Free Essay

Literature Review

In: English and Literature

Submitted By alemag123
Words 2913
Pages 12
Literature Review Handout

Liberty University
Online Writing Center

Handout Description A review of literature is a critical analysis of a portion of the published body of knowledge available through the use of summary, classification, and comparison of previous research studies, reviews of literature, and journal articles (“How to Write a Literature Review”, 2012). This handout discusses the reasons for writing a literature review and presents its various requirements. It examines what a literature review is, as well as what it is not; it distinguishes between the literature review and the annotated bibliography. Like many academic writing assignments, there is not one universal standard for writing a literature review. Its format can differ from discipline to discipline and from assignment to assignment. There is, however, an overall structure that is commonly used across various disciplines, and this format is examined in more detail. The handout concludes with some helpful “tips and tricks” for preparing a literature review.

Disclaimer: The content of a literature review may vary from discipline to discipline and from assignment to assignment. The literature review content recommended in this handout is that which is most commonly included. If in doubt about what you should include in your literature review, please consult your professor. Literature Review Handout

Defining a Literature Review
What is a literature review?
A literature review examines the current scholarly work available on a particular subject, perhaps within a given time period (“Writing Center Handouts”, n.d.). It is not merely a summation of the existing work; its purpose is to analyze critically the applicable “published body of knowledge” (“The Writer’s Handbook”, 2012) in order to establish the current knowledge of that topic (“How to Write a Literature Review”, 2012). The literature review is more than a survey of various sources, but it is not a book review (“How to Write a Literature Review”, 2012). It is the summary and synthesis of material gathered from various sources and organized to address an issue, research objective, or problem statement (“Writing Center Handouts”, n.d.). A well-written literature review may even state what research has yet to be done (“Writing Center Handouts”, n.d.). A literature review, then, must do these things: * be organized around and related directly to the thesis or research question being developed * synthesize results into a summary of what is and is not known * identify areas of controversy in the literature * formulate questions that need further research (Taylor, n.d.).
Why do a literature review?
A literature review gives an overview of a specific field of inquiry (“Writing a Literature Review, n.d.). It asks questions concerning the prevailing theories and hypotheses, the key researchers, the current state of the research, and the methods and methodologies being used (“Writing a Literature Review”, n.d.). The literature review helps the potential researcher identify the research question, focus the topic of inquiry, understand the makeup of a particular research question, understand an idea’s genetic roots, and understand the “current conceptual landscape” (“Literature Review” n.d.). In other words, the literature review shows the potential researcher how prevailing ideas fit into his/her own thesis and how his/her thesis agrees or differs from them (“Writing a Literature Review, n.d.). It also points out major methodological flaws or gaps in research, inconsistencies in theory and findings, and areas or issues pertinent to future study (“The Writer’s Handbook”, 2012).
What are the differences?
How does a literature review differ from other writing assignments? A literature review is not a research paper, although, like other forms of expository writing, it does use well-formed paragraphs and a logical structure. However, where a research paper uses relevant literature to support the discussion of the thesis; “in a literature review, the literature itself is the subject of discussion” (“Writing a Literature Review, n.d.). The literature review may be a self-contained unit, that is an end in itself, or it may be preface to engaging in primary research (“The Writer’s Handbook”, 2012). The literature review itself does not present any new primary scholarship (“Write a Literature Review”, n.d.).
How does a literature review differ from an annotated bibliography? A literature review is also not an annotated bibliography, although it may be produced from an annotated bibliography (“Literature Review”, n.d.). An annotated bibliography is a listing of references, which includes a single paragraph descriptive analysis of each work listed (“Literature Review”, n.d.). On the other hand, a literature review is an essay in itself, which summarizes and evaluates already published arguments about a certain topic (“Difference Between Annotated Bibliography and Literature Review”, 2011). A literature review is a piece of “discursive prose, not a list describing or summarizing one piece of literature after another”—that is an annotated bibliography (Taylor, n.d.).
A literature review is also not to be confused with a book review, as the literature review offers an overview of significant literature published on a topic (“Write a
Literature Review”, n.d.). Nor is a literature review a literary review, which is a “brief, critical discussion about the merits and weaknesses of a literary work, such as a play, novel, or book of poems” (“Researching and Writing Literature Reviews”, 2011).
Writing a Literature Review
Writing a literature review requires four stages: problem formulation, literature search, data evaluation, and analysis and interpretation (“Researching and Writing Literature Reviews”, 2011).
Problem Formulation
The purpose of problem formulation is to define which topic or field is being examined and to identify its component issues (“Write a Literature Review”, n.d.).
This stage is similar to the development of a thesis statement for a research paper. The researcher must identify the specific thesis, problem, or research question that the subsequent review of literature will help to define. According to Spiller (2010), one should choose a current, well-studied, specific topic.
Literature Search
The literature search finds materials relevant to the subject being explored (“Write a Literature Review”, n.d.). This step may sound easier than it actually is. The Columbia University Writing Center suggests the following strategy: 1. Identify and find the “big names” and best publications in the research area. 2. Conduct an online literature search. 3. Look in bibliographies of the most recent books and journal articles. 4. Avoid the popular press, such as the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and Wikipedia (“Writing Center Handouts”, n.d.).
As always, make sure to write down the full bibliographic details of each book or article as soon as you find a reference to it. Many abstracting journals and electronic databases are available through the University Library.
The minimum number of references needed depends upon what the review is for and what stage you are in in your studies. As a general rule, an undergraduate review should use between five and twenty titles, depending on the level. A master’s thesis should use over forty, and a doctoral dissertation should use over fifty (“Writing a Literature Review, n.d.).
Data Evaluation
Data evaluation involves determining which literature makes a significant contribution to the understanding of the topic (“Write a Literature Review”, n.d.). According to the American University Library, ask the following questions about the material you are including: 1. “Has the author formulated a problem/issue? 2. Is it clearly defined? Is its significance (scope, severity, relevance) clearly established? 3. Could the problem have been approached more effectively from another perspective? 4. What is the author’s research orientation (e.g., interpretive, critical science, combination)? 5. What is the author’s theoretical framework (e.g., psychological, developmental, feminist)? 6. What is the relationship between the theoretical and research perspectives? 7. Has the author evaluated the literature relevant to the problem/issue? Does the author include literature taking positions she or he does not agree with? 8. In a research study, how good are the basic components of the study design (e.g., population, intervention, outcome)? How accurate and valid are the measurements? Is the analysis of the data accurate and relevant to the research question? Are the conclusions validly based upon the data and analysis? 9. In material written for popular readership, does the author use appeals to emotion, one-sided examples, or rhetorically-charged language and tone? Is there an objective basis to the reasoning, or is the author merely ‘proving’ what he or she already believes?
10.How does the author structure the argument? Can you ‘deconstruct’ the flow of the argument to see whether or where it breaks down logically (i.e., in establishing cause-effect relationships)?
11.In what ways does this book or article contribute to our understanding of the problem under study, and in what ways is it useful for practice? What are the strengths and limitations?
12.How does this book or article relate to the specific thesis or question I am developing?” (“Literature Review Tutorial”, n.d.).
Spiller (2010) suggests the following strategy: read the easier articles first; scan the article for key points; then read for depth; and finally, allow enough time.
Analysis and Interpretation
This stage involves discussing the findings and conclusions of pertinent literature (“Write a Literature Review”, n.d.). Apply the principles of analysis to identify unbiased and valid studies; specifically, compare and contrast information or arguments between sources (“Annotated Bibliography & Literature Review”, n.d.). All pertinent facts need to be organized in a systematic way. Columbia University’s Writing Center suggests the following steps to critically assessing the material:
“List three questions you want answered by the material. 1. Summarize the major points the author makes. 2. How does the author support his/her position (specific facts, details, etc.)? 3. Were the three questions raised concerning the article answered? List answers. If not, what questions did the author subsequently raise and answer? 4. Evaluate the article, with consideration for the following: 5. What are its strengths and/or weaknesses? 6. Is the subject covered adequately? 7. Is the author’s position adequately supported? 8. Is it biased, balanced, etc.? 9. Do you agree with the author’s position and why?” (“Writing Center Handouts”, n.d.).
“In assessing each piece, consideration should be given to: * Provenance—What are the author’s credentials? Are the author’s arguments supported by evidence (e.g., primary historical material, case studies, narratives, statistics, recent scientific findings)? * Objectivity—Is the author’s perspective even-handed or prejudicial? Is contrary data considered or is certain pertinent information ignored to prove the author’s point? * Persuasiveness—Which of the author’s theses are most/least convincing? * Value—Are the author’s arguments and conclusions convincing? Does the work ultimately contribute in any significant way to an understanding of the subject?” (“Write a Literature Review”, n.d.).
Structuring the Literature Review
While there is no general standard for structuring a literature review, most formats contain common elements organized in a particular manner; this handout offers that structure. Remember that this is not a “boilerplate” format that can be used in every situation, but rather one that has widespread use among the various disciplines. Be sure to contact your professor concerning any differences between the format shown here and that of your individual assignment.
Introduction
The purpose of the introduction is to define or identify the general topic, issue, or area of concern, thus providing an appropriate context for reviewing the literature (“The Writer’s Handbook”, 2012). The introduction must present the specific research hypothesis, purpose of the research, or questions about the topic under consideration. The thesis statement or statement of significance must be specific to the topic under consideration. The use of first person is permitted (“How to Write a Literature Review, 2012).
The introduction should also point out overall trends in what has been published about the topic; or conflicts in theory, methodology, evidence, and conclusions; or gaps in research and scholarship, or a single problem or new perspective of immediate interest. Finally, it should establish the writer’s reason (point of view) for reviewing the literature; explain the criteria to be used in analyzing and comparing literature and the organization of the review (sequence); and, when necessary, state why certain literature is or is not included (scope) (“The Writer’s Handbook”, 2012).
Body
The purpose of the body is to group research studies and other types of literature
(reviews, theoretical articles, case studies, etc.) according to common denominators such as qualitative versus quantitative approaches, conclusions of authors, specific purpose or objective, chronology, etc. (“The Writer’s Handbook”,
2012). The body of the review should be presented in essay form and should not be a list of the resources used in researching the topic (“How to Write a Literature Review, 2012). The following is one example of how various sources should be summarized and synthesized in a narrative form:
This is one point of my paper. Here is source A and how it relates to this point. Source A additionally states this, this, and this. Source A contributes this to the field. However, Source A does not cover that, that, and that. Source B refutes A’s conclusion. Source B’s conclusion points to this, that, and the other thing. Source B also points this out and supports my point.
Source C corroborates with B in the following ways. Additionally, Source C says this and that. However, Source D disagrees with Source C, attributing another cause. In fact, Source D supports Source A’s conclusion by stating that this causes that and not the other way around. But Source D…
(“Annotated Bibliographies”, n.d.)
The body of the review should report the findings of the previous research on a topic, not just the methodologies and measurements used in the research. It should point out trends and themes, as well as gaps in the literature, that is, it should synthesize results into a summary of what is and is not known and formulate questions that need further research (Taylor, n.d.). Direct quotations should be used sparingly. Details of the literature being cited should be reported sparingly, as well (“How to Write a Literature Review”, 2012). It should provide the reader with strong “umbrella” statements at beginnings of paragraphs, “signposts” throughout, and brief “so what” summary sentences at intermediate points in the review to aid in understanding comparisons and analyses (“The Writer’s Handbook”, 2012). In other words, it should address how the material contributes to the understanding of the problem under study, how it is useful for practice, and how it relates to the specific thesis or question being developed (Taylor, n.d.).
Conclusion
The conclusion should summarize major pieces of significant studies and articles to the body of knowledge under review, maintaining the focus established in the introduction. It should also evaluate the current “state of the art” for the body of knowledge reviewed, pointing out major methodological flaws or gaps in the research, inconsistencies in theory and findings, and areas or issues pertinent to future study. Finally, it should conclude by providing some insight into the relationship between the central topic of the literature review and a larger area of study such as a discipline, a scientific endeavor, or a profession (“The Writer’s Handbook”, 2012).
Final Thoughts
Spiller (2010) provides the following tips for writing the literature review: * Make yourself comfortable. * Don’t start writing too early. * Leave time for breaks. * Use specific language and support your arguments with concrete examples. * Paraphrase, don’t quote. * Evaluate what you report.  Avoid plagiarism.
If done well, your literature review should show other researchers that you have done your homework and are qualified to contribute to the field. Further information on writing a literature review may be found in the resources listed in the Reference List.

References

Annotated bibliography & literature review. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://acdrupal.evergreen.edu/tsps/node/66
Difference between annotated bibliography and literature review. (2011, January 14). Retrieved from http://www.differencebetween.net/language/difference-between-annotatedbibliography-and-literature-review/
Lausch, S. (2011). Annotated bibliographies and literature reviews. Retrieved from http://associatedcontent.com/shared/print.shtml?content_type.
Literature review. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://data.fen-om.com/int460/0-literature-review.pdf
Literature review tutorial. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://subjectguides.library.american.edu/litreview
Plummer, B. G. (n.d.). The changing face of diplomatic history: A literature review. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/30037016?uid=2&uid=4&sid=21103253235891
Reece, G. (2002). Critical thinking and transferability: A review of the literature. Retrieved from www.library.american.edu/Help/tutorials/lit_review/critical_thinking.pdf
Researching and writing literature reviews. (2011, December 7) Retrieved from http://www.library.arizona.edu/help/tutorials/litreviews/whatis.html
Sample literature review. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.cgu.edu/pages/931.asp
Spiller, L. (2010). Writing a Psychology Literature Review. Retrieved from http://www.psych.uw.edu/psych.php#p=339
How to write a literature review. (2012, May 7). Retrieved from http://libguides.uah.edu/content.php?pid=46160
Taylor, D. (n.d.). The literature review: A few tips on conducting it. Retrieved from http://www.writing.utoronto.ca/advice/specific-types-of-writing/literaturereview
Write a literature review. (n.d.) Retrieved from http://library.ucsc.edu/print/help/howto/write-aliterature-review
Writing a literature review. (n.d.) Retrieved from http://www.canberra.edu.au/studyskills/writing/literature
The writer’s handbook: Learn how to write a review of literature. (2012, July 2) Retrieved from http://writing.wisc.edu/Handbook/ReviewofLiterature.html Writing center handouts: Preparing for a literature review. (n.d.) Retrieved from http://socialwork.columbia.edu/student-resources/forms-documents-library#Writing-Center-Hand-outs

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Literature Review

...Nursing http://jsn.sagepub.com/ Literature Reviews as a Research Strategy Julia Muennich Cowell The Journal of School Nursing 2012 28: 326 DOI: 10.1177/1059840512458666 The online version of this article can be found at: http://jsn.sagepub.com/content/28/5/326 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com On behalf of: National Association of School Nurses Additional services and information for The Journal of School Nursing can be found at: Email Alerts: http://jsn.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://jsn.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav >> Version of Record - Sep 25, 2012 What is This? Downloaded from jsn.sagepub.com by guest on August 26, 2013 Editorial The Journal of School Nursing 28(5) 326-327 ª The Author(s) 2012 Reprints and permission: sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/1059840512458666 http://jsn.sagepub.com Literature Reviews as a Research Strategy Literature reviews have long been important strategies to assess the state of the science. As early as 1993, Broome (1993) recommended literature reviews as a strategy to assist in the development of concepts. Many graduate students in nursing and other sciences learn about synthesizing literature throughout their academic programs using a variety of guides including Cooper’s (1998) Synthesizing Research: A Guide for Literature Reviews as a common reference or......

Words: 1365 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Literature Review Template

...Writing Centre Literature Review Template Definition: A literature review is an objective, critical summary of published research literature relevant to a topic under consideration for research. Its purpose is to create familiarity with current thinking and research on a particular topic, and may justify future research into a previously overlooked or understudied area. A typical literature review consists of the following components: 1. Introduction:  A concise definition of a topic under consideration (this may be a descriptive or argumentative thesis, or proposal), as well as the scope of the related literature being investigated. (Example: If the topic under consideration is ‘women’s wartime diaries’, the scope of the review may be limited to published or unpublished works, works in English, works from a particular location, time period, or conflict, etc.) The introduction should also note intentional exclusions. (Example: “This review will not explore the diaries of adolescent girls.”) Another purpose of the introduction is to state the general findings of the review (what do most of the sources conclude), and comment on the availability of sources in the subject area.   2. Main Body:    There are a number of ways to organize the evaluation of the sources. Chronological and thematic approaches are each useful examples. Each work should be critically summarized and evaluated for its premise, methodology, and conclusion. It is as important to address......

Words: 322 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Literature Review

...Chaboyer W, McMurray A, Wallis M. Bedside nursing handover: A case study, International Journal of Nursing Practice 2010: 16:27-34 | Level I:  Evidence from a systematic review or meta-analysis of all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or evidence-based clinical practice. | This research aimed to better understand the structures, processes and perceived outcomes of bedside nursing handover as a beginning step to facilitate its implementation. | Randomized control trial, clinical trial. | 532 bedside handovers, 34 interviews with nurses. Six wards in two hospitals in Austrailia. 3 medical, 1 surgical, 1 medsurge, 1 rehabilitation ward. Semistructured observation and interviews. | SBAR was used in 45-65% of handovers in 3 situations when: patients were new or condition changed, patients were unfamiliar to staff such as when staff had been off for a few days, or casual/agency staff were part of the team. On average each bedside handover took just over a minute. | Before handover patient handover was completed and handover sheet updated. Just before handover pts were informed that handover would shortly take place and were asked if they required any assistance in order to limit disruptions during handover, visitors were excused. Information was prompted by pts presence. Safety scan and medication review was done. Kept handover short and simple and to the point. Information found might be used as the basis for standard operating protocols for more widespread......

Words: 267 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Review of the Related Literature and Studies

...Review of the Related Literature and Studies A researcher needs to review the write-ups, readings, and studies related to the present study in order to determine the similarities and differences of the findings between the past and present studies Related Literature * Literature maybe defined as written works collectively, especially those enduring importance, exhibiting creative imagination and artist skill which are written in a particular period, language, and subject. * In other words, any written matter such as book, journal, magazine, novel, poetry, and encyclopedia are considered as literature. Guidelines on Effective writing of Literature 1. Research paper must be written in a formal style, which is in the third person, not the first person. 2. Avoid highly descriptive writing style, not appropriate for a scholarly research. 3. Language should be neutral gender, no sexy language like his. 4. Make the conclusion and contradictions found in the literature clear in the report. 5. Use proper grammar and proofread the work. 6. Never plagiarized, give credit to the original author of ideas. 7. Pay attention to the structure and form of published articles, which are good examples of how literature reviews can be written. Example 1. Peters (1993) claims that job-related stress can enhance productivity up to a certain point. There is, however, a threshold point beyond which stress becomes a harmful factor in one’s productivity.......

Words: 909 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

How to Write a Literature Review

...How to write a Literature Review: Step 1: Read a lot. Sounds simplistic, but the fact is that you do have to read a lot, and read with care and purpose. There are things that you can do within the process to make your life easier, and the purpose of this short document is to point some of them out. Hopefully, this will help. However, there is no substitute for good, thorough, and hard work. When you start your reading, start broadly. If you have an area you are interested in, such as computers in education, multi-media, distance education, web-based instruction, or some other specific concentration, start your reading in those areas. Course assigned reading will help, but you will have to branch outwards and inwards. Don’t be afraid to follow an area that seems not to be related to your area. You are trying to define your interests. Allow yourself the freedom to do that. Here are some tips on how you might branch out, and/or focus in: A. Look carefully at the references. Should the author raise a salient point that interests you and they happen to cite somebody, look up the citation and read the original source. The original source will have its own references, follow these. Repeat as necessary. B. Read from tangentially related fields. Don’t be afraid to look outside of the literature in IT to other areas. Educational Psychology, Human Resources, Computer Science, and Communications Studies are but a few of the related fields with important......

Words: 1603 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Undertaking a Literature Review in Marketing

...Introduction By general agreement and on the basis of first hand experience, the review of literature in most student research (and some professional academic research too) is clumsy, naive, turgid, confusing and often down right dull. But given the central importance the literature review holds in our academic writing tradition, and its pivotal role in the academic assessment of research why are we still executing them so badly? Specifically, why do students find them so difficult to write? And academics find them so disheartening to read? There is no shortage of guidance in how to undertake a literature review. Comprehensive guides to business research such as Gill and Johnson (1991) or Cooper (1989) contain some guidance. More comprehensive are the general thesis guides such as Dunleavy (2003), Teitelbaum (1998), Baker (2003), or Evans (1996). There are also many specific guides to undertaking a literature review such as Baker (2000), Rowley and Slack (2004) or Hart (1999). Indeed, any competent trawl of the internet will generate innumerable guides and resources from universities around the world. The issue it seems is not the lack of guidance, but how such guidance is translated into the finished product. As a consequence this article focuses upon how to write the literature review, some techniques that can be used to ^ Correspondence: Mark Gabbott, Department of Marketing, Monash University, P.O. Box 197, Caulfield East Melbourne, Vic 3145, Australia, Tel: 00 61 3......

Words: 8854 - Pages: 36

Free Essay

Course Project Milstone #1 Picot Literature and Review

...of the milestone will include identification of the problem or concern using the PICOT format and a literature search to find evidence to support an intervention that will change the outcomes. COURSE OUTCOMES This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes: CO4 Develops and outlines a scientific, systematic decision-making process to integrate critical thinking with clinical judgment to assure safe and effective outcomes. (PO #4) CO8 Selects evidence for best practice when planning professional nursing care for individuals, families, aggregates, and communities. (PO #8) DUE DATE Milestone #1 consists of the completion of one worksheet that contains to parts (i.e., the PICOT portion and the Literature Search portion). Submit the worksheet with the two portions completed to the Dropbox by the end of Week 2. POINTS This milestone is worth 200 points (100 for each portion of the worksheet). DIRECTIONS 1. Read this document including the grading rubrics below. 2. Download the PICOT/Literature Search Worksheet from Doc Sharing.Consider what is the nursing problem or issue that you have uncovered. Make sure it is related to a nursing, i.e., one that a nurse can solve independently. Do not select a medical problem that is dependent upon a medical professional to resolve. Completion of this portion of the worksheet will offer a tool for your literature search. 3. For theLiterature Search portion of the worksheet, find AT LEAST SIX (6)studies to......

Words: 1241 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Literature Review In Literature

...2.1 Introduction After the discussion about the introduction of the study, this chapter will discuss about the important aspects in this study. This chapter is very important part in any research because every element in it will be highlighted. It is because the related data in literature review and useful information will give advantage to the researcher to conclude the research. The other researcher also can use it as the guidelines to their research. Literature review is a systematic and through search of published literature in order to identify as many items as possible on particular topic. Thus, literature review is important for new researcher in order to understand better and get some info from previous research. In addition, literature...

Words: 840 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Literature Review

...Global Conference for Wikimedia 6 - 10 August 2014 · London FIND OUT MORE Close Literature review From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia For a focused scientific review, see Systematic review. [hide]This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. This article includes a list of references, but its sources remain unclear because it has insufficient inline citations. (November 2010) This article needs attention from an expert on the subject. (May 2014) A literature review is a text of a scholarly paper, which includes the current knowledge including substantive findings, as well as theoretical and methodological contributions to a particular topic. Literature reviews use secondary sources, and do not report new or original experimental work.[1] Contents [hide] 1 Types of Literature Reviews 2 Distinguishing between Process and Product 3 See also 4 References 5 Further reading Types of Literature Reviews[edit] Most often associated with academic-oriented literature, such as a thesis or peer-reviewed article, a literature review usually precedes a research proposal and results section. Its main goals are to situate the current study within the body of literature and to provide context for the particular reader. Literature reviews are a staple for research in nearly every academic field.[2] A systematic review is a literature review focused on a research question, trying to identify, appraise, select and......

Words: 1430 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Literature Review

...What is a literature review? Put simply, it is an analysis of prior academic research so as to identify the who, what, where, and whys’ of the chosen topic area. You may or may not have conducted what some academics call a preliminary study – a brief search into the existing academic work in your chosen topic. After all, for some students carrying out primary research it’s vital that their work has never been carried out before and these initial studies are crucial when identifying a unique topic for research. In some subject areas, it may be difficult, if not impossible to identify areas for primary research and therefore a preliminary study may not be necessary (secondary research is usually carried out as a result). Whatever the starting point, the literature review forms one of the first major pieces of work in a dissertation. There are several main reasons why you would undertake a literature review. The first is to enable you, the author, to become absolutely clear on what it is you have chosen to research and study. By understanding other academic literature you can gain an understanding of what has been and is currently being researched. This will help with your own work by identifying windows of opportunity and helping to cement your research questions. For some subjects you may find there has not been much prior research in your field of study, in which case your literature review will have to be less specific and the academic net in which you search will have to......

Words: 2651 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Literature Review

...Writing a Literature Review What is a Literature Review? A literature review is a survey and discussion of the literature in a given area of study. It is a concise overview of what has been studied, argued, and established about a topic, and it is usually organized chronologically or thematically. A literature review is written in essay format. It is not an annotated bibliography, because it groups related works together and discusses trends and developments rather than focusing on one item at a time. It is not a summary; rather, it evaluates previous and current research. Purpose A literature review is written to highlight specific arguments and ideas in a field of study. By highlighting these arguments, the writer attempts to show what has been studied in the field, and also where the weaknesses, gaps, or areas needing further study are. The review should therefore also demonstrate to the reader why the writer’s research is useful, necessary, important, and valid. Audience Literature reviews can have different types of audiences, so consider why and for whom you are writing your review. For example, a lot of literature reviews are written as a chapter for a thesis or dissertation, so the audience will want to know in what way your research is important and original. Highlighting the gap in knowledge which your research aims to fill is particularly important in this instance because you need to convince the reader that there is an opening in the area of study. A......

Words: 1153 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Literature Review

...Doing a literature review This Advice Sheet introduces you to the basics of compiling a Literature review. What is a literature review? 1 What it is not …. 1 Approaches needed …. 1 Approaching your review …. 2 Writing the review …. 3 What is a literature review? • • • Further reading …. 4 • It is a critical and evaluative account of what has been published on a chosen research topic. Its purpose is to summarise, synthesise and analyse the arguments of others. (It is not an academic research paper, the main purpose of which is to support your own argument.) You should describe and analyse the knowledge that exists and what gaps occur in research related to your field of interest. (This should clarify the relationship between your own research and the work that has previously been done.) It should reveal similarities and differences, consistencies and inconsistencies and controversies in previous research. What it is not It is not primarily an argument for the importance of what it is you are researching. While it is necessary to explain what is the primary purpose of your research, the reader of a literature review will assume that the need for undertaking the research has already been established. It is not a descriptive list of papers or summaries. You must not just list your sources and describe them in detail one at a time. A literature review is organised around ideas, not the sources themselves as an annotated bibliography would be organised. You......

Words: 1290 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Literature Review

...How to improve efficiency of organization Literature Review Tanshu Song BUS 551 University of La Verne The effective of an organization is concern by every managers. It was an important innovation in business management. Organizational effectiveness considers how well an organization performs business. In the present prospectus, the research will focus on effective management style and individuals behaviour which will impact on the efficiency of organization. The following literature reviews will attempt to show the information related to prospectus and demonstrate the analysis. In the research article by William Clark and Ray Wright (2009), they mentions the challenge which organizations will face in next several years. Increasing pressure to do more with fewer workers, growing demand for strategic new services, expected loss of legacy management skills and need for automated solutions. Then they provide a solution which can capture the knowledge of retiring workers and perform many tasks necessary to manage both legacy and distributed systems. This wide range of solutions that enable knowledge retention and automate the process workflow to provision and maintain IT services specifically. “By taking advantage of the wide range of solutions for automating management tasks, the agency can benefit from the ability to create automated, repeatable processes, reduce the need to replace retiring workers, improve ability to recruit new......

Words: 714 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Review of the Literature

...Caring for Inmate-Patients: A Review of the Literature Caring for Inmate-Patients In 2010, approximately one in every 27 adults (2.8 million) in the United States was behind bars according to a report from the National Commission on Correctional Health Care (NCCHC), 2012. Maintaining a safe and secure environment is the most important mission of correctional facilities - not healthcare.  Correctional nurses are challenged to provide inmate healthcare services in a caring relationship that promotes wellness, restores health, and facilitates healing. A great deal has been written by nursing theorists regarding a caring attitude, and that it is fundamental to the nurse’s role. No other health care setting presents such limitations to nurses’ free expression of caring. The purpose of this paper is to conduct a review of the literature on how nurses balance the culture of security and the culture of care while delivering health care to inmate-patients in a correctional setting. Analysis It is well documented in the nursing literature that nursing care for prisoners is both complicated and conflicting. These findings clearly stated that the experiences of caring for inmate-patients vary greatly from that of any other health care setting. Both the infrastructure of a prison coupled with its restrictive security element, directly affects how the health care of inmate-patients is delivered. This is in direct correlation with the findings of Mathis & Schoenly, 2008;......

Words: 1980 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Review Literature

...2. LITERATURE REVIEW. In the context of India’s tea export, there exists vast literatures .But for this study we have included some of the important empirical works which are matched with our objectives. Chand and Tiwari,(1991),analyzead growth and instability of India’s export and import of agricultural commodities. Jaganathan , (1992) , in his paper examined the instabilities of export earnings of selected groups and selected commodities and all the commodities from the period 1974-75 to 1989-1990. Pal , (1992) , analyzed the magnitude , causes and effects of instability of agricultural export earnings of India for the period 1979 to 1989.Subramaniam , (1995) , analyzed the impact of fluctuations in tea production and exports on international tea trade .He articulated that India plays a significant role in world tea trade , being the world’s largest producer , consumer , and exporter . Therefore , fluctuations in India’s tea production , consumption and exports are enough to disturb international tea trade . Aiello , (1999) , analyzed that the effects of export earnings instability on economic growth of developing countries has long interested economists for several reasons . Reddy , (2001) , examined global demand for and supply of tea by estimating semi – log trends separately using data of the recent past , 1974 to 1988 , on the area under cultivation of tea , production , export and retention of tea for domestic consumption . Debraj , (2003) , in a......

Words: 4447 - Pages: 18