Free Essay

Majority Rule

In:

Submitted By curvyspine
Words 1348
Pages 6
What is majority rule?
Majority Rule is the control of the majority. It is also the control of an organization or institution according to the wishes or votes of the majority of its members.

Bahamian Society before the Establishment of Majority Rule 59 Novembers ago three men came together and form the Progressive Liberal Party (PLP). They were Henry Milton Taylor, William. W. Cartwright, Cyril St. John Stevenson. They began meeting regularly discussing the pros and cons. They invited 7 men to join them but only 6 accepted the invitation. Henry Taylor was the Chairman, William was the treasurer and Cyril became the secretary. The party progressed in Nassau and decided to include the outer islands. When sir. Lynden Piddling came home from law school he joined the PLP party and that was the beginning of the road to majority rule. Sir Lynden Pindling, Randol Fawkes, Auther Hanna, Sir. Milo Butler Sr, Clarence Bain, Samuel Isaacs, and many other women and men planned and strategized to free there people from colonize. At that time racial segregation was a way of life in The Bahamas. The ‘blacks’ were referred to as coloured people. They were schools were coloured children were not allowed to enter. They were places like hotels, shops, and restaurants were colour people were not allowed to dine. There were also churches where coloured people were not allowed to sit in the same pews as the whites. In January 1954 the PLP held its first public meeting. In 1956 there was the first election. The Bay Street Boys started to get scared that they were going to lose so they called the U.S.A policemen saying a Negro colonist party was trying to take over The Bahamas. A group of woman led by Jorgina Symonette and others fundraised to raise funds for the PLP. The PLP did not have enough funds to have fish fries, grocery baskets, free liquor and parties to try and bribe the people like the Bay Street Boys did. The PLP would pass around hats at meetings to try to raise funds but it was not enough. The Bay Street Boys gave out free money to the people for their votes. They would tear the money in half and give half before the election and the other after if they voted freely. On election eve the white candidate for Grand Bahama from the UBP paid the black candidate 1000 pounds to drop out. In the 1965 election 6 PLP candidates were elected. They were Sir. Lynden Pindling, Randol Fawkes, Samuel Isaacs, Sir. Milo Butler, Cyril Stevenson and Clarence Bain; they were called the magnificent six. In 1958 a dispute broke out over the carrying of visitors from the new Nassau airport at Windsor field. Tour companies had been formed by the Bay Street Boys edging out the Taxi drivers. On January 12 1958 there was a strike that broke that was very dramatic and successful. On November 1st 1957 the taxi cab union under the leadership of Sir, Clifford Darling and others blocked all traffic to and from Nassau’s international airport for hours while the commissioner officers looked on helplessly.

Struggle To achieve Majority Rule On January 13 1958, every hotel and business was closed down completely. The PLP led a boycott along Bay Street. The workers went on strike and cried out “Not a sweat until our demands are met”. On January 19, 1959 Doris Johnson had asked to address the House of Assembly and lead a group of woman to declare to vote. They were denied sir Stafford Sands by him saying “over his dead body’. On July 31 1961 the grant of the Woman’s Suffrage Movement was passed and women were able to vote. The PLP government began the dynamic thrust for educational change in The Bahamas by making secondary education available to all Bahamians in 1967. This was key to removing the scales of ignorance from eyes of a people through a massive commitment to educate. The late Sir Cecil Wallace Whitfield, one of the members of the first majority rule Cabinet, was given the task to improve and Bahamianize the educational system. Huge capital expenditures were made to multiply and upgrade primary and secondary schools, to institute technical education and train new Bahamian teachers. The government’s White Paper on Education provided for the implementation of broad parameter involving teachers, parents and students, and was supportive of the high ideals with the government advocated – self-help, equality, the dignity of labour and service responsibility and co-operation. The establishment of the PLP government also brought about a new outlook on economic development. The objective was directed towards opening up greater economic and social opportunities for the citizens of The Bahamas and for greater flexibility of the economy. One of the major battles to achieve this objective was making Freeport Grand Bahama, safe and desirable for all Bahamians. During the 1970s, the PLP government launched the “Social Revolution,” which included the introduction of the National Insurance Scheme, a system of social security, which is continuing with a massive low cost housing programme. The PLP government also moved to improve the delivery of health care by adding an extension to the Princess Margaret Hospital, upgrading and building new polyclinics throughout New Providence and the Family Islands. On April 27th 1965 was Black Tuesday. A crowd of PLP supporters lead by the PLP chairman marched from Windsor Park to Bay Street and assembled in the front of the House of Assembly. Inside the House the PLP members lead by Pindling strongly opposed the revision of the bounties draft order. He advocated a national registration of voters. Outside the House of Assembly the PLP supporters cried out “Amend, Amend “, “Shame and Scandal in The House”. Sir Lynden, then Leader of the Opposition, during the heated debate over the issue of boundaries but in a carefully orchestrated move got up and threw the Mace, the Speaker’s symbol of authority, out of the window of the House of Assembly. He declared “The authority of this Island belongs to the people “and threw the mace out of the window. “Yes, people outside and mace belongs outside to.” He shouted. After that Sir Milo Butler got up and threw the two hour glass that were used to time to speakers out of the window. The UPB watched surprisingly. Sir Lynden Pindling then led the crowd singing the song “We Shall Overcome”.

ACHIEVEING Majority Rule An election was then called on January 10th, 1967. This was because in the Bible in the book of Exodus the Lord said he will free the children of Egypt on the tenth day of the first month. January 10th, 1967 was neither an end nor even a beginning. Instead, it was an important milestone in a journey that was begun centuries ago when some anonymous slave struck a blow for freedom for the first time. We pause to pay homage to the personalities and players in this epic struggle. In a hard fought and competitive election in 1967, the PLP delivered the following 18 members to a 38-member House of Assembly. They were: Lynden Pindling, Preston Albury, Clarence Bain, Milo Butler, Clifford Darling, Elwood Donaldson, Arthur Foulkes, Carlton Francis, Arthur Hanna, Warren Levarity, Curtis MacMillan, Uriah McPhee, Maurice Moore, Edmund Moxey, Jimmy Shepherd, George Thompson, Jeffrey Thompson and Cecil Wallace Whitfield. Randol Fawkes who successfully ran as Labour in 1962 and 1967 with the support of the PLP threw his support behind the PLP and became a member of the first Majority Rule cabinet. He figured prominently in the movement toward Majority Rule. Successful Independent candidate Sir Alvin Braynen threw in his lot with the PLP and accepted the post of Speaker of the House. These two warriors for justice and freedom tipped the proverbial scale in favour of the PLP and the first Majority Rule cabinet was formed: This distinguished group consisted of Cecil Wallace-Whitfield, Milo Butler, Arthur Hanna, Clarence Bain, Jeffrey Thompson, Carlton Francis, Randol Fawkes, Warren Levarity, Curtis McMillan, Clement T. Maynard and Lynden Pindling.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Senate Filibusters

...which they represent, whereas the Senate, (equally represented with two members from each state) tends to represent needs of the entire individual state which they represent. The Senate is often referred to as being the "world's greatest deliberative body"; which in effect can result in stalemates. In this tradition, both Republican and Democratic majorities have used the filibuster, or its threat, to prevent Senate votes on carefully selected pieces of legislation or nominations. The use of filibuster legislation has become increasingly popular within the last twenty-years. Although the term ‘gridlock’ gets thrown around with a bad connotation I feel it’s somewhat necessary when debating significant issues. As Rawls stated throughout his article, “The filibuster is a perfect candidate for this line of questioning: So what?” The filibuster in the U.S. Senate protects the rights of Senators to debate and amend legislation, thus protecting the interests of the American people. The Founders intent for the Senate was to slow the legislative process in order to ‘ensure due deliberation and inquiry’ instead of simply falling to majority rule. I’d like to touch...

Words: 534 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Lppe

...policy-making in democratic countries does Arrow Theorem predict? ANSWER Problems with policy-making in democratic countries does Arrow Theorem predict:- A. The problem associated with the groups that each group should have equal numbers of members. B. In most of democracies people don’t have individual preferences. C. Democracies have simple majority rule. In a simple majority rule, the Minimal Decisive Number is 50%+1. D. In most Democracies simple majority rule result in never ending voting cycle. 2. Offer at least two ideas for how real-world democracies can deal with such problems. ANSWER A democratic decision--‐making system is a system that in every case can somehow combine individual preferences into a collective, social preference. Solution for problems mentioned in answer 1 according to arrow theorem can be:- A. Democracies should have a general formula that covers not only the majority rule but every rule that aggregates individual preferences into a collective preferences that means democracies with majority rule should also have minimal Decisive rule. For example :- countries may require 2/3 majority votes. B. Each group can have any numbers of members .They, in particular, do not need to have an equal number of members. C. People can have their individual preferences. 3. Economic regulation is frequently justified by a need to further “social” or “public interest.” For instance, article 40 of the Polish Energy Law states...

Words: 791 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Synergistic Decision Making

...Synergistic Decision Making Tariq Shah OM-176 Group and Organizational Dynamics PSY 452 Module Two Organizational Management Professor Fabian April 15, 2015 Synergistic Decision Making Working with people is not easy at times. Many people rather work independently of others. I believe most of the reason for the individual deciding to work independent of others, is because they do not want to rely on others for their success or failure. If they can do it alone, they feel more in control of the process and thus, do not have to deal with many of the variables that come with working in groups of people. In my journey I have certainly not mastered working with people; however, I do find that working in groups provides the best overall solution to any organization’s effectiveness. The synergistic decision making process, where rational and interpersonal aspects are used, provides an organization or group with the best possible outcomes. Last week during class, our professor divided us into small groups between three to four people. My group had four people in total. Our task was to use the Desert Survival simulation and decide whether we would as a team stay or leave the crash site. After we had determined that, we then were asked to decide as a group, what order to label the fifteen items which were salvaged from the crash site. The Desert Survival simulation was certainly more than just any exercise. It is a tool that forces each person in the group to interact one with...

Words: 1098 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

History

...Fall 2015). Article II – Purpose Section 1: The purpose of the Flautistas Association will be to inspire and enrich the community through music. Our mission is to promote music involvement, spread awareness and musical entertainment to the community, educate individuals and inspire and cultivate artistic excellence. Article III – Membership Requirements Section 1: Membership will be open to everyone regardless of race, color, sex, religion, national origin, age, disability, citizenship, political affiliation, veteran status, sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression. A. Members must be students, faculty or staff. B. The majority of active membership must be enrolled students of UTRGV. C. Only enrolled students at UTRGV can vote and/or hold office. D. Those who have paid set dues by 2/3 majority vote will be considered Active members. E. All others will be inactive members. F. Active members must participate in all the performances organized by the Flautistas Association. G. Active members must attend 90 percent of rehearsals and scheduled meetings by the officers. Absences will be excused if set meetings conflict with a member’s enrolled classes. H. Music majors whose primary instrument is flute are automatically required to be active members. I. A zero percent of participation in performances will result in automatic expulsion. J. Flautistas Association will make reasonable accommodations in coordination with Disability...

Words: 1414 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Black Tuesday

...one of the greatest events in the movement of Bahamian independence. The PLP (Progressive Liberal Party) was formed November 23rd 1953.The PLP consisted of Sir Lynden Pindling, the late Sir Milo Butler, Mr. Cyril Stevenson, Mr. Sammie Issacs, the late Clarence A. Bain, and the late Sir Randol Fawkes. The formation of the PLP was a first for The Bahamas because it introduced party politics. At this time the majority group in the House was the Bay Street Boys, who later formed the UBP (United Bahamian Party). As mentioned by Source B around the time October 1956 at that time, only a few men, those who owned land, could vote. In addition, a man could vote in as many placed as he owned land, every company that owned land could vote, no woman could vote, and 21 years was the qualifying age. The PLP sought to change this desperate state of affairs and the UBP fought them every inch of the way. Between 1959 and1961, the Women’s Suffrage Movement took up the cause of votes for women and in July 1961, the act of voting for women became law. This was a huge step toward majority rule. The 1962 general election was the first election were all Bahamians including women were allowed to vote. Surprisingly though the UBP won the election over the PLP. This was because workers were threatened to be fired if they voted PLP. Also the UBP said that they were improving the Bahamian economy that change now would frighten tourist and investors who were just coming back from the general strike...

Words: 1083 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Case 12.1

...of producing the goods plus a certain fee or rate. The fee or rate in this case is not a pertinent fact. The remainder of the power produced by Florabama is sold to third parties at market rates. The Articles of Incorporation of Florabama state the following in terms of governance and management of Florabama: • The Board of Florabama (the “Board”) comprises ten individuals: six individuals from Meyer and four individuals from Saban. • All strategic decisions regarding the operations of Florabama, such as establishing operating and capital budgets, determining the pricing of the power produced by Florabama and the appointment of the CEO of Florabama (the “CEO”) must be presented to the Board and are determined by a simple majority vote. • The CEO is responsible for ensuring that the day-to-day operations of Florabama are executed in a manner consistent with the operating plan approved by the Board. • The appointed CEO was the COO of Saban before the formation of Florabama and continues to be an employee of Saban after the formation of Florabama and the appointment to the CEO position of Florabama. The sale, transfer, or disposition of the ownership interest in Florabama by either Meyer or Saban...

Words: 590 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Report on Finance

...2)Second question asked about that whether the recreational centre provided to them by the employers to freshen up in case of tiring day,majority vote says almost always i.e 13 out of 19. 3)Third question asked about whether their family get the compensation in case of employees death by the employers. 18 employees replied with the answer almost always. 4)Fourth question was asked about whether the timing flexibility provided to them,the majority of 10 votes of employees says sometimes,5 says rarely and 3 of them says never. 5)Fifth question was asked about whether the measures are taken by the employers to reduce stress of employees, the majority vote says sometimes i.e 17 and 2 of them say everyonce in a while. 6)Sixth question was asked about whether the facilities are provided to employees for their wellbeing by your employers,majority vote i.e 11 says everyonce in a while and 8 of them says sometimes. 7)Seventh question was asked about whether any kind of health management programs are provided, majority vote of 14 says everyonce in a while and 5 of them says sometimes. 8)Eigth question was asked about whether the health risk appraisals are given or not, all of them says they never get such type of appraisals. 9)Ninth question was asked about whether the telephonic wellness services are practiced by your employers,the majority vote of 10 say never. 10)Last question was asked about whether weight management (like losing of weight)is practiced or not, 9 of the employees...

Words: 327 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Deloitte Case 12-1

...Sale, transfer, or disposition of ownership requires written consent of the other party in advance. Both parties are independent and willingly agreed upon the prior approval terms. The board is composed of 10 individuals that Meyer and Saban are able to appoint based on their ownership percentage (Meyer has 6 and Saban has 4). The board makes all strategic decisions and establishes operating and capital budgets. The board also determines the pricing of power produced and appoints the CEO. The CEO that was appointed was the COO of Saban and he will oversee the day to day operations of Florabama. Both Meyer and Saban bear equity price risk. Meyer Inc. also has operating risk since the decisions of the board are made by simple majority (Meyer owns the majority). Saban bears commodity price risk due to the cost-plus arrangement. Meyer and Saban are both variable interest holders. Saban has an equity interest in Florabama and it also has the cost-plus arrangement, both of which make Saban a variable interest holder. Meyer Inc. is a variable interest holder in Florabama due to the equity interest they hold. ASC 810-10-25-38 says that the reporting entity that consolidates a Variable Interest Entity (VIE) is called the primary beneficiary of the VIE. It also states that a reporting entity shall be deemed to have a controlling financial interest in a VIE if it has both of the following characteristics: 1. The power to direct the activities of a VIE that most...

Words: 396 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Racism

...that have different skin colour. Finally, the South Africa team of rugby won the champion and all the citizens celebrate together without racism. He solves the racist problem that overtakes the country for so many years. In a country, racism can be a very serious problem. It’s a shame to let people know that their country having a serious racist problem. Racism will make the country unbalance in many different view. From the view of safety, the country wouldn’t be safe because it may cause war between the citizen of different races or different skin colour. From the view of economy, the subordinate minority are not given the chance of working as the majority group been given. From the view of human right, the subordinate group may not have their human right in the society. They have been labeled by the majority group. From the movie I realize that we can use other ways that are more acceptable rather than the ways that can’t be accept. Things can be solve by something as same as such as rugby in this movie. The...

Words: 454 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Kirkpatrick Series

...unacceptable but, as you may note by your own reaction, it is an assumption that, to even challenge, is deemed racist and unacceptable - or at the very least uncomfortable. Said differently, if "I" get to define the converation on racism, you can be assured I will define it to my favor. That being said, who is tolerable in this example and who is being prevent from even engaging in a dialogue that may result in substantive change and viable solutions? Abdication of a position for the fear of being labelled is a monopoly on the debate which is, by design, established to give those in control of the language an advantage. I think with all things even today, majority rules. When one says something, it isnt heard as loudly when others collectively join hands and speak out about it. The pendulum will always swing to the majority vote and it took one brave man to speak out and really get america to open their eyes into the crime against human equality they were committing. In the south there still is some hatred for the minority of african americans, but its never got out of hand since that speech shook america and got us to wake up. Now we live in a world where men and women have equal opportunities and i...

Words: 795 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Should Direct Democracy Be More Widely Used in the Uk?

...of the public’s attitude on an issue raised in parliament. Many local citizens do not often communicate with their MP; occasionally it can be difficult for Parliament to come to a decision that accurately reflects public opinion. MPs have to make choices bases what they personally feel is right and is not always entirely what the public want. Referendums give a distinct result that reflects the public’s demands. This is better as the public are satisfied and there is little need for ‘guess-work’ by the government. An example is this year’s Scottish Referendum. The culmination of the referendum exhibited that the slight majority of the public did not want independence; therefore it demonstrated that no immediate action was needed on the independence issue. If the government had made the decision on behalf of the public and chose to be independent then the majority of the public would not have been satisfied with...

Words: 1278 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Art of Love

...The Art of Love, written by Ovid, was a set of three books, the first being a guide or rule book on how to “pick-up” women and the second book a rule book on how to keep the woman you have or “caught” satisfied and interested in you. The third and final book that he wrote was written for women on what to do to catch and keep a man, since he felt it was only fair for women to also be “armed” when it comes to picking- up men. The rules that Ovid describes in The Art of Love are similar to the rules that most people follow in the “cruising and catching” game because they are effective and produce results, although not all the rules described in Ovid’s book are still used, a great majority of them are and have not changed after so many years. My overall perception for Ovid’s poem would be that of surprise. I would describe it as surprising because the “moves” that were implemented thousands of years ago are still very accurate and being used today. What Ovid’s poem tells me is that the “game” between men and women has not changed even though men and women have. Although most of the rules that Ovid writes about are now common sense in the dating world, such as choosing the best place to meet women just as fishermen know the best places to cast their nets to catch fish, and are followed by everyone. Ovid’s poem must have been written by experiences that he had and by the experiences that yielded the best results. In order for him to write a poem that describes what goes on today...

Words: 760 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Philosophy

...Term paper - Besides summary, the discussion part should further involve a comparison of social thinkers. Read and discuss more original and/or secondary readings. Give your own views, and try to conduct a dialogue with the existing views. In this thesis, I will give a summary of the works by Alexis de Tocqueville and Karl Marx, a discussion on their ideas as well as a comparison of the two thinkers. Alexis de Tocqueville is an aristocrat thinker From France that provides the most famous and influential views on democracy. In his work “Democracy in America”, he regards America as a land of liberty and democracy due to reasons like mores, geographical and historical advantages, but also provides a foresight on the future of democracy in America, and the threats to democracy and possible dangers of democracy. He believes the puritans were the one that contributed the most to American democracy, since they were all middle-class men with no salient differences when they first settled down in America. Also, they brought religion and political liberty to Amercia. Marx and Tocqueville holds different views on human nature. For Marx, he reflected on what it means to be truly human. Since he thinks that all species-beings are communal beings, he disaprroves things like religion, wage-labour and other forms of alienation that bring us far away from our communal nature and we must overcome them. For tocqueville, he emphazied a lot on dignity and liberty and he thinks that we are all...

Words: 2277 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Democracy in America (from Tocqueville's Work)

...by “almost” everybody. However, the country also has habits and morals deeply integrated (brought about by the diverse immigration) and particularly powerful. Usually within a democracy, common opinion rules the world. Although, the Americans hold a very particular philosophical vision according to which, each individual, unique, judge things by himself. As a matter, everyone cannot put forward his own opinion about every subject because if it was the case, he would dedicate and lost most of his time to study and, seeing that everything couldn’t be detailed, would go for some approximation. That is why Tocqueville says that, for some special domain, such as religion for example, it is necessary for the human being to come to general ideas. The example quoted by Tocqueville is very forceful and makes us able to catch the consequences of the emanation of an individual thought on this point. Tocqueville clearly distinguishes the individuals from aristocratic society from the ones from democratic society. Thus, the first ones blindly follow the ideas and doctrine inculcated by a man considered as higher than the other. To the contrary, the second ones, being considered all equals, will rather tend to believe the principles adopted by the mass. In this second case, the majority make the society exists and Tocqueville...

Words: 798 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Foss vs. Harbottle Rule

...law that the majority of the members must not commit a fraud on minority but must act bona fide for the benefit of the company as a whole. Here, the topic that I am about to touch is the rule of Foss v. Harbottle in which there are some exceptions to this particular rule protect the minority. As for the beginning, Foss v. Harbottle was originally a case reported in 1843. The Victoria Park Company was established for the purpose of ‘laying out and maintaining an Ornamental Park within the Township of Rusholme, Charlton-upon Medlock and Moss Side, in the country of Lancaster’. The capital of the company was to be $500,000, divided into 5,000 shares of $100 each. It was to be controlled by five shareholders. The first directors were Thomas Harbottle, Joseph Adshead, Henry Byrom, John Westhead and Richard Bealey. It was provided that three directors should constitute a board and that the acts of three or more should be as effectual as if done by the five. To sum up the feature of the case, two shareholders in the company, Richard Foss and Edward Turton, brought an action against the company’s directors, on behalf of themselves and the other shareholders except the defendants. The defendants were the five directors, a shareholder, who was not a director, the company’s solicitor and its architect. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants had affected various fraudulent and illegal transactions which the property of the company had been misused. In respect of the base rule in corporate...

Words: 6231 - Pages: 25