Premium Essay

Literature Review Following Norreklit on Bsc (2000) (Draft)

In:

Submitted By patrick1
Words 857
Pages 4
The article written by Norreklit dates from 2000. Cooper et al provide an overview of the development of the BSC from conception to the present. They recognize four periods in the development of the BSC:
1. Assembling a local idea
This is the formative period in Analogue Devices (ADI) from 1985 to 1992. It was not a formal BSC. The focus here is on the initial concepts and how to build a network of support within the organization.
2. Building networks
In this period, the scorecard is conceptualized to the BSC. This is where the first acquaintance with the BSC originated outside of ADI and other organizations experiment with it went. With his idea of balance and the connection of the received quality to outcomes are herein BSC four perspectives model, also known as quadrant model.
3. Framing and generalists sing the BSC
BSC developed in this period of a more local solution to a generally applicable framework.
4. Extending and controlling networks
This period is characterized by continuous development of the BSC. Kaplan and Norton here are very actively involved in, in the form of consultancy, research and discussions with stakeholders. Here, they act to remain in the lead in the development of this method.
According to Kaplan and Norton, the development of the BSC through three phases:
1. From 1990 to 1996 the development of the BSC as a measurement system
2. From 1996 to 2002 the development of the BSC as a performance management system
3. From 2002 to 2009 the development of the BSC as a core competency, which replace the need for an external consultant is by itself be competent enough to do the implementation itself.
The observations and conclusions of Norreklit are thus placed in the "framing and generalists sing the BSC" stage according to Cooper et al and the phase "as BSC performance management system" according to Kaplan and Norton.
This is

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Dhaka City

...selecting performance measures in the framework of the balanced scorecard (BSC). Previous studies in the now well-investigated effect that decision makers tend to give a much higher weight to common measures compared to unique measures (Banker et al, 2004; Lipe and Salterio, 2000) did not explore differences between perspectives in terms of commonality of measures used for performance evaluation purposes. We will explain why there are common measures in all perspectives and which their shared characteristics are. Based on a simulation with graduate students, we argue that common measures are found in every BSC’s perspective but with a significant degree of difference. Financial measures are by far the most common ones, internal process measures are the least common ones with customer and learning ranging somewhere in between. Our study implies that the idea of standardization beyond financial measures is based on three performance measures characteristics: 1) reliance on data already available, 2) easy benchmarking, and 3) possibility of being audited by third parties. We advanced implications for managers and for future research on the information generated in the BSC. 1. INTRODUCTION. This paper has been motivated by the evidence of some limitations of the balanced scorecard (Lipe and Salterio, 2000; Banker et al., 2004). These authors examine the judgmental effects of the balanced scorecard (BSC) and found that when evaluating the performance of different strategic business...

Words: 5516 - Pages: 23

Premium Essay

Business

...Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION 1 LITERATURE REVIEW 2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 3 METHODS OF RESEARCHING 3 METHODS FOR INVESTIGATION 3 II. PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT 4 1. INTRODUCTION 4 2. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT OF SEAPRODEX 5 III. ACTIVITIES AND ENVIRONMENT 7 1. THE MAIN ACTIVITIES 7 2. APPROPRIATE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT TOOLS 7 IV. MANAGING PERFORMANCE TO IMPROVE DECISION-MAKING 9 1. BUSINESS LEVEL STRATEGY OF SEAPRODEX 9 2. STRATEGY FOMULATION 9 3. PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVIES OF SEAPRODEX 10 4. BALANCED SCORECARD IMPLEMENTATION OF SEAPRODEX 10 5. TOOLS TO INFORM DECISION MARKING THROUGH PERFORMANCE 11 V. CONCLUSION AND RECOMENDATION 11 1. REVIEW AND RESULT FINDING 11 2. RECOMMENDATION FOR AREA IMPROVEMENT 12 VI. APPENDICES 15 INVESTIGATION RESULT SUMMARY 23 SEAPRODEX BACKGROUND 23 Performance Management at strategic level 24 Performance Objective 25 VII. REFERENCES 27 I. INTRODUCTION It is realized that the most of manufacturing company is to get competitive advantage in the industry, or to get high quality in products and services. To get these competitive edges and maintain the position in the market, company needs to have an excellent operation management system or strategic performance management within the organization, as supported by Fryer et al. (2009). It is no doubt about the benefits and advantage of the strategic performance management system because De Waal (2007, p. 19) offers his perception of strategic...

Words: 6594 - Pages: 27