# Lenovo Wacc

Submitted By Rubin22
Words 1009
Pages 5
Lenovo Group Limited
Background:
Lenovo Group Limited is a technology company that is principally engaged in the sales of personal computers, tablets, smartphones and other cutting-edge technology. It is the global leader in personal computer sales.i While it operates in over 160 countries, 38% of its sales (over
68% of adjusted pre-tax income) come from China.ii Lenovo trades on the US OTC market
(LNGVY) at \$31.10 a share and trades on the Hong Kong stock exchange (0992:HK) at
HKD11.94 a share. Its total market capitalization as of 9/19/2014 is about \$16.2B with around
520.4M shares outstanding. Lenovo operates in over 160 countries and has a global headcount of
54,000. Lenovo breaks its performance into four geographic regions in its annual report: China,
Asia Pacific (AP), Americas (AG), and Europe-Middle East-Africa (EMEA). In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2014, China accounted for 38% of total revenue, AP accounted for 16% of total revenue, AG accounted for 21% of total revenue, and EMEA accounted for 25% of total revenue.
Additionally, revenue is broken up as follows: 51% is in notebook sales, 28% is in desktop sales,
15% is in mobile internet devices, and the rest is in other areas.iii
Cost of Equity:
Re=Rf + CRP + β (MRP) = 2.59% + .90% + .76 (3.07%) = 5.82%
To calculate Lenovo’s cost of equity, I used a method of CAPM in which I added a country risk premium to the standard CAPM equation.
Rf =2.59%
In order to maintain consistency between cash flows and the risk free rate, I chose to use the current yield on a 10-year treasury bond to estimate the risk free rate because Lenovo reports its results in US dollars. The current yield on a 10-year treasury bond is 2.59%. iv β u = β L / (1 + (1 – t) (D/E)) = .81 / (1 + (1 – .25) (.0883)) = .76
I compared the monthly returns of Lenovo over the past five years to the average monthly returns of a group of five large...

### Similar Documents

#### Dell Lbo

... 25.05 net debt/EBITDA 3.7 x A valuation for Dell was done based on projected cash flow for the next 5 years. These projected cash flows assume growth rate for Dell to be 7% and WACC to be 8.5%. The valuation is based on best case scenarios as WACC of 8.5% is very low for Dell which is rated junk by S&P. Also, we have considered really high growth rate of 7% during restructuring for a company which has seen declining revenue over the last few years. As can be seen from the DCF table in the Appendix section shows that the share price of Dell is valued at \$11.82/share. Our offer of \$13.75/share provides a premium of 16% over the valuation price for Dell. Focus on Enterprise Software Services (ESS) and going Private: The main function of taking a company public is to give early investors and employees a way to turn their shares into money. As long as a company is growing rapidly and its share price keeps rising, the stock market keeps performing this function admirably. The problem arises when the firm enters a period of market stagnation. Dell’s basic business problem is obvious. The PC market is shrinking in the face of the rising popularity of tablets and smartphones, and incumbent PC makers are seeing their profit margins challenged by new entrants such as Asus and Lenovo. Dell’s hope is to imitate IBM’s successful transformation into a...

Words: 778 - Pages: 4

#### Note

... Introduction On May 1, 2005, the Lenovo Group acquired IBM’s personal computing division (IBM PC) for \$1.25 billion, achieving the goal of its ambitious founder, Liu Chuanzhi, to create a global PC manufacturing powerhouse. By transforming itself from an upstart company focused on its domestic market, Lenovo joined an exclusive club of Chinese companies, such as Huawei and TCL, which compete head-to-head with leading multinational corporations. Without the involvement of western private equity firms – Texas Pacific Group (TPG), Newbridge Capital,1 and General Atlantic Partners (GA) – this transaction may never have been consummated. Each firm brought crucial expertise and credibility that helped mitigate the significant financial, operational and cultural risks inherent in a large scale, cross-border transaction. Many believe that these efforts opened a new chapter in the growth of China’s economy and its integration with the West. As Bill Grabe, GA’s representative on Lenovo’s board, stated: “Lenovo’s acquisition of IBM mark the start of something bigger. In the future, we will see more Chinese global giants emerging through cross-border M&A.”2 This paper examines the underlying motivations and assumptions of each party in the transaction. While this transaction had many risks, we conclude that the strategic rationale was sound, the ultimate valuation was fair, and that all players are positioned to benefit: IBM shed a resource consuming, non-core asset; Lenovo leapfrogged......

Words: 9627 - Pages: 39

Free Essay

Words: 2087 - Pages: 9

#### Heyloo

...INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF INFORMATICS AND MANAGMENT For partial fulfillment of MBA programme 2011-2013 [pic] CONTEMPORARY REPORT ON “ STRATEGY ANALYSIS OF APPLE CORPORATION AND ITS PRODUCTS” [pic] |Submitted to: |Submitted by: | |Mr.Sandeep Vyas | Neha Singh | |Mr.Rahul Sharma |MBA/11/2065 | | | | CERTIFICATE This is to certify that the project work of market research and analysis in the report entitled “Strategy analysis of apple corporation and its product” is a bonafide work carried out by Ms. Neha singh under my supervision and guidance. The project is submitted for the partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of Masters of Business Administration. The project is the original work carried out by the Student herself. Date:26/04/2012 Faculty Mentor: Mr.Sandeep Vyas Mr.Rahul Sharma PREFACE This project has been undertaken to understand the strategy of......

Words: 13532 - Pages: 55

#### Netflix - a Company Analysis

...￼￼￼2010 ￼￼￼￼￼Santa Clara University MGMT 162- Capstone Professor Schneider Winter Quarter:2010 ￼NETFLIX: A COMPANY ANALYSIS Prepared By Group 5: Alex Krengel, Annie Dudek, Rick Momboisse, Trish Paik, & Tyler Martin ￼ ￼￼Table of Contents I. Wall Street Journal Article and Executive Summary ..4 I A. Wall Street Journal Article 4 I B. Executive Summary ..5 II. External Analysis ..7 II A. Industry Definition ..7 II B. Six Industry Force Analysis ..8 II C. Macro Environmental Forces Analysis, Economic Trends, and Ethical Concerns ..15 II D. Competitor Analysis ..17 II D. 1 Netflix’s Competitors ..17 II D. 2 Netflix’s Primary Competitors ..17 II D. 3 Primary Competitors’ Business Level and Corporate Level Strategy ..18 II D. 4 How Competitors Achieve Their Strategic Position ..18 II D. 5 Willingness to Pay ..21 II D. 6 Comparative Financial Analysis ..22 II D. 7 Implications of Competitor Analysis ..23 II E. Intra-Industry Analysis ..24 III. Internal Analysis ..24 III A. Business Definition/Mission ..24 III B. Management Style ..24 III C. Organizational Structure, Controls and Values ..25 III C. 1 Organizational Structure ..25 III C. 2 Organizational Controls ..25 III C. 3 Organizational Values ..25 III D. Strategic Position Definition ..26 III D. 1 Corporate Level ..26 III D. 2 Business Level ..27 III D. 3 Resource & Capability Level ..28 Value Minus Cost Profile ..28 Value Chain ..28 VRIO Analysis ..28 Consumer Retention Analysis ..29 4Ps Analysis ...

Words: 27607 - Pages: 111

#### Financial Statement Analysis

...solution SOLUTIONS TO EXERCISES AND CASES For FINANCIAL STATEMENT ANALYSIS AND SECURITY VALUATION Stephen H. Penman Fifth Edition CHAPTER ONE Introduction to Investing and Valuation Concept Questions C1.1. Fundamental risk arises from the inherent risk in the business – from sales revenue falling or expenses rising unexpectedly, for example. Price risk is the risk of prices deviating from fundamental value. Prices are subject to fundamental risk, but can move away from fundamental value, irrespective of outcomes in the fundamentals. When an investor buys a stock, she takes on fundamental risk – the stock price could drop because the firm’s operations don’t meet expectations – but she also runs the (price) risk of buying a stock that is overpriced or selling a stock that is underpriced. Chapter 19 elaborates and Figure 19.5 (in Chapter 19) gives a display. C1.2. A beta technology measures the risk of an investment and the required return that the risk requires. The capital asset pricing model (CAPM) is a beta technology; is measures risk (beta) and the required return for the beta. An alpha technology involves techniques that identify mispriced stocks than can earn a return in excess of the required return (an alpha return). See Box 1.1. The appendix to Chapter 3 elaborates on beta technologies. C1.3. This statement is based on a statistical average from the historical data: The return on......

Words: 103287 - Pages: 414