Free Essay

Lsi Conflict Paper

In: Business and Management

Submitted By srlaubenstein76
Words 2119
Pages 9
The specific qualities one has in his or her life are very crucial in how we conduct our business, shape our interactions with other people and essentially form our lifestyle. By gaining a better understanding on how we constructively deal with conflict as individuals, we can identify and understand how our approach will influence our behavior by helping us combat our weaknesses and capitalize on our strengths. The life styles inventory tool is a survey of questions geared toward helping individuals gain an insight into our own personality and self-development along with the type of behaviors we exert to others as well. It helps us to look at the positive and negative qualities of our personalities and ways to build on them and improve upon them.
I set the bar pretty high in managing to dominate with high scores in all of the "constructive" conflict orientation styles including Pragmatist, Self-Empowered, Conciliator and Relationship builder. All scores for these particular categories ranked between 90 and 93 percentiles. Individuals exhibiting these styles deal with conflict effectively; they see conflict situations as opportunities for personal growth, treat opponents as respected equals, and tend to have a goal beyond winning or losing which enables them to benefit regardless of the conflict's outcome. I have always been complimented on my ability to build and sustain meaningful and satisfying relationships. I scored on the high range and according to the survey results I tend to be most effective and comfortable in the company of others. I will generally strive to improve and maintain those relationships that are important to me. I value teamwork, cooperation and mutually rewarding relationships. I express my liking for a people, and because I am tactful and considerate of others' feelings, they tend to like me in return. This characteristic has worked in my favor throughout my career and personal life.
It brings me to a time that based on my solid relationship building skills I have endured, my connections have grown and increased as well. These relationships have become a solid reward of business networking to my advantage. This philosophy applies to people looking for a job. When I was in the job search process, I discovered an interesting statistic: Almost 90% of people look for jobs only by looking at ads, but that’s where only 10% of available jobs exist. At least 30% come from referrals. The more you focus on your network and relationships, the better connected to opportunities you’ll be. What I was getting at with my example here is that with each job I have been a part of, I was always one of the 30% statistics. To elaborate on that factor, the business I am now working for enables me through my strength of relationship building an extremely effective way to promote our work and generate more business as a whole.
When looking at it on paper, it appears that I am right where I should be with my constructive orientation style. After all, constructive is a positive thought toward conflict, right? Let's break it down and look at a bigger picture. Regardless, of my high assessment in this area, I still have things that I need to discover and can potentially learn from in this area. Being too pragmatic, means I am not willing to try something because I don’t know if it’s going to work and feel that we only have one shot to get it right. The conciliator, not the parties, often develops and proposes the terms of settlement. By being very self-empowered, I may tend to think I know what is best for me and others involved, when I may need to be more open-minded to several options available. Conciliation is used almost preventively, as soon as a dispute or misunderstanding surfaces: a conciliator pushes to stop a substantial conflict from developing. I also have a big disadvantage in relationships because I trust way too easily….resulting in me ending up getting "burned" in several occasions.
Transitioning to the complete opposite of the spectrum, we can analyze my weaker styles of conflict orientation to be the "aggressive/defensive" behavior. I ranged from Escalator--10th percentile, Dominator--25th percentile, and Perfectionist--44th percentile. I think I was the most surprised by the Perfectionist not falling into the 90's or higher! By nature, I have always been viewed and labeled by this trait. I have always been goal oriented and pushed by my goals in fear of not reaching them. I never settle with good, I want the best. I am very hard on myself and critical at the same time. I tend to hone in on these imperfections and have trouble seeing anything else at times. I have a very obsessive-compulsive behavior stemming from this that leads to over inundated stress and anxiety. So, I am not the dominating type….and I really do not prefer to escalate a situation, sounding again like a pretty positive outcome, or is it?
Considering that I am possibly a doormat, doesn't sound too appealing either. Ideally, you should not be aggressive to enhance your own self at the expense of others. However, being assertive and expressing your feeling, opinions and needs directly, openly and honestly without violating the personal rights of others is the way to go. I need to strive for a fine line and be more assertive. Saying no in the right way will enable me to kick the "doormat" status.
This leads to the situation I encountered at work recently. The day started off with me answering the phone to a customer that decided she wanted to bind homeowner's insurance with us based on the quote we provided her the week before. I was unable to locate the quote, and unfortunately not able to process a new one based on my status of not being "licensed" to do so. The quote was initially processed by a former employee that was no longer with us. I wanted to make sure we provided exceptional service to the customer and advised I would need to call her back as soon as I retrieved the quote for her so that we could properly review it together. In the mean time, I had another team member process the quote. It came back $100 more. I returned the call explaining the situation and why we had different premiums in the quoting process. After listening to her go from frustrated to mad to understanding in a 45 minute call, I was able to compromise and come to an agreement. She provided credit card information and was ready to complete her application and bind the insurance. So, you are thinking great…situation resolved! Not so fast, again since I am not a licensed team member, I am unable to process the finalization of any binding of applications as well. I forwarded all essential information to the team member that just gave me the new quote. Within 5 minutes, the situation completely did a 360. The team member realized she didn't quote it correctly and made a mistake. This was a $200 mistake that would cause the premium to increase again. She gave me the documents and advised I needed to call back the customer and advise of the situation. At that point I realized I had been the easy way out and also the doormat so to speak. My lack of dominance and assertiveness were working against me here. I was the one delivering all the bad news. I clearly spoke up to the manager and team member and advised at this point, due to the disadvantage of the mistakes that were made throughout the quoting process, it would need to be one of them that returned the call and explained the outcome. They needed to be held accountable for their actions and I need to learn to say no when reasonable.
I tend to fair midline on the remaining styles with three falling in the 50th percentile including the majority of the "passive/defensive" characteristics such as Regulator, Insulator and Avoider. In addition, Competitor falls at 65th percentile and finally, Accommodator, scoring a little higher at 85th percentile. To summarize my place here I try to maintain a sense of harmony and try to smooth over differences. However, this puts me at a disadvantage as I start trending toward the destructive direction since it denies me the opportunity to contribute my own views and gain genuine acceptance. I am accommodating myself at the approval of others. I strive to be somewhat of a competitor and I believe this comes from the perfectionist aspect working together. Not that I intend to lose sight of pursuing a mutual agreement, I just tend to focus on that motivation of personal gain and success so much I lose site of the main goal at hand.
My strengths within my conflict style are manifested in both my professional and personal lives. I continually strive to grow and always look for new ways to challenge myself. I know myself very well and take pride in that. I value knowing myself and have a very good handle on my self-worth. As a self-empowered person, I tend take ownership and responsibility. I see a crisis as a challenge and an opportunity in searching for solutions. This is the style that I feel describes me the most. It has allowed me to adapt too many situations. Even in conflict or disagreement, it has proven to be my biggest asset in the end.
To better improve on my weaknesses, I will now continue to initiate several ways of developing a willingness and ability to engage in self-reflection. Since this is definitely a critical leadership skill that is not easily learned yet which reaps many rewards. In this way I can motivate myself to work harder and set greater goals to achieve. To become more self – actualized I need to accept others with fewer conditions, restructure unpleasant tasks to make them more enjoyable, make it a point to do the things I enjoy regularly, see problems as opportunities for growth and development, live each day in the present and know myself. Moving forward….the benefits I will gain when I am more self - actualized is greater professional success, enhanced creativity and ability to be innovative, stronger acceptance of myself and others, improved perspective and judgment, while being able to enjoy the ability to relax and enjoy myself.
I believe my personality is something that I have had since childhood. I was raised to hold those values to do my best always. I most likely developed all my life styles by the environment that I grew up in. My parents continually motivated me to be the best and work hard in everything. Growing in that environment, it became habit to set goals, work towards these goals and produce high quality results, demonstrating that hard work will pay off.
This survey highlighted both my strengths and weaknesses. It was very helpful to analyze myself as a manager and a leader. There were a lot of characteristic properties that were brought to my attention. The inventory also confirmed many traits that I realized but have not been attentive to find ways to build upon. With the help of this survey, I have been made aware of what I will work on, build on and improve upon to become a successful manger and a leader. As mentioned earlier, I was surprised with my perfectionism scoring lower than I had imagined but overall, I believe the LSI results are accurate. Not only this assignment but the course itself has motivated me to utilize my traits to develop my career, relationships, personal and professional life, while continuing to evaluate and direct myself on the right track to continued success.

Please utilize the chart and graph below to understand the conflict styles that best describes my personality:

| | | | | Position | Style | Score | Percentile | Range | 11 | Pragmatist | 38 | 90 | HIGH | 12 | Self-Empowered | 37 | 93 | HIGH | 1 | Conciliator | 37 | 90 | HIGH | 2 | Relationship Builder | 38 | 93 | HIGH | 3 | Accommodator | 21 | 85 | HIGH | 4 | Regulator | 15 | 57 | MEDIUM | 5 | Insulator | 16 | 57 | MEDIUM | 6 | Avoider | 5 | 50 | MEDIUM | 7 | Escalator | 2 | 10 | LOW | 8 | Dominator | 3 | 25 | MEDIUM | 9 | Competitor | 15 | 65 | MEDIUM | 10 | Perfectionist | 19 | 44 | MEDIUM | | | | | |

Works Cited:
Class Lecture - Weeks 1 & 2

Folger, J.P., M.S. Poole, & Randall K. Stutman. Working Through Conflict: Strategies for Relationships, Groups, and Organizations, (6th Edition). Pearson, Allyn and Bacon: 2009.

Wilmot, W.W. & Joyce L. Hocker. Interpersonal Conflict, (8th Edition). McGraw-Hill: 2011.

http://www.survey-server2.com/lsiconflictuniversity-sso/part_menu.asp

http://www.epaperflip.com/aglaia/viewer.aspx?docid=56ca406928b7448ca0bdff018b904418

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Life Styles Inventory

...Life Styles Inventory: Self-Description GM591: Leadership and Organizational Behavior Instructor: Christine Rainwater Ada Freeman afreex4@yahoo.com March 11, 2010 Abstract This paper explains the current way I think and behave using the results of the Life Styles Inventory (LSI) as defined by Human Synergistics International’s LSI Circumplex. The resource maintains that there are three major “life styles” traits. The first is the constructive styles which depict synergy and helps validate why certain individuals, groups, and organizations are particularly effective in performance, growth, and work quality. The second is the passive/defensive style which can produce a predictable and secure situation, however, learning, the ability to adapt and the organization’s survival is hampered. The third is the aggressive/defensive which may lead to stress, decisions are often based on status as opposed to experience and conflict instead of a team effort. Keywords: life styles inventory (LSI), constructive, passive/defensive, aggressive/defensive   As I reviewed the LSI Styles Circumplex after the Life Styles Inventory, I could immediately see that some of my results for the behaviors were right on the mark. Others I felt were a bit off the chart but no results seem completely off the chart. After reviewing how the scores were calculated, I began to understand some of the inter-relations between the styles and my corresponding behaviors and beliefs. My...

Words: 1244 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Lsi Paper

...difficult to measure or evaluate it. Many people may be able to describe their strengths, but they do not like to talk about their weaknesses. On the other hand, people who can objectively identify their strengths and weaknesses. But in the same time they found difficulties to recognize how they can enhance their strengths and how they can overcome their weaknesses. Therefore, Human Synergistic In. developed computer software called life style inventory, which will be referred as LSI. The LSI software helps users to assess their behavior, not only that, it work with them to improve strengths and reduce the effect of weaknesses. LSI is tremendously helpful software especially when you come to the working behavior, which requires interacting, dealing and working with people who are different from you. In the rest of this paper I will try articulate my life behavior base on LSI test. I found that my primary behavior is “competitive” and my backup is “approval”. First of all, I want acknowledge that LSI test somewhat touches my primary behavior which is “competitive”. I believe being competitive thinking person helped me grew up rapidly in my career. Competitive thinking style encourage me to increase my knowledge, in order to compete with other who some time been my colleagues or coworkers. This type of thinking helps me to...

Words: 1342 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Lsi Self - Description

...LSI SELF-DESCRIPTION Merissa A. Hanley ladyezz32@gmail.com MGMT-591-20133 Leadership & Organizational Behavior Professor Ifeanyi Ugboaja September 14, 2013 According to the LSI Internet LS1 1, the Life Style Inventory survey from Human Synergistics International is a “system that provides a "road map" to properly focus your personal development goals and keep you focus in the right direction. The LSI Internet LS1 measures 12 essential styles of patterns of thinking that can either aid or deter a person from achieving his/her capabilities. The 12 LSI styles are divided into three major clusters. The Constructive Styles which refers to one’s satisfaction needs includes Achievement, Self-Actualizing, Humanistic-Encouraging, and Affiliative. The Passive/Defensive Styles which refer to People Orientation behaviors which includes Avoidance, Dependent, Conventional and Approval. The last cluster is Aggressive/Defensive Styles which refers to Task Orientation behaviors, which includes Oppositional, Power, Competitive, and Perfectionistic. This paper will identify and discuss my primary & backup thinking styles, identify my limiting style that I believe may be working against me, one specific style that I would like to change and the difference it will make in my personal and professional life. My primary style (highest percentile score) is under the Constructive section which is Achievement. My “backup” (second highest percentile) is Affliative style...

Words: 1540 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Lsi Paper

...LSI Results(circumplex and chart) Your LSI Styles Profile The raw and percentile scores in the table below and the extensions on the circumplex shown below depict your perceptions of how you think and behave. The CONSTRUCTIVE Styles (11, 12, 1, and 2 o'clock positions) reflect self-enhancing thinking and behavior that contribute to one's level of satisfaction, ability to develop healthy relationships and work effectively with people, and proficiency at accomplishing tasks. The PASSIVE/DEFENSIVE Styles (3, 4, 5, and 6 o'clock positions) represent self-protecting thinking and behavior that promote the fulfillment of security needs through interaction with people. The AGGRESSIVE/DEFENSIVE Styles (7, 8, 9, and 10 o'clock positions) describe self-promoting thinking and behavior used to maintain status/position and fulfill security needs through task-related activities. Position | Style | Score | Percentile | 1 | Humanistic-Encouraging | 35 | 80 | 2 | Affiliative | 35 | 75 | 3 | Approval | 19 | 80 | 4 | Conventional | 22 | 90 | 5 | Dependent | 17 | 63 | 6 | Avoidance | 10 | 75 | 7 | Oppositional | 3 | 18 | 8 | Power | 4 | 34 | 9 | Competitive | 10 | 34 | 10 | Perfectionistic | 12 | 9 | 11 | Achievement | 36 | 80 | 12 | Self-Actualizing | 34 | 80 | The raw scores potentially range from 0 to 40. The percentile scores represent your results compared to those of 9,207 individuals who previously completed the Life Styles Inventory. For example, a percentile...

Words: 1565 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Devry

...The Life Styles Inventory (LSI) Paper MGMT 591 Leadership and Organizational Behavior Instructor: Barbara Vallera 5/21/14   Introduction The Life Styles Inventory™ (LSI) presents a cycle of questions in the areas of personal fulfillment, tension, usefulness and value of interpersonal relationships and then collates participant responses into a circumflex identifying twelve exact patterns or styles of thinking, behaving and interacting on a personal, management and leadership level representing the essence of an individual's usefulness. The circumflex provides an image of an individual's thinking and behavior and then compares results with those of other individuals having taken the inventory in order to create self-awareness of strengths and weakness in order to create awareness of constructive behavior. The forming base for the LSI represents nearly ten thousand individuals from various organizations, ages, levels of education and from both genders. The results plotted on the circumflex a divided into area defined by higher order and lower order needs of satisfaction and security; and task-centered and people centered orientations. Within these spheres are twelve separate styles (agreement, conservative, reliant, prevention, oppositional, power, aggressive, obsessive, success, self-actualizing, humanistic-encouraging, and affinitive) which are consequently grouped into three exact patterns (success and reliant; self-actualizing and avoidance; humanistic-encouraging/oppositional;...

Words: 1709 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Lifestyles Inventory Lsi Paper

...The Life Styles Inventory™ (LSI) Paper MGMT 591 Leadership and Organizational Behavior   Introduction The Life Styles Inventory™ (LSI) presents a series of questions in the areas of personal satisfaction, stress, effectiveness and quality of interpersonal relationships and then collates participant responses into a circumplex identifying 12 specific patterns or styles of thinking, behaving and interacting on a personal, management and leadership level--representing the essence of an individual's effectiveness. The circumplex provides a visual description of an individual's thinking and behaviour and then compares results with those of other individuals having taken the inventory in order to create self-awareness of strengths and weakness in order to create awareness of constructive behaviour. The norming base for the LSI represents nearly 10,000 individuals from various organizations, ages, levels of education and from both genders. The results plotted on the circumplex a divided into areas defined by higher order and lower order needs of satisfaction and security; and task-centered and people-centered orientations. Within these spheres are 12 separate styles (approval, conventional, dependent, avoidance, oppositional, power, competitive, perfectionistic, achievement, self-actualizing, humanistic-encouraging, and affiliative) which are subsequently grouped into three specific patterns (achievement/dependent; self-actualizing/avoidance; humanistic-encouraging/oppositional;...

Words: 1602 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Lsi Results Assignment

...D03454209 | LSI Style Interpretation | Leadership and Organizational Behavior | GM5910N_HProfessor Kenneth Goldsmith | Robert Neal White | 8/31/2011 | | After finishing the LSI Style Interpretation for this class I was identified as have the humanistic- encouraging style as my top style with a score of 38 which placed me in the top 93 percent of persons who took the interpretation. My second top style was the affiliative style in which I scored 37 and placed in the top 90 percent of persons who took the interpretation. After contemplating my work / leadership style(s) and comparing how I interact with co- workers and subordinates, I agree with the results and will further discuss my reasoning in this paper. First, I will discuss the humanistic- encouraging style. As depicted on the description of the humanistic- encouraging style, scoring high on the humanistic – encouraging scale is “positive, healthy and effective”. (International, 2011) The high score shows that I am “sensitive to people’s needs, and will devote energy to counseling and coaching others”. (International, 2011) The scale itself measures the takers interest in people and the tendency to care about others. It also measures the takers ability to encourage others to improve. As stated on the description, since I scored as high as I did I should “ have an unconditional positive regard for others”. (International, 2011). I completely agree with the results of the survey and am confident...

Words: 1552 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Lsi Mbti Comparison

...asked: “What is the difference between the Life Styles Inventory™ and the MyersBriggs Type Indicator®?” Whereas both of these surveys help individuals to better understand themselves and others, they differ in terms of what they measure, how they measure it, and how the results are used. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to highlight what we believe are some of the most important differences between these two popular instruments. The Life Styles Inventory™ (LSI) measures twelve distinct thinking and behavioral styles that are distinguished by their orientations toward task versus people and higher-order needs for satisfaction and growth versus lower order needs for security and safety. The LSI builds on the work of a variety of noteworthy psychologists, including Abraham Maslow, Carl Rogers, Albert Ellis, Karen Horney, Timothy Leary, David McClelland, Harry Stack Sullivan, as well as management scholars, such as Fredrick Hertzberg, Douglas McGregor, and Ralph Stodgill. It is designed to provide individuals with an opportunity to identify specific strengths in their thinking and behavior, as well as any “stumbling blocks” that may be standing in their way. As such, the LSI is used to initiate positive changes in how people approach their work and interact with others— changes that can increase both their personal and professional effectiveness. In contrast, the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator® (MBTI®) measures preferences rather than thinking styles. More specifically, it is a system...

Words: 3222 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

Me Myself and I

...My Self Improvement Survey Personal Thinking Styles After taking the LSI (Life Styles Inventory) survey, I noticed certain things about my personality and my thinking styles. Certain styles rated higher than others, but there were a few that stayed constant. The two longest style extensions have the greatest influence on my behavior, and are called your primary and backup styles. Going through these styles in particular, I noticed my primary style is approval and my backup style is conventional style. In the LSI index, “The Approval scale measures our need to be accepted by others to increase or sustain our feelings of self-worth. While the desire to be approved of is natural, problems occur when approval-seeking becomes a need, and ultimately our standard way of interacting with others.” This means I need people to approve my lifestyle. I try so hard for people to impress people with my personality and character, but sometimes it’s not enough. This style is categorized as having low self-esteem, an over concern with wanting to be liked as well as complications with conflict and confrontation. In this case, I am the type of person who tries very hard to be liked by others. Sometimes it can backfire because I show a persona of myself to people where I will act like someone I am not so that they accept me. In this world we live in, it’s a dog eat dog world where people don’t care about your feelings. They will do anything to get to the top of ladder. Personally, I am the type...

Words: 1204 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Lsi Conflict

...LSI Conflict Analysis Everyone has their own tendency when it comes to acting and reacting towards conflict. One person may be more aggressive and push conflict onto others, while another may be hesitant and unsure of how to handle conflict, so they simply to try to avoid it at all cost. The LSI Conflict Profile and Circumplex will give a detailed analysis of a person’s own personal conflict style, and will make them aware of their strengths and weaknesses. It can be used to allow oneself to evaluate their own attitude toward conflict, and if changes can be made to improve their outlook and approach to handling that conflict. My top 3 highest personal conflict styles are: pragmatist (99th percentile), avoider (94th percentile), and insulator (87th percentile). My 3 lowest personal styles are: dominator (10th percentile), conciliator (38th percentile), and self-empowered (42nd percentile). (See Circumplex and Conflict Profile at end of paper.) A pragmatist is someone who is practical, and sees things for how they really are. They are sensible, and don’t rush to make judgments or decisions. I am definitely a pragmatist. I am surprised that I was in the 99th percentile for this style, as I didn’t realize my way of thinking was so extreme to one style. When I have to make a decision I think of every possible variation of the decision, and what each variation could lead to. When it comes to conflict this means that I don’t make decisions in the heat of the moment and I’m able...

Words: 2173 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Lsi Interpretation

...LSI Style Interpretations Sena Vanessa vanessasenasuh@gmail.com MGMT-591 Leadership & Organizational Behavior Professor Kane 07/20/2014 Personal Thinking Styles My first primary style of thinking is oppositional. I often resists change and “lock” myself in my comfort zone instead of taking change as a challenge. I am also very critical of others, especially my workmates. I feel very offended when I see them not working as hard as I do. The second one is power. I tend to control everything. Most of the time I do not believe in force. I also have little confidence in people. In my current working environment, I always feel like my current work peers are not capable and majority of the errors are due to their mistakes. The third one is competitiveness. I am a very competitive person. I have strong needs to win and to be one step ahead from my peers. At work, I often see team project as a competition to shine amongst others. These three results show that I have an aggressive and defensive style. They described my logic and behavior that I use to maintain my status and to fulfill my security needs through task related activities. The fourth one is conventional. I follow the rules very strictly. I am very rigid, not even opposing ideas. At my current position at work, I have to deal with customers and sometimes they put me in the situation to cross my company’s policies to please them. Yet, I cannot and end up disappointing them. Even from my manager’s view, I am reliable...

Words: 782 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Lsi Assignment Mgmt591

...Personal Thinking Style Primary Thinking Style Overall my LSI Style Circumplex interpret my life style in all different thinking styles but considering raw score to establish primary thinking style that will be Affiliative and self-actualizing styles, which will be listed under constructive style. This style reflects self-enhancing thinking and behavior which defines a person’s level of satisfaction. Constructive style also shows the abilities to grow healthy relationships and efficiently working with people and being proficient in finishing tasks. Affiliative style of thinking states the capabilities of friendliness, cooperativeness, supportiveness and ease with people. This style is also be liked by others where they find this approach sincere. The style is diplomatic in nature and requires tact full thinking in dealing with difficult situations and with people. Self-Actualizing styles demonstrate good leadership qualities, respected well-thought-of, optimistic and realistic, likes responsibilities and mostly confident with task. They are very aware of own feelings, very creative and original thinkers. A person with this style generally respected by people and implements very balanced approach in taking decisions. This primary thinking style is reflected to my own feelings where I always wanted to cooperate with people and to help them achieving their task regardless of my own benefits. Affiliative thinking style always helped me maintaining good relationship with people;...

Words: 1993 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Multitech Assignment

...0012 Senior Government Managers and Officials Senior government managers and officials plan, organize, direct, control and evaluate, through middle managers, the major activities of municipal or regional governments or of provincial, territorial or federal departments, boards, agencies or commissions. They establish the direction to be taken by these organizations in accordance with legislation and policies made by elected representatives or legislative bodies. Example Titles assistant deputy minister chairperson, Human Rights Commission chief administrative officer – regional municipality chief statistician – government services city administrator deputy minister director general – government services executive director – government services high commissioner View all titles Main duties Senior government managers and officials perform some or all of the following duties: * Establish objectives for the organization in accordance with government legislation and policy, formulate or approve and evaluate programs and procedures alone or in conjunction with senior government committees * Advise elected representatives on policy questions and refer any major policy matters to these representatives for final decision * Recommend, review, evaluate and approve documents, briefs and reports submitted by middle managers and senior staff members * Ensure appropriate systems and procedures are developed and implemented to provide budgetary control *...

Words: 11296 - Pages: 46

Premium Essay

Lsi Paper

...Personal Thinking Styles: The Life Style Inventory assignment gave me a chance to see on paper how my thinking styles influence my ability to deal with most situations. The Life Style Survey guides individuals to gain insight into their own self development and personality along with the type of behaviors we exercise to others as well. By completing the survey, I have a better understanding on how I can constructively deal with conflicts as an individual. Furthermore, the survey helps us take a look on the positive and negative qualities of our own personalities and different ways we build and improve upon them. According to my LSI results, my primary style was a tie between humanistic-encouraging and self-actualizing which falls under the Constructive Styles. Constructive Style reflects a healthy balance of people and task-related concerns and promotes the fulfillment of higher order needs (Our Measurement Model - The Circumplex, 2010). Humanistic-Encouraging is at the one o’clock position. It reveals the growth and development of people, a high positive regard for them and sensitive to their needs (Our Measurement Model - The Circumplex, 2010). This type of style describes me so well because I am willing to help others, encourage others, and understanding. When I look at my personal and professional life, this is exactly how I view myself. My family and friends have describes me as a leader who is thoughtful and considerate of everyone. I tend to agree with them...

Words: 2077 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Life Styles Inventory Paper

...Life Styles Inventory Paper DeVry College of New York Leadership & Organizational Behavior Abstract This paper contains detailed analysis of my primary, back up and limiting thinking styles depicted from Life Styles Inventory survey results and how I manifest these thinking styles in my personal and professional life is in the first part. This paper also contains the impact of my personal style on management style, assess the impact on my effectiveness as a manager in terms of the four functions of management in the second part. Genesis of personal style, how I developed these styles as revealed by the Life Style Inventory survey is included in the third part. The paper will conclude with summary containing on how I value this exercise for my academic, personal and professional growth. Life Styles Inventory Part I: Personal Thinking Styles (Primary, Back-up, and Limiting) From the Life styles Inventory (LSI) survey, my primary thinking style is “Conventional” which showed a score of 91th percentile and my back-up style is “Self-Actualization” which showed a score of 90th percentile. I accept the survey results regarding my primary and back-up personal thinking styles. “Conventional” thinking style measures how the native adheres to rules, follows practices and principles. “Self-Actualization” thinking style represents the Self-respect, Self-realization, Receptive, Simplicity, emphasis equality, creativity, pursue of knowledge and desire to give for the society of...

Words: 2017 - Pages: 9