: 6