Free Essay

Middle East Policy

In: Social Issues

Submitted By locortez
Words 2099
Pages 9
An American Policy in Transitioning Middle Eastern Environments For many decades the Middle East region dealt with power struggles, badly drawn borders, and the Arab-Israeli conflict or Israeli-Palestinian conflict. These examples are just some of what plagues the region and attests to their continued unstableness. The Middle East will undoubtedly remain unstable now and through the near future as it tries to rewrite constitutions, call for reforms, and is engaged in ongoing protests. Regardless, building a stable economic power and government is not one simple solution and takes time. As some nations strive for liberal democracies or constitutional monarchies, there must be political pluralism and with that secularism or at least pseudo-secularism. All things equal, the U.S. foreign policy must see a change in its promotion— a different, new way to deal with the Middle East as a whole and the diverse specific countries. There is no question as to whether conflict will arise in other countries within the Middle East, we know it will, but how the U.S. chooses to position itself in the fight includes stability and democracy on the overall position and relationships and development in terms of specific countries. This paper explains steps that could be taken in forming a U.S. foreign policy in the emerging Middle East region. Some people educated or not about foreign affairs are pushing for the U.S. to take action and use the Middle East crises as an advantage. They want to use this time as a way the U.S. can pursue its goals for forming a more cooperate region. Conversely, many people are opposed to getting involved to a certain extent. According to a poll on FoxNews.com, 58.7 percent of the people surveyed believed the U.S. should get involved only a little in the Egypt crisis, “getting involved is likely to backfire, so let Egypt work it out” was the consensus. (Public) Still, I believe either choice must be pursued with caution and steered far from any kind of oppression. The U.S. does not want emerging regions to feel as if we have underlying corrupt intentions. Also, our engaging with other international coalitions must be discreet in order to attain our creditability. The Middle East people have long succumbed to political longevity and as the new emerging regions form the U.S. should back diverse governments. The main purpose or one overall ideal goal the U.S. should have for the Middle East as a whole in terms of policy is a humanitarian and non-oppressive “transition of power” where the people of the country have a voice. (Green and Gaouette) Although politicians and leaders have pointed an “orderly” transition is important I believe focusing on the people’s voice is imperative because it promotes democracy in the long run and changes in the present. The people want to be heard, as you can see by protests, and we must listen and stray away for our contentedness we have kept with leaders for so long. It is no secret the U.S. promotes democracy, but even a constitutional monarchy would be a better way people could vote a party to power just as they do in European countries. Now, countries are seeing their counterparts can overthrow their regimes and are taking note. The transition period has only just begun; therefore, can the U.S. rely on the notion of stability to really be restored when emotions are so hostile and deep-rooted? Visibly, the answer is no. Striving for stability in such unstable and sometimes uncooperative societies is not something that would even put world affairs back to its former state. Nations have been shaken up and the times of change are upon us. Transformation in the time of change is something we should seek and advance. Accordingly, one principle the U.S. should use is promoting governments with many parties not one National party. Another principle should be governments should embrace democracy or quasi-democracy but keep a religious identity. This is an especially important point. As we know culture is instilled deep within a society and it is used as a way its citizens cope with the world and interact internally with each other. For the U.S. to think they can change a whole culture would be foolish. What we can hope to change very slowly would be doctrinal values in the form of politics. Primarily focusing on the younger generations in some regions and basic disbursement of power in others (constitutional monarchies). While the U.S. should encourage its countries’ values to the Middle East region such as freedom of speech, press (including internet options), and assembly they must keep an open mind. Again, the Islamic countries have values and a culture that are resistant to change. As a result of this difficult situation we should team with the vision of those that pursue “the Koran is not the constitution.” (Vidino) Rather the younger generation of the Islamic culture “speaks of human rights and compares itself to Europe’s Christian Democrats—embracing democracy but keeping a religious identity.” (Vidino) Our policy toward the Middle East should no longer accept the identity of most to be forced upon others as it has for so long. We should work to develop relationships with the younger generation. We also should recognize that there might be room for limited engagement with the Muslim Brotherhood as the Eisenhower administration did in the Cold War. (Vidino) Nevertheless, the process will be muddled and our policy of non-oppression or “freedom of assembly without fear” must be carried throughout each nation. (Kernis) This includes the aftermath and development of regimes. The downfall to any foreign involvement is the same: other people hate the U.S. for meddling in their affairs, it costs the U.S. a lot of money, and if taken far enough Americans die. In the long term we will improve relationships on a specific-country level if we can help during the transition process enough to see it through and also protect our economic interests such as oil. If nations continue to oppress and kill civilians inside their borders blatantly I expect the U.S. to take action, as they should. Yet, the process of a transformation in each country is different due to its existing political make-up, economics, and socio-economics. Leaders in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya and Yemen have been in power for many decades and each run corrupt and tyrannical governments. According to abc.com Mubarak alone is estimated to have a worth anywhere from 40 to 70 billion dollars. (Kim) The people of Egypt know the government is corrupt and hence have many frustrations. When high unemployment, martyrs, and young individuals being killed by police get factored into the situation, frustrations only gain momentum and opposition forces become unmanageable and uncooperative. There is no turning back. Therefore, each country must be dealt with on a case-by-case basis. So, the bigger question to answer is how do we promote change? What policy should the U.S. really follow for specific countries? The younger generation is not holding back and many are protesting at the expense of their lives. Working with these individuals is an obvious option, but they can be too unstable to cooperate with a country they resent. Just as the U.S. has worked with other opposition forces in Afghanistan this choice seems feasible. Again, I believe the U.S. foreign policy should take more of an Eisenhower approach than a Bush one. Instead of marching in with military arms and insurgencies we should recognize the opposition forces that are willing to work with us as well as the new forming governments. In terms of more civil societies such as Egypt and Tunisia to name a few, the U.S. really didn’t need to get involved too much. The transitions did involve casualties but intervention was minimal. Our association with Egypt is something we need to maintain through their developing stages to assure our strong relationship. We should work with civil societies in a civil way. New leaders should be someone of whom the people’s voice will reflect. In terms of tribal societies such as Yemen and Libya and places that very much oppose U.S. intervention there needs to be critical planning on the policy pursued. In Libya, the transition will take much longer as Qaddafi said he will “die a martyr” before he backs down. (Muammar Gaddafi) Rightly so, his people are forming opposition forces. These countries need in the simplest form elections, parties, and economic and technical help. Yet, in light of uncivil protests, democracy is not a country’s first priority. Survival is more what they are seeking. Therefore, as long as we can promote our humanitarian approach to keep protesters alive and out of harm from governments, America can work with opposition forces like the National Council or take matters into their own hands. Even so, as we have seen the U.S. does not need to get into another long engaging war like those in Iraq and Afghanistan. We cannot send insurgencies into every nation because they are unfit to run the government themselves. But, as civilians are killed day after day the U.S. will not stand by. We would not want to ignore a situation like this where we have seen “how ignoring Afghanistan led to the growth of Al-Qaeda in that country.“ (enotes.com) Our policy should include workable sanctions and not to repeat the past. Fly-zones “did not prevent Saddam Hussein from slaughtering people on the ground and it did not get him out of office.” (Green and Gaouette) We should also not trust tribal society leaders. Moreover, I believe, as the U.S. is the most powerful democracy in the world it has taken on the parent role in world affairs and cannot step back into isolationism. However, I would like to believe these decisions to step in are not based on political gain; politics always has its part. In addition, opposition forces are not our only allies. International coalitions like the Arab League and Europe are essential. The U.S. must remember these foreign partners know the area, sites, and region better than us. If it comes to it two heads are bigger than one, but four would be even better. An international military action would be ideal when an overt condition becomes noticeable. Aforementioned, the U.S. will and should not stand by while oppression of this magnitude is present on civilian protestors or opposition forces. To close, it seems simple to speak of a solution but nothing is definite to work. Treating civil societies with civility and tribal societies with military action seems so simple. Yet, the complexity comes the minute we intervene. Our believed responsibilities come with consequences that end in ramifications. The idea of “leveling the military advantage” in countries and decreasing oppression while providing humanitarian aid should be the U.S. goal. (Rozen) While we may be a powerful force this fight includes many others. Europe has a strong existence in the Middle East affairs that dates far back and the Arab world has their own coalitions that we must align with. This policy change to democracy from stability can lead to greater relationships between all those involved and developments of a society the Middle Eastern people seek. Lastly, people around the world listen when the U.S. speaks and the U.S. should listen to those voices in need whether its political crises or natural disasters.

Works Cited

enotes.com. "Should the U.S. get involved in foreign conflicts or should the U.S. stay

out of world affairs?" 9 February 2010.

Green, Peter S. and Nicole Gaouette. Bill Clinton Says U.S. Should Support a No-Fly

Zone to Help Libyan Rebels. 10 March 2011. 13 March 2011.

Kernis, Jay. Marandi: Recent events in other Middle East countries will not be

repeated in Iran. 28 February 2011. 14 March 2011.

Kim, Susanna. Egypt's Mubarak Likely to Retain Vast Wealth . 2 February 2011. 14

March 2011.

Muammar Gaddafi. 20 March 2011. 19 March 2011.

Nichols, David A. Eisenhower, master of the Middle East. 13 March 2011. 14 March

2011.

Public. How Much Should U.S. Get Involved in Egypt Crisis? 03 February 2011. 13

March 2011.

Rozen, Laura. U.S. seeks international consensus on Libya response. 10 March 2011.

13 March 2011.

Vidino, Lorenzo. Five Myths about the Muslim Brotherhood. 6 March 2011. 14

March 2011.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

American Policies Towards the Middle East

...The Pros and the Cons of Middle East Policies Name of Student Institution. The Pros and the Cons of Middle East Policies Background The international politics and relations are currently being dominated by the issue of the Middle East and the US relationship. It is, therefore, important to look at the factors that have resulted in a fragile relationship between the world superpower and the Middle East. For decades, the Middle East has been dealing with power struggles, Israeli-Palestinian border conflict, and the Arab-Israeli war. Some states in the region are pushing for constitutional monarchies or liberal democracies. My essay will examine the underlying animosity between these nations. It will also look at the pros and con of the American policies towards the Middle East and the ways it has succeeded. Hypothesis The USA is doing enough in its dealings with the Middle East. Analysis There has been an ongoing debate regarding the question of what the US’s foreign policies are towards the Middle East. Two main defense strategy objectives were resulting from the Pentagon’s Defense Planning Guidance between the year 1994 and 1999 (Reveron et al., 2014). This period was prior to President Bush Jr. Administration and has since then become more relevant. The primary objective was to deter another world war or an extreme enmity like the one portrayed between the former Soviet Union towards America. A new region strategy has therefore been put in place to prevent a hostile power from...

Words: 1520 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Homeland Security

...States in particular. The relationship with Israel designates the foreign policy of the United States in regards to the rest of the Middle East. This thereby impacts foreign policy throughout the world. “The centerpiece of U.S. Middle East policy has been its relationship with Israel. The combination of unwavering U.S. support for Israel and the related effort to spread democracy throughout the region has inflamed Arab and Islamic opinion and jeopardized U.S. security.” (Mearsheimer and Walt, 1) The United States did not take an overly "sympathetic" position on the Zionist movement until the second decade of the 1900s. One main reason for their new support was the establishment in 1914 of the Provisional Executive Committee for General Zionist Affairs. On September 21, 1922, the United States Congress passed the Lodge-Fish resolution, which lent the support of the United States for Zionists to establish a homeland in Palestine. In May of 1942 at the Biltimore Conference, the Zionists made the declaration that Palestine needed to be recognized as a "Jewish Commonwealth." (Oren, 442) The end of the Second World War brought about two changes in the Middle East. The first of these changes was the decolonization of the Middle Eastern states; Britain and France withdrew from some of their colonies early on, but remained in others for more years to come. The second of these changes was the involvement of the Middle East in the Cold War. “The most controversial of all withdrawals, Brown...

Words: 4167 - Pages: 17

Premium Essay

Jewish Lobby Case Study

...Introduction Most references are often made to the "Jewish lobby" with the purpose of describing Jewish political influence in the United States. This offers a shallow and an inadequate position. It is evident that Americans of Jewish descent are at times represented by lobbyists. However, such direct efforts to influence the policy making process are but a small part of the lobby’s ability to shape policy, (Bard, 2004). According to Teitelbaum, (2010), the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) is a registered lobby being one of the organized groups that try to influence legislation. Other groups like B’nai B’rith and Hadassah do not engage in direct lobbying. However, they disseminate information while encouraging their members to become more involved in political processes. Most times they specifically attempt to lobby on specific issues though they have rarely influenced policy. The Israel lobby grew significantly in the 1980s, but controversy arose from opponents of the lobby and supporters. This was due to the proposed sale of the AWACS warning and command system in 1981 to Saudi Arabia, (Teitelbaum, 2010). This angered many Israeli supporters in the United States. The sale was intended to appease Arab nations in an attempt to promote stability...

Words: 1995 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Us Foreign Relations in Me

...The Good, the Bad and the Worst An Assessment of the U.S relations and policies in the Middle East Gold and silver where the elements of wealth during the peak of mercantilism as the sole policy back then was the 3G’s policy (God, Gold and Glory) in the reign of the British and French Empires. Oil, however, climbed to the top of the chart of the most strategic commodities starting the early years of industrialization passing by the Second World War, when the U.S. became by far the largest oil consuming nation; consuming oil at abundant rates to support their troops overseas and to maintain the high rate of consumerism of the American lifestyle in the homeland. Soon oil grabbed the attention of the top industrialist nations as the most critical element of their survival as super industrial economies to ensure their growing manufacturing base is supported by adequate oil supplies. Having almost two thirds of the oil reserve in the world, the Middle East became the center of attention for all industrial nations, some of which had more strategic plans than others. Both, Britain and the United States realized that their wealth and survival as super powers is so much correlated with their level of control and development of the Middle East oil-rich countries. However, the feasibility of running the Arabian states both politically and economically faded in the 20th century, since maintaining their administration was too expensive for the United Kingdom, and gradually started...

Words: 3243 - Pages: 13

Free Essay

The United States and the Middle East

...United States and the Middle East For the past few decades, United States foreign policy has revolved around the situation in the Middle East. This is due mostly to the fact that tensions between the United States and the Islamic countries of the Middle East are always high. Also with the United States’ most valuable resource, oil, found in highest supply in the Middle East, America has a vested economic interest into the political stability of the region. However, after a costly war in Iraq that tarnished our image not only in the Middle East but around the world and a situation in Israel that hasn’t shown any lasting progress for decades, it’s time for the United States to take another look at its political strategy for achieving lasting peace in the region. With the events of early 2011 in the Middle East, otherwise known as Arab Spring, the region has become highly unstable and vulnerable to the influences of terrorism. This is a critical time for the United States to reestablish healthy diplomatic relations in the region in order to decrease the spread terrorism and harsh anti-American sentiment as well as bring about a lasting peace. In order for America to improve its foreign affairs in the Middle East it needs to finish strong in Iraq and Afghanistan, reach a peace agreement in Israel, push for more diplomacy with Iran, and support the rebels in Syria fighting injustice. By involving the rest of the world in the current situation in the Middle East the United States...

Words: 4029 - Pages: 17

Free Essay

Europe and the Middle East

... Vol. 4, No. 3; July 2012 Europe and the Middle East: From Imperialism to Liberal Peace? Raymond Hinnebusch1 1 School of International Relations, University of St Andrews, Scotland, UK Correspondence: Raymond Hinnebusch, School of International Relations, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9AX, Scotland, UK. Tel: 44-1334-462-861. E-mail: rh10@st-andrews.ac.uk Received: November 24, 2011 Accepted: April 26, 2012 Online Published: July 1, 2012 doi:10.5539/res.v4n3p18 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/res.v4n3p18 Abstract Europe’s relation with the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) is discussed in the context of normative (International Society) and materialist approaches (World System’s Theory). First, European imperialism’s export of a flawed Westphalian state system is summarized. How Europe is “caught” between MENA and the US and co-opted into a division of labour toward the region is then surveyed. The gap between the normative rhetoric and actual inequitable outcomes and structures constructed under the Euro-Mediterranean partnership is examined, looking at the three “baskets” of economic developmental, political reform and cultural convergence. Four “hard cases,” EU policies toward Palestine, Iran, Syria and Turkey, illustrate the ambiguities of the EU’s approach to MENA. MENA public opinion’s ambivalence toward Europe reflects these realities. The conclusion is that the EU’sMENA policy is caught between the rhetoric of post-colonialism...

Words: 11398 - Pages: 46

Free Essay

American Hegemony

...British to American hegemony in the Persian Gulf and review how various aspects of this are described and interpreted in the literature. This paper will deal with this transition between the years of 1945, the end of the Second World War, and 1971, the year that the British completed their military withdrawal from the Persian Gulf. Even though the Americans were interested in the area before the WWII, the year 1945 was chosen as a starting point because the war had severely altered the power equilibrium between the great powers the United States of America and Britain were considered as at that time. During the Cold War, which started in 1946 the importance of the region was on the rise, both because of the oil and because of the containment policy against the Russians. The relevance of the region was on the rise for America in particular because the power of Britain was waning in the post-war era. Britain, faced with economic hardship, imperial fatigue, and events of humiliation such as the Suez Crisis of 1956-57, was entering the dawn of its empire, something that was slowly sinking in with both London and Washington. The process of the replacement of the British by the American hegemony was not always equally obvious, but it was a slow but steady intensification of American inters tint he period while the British interests and will to remain in the region were slowly...

Words: 6767 - Pages: 28

Free Essay

New Era in Turkish Foreign Policy

...THE TURKISH REPUBLIC CAG UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF ECONOMIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THE NEW ERA IN TURKISH FOREIG POLICY: A MULTI- DIMENSIONAL TURKISH FOREIGN POLICY Erhan KAYA SEMINARY THESIS ADVISER PROF. DR. ALI ENGIN OBA YENICE-MERSIN/2011 Approval of the Graduate School of Economic and Administrative Sciences ________________ Prof. Dr. Ali Engin Oba Adviser I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. ________________ Prof. Dr. Esat Arslan Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr. Esat Arslan ________________ Prof. Dr. Ali Engin Oba ________________ I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all materials and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last Name: Erhan Kaya Signature: I would like to thank Professor...

Words: 8038 - Pages: 33

Free Essay

Global Business Environment

...the analysis of FDI activities, Giordano’s FDI activities have many impacts on host economies, like job creation in Indonesia.  This report draws on sales data of main Asian markets and subordinate brands to analyse the trend of investment of Giordano. Korea is the most important and second market except Mainland China;The Middle East grows quickly during last decades; Singapore is a stable and profitable market. Malaysia and Indonesia are potential markets, and from a long term perspective Giordano will focus on the development of these countries.  Asia is the basic market of Giordano, which conducts over 95% foreign investment there.  This report applies SWOT analysis to illustrate the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats, and also uses PEST analysis to explain the external factors-political, economic, social and technological, which influence the investment direction in the future.  Country screening process identifies company-specific criteria, which enable them to rank countries. Giordano mainly selects countries in Asia and compares their political and economic environment, etc, Finally, Singapore, South Korea, the Middle East, Malaysia, and Indonesia are selected to be the primary markets.  BCG box analyses the subordinate brand of Giordano.  Finally, this report analyses the post financial crisis era of Giordano. Part A...

Words: 2961 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Us Options in Afghanistan

...March 19, 2012 Much to American anger and displeasure, India is in no mood to reduce its energy ties with Iran. Let us say that the Indian policy makers are cognizant of some of the critical facts concerning Iran. *       That the international community has serious misgivings about the peaceful intentions of the Iranian nuclear programme. *       That India is formally opposed to a nuclear Iran. *       That under American sanctions, in December 2010 India had to terminate the Asian Customs Union (ACU) arrangement to pay for its oil imports from Iran. *       That alternative payment arrangements through Germany, Turkey and the UAE were unsuccessful, finally forcing India and Iran to settle for partial rupee payment for oil imports. *       That the rupee payment arrangement covers only 45 percent of the oil bill because the trade balance is highly in favour of Iran. *       That State-own Shipping Corporation India has refused to ship crude from Iran because it could not find the necessary insurance cover. *       That there are growing concerns over a possible Israeli military strike against Iranian nuclear installations. *       That India would have learned some lessons from the September 2005 fiasco over the IAEA vote. Not only its anti-Iranian vote was a last minute decision, the manner in which it executed and explained its vote clearly revealed that New Delhi acted under pressure from Washington. This inept handling angered Tehran and displeased Washington. ...

Words: 1281 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Blackberry

...strength among business entities and government agencies in the UK, US and Canada. However, despite the strong security unmatched by rivals such as Apple Inc, Google Inc and Nokia Corp, controversies surrounding its security soon emerge prominently from its Asia and Middle East market. The main reason for this can be related to the number of terrorist attack on that region. Due to the strong security of Blackberry system, it provides a perfect communication medium for terrorists or any parties with malicious intent to communicate, plan and execute their ploy without fear of the their emails, text messages or phone calls being tapped by the government or intelligence body. Thus, due to a number of terrorist attack that was investigated to be planned via Blackberry (due to Blackberry being found in the possession of the terrorist), it is a legitimate concern regarding to Blackberry’s security system from the governments of the region. Second reason as to why the Western countries where Blackberry has large customer base such as US, UK and Canada doesn’t seem to care much about the security concern of Blackberry system is due to their technical and technological superiority over their counterparts in Middle East or Asia region. They have advanced technology to intercept communications and they have agencies that actively performing espionage all over the world. Hence, it was no...

Words: 1354 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Term Paper

...World Economic and Financial Sur veys Regional Economic Outlook Middle East and Central Asia 09 I N T E R N A T I O N A L M O N E T A R Y M AY F U N D W o r l d E c o n o m i c a n d F in a n c i a l S u r v e y s Regional Economic Outlook Middle East and Central Asia •••••••••••••••••••••• 09 I N T E R N A T I O N A L M O N E T A R Y F MAY U N D ©2009 International Monetary Fund Cataloging-in-Publication Data Regional economic outlook : Middle East and Central Asia. – [Washington, D.C.] : International Monetary Fund, 2009. p. ; cm. – (World economic and financial surveys, 0258-7440) ISBN 978-1-58906-842-1 “MAY09.” Includes bibliographical references. 1. Economic forecasting – Middle East. 2. Economic forecasting – Asia, Central. 3. Middle East – Economic conditions. 4. Middle East – Economic conditions – Statistics. 5. Asia, Central – Economic conditions. 6. Asia, Central – Economic conditions – Statistics. I. International Monetary Fund. II. Series: World economic and financial surveys. HC415.15.R445 2009 Please send orders to: International Monetary Fund, Publication Services 700 19th St. N.W., Washington, D.C. 20431, U.S.A. Tel.: (202) 623-7430 Fax: (202) 623-7201 E-mail: publications@imf.org Internet: www.imfbookstore.org The views expressed in this publication are those of the contributors...

Words: 26796 - Pages: 108

Premium Essay

Blowback

...Blowback and the Perception of Hatred for the Western World by the Middle Eastern/Muslim Community Introduction The concept of blowback refers to those unintended consequences which are suffered by the civil population of an aggressor government as a result of the covert operations of another government or international body. In the context of this research paper, the western world is portrayed as acting on intelligence to effect attacks against the Middle East, and the former emerges as the aggressor. To the affected civil population, the covert operations are perceived as random incidences of political violence, acts which have no justifiable cause. This perception can be attributed to the fact that the civil population is largely ignorant of the underlying causes that necessitated the attack or counter-attack. As a result, this perception creates sentiments of hatred for the western world with the common view being that the native Middle Eastern community is being victimized for its inherent cultural or religious beliefs. According to Brown, the concept of blowback was first coined by the Central Intelligence Agency and refers to the negative consequences of foreign policies that were kept secret by the agency from the American people (74). Brown notes that the frequent reports that are often aired by the media on the malign acts of terrorists, illegal arms merchants or drug lords are usually blowbacks from previous American Intelligence operations. This subsequently...

Words: 759 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Nesa

...RESUME – SENIOR EXECUTIVE SEMINAR AT NEAR EAST SOUTH ASIA(NESA)CENTER FOR STRATEGIC STUDIES,WASHINGTON,USA 1. General. The NESA Center fosters open communication and educational opportunities for military and civilian representatives from the NESA region and other participating countries. Its academic environment uniquely facilitates a cross-cultural examination of the events, ideas, and challenges that shape this critical region. This year the seminar was conducted from 05 – 15 February at the NESA center Washington, DC and attended by thirty one representatives from nineteen countries within the region including the host country USA. 2. Aim. The aim of this paper is to provide a short appraisal of the seminar. 3. Background of NESA. NESA is a unique organization funded and oversees by the Department of Defence to serve and support the challenging region that extends from North Africa across the Arabian Peninsula and into South Asia. In meeting its challenge to enhance security in the region, it fosters regional cooperation by building sustained and mutually beneficial relationship through effective communication and candid interaction in an academic environment. It provided a focal point where professionals can gather to exchange ideas and explore tools for cooperative problem solving. The vision of this organization is to build sustained, engaged communities of influence and partnership among security professionals and leaders in the NESA region. 4. Broad Modality...

Words: 762 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

The Maronite Church

...Introduction The Lebanese outside of Lebanon vastly outnumber those in Lebanon. This is especially true of the Christians, and the Maronites in particular. Those Maronites are numerous and influential on an individual basis. Most, however, shun involvement with organized groups dealing with socio-political issues concerning Lebanon and the Christians due to the fractured approach and the myriad of elements supposedly acting on behalf of the Maronites in Lebanon. These Maronites of the Diaspora have an opportunity to influence the outcome of deliberations concerning socio-political issues in Lebanon and the Middle East if they unify under, and maximize the resources of, the Maronite Church under the strong leadership of the Patriarch. Background Throughout history the Maronite Patriarchy has played both a religious and political role in Lebanon and the Middle East. The Patriarch has been a diplomatic force for the building of consensus among divergent religious and political elements. It commands the allegiance and obedience of all of the bishops in Lebanon and the trust of the faithful. As time passed, there has been a geographical shift in the location of the Maronites. Many of them live outside of Lebanon. Many are shepherded by bishops while others are not. There is little universal respect for the humanitarian, social, economic, or political efforts of the Patriarchy either among the bishops or the faithful today. This leaves the Patriarchy weakened to a great...

Words: 657 - Pages: 3