Premium Essay

Lenin

In:

Submitted By ejd652
Words 258
Pages 2
Imperialism described by Lenin States that Imperialism is considered the supreme point of capitalism. That Imperialism is a development that capitalists are compelled into for the exploration of greater earnings in declining and teetering markets. Lenin’s theory is usually expressed as a coherent augmentation of Marx’s in the sense of applying it to a practical use. Marx’s theory, in comparison to Lenin’s, contemplated a working class taking on capitalism on a bigger international scale or stand up to more failure. Lenin’s inquiry exemplifies a gratification to Marx’s. In Linen’s script it says, “It is painful, in these days of liberty, to reread these passages of the pamphlet, which have been distorted, cramped, compressed in an iron vise on account of the censor. About the fact that imperialism is the eve of the socialist revolution”. It depicts different assumptions about social classes and the way they behave, the relation between state, and the possibilities of minorities acquiring power and bringing social changes with politics and violence if necessary. Linen’s literature wanted to make the reader understand modern politics through economics. In the beginning of the work it says, “I trust that this pamphlet will help the reader to understand the fundamental economic question, viz., the question of the economic essence of imperialism, for unless this is studied, it will be impossible to understand and appraise modern war and modern politics”. In order to understand Linen’s work, you would have to understand the economy of the time. This is why he covers so many economical points throughout the

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Research Paper On Vladimir Lenin

...Vladimir Lenin was best known for being the founder of the Communist Party of Russia. Lenin was born in Simbirsk, Russian on April 22, 1870. His mother and father were both well educated and his dad was a professor. During his childhood, Lenin was a very gifted and intelligent student. He became fascinated with the studies of Karl Marx and was convinced that the teachings of “Marxism” were used to model the idea of a perfect government. In the year 1917, Lenin and the Bolshevik Party overthrew the Russian government. This takeover is referred to as the Bolshevik Revolution. After taking over the government, Lenin created the Russian Socialist Federative Soviet Republic and appointed himself to be the head of this new government. Upon establishing...

Words: 442 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Lenin and the Bolshevik Revoloution Essay

...Evaluate Lenin’s contribution to the success of the Bolshevik Revolution in November 1917? Lenin played a crucial role in the success of the November Revolution. He did not create the discontent which permeated Russian society in 1917, but he did devise slogans and strategies to win disaffected groups over to the Bolshevik Party. By the beginning of 1917, the Tsarist regime was facing insurmountable problems. The peasants were demanding land; the workers wanted higher wages and better working conditions; the middle class wanted political reforms to make Russia a true constitutional democracy; and all three classes were demanding an end to the war. More than anything, it was the war which brought an end to Tsarism and set the scene for the Bolshevik Revolution. By 1917, casualties numbered in the millions, and the lack of food and fuel on the home front led to hunger and privation. The Tsar was unable to solve these problems, and was soon overthrown in a popular uprising. What emerged was a system of dual power, based on the workers’ soviets (councils) and the Provisional Government. The soviets represented the peasants, workers and soldiers. The Provisional Government represented the aristocratic and middle classes. Lenin understood that the Provisional Government would only survive if it met the popular expectations which were unleashed by the fall of Tsarism. However, the Provisional Government saw itself as a caretaker institution only, and was unwilling to...

Words: 578 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Explain Why There Was No Successor to Lenin

...Explain why there was no successor to Lenin in 1924? (12 marks) Lenin's concerns over who was to replace him were largely due to ego, he thought that noone was capable of seeing Russia's problems, or the "correct" Marxist solution as clearly as he could. Lenin's ego was the main reason why no one candidate emerged whilst he was alive. He was concerned about all the the prospective candidates, seeing such flaws in their characters that he thought none of them were suitable for the position. He outlined all of his concerns in his testament. In many ways he was right, Bolshevism was, in reality, Lenin's project, anyone who disagreed with him was either thrown out of the party, branded a Menshevik, or worse. ! Lenin's stroke in 1922, the senior Bolsheviks could not agree on an individual who had After the intellectual and moral authority to replace Lenin, so they compromised, and picked three leaders - Stalin, Kamenev and Zinoviev to rule until he either got better or died. This was made official once Lenin died. ! arguments with fMarxists went back to his early days in exile, when he disagreed with His the founders of the Russia Social Democratic Labour Party Georgi Plekhanov and Pavel Aksel'rod, this disagreement led him to form his own faction of people who followed his ideas - the Bolsheviks. ! and policy were divided among party members at all levels.The issue was the Ideology survival of the Revolution and thus,by extension,the party itself.Trotsky...

Words: 716 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Castro and Lenin: an Exploration of Revolutionary Leaders

...On July 14, 1789, a precedent was set for a new brand of political struggle as Parisians stormed the Bastille, sparking the French Revolution and beginning a new era in popular government. This Revolution, in addition to reshaping Europe in the nineteenth century, would be the inspiration for many revolutions to follow, including the Russian Revolution. Furthermore, it established a collection of values which many revolutions would aim to uphold: liberty, equality, and fraternity. Chicago Historian Sheila Fitzpatrick, however, argues that these are aims that “almost all victorious revolutionaries inevitably dishonour.”1 By examining the Cuban and Russian Revolutions, this can be seen to be too general a statement. Under Lenin, the Russian Revolution instituted one of the most progressive constitutions yet seen,2 while Cuba, with its unique role in relations between two Cold War superpowers, stayed mostly true to its primary goals of attaining social justice and equality. The objective that tends to be the most fraught by revolutions is liberty, because in order to completely reshape a society, power must be, at least for a time, concentrated in the hands of few. Thus, the Russian Revolution, particularly under Stalin, can be said to have dishonoured the goals of the original revolution, while the Cuban Revolution under Castro, for the most part, did not. The aim of eliminating inequality was central to both the Russian and Cuban Revolutions. Since before its independence...

Words: 2173 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

How Does Lenin Think That Traditional Democracy Is Flawed?

...Angeliene Pax Professor Daniel Johnson History 165 16 November 2014 Analytical Exercise: Communism Why does Lenin think that traditional democracy is flawed? How does he suggest that Communism offers an alternative solution? What does he see as the ultimate stage in the development of Communism? Lenin was born into the middle class and was obsessed with Marxist doctrines. He formed the Bolsheviks, the majority faction of the Communist Party. The Bolsheviks established war communism, they seized grain from peasants, introduced rations, nationalized all banks and industry, and required everyone to work. Lenin believed that traditional democracy was flawed because to him traditional democracy was a state that had the minority ruling over the majority and that minority was limited to the people who exploit capitalism, only for the rich. He then suggested Communism as an alternative solution because it eliminated capitalism; there were no more social divisions, and there were no more restrictions. Lenin argued when the working class finally overthrows the ruling class and establishes a...

Words: 889 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Do You Agree That Trotsky Was the Strongest Candidate to Run the Communist Party After the Death of Lenin?

...Do you agree that Trotsky was the strongest candidate to run the communist party after the death of Lenin? When Lenin died, there was 5 main contenders to take over the reins. These five contenders were Trotsky, Stalin, Bukharin, Kamenev and Zinoviev. In this essay, I will be seeing if Trotsky was the strongest candidate to run the party, and If any of the other four candidates were better for the party. Trotsky was the strongest candidate for a number of reasons. One reason why he was the strongest candidate was that he rivalled Lenin in intellect and charisma. This means that he was similar or even smarter than Lenin, meaning he could easily take over the power as he had the same capabilities as Lenin. Another benefit about Trotsky was that he was a great orator, also he was very popular with youth and committed communists meaning he was already allies with the party, and he could easily take it over it. Also with Trotsky he controlled and restructured the red army to lead them to victory. Comparing Trotsky with Zinoviev, there are a quite a few differences between the two to see which one was the strongest candidate to run the communist party. Zinoviev compared to Trotsky was seen to be a coward. Zinoviev remained in his hotel far away from the fighting when the revolution was happening. This shows that Zinoviev did not have the mental capability to go out and fight and lead the men which are fighting for you. Whereas Trotsky was a warrior who wasn't afraid to go out...

Words: 822 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Asses the Reasons Why Lenin and the Bolsheviks Were Able to Seize Power in October 1917

...The Bolshevik seize of power in October 1917 was undoubtedly a turning point for Russia’s political situation and a point that would set the tone for the future rulings. It can be easily argued that the Bolsheviks were only able to take over as a result of the long term weaknesses and failures of the Provisional Government. However, as with all events in history, the final seizure in October would not have been possible had it not been for the more recent, trigger causes. The roles of Lenin and Trotsky, during the later months of 1917, were key factors in allowing the takeover to happen; and the extremely poor decisions and military leadership executed by Kerensky strengthened the Bolsheviks position for revolution. Whilst these short term causes played a major role in October, it cannot be argued that without the weaknesses of the Provisional Government, the Bolsheviks would not have been sitting in power by the end of 1917. The weakness of the Provisional Government was one the most important factors in the Bolshevik takeover in October 1917. After the abdication of Tsar Nicholas II in March 1917, the Provisional Government, formed from some of the previous Dumas, was set up to govern Russia. The new government was weak and unstable from the start, mainly due to whom it was made up of. It was a coalition, if you could call it that, between the Liberals, the Mensheviks and the Social Revolutionaries; and thus the new government had no unity from the start. With each part...

Words: 2132 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

How Accurate Is It to Say That Lenins Leadership Was the Most Important Reason for the Bolsheviks' Success in the October R

...revolution of October 1917? (20 Mark) It is accurate to say that Lenin’s leadership was one of the most important reasons for the Bolsheviks’ success in the revolution of October 1917, due to Lenin taking control over the Bolsheviks and beginning to make preparations for seizing power. The whole idea of the revolution only came about because of Lenin returning to the Bolsheviks. However, it cannot be ignored that there were other factors that contributed to the success of the October revolution such as the failings of the Bolsheviks political opponents. Lenin contributed to the Bolsheviks’ success in October 1917 mainly in three different ways. The first contribution Lenin had made in the success of the October Revolution was on the return from exile in April 1917 where he persuaded and took control over the Bolshevik party and made them adopt the idea of seizing power. This was a difficult task as many of the members of the Bolshevik party shared the Menshevik view which predicted that the overthrow of capitalism was far off. Lenin had to work hard to persuade the Bolshevik party to understand his interpretation. Lenin’s success was largely based on his force of personality, but it also owed something to the support he received from new entrants in the Bolshevik party. Secondly, Lenin raised the Bolsheviks’ political profile as he recognised that the Bolsheviks were too weak to mount a serious challenge for power. The Bolsheviks had around 25,000 members in February 1917, however...

Words: 988 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

How Far Do You Agree That the Main Reason for the Fall of the Provisional Government Was the Skill and Determination of Lenin in 1917?

...To an extent it is valid to say that Lenin's skill and determination as leader of the Bolsheviks was the main reason for the overthrow of the Provisional government. Although, there are significant other factors that contributed to the downfall of the government, such as the weakness the government it in itself possessed, the misjudgment and mistakes it made, and other contributing factors, such as the influential role of Trotsky, which helped impact on the eventual overthrow of the government. Evidence suggests that one of the main reasons for the fall of the Provisional government, was the weaknesses it in itself possessed. For example, the dual authority government can be seen as a weakness because it was not an elected body, and came into being as a rebellious committee of the old duma, refusing to disband at the Tsar's order. This meant it consequently lacked legitimate authority as a result. It had no constitutional claim upon the loyalty of Russian people and no natural fund of good will to rely on, meaning it was judged entirely on how it dealt with the nations problems, making it vulnerable from the start. Its second major weakness was that its authority was limited by its unofficial partnership with the Petrograd Soviet. To begin with there was considerable co-operation between the two, with some people (e.g.- Kerensky) being members of both bodies. The soviet did not set out to be an alternative government, and regarded its role as supervisory, checking that the...

Words: 2202 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

“the Bolshevik State Under Lenin Between 1918 and 1924 Was a Ruthless Dictatorship, Caring Little the Russian People.” to What Extent Do You Agree with This Statement?

...“The Bolshevik state under Lenin between 1918 and 1924 was a ruthless dictatorship, caring little the Russian people.” To what extent do you agree with this statement? After having overthrown the weak Provisional Government in the October Revolution of 1917, the Bolsheviks had seized power in Russia. Although they were a quite small party, that at first only had power in Petrograd, they managed to gain support and power throughout the whole country, turning it into a Bolshevik dictatorship. (Oxford 113) This was only possible because of their driven leader, Lenin, their equally motivated military leader Trotsky and the promises they made to the soviet people. Some of these are: the most famous phrase: “Peace, Bread, Land”, which captured the needs of the people in three simple words, the promise of “Soviet Power” above all and the abolition of private property and redistribution of said property. (Oxford 115) Even though this seemed very promising and beneficial for the Russian people, the methods of the Bolsheviks were less than ethical and, even though promising that it was all for the people, very controversial. The first thing to be determined, is whether Russia under the Bolsheviks was a dictatorship, and if so, a dictatorship of a single person, in this case Lenin, or the dictatorship of the whole party, Lenin’s role not being as important as historians have played it out to be. (Oxford 136) The Bolsheviks have not concealed the idea of making the country a dictatorship...

Words: 1047 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Goodbye Lenin

...“Goodbye Lenin” The movie that was planned on being shown, “The Miracle of Bern”, was replaced with “Goodbye Lenin” because the DVD was region locked for Europe and could not be played on an American DVD player. “Goodbye Lenin” was a story of a boy named Alex who saw his mother fall into a coma, and when she wakes, he tries to keep her from knowing all that has happened in the eight long months since she was last conscious. “Goodbye Lenin” starts out in 1989 in East Germany. The Kerner family is made up of Alex (main character), his mother Christina, and his sister Ariana. Alex’s mother is a huge believer in the DDR and when she sees Alex fighting against German police control, she faints in the street as he is taken away. He finds her in a hospital in a coma. Skip forward eight months and the Berlin wall has been taken down and the DDR no longer exists. Christina wakes up from her coma, but Alex is warned by the doctor that any sort of shock could scare her enough to kill her. So for the rest of the movie, Alex does everything he can to keep his proud, DDR supporting mother from knowing what has happened the past eight months and what the current state of West and East Germany is. It’s a bit difficult to write about what I learned from the film, solely because I just got back from a trip to Berlin a few weeks ago and I learned a lot about the history of West and East Germany. This film was more of an entertainment film, rather than an educational one. I suppose...

Words: 444 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Three Songs of the Lenin

...Three Songs of the Lenin Three Songs of Lenin is a documentary film made in 1934. The director of the film is Dziga Vertov. The film incorporates real images of Lenin and shows his real life in 1934. The songs sung for Lenin in this film include topics such as a woman who has just freed herself from the veil, which was like a prison to her, a village which has just gotten electricity, water which has made the desert green, people who have freed themselves from ignorance and have learnt how to read and other things which include traces of Lenin’s legacy. These songs are basically about the October Revolution, revolution in general and Lenin’s ideas which live on. The documentary is made up of three songs, which make up its three parts. It is a documentary completely dedicated to Lenin. Every shot of the film has a trace of Lenin. The film includes scenes where Lenin is talking to the masses, where Lenin, holding the red flag in his hand, has the masses following him, and that of a man like everyone else, looking around him with his smiling eyes. In the first song, that is the first section of the film, we also see traces of the Turkish people living in that region. A woman and her soldier fiancé are speaking a dialect of Azeri and Turkish. The dialogue is as follows: The soldier: “Is the rifle in place?, the woman: “It is in place”. “möhkem tie it”, “I tied it”, “take aim”, “I took aim”. One of the biggest freedoms the revolution brought was to free the woman from the veil,...

Words: 470 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Peter the Great to Lenin

...Sobranie, Vol. 4, No. 2321, p. 627 and No. 2330, p. 643. Peter the Great Reforms Russia: DECREES ON CONPULSORY EDUCATION OF THE RUSSIAN NOBILITY, JANUARY 12, AND FEBRUARY 28, 1714, ed., Peter Stearns, et al., Documents in World History, Volume II. The Modern Centuries: from 1500 to the Present (New York: Harper and Row, 1988), 33-34. Compulsory Education from Polnoe Sobranie, Vol. 5, No. 2762, p. 78 and No. 2778, p. 86. Lenin and the Russian Revolution: OUR PROGRAMME (1899), ed., Peter Stearns, et al., Documents in World History, Volume II. The Modern Centuries: from 1500 to the Present (New York: Harper and Row, 1988), 123. V.I. Lenin, Selected Works (New York: International Publishers, 1971), p.33. Lenin and the Russian Revolution: PROCLAIMING THE NEW SOVIET GOVERNMENT (NOVEMBER 1917), ed., Peter Stearns, et al., Documents in World History, Volume II. The Modern Centuries: from 1500 to the Present (New York: Harper and Row, 1988) 123-124. Robert C. Tucker, ed., The Lenin Anthology (New York: W.W. Norton, 1975), pp. 76-77, 492-95, 743. Lenin and the Russian Revolution: MODERNIZING RUSSIA (1920), ed., Peter Stearns, et al., Documents in World History, Volume II. The Modern Centuries: from 1500 to the Present (New York:...

Words: 1486 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Lenin Animal Farm

...In the book Animal Farm there are multiple animals that represent historical figures (Orwell). The animal named Old Major who is a pig represents Vladimir Lenin from the Russian Revolution. there are many examples of how these two are related in the book. The first being on a similar speech they each gave. Old Majors speech explained that humans are evil while animals are not (Orwell 5-6). Lenin's speech discussed how people should all work together as a group to succeed. He also mentioned that it shouldn’t be only one person contributing work, everyone should work together for success (Lenin). This tells me that both Old Major and Lenin believe that it wasn’t fair for one person to do all the work while the others received the benefits....

Words: 382 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Bolshevik Consolidation of Power

...Bolshevik’s would only last a matter of weeks, before worsening economic and social issues would leave their power insecure and prove too difficult for them to correct. Also the opposition was gathering momentum which Lenin knew had to be stopped in its tracks before any attacks were made on his newly formed government, consolidating power was key for the Bolsheviks and the first few months were paramount to their success. Right from the start Lenin realised that opposition was plentiful to one-party rule and his emerging Bolshevik dictatorship. Still throughout the cities many working class citizens still supported the idea of Soviet power, not Bolshevik power. The majority expected the Socialist to remerge from the dismantled Provisional Government and reinstate their power over Russia, but Lenin had always proposed to rule alone and made it clear that his party were going to merciless to any opposition that came between him and total supremacy. At the top of Lenin’s list of objectives was forming his new government, named the Council of People’s Commissars, also known as the Sovnarkom. This came as a surprise to many as it was expected that the Soviet could and would have become the main body of government in Russia as many Soviets were in fact Bolsheviks. The reason that Lenin decided to not include the Soviet’s in his plans was that he believed to gain real strength and a robust grip around Russia, he had to have total control, any other political influence may lead to that grip being...

Words: 2013 - Pages: 9