...ELECTRICAL & COMPUTER FACULTY OF ENGINEERING VACATION INTERNSHIP REPORT Name of Student: ____Hou Liwen ___ Matric No. _A0105595B __ Course/Year/Training Period: ___Electrical Engineering/2014/12/5-1/8 Student’s Email Address: __A0105595@NUS.EDU.SG Name of Mentor: __Chen Zhi Ning_____ Name of Company: __Surbana Technologies Pte Ltd _____ ______ 1 Vacation Internship Report 2 AT Surbana Technologies Pte. Ltd. Reporting Period: 23/06/2014-01/08/2014 Submitted by: Hou Liwen A0105595B Dept/Year of Studies Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering The National University of Singapore 2014 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I INTRODUCTION II THE TRAINING ASSIGNMENTS III CONCLUSION Student Feedback form Student Log Sheet VIP Report Clearance Form 4 5 6 23 24 26 27 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The vacation internship program is a golden opportunity for learning and self-development. I consider myself very lucky and honored to have such a wonderful opportunity to be an intern at Surbana Technologies Pte. Ltd and have so many helpful knowledgeable people lead me through in completion of my internship program. I wish to express my indebted gratitude and special thanks to Mr Louis Tay who in spite of being extraordinarily busy with his duties, took time out to hear, guide and keep me on the correct path and allowing me to carry out my internship at his esteemed organization. I do not know where I would be without him. I also...
Words: 5334 - Pages: 22
...Lauren Liwen MBA 608 Dr. Turek Cranston Coils Regression Case Executive Summary The Cobb-Douglas cost function of Cranston Coils was found using output, capital, and labor data from their eighteen plants. The cost function, Q = (0.40692) K0.32477 L0.79466, was used to determine the short-run cost equations of total cost, average cost, average variable cost and marginal cost. Calculations using these equations gave rise to Cranston Coils cost structure, which predicts cash flow within the company. Cranston Coils’ cost function was also used to determine if a contract between Sleep Easy and Cranston Coils should be accepted. After determining marginal cost and revenue (see Appendix 5: Sleep Easy Contract Costs at Connecticut Plant), the contract should be accepted. Problem Definition The short-run cost structure of the new Cranston Coils facility in Connecticut needs to be determined in order to predict the cash flow of the new plant. Once the cost structure is defined, the cost function can be used to evaluate whether or not certain contracts should be accepted, such as the Sleep Easy Company’s proposed contract of fifty units at $70.00 per unit. Identification of Possible Solutions The short-run cost equations of Cranston Coils indicate that the cost structure varies between the plants because of the significant discrepancy between the marginal costs of each plant. One possible solution would be to reevaluate each plant’s marginal product of labor and marginal...
Words: 1753 - Pages: 8
...Assignment Template for Group Assignments Subject Code: ACCT90004 Subject Name: Accounting for Decision Making Student Name Liwen Mu Jingzi Liu Yingying Sun Assignment Name or Number: Group Assignment Student ID Number 1. 2. 3. 610791 588728 574519 Table of ratios Financial Ratio Quick Ratio Current Ratio LT Debt to Equity Total Debt to Equity Interest Coverage Receivable Turnover Inventory Turnover Asset Turnover Dividend Yield Gross Margin Net Profit Margin Return on Assets Return on Equity formula current asset − inventory current liability current asset current liability long term debt shareholder′ s equity total liability shareholder’s equity EBIT1 interest expense (net financial cost) net sales2 average net account receivable Cost of goods sold net sales average total assets dividends per share4 market price per share gross profit net sale EBIT (before significant items) net sales net profit5 Average assets net profit6 Average shareholder’s equity Average inventory3 Industry Ratio 0.33 0.46 18.82% 27.81% 23.18 5.97 1.38 0.22 1.32% 40.93% 9.69% 1.47% 2.61% CRS Ratio 2011 1.12 1.77 39.34% 72.95% 3.72 5.95 3.36 0.63 4.36% 30.86% 11.07% 2.96% 5.82% CRS Ratio 2010 0.94 1.56 72.53% 113.1% 3.60 8.32 6.15 0.93 5.12% 21.74% 9.70% 4.30% 10.67% 1 2 The EBIT we use is 212 million, excluding significant items. The net sale in 2010 includes the sales generated from operations which are discontinued in 2011. 3 Both the current and non- current inventory are inclusive. 4 Dividend per...
Words: 2186 - Pages: 9
