Free Essay

Limits on Freedom

In: Historical Events

Submitted By lwjohnson1985
Words 1833
Pages 8
American History up to 1875

Name

Course

Instructor

Date

American History up to 1875

The American history records tremendous changes that define the journey taken in shaping what the country looks like today. The Indian-European conflict was common in the 17th Century in the North America. The issue of slavery got intense and many Indians fell in the hands of the European. Slaves were mistreated, overworked, and tortured to an extent of them dying at the farms. The introduction of Christianity by the Europeans meant that the Indians had to do away with their old fashioned ways of worship. The Indians and the European immigrants had different religion and beliefs that had to be unified for a common existence. The interaction between people of different races, religions and beliefs has been a great aspect of the American history. It was until later in the 20th century that European exploration and colonization of America that brought change in how the Old and New Worlds interacted.

The settlement of the Indians in America was a vital mark in the development of native culture. The Indians established their lifestyle blended with rich culture and religion. The Indians on the East Coast had a more civilized life and well-established trade systems. The first encounter between the Europeans and the native Indians took place in the 1500s.[1] The Europeans discovered America as they engaged in fishing of whales and other sea exploration activities. The first encounters between the Indians and he Europeans involved trade activities and this gave the whites a chance to learn about the new world. The Europeans also hired the Indians to work for them on their farms. In his speeches, Pontiac points out that a move by the Indians to rebel against the invasion of the Europeans was faced with a brutal challenge and killings of the slaves.[2] The Europeans believed that their actions in North America were justified as they acted on good will to improve the lives of the locals and make them have a decent religion. The Europeans first believed that the locals or the Indians had a crooked way of life that needed huge changes. The colonization of America was also facilitated by the need to introduce religion to the pagans. The Europeans, therefore, moved to North America in a bid to expand their empire and spread their religion, Christianity to the Indians who were perceived as pagans.[3]

To solve the issues that were already cropping up between the Indians and the Europeans, treaties and legal arrangements had to be put in place. The Laramie Treaty of 1851 was a credible point of peace that was meant to address the issues at hand. The formulation and designing of the treaty saw a large number of Native Americans camps and talk with the American representatives.[4] The treaty called for the government to respect the Indian people and allow them, to carry on with their livelihood and cultural activities. The local tribes had to be unified and allowed to conduct their way of life including religion.[5] In exchange, the natives had to allow the governed carry on with national projects like building roads and forts. The conflict between the Indians and the whites was thus reduced allowing for a more harmonized living and interaction.

The Europeans moved in great numbers to North America in the 1700s and grabbed land owned by the Indians. The issue brought hostility and the Indians continued suffering in the hands of their masters. Indians were deprived of their freedom of cultural value and religion by the European settlers. The issue brought a lot of suffering as the Indians had to offer forced labor to the whites that was accompanied by other mistreatments.[6] This laid the foundation of colonization that became extensive with the increase of European immigrants. The Indians lost their land to the whites and were later to work for the settlers as slaves.

Slavery was intense particularly in the 1800s where the native Indians were forced to work in the Europeans farms. Slaves were also denied the freedom of movement and this gave the Europeans more power to control them. The Indians protested and agitated or their rights through the formation of movements to help raise their concerns to the whites. Such movements were crushed and their leaders murdered to frighten the slaves.[7] The slaves were expected to offer free labor at no cost while the Europeans took control of most vital sectors of income earning. The slaves could only be fed as a reward for their labor while the Europeans received the pay earned from the sale of the harvest. The Europeans made it hard or the Indians to move from place to place as they treated them as slaves. Such mistreatments intensified the hostility between the Indians and the Europeans thus creating an extreme atmosphere and a cruel living for the Indians. Other native Indians and other American people started selling war captives to the white men as slaves. The Europeans were ruthless as they overworked the Indians thus intensifying hostility between the two groups. The Indians had various issues that affected their freedom particularly when they were captured as slaves. The slaves were expected to adapt to the white man’s way of life influencing religion.[8]

In the early 1800s, the Europeans intensified the call for the Indians to learn English to enable them to communicate fully with their white masters. It was also a way of inducing full control over the Indians through language and abolition of native ways of worship.[9] The freedom of worship was also interrupted by the Indians as the Europeans considered them as pagans. The Europeans saw a need to change the way of worship for the native Indians and this led to the introduction of Christianity. The Indians were mainly doing their worship in shrines and this was considered very informal by the Europeans.[10] The Indians had little power over the issue thus taking on Christianity as they alternative religion. To learn Christianity, one had to do away with the language barrier that existed between the whites and the Indians. Consequently, the Indians were forced to learn English to enable them to learn and communicate properly with the Europeans.

Various laws were induced that made the situation worse for the Indians as they had little or no representation in the government. For example the passing of the Fugitive Slave Act in 1973 was a huge setback to the fight against slavery as the Indians continued to work under pressure and orders from the Europeans.[11] The Indian were defined as aliens in their land and this meant antagonism in the fight for their freedom that was much curtailed by the Europeans. The Constitution acknowledged the whites as the legal settlers and owners of the land while the India were regarded as aliens and this striped them off their autonomy. Native Americans, particularly the Indians were entirely outside the constitution system that seemed to favor the whites neglecting the needs of the other races.[12] The whites’ issues were greatly addressed in the constitution while the Indian remained curtailed by the constitution. It denied them the right to express their wishes and this meant an extension of the indirect form of slavery practiced by the Europeans. The American constitution also hampered the fight for freedom and appeared to pressure the Indians. The federal treaties signed between 1700 and 1850 were the sole legal platforms through which the issues of the Indians were addressed. The federal treaties and statutes denied the Indians any legal claim over the property and land lost to the Europeans thus making them permanent dependents on the whites[13]. The constitution was much for the Whites or the Europeans who were also in control of the government.

In conclusion, the entry of the Europeans meant that the Indians had to pave the way for the whites who came in large numbers particularly in the 1700s. Forced labor was a critical aspect of the European domination over the Indians as they subjected the locals to hardships and suppressed their rights. Indians had a little taste of freedom as the whites overtook vital areas of development like land and forced the Indians to offer free labor. The whites also affected the ways of life and religion for the Indians through the introduction of Christianity. The American constitution also appeared to favor the Europeans as it rarely addressed the issues of the Native Americans. The Indians lost their autonomy as the constitution mainly acknowledged the Europeans as the legal dwellers and owners of the land. The issue of slavery sparked division between the Europeans and the Indians for decades.

References

Henry, Alexander. Travels and Adventures in Canada and the Indian Territories between the Years 1760 And1766, (1809), from Voices of Freedom (Toronto, 1901), p, 44.

Walker, David. To The Colored Citizens of the World. David Walker’s Appeal. (1829)... from Voices of Freedom. (3rd, ed.: Boston, 1830), pp. 3-5, 9, 22-24.

Parkman, Francis. The Conspiracy of Pontiac and the Indian Wars after the Conquest of Canada from Voices of Freedom. (6th ed., Boston, 1874). Vol 1, pp. 204-07.

Hector, John. “What Then Is The American?” Letters from an American farmer from Voices of Freedom. (London, 1782), pp. 48-56.

Magdalena, Naum. "Re-emerging frontiers: Postcolonial theory and historical archeology of the borderlands." Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 17.2 (2010): 101-131.

Jacquelyn, Rahman. "The N Word Its History and Use in the African American Community." Journal of English Linguistics 40.2 (2012): 137-171.

-----------------------
[1] Naum, Magdalena. "Re-emerging frontiers: Postcolonial theory and historical archeology of the borderlands." Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 17 no. 2 (2010): 121.
[2] Magdalena. "Re-emerging frontiers: Postcolonial theory and historical archeology of the borderlands." 116
[3] Ibid. 118
[4] Rahman, Jacquelyn. "The N Word Its History and Use in the African American Community." Journal of English Linguistics 40 no. 2 (2012): 147
[5] Jacquelyn. "The N Word Its History and Use in the African American Community." 151
[6] John Hector. “What Then Is The American?” Letters from an American farmer from Voices of Freedom. (London, 1782), 55
[7] Francis Parkman. The Conspiracy of Pontiac and the Indian Wars after the Conquest of Canada from Voices of Freedom. (6th ed., Boston, 1874). Vol 1: 206
[8] Jacquelyn. "The N Word Its History and Use in the African American Community." 150
[9] Ibid. 151
[10] David Walker. To The Colored Citizens of the World. David Walker’s Appeal. (1829)... from Voices of Freedom. (3rd, ed.: Boston, 1830), 23

[11] Jacquelyn. "The N Word Its History and Use in the African American Community." 163
[12] Alexander Henry. Travels and Adventures in Canada and the Indian Territories between the Years 1760 And1766, (1809), from Voices of Freedom (Toronto, 1901), p, 44.
[13] Henry. Travels and Adventures in Canada and the Indian Territories between the Years 1760 And1766, (1809),

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Religion Short Essay Selection

...that happiness is the aim of the good life, and that the happy person is living the good life, but that is not the only requirement for the good life. One other thing that is needed for the good life is a purpose. The center of Aristotle’s teaching is his belief that people, as everything else in nature has a distinctive end to achieve and a purpose/faction to fulfill. With these two requirements we are working toward earning the good life 3. Freedom itself does not impose any limits and boundaries the limits and boundaries are set by the society we live in and also by each individual. The three limits to freedom are: social, moral and limits to nature. Social limits are limits that are imposed by society and authority., (ex. Dress code, curfew). Moral limits are based on are actions. Acts are moral or ethical because they come from our freedom, but freedom is not duty free. Limits to nature are the areas of life that our freedom cannot budge. Our freedom needs to work with the limits set by our bodies, and our physical environment. Freedom has a price and the price is responsibility. 4. Utilitarianism is the opposite of Kantian ethics as it is duty free, and it is defined as that which provides for the greatest pleasure or well being for the greatest number. Utilitarianism has to distinctive parts, and they are: appetite and desire. Utilitarianism is irrational, it deals with finding a pleasure that is short term and not good will that is long term, so 5. Prudence is what makes...

Words: 375 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Tyranny of the Majority

...Freedom is one of the most vulnerable things in human’s life. Since the beginning of life, mankind has tried to become free. When we look at the dusty pages of history, it is obvious that, roughly all wars and struggles in history stem from passion of freedom. The importance and necessity of freedom is indisputable and M.Roshwald (2000) emphasized the importance of freedom with these words; ‘’Give me liberty, or give me death’’ (p.1). However, in today’s world, freedom is limited by dictators or majorities. J.S.Mill (1859), claims that, majority, which means the most active part of the society, may desire to oppress minorities and precautions are needed against this abuse of power. Mill raised awareness and warned against tyranny of majority. Social tyranny is more formidable than political oppressions, because tyranny of majority limits freedom of thought, prevents social progress, which is the beginning of all corruptions, and it is more difficult to escape and severer to endure than oppressive political regimes. First of all, majority’s opinions, values and norms determine all society’s values and point of views. Tyranny of majority can manipulates and suppresses minority’s thoughts and opinions. One step further, social tyranny may limit freedom of thought. According to K.Stone (2008), ‘’ Social tyranny penetrates even more deeply into everyday life, into the soul itself’’ (p.1). Starting from this point of view, tyranny of majority has a great power hence; it can manipulate...

Words: 1613 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

R V Coldin Analysis

...sections? As evident in the article, section 2b: “freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication,” applies to this case. In this issue, a nudist named Brian Coldin, states that his freedom of expression has been infringed upon as he is charged with several counts of public nudity because of his lifestyle. In Canada, certain laws in forbid this act, which directly affects the ability of a nudist to express themselves. In response to this, Coldin’s lawyer, Clayton Ruby, has said that these charges have limited the expression of nudists and suggest that these laws infringe on Charter rights. However, witnesses have also claimed that seeing Coldin nude in public has caused trauma and unease. But, despite these...

Words: 958 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The Federalist John Jay

... so the government had in turn provided more security for the people. Though, many citizens would never have known that for more security, the people would be required to give up some freedom. This does not mean that more security of the nation is erroneous, by no means of course. The Constitution states that the job of the government is to “secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity,” so a threat to national security would therefore be a threat to the liberties of the people. They therefore go hand in hand. If the security of the nation is being threatened, the government must compromise freedoms to ensure security of the nation and freedoms. There has been other cases and examples where the government has had to limit freedoms to ensure security...

Words: 799 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Different Card Types

...establishments and withdraw cash in India. Use of State Bank Classic Debit & Shopping Card: For shopping at over 5 lakh merchant outlets in India. For booking movie tickets, bill payments, travel and other online purchases and payments over the internet using secure ‘Master Secure Code’/‘Verified by Visa’.  For withdrawing cash from State Bank Group ATMs or other ATMs in India.   Rewards Points: FreedomRewardz State Bank Debit Card Loyalty Program State Bank Classic Debit Card earns 2.5 Freedom Points (Reward points) for every ` 100 you shop, dine out, fill fuel, book travel or spend online. These Freedom Points earned can be accumulated and redeemed for exciting gifts. Please visit www.freedomrewardz.com for more information. Daily Cash Withdrawal & Transaction Limit State Bank Classic Debit & Shopping Card particulars Minimum Daily Cash Limit at ATMs Maximum Minimum Daily Point of Sales/eCommerce Limit Maximum Domestic ` 500/` 40,000/No such limit ` 50,000/- Card Type Digit Mastro Visa 16 16 For ATM For purchasing on POS/ME PIN Based Signature on fall back PIN Based Singnature on fall back For purchasing on internet CVV of three digit CVV of three digit By: Amit Kumar SMS Alert for Better Tracking Get instant SMS alerts for all Cash withdrawal/Purchase transactions/Online transactions made on your State Bank Classic Debit & Shopping Card. Issuance and Annual Maintenance Charges Particulars Issuance...

Words: 2017 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

R V. Keegstra Case Study

...In the cases R v Zundel and R v Keegstra the court states that the relationship between form and content in relation to freedom of expression are guaranteed by the Charter. Freedom of expression guarantees one’s freedom to express their own opinion, and beliefs. In addition, section 2(b) of the Charter does not guarantee ones protection from some forms of communicating statements. In R v Keegstra, Mr. Keegstra decides to express his opinion on the holocaust with his class. Furthermore while Mr. Keegstra unknowingly promotes hatred against jews. In Mr. Zundel case he promotes hatred through the publication of the statements that he knew to be false and that were likely to cause injury or mischief to a public interest. 2a) R v Zundel and R...

Words: 1327 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Walls Are Not Necessary in Modern Society

...people may think otherwise, saying that many metaphorical walls need to separate us in order to keep peace between certain things. Whether it be countries or certain groups of people. The other half of people that think differently, think that there would be no need for these “walls” if we could get rid of them slowly and find a way for everyone to work together. These barriers tend to have overall negative effects on people if they don’t have any “wiggle” room. These enclosures limit the freedom of an individual. They are no longer able to move about freely when you have certain barricades in the way. Next, dividers limit the person’s mindset. “Walls” can cause people to feel less than important by restricting their freedom of thought. And last, obstructions can end up causing problems or altercations. This is caused when a barrier is broken and the individual has to overcome the impending hurdles being thrown at them. “Walls” are not necessary in society because they limit freedom to “roam,” freedom to think, and they force people to have conflicts. “Good fences make good neighbors.” This is what the neighbor said in a poem by Robert Frost called Mending Wall. What the neighbor means is that “good fences” create good relations between both sides of the fence. While this may be true in a suburb, it has a larger effect in society. Compare the “fence” to the Berlin Wall. Shortly following Hitler’s death and World War II, East and West Germany were divided into two halves. West...

Words: 1470 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

No Man Is an Island

...that the independent media also provide a voice to the neglected and disadvantaged while simultaneously preventing governments from insulating themselves from public criticism. 2. LIMITS: Freedom of speech has to be UNCENSORED, because when you start putting limits or barriers where do you draw the line? When does it become manipulation of power? When you give the ability of putting limits in press you create the risk off putting this power in the hands to censure and manipulate news in their personal/ political interest. A free press is not a luxury. It’s the start of an equal development. The media can expose corruption. They can keep a check on public policy by throwing a spotlight on government action. They let people voice diverse opinions on governance and reform, and help build public consensus to bring about change. Such media help markets work better. They can facilitate trade, transmitting ideas and innovation across boundaries. The media are also important for human development, bringing health and education information to remote villages in countries from Uganda to Nicaragua. But as experience has shown, the independence of the media can be fragile and easily compromised. It is clear that to support development, media need the right environment-in terms of freedoms,...

Words: 959 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Polisci

...What is freedom? Freedom is the ability to act, think or speak freely without limitation. The United States of America is notorious for being founded on the basis of freedom and democracy. Freedom is an amazing thing to have but there are times where it is used excessively causing harm around us. It is wonderful to be able to express opinions but there should be a limit as to what we should say to others or in public. John Stuart Mill argues that the government must never censor its citizens, no matter their opinion and that is agreeable to certain extent. The Bill of Rights is one of the nations essential founding documents added to the constitution in 1791. The Bill of Rights are the first 10 amendments to the constitution that limit the power of the United Stated federal government and itemizes fundamental rights and liberties provided to the people. The Founding fathers wanted to create a strong national government in which its citizens were able to have a voice in what goes on in the government. Though the constitution had already certain rights protected for the citizens many argued that those amendments weren’t enough for many citizens. Thomas Jefferson, one of the founding fathers was pressuring the government to pass the bill of rights. “ A bill of rights he insisted is what the people are entitled to against every government on earth, general or particular and what no just government should refuse” (Bessette and Pitney p.57). In other words, Jefferson wanted the...

Words: 1344 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Sartre

...Sartre’s Bad Faith Sartre’s says that a man is free and responsible for himself. Many people can agree and many disagree, but Sartre’s has many good points in thinking this way. With freedom comes responsibility is a well-known saying. Which is basically part of what Sartre’s is trying to explain? Freedom is existence and source of all values. We are free to do what we want, but the things we do and the way you act determines your qualities. Each of us is responsible for everything we do because we are free to make our own decisions and choices. We are our choices and within everything we do we make a choice. Therefore, if you chose to do anything or whatever you have chosen to do, you are responsible for that choice. Even if you don’t choose, you have “chosen” to not choose, so you did still make a choice. You can only either chose sincerity or self-deception which is to be or not to be. According to Sartre’s, Bad faith is not accepting freedom and responsibility and the outcome of them. One of the main forms of bad faith believes in God. Humans use religion to escape from the reality of human situations. They try to escape because they can’t accept or deal with the consequences of human responsibility. Humans have to make decisions and live with their decisions; not God, nature, nor society has anything to do with it. Good faith is living in reality and accepting the fact that God does not exist.  Presidential candidate Herman Cain was accused of sexual harassment. He claims...

Words: 1010 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Auto Liberation

...Summary: In the essay, "Auto Liberation," Brent Knutson argues that we should repeal speed limits on U.S. highways. Knutson uses one scenario, the Japanese sports car's driver showed his excellent driving ability, to support his viewpoint. Knutson concludes by referring to personal freedoms of American citizens and the most compelling "driving fast is enjoyable" reason. Knutson also reports the opposite view, those people do not believe American drivers have the enough capacity of operating vehicles and driving without speed limits. And it's not responsive to others. Knutson claims that nowadays automobiles are able to travel safely at highways. The speed is not the cause of accidents but incompetence, alcohol or hazardous conditions. What’s more, Knutson states that some activities will make Americans drive responsibly, such as intensive driver-education, stringent licensing criteria and public-service announcement campaigns. Knutson also give some data which shows the accident rates declined since the interstate speed limits increased. Knutson concludes that we should take control of the automobiles and free from speed slavery. Test-Based Analysis: I disagree with Knutson's point of repealing speed limits on U.S. highways. First, the scenario Knutson presents in this essay is quite inconclusive. Then he claims that “In fact, there is solid reasoning to support...should be repealed,” The reader can only admit that this driver who drives the Japanese sports car has a pretty...

Words: 413 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Law Case

...441 2006 BCPC 67 Nanaimo Registry No. 57412-1 British Columbia Provincial Court (Criminal Division) Nanaimo, British Columbia Saunders Prov. Ct. J. Heard: November 1, 14 and 28, 2005. Judgment: January 20, 2006. Constitutional law — Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms — Fundamental freedoms — Freedom of expression — Reasonable limits — Oakes test — Motion to declare that a bylaw of the City of Nanaimo restricting large portable advertising boards to new businesses violated the Charter right to freedom of expression dismissed — City's objective to control proliferation of portable signs to address problem of visual pollution and balance public interests with commercial interests was pressing and substantive — Bylaw rationally connected to objective, as evidence indicated that number of signs dropped since bylaw — Bylaw minimally impaired right to freedom of expression, as smaller portable signs and other advertising means were available for businesses — Means used by city to address objective and its effects were proportional. Motion to declare that a bylaw of the City of Nanaimo restricting large portable advertising boards to new businesses violated the Charter right to freedom of expression — In order to curb proliferation of portable advertising signs, City of Nanaimo passed bylaw restricting use of portable boards 32 square feet in dimension to new businesses — Northridge Fitness Centre was a business located away from the highway that used a 32 square...

Words: 1940 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Freedom

...What is freedom? Is it an absolute right? We are born to become free. Freedom is defined from different aspects ,and according to different cultures, freedom varies from culture to another. Some define freedom as a natural right, the human being is born with. Everyone wants to be free and independent from others. Freedom is the right to do what one wants, live where he wants, eat what he wants, learns what he wants, and chooses the religion in which he believes, without ignoring or harming other rights. How can we live free? From my point of view, we can live free by respecting other’s rights to live free too. We cannot ignore the rights of people with whom we live in the society. We cannot simply do what we want and ignore others. We must take other people rights into consideration. The idea behind freedom is to be respectful and useful to our society. Freedom is important to everyone. If someone is derived from this innate right, he will definitely feel as if he is not a respectful human being. When freedom is guaranteed, I can think freely, go where i want, say my opinion without fear from people who would not like my opinion. Freedom of opinion is among the most important branches of freedom .In some societies where freedom of opinion is not guaranteed by the authority, the creativity of mind is killed and buried. Society is the largest and biggest loser from this lack of creativity. Someone once said, Freedom of opinion will never result in animosity among people if they...

Words: 887 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Freedom of the Press

...Some people believe that freedom of speech is something that should be limited when it come to sensitive information. I feel that if its limited it not freedom. This was a big problem. Note it was a problem. Its not the information that is so called sensitive it’s the public’s reaction to it that causes the problem I think the world only has a problem with freedom of press when it’s either about them or if its bad press. I have never seen anyone complaining about press that is in his or her favor or anything that is not in his or her favor Freedom of the press is defined by dictionary.com as the right to circulate opinion in print without censorship from the government. America’s Founding Fathers believed so strongly in the right to free speech that they codified it in the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which states in part, “Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press.” This right was considered so important it was the first of the ten freedoms protected by the Bill of Rights. So why should anyone think or feel that they can limit people on their right as humans. I see freedom of press as the same thing as freedom of speech. Most individual are fine with freedom of press until it hits home. So why take the right away when your in the spotlight. It just isn’t fair. I really don’t think that sensitive information sways people in the work plae one way or the other. For everything that said in the press there is...

Words: 904 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Freedom

...Therefore, freedom is not absolute. In the West where personal freedom is held in the highest esteem, there are still definable limits. Freedom of speech, in the words of an American jurist, does not include the freedom to yell “Fire!” in a crowded theatre, unless of course there is a fire. America has enshrined in its constitution the Bill of Rights with the specific purpose of protecting the civil liberties of its citizens. Among its provisions are the freedoms of speech, religion, and peaceful assembly, together with the rights of due process. These statutes notwithstanding, they did not protect Japanese Americans from being forcefully relocated and incarcerated during World War II, and more recently, the detention of thousands of Arab-Americans following the 9/11 attacks. Today the injustices perpetrated on those Japanese-Americans are widely acknowledged, but significantly, the Supreme Court decision affirming the legality of that mass detention has yet to be overturned. There will always be limits to freedom; the pertinent question is where those lines are drawn and the role they play in the ordinary lives of the citizens. Limits on human freedom can be viewed likewise. In America there are definite limits but they are more like the moat; the citizens are hardly aware of them. They are not intrusive. Executive powers to establish military tribunals for example, are definite boundaries and gross infringements on the citizens’ freedom. Similarly Canada has its War Powers...

Words: 912 - Pages: 4