Mancur Olson’s main argument is that small groups are more efficient when it comes to benefitting the common good compared to large groups. Within small groups opinions are heard and tend to be more productive due to close face-to-face interactions. A small amount of members are less likely to face the social pressures than that of larger groups who receive negative incentives. A large group of members may cause a low percentage of participation and thus tends to work better if they are “federal” meaning divided into smaller groups under one federation which forms a whole. Members of such groups support themselves on the idea of receiving the same benefits wether their participation is accounted for or not in a larger group. Although groups