Premium Essay

Mgmt520 Week 1 Assignment

In:

Submitted By kummindk
Words 691
Pages 3
1. This story is about the Supreme Court’s decision. What process did this case have to go through to get to the Supreme Court?

Parties who are not satisfied with the decision of a lower court must petition the U.S. Supreme Court to hear their case. The primary means to petition the court for review is to ask it to grant a writ of certiorari. This is a request that the Supreme Court order a lower court to send up the record of the case for review (Supreme Court Decisions, 2015).

2. In the story, two justices wrote differing opinions about the issue. Discuss the differences between a majority opinion, a concurring opinion, and a dissenting opinion. What effect does each type of opinion have on the state of the law in America?

The majority opinion reflects the resolution agreed upon by more than half of the members of the court. The task of writing the majority opinion is assigned to one of the justices in that group. Justices who agree with the result of the main opinion, or the resolution of the dispute between the two parties, but base their decision on a different rationale may issue one or more concurring opinion. Likewise, justices who disagree with the main opinion in both result and legal rationale may issue one or more dissenting opinion (How to read, 2012). The effect these have on the state of law in America is that it sets a precedence that will be used for similar cases in the future. If a precedence has been set, then it is much harder to rule in a different direction. So it is important that the Supreme Court gets it right in order to protect the innocent in the future.

3. What type of jurisdiction did the federal courts have in this case? Was it a federal question case or a diversity of citizenship case? Why?

The federal courts had jurisdiction based of the Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule 23(b)(2), which governs civil procedures. Something

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Mgmnt 520 Week 3 Devry University

...MGMT520 9/16/2014 Assignment week 3 Assignment: For this assignment, you will need to access the LexisNexis database in the Keller Library, from the Student Resources area under Course Home. Go to Kubasek, Chapter 13, page 369, problem 13-16. Use LexisNexis in the Keller library and look up the Nadel et al. v. Burger King Corp. & Emil, Inc. case. Use the citation you find in your book to do the search. Read the case and answer these questions. Copy and paste this information into a Word document, include your name on that document, and answer the questions. 1. What court decided the case in the assignment? (2 points) Court of Appeals of Ohio, First District, Hamilton County. 119 Ohio App.3d 578 (1997) 2. According to the case, what must a party establish to prevail on a motion for summary judgment? (3 points) In order for a party to establish or prevail for a motion for summary judgment. They need to have sworn, certified, authenticated by affidavit. 3. Briefly state the facts of this case, using the information found in the case in LexisNexis. (5 points) 1. Paul Nadel and Evelyn Nadel ordered coffee and breakfast on the morning of December 1993 2. Paul Nadel turned left spilling hot coffee on his sons foot that caused 2nd degree burns. 3. Burger King manual read that the coffee was to be served at One hundred seventy-five degrees. 4. Medical records were true copies of what was received through discovery. 5. No warning label on the coffee container. ...

Words: 753 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Paper

...MGMT520 Legal, Political, and Ethical Dimensions Professor Deardurff Assignment I By Rodney L. Joash | | 1. State the administrative agency which controls the regulation. Explain why this agency and your proposed regulation interests you (briefly). Will this proposed regulation affect you or the business in which you are working? If so, how? Submit a copy of the proposed regulation along with your responses to these five questions. The proposed regulation can be submitted as either a separate Word document (.doc) or Adobe file (.pdf). This means you will submit two attachments to the Week 2 Dropbox: (2) a Word doc with the questions and your answers and (2) a copy of the proposed regulation you used for this assignment. (10 points) DEPARTMENT OF HOMELANDSECURITY Office of the Secretary-Nondiscrimination in Matters Pertaining to Faith-Based Organizations-I am interested in the proposed regulation because I am involved in a religion or faith base organization. This will affect the organization to received funds with other non-profit organizations. 2. Describe the proposal/change.  Consistent with the President’sinitiative, this proposed rule would amend DHS’ regulations to make clear that faith-based organizations are eligible to participate in any social or community service programs established, administered or funded by DHS (including any component of DHS) (collectively, ‘‘DHS service programs’’), and are eligible to seek and receive Federal financial...

Words: 347 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Mgmt 520

...Week 2 Assignment MGMT520 ASSIGNMENT QUESTIONS: 1. Identify the administrative agency (full name, not just the acronym) which controls the regulation. Briefly explain why this agency and your proposed regulation interest you. If this proposed regulation will affect you or the business in which you are working, please explain how. It is not required that the proposed regulation affect you professionally or personally. You can use any regulation for this assignment so long as you are able to answer the questions posed here (Questions 1-5). (10 points) Answer: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. I’m interested in environmental and animal conservation and this agency ensures stewardship of natural resources and the wildlife within. 2. Describe the proposal/change in your own words. (10 points) Answer: The proposal aims at classifying the Sakhalin Bay-Amur River stock of beluga whales as depleted which would offer them additional protections under the Marine Mammal Protection Act. 3. Write a comment which you would submit to the administrative agency regarding this proposed regulation. (For example, are you in favor of the proposed regulation or against it? Why?) If the deadline for comments has already passed, write the comment you would have submitted had there been time. Also, explain briefly what you wish to accomplish with your comment. (10 points) Answer: I support this proposal of enacting ‘depleted’ status for Sakhalin Bay-Amur River stock of beluga...

Words: 902 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Mgmt 520 Week 2

...MGMT520 - WEEK 2 ASSIGNMENT Jorge Hernandez ASSIGNMENT QUESTIONS: 1. Identify the administrative agency (full name, not just the acronym) which controls the regulation. Briefly explain why this agency and your proposed regulation interests you. If this proposed regulation will affect you or the business in which you are working, please explain how. It is not required that the proposed regulation affect you professionally or personally. You can use any regulation for this assignment so long as you are able to answer the questions posed here (Questions 1-5). Answer: Airworthiness Directives: The Boeing Company Airplanes Agency: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Action: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) I do travel a lot through different airlines so reading this interests me because regular customers like us wouldn’t even notice of such problems and this could make anyone think twice before getting in an airplane. Even though this will not affect me economically, having the idea that something is wrong with the airplanes, could make me not travel and visit my family for a while. 2. Describe the proposal/change in your own words. Answer: Airworthiness Directives are required to do repetitive functional checks for blockage of the forward strut drain line, and doing corrective actions; and a one-time cleaning of certain forward strut drain lines. This repeated inspections will to detect and correct blockage of forward strut drain lines, which could...

Words: 1249 - Pages: 5