Premium Essay

Mapp V. Ohio

In: Other Topics

Submitted By Cabresita
Words 1138
Pages 5
Carmen Cabresita
Mapp v. Ohio

Mapp v. Ohio
The Supreme Court case of Mapp v. Ohio was heard in 1961 and originated in the local courts of the State of Ohio. This case plays an important role currently in our court system because it focuses on the warrant, search and seizures, Exclusionary Rule, Due Process and the 4th Amendment. This has molded every aspect in which the police agencies and the government as to how they can retrieve any incriminating evidence from any potential offender in the United States thru our criminal justice system.
Mapp v. Ohio (Plaintiff) is unique because this case challenged the Constitution and the Bill of Rights at the Supreme Court level. This case also challenged a police department because it was also able to show that at times the police officers are not meeting the criteria of which a warrant must be served on an individual. The police officers in this case had served a questionable warrant to Ms. Mapp that should have been for another individual within the same residence. The officers were attempting to incriminate MS. Mapp with evidence not pertaining to her in hopes of holding someone liable. The person in question that they were investigating no longer lived at that residence. As it turned out the warrant that was served was a bogus one, which the court, while it was conducting the trial, was unable to obtain. Evidence presented during trial was a gun and pornographic material. There were three police officers who were part of this investigation in which they used said warrant to force their entry into Ms. Dollree Mapp's home in Cleveland May 23rd of 1957. Ms. Mapp rented the room to this individual who was suspected of bombing for another case.
The first time the case was heard at the state level, Ms. Dollree Mapp (the defendant) lost her case to the state Cleveland, Ohio. Do to the…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Mapp V. Ohio

...Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961) was a very important case and turning point in our nation's history. It changed our legal system by extending the evidence exclusionary rule that was originally decided in Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914). It also marked the final incorporation of the fourth amendment into the due process clause of the fourteenth. The exclusionary rule was created in Weeks which prevented the federal government from using evidence that is found during an illegal search without a warrant. Years later in Wolf v Colorado, 338 U.S. 25 (1949) the Supreme Court ruled that both state and local governments must obey the fourth amendment by getting a warrant before conducting a search. The court also said the exclusionary rule did not apply to the states allowing state prosecutors to use illegally seized evidence in trial. Mapp v. Ohio gave the Supreme Court the chance to overrule Wolf and apply the exclusionary rule to the states. Mapp v. Ohio was quite the interesting case. It started on May 23, 1957, when three Cleveland police officers arrived at Dolly Mapp's home regarding information suggesting that a person wanted for questioning in connection with a bombing was hiding in the house, and upon a large amount of paraphernalia in the home (Mapp v. Ohio). The officers demanded entrance but Ms. Mapp refused entrance to the home without a search warrant after telephoning her attorney (Mapp v. Ohio). They took surveillance of the house and arrived......

Words: 1696 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Mapp V. Ohio Synopsis

...Mapp v. Ohio Synopsis Who was involved? Dollree Mapp had numerous connections to the underground world of boxing and illegal gambling. She was married to and had previous relationships with boxers and promoters who were big in the Midwest at the time. Mapp was first brought to Law Enforcement’s attention by having a potential connection to a bombing suspect named Virgil Ogletree. The police had heard from an anonymous tip that Ogletree might be hiding out within Mapp’s home. The police soon showed up, knocked, and asked if they could search the house. Mapp being somewhat aware of her rights refused entry to the police. They returned in greater numbers, forcibly entered the home, conducted a search and found Ogletree who was eventually cleared of all charges. However, the police did come across what is noted as “obscene material” which Mapp claimed was found within a footlocker of a previous tenant. The material collected being betting slips, a pistol, and some pornography. Mapp was later cleared of the charges pertaining to the betting slips located in the house but was later asked to testify against members of the illegal betting operation. Mapp refused and was later charged with possession of “lewd and lascivious books, pictures, and photographs”. She was sentenced to 7 years and immediately filed an appeal. This is where the story of Mapp v. Ohio really begins. What was argued? Mapp’s appeal argued that her 4th, 5th, and 8th amendments rights were violated....

Words: 737 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Mapp V. Ohio

...Paul Honorat Title : Mapp V. Ohio Citation: 367 U.S. 643 Facts: Three Cleveland police officers arrived at the petitioner’s residence pursuant to information that a bombing suspect was hiding out there and that paraphernalia regarding the bombing was hidden there. The officers knocked and asked to enter, but the petitioner refused to admit them without a search warrant after speaking with her attorney. The officers left and returned approximately three hours later with what purported to be a search warrant. When the petitioner failed to answer the door, the officers forcibly entered the residence. The petitioner’s attorney arrived and was not permitted to see the petitioner or to enter the residence. The petitioner demanded to see the search warrant and when presented, she grabbed it and placed it in her shirt. Police struggled with the petitioner and eventually recovered the warrant. The petitioner was then placed under arrest for being belligerent and taken to her bedroom on the second floor of the residence. The officers then conducted a widespread search of the residence wherein obscene materials were found in a trunk in the basement. The petitioner was ultimately convicted of possessing these materials. Issues: Whether evidence discovered during a search and seizure conducted in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution shall be admissible in a State court? Judgment: On May 03, 1957, police officers in a Cleveland, Ohio suburb received......

Words: 605 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Unit V Case Study

...Unit V Case Study BCJ-2001 March 29, 2016 Introduction The exclusionary rule applies to evidence which has been confiscated in infringement of the U.S. Constitution. There have been many alterations to the exclusionary rule and its applications throughout the years. The exclusionary rule, in addition to three court cases, which have had a direct impact on the rule, will be examined in this case study. The court cases are Weeks v. United States (1914), Rochin v. California (1952), and Mapp. Ohio (1961). The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and how it operates is accordance to the exclusionary rule, will also be studied. Additionally, this case study will examine logical searches and how they may have pertained to the three court cases. Exclusionary Rule The exclusionary rule is an interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment by the Supreme Court, it is not part of the U.S. Constitution (Dempsey, 2013). When written, the Bill of Rights only applied to “agents of the federal government—not to those of local governments—the Court first applied the exclusionary rule only to federal courts and federal law enforcement officers.” (Dempsey, 2013, p.179) In court cases, the rule has progressed as an interpretation of the Fourth Amendment by the Supreme Court, which forbids any irrational search and seizure of a citizen. Illegally confiscated evidence cannot be utilized against a defendant in a court, as it violates the Fourth Amendment, thus, the evidence...

Words: 1934 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Exclusionary Rule

...Weeks v. United States (1914) Fremont Weeks was arrested and charged with using the U.S. mail to conduct an illegal lottery. The police searched Week’s home and turned over articles and papers to a U.S. marshal. The marshal and the police also searched Week’s bedroom and confiscated other documents and letters. Week’s home was searched without a valid search warrant. Weeks was convicted of a federal offense based on the incriminating evidence seized from his home. On appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, Week’s conviction was overturned. The Court held that evidence obtained by unreasonable search and seizure must be excluded in a federal criminal trial. The Court also held that the Fourth Amendment barred the use of evidence obtained through illegal search and seizure in a federal prosecution. With this ruling, the Court established the exclusionary rule. Mapp v. Ohio (1961) On May 23, 1957, three police officers went to the home of Dollree Mapp to search for a man, who was wanted in connection with a bombing at the home of Donald King. The police officers knocked on the door and demanded entry. Mapp telephoned her attorney, and the attorney advised Mapp to refuse the police from entering her home without a search warrant. Three hours later, the police arrived again and forced their way into Mapp’s home. As the police officers began to searched the home, Mapp demanded to see a search warrant. One of the officers held up a piece of paper purported to be a search...

Words: 669 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Super Max

...Title Author Author Affiliation Abstract During the 1960’s, police officers executed arrests and dealt with problems in a way that greatly differ from law enforcement of today. This time frame involved racial riots, women rights, civil rights and important court cases. Mapp v. Ohio was concluded in 1961, and concluded that the fourth amendment applied to state courts and not just federal. Women achieved major milestones in the 1960’s, and Civil Rights were one of the biggest topics of the times. In the criminal justice field, a law enforcement official is expected to conduct themselves in a professional manner on and off duty. Part I – Policing Research Police Trends and Issues during the 1960’s During the 1960’s, law enforcement was completely different from what it is today. Officers were taught to handle situations in a way that would be illegal and in some opinions, morally wrong. When there was a riot, regardless of what is motivating the crowd, law enforcement officials would use excessive force and various, unnecessary tactics. People today probably wonder what made police officials believe that this type of crowd control was an acceptable response to any type of situation. Unfortunately, police officers were taught this in the academies and honestly believed that what they were doing was right. Also during this era, the first female officers came into play for law enforcement. In conjunction to females being allowed to be become officers, the first black......

Words: 1704 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Constitutional Policing

...then I will conclude with whether or not these three cases shaped any standards of the constitutional searches and seizures in the United States. The first case that I will address is, Weeks v. United States. The issue presented in this case is the defendants belongings were taken out of his home by law enforcement officers without a warrant. The officers had broken into his home without the defendant their and removed books, papers, bonds, and so on. The defendant went before the court and petitioned them to have his property returned to him. In his petition he stated that according to sections 11 and 23 of the Missouri Constitution, and the 4th and 5th amendment were violated. The courts did order the return of the property that was not pertinent to the charges. The defendant did petition the court one more time before the trial for the rest of his property and that one was denied. In the end of this case the court unanimously ruled that the seizure of property from a private home without a warrant was indeed a violation of the Fourth Amendment. This was also the case that created the “exclusionary rule”. This means that any evidence that is gained in violation of the Fourth Amendment in not admissible in court at trial. The next case is Silverthorne Lumber Company, Inc., ET AL v. United States. This was a US Supreme court case where Silverthorne Lumber tried to avoid paying taxes. On February 25th 1919 Fredrick W. Silverthorne and his father were arrested in their......

Words: 1077 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay


...the Court held that the Fourth Amendment barred the use of evidence secured through a warrantless search. Weeks's conviction was reversed, and thus was born, “The Exclusionary Rule.” The Exclusionary Rule established in Weeks was constitutionally required only in federal court until Mapp v. Ohio. In Mapp, Cleveland police officers had gone to the home of Dollree Mapp to ask her questions regarding a recent bombing. The officers demanded entrance into her home. Mapp called her attorney and then refused to allow the officers in without a warrant. The officers became rough with Mapp, handcuffed her, and searched her home. They found allegedly obscene books, pictures, and photographs. Mapp was charged with violations of Obscenity laws, prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced to seven years in prison. The Ohio Supreme Court affirmed the conviction, but the U.S. Supreme Court overturned it. In Mapp, the Court held that, The Exclusionary Rule applied to state criminal proceedings through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Before the Mapp ruling, not all states excluded evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Since Mapp, a defendant's claim of unreasonable Search and Seizure has become a matter of course in most criminal prosecutions. The purpose of “The Exclusionary Rule” is to deter police misconduct in searches and seizures. The thought was, evidence gained illegally will be excluded in......

Words: 587 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Week Two

...September 17, 2013 Week v. United States What is the main issue or question involved in the case? Weeks v. United States was a Supreme Court case that the Court unanimously held that the warrantless seizure of items from a private residence constitutes a violation of the Fourth Amendment. On December 21, 1911 Mr. Weeks was arrested by police without a warrant, at the Union Station in K.C. Missouri, where he was employed by an express company. While he was detained other officers entered his residency without a warrant and took several possessions that were turned over to U.S Marshalls. Later that same day The U.S Marshalls returned and took additional evidence to try and convict Mr. Weeks also without a warrant. What precedent or laws did the court use in order to come to its ultimate conclusion? The case raised a question about the Fourth Amendment. What kind of protection does the 4th Amendment provide for U.S citizens? How can the evidence gained by an illegal search be used? What kind of penalty will be issued to officers who gain evidence through illegal search? Mr. Week’s lawyers argued the 4th Amendment will be meaningless unless it provides some real protection. To say that people are safe from unreasonable search and seizures have no value unless it is clear that evidence from such searches cannot be used in federal court. Federal officials should not be able to break the law in order to force the law. Drawing on the Boyd v. United States......

Words: 1331 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Warren vs Rehnquist Courts

... on the other hand, took a conservative approach in criminal justice (Pollak, 1979). The most significant case that the Warren Court decided with regard to civil liberties was Brown v Board of Education of Copeka, Kansas (1954). The court unanimously ruled that there is no place for the doctrine of separate but equal doctrine in the sphere of public education. The Warren Court demonstrated its value for liberalism and activism. The view of the Warren Court was that states are a hindrance in the enhancement of a just nation. In the sphere of criminal procedure and law enforcement, Chief Justice Earl Warren’s Court was associated with four chief cases: Terry v Ohio (1968), Miranda v Arizona (1966), Gideon v Wainwright (1963), and Mapp v Ohio (1961). These four cases establish the foundation for the application of the principle referred to as the ‘exclusionary rule’ and the major basis for Warren Court critics. The Warren Court established the doctrine of the exclusionary rule in the case of Mapp v Ohio by ruling that all evidence acquired through a seizure or search, contrary to the Fourth Amendment provisions, is not admissible in court. This decision raised controversy with regard to the exclusion of illegally acquired evidence across all levels of the United States court system. In Gideon v Wainwright (1963), the court dealt with the issue of right to counsel for non-capital and capital cases. The court was to determine whether states need to appoint lawyers for......

Words: 2153 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

The Exclusionary Rule the defendant purposely violating constitutional boundaries? This essay will discuss how the exclusionary rule came about, the foundations of the rule, then will give a basic break down of the rule with some scenarios and then will give an opinion of the exclusionary rule. Development of the Exclusionary Rule As a solution for Fourth Amendment violations, the exclusionary rule first appeared in the courts with the case of Boyd v. United States [5], which the courts equated a binding production of business papers to a search and seizure result. Since the illegally searched citizen had been forced to incriminate himself by bringing the paperwork forward, the Supreme Court went further in their decision and added the Fifth Amendment’s self-incrimination statement to the Fourth Amendment’s protection rights. [6] A few years later the rule was abandoned by the court because the Supreme Justices were maintaining the common law rule that evidence was allowed no matter how it was obtained. [7] However, ten years later in Weeks v. United States, the exclusionary rule was favored over the common law view in the case. [8] During the course of two warrantless searches of his home, papers and other evidence were seized that convicted Weeks of mislabeling and shipping articles of food. The seized papers were claimed to be private papers just like the ones that Boyd was trying to get dismissed. In a unanimous decision, the court held the decision that the trial court......

Words: 4522 - Pages: 19

Premium Essay

Mapp Brief

...Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961) Facts of the Case In Cleveland, Ohio, 3 members of local law enforcement arrived at a house with the purpose of executing a search that was obtained in order to search the property where a supposed bomb suspect was hiding out, at the house were the plaintiff, Mapp, and her daughter, both of whom lived on the second story of the two-family residence. According to officers, they had received information that someone was hiding in the home that was wanted for questioning in relation to a recent bombing. Upon knocking on the door and demanding entrance to search the premises, Miss Mapp denied the request. The officers informed their commanding officer of the situation at hand, and waited in a surveillance position outside of the residence. Several hours later, the officers attempted to gain entry into the house a second time after back up of an additional 4 police officers arrived at the scene. At this time Miss Mapp refused to even open the door, they then forced their way into the dwelling by physical force. Miss Mapp's attorney arrived at the residence, the officers would not allow him entrance, nor would they allow him to view the search warrant. While Miss Mapp continued questioning the officers about the warrant, an officer quickly flashed a piece of paper, at which time Miss Mapp grabbed the piece of paper and proceeded to hide it in her chest area. This caused a conflict between the officers and Miss Mapp, which eventually led......

Words: 644 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Case Study

...1914, the Supreme Court has been concerned with the use of illegal means by the police to seize evidence in violation of the Constitution, and then using that evidence to convict a defendant in court (Dempsey, J., Forst, L., 2011). The court continually warned state courts and law enforcement agencies that they must amend their procedures in order to comply with the U.S. Constitution or risk the exclusionary rule being imposed on them as well. By 1961, the Supreme Court, noting that the state courts had not amended their procedures to conform to the Constitution, applied the exclusionary rule to the state courts and law enforcement agencies, as well as federal ones. The following cases Weeks vs. United States, Rochin vs. California and Mapp vs. Ohio, I will compare and contrast each individual case. I will also explain the effects that the ruling decision by the Supreme Court had on evidence obtained from police search and seizure. The first case I will focus on is Weeks vs. United States, in which this was the first case in U.S. history where the exclusionary rule was used. This case involved federal law enforcement personnel entering an arrested person’s home and seizing evidence without a warrant (Dempsey, J., Forst, L., 2011). In this case the evidence that was seized was used against the defendant and he was convicted because of it. As explained the exclusionary rule provided that any evidence seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment could not be used against a......

Words: 1442 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay


...Amendment. In the sixth amendment the exclusionary rule applies to the violations which make sure every citizen has the right to counsel. The exclusionary rule is used and applies to anyone who lives in the United States. “The courts finally decided on the exclusionary rule, the rule that says that evidence illegally seized may not be used as evidence, as a means of enforcement. “We’re sorry" doesn't quite cut it. The courts gave as their rationale for the rule the concept of "unclean hands." If the courts, the symbol of our highest justice, use evidence they know to be illegally obtained, they condone through their use of the evidence the illegal action and they then find themselves with "unclean hands." (Hill) In Weeks v. United States during it the exclusionary rule was brought up. In the case the court held that evidence that was taken by the police was illegally taken by police who is in violation of the fourth amendment and it couldn’t be used in court. In the exclusionary rule was extended to state courts, which is to help discourage police misconduct. In many cases judges are concerned with how evidence is required and what it proves. Many police raids that are warrantless have become a standard procedure for police, but sometimes in some cases. If the police can see the evidence in plain view that the court will except because the evidence was in plain view and the police wasn’t searching for evidence, so therefore it didn’t violate any rights and......

Words: 1290 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

The Exclusionary Rule

...uniquely American portent, the principle it protects and the justifications for its existence links to the vey origin of western civilization. To effusively grasp the advent of the exclusionary rule as promulgated in Boyd v. United States, it is critical to identify the theoretical foundations of law developed in Britain and America. Principally, two contradictory values can be cited as providing the validation and descent of all edict in the United States and the Britain especially England. These precise premises are the natural law and the positive law. The perspective of the positive law provides that the law is created by the people while the natural law constructs that the law has been in existence, with human being the discoverer and not the creator. Ordinarily, the discoveries implied are made by the ruling body. In this imperative facet of derivation, the emergence and consequent proliferation of the exclusionary rule illustrates an instance of a conflict between the two premises. Even though the constructs of natural and positive law instigated with the ancient Greeks, their impacts are enthusiastically witnessed upon the emergence of the exclusionary rule. Whereas the origin of the exclusionary rule resulted from the Supreme Court ruling on the Boyd v. US matter; the conjectural foundation for the rule is rooted in antiquity and the well-renowned dogmas in the necessity for discretion and private security from unsolicited and superfluous meddling. Although the......

Words: 2336 - Pages: 10