Peer Review/Position Paper
____________________________________________________________

Introduction
In his/her introduction, the writer should be incorporating what “they say” by situating his/her paper as a response to a preexisting conversation. He/she should also make it clear to whom his/her argument matters (“Who cares?”) and why (“So what?). Finally, the writer should provide a clear statement of his/her central claim and its supporting reasons.

Are all these elements clear to you? If yes, state these elements. For example, what is the situation? What is the writer's position? What is his/her central claim? Yes
The author argues that the controlled substance act should be changed to allow for legalization of marijuana, claims to support medical benefits.

If all the elements are not present, suggest some options for how the writer might go about satisfying these elements of the assignment.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Body
The writer should clearly state his/her reasons at the beginning of every section of support, then provide ample evidence to support those claims in the form of specific examples, details, observations, reasoning, etc.

Does the writer provide enough evidence to convince you that his/her reasons are true? If yes, what evidence is presented to persuade you of the writer's claims?

Author provides enough evidence through multiple statistics that have proven beneficial results, caution against smoked vs vaporized which have showed more medical improvement.

If not, describe what sort of evidence the writer would need to provide in order to convince you.

Counterargument(s)
At some point the writer should name an opponent, represent their argument fully and fairly, make concessions that show areas of agreement, and then respond with his/her own rebuttal.

Are all these moves made clearly and effectively? If yes, what counterargument is presented and how is it refuted?
Author does agree recreational drug use remain detrimental to the health of our nation but argues marijuana does have proven benefits

If not, suggest some options for how the writer might go about improving any or all of the moves by which they respond to an opponent.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Conclusion

For the concluding paragraph, the writer should reassert his/her central claim and summarize why his/her position is sound or perhaps even more reasonable than possible opponents. Ultimately, it should persuade readers to agree with the writer’s position.

Does the writer provide a compelling conclusion to his/her? If yes, what makes the writer’s conclusion persuasive?
Argument was persuasive, captures my attention as the audience. Patients should receive the most beneficial treatment for their illness-common ground achieved. Therefore the CSA need to change their scheduling class for marijuana.

If not, what might the writer do to influence his/her audience?