Premium Essay

M7D1

In:

Submitted By tbeers
Words 760
Pages 4
In professional cycling “blood doping” was reportedly performed by some of the athletes. Blood doping is the transfusion of one’s own blood back to oneself, when it is not needed. Thinking about the normal red blood cells, why would an individual do this procedure? What is the danger? Another method a cyclist might use is the administration of erythropoietin (EPO). Why would they use this as a medication?
Red blood cells are the essential carrier of oxygen in the blood stream. When there is an abundance of red blood cells in the body, there is an increase in the supply of oxygen that can be delivered to muscle cells and tissues. When this occurs, the muscles can perform at a higher rate of efficiency and deliver power and strength. Because blood can come from the athlete themselves or from another person, there is a risk factor. If an athlete uses his or her own blood, they must undergo a blood withdraw, resulting in a potential shortage of blood, thus causing anemia. In the event that the blood comes from a third-party, communicable diseases and incompatibility can occur. Erythropoietin (EPO) is used by athletes to increase red blood cell counts as well. Erythropoietin is a type of protein that stimulates the production of red blood cells. EPO is a protein hormone produced by the kidneys. After being released into the bloodstream it binds with receptors in the bone marrow, where it stimulates the production of red blood cells (erythrocytes). Using erythropoietin removes the health concerns that may come along with transfusing one’s own blood or another person’s blood. As with blood doping, adding EPO to the circulatory system can be dangerous. With blood doping, adding more red blood cells than the body needs can increase the viscosity of the blood. The most common risk is a blood clot that can lead to a heart attack, stroke, or sudden death in your sleep.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Hello

...M7D1: On the SOAP box 1. How would you characterize the interaction between the physician and the patient in the video? Would you consider this a good interaction? Why or why not? In my opinion, I believe the patient and physician (nurse) relationship was well established. The medical interview performed was very effective and efficient. She was able to gather information, develop and maintain a therapeutic relationship, and was able to communicate with him. The patient seemed to trust the practitioner and disclosed information that people withhold (smoking). The patient was able to be honest in letting her know he smoked and abused antibiotics (prescribed and quit taking them). The practitioner was very warm and inviting which may have led to the patient being more open and relaxed and not feeling anxious with the practitioner. Some people develop white-coat syndrome when they are around doctors, nurses, or any medical type person. White coat syndrome is when the blood pressure surges when measured in the doctor’s office. However, I do not think his high blood pressure was the cause of white coat syndrome. I believe his smoking is a contributing factor to that because he seemed relaxed during the medical interview. 2. Based on what you saw, what parts of SOAP note were not covered? Were any missing? I believe all aspects of SOAP were covered. She came in and followed protocol by asking questions and documenting all his past illnesses and health history...

Words: 1830 - Pages: 8