Free Essay

Mgmt 520 Week 3 Homework

In: Business and Management

Submitted By andreagrigsby
Words 1284
Pages 6
Andrea Grigsby
MGMT 520
Week 3 Homework
You will be able to upload both attachments in the same Dropbox. The Dropbox allows you to attach multiple documents in the same submission. Failure to submit your shepardized case will result in a loss of 10 points. You will not be able to submit it after your assignment has been graded.
Your assignment is due by Sunday, end of Week 3, 11:59 p.m. (MT).
(Note: You will not submit anything to the Homework CASE Dropbox.
Questions 1-6:
Week 3 Homework answers (there are 6 questions total).

While viewing the Nadel v. Burger King & Emil case answer the following questions:

1. What court decided the case in the assignment? (2 points)
Answer: Court of Appeals Ohio, First District, Hamilton County
2. What must a party establish to prevail on a motion for summary judgment? (3 points)
Answer: In order to prevail on a motion for summary judgment, a movant has the burden to demonstrate that no genuine issue of material fact remains to be litigated; that is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, and that it appears from the evidence, when viewed most strongly in favor of the nonmoving party, that reasonable minds can come to but tone conclusion and that conclusion is adverse to the non-moving party. The movant in this case would be the Nadel family.
Nadel v. Burger King Corp., 1997 WL 266762 (Ct. App, 1st Dist., Ohio)
3. Briefly – state the facts of this case, using the information found in the case in LexisNexis. (5 points)
Answer: The Christopher Nadel, the child was suffered severe burns by the hot coffee; spilled coffee is a forseeable circumstance from going through a drive through. It was undetermined if temperature the coffee was served at was too hot. It was determined there was no breach of warranty, there was not adequate warning about the product and there was no negligence as far as the emotional damage was concerned.
4. According to the case, why was this not a case of negligent infliction of emotional distress, and what tort did the court approve?
Answer: The case of negligent infliction of emotional distress was not granted for the following reasons. The grandmother’s statement that she was ‘worried,’ but sought no professional treatment thereafter and the father had been getting psychological treatment but for other reasons as the ‘incident’ just came up and wasn’t the primary reason for treatment. The court did reverse the summary judgment in regard to the design defect and failure to warn claims in their product liability claims.
5. According to the case, why didn't the court approve summary judgment for product liability claims? (5 points)
Answer: Based on the fact that the coffee caused second degree burns was sufficient enough to raise factual issue whether the coffee was unreasonably hot, thereby defeating summary judgment on design defect. Since the design defect was upheld thereby the failure-to-warn claim would stand as the arguments of intervening and superseding causation would not apply.
6. Do you agree with this decision? Why or why not? (5 points)
Answer: I agree with the affirmed decision on the breach of warranty claim. The decision I disagree with it where the court reverses the summary judgment regarding the design defect. Coffee in my experience varies vastly in the temperatures they serve it at, even my home coffee maker settings can be at one hundred seventy degrees, whether that would cause second degree burns or not I’m not sure. I do know when I make the mistake of taking a large drink to soon of any coffee purchases anywhere I burn my tongue, it seems that is a forseeable and just common sense matter that you would be careful with hot coffee as if it can burn your tongue or in this case was too hot for the grandmother to drink caution should have been taken. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
How to Shepardize the Nadel et al. v. Burger King Corp. & Emil, Inc. case:

Week 3 Homework case (there are 8 questions total):

A. The name and citation of the case (5 points) –
Answer: Angelina and Jack McMahon, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Bunn-O-Matic Corporation, James River Paper Company, and Wincup Holdings, L.P., Defendants
McMahon v. Bunn-O-Matic, ---F.3d--- (1998 WL 351294, 7th Cir.)

B. The name of the court which decided the case (3 points)
Answer: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

C. The year of the decision (2 points)
Answer: 1998

D. The facts of the case (5 points)
Answer: Angelina McMahon received third-degree burns when she spilled take-out coffee in her lap. She did this when she was transferring the coffee from one takeout cup to another, where the smaller cup she believes collapsed due to being made poorly or the heat from the coffee. She sued Bunn, the maker of the coffee machine used at the restaurant and the maker of the paper cup.

E. The issue of the case (5 points)
Answer: The McMahon’s then sued for design defect and failure to warn. The McMahon’s asserted that Bunn was liable for injuries due to their failure to warn consumers about the severity of burns that can occur from the heat of the coffee served from their coffee makers thus resulting in a design defect that produced an unreasonably dangerous product. McMahon v. Bunn-O-Matic, ---F.3d--- (1998 WL 351294, 7th Cir.)

F. The “decision” of the case (5 points)
Answer: Judgment was affirmed in favor of the coffee maker manufacturer. The court held there was no duty to warn when the coffee was not unusually hot as the consumer has general knowledge that coffee is served hot. The ruling was on design defect was the expert opinion was not based on facts or data and therefore not supportable evidence.

G. For what principle of law was the Nadel case used (cited for) in the case? (5 points) To find the answer to this question, use the Find feature in Word and search for Nadel. Just copy and paste what the case cites from Nadel as your response to this question.

Answer: The magistrate judge observed that both McMahons conceded during their depositions that "hotness" was one of the elements they value in coffee and that they sought out hot coffee, knew it could burn, and took precautions as a result. These concessions--which any adult coffee drinker is bound to make--foreclose the possibility of recovery, the opinion concluded. Other, similar suits have come to the same summary end, see Barnett v. Leiserv, Inc., 968 F. Supp. 690 (N.D. Ga.), affirmed without opinion, 137 F.3d 1356 (11th Cir. 1997); Greene v. Boddie-Noell Enterprises, Inc., 966 F. Supp. 416 (W.D. Va. 1997); Lamkin v. Braniff Airlines, Inc., 853 F. Supp. 30 (D. Mass. 1994); [**7] Oubre v. E-Z Serve Corp., 1998 La. App. LEXIS 1392 (5th Cir. 1998); Huppe v. Twenty-First Century Restaurants of America, Inc., 130 Misc. 2d 736, 497 N.Y.S.2d 306 (Sup. Ct. 1985), although one published opinion has held that a claim of this sort is triable, see Nadel v. Burger King Corp., 1997 Ohio App. LEXIS 2144 (1st Dist.), review denied, 80 Ohio St. 3d 1415, 684 N.E.2d 706 (1997), and a suit in New Mexico (Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants, P.T.S., Inc.) produced a widely publicized jury verdict of some $ 3 million but not a published opinion (the case was settled before appeal).
H. Submit a copy of the Shepardized Case (the case you used to answer questions A-G)(this is worth 10 points)

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Term Paper

...Week 2 Homework MGMT 520 1). State the administrative agency which controls the regulation. Explain why this agency and your proposed regulation interest you (briefly). Will this proposed regulation affect you or the business in which you are working? If so, how? DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (Food and Drug Administration) The reason I chose this agency and this particular regulation is because of my concern with the number of food borne illnesses. I’m a single mom of two and I want to make sure that my family isn’t exposed to food borne illnesses. Also, being in the Military and deploying it’s crucial that the FDA step in to make sure that food that’s supplied for us to eat while deployed is within standards. On one of my deployment we were hit with a case of salmonella poisoning that shut down a good portion of the base because of sickness from consumption. We were later told that the contaminated items were on our salad bar. When in a deployed location in a foreign country the last thing you need is for your troops to be anything but ready for combat, so situations like these have to be maintained. 2) Describe the proposal/change The first rule proposed would require makers of food to be sold in the United States, whether produced at a foreign- or domestic-based facility, to develop a formal plan for preventing their food products from causing foodborne illness. The rule would also require them to have plans for correcting any problems that arise. The FDA......

Words: 996 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Mgmt 520 Week 2 Assignment

...Hope Snell MGMT 520 Week 2 Homework Assignment Professor Bruskotter 7/17/14 1. State the administrative agency that controls the regulation. Explain why this agency and your proposed regulation interests you (briefly). Will this proposed regulation affect you or the business in which you are working? If so, how? Submit a copy of the proposed regulation along with your responses to these five questions. The proposed regulation can be submitted as either a separate Word document (.doc) or Adobe file (.pdf). This means you will submit two attachments to the Week 2 Dropbox: (1) a Word doc with the questions and your answers and (2) a copy of the proposed regulation you used for this assignment. (10 points) Agency: US Department of Veteran Affairs Interest: My husband is soon to retire from the military and will be a veteran. He will be using a VA facility and being prescribed medication as well. Effect of regulation: This will affect my family financially once my husband retires because his income will decrease, but his prescription co-pay will increase. He currently has no copay for his prescriptions, but if he had, it would be substantial. 2. Describe the proposal or change. (10 points) This proposal will increase the costs of the copayment that some veterans pay for outpatient prescriptions. Some veterans will be excluded from the proposal, but most will be affected because they don’t meet the exclusion requirements. 3. Write the public comment that you would submit to this...

Words: 1148 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Administratve Regultion

...Gwendolyn Smith MGMT 520 Prof Carr May 22,, 2015 MGMT 520: Week two Homework 1. State the administrative agency that that controls the regulation? The agency that controls SAMHSA is the US Dept. of Health and Human Services. Congress established Samhsa in 1992 to make substance abuse and mental health information, services and research more accessible. Briefly explain why this agency and the proposed regulation change interest you? I chose The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration also known as SAMHA because I have worked in the field of substance abuse for over 20 years. The regulation I have chosen is the Affordable health Care Act 2010 has a direct effect on the clients that I serve. This regulation has and will continue to affect my clients and the business that I am in and the agency I work for. The affordable health care caused our agency to become third party insurance providers to be able to continue services for the majority of our clients and to remain marketable in a system of continual change. 2. Describe the proposal or change? http://www.hhs.gov/healthcare/facts/timeline/timeline-text.htm * Making Care More Affordable. Tax credits to make it easier for the middle class to afford insurance will become available for people with income between 100% and 400% of the poverty line who are not eligible for other affordable coverage. (In 2010, 400% of the poverty line comes out to about $43,000 for an individual or $88,000 for a......

Words: 2534 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Dfsfd

...Brazil Canada Mexico Singapore Spain United Kingdom United States Managerial Economics: A Problem-Solving Approach Luke M. Froeb VP/Editorial Director: Jack W. Calhoun Editor-in-Chief: Alex von Rosenberg Sr. Acquisitions Editor: Mike Worls Sr. Content Project Manager: Cliff Kallemeyn Brian T. McCann Art Director: Michelle Kunkler Sr. First Print Buyer: Sandee Milewski Printer: West Group Eagan, MN Marketing Manager: Jennifer Garamy Marketing Coordinator: Courtney Wolstoncroft Technology Project Manager: Dana Cowden COPYRIGHT ª 2008 Thomson South-Western, a part of The Thomson Corporation. Thomson, the Star logo, and SouthWestern are trademarks used herein under license. Printed in the United States of America 1 2 3 4 5 09 08 07 06 ISBN-13: 978-0-324-35981-7 ISBN-10: 0-324-35981-0 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this work covered by the copyright hereon may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means—graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping, Web distribution or information storage and retrieval systems, or in any other manner—without the written permission of the publisher. For permission to use material from this text or product, submit a request online at http://www.thomsonrights.com. Library of Congress Control Number: 2007921344 For more information about our products, contact us at: Thomson Learning Academic Resource Center 1-800-423-0563 Thomson Higher Education 5191 Natorp Boulevard Mason, OH......

Words: 112158 - Pages: 449

Premium Essay

Managerial Economics Pdf File

...mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping, Web distribution, information storage and retrieval systems, or in any other manner—except as may be permitted by the license terms herein. For product information and technology assistance, contact us at Cengage Learning Customer & Sales Support, 1-800-354-9706 For permission to use material from this text or product, submit all requests online at www.cengage.com/permissions Further permissions questions can be emailed to permissionrequest@cengage.com Print Buyer: Sandee Milewski Production Service: Pre-Press PMG Library of Congress Control Number: 2009931116 Copyeditor: Nicole Schlutt ISBN-13: 978-1-439-07798-6 Compositor: Pre-Press PMG ISBN-10: 1-439-07798-3 Senior Art Director: Michelle Kunkler Internal Designer: Pre-Press PMG Cover Designer: Tin Box Studio Cover Image: Pawel Gaul/iStockphoto South-Western Cengage Learning 5191 Natorp Boulevard Mason, OH...

Words: 130248 - Pages: 521

Premium Essay

Pmda Handbook New Product Developme

...THE PDMA HANDBOOK OF NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT T HIRD E DITION Kenneth B. Kahn, Editor Associate Editors: Sally Evans Kay Rebecca J. Slotegraaf Steve Uban JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC. Cover image: © Les Cunliffe/iStockphoto Cover design: Elizabeth Brooks This book is printed on acid-free paper. Copyright © 2013 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey Published simultaneously in Canada No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax (978) 646-8600, or on the web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, (201) 748-6011, fax (201) 7486008, or online at www.wiley.com/go/permissions. Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with the respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents......

Words: 165678 - Pages: 663

Premium Essay

Word

...This RAR is effective 20 September 2011. The portions affected by this RAR are listed in the summary of change. Summary. This regulation consolidates policy and guidance for Army training and leader development and supports a full-spectrum, force protection, expeditionary Army. Applicability. This regulation applies to the active Army, the Army National Guard/Army National Guard of the United States, and the U.S. Army Reserve, unless otherwise stated. It also applies to Department of the Army civilian employees. During mobilization, the proponent may modify the policies and procedures contained in this regulation. Proponent and exception authority. The proponent of this regulation is the Contents Deputy Chief of Staff, G–3/5/7....

Words: 129456 - Pages: 518

Premium Essay

Accounting

...by McGraw-Hill, a business unit of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1221 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10020. Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Previous editions © 2009, 2006, and 2003. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written consent of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., including, but not limited to, in any network or other electronic storage or transmission, or broadcast for distance learning. Some ancillaries, including electronic and print components, may not be available to customers outside the United States. This book is printed on acid-free paper. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 DOW/DOW 1 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 ISBN MHID 978-0-07-813672-6 0-07-813672-5 Vice President & Editor-in-Chief: Brent Gordon Vice President of EDP: Sesha Bolisetty Editorial Director: Stewart Mattson Sponsoring Editor: Dick Hercher Marketing Manager: Sankha Basu Editorial Coordinator: Rebecca Mann Project Manager: Erin Melloy Design Coordinator: Brenda A. Rolwes Cover Designer: Studio Montage, St. Louis, Missouri Production Supervisor: Sue Culbertson Media Project Manager: Balaji Sundararaman Compositor: MPS Limited, A Macmillan Company Typeface: 10/12 Times New Roman Printer: R. R. Donnelley-Willard All credits appearing on page or at the end of the book are considered to be an extension of the copyright page. Library of Congress......

Words: 209552 - Pages: 839

Premium Essay

Accounting for Decision Making and Control

...by McGraw-Hill, a business unit of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1221 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10020. Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Previous editions © 2009, 2006, and 2003. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written consent of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., including, but not limited to, in any network or other electronic storage or transmission, or broadcast for distance learning. Some ancillaries, including electronic and print components, may not be available to customers outside the United States. This book is printed on acid-free paper. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 DOW/DOW 1 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 ISBN MHID 978-0-07-813672-6 0-07-813672-5 Vice President & Editor-in-Chief: Brent Gordon Vice President of EDP: Sesha Bolisetty Editorial Director: Stewart Mattson Sponsoring Editor: Dick Hercher Marketing Manager: Sankha Basu Editorial Coordinator: Rebecca Mann Project Manager: Erin Melloy Design Coordinator: Brenda A. Rolwes Cover Designer: Studio Montage, St. Louis, Missouri Production Supervisor: Sue Culbertson Media Project Manager: Balaji Sundararaman Compositor: MPS Limited, A Macmillan Company Typeface: 10/12 Times New Roman Printer: R. R. Donnelley-Willard All credits appearing on page or at the end of the book are considered to be an extension of the copyright page. Library of Congress......

Words: 209552 - Pages: 839